Sensors 2014, 14(2), 3188-3206; doi:10.3390/s140203188

Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer

1,2,* email, 1,2email, 1email, 1,2email and 1,2email
Received: 10 December 2013; in revised form: 24 January 2014 / Accepted: 7 February 2014 / Published: 18 February 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Gait Sensors)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Accelerometer-based activity monitors are popular for monitoring physical activity. In this study, we investigated optimal sensor placement for increasing the quality of studies that utilize accelerometer data to assess physical activity. We performed a two-staged study, focused on sensor location and type of mounting. Ten subjects walked at various walking speeds on a treadmill, performed a deskwork protocol, and walked on level ground, while simultaneously wearing five ProMove2 sensors with a snug fit on an elastic waist belt. We found that sensor location, type of activity, and their interaction-effect affected sensor output. The most lateral positions on the waist belt were the least sensitive for interference. The effect of mounting was explored, by making two subjects repeat the experimental protocol with sensors more loosely fitted to the elastic belt. The loose fit resulted in lower sensor output, except for the deskwork protocol, where output was higher. In order to increase the reliability and to reduce the variability of sensor output, researchers should place activity sensors on the most lateral position of a participant’s waist belt. If the sensor hampers free movement, it may be positioned slightly more forward on the belt. Finally, sensors should be fitted tightly to the body.
Keywords: activity monitoring; waist-mounted; 3D accelerometer; physical activity; ambulatory assessment; calibration; reliability; treadmill; healthcare engineering
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [484 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014 12:32 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Boerema, S.T.; van Velsen, L.; Schaake, L.; Tönis, T.M.; Hermens, H.J. Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer. Sensors 2014, 14, 3188-3206.

AMA Style

Boerema ST, van Velsen L, Schaake L, Tönis TM, Hermens HJ. Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer. Sensors. 2014; 14(2):3188-3206.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boerema, Simone T.; van Velsen, Lex; Schaake, Leendert; Tönis, Thijs M.; Hermens, Hermie J. 2014. "Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer." Sensors 14, no. 2: 3188-3206.

Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert