Next Article in Journal
Chitosan Modification and Pharmaceutical/Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Research and Application of Marine Microbial Enzymes: Status and Prospects

Mar. Drugs 2008, 8(6), 1935-1961; doi:10.3390/md8061935

Review
Ecological and Physiological Studies of Gymnodinium catenatum in the Mexican Pacific: A Review
Christine J. Band-Schmidt 1,*, José J. Bustillos-Guzmán 2, David J. López-Cortés 2, Ismael Gárate-Lizárraga 1, Erick J. Núñez-Vázquez 2 and Francisco E. Hernández-Sandoval 1,2
1
Departamento de Plancton y Ecología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, A.P. 592, La Paz, B.C.S. 23000, Mexico; E-Mail: igarate@ipn.mx(I.G. -L.)
2
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, A. P. 128, La Paz, B.C.S. 23000, Mexico; E-Mails: jose04@cibnor.mx(J. J.B.-G.);dlopez04@cibnor.mx(D. J.L.-C.); enunez04@cibnor.mx(E. J.N.-V.);fhernan04@cibnor.mx (F. E.H.-S.)
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: cbands@ipn.mx; Tel.: +52-612-122-5344; Fax: +52-612-122-5322.
Received: 17 May 2010; in revised form: 3 June 2010 / Accepted: 10 June 2010 /
Published: 23 June 2010

Abstract

: This review presents a detailed analysis of the state of knowledge of studies done in Mexico related to the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum, a paralytic toxin producer. This species was first reported in the Gulf of California in 1939; since then most studies in Mexico have focused on local blooms and seasonal variations. G. catenatum is most abundant during March and April, usually associated with water temperatures between 18 and 25 ºC and an increase in nutrients. In vitro studies of G. catenatum strains from different bays along the Pacific coast of Mexico show that this species can grow in wide ranges of salinities, temperatures, and N:P ratios. Latitudinal differences are observed in the toxicity and toxin profile, but the presence of dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, C1, and C2 are usual components. A common characteristic of the toxin profile found in shellfish, when G. catenatum is present in the coastal environment, is the detection of dcGTX2-3, dcSTX, C1, and C2. Few bioassay studies have reported effects in mollusks and lethal effects in mice, and shrimp; however no adverse effects have been observed in the copepod Acartia clausi. Interestingly, genetic sequencing of D1-D2 LSU rDNA revealed that it differs only in one base pair, compared with strains from other regions.
Keywords:
ecology; Gymnodinium catenatum; growth rate; harmful algae blooms; Mexican Pacific; paralytic toxins; physiological effects

1. Introduction

This review covers the state of knowledge of scientific studies of Gymnodinium catenatum Graham from the Gulf of California and the Pacific coast of Mexico. Many of the relevant studies have only been published in journals with low international impact, however this species is one of the most studied harmful algal blooms (HAB) species in Mexico. G. catenatum is a cosmopolitan species, occurring in the North Pacific, South East Pacific, Atlantic, Mediterranean Sea, South Caribbean Sea, East Arabian Sea, China Sea, South East Indian Ocean, and the Tasmanian Sea. This species is an unarmored dinoflagellate that occurs as chains and cysts, produces saxitoxin analogs, and forms HAB. It is distributed in warm-temperate regions and is a potential threat to other species including human health.

2. Distribution of Gymnodinium catenatum along the Western Coasts of Mexico and Associated Toxic Events

In Mexico, G. catenatum has only been reported along the Pacific coast (Figure 1). Blooms of this species were first observed in 1939 in the northern central part of the Gulf of California [1,2]. G. catenatum is the only unarmored dinoflagellate in this genus that produces paralytic shellfish toxins (PST) [3].The production of PST was first demonstrated by Oshima et al. [4]. Probably the first record of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) on the Mexican Pacific was in 1939 [5]. The first PSP linked to G. catenatum occurred from the coast of Sonora to Jalisco states in 1979, with a toxicity reaching up to 7,500 μg STXeq 100 g−1 [6]. Three deaths and 19 shellfish poisonings of humans occurred during this event; the victims that were most seriously affected were between five and 14 years old [6,7]. Since 1979, 10 cases of intoxication have occurred in this bay [8]. During the last few years, reports of HAB and presence of this species in several bays along the Pacific coast have increased ( Table 1).

In Mexico, studies of G. catenatum have focused mainly on local blooms. This species has a very marked seasonal pattern [15,16,54,55]. It is sometimes found from January through December, but observed most frequently during the months of March and April [3,30,54,55]. Blooms usually disperse in a few days or weeks [54], causing the sea to appear red, or alternatively may go unnoticed because higher cell aggregations often occur at depths of 10 to 20 m [56].

3. Ecological Studies

Nutrients play an important role in the relation of phytoplankton growth and distribution in aquatic ecosystems [5759]. Eutrophication seems to be one of the principal reasons for the increase in frequency and the number of species causing HAB events as well as an increase in the duration of blooms [60,6266]. Along the Pacific coast of Mexico, few studies have been done relating variations of nutrients with the presence or increase of HAB species. Most studies result from opportunistic observations; therefore, they lack physical and chemical data. In this section, we review the published information and, for the sake of clarity, the ecological studies are separated into four geographical regions: the Gulf of California, the west coast of the Baja California Peninsula, the central Mexican Pacific, and the southern Mexican Pacific (see Figure 1).

3.1. Gulf of California

The Gulf of California is a subtropical, semi-enclosed sea with exceptionally high primary productivity [67]. It supports important commercial fisheries, tourism, shrimp aquaculture, and has a high influence of nutrient inputs mainly coming from agriculture activities of the East coast [68]. Several bays are found in this area: Bahía de Los Ángeles, Bahía Concepción, Bahía de La Paz, Bahía Bacochibampo, and Bahía de Mazatlán. The biggest urban developments in this region are the cities of La Paz and Mazatlán. The hydrography and seasonal productivity in the Gulf of California is governed by winds, upwelling, and large-scale climatic events [65,6973]. During the last few decades, the number of species and duration of HAB events in the Gulf of California has increased [12,54], with G. catenatum being one of the toxic species that frequently forms blooms.

Graham [1] found G. catenatum for the first time in samples collected in March 1939 in the northern part of the Gulf of California (~29° N), forming a visible bloom of ~1 × 106 cells L−1 (Table 1). During the bloom, temperature and salinity ranged between 14–17 °C and 35.07–35.50 psu. More recently in this area, this species was reported in Puerto Libertad [9] and Bahía de Los Ángeles [11] (Table 1). In Bahía de Los Ángeles, paralytic shellfish toxins (PST) were detected in the scallop Nodipecten subnodosus(3–54 μg STXeq 100 g−1).

In Bahía Concepción (Figure 1), G. catenatum is often present without forming blooms and is abundant when the water column is stratified with high concentrations of nutrients localized primarily at the sub-surface level (~20 m) [56,74]. In this bay, Gárate-Lizárraga et al. [16] reported a temperature range between 22 °C and 26 °C for G. catenatum (Table 1) and suggested that the temperature is an important factor in outbreaks of this species. They also concluded that the mesotrophic process, characterized by nitrogen limitation, partly explains the high concentration of neoSTX in G. catenatum. The highest PST concentration reported in bivalve mollusks in this bay is of 298 μg SXT eq 100 g−1 in May 1999 [13]. Bahía Concepción is one of the few bays where studies on cyst dynamics have been done. Yields of cysts of G. catenatum are low, but seem to be a constant inoculum that sustains its population for long periods [75]. Cysts of this species have a short maturation period and can germinate under a wide range of environmental conditions [76,77].

In Bahía Bacochibampo(Figure 1), red tide events were monitored from 1970 through to 1994, with G. catenatum being one of the responsible species; however, no toxic events were reported [55] (Table 1). This bay is characterized by a high primary productivity associated with seasonal upwelling. In Bahía Kun Kaak (Figure 1), G. catenatum was reported during a multispecies bloom (April–May, 2003) that included a raphidophyte and other dinoflagellate species [10] and occurred under the influence of intensified upwelling and northwest winds. The raphidophyte dominated the bloom, which occurred at a mean temperature of 25.32 ± 0.99 °C, a salinity of 40.30 ± 1.03 psu, with phosphates and nitrates ranging from 0.54 to 3.0 mg L −1 and 0.1 to 0.2 mg L −1, respectively. In Bahía de La Paz (Figure 1), G. catenatum, has been registered several times since 1997 (Table 1), with cells densities varying from 1.6 × 102 to 6.0 × 106 cell L−1 within a temperature range from 18 to 26.5 ºC. In some events toxins have been detected in phytoplankton net samples and scallops, but toxin concentrations in scallops have never been above the maximum level for human consumption (0.14–67 μg SXT eq 100 g−1) [15]. In this bay, G. catenatum has also coincided with other bloom forming species. In June 2003, low cell densities (800–1,200 cells L−1) of this species were recorded during a bloom of Chaetoceros debilis Ehrenberg [18]. In February–March 2007, G. catenatum co-ocurred with N. scintillans [21], and during the bloom PST were found in several species of bivalve mollusks (Table 1). In June 2008, coinciding with a local upwelling event, Gárate-Lizárraga et al. [22] reported G. catenatum as one of the dominant species during a multispecies bloom of M. rubra, Katodinium glaucum(Lebour) Loeblich III, and Gyrodinium instriatum Freudenthal et Lee.

In June 2003, the presence of G. catenatum was associated with upwelling waters with high concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate (4.5 μM, 7.4 μM, and 1.4 μM, respectively). However, these nutrient concentrations did not generate high G. catenatum densities, probably due to the dominance of the diatom. In June–July of 2006, another HAB event was recorded in Bahía de La Paz [19,20], under relatively low nutrient conditions. The average concentrations of nitrates, ammonium, and phosphates were low (1.0, 0.9, and 0.8 μM, respectively) [20].

Along the coastal lagoons of Sinaloa (eastern shore of the Gulf of California), G. catenatum is a common bloom forming species [78,79]. The first HAB reported in Mexico of this species was in Bahía de Mazatlán (Figure 1) from February to April of 1979. The bloom was very intense and extensive, with average cell densities of 1.2 × 106 cells L−1 and high levels of PST in bivalves (Table 1). Since this event, this area has been one of the most extensively monitored in our country. Between 1981 and 2006, many blooms of G. catenatum have been reported, however toxin analyses have not always been reported. From 2003 to 2007, PST in mollusks were between 63 and 1315 μg SXTeq 100 g−1[30]. Analysis of the HAB of G. catenatum occurring in this area demonstrate that these events occurred mainly in late winter and early spring [79], during upwelling events [6,12,25,28,32,78,8084], and within a temperature range of 16.5 to 32.9 ºC [9,15,23]. The effect of the El Niño or La Niña event for this species is not clear since Alonso-Rodríguez and Ochoa [80] did not find any bloom of G. catenatum during La Niña 2000 in Bahía de Mazatlán, however in Bahía de Bacochibampo, blooms of G. catenatum were found to increase during a La Niña events[ 55].

In Bahía de Mazatlán, G. catenatum has also been reported with other bloom forming species [28,82]. Alonso-Rodríguez [28] related a multispecies bloom (February 1995 to August 1996) with wind mixing processes, which contributed to the resuspension of cysts and nutrient increases, however, there was no clear relationship to eutrophication. In February 1996, an abrupt decrease of 2.5 °C in the mean surface temperature (from 24.5 °C to 22 °C) followed by a rapid rise in temperature to 24.0 °C, over a three day time period, coincided with a bloom of G. catenatum [83], suggesting that the temperature change favored the growth of this species. Recently, in Laguna de Macapule, a coastal lagoon in Sinaloa, G. catenatum was reported with an abundance of 38.8 × 103 cell L−1 [32]. Clearly, Bahía de Mazatlán is one of the zones in Mexico with the highest number of studies on the presence of red tide events caused by G. catenatum. Palynological records show that G. catenatum cysts have been present in the Gulf of California since ~1483 [81], with higher abundances from 1888 to 1920. Cyst abundances seem to increase during La Niña conditions and decrease during warmer El Niño events, abundances were also inversely related with sea surface temperature (SST), decreasing steadily from 1972 to 1994 as the SST increased in this area.

3.2. West Coast of Baja California Peninsula

The western coast of the Baja California Peninsula is influenced by the California and North-equatorial Currents [83], and El Niño events [86,90]. It has a low human influence that is mainly linked to local fisheries of sardines and mollusks [88]. Bahía Magdalena, found in this area (Figure 1), is a highly eutrophic ecosystem influenced by intense currents, mixing processes, and upwelling [89]. Red tides have been reported during coastal upwelling [90]. In this bay, G. catenatum has been recorded once in net phytoplankton samples [34] (Table 1). This species has also been found in low concentrations (1200 to 4200 cells L−1) near Punta Colnett, during summer when regional upwelling is dominant [33].

3.3. Central Mexican Pacific

This area is an important tourist zone, and recently aquaculture activities—mainly shrimp farms—have been developed. The principal bays in this area are Bahía Banderas and Bahía de Manzanillo. In Bahía de Manzanillo the main merchant ship commerce is found [91]. Eutrophication linked to tuna factories [38] and continental nutrient discharges have been observed [92].

In Puerto Vallarta, G. catenatum was reported for the first time in 1979 (Table 1), during the same event that extended from La Cruz de Elota, Sinaloa to Jalisco [6]. In the winter and spring of 1999, a bloom of G. catenatum lasted approximately three months covering a large part of Bahía de Manzanillo [40,41] (Table 1); high oxygen values (18 mg L−1) and low nitrate concentrations were recorded (0.05 μg-at L−1). Seasonal marine currents in the area seemed to have dispersed the biomass, which avoided its accumulation at the bottom, which would create anoxic conditions that may limit the length of the bloom [93].

During 2000 and 2001, HAB of G. catenatum were documented in Puerto Vallarta and Bahía de Banderas (Figure 1) [3537]. During spring 2007, G. catenatum abundances between 450 to 2,134,000 cells L−1; however toxin levels found in the oyster species Crassostrea iridescens Hanley were below the maximum limit for human consumption (Table 1) [37]. In 2007, toxin concentration in mollusks was high (235 μg STXeq 100 g−1) [42]. In a recently monitored area (Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán), a G. catenatum bloom was reported for the first time in November 2005, with a cell density of 560,000 cells L−1[ 94].

Several hypotheses have been proposed for this area to explain the presence of these blooms: eutrophication linked to tuna factories [38], continental nutrient discharges [89], and transportation of cysts by ballast water [38]. Further detailed studies need to be carried out to confirm these hypothesis.

3.4. Southern Mexican Pacific

In this area important tourist influence is observed with the concomitant impact in nutrient inputs. Also river drainage is an important source of nutrients [95,96]. The principal bays are Bahía de Acapulco, Laguna Corralero-Alotengo, and Bahías de Huatulco.

Bahía de Acapulco (Figure 1) is a shallow bay (average depth, 20 m) with high anthropogenic impact and land drainage [95,96]. In March–April 1999, a red tide of G. catenatum was registered for the first time in Bahía de Acapulco (Figure 1), with cell densities between 7.6 × 103–37.6 × 103 cells L−1, despite these relatively low cell densities, toxin concentrations in mollusks were above the maximum limit for human consumption [45,46] (Table 1). This species appeared again in November 2005 (6.29 × 103 cells L−1), January 2006 (10 × 106 cells L−1), and December 2007 (1942 × 103 cells L−1) [47,97]. These G. catenatum abundances are the highest reported for the Mexican Pacific. Toxicity values in mollusks during these events varied between 25 and 1152 μg STXeq 100 g−1(Table 1) [48].

Further south, in the coasts of Oaxaca, blooms of G. catenatum have occurred since 1989 [50] (Table 1). Cell abundances have varied from 13 × 103 to 10 × 106 cells L−1 [38,51,52]. Paralytic toxins were above the maximum limit for human consumption in 2001, however toxicity was also related to the presence of Pyrodinium bahamense [53,98], another PSP toxin producer.

4. Grazing Studies

There are few records on the effect of grazing activity on G. catenatum under natural conditions. Alonso-Rodríguez et al. [99] observed G. catenatum cells in Noctiluca scintillans vacuoles during a HAB of G. catenatum. Predation activity of G. catenatum by N. scintillans may be facilitated by the high swimming velocity of N. scintillans.

Grazing of N. scintillans on cells of G. catenatum (chains of 4–16 cells per Noctiluca) has also been observed in Bahía de Los Angeles, Bahía Concepción, and Bahía de La Paz [47]. In vitro studies have confirmed an important grazing activity of N. scintillans towards G. catenatum [100]. The copepod Acartia clausi Giesbrecht also had a high grazing rate on G. catenatum, with no visible short time harmful effects on the copepod [101]. These data suggest that N. scintillans grazing can be an important factor in controlling G. catenatum blooms.

5. Toxicity Studies

5.1. PST in Phytoplankton Samples Related to the Presence of G. catenatum

Toxin analyses from phytoplankton net samples is a method to confirm that a toxic organism is found in the plankton community, and can help us understand the toxin profile of a toxic species in the environment. The toxin profile in net phytoplankton samples for Bahía Concepción, Bahía de La Paz, and Bahía de Mazatlán has been variable, however STX, neoSXT, GTX2-3, dcGTX2-3, B1, C1, and C2 have been found [15,16,21] (Table 2). Decarbamoyl (dcGTX2 and dcGTX3) and N-sulfocarbamoyl (C1 and C2) are usually the toxins with a high molar contribution [15,21]. Average toxin content reported in field phytoplankton samples from Bahía Concepción varied from 3.8 to 639.1 ng PSP filter−1, and in Bahía de La Paz from 4.32 to 90.54 ng PSP filter−1, Differences in the toxin profile have been observed between sampling stations in net phytoplankton samples, despite being collected during the same event; these differences could be explained by the different development stages of the red tide [21]. More data are needed from field samples in order to explain these differences.

5.2. Toxin Content and Toxin Profile of G. catenatum S trains

Very limited data exists on the toxin content of natural populations of G. catenatum. Gárate-Lizárraga et al. [102] and Band-Schmidt et al. [103,104], found that the toxin content of the G. catenatum strains of the Gulf of California was higher (average values of 25.7–101 pg STXeq cell−1) than the toxin content of natural populations (1.01 pg STXeq cell−1). This could be related to strain growth conditions, because, in culture, the nutrient concentrations are much higher than in the environment. However, more data on toxin content per cell under natural conditions needs to be obtained to confirm these differences.

Differences found in the toxin profile of G. catenatum strains in vitro can be explained partly by the culture medium used. For instance, when using modified f/2 media, Bahía Concepción strains produce dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, C1, and C2 (Table 3). Other toxins, such as neoSTX, GTX2-3, B1, and B2 are only present in some strains and in low molar percentage (below 3 mol%) [17]. In contrast, when using GSe media, the number of saxitoxin analogs is higher (STX, neoSTX, dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, B1-2, C1, C2, C3, and C4); and the contribution of neoSTX is higher (from 6–46%) [104]. Neosaxitoxin has not been reported for strains from G. catenatum of other regions.

Differences in the toxin profile have also been observed with strain origin [102,104]: Bahía Concepción strains had the highest content of C1; BAPAZ and BAMAZ strains had a higher percentage of neoSTX. Differences in the toxin composition with culture age were observed only in BAMAZ and BAPAZ strains. These differences with culture age seem to be related to chain length, since cultures with a higher percentage of long chains had more neoSTX, while those with a higher proportion of short chains had a lower concentration of neoSTX. Differences in toxicity per cell were also observed:BAPAZ and BAMAZ strains were the most toxic (101 pg STXeq cell−1), whereas strains from BACO were the least toxic (13 pg STXeq cell−1).

The most abundant toxins in phytoplankton samples (dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, C1, and C2) do not vary in concentration in response to changes in culture media, strain origin, and N:P ratios. For example, when cultivating a strain from BACO with N:P ratios ranging from 1:6 to 32:1, no observable differences were found in the toxin profile across the different treatments [105]. However, the production of neoSTX often varies with the strain origin and with different culture media (Table 3). Additionally, the culture age seems to play a role in a differential production of saxitoxin analogs of G. catenatum [104,105]: after the tenth day of growth with different N:P ratios, an increase in the percentage of carbamoyl and decarbamoyl toxins occurred (18–26% and 11–16%, respectively) as compared with the toxin composition during the first eight days of culture, with a carbamoyl production from 9 to 14% and decarbamoyl production below 5% [105].

It seems that strains from the Gulf of California are characterized by the presence of neoSTX, and they seem to have evolved particular physiological responses to their environment that are reflected in their toxin profiles, suggesting different populations. Also, the variation in the toxin profiles of G. catenatum isolated from different zones of the Mexican Pacific (Bahía Concepción, Bahía de Mazatlán, and Bahía de La Paz), could be related to the differences in the source and concentration of nutrients of each embayment [102].

5.3. Presence of PST in Mollusks Linked to HAB of G. catenatum

The analyses of the toxin content in different clams and scallops of several embayments from the Gulf of California has been done during the presence of G. catenatum (Table 1). Toxicity was variable: the highest toxicity values in mollusks were found in Bahía de Mazatlán (up to 7,500 μg STXeq 100 g−1) [6] (Table 1).

The toxin profile of mollusks feeding naturally with wild populations of G. catenatum has also been determined in several species [15,21,30,37,103] (Table 4). The toxin profile varied within each zone and with mollusk species. In general, mollusks usually contained a high molar percentage of C1 and C2 toxins (see Table 4), similar to cultured G. catenatum strains, and phytoplankton net samples. Decarbamoyl toxins (dcSTX, dcGTX2-3) were also found in high molar percentages in mollusk samples.

An annual variation of toxicity and toxin profile in marine bivalves has been performed in Bahía de Los Ángeles, Bahía Concepción, Bahía de La Paz, and Bahía de Mazatlán [11,13,15,17,30,34]. Toxicity levels were correlated to the presence and abundance of G. catenatum cells in the water column, showing a clear seasonal pattern with higher toxin content in mollusks in May–June [13,17]. Toxin profiles of PST varied monthly, probably according to the cell abundance and metabolism of the mollusk. In most cases, N-sulfocarbamoyl toxins were the most abundant toxins, contributing usually more than 60% of the total toxin content. These high molar percentage contributions of the N-sulfocarbamoyl toxins may explain the low toxicity found in the shellfish (Table 2). Most shellfish contain a mixture of several PST, depending on the species of algae, geographic area, and shellfish species involved. For instance, toxic shellfish that grow in cold or temperate waters usually contain sulfated C toxins, GTX2-3, and STX [106]. When bivalves have recently ingested toxin-containing dinoflagellates, they typically contain high proportions of C1–C2 [4,13,15,107]. Experimental studies of toxicity in the scallop species M. squalida fed with G. catenatum also presented a high percentage of N-sulfocarbamoyl toxins, supporting the hypothesis that toxicity in scallops from the Gulf of California are linked to this dinoflagellate [108].

The presence of PST (GTX-2 and C1) has also been found in the liver of puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus Jenyns from Bahía de La Paz and the mucus of Arothron meleagris Laceepéde from Punta Pericos. The analyses of the feeding behavior of these organisms, and the existence of PST dinoflagellates (e.g. G. catenatum) in the zone suggest the transfer of these toxins via mollusks[109].

6. Toxic Effects of G. catenatum on Terrestrial and Marine Organisms or Toxic Effects of G. catenatum on Other Organisms

6.1. Laboratory Studies

Experimental work utilizing G. catenatum has focused on diverse physiological aspects of mammals, crustaceans, and bivalves (Table 5). Necropsy in mice (Swiss CD1 and BALB/c) with an acute saxitoxin exposure show a pronounced ischemic zone in the liver border. A degeneration of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum was also observed in histological observations of mice exposed to toxic extracts of G. catenatum [110]. Effects on grazing rates, egg production, and hatching success when the copepod Acartia clausi was fed with the dinoflagellate [101], showed no apparent harmful effects. However, egg production and hatching success increased with a higher consumption of G. catenatum. In the same experiment, the toxin profile of the copepod was analyzed, finding neoSXT, dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, B1-2, and C2 with a toxicity value of 12.7 pg STXeq copepod−1 [16]. In conclusion, A. clausi not only accumulates PST but can also transform them. In natural populations, the effect on white shrimp larvae (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone) was lethal at concentrations of 50,000 cells L−1 [99] (Table 1). Juvenile and adult shrimps injected with varying quantities of PST showed a time-to-death below seven minutes [111]. Chronic assays in shrimp also demonstrated significant differences in survival rates, percentage of feed, and weight gain [112]. Gastric glands and muscle of shrimp retained PST for a longer period and histological damages were observed in the heart, gastric gland, and brain tissue. These effects may explain the relationship of shrimp nauplii and postlarvae mortality in farms during a bloom of G. catenatum [23]. 10–20% mortality was observed in adults and metanauplii in Artemia exposed to G. catenatum. Behavioral symptoms such as erratic swimming, spasm, and convulsions were observed in Artemia when exposed to G. catenatum cells. Mortality of Artemia exposed to G. catenatum has been observed previously [113], and it has been demonstrated that Artemia can transfer PST via the marine food chain (Alexandrium tamarense to Artemia salina to Neomysis awatschensis to Lateolabrax japonicus)[114].

STX and neoSTX accumulated in the bivalves, M. squalida and Nodipecten subnodosus Sowerby, when exposed to G. catenatum cultures [108,115]. Differences in the toxin profile of the G. catenatum strains used in these studies were observed; the strain used by Estrada et al. [115] was rich in gonyautoxins, while the toxin profile of the strain used by Pérez-Cruz [108] was composed of STX, neoSTX, dcSTX, dcGTX2-3, C1, and C2, which is similar to those reported previously [17]. These differences could be due to culture conditions of the dinoflagellate, culture age, strain differences or extraction methods used. In both mollusks, the presence of highly toxic analogs suggests a biotransformation process [117] in a short time from N-sulfocarbamoyl to carbamoyl toxins. The depuration rate was moderate, between 0.19 and 0.23 day in the clam [108] and 0.4 day in the scallop [115], the toxin content after the thirteenth day in clams was only 4–5% of that found at the time of initiation. Short-term effects (24 h) on the immunological system of the clam N. subnodosus, when fed with G. catenatum, were also studied by Estrada et al. [118,119]. Several enzymes involved in antioxidant, lipid peroxidation, and hydrolytic activity were considered. Important changes were noted in the exposed scallops with an increase of antioxidant and hydrolytic enzymes mainly in the gills and the digestive gland. A melanization in gills, mantle, and labial palps was also reported. Lipid peroxidation has also been observed in Dosinia ponderosa and Crassostrea gigas exposed to G. catenatum cells [120]. Different responses to toxin exposure can be expected, since life history exposure to toxins plays an important role [116].

6.2. Aquaculture Activities

Blooms of G. catenatum, among other toxic species along the coast of Sinaloa (Gulf of California), caused the death of nauplii and adult shrimps in shrimp farms [23,24,121]. These authors assumed that the toxicity was caused by G. catenatum in the water introduced to the ponds by the pumping system. The mortality occurred with the events of HAB of G. catenatum from February to March 2001, concluding that the contamination, climatic conditions, and inadequate management in fertilization, feeding rate, and food composition can provoke delay in the growth of the shrimp and decrease their production through massive mortality. Sierra-Beltrán et al. [122] speculated that in the central part of the Gulf of California, the urban aquatic residues and the eutrophication generated by the shrimp farmers could be responsible for the proliferation of G. catenatum and other species. García-Hernández et al. [10] concluded that the residues of the shrimp farms and shrimp larvae producing laboratories are deposited without treatment to Bahía Kun Kaak, which is known to be a highly productive ecosystem. This natural condition, and the water input with high content of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, probably contributes to the formation of red tides. Other regions of the coasts of Sonora (Gulf of California) have also had high nitrogen contributions, related to fertilization process, which are added to coastal waters by runoff (36.8 × 106–201 × 106 moles of N) [64]. These findings suggest that this loss by irrigation can support phytoplankton blooms in the Gulf of California. It is probable that the eutrophication processes in this ecosystem are seasonal events [123] and are influenced by upwelling events, agriculture, and aquaculture contributions. Dumping and wastewater treatment regulations are recommended to obtain a good water quality, and equilibrium in the phytoplanktonic communities. These results show the importance of establishing continuous monitoring of the water quality that flows into and out of shrimp culture systems.

7. Growth Variations of G. catenatumStrains of the Gulf of California

Growth rates of different G. catenatum strains vary from 0.08 to 0.82 day−1 (Table 6), with the highest exponential growth rates obtained in GSe media with values above 0.70 day−1. Maximum cell densities vary between 1,090 and 3,940 cells mL−1 and are usually obtained between 14 and 18 days of growth.

Growth rate varies significantly with temperature. In a strain from Bahía Concepción, the highest growth rates (0.18–0.21 day−1) are obtained between 21 and 30 ºC. A high salinity range (15–40 ups) is also observed in Bahía Concepción strains, with the highest growth rates (0.30 day−1) occurring at salinities from 28–38 ups with seawater from Bahía Concepción. The optimal temperature and salinity ranges coincide with the temperatures and salinities at which G. catenatum has been reported in different regions of the Mexican Pacific, with the exception of the Northern Gulf of California where G. catenatumhas been reported at lower temperatures (see ecological studies).

8. LSUrDNA Sequences

PCR amplifications of Bahía Concepción strains of the D1-D2 fragment of the nuclear large subunit rDNA gene resulted in a single product of approximately 889 base pairs [124]. Strains from Bahía Concepción present a constant characteristic at position≈453, a single nucleotide polymorphism was observed, presenting cytosine instead of guanine. This single base polymorphism could indicate a mutation or genetic isolation from other G. catenatum populations. This possible genetic isolation or population differentiation could be explained by the hydrographic conditions mentioned previously for Bahía Concepción.

9. Conclusions

In summary, G. catenatum produces PST, is distributed along the Mexican Pacific coast, and has been related to the presence of PST in mollusks. Scarce reports exist on the physical and chemical conditions in this coastal ecosystem associated with blooms of G. catenatum. Nevertheless, from the available information, we can conclude that this species tolerates wide temperature and salinity ranges, and N:P ratios which probably has allowed its distribution along the Mexican Pacific. Its toxicity has been related to nutrient availability. Its capacity to produce PST and its environmental and human health costs has directed more attention towards the study of this species, increasing the number of published records in recent years as well as records in different regions of the country. However, many of these publications remain as thesis and/or have been published in Spanish journals, thus limiting their access for international colleagues. A high percentage of these blooms have been associated with an increase in the nutrient contribution, mainly by nitrogen compounds from upwelling events or transitional periods in the water column, and with low SST. In many occasions, G. catenatum has been found with other bloom forming species. Future investigations need to focus on the evaluation of the eutrophication process with systematic monitoring that can allow the quantification of the alterations in the organic matter balance, inorganic nutrients, and the interaction of different species associated with the presence of G. catenatum. In addition, more attention needs to be directed to understand the effect of grazers and their possible role on the development or regulation of HAB of this species.

The toxin profile found in net phytoplankton samples, shellfish, and G. catenatum strains of the Gulf of California is variable, however a common characteristic is that dcGTX2-3, dcSTX, C1, and C2 are always present. Unfortunately, many programs monitoring HAB events of G. catenatum in our country do not have the possibility to determine toxin content in mollusks, and so far, no studies have been done on the benzoate and deoxy decarbamoyl type toxins.

In some regions, data on the toxin analyses of phytoplankton net samples have proved to be useful in the monitoring activities of HAB of G. catenatum, as an early detection method for planktonic toxin producing organisms. More data on the toxin content per cell of field samples of G. catenatum needs to be obtained. However, latitudinal differences have been observed in the toxicity and toxin profile in cultured strains from different embayments of the Gulf of California. So far strains from Bahía de Mazatlán have a higher toxicity and a higher content of carbamoyl toxins than northern strains of the Gulf of California. Interestingly, field samples of G. catenatum show a less complex toxin profile than cultured strains. Further work needs to be done to understand the relationship between environmental factors and toxin variability.

Laboratory studies show that Mexican G. catenatum strains produce effects in most of the organisms tested. Diverse histological and immunological effects were evident in shrimp, mollusks, and mice. However, in a short term study no adverse effects were observed in the copepod A. clausi, when fed with this dinoflagellate. It has been stated that the copepod and Noctiluca could play a key role in controlling the occurrences of red tides of this species. Clearly, more research must be done to evaluate the role of G. catenatumin the ecosystem and aquaculture activities of the Mexican coasts.

The genetic sequence of the D1-D2 LSU rDNA differs from sequences of the same region in strains examined from Europe, Asia or Australia. This suggests that this species in the Gulf of California is not an introduced species, and could be used as a genetic marker for this population. At the moment, the design of DNA probes for the detection of G. catenatum in water samples is being carried out. This is supported with palinological studies that have demonstrated the presence of G. catenatum in this region since ~1483 [25].

Despite the toxicity of G. catenatum and its wide distribution within most regions of the Mexican Pacific, there has been low monitoring effort, and probably many events have gone unnoticed. The increase in the reports of this species during the last decades is probably due to the increased interest in HAB events of this species, and the number of colleagues researching HAB. In spite of being one of the most studied toxic dinoflagellate species in Mexico, there are still many research areas that have not been addressed, such as a finer monitoring design, definitions and quantification of physical-biological cell interactions, interactions between species, cyst studies (transportation, distribution), diverse toxic effects on a wider number of taxa, and toxin metabolism.

Acknowledgments

We remember B.W. Halstead† for donating old documents related to seafood poisoning in Mexico. We thank M.C. Ramírez-Jáuregui (Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) for providing us with literature. We thank D. W. Johnson for reviewing the English, and the reviewers of the Marine Drugs journal for the suggestions to improve this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from CICIMAR-IPN (SIP 20100192), CIBNOR (PC3.2), and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT SEP 2007-84064, 2006-61126). C.J.B S. and I.G L. have EDI and COFFA fellowships.

  • Samples Availability: Available from the authors.

