Next Article in Journal
Immune Responses to Dengue and Zika Viruses—Guidance for T Cell Vaccine Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends and the Economic Effect of Asbestos Bans and Decline in Asbestos Consumption and Production Worldwide
Previous Article in Journal
New Evidence on the Effect of Medical Insurance on the Obesity Risk of Rural Residents: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS, 2004–2011)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Asbestos Ban in Korea from a Grassroots Perspective: Why Did It Occur?
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(2), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020384

Australia’s Ongoing Legacy of Asbestos: Significant Challenges Remain Even after the Complete Banning of Asbestos Almost Fifteen Years Ago

1
Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, P.O. Box 3628, Rhodes, NSW 2138, Australia
2
Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, P.O. Box 160, Granville, NSW 2142, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 December 2017 / Revised: 28 January 2018 / Accepted: 13 February 2018 / Published: 23 February 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [938 KB, uploaded 23 February 2018]   |  

Abstract

The most effective way of reducing the global burden of asbestos-related diseases is through the implementation of asbestos bans and minimising occupational and non-occupational exposure to respirable asbestos fibres. Australia’s asbestos consumption peaked in the 1970s with Australia widely thought to have had among the highest per-capita asbestos consumption level of any country. Australia’s discontinuation of all forms of asbestos and asbestos-containing products and materials did not occur at a single point of time. Crocidolite consumption ceased in the late 1960s, followed by amosite consumption stopping in the mid 1980s. Despite significant government reports being published in 1990 and 1999, it was not until the end of 2003 that a complete ban on all forms of asbestos (crocidolite, amosite, and chrysotile) was introduced in Australia. The sustained efforts of trade unions and non-governmental organisations were essential in forcing the Australian government to finally implement the 2003 asbestos ban. Trade unions and non-government organisations continue to play a key role today in monitoring the government’s response to Australian asbestos-related disease epidemic. There are significant challenges that remain in Australia, despite a complete asbestos ban being implemented almost fifteen years ago. The Australian epidemic of asbestos-related disease has only now reached its peak. A total of 16,679 people were newly diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma between 1982 and 2016, with 84% of cases occurring in men. There has been a stabilisation of the age-standardised malignant mesothelioma incidence rate in the last 10 years. In 2016, the incidence rate per 100,000 was 2.5 using the Australian standard population and 1.3 using the Segi world standard population. Despite Australia’s complete asbestos ban being in place since 2003, public health efforts must continue to focus on preventing the devastating effects of avoidable asbestos-related diseases, including occupational and non-occupational groups who are potentially at risk from exposure to respirable asbestos fibres. View Full-Text
Keywords: asbestos; Australia; prevention; mesothelioma; ban; asbestosis asbestos; Australia; prevention; mesothelioma; ban; asbestosis
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Soeberg, M.; Vallance, D.A.; Keena, V.; Takahashi, K.; Leigh, J. Australia’s Ongoing Legacy of Asbestos: Significant Challenges Remain Even after the Complete Banning of Asbestos Almost Fifteen Years Ago. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 384.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top