Next Article in Journal
Undertaking a Collaborative Rapid Realist Review to Investigate What Works in the Successful Implementation of a Frail Older Person’s Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Australia’s Ongoing Legacy of Asbestos: Significant Challenges Remain Even after the Complete Banning of Asbestos Almost Fifteen Years Ago
Previous Article in Journal
Managing Exposure to Benzene and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons at Two Oil Refineries 1977–2014
Previous Article in Special Issue
Asbestos-Related Disorders in Germany: Background, Politics, Incidence, Diagnostics and Compensation
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(2), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020198

The Asbestos Ban in Korea from a Grassroots Perspective: Why Did It Occur?

1
Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon 21565, Korea
3
Asia Citizen’s Center for Environment and Health, Seoul 03184, Korea
4
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonjin Green Hospital, Seoul 02228, Korea
5
Department of Public Health, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea
6
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Korea
7
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 December 2017 / Revised: 17 January 2018 / Accepted: 19 January 2018 / Published: 25 January 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1250 KB, uploaded 25 January 2018]   |  

Abstract

In 2009, asbestos was finally banned in Korea, about 70 years after the first opening of asbestos mines under Japanese control. After having presented the history of asbestos industry, together with its regulations and health effects over time, we constructed narrative analyses of how the asbestos issue under the prevailing risk system was managed by whom and for what purpose, to provide context for the change. We could identify five different phases: laissez-faire, politico-technical, economic–managerial, health-oriented cultural, and human rights-based post-cultural risk systems. The changes leading to the asbestos ban evolved over different phases, and each phase change was necessary to reach the final ban, in that, without resolving the previous issues by examining different categories of potential alternatives, either the final ban was not possible or, even if instituted, could not be sustained. An asbestos ban could be introduced when all the alternatives to these issues, including legitimate political windows, economic rationalizations, health risk protections, and human rights sensitivities, were available. We think the alternatives that we had were not in perfect shape, but in more or less loosely connected forms, and hence we had to know how to build solidarities between different stakeholders to compensate for the imperfections. View Full-Text
Keywords: asbestos ban; Korea; narrative analysis; health-oriented cultural change; health and safety stage; grassroots asbestos ban; Korea; narrative analysis; health-oriented cultural change; health and safety stage; grassroots
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, Y.-R.; Kwak, K.M.; Choi, Y.; Youn, K.; Bahk, J.; Kang, D.-M.; Paek, D. The Asbestos Ban in Korea from a Grassroots Perspective: Why Did It Occur? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 198.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top