References

  1. Graham, HW. Gymnodinium catenatum, a new dinoflagellate from the Gulf of California. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc 1943, 62, 259–261. [Google Scholar]
  2. Osorio-Tafall, BF. El Mar de Cortés y la productividad fitoplanctónica de sus aguas. Anal. Esc. Nal. Cien. Biol. IPN, Mex 1943, 3, 73–118. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hallegraeff, GM; Fraga, S. Bloom dynamics of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum, with emphasis on Tasmanian and Spanish coastal waters. In Physiological Ecology of Harmful Algal Blooms NATO ASI Series; Anderson, DM, Cembella, AD, Hallegraeff, GM, Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1998; Volume G41, pp. 59–80. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oshima, Y; Hasegawa, M; Yasumoto, T; Hallegraeff, G; Blackburn, S. Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum as the source of paralytic shellfish toxins in Tasmanian shellfish. Toxicon 1987, 25, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bagnis, R; Berglund, F; Elias, PS; Van Esch, GJ; Halstead, BW; Kojima, K. Problems of toxicants in marine food products. 1. Marine Biotoxins. Bull. World Health Org 1970, 42, 69–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mee, LD; Espinosa, M; Díaz, G. Paralytic shellfish poisoning with a Gymnodinium catenatum red tide on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Mar. Environ. Res 1986, 19, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  7. De la Garza-Aguilar, J. Intoxicación alimentaria por ingestión de mariscos contaminados. Sal. Pub. Mex 1983, 25, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Núñez-Pasten, A. Doce años (1979–1990) de registros de mareas rojas en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. An. Inst. Cienc. Mar y Limnol. UNAM 1992, 19, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Núñez-Pastén, A; Pastén-Miranda, N. Abundancia anual de Gymnodinium catenatum Graham dinoflagelado tóxico de la costa Este del Golfo de California. Ciencia y Mar 1999, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. García-Hernández, J; García-Rico, L; Jara-Marini, ME; Barraza-Guardado, R; Hudson Weaver, A. Concentrations of heavy metals in sediment and organisms during a harmful algal bloom (HAB) at Kun Kaak Bay, Sonora, Mexico. Mar. Poll. Bull 2005, 50, 733–739. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Arellano-Martínez, M; Ceballos-Vázquez, BP; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; López-Cortés, DJ; Hernández-Sandoval, F. Fitoplancton tóxico y presencia de toxinas paralizantes en la almeja mano de león (Nodipecten subnodosus, Sowerby, 1835) en la Bahía de Los Ángeles, B.C. Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivo, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November; CICESE-CETMAR: Ensenada, Mexico, 2007; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Hernández-Orozco, ML; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Casillas-Serrano, G. Red tides along the coasts of Baja California Sur, Mexico (1984 to 2001). CICIMAR Oceánides 2001, 16, 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Luckas, B. Comparative paralytic shellfish toxin profiles in two marine bivalves during outbreaks of Gymnodinium catenatum (Dinophyceae) in the Gulf of California. Mar. Poll. Bull 2004, 48, 378–402. [Google Scholar]
  14. Morquecho, ML; Lechuga-Devéze, CH. Dinoflagellates in recent sediments from Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California. Bot. Mar 2003, 46, 132–141. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Erler, K; Muñetón-Gómez, MS; Luckas, B; Tripp-Quezada, A. Paralytic shellfish toxins in the chocolata clam, Megapitaria squalida (Bivalvia: Veneridae), in Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California. Rev. Biol. Trop 2004, 52, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; López-Cortés, DJ; Hernández-Sandoval, F; Erler, K; Luckas, B. Paralytic shellfish toxin profiles in net phytoplankton samples from Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar. Poll. Bull 2006, 52, 800–815. [Google Scholar]
  17. Band-Schmidt, CJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, J; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Lechuga-Devéze, CH; Reinhard, K; Luckas, B. Paralytic shellfish toxin profile in strains of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum Graham and the scallop Argopecten ventricosus G. B. Sowerby II from Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California, Mexico. Harmful Algae 2005, 4, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  18. López-Cortés, DJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Gárate-Lizárraga, I. Unusual mortality of Krill (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) in Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California. Pac. Sci 2006, 60, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  19. López-Cortés, DJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Hernández-Sandoval, F. Dos eventos de mareas rojas durante el monitoreo de nutrientes en dos granjas atuneras. Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November; CICESE-CETMAR: Ensenada, Mexico, 2007; p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Band-Schmidt, CJ; López-Cortés, D; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Erler, K. Bloom of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta in Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California (june-july 2006). Harmful Algae News 2007, 33, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hernández-Sandoval, F; Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Band-Schmidt, C; López-Cortés, D; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ. Paralytic toxins in bivalve mollusks during a proliferation of Gymodinium catenatumin Bahía de La Paz, Mexico. Hidrobiológica 2009, 19, 245–256. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Grayeb-del Alamo, T. A multi-species microalgae bloom in Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California, Mexico (June 2008). CICIMAR Oceánides 2009, 24, 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Alonso-Rodríguez, R. Mareas rojas durante 1997 en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa 1997, 15, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  24. Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Páez-Osuna, F. Nutrients, phytoplankton and harmful algal blooms in shrimp ponds: a review with special reference to the situation in the Gulf of California. Aquaculture 2003, 219, 317–336. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mee, LD; Ramírez-Flores, A; Flores-Verdugo, F; González-Frías, F. Coastal upwelling and fertility of the Southern Gulf of California: Impact of the 1982–83 ENSO event. Trop. Ocean-Atmos. Newsletter 1985, 31, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morey-Gaines, G. Gymnodinium catenatum Graham (Dinophyceae): morphology and affinities with armoured forms. Phycologia 1982, 21, 154–163. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Núñez-Pastén, A. Registros de mareas rojas en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sin., México. Rev. Invest. Cient. UABCS 1991, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Alonso-Rodríguez, R. Ocurrencia de mareas rojas y calidad del agua en la zona sur de la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. MSc Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramírez-Camarena, C; Cortés-Altamirano, R; Muñoz-Cabrera, L. Mareas rojas provocadas por el dinoflagelado Gymnodinium catenatum (Gymnodinales: Gymnodiniaceae) en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sin., México, en 1997. Rev. Biol. Trop 1999, 47, 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  30. Acevedo-Medina, G. Concentración y variación de la composición bioquímica de las biotoxinas del tipo PSP en el ostión de roca Striostrea prismatica Gray, 1825 (=Ostrea iridescens Hanley, 1854) en la Bahía de Mazatlán. BSc Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Sierra-Beltrán, A. Fish mortality associated with Chattonella marina and C. cf. ovata (Raphidophyceae) blooms in Sinaloa (Mexico). Harmful Algae News 2006, 31, 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Poot-Delgado, CA. Estructura de la comunidad fitoplanctónica con énfasis en las especies tóxicas y/o nocivas de la laguna de Macapule, Sinaloa. MSc thesis, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-IPN, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Siqueiros-Beltrones, DA. Infection of Ceratium furca by the parasitic dinoflagellate Amoebophrya ceratii (Amoebophridae) in the Mexican Pacific. Acta Bot. Mex 2003, 65, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Verdugo-Díaz, G; Muñetón-Gómez, MS; Félix-Pico, EF. Dinoflagelados (Dinophyceae) del sistema lagunar Magdalena-Almejas. In Estudios Ecológicos de Bahía Magdalena; Funes-Rodríguez, R, Gómez-Gutiérrez, J, Palomares-García, R, Eds.; Instituto Politécnico Nacional: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007; pp. 145–174. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gómez-Villarreal, MC; Durán-Salgueiro, L. Presencia de Gymnodinium catenatum en Bahía de Banderas (Nayarit-Jalisco). Resúmenes XII Reunión Nacional de la Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología, Xalapa, Mexico, 6–9 May 2002; Universidad Veracruzana: Xalapa, Mexico, 2002. (compactdisk ). [Google Scholar]
  36. Castillo-Barrera, E; García-Murillo, A. Relación de organismos planctónicos presentes en florecimientos algales nocivos en Bahía de Matachen, San Blas, Nayarit. Recursos y Medio Ambiente: Memorias del XIV Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Nuevo Vallarta, Mexico, 29–31 October 2007. (compact disk).
  37. Gómez-Villarreal, MC; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ. Toxinas paralizantes en ostión de piedra, Crassostrea iridescens en Bahía de Banderas. Recursos y Medio Ambiente: Memorias del XIV Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Nuevo Vallarta, 29–31 October 2007; Mexico, 2007. (compact disk). [Google Scholar]
  38. Figueroa-Torres, MG; Zepeda-Esquivel, MA. Mareas rojas del puerto interior, Colima, México. Scientia Naturae 2001, 3, 39–52. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ortíz-Lira, JH; Jiménez-Quiroz, MdC. Registros de eventos de Marea Roja en Manzanillo, Colima (1986–2004). In Los Recursos Pesqueros y Acuícolas de Jalisco, Colima y Michoacán; Jiménez-Quiróz, MdC, Espino-Barr, E, Eds.; SAGARPA, INP, and CRIP Manzanillo: Mexico, 2006; pp. 324–334. [Google Scholar]
  40. Blanco-Blanco, M; Aguilar-Olguín, S; Morales-Blake, A. Caracterización de una marea roja en la Bahía de Manzanillo, Colima, México. Libro de resúmenes VIII Congreso Latinoamericano sobre Ciencias del Mar, Trujillo, Peru, 17–21 October 1999; Tresierra-Aguilar, AE, Culquichicón-Malpica, ZG, Eds.; Trujillo, Peru, 1999; pp. 338–339. [Google Scholar]
  41. Morales-Blake, A; Hernández-Becerril, DU; Cavazos-Guerra, C. Registros de mareas rojas en las bahías de Manzanillo, Colima, México. In Estudios sobre Plancton en México y el Caribe; Ríos-Jara, E, Juárez-Carrillo, E, Pérez-Peña, M, López-Linares, E, Robles-Jarero, EG, Hernández-Becerril, DU, Silva-Briano, M, Eds.; Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología y Universidad de Guadalajara:Guadalajara: Mexico, 2000; pp. 81–82. [Google Scholar]
  42. González-Chan, RB; Hernández-Silva, L; Navarro-Ornelas, JG; Blanco-Padilla, MA. Proliferación algal nociva en las Bahías del Puerto de Manzanillo, Colima (marzo-mayo 2007). Recursos y Medio Ambiente: Memorias del XIV Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Nuevo Vallarta, Mexico, 29–31 october 2007; 2007. (compact disk). [Google Scholar]
  43. Zepeda-Esquivel, MA; Meave del Castillo, ME. FAN de dinoflagelados en Manzanillo, Col., durante abril-mayo del 2007. II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November; CICESE-CETMAR: Ensenada, B.C., Mexico, 2007; p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gómez-Aguirre, S. Eventos de hemotalasia en México: el caso observado en la Bahía de Banderas (Abril, 2001). Rev. Esp. Cienc. Quím.-Biol 2003, 6, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Licea, S; Gómez-Aguirre, S; Cortés-Altamirano, R; Gómez, S. Notas sobre algunos florecimientos algales y la presencia de especies tóxicas en cinco localidades del Pacífico Mexicano (1996–1999). VIII Congreso Latinoamericano sobre Ciencias del Mar, Trujillo, Peru, 17–21 October 1999; pp. 335–337.
