Next Article in Journal
Time Trend and Demographic and Geographic Disparities in Childhood Obesity Prevalence in China—Evidence from Twenty Years of Longitudinal Data
Previous Article in Journal
Severe Pneumonia Caused by Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Successfully Managed with Extracorporeal Life Support in a Comorbid Former Preterm Infant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electronic Cigarette Use and Smoking Abstinence in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study of Quitting Methods
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessEssay
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(4), 363; doi:10.3390/ijerph14040363

A Risk Assessment Matrix for Public Health Principles: The Case for E-Cigarettes

1
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Via Palermo 636, 95121 Catania, Italy
2
Keller and Heckman LLP, 1001 G Street N.W., Suite 500W, Washington, DC 20001, USA
3
Department of Law, University of Catania, Via Gallo 24, 95124 Catania, Italy
4
School of Specialization in Occupational Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98122 Messina, Italy
5
Centre for Tobacco Cessation and Prevention, Teaching Hospital “Policlinico-V. Emanuele”, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Mark Wolfson and Paul B. Tchounwou
Received: 29 December 2016 / Revised: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 27 March 2017 / Published: 31 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue E-Cigarettes: Epidemiology, Policy and Public Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [336 KB, uploaded 31 March 2017]

Abstract

Besides nicotine replacement therapies, a realistic alternative for smoking cessation or for smoking substitution may come from electronic cigarettes (ECs), whose popularity has been steadily growing. As for any emerging behaviour associated with exposure to inhalational agents, there is legitimate cause for concern and many health organizations and policy makers have pushed for restrictive policy measures ranging from complete bans to tight regulations of these products. Nonetheless, it is important to reframe these concerns in context of the well-known harm caused by cigarette smoking. In this article, we discuss key public health principles that should be considered when regulating ECs. These include the concept of tobacco harm reduction, importance of relative risk and risk continuum, renormalization of smoking, availability of low-risk product, proportionate taxation, and reassessment of the role of non-tobacco flavours. These public health principles may be systematically scrutinized using a risk assessment matrix that allows: (1) to determine the measure of certainty that a risk will occur; and (2) to estimate the impact of such a risk on public health. Consequently, the ultimate goal of responsible ECs regulation should be that of maximizing the favourable impact of these reduced-risk products whilst minimizing further any potential risks. Consumer perspectives, sound EC research, continuous post-marketing surveillance and reasonable safety and quality product standards should be at the very heart of future regulatory schemes that will address concerns while minimizing unintended consequences of ill-informed regulation. View Full-Text
Keywords: cigarette smoking; electronic cigarettes; tobacco harm reduction; risk continuum; risk assessment; regulation; public health cigarette smoking; electronic cigarettes; tobacco harm reduction; risk continuum; risk assessment; regulation; public health
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Saitta, D.; Chowdhury, A.; Ferro, G.A.; Nalis, F.G.; Polosa, R. A Risk Assessment Matrix for Public Health Principles: The Case for E-Cigarettes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 363.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top