  46. Mancilla-Cabrera, E; Ramírez-Camarena, C; Muñoz-Cabrera, L. Primer registro de Gymnodinium catenatum Graham (Gymnodiniaceae) como causante de marea roja en la Bahía de Acapulco, Gro., México. In Estudios sobre el plancton marino en México y el Caribe; Ríos-Jara, R, Juárez-Carrillo, E, Pérez-Peña, M, López-Iriarte, E, Robles-Jarero, EG, Hernández-Becerril, DU, Silva-Briano, M, Eds.; Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología y Universidad de Guadalajara: Guadalajara, Mexico, 2000; pp. 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Pérez-Cruz, B; Díaz-Ortíz, J; Band-Schmidt, CJ. Microalgas y biotoxinas marinas en costas mexicanas. Conversus 2008, 9, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Díaz-Ortíz, J; Pérez-Cruz, B; Alarcón-Tacuba, M; Alarcón-Romero, MA; Salgado-Sales, P; López-Silva, S. Florecimientos de Cochlodinium polykrikoides y Gymnodinium catenatum en la Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, México (2005–2008). Resúmenes del III Taller sobre Florecimiento Algales Nocivos, Acapulco, Mexico, November, 2009; 2009; p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  49. Saldate-Castañeda, O; Vázquez-Castellanos, JL; Galván, J; Sánchez-Anguiano, A; Nazar, A. Poisoning from paralytic shellfish toxins in Oaxaca, Mexico. Sal. Pub. Mex 1991, 33, 240–247. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ronsón-Paulín, JA. Análisis retrospectivo y posibles causas de mareas rojas tóxicas en el litoral del sureste mexicano (Guerrero, Oaxaca, Chiapas). Ciencia y Mar 1999, 9, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  51. Herrera-Galindo, JE. Presencia de dinoflagelados potencialmente tóxicos en la zona aledaña a la desembocadura del río Copalita, Huatulco, Oaxaca. Resúmenes XII Congreso Nacional de Oceanografía, Huatulco, Mexico, 22–26 May 2000; p. 151.
  52. Herrera-Galindo, JE. Presencia de Gymnodinium catenatum Graham (1943) en la zona costera de Bahía de Huatulco-Puerto Escondido, Oaxaca, México (octubre de 1998). Resúmenes VII Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar, Campeche, Mexico, 13–15 November 2000; p. 90.
  53. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Díaz-Ortíz, J; Alarcón, M; Pérez-Cruz, B; Torres-Jaramillo, A; Alarcón-Romero, MA; López-Silva, S. Monitoreo de florecimientos algales nocivos y de toxinas paralizantes en las costas de Guerrero y Oaxaca (1992–2007). Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November 2007; p. 7.
  54. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Sierra-Beltrán, AP; Cortés-Lara, MC. Dominance and permanence of species of harmful algae forming blooms in Mazatlán Bay, Mexico (1979–2002). In Harmful Algae 2002; Steidinger, KA, Landsberg, JH, Tomas, RC, Vargo, GA, Eds.; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Institute of Oceanography, and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  55. Manrique, FA; Molina, RE. Presencia de mareas rojas en la Bahía de Bacochibampo, Guaymas, Sonora, México. Hidrobiologica 1997, 7, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cabrera-Mancilla, E; Ramírez-Camarena, C; Muñoz-Cabrera, L; Monreal-Prado, A. Primer registro de Gymnodinium catenatum Graham (Gymnodinaceae) como causante de marea roja en la Bahía de Acapulco, Gro. México. In Estudios sobre plancton en México y el Caribe; Ríos-Jara, E, Juárez-Carrillo, E, Pérez-Peña, M, López-Linares, E, Robles-Jarero, EG, Hernández-Becerril, DU, Silva-Briano, M, Eds.; Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología y Universidad de Guadalajara: Guadalajara, Mexico, 2000; pp. 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  57. Góngora-González, D. Estructura microfitoplanctónica y condiciones hidrológicas relacionadas con la presencia de dinoflagelados tóxicos en Bahía Concepción, B. C. S., México. BSc Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, B. C. S., Mexico, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  58. Smayda, TJ. Harmful algal blooms: Their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Limnol. Oceanogr 1997, 42, 1137–1153. [Google Scholar]
  59. Smayda, TJ. Ecological features of harmful algae blooms in coastal upwelling ecosystems. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci 2000, 22, 219–253. [Google Scholar]
  60. Anderson, DM; Gilbert, PM; Burkholder, JM. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrients sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 2002, 25, 704–726. [Google Scholar]
  61. Granéli, E. Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms. In Drainage Basin Nutrient Inputs and Eutrophication: An Integral Approach; Wassmann, P, Olli, K, Eds.; University of Troms⊘: Troms⊘, Norway, 2005; Volume Chapter 7, pp. 99–112. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hodgkiss, IJ; Ho, KC. Are changes in N:P ratios in coastal waters the key to increased red tide blooms? Hydrobiologia 1997, 352, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pinckney, JL; Paerle, HW; Tester, P; Richardson, TL. The role of nutrient loading and eutrophication in estuarine ecology. Environ. Health Persp 2001, 109, 699–706. [Google Scholar]
  64. Beman, MJ; Arrigo, KR; Matson, PA. Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean. Nature 2005, 434, 211–214. [Google Scholar]
  65. Heisler, J; Gilbert, PM; Burkholder, JM; Anderson, DM; Cochlan, W; Dennison, WC; Dortch, A; Gobler, CJ; Heil, CA; Humphies, E; et al. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus. Harmful Algae 2008, 8, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  66. Herrera-Silveira, JA; Morales-Ojeda, SM. Evaluation of the health status of coastal ecosystem in southeast Mexico: Assessment of water quality, phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation. Mar. Poll. Bull 2009, 59, 72–86. [Google Scholar]
  67. Álvarez-Borrego, S; Lara-Lara, JR. The Physical Environment and Primary Productivity of the Gulf of California. In The Gulf and Peninsular Province of the California; Dauphin, JP, Simoneit, BRT, Eds.; American Association of Petroleum Geologists: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1991; Volume 47, pp. 555–567. [Google Scholar]
  68. Páez-Osuna, F; Gracia, A; Flores-Verdugo, F; Lyle-Fritch, LP; Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Roque, A; Ruíz-Fernández, AC. Shrimp aquaculture development and the environment in the Gulf of California ecoregion. Mar. Poll. Bull 2003, 46, 806–815. [Google Scholar]
  69. Badan-Dangon, A; Koblinski, DJ; Baumgartner, T. Spring and summer in the Gulf of California: Observation of surface thermal patterns. Oceanol. Acta 1985, 8, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bray, NA. Thermohaline circulation in the Gulf of California. J. Geophys. Res 1988, 93, 4993–5020. [Google Scholar]
  71. Santamaría-del-Ángel, E; Álvarez-Borrego, S; Muller-Karger, FE. The 1982–1984 El Niño in the Gulf of California as seen in coastal zone color scanner imagery. J. Geophys. Res 1994, 99, 7423–7431. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lavín, MF; Beire, E; Badan, A. Contribuciones a la Oceanografía Física en México. Monografía #3; Estructura hidrográfica y circulación del Golfo de California: escalas estacional e interanual; Lavín, MF, Ed.; Unión de Geofísica Mexicana: Ensenada, Mexico, 1997; pp. 141–171. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kahru, M; Marinone, SG; Lluch-Cota, SE; Pares-Sierra, A; Greg-Mitchell, B. Ocean-color variability in the Gulf of California: scales from days to ENSO. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 2004, 51, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  74. Morquecho-Escamilla, ML. Fitoplancton tóxico y actividad de ficotoxinas en la almeja catarina Argopecten circularis (Sowerby, 1835) en Bahía Concepción, Golfo de California. MSc thesis, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  75. Morquecho, L; Lechuga-Devéze, CH. Seasonal occurrence of planktonic dinoflagellates and cyst production in relationship to environmental variables in subtropical Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California. Bot. Mar 2004, 47, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  76. Blackburn, SI; Hallegraeff, GM; Bolch, CJ. Vegetative reproduction and sexual life cycle of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum Graham from Tasmania, Australia. J. Phycol 1989, 25, 577–590. [Google Scholar]
  77. Bravo, I; Anderson, DM. The effects of temperature, growth medium and darkness on excystment and growth of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum from northwest Spain. J. Plank. Res 1994, 16, 513–525. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Hernández-Becerril, DU; Luna-Soria, R. Red Tides in Mexico: A Review. In Harmful and Toxic Algal Blooms; Yasumoto, T, Oshima, Y, Fukuyo, Y, Eds.; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Paris, France, 1996; pp. 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  79. Cortés-Altamirano, R. Observaciones de mareas rojas en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. Cienc. Mar 1987, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  80. Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Ochoa, JL. Hydrology of winter-spring “red tides” in Bahía de Mazatán, Sinaloa, México. Harmful Algae 2004, 3, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  81. Flores-Trujillo, JG; Helenes, J; Herguera, JC; Orellana-Zepeda, E. Palynological record (1483–1994) of Gymnodinium catenatum in Pescadero Basin, southern Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar. Micropal 2009, 73, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  82. Cortés-Altamirano, R; Hernández-Becerril, DU; Luna-Soria, R. Evaluación y prevención de los efectos de las mareas rojas en la Bahía de Mazatlán (1994). Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa 1995, 14, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  83. Aguirre-Gómez, R; Álvarez, R; Salmerón-García, O. Red tide evolution in the Mazatlán Bay area from remotely sensed sea surface temperatures. Geof. Int 1999, 38, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  84. Alonso-Rodríguez, R. Hidrología y condiciones ambientales que determinan la proliferación de dinoflagelados causantes de marea roja en la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. DSc Thesis, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  85. Wyrki, K. Surface Currents the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Inter. Trop. Tuna Comm. Bull 1965, 95(5), 269–304. [Google Scholar]
  86. Gómez-Gutiérrez, J; Palomares-García, R; Gendron, D. Community structure of the euphauisiid population along the west coast of Baja California, Mexico, during the weak ENSO 1986–1987. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 1995, 120, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hernández-Trujillo, S. Variability of community structure of Copepoda related to El Niño 1982–83 and 1987–88 along the west coast of Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Fish. Oceanogr 1999, 8(4), 284–295. [Google Scholar]
  88. Félix-Uraga, R; Gómez-Muñoz, VM; Quiñónez-Vázquez, C; Melo-Barrera, FL; García-Franco, W. On the existence of Pacific sardine groups off the west coast of Baja California and southern California. Calif. Coop. Ocean Fish Invest. Rep 2004, 45, 146–151. [Google Scholar]
  89. Gómez-Gutiérrez, J; Martínez-Gómez, S; Robinson, CJ. Influence of termo-haline fronts forced by tide on near-surface zooplankton aggregation and community structure in Bahía Magdalena, Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 2007, 346, 109–125. [Google Scholar]
  90. Blasco, D. Red tide in the upwelling region of Baja California. Limnol. Oceanog 1977, 22, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dickman, M; Zhang, F. Mid-ocean exchange of container vessel ballast water. 2: effects of vessel type in the transport of diatoms and dinoflagellates from Manzanillo, Mexico, to Hong Kong, China. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser 1999, 176, 253–262. [Google Scholar]
  92. Olivos-Ortíz, A; Sosa-Avalos, R; Torres-Orozco, E; Silva-Iñiguez, L; Galicia-Pérez, MA; Gaviño-Rodríguez, JH. Influencia de las descargas de agua continental en la concentración de nutrientes en las Bahías de Santiago y Manzanillo, Colima. Iridia 2008, 5, 15–16. [Google Scholar]
  93. Olivos-Ortíz, A; Quijano-Scheggia, SI; García-Uribe, G; Galicia-Pérez, MA; Gaviño-Rodríguez, JH. Distribución de los principales grupos de fitoplancton en las costas del estado de Colima durante el 2002. Rev. Cien. Tecnol. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez 2005, 3, 13–28. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rodríguez-Palacio, MC; Lozano-Ramírez, C; Álvarez-Hernández, S; de Lara-Isassi, G. Registro de dos florecimientos algales nocivos (FAN) en las costas del Pacífico Mexicano. Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November 2007; CICESE-CETMAR: Ensenada, Mexico, 2007; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
  95. Nava-Sánchez, E. Riesgo geológico en la zona costera de la Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero. In Informe Técnico, Consejo de Recursos Minerales; Mexico City, Mexico, 2003; pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  96. Palacios-Salgado, DS. Asociación de peces en los arrecifes rocosos de la Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, México. MSc, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, B. C. S., Mexico, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  97. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Díaz-Ortíz, J; Pérez-Cruz, B; Alarcón-Tacuba, M; Alarcón-Romero, MA; López-Silva, S. Cochlodinium polykrikoides and Gymnodinium catenatum in Bahía de Acapulco, Mexico 2005–2008. Harmful Algae News 2009, 40, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  98. Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, J; Ramírez-Camarena, C; Hernández-Sandoval, F. Perfiles cromatográficos de toxinas paralizantes en moluscos bivalvos asociados a Pyrodinium bahamense var. compressum en el Pacífico Sur Mexicano. Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Ensenada, Mexico, 21–23 November 2007; p. 18.
  99. Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Ochoa, JL; Uribe-Alcocer, M. Grazing of heterotrophic dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans (McCartney) Kofoid on Gymnodinium catenatum Graham. Rev. Lat. Microbiol 2005, 47, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  100. Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Hernández-Sandoval, FE; Band-Schmidt, CJ; López-Cortés, DJ; Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Gárate-Lizárraga, I. Grazing of the dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans on Gymnodinium catenatum: a laboratory study. Cienc. Mar 2010. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  101. Palomares-García, R; Bustillos-Guzmán, J; Band-Schmidt, CJ; López-Cortés, D; Luckas, B. Effect of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum on the grazing, egg production, and hatching success of the copepod Acartia clausi. Cienc. Mar 2006, 32, 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  102. Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Morquecho, L; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Erler, K; Luckas, B; Reyes-Salinas, A; Góngora-González, DT. Comparative paralytic shellfish toxin profiles in the strains of Gymnodinium catenatum Graham from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar. Poll. Bull 2005, 50, 208–236. [Google Scholar]
  103. Band-Schmidt, CJ; Morquecho, L; Lechuga-Devéze, C; Anderson, DM. Effects of growth medium, temperature, salinity and seawater source on the growth of Gymnodinium catenatum (Dinophyceae) from Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California. J. Plank. Res 2004, 26, 1459–1470. [Google Scholar]
  104. Band-Schmidt, CJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, J; Morquecho, L; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Reyes-Salinas, A; Erler, K; Luckas, B. Variations of PSP toxin profiles during different growth phases in Gymnodinium catenatum (Dinophyceae) strains isolated from three locations in the Gulf of California, Mexico. J. Phycol 2006, 42, 757–768. [Google Scholar]
  105. Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ; Band-Schmidt, CJ; López-Cortés, DJ; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Núñez-Vázquez, E; Hernández-Sandoval, F. Variations in growth and toxicity in Gymnodinium catenatum Graham from the Gulf of California under different ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus. Harmful Algae 2010. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wright, JLC. Review: Dealing with seafood toxins: present approaches and future options. Food Res. Int 1995, 28, 347–358. [Google Scholar]
  107. Oshima, Y; Sugino, K; Hirota, M; Yasumoto, T. Comparative studies on paralytic shellfish toxin profiles of dinoflagellates and bivalves. In Toxic Marine Phytoplankton; Granéli, E, Sundstr⊘m, B, Elder, L, Anderson, DM, Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  108. Pérez-Cruz, B. Tasa de acumulación y depuración de toxinas paralíticas producidas por Gymnodinium catenatum (1943) en la almeja chocolata Megapitaria squalida (Sowerby, 1835). MSc Thesis, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-IPN, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  109. Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Hernández-Sandoval, F; Heredia-Tapia, A; Ochoa, JL; Band-Schmidt, CJ; López-Cortés, D; Gárate-Lizárraga, I; Bustillos-Guzmán, J. Presence of paralytic toxins in the puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus from Bahía de La Paz and Arothron meleagris from Punta Pericos, B. C. S. Resúmenes XV Reunión de la Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología A. C. VIII International Meeting of the Mexican Society of Planktology Centro Cultural Iztacala, Estado de México, Mexico, 20–24 April 2009; Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; p. 20.
  110. Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Cordero-Tapia, A; Ochoa, JL; Bustillos-Guzmán, J. Histopatología por exposición aguda a las Biotoxinas Marinas de importancia en Salud Pública en México. In Resúmenes XVII Congreso Nacional de Patología Veterinaria. Sociedad Mexicana de Patólogos Veterinarios A.C; Candanosa-Aranda, E, Ed.; Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico, 2008; pp. 518–524. [Google Scholar]
  111. Pérez-Linares, J; Ochoa, JL; Gago-Martínez, A. Effects of PSP toxins in white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931. Tox. Chem. Food Saf 2008, 73, 671–673. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pérez-Linares, J; Ochoa, JL; Gago-Martínez, A. Retention and tissue damage of PSP and NSP toxins in shrimp: Is cultured shrimp a potential vector of toxins to human population? Toxicon 2009, 53, 185–195. [Google Scholar]
  113. Demaret, A; Sohet, K; Houvenaghel, G. Effects of toxic dinoflagellates on the feeding and mortality of Artemia franciscana larvae. In Harmful Marine Algal Blooms; Lassus, P, Arzul, G, Erard, E, Gentien, P, Marcaillou, C, Eds.; Lavoisier, Intercept: Paris, France, 1995; pp. 427–432. [Google Scholar]
  114. Tan, ZJ; Yan, T; You, PC; Zhou, MJ. Transfer of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins via Marine Foods Chains: A Simulated experiment. Biomed. Environ. Sci 2007, 20, 235–241. [Google Scholar]
  115. Estrada, N; Lagos, N; García, C; Maeda-Martínez, AN; Ascencio, F. Effect of the toxic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium catenatum on uptake and fate of paralytic shellfish poisons in the Pacific giant lion-paw scallop Nodipecten subnodosus. Mar. Biol 2007, 151, 1205–1204. [Google Scholar]
  116. MacQuarrie, SP; Bricelj, VM. Behavioral and physiological responses to PSP toxins in softshell clam, Mya arenaria, populations in relation to the history of exposure to red tides. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser 2008, 336, 59–74. [Google Scholar]
  117. Bricelj, VM; Shumway, SE. Paralytic shellfish toxins in bivalve molluscs: occurrence, transfer kinetics, and biotransformation. Rev. Fish. Sci 1998, 6, 315–383. [Google Scholar]
  118. Estrada, N; Romero, MJ; Campa-Córdova, A; Luna, A; Ascencio, F. Effect of the toxic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium catenatum on the hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes, in tissues of the giant lion-paw scallop Nodipecten subnodosus. Comp. Bioch. Phys. Part C 2007, 146, 502–510. [Google Scholar]
  119. Estrada, N; Rodríguez-Jaramillo, C; Contreras, G; Ascencio, F. Effects of induced paralysis on hemocytes and tissues of the giant lions-paw scallop by paralyzing shellfish poison. Mar. Biol 2010, 157, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar]
  120. Heredia-Tapia, A; Campa-Córdova, AI; Band-Schmidt, CJ; Núñez-Vázquez, EJ; Bustillos-Guzmán, JJ. Lipid peroxidation in the bivalve mollusks Dosinia ponderosa and Crassostrea gigas exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum. resúmenes XVI Reunión de la Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología A.C. y IX International Meeting of the Mexican Society of Planktology, La Paz, Mexico, 2010; p. 57.
  121. Alonso-Rodríguez, R; Páez-Osuna, F; Gárate-Lizárraga, I. El fitoplancton en la camaronicultura y larvicultura: importancia de un buen manejo; Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Comité Estatal de Sanidad Acuícola de Sinaloa: Mexico, 2004a. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sierra-Beltrán, AP; Lluch-Cota, DB; Lluch-Cota, SE; Cortés-Altamirano, R; Cortés-Lara, MC; Castillo-Chávez, M; Carrillo, L; Pacas, L; Vázquez, R; García-Hansen, I. Dinámica espacio-temporal de organismos precursores de mareas rojas en la costa Pacífica de América del Norte y Centroamérica. Rev. Biol. Trop 2004, 52, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  123. Barraza-Guardado, R; Cortés-Altamirano, R; Sierra-Beltrán, A. Marine die-offs from Chattonella marina and Ch. cf. ovata in Kun Kaak Bay, Sonora in the Gulf of California. Harmful Algae News 2004, 25, 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  124. Band-Schmidt, CJ; Rojas-Posadas, D; Morquecho, L; Hernández-Saavedra, NY. Heterogeneity of LSU rDNA sequences and morphology of Gymnodinium catenatum strains in Bahía Concepción, Gulf of California, Mexico. J. Plank. Res 2008, 30, 755–763. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 08 01935f1 1024
Figure 1. A map of Mexico showing coastal areas where Gymnodinium catenatum has been registered. Dark circle: first report; (1) Punta Colnett; (2) Bahía de Los Ángeles; (3) Bahía Concepción; (4) Bahía de La Paz; (5) Bahía Magdalena-Almejas; (6) Puerto Libertad; (7) Bahía Kun Kaak; (8) Bahía Bacochibampo; (9) Laguna de Macapule; (10) Cruz de Elota; (11) Punta Piaxtla; (12) Bahía de Mazatlán; (13) Teacapan; (14–15) Bahía Banderas and Puerto Vallarta; (16) Bahía de Manzanillo; (17) Lázaro Cárdenas; (18) Bahía de Acapulco;( 19) Laguna Corralero-Alotengo;( 20) Puerto Escondido;( 21) Salina Cruz.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. A map of Mexico showing coastal areas where Gymnodinium catenatum has been registered. Dark circle: first report; (1) Punta Colnett; (2) Bahía de Los Ángeles; (3) Bahía Concepción; (4) Bahía de La Paz; (5) Bahía Magdalena-Almejas; (6) Puerto Libertad; (7) Bahía Kun Kaak; (8) Bahía Bacochibampo; (9) Laguna de Macapule; (10) Cruz de Elota; (11) Punta Piaxtla; (12) Bahía de Mazatlán; (13) Teacapan; (14–15) Bahía Banderas and Puerto Vallarta; (16) Bahía de Manzanillo; (17) Lázaro Cárdenas; (18) Bahía de Acapulco;( 19) Laguna Corralero-Alotengo;( 20) Puerto Escondido;( 21) Salina Cruz.
Marinedrugs 08 01935f1 1024
Table Table 1. Reports of Gymnodinium catenatum along the Pacifi ccoast of Mexico.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Reports of Gymnodinium catenatum along the Pacifi ccoast of Mexico.
RegionYearLocalityAbundance (cells L−1)Toxicity (μg STXeq per 100 g−1) and bivalve speciesTemperature (ºC)Ref
Gulf of California1939N Gulf of California1 × 106nd14.0–17.0[1]
1981Puerto Libertad190 × 103ndnd[9]
2003Bahía Kun KaakNdnd25.32 ± 0.99[10]
2006Bahía de Los ÁngelesNd3–54
Nodipecten subnodosus
16.0–23.0[11]
1990Bahía Concepción1.8 × 102–3 × 103ndnd[12]
19995.7 × 105298
Argopecten ventricosus
18.0–25.0[13]
2000500–4 × 10463
A. ventricosus
18.0–25.0[13,14]
1997–1998Bahía de La Paz1.60 × 10–2.6 × 1020.14–5.46
Megapitaria squalida
18.0–26.0[15]
2001Nd2–67
A. ventricosus
PST in net
phytoplankton samples
22.0–26.0[16,17]
20031–1.20 × 103nd18.0–22.0[16,18]
20061.0–3.6 × 1033–4.5 M. squalida
4–9
Dosinia ponderosa
18.5–26.5[19,20]
20076–2.39 × 1060.40–37.74
M. squalida, M. aurantiaca, D. ponderosa. Modiolus capax, Pinna rugosa, P. multicostata
20.0–21.9[21]
20088–79 × 103nd20.0–24.0[22]
1995–1996Shrimp culture pond, Sinaloa???[23]
199715 × 10340
Crassostrea iridescens.
Nauplii and adult mortality of L. vannamei
nd[15,24]
200118–528 × 10329 oyster
Nauplii mortality of L. stylirostris. No toxins detected in nauplii
nd[23]
1979*Cruz de Elota, Punta Piaxtla, Bahía de Mazatlán, and Teacapan, Sinaloa240–6.6 × 106〈20–7640
C. iridescens and Donax sp. extensive fish
21.60[7,25,26]
1981Bahía de Mazatlán35–544 × 103nd19.74–20.52[9]
198565 × 103nd22.04[9,27]
1986170–940 × 103nd20.64–22.34
1988**1000 × 10320.94
1994–19951.2–2.2 × 105nd21.14–22.54[28]
19963856–5000 × 103nd21.0–32.9[23]
19973856–5000 × 103〈35
Ostrea iridescens
nd[29]
20011.5–196 × 10339.40
C. iridescens
16.5–25.0[9,15]
2003–200471–115 × 10363–131519.0–24.0[30]
2006148 × 103nd21.2–22.7[31]
2005Laguna de Macapule38.8 × 103ndnd[32]
W. Coast of B. California Peninsula1996West Coast of Baja California1.2–4.2 × 102nd13.0–17.0[33]
2005–2006?Bahía Magdalena-AlmejasPresence in net phytoplankton samplesnegative
Anadara tuberculosa
nd[34]
Central Mexican Pacific1979San Blas and Puerto VallartaNd〈20
Crassosstrea cortesiensis
nd[25,35]
2005Bahía de Matachén1010 × 103ndnd[36]
1999Bahía de Manzanillo (Puerto Interior)2.5–3.8 × 10611–13
C. iridescens
nd[37,38]
1989Bahía de Manzanillo and Santiago5000 × 103ndnd[39]
2002832 × 103ndnd
2000Bahía de Manzanillo>3500 × 103235
Oyster
23.0–25.0[40,41]
2007Bahía Banderas3.53 × 103–3.8 × 10629–235.28
C. iridescens
nd[42,43]
2001450–2134 × 10311–13
C. iridescens
23.0[37, 44]
1999Bahía de Acapulco0.01–78 × 106120–209
O. iridescens
nd[45,46]
20056.29 × 10325–217nd[47]
200610 × 106112nd[4749]
20073 × 103–13 × 1061152nd
South Mexican Pacific1989Salina Cruz to ChiapasNdPresence of PSPnd[50]
1998Puerto Escondido to Huatulco4–10 × 106〈80nd[51,52]
2001Laguna Corralero-Alotengo, OaxacaNd24–1456
Mussel
nd[53]
2006Gulf of Tehuantepec, Coasts of Salina Cruz13 × 103ndnd[38]

nd, not determined;*19 people intoxicated with three human deaths;**10 intoxicated people.

Table Table 2. Paralytic toxin profile in phytoplankton samples from different embayments of the Gulf of California.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Paralytic toxin profile in phytoplankton samples from different embayments of the Gulf of California.
ToxinBahía de MazatlánBahía ConcepciónBahía de La Paz
2001 Apr2001 May200220022007
18 Jan30 Jan14 Feb6 Mar17 Apr2 May21 May8 Jul15 Mar12 Mar20 Aug7 Mar
STX64.3----1.0-3.2-34.6-1.40–31
neoSXT--------7.8----0–25
GTX2--------9.0----0–5.4
GTX3--------2.6----0–3.6
dcSTX17.49.062.98.3-
dcGTX222.62.078.247.388.673.966.870.21.672.837.037.152.5-
dcGTX327.43.621.825.811.426.118.529.80.427.212.0-18.50–1.1
B 14.4----0.8---7.4-5.70–5.4
B 2-1.0----
C 1-16.0--9.4-62.6---10.50–37.0
C 250.07.4-10.9--2.5-12.8---3.253.8–68.9
1.5 ng STXeq cell−1

nd = no data. References [1517,21].

Table Table 3. Average toxin profile (% mol) of Gymnodinium catenatum strains isolated from the Gulf of Californiaunder different growth conditions.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Average toxin profile (% mol) of Gymnodinium catenatum strains isolated from the Gulf of Californiaunder different growth conditions.
Strain OriginMediaSTXneoSTXGTX2GTX3dcSTXdcGTX2dcGTX3B 1B 2C 3C 1C 2C 4
BACOGSe0–0.66.6–12.1ndnd2.1–2.83.3–4.70.9–1.40.7–0.93.7–7.61.6–2.950.9–55.918.6–22.80.1–0.6
BAPAZ0–0.825.7–35.26.3–24.21.6–2.90.5–0.90.4–0.84.1–12.91.6–7.119.7–33.17.0–15.20–2.7
BAMAZ0.1–0.629.2–46.31.1–3.42.2–3.80.7–1.40.2–0.47.5–15.32.3–4.323.7–31.78.6–13.50.5–1.7
BACOf/2nd0–5.10–0.30–0.119.4–43.219.3–43.16.5–11.70–0.20–1.5nd12.8–39.94.6–38.7nd

BACO, Bahía Concepción; BAPAZ, Bahía de La Paz; BAMAZ, Bahía de Mazatlán. nd, not detected. References [17,104].

Table Table 4. Toxin profile (mol%) in different mollusk species related to the presence of Gymnodinium catenatum.

Click here to display table

Table 4. Toxin profile (mol%) in different mollusk species related to the presence of Gymnodinium catenatum.
ToxinBahía Concepción
Argopecten ventricosus
May 99, 00, 01
Bahía de Mazatlán
Crassostrea iridescens
April, 01
Bahía de La Paz
Megapitaria squalida
Dec, 01–Aug, 02
STX0–0.92-0–38.69
neoSXT0–9.005.71-
GTX20–31.17-0–41.19
GTX30–4.790.890–16.02
dcSTX0–41.6218.540–62.90
dcGTX20–40.672.520–52.45
dcGTX30–59.333.210–39.77
B 10–42.349.800–7.40
B 20–1.941.91-
C 10–54.6137.890–52.54
C 20–47.7219.500–35.07
C30–3.32--
C40–3.98--

References [15,17].

Table Table 5. Toxin profile of Gymnodinium catenatumstrains and their effect on different organisms.

Click here to display table

Table 5. Toxin profile of Gymnodinium catenatumstrains and their effect on different organisms.
Organism testedStrainCulture conditionsTotal toxicity (pgSTXeq cell−1 or μg eq. STX)Toxin profileEffectsRef.
MammalsMouse model, Mus musculus (BALB/c and CD1mice)GCCV-6f/2+Se, 33 ‰, 25 ± 1 ºC, 12:12 L:O, 150 μEm2 s−1, Fernbach flasks0.2, 0.3 μg
eq.STX
STX,
dcSTX
GTX-2,3 dcGTX-2,3 C1–2
Clinical signs: dyspnea, paralysis, convulsions, jump, respiratory failure, and death.
In necropsy a pronounced isquemic zone only in liver border was detected. Histopathological changes: cerebellar injury (Purkinje cell degeneration).
[110]
CrustaceansAcartia clausiGCCV-14f/2 + Se 10−8M, 33– 34‰, 20 ºC, 12:12 L:O, 150 μEm2 s−1, 2 L flasks60dcSTX, dcGTX-2, 3,C1–2No adverse effects.[101]
Litopenaeu s vannameiGCCV-6f/2, 33‰, 26 ± 1 ºC, 12:12 L:O, 150 μEm2 s−1, Fernbach flasksndSTX, dcSTX, neoSTX, GTX-1,2,3,4Paralysis of antennae and pereiopods, disequilibrium, atypical swimming. Slow and irregular movements of gills, pleopods, and maxillipeds. Heart and brain severely damaged; juvenile shrimp more susceptible than adult animals.
In chronic exposure: gastric glands and muscle retained paralytic toxins for a longer period, histological damages were observed in the heart, gastric gland, and brain tissue.
[111,112]
MollusksArtemia salina (adults and metanauplii)GSe, 33‰, 23 ± 1 ºC, 12:12 L:O, 150 μEm2 s−1, Fernbach flasksndSTX, dcSTX
GTX-2,3, dcGTX-2,3 C1–2
20% and 10% mortality in adults and metanauplii, respectively. Clinical signs: Adults: erratic swimming (circles), spasms, convulsions, and death. Metanauplii: erratic swimming and death.this study
Nodipecten subnodosusGSe medium, 32‰, 21 ºC, 16:8 L:O, 70
W, 20 L flasks
2–5GTXAt high food concentrations, juvenile showed production of pseudofeces, partial shell valve closure, and reduction in feeding. An increase of antioxidant and hydrolytic enzymes mainly in gills and the digestive gland. Melanization in gills, mantle, and labial palps.[115,116]
Megapitaria squalidaGCCV-7f/2 + Se 10−8M, 33–34‰, 22 ºC, 12:12 L:O, 150 μEm2 s−1, 10 L flasks26–28STX, dcSTX, neoSTX, dcGTX-3, 4, C1–2No adverse effects.[108]

BACO, Bahía Concepción; BAPAZ, Bahía de La Paz; BAMAZ, Bahía de Mazatlán. nd, not detected. References [17,101].

Table Table 6. Growth rate and maximum cell density of Gymnodinium catenatum strains of the Gulf of California in different growth conditions.

Click here to display table

Table 6. Growth rate and maximum cell density of Gymnodinium catenatum strains of the Gulf of California in different growth conditions.
Strain CodeSourceGrowth Rate (div day−1)Maximum Cell Density (Cells mL−1)MediaTemperature (ºc)Salinity (psu)Light Intensity (μmol m2 s−1)Light/Dark CycleRef.
GCCQ-10.74 ± 0.071619 ± 252
GCCV-2BACO0.70 ± 0.071090 ± 270
GCCV-40.82 ± 0.093393 ± 836
GCPV-1BAPAZ0.74 ± 0.061631 ± 152GSe20 ± 13515012,12[104]
GCPV-20.77 ± 0.051421 ± 290
GCMV-1BAMAZ0.81 ± 0.022063 ± 226
GCMV-20.82 ± 0.031865 ± 516
0.14–0.21ndf/2 + Se 10−8 M15–293023010,14
0.24nd26–3015010,14
GCCV-10BACO0.28–0.31nd2028–3815012,12[103]
0.15–0.191559–1970f/2 + Se 10−6, 10−7, 10−8 M3515012,12
Mar. Drugs EISSN 1660-3397 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert