Next Article in Journal
Advanced Technologies for the Improvement of Spray Application Techniques in Spanish Viticulture: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Active Design Method for the Static Characteristics of a Piezoelectric Six-Axis Force/Torque Sensor
Article Menu

Export Article

Sensors 2014, 14(1), 672-690; doi:10.3390/s140100672

Embedded ARM System for Volcano Monitoring in Remote Areas: Application to the Active Volcano on Deception Island (Antarctica)
Luis Miguel Peci 1,*, Manuel Berrocoso 1, Alberto Fernández-Ros 1, Alicia García 2, José Manuel Marrero 3 and Ramón Ortiz 2
Laboratory of Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science. Campus of Puerto Real, University of Cadiz, Puerto Real 11510, Spain
Institute IGEO, CSIC-UCM. J. Gutierrez Abascal, 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
Volcanic Hazard and Risk Consultant, Los Realejos 38410, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +34-956-012-830; Fax: +34-956-016-288.
Received: 30 September 2013; in revised form: 19 December 2013 / Accepted: 24 December 2013 / Published: 2 January 2014


: This paper describes the development of a multi-parameter system for monitoring volcanic activity. The system permits the remote access and the connection of several modules in a network. An embedded ARM™™ processor has been used, allowing a great flexibility in hardware configuration. The use of a complete Linux solution (Debian™) as Operating System permits a quick, easy application development to control sensors and communications. This provides all the capabilities required and great stability with relatively low energy consumption. The cost of the components and applications development is low since they are widely used in different fields. Sensors and commercial modules have been combined with other self-developed modules. The Modular Volcano Monitoring System (MVMS) described has been deployed on the active Deception Island (Antarctica) volcano, within the Spanish Antarctic Program, and has proved successful for monitoring the volcano, with proven reliability and efficient operation under extreme conditions. In another context, i.e., the recent volcanic activity on El Hierro Island (Canary Islands) in 2011, this technology has been used for the seismic equipment and GPS systems deployed, thus showing its efficiency in the monitoring of a volcanic crisis.
ARM; multi-parameter system; volcanic activity; Linux Debian; environmental surveillance

1. Introduction

Volcanoes are complex systems in which the diverse associated physico-chemical processes present a wide spatial variability [1]. In order to study these processes it is necessary to deploy monitoring networks, and the complexity of these networks will vary depending, inter alia, on the characteristics of the volcano and the perceived level of risk for the population [2]. In volcanic activity monitoring two objectives must be distinguished: research works and monitoring of the activity to forecast volcanic eruption and its communication to decision-makers. A number of different factors make the deployment of a network particularly complex; these include difficulties of physical access, extreme climate conditions, potential vandalism as well as data quality and remote data access in real time. Currently, there are multiple possibilities of data transmission in populated and developed areas. The design of a monitoring system depends heavily on the communication infrastructure available in the area (i.e., in the Vesuvius volcano the monitoring network combines different technologies: analog Ultra High Frequency (UHF), digital UHF, Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi™) and Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL)) [3]. In unpopulated areas it is necessary to fully implement the communication system. When the topography permits, a ring of access points that surround the volcano is established. The seismic sensors with low power Wi-Fi™ links [4] and a Global Positioning System (GPS) network [5] are connected to this ring. With difficult topography, a detailed survey of the access points is needed [6]. The availability of different power Wi-Fi™ links has extended this technology to transfer data over a wide range of distances [7]. A recent development is the Optimized Autonomous Space In-situ Sensorweb (OASIS) system [8] showing possibilities of new technologies. It is designed with a dense array of sensors (distances between sensors of a few hundred meters) with short-range telemetry and low power consumption. Each node could communicate each other through a low-rate wireless area network. The topology used for data has been a dynamic tree of clusters rooted to a gateway. Data are collected using a light-weight adaptive linear predictive compression algorithm [9]. It is necessary to reach a compromise between data fidelity (quality and consistency of retrieved data) and yield (quantity of data delivered by the network) [10] together with the cost and energetic requirement of the system. In some cases, it is necessary to have an Air-dropped Sensor Network in order to properly instrument the volcanic area [11].

This paper presents a Multiparametric Volcanic Monitoring System (MVMS) for research and crisis management in any active volcanic area (dispersed volcanism, stratovolcanoes and/or volcanoes with persistent activity). The system is sufficiently flexible to quickly incorporate any sensor (seismometers, Global Navigation Satellite System-Global Positioning System (GNSS-GPS), inclinometers, infrasound, gas, Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MINIDOAS), etc.) and change the settings and applications adapting it to the available sensors and environmental conditions and activity. It also handles any type of link and stores the data locally to avoid losses during breaks in the links. It is capable of processing data in order to reduce the flow of data or automatically transmit warnings. It is low cost and requires low energy consumption. The MVMS has been specifically designed while conducting research projects (1995 to present) within the framework of the Spanish Antarctic Research Program, and has been applied to the active volcano of Deception Island (62° 77′S, 60° 37′W). The focus of these research projects is the monitoring and study of the volcanic activity, centered mainly on ground deformation [1214] and seismicity [15,16]. The El Hierro Island (Canary Islands; 27.7° N; 18.0° W) unrest and eruption processes in 2011 [1719] have allowed testing the effectiveness of this system for a rapid deployment of the monitoring network. In a first phase, the IESID module for measuring ground deformation was developed [20]. In a second phase, the parameters of seismic and weather information, ground temperature at different depths, heat flux and CO2 were added.

The use of different technologies in embedded systems has increased significantly in recent years; a great deal of development effort has been expended in a wide variety of applications, especially mobile phones, tablets, and cars; as a result, system costs have been considerably reduced. The wide range of possibilities now permits the scalability of a system, which must combine high processing and storage capability with low energy requirement. One of the main targets for development is the combination of embedded systems with communication (i.e., Structural monitoring [21] and Earthquake Early Warning System [22]). In volcano monitoring [311] the main aim of the monitoring network is the detection in real-time of changes that may happen in the diverse parameters studied, i.e., seismicity, ground deformation, temperature, gases, etc. [23]. In general terms, according to theoretical models of a volcanic system [24], before an eruption, activity increases very slowly at first, but shortly before the eruption, the rate of change in activity accelerates rapidly [25,26]. In order to detect the initial stages of unrest [27], it is necessary to have long time series of measurement data, which can be analyzed for very small changes with respect to the background level. The analysis of several parameters monitored simultaneously makes it possible to discern the volcanic origin of minor disturbances. It is also important to develop specific algorithms and to have sufficient capacity for the first data processing; thus the monitoring system can be automated to generate alerts that warn the team responsible about specific changes in the state of the volcano [18,28,29]. Other warnings are generated in case of the sensors or system malfunction [30]. Here, the main characteristics of the MVMS, particularly the acquisition, storage, processing and data transference, based on an embedded Advanced RISC Machine (ARM™) Atmel AT91SAM9G25 System-on-Chip (SoC) processor are described.

2. Modular Volcano Monitoring System (MVMS)

The MVMS is composed of the Remote Modules Network (RMN) and the Data Reception Center (DRC). The RMN is formed by multiple modules for acquisition, storage and transmission of data from many diverse sensors. The DRC receives and processes the data and, in case of unrest or surveillance of an eruption, the Scientific Team (ST) analyzes in quasi real time the data and provides forecasts. Each module of the RMN (Remote Module, RM) includes an embedded ARM™ system and the communication system (see Figure 1). All these peripheral devices associated with the various different sensors are connected to this RM:

  • Ground Deformation Module (IESID) described in [20];

  • Thermometric Sensor Module (TSM);

  • Seismic Sensor Module (SSM);

  • Tide gauge;

  • Other (webcam, magnetometer, self-potential, CO2, etc.).

The embedded ARM™ system has sufficient capacity to manage a seismic array, a powerful tool for the study of volcanic seismicity with cable connection [3133] or Wi-Fi™ [34].

2.1. Hardware Components of the MVMS

The functions of RM are: sensor control, acquisition, storage and a first processing of data. In some cases data are sent periodically or under request of DRC. Furthermore, the DRC manages the warnings, which are automatically sent or triggers an alarm. For this reason, an embedded ARM™ system with enough storage and processing capacity has been selected. Depending on the needs of each location, the hardware characteristics of the embedded ARM™ system (processor speed, I/O ports, Universal Serial Bus (USB), Ethernet, video output, etc.) are chosen with the object of optimizing the power consumption/features. The same approach is adopted for the communication system: first the most appropriate type of link: Wi-Fi™, Bluetooth™, low-power Radio Frequency (RF), satellite, mobile phone, etc., is chosen, and then the connection time and the link range are optimized, using different communication protocols (Security Shell (SSH), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), etc.). For this specific application, a Fox Board G25 from Acme Systems™ has been used [35]. G25 is a cost effective System-on-Module used to reduce the development time needed to design a low-power Linux embedded device. This system does not have a Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) that reduces power consumption. Power is supplied at 12V with a voltage range (see Table 1). G25 is available in two hardware configurations. The first one includes all peripherals (USB and Ethernet ports, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), GPS, temperature sensor, display, etc.) and it is the preferred option for development and evaluation of MVMS. The second option is set using the minimum necessary hardware and it has much lower power consumption. An Operating System (OS) for specific embedded ARM™ processors is used: EmDebian™ Grip Linux 7.1 “Wheezy” embedded device Linux Kernel version 3.11 [36,37]. This allows the configuration of the kernel to reduce the power consumption (also known as “low power modes”), adjusting the frequency and voltage of the processor. There are other embedded systems that use proprietary operating systems or limited versions of Linux [3840]. In some cases, this represents a significant reduction in power; however, these systems are limited in on-board processing capabilities, storage and range wireless communications [34] so they cannot be used in our case.

All the RMs have been installed inside a robust and waterproof metal box for protection and insulation in extreme working conditions. As regards maintenance, in general, the RMs have I/O ports that can be configured as Analog/Digital Converters (ADC), sufficient for checking the state of the battery, system temperature, etc., although they lack the precision and/or speed necessary for use with other types of sensor. Several different technologies are now available for the wireless transmission of data. These can be classified into three groups: Wi-Fi™, wireless modem and 3G mobile telephony. Mobile telephony only works in densely populated areas and, in the event of a natural or man-made disaster (earthquake, volcanic eruption, flood, explosion, etc.) it may be inoperative, as with Internet communication [23]. Wi-Fi™ technology is widespread, and a variety of devices with different functions is available. Radio modems use specific technologies so they must be carefully selected. These devices have low power consumption. Tables 2 and 4 summarize the main characteristics of two Wi-Fi™ modules and a radio modem tested.

The other main element of the MVMS is the DRC which manages and receives the data from RMs. Depending on the situation and the requirements there can be five different operating modes: real-time, quasi real-time, on-demand, maintenance and research mode. Each mode has the following characteristics:

  • Real-time operating mode. Direct connection to the sensors through the RM and re-sending of data in continuous mode using the UDP. The information sent is obtained from the data register for each sensor. The transmission of this data is very fast and needs low bandwidth but packet losses occur (see Figure 2);

  • Quasi real-time operating mode. Direct connection to the sensors through the RM and re-sending of data using the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) with pre-set time intervals. The information sent is obtained from a file containing all the data for a period of either 10 min or one hour. This transmission handles a medium-size volume of data (see Figure 2);

  • On-demand operating mode. Direct connection to the sensors through the RM. Data requests are made using the TCP protocol, with longer time intervals which may or may not be programmed (on demand). The volume of the data sent corresponds to the time interval between requests, normally one day. A higher bandwidth and stable connection are needed (see Figure 3);

  • Maintenance operating mode. Includes maintenance required in the RM and in the data-logger of the sensors (e.g., deleting files, updating software, modifying settings, etc.). In general, a connection via SSH protocol is established, which permits the application to run in remote modes and/or sends files. Among the remote applications are the specific commands to access the settings of the sensors and check that everything is working correctly. Similarly each of the sensors can be restarted and it is possible to check the state of the general power supply, so that specific maintenance in the deployment area can be planned. The batteries will be changed when necessary;

  • Research operating mode. The system remains inactive for long periods of time, being activated only when the study area is visited. The data are stored in the RMs (off line) and they are downloaded manually. For scientific research only.

Depending on the data volume and/or level of volcanic activity, the reception and processing of the data can be centralized in a laptop or in a higher performance computer. In our specific case the DRC consists of a computer (INTEL™ i5) with the operating system based on Unix™ (in this case Ubuntu™ 12.04 LTS). This computer stores, processes and shares the data (e.g., Bernese 5.0™ for GPS data [41] and ObsPy [42,43], SEISAN™ [44] and Earthworm [45] for seismic data), and also manages the warnings [22]. In some case a computer network can be used in order to facilitate multiple users/accesses.

Equipment for use under extreme weather conditions must be designed with an autonomy that ensures safe operation during the pre-determined observation period. In the case of Antarctica, solar panels cannot be used in the winter, due to the absence of solar radiation. Wind turbines are not possible either, because ice accumulates on the blades. One of the solutions currently being tested is the exploitation of geothermal systems in volcanic areas to obtain power [46,47]. Each of the RM has its own power supply system, which protects the data independently of the RM. The power consumption of the ARM-module and the communication system is too high to operate for a whole year (more than 200 mAh). By reducing its working time to twenty minutes a day, (66.6 mAh), two batteries of 70 A/h in each RMN would provide enough power to work in winter. The data will be stored by the sensor data-loggers in its static First In First Out (FIFO) memory, so that these data will be ready to be sent when the ARM-module is activated. This operating method has been devised to reduce the power consumption of the MVMS to the minimum (see Table 5).

A microcontroller (Microchip PIC12F508) is used as an external hardware watchdog system to reboot the system when the ARM-module hangs. In Figure 4, the hardware-software structure for the management of the watchdog is shown. All applications periodically send a UDP message to the watchdog daemon of the G25 ARM™ system. If the watchdog daemon receives all UDP messages in a time interval, it sends a pulse through a General-Purpose Interface (GPI) port that resets the watchdog external hardware (PIC12F508). Otherwise, the microcontroller cuts the power of the entire system (including sensors).

2.2. Software Components of the MVMS

At the software level, the MVMS consists of several applications distributed in the RMs and DRC system(s). In the Data Reception Center it is necessary to distinguish two types of applications:

  • Basic Applications for receiving data, format changes and distribution to users.

  • Applications processing and analysis.

The second group of applications is specific to the type of data and the needs of users and therefore is outside the scope of this paper. The RMs applications have been developed in Unix™ script, American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C [48], Python [4951] and Java [52,53]. The Table 6 shows the main configure tasks for the ARM-module.

In general, the sensors used are commercial modules, which need the specific communication protocols. Seismic and GNSS-GPS systems have easy-to-integrate communication interfaces that use standard or well documented formats (Tables 7, 8 and 9).

In the case of thermometry, an application has been developed permitting the communication with the XR5 acquisition system of Pace Scientific™ [54] through its text command interface. The seismic instrumentation system has been designed within the CSIC-UCA research team using an inexpensive geophone SM6 4.5 Hz [55] with extended response to 0.5 Hz and a sigma-delta Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) (16/24 bits).

This instrumentation uses a very simple format (see Table 10) based on Earthworm to make data transfer easier and, in particular, to reduce the load in the microcontroller and to adjust its clock frequency in order to reduce the energy requirement.

The DRC must necessarily include the same software packages used for communication with RMs and libraries for decoding the data and messages received. The quantity and quality of the data depend on many factors starting from the sensor itself (i.e., using a seismic sensor of 4.5 Hz or a Broadband, GPS L1 or L1L2), the number of samples to be stored and the number of bytes of each sample. This choice must combine data fidelity to the cost of the system and the energetic requirement, considering, at the same time, the loss of the device caused by volcanic activity or vandalism. Finally, both DRC and RMN incorporate a set of watchdog (software) that controls the proper operation of each of the components of the system, issuing warnings to ST in charge.

3. MVMS Applications: Deception Island (Antarctica) and El Hierro Island (Canary Islands)

This work has been carried out within the framework of volcanological research projects. Between other active volcanic areas, the MVMS has been developed and applied to study the geodynamic and volcanic activity of Deception Island (1995 to present, in the frame of Spanish Antarctic Research Program). More recently, this methodology has made possible a rapid instrumentation of El Hierro Island in 2011, during the unrest and eruption process. The MVMS deployed at Deception Island has been developed in successive phases [1216] continually improving the hardware and software used. Figure 5 shows the configuration of the network in the 2012–2013 survey. Extended star topology is used. Distances from DRC to RMNs approximately of 10 km. The MVMS allows monitoring of both seismic activity and deformation in near real time.

The fast evaluation of volcanic activity on the island is a crucial factor for the safety of Antarctic researchers and, especially, the many tourists that visit the island every austral summer (3,286 in 2012–2013) [56]. Figure 6 shows the deployment of the GNSS-GPS station located in Cerro Caliente (CECA).

At Deception Island the MVMS is powered by a 12 V 74 Ah battery for higher consumption components (ARM™, WI-FI™, and GPS-GNSS). For TSM and SSM sensors a 12 V and 7.2 Ah battery is used. A set of solar panels ensure the charge of the battery. The position data (GNSS-GPS data) are sampled at 1 Hz, the seismic data at 50 Hz and the temperature every 5 minutes. The sending of the GNSS-GPS data is carried out every hour even if the system supports the sending of position data every second. Seismic data are transmitted every second and temperature is transmitted every 5 min. Figure 7 shows an example of real time monitoring of ground deformation and temperature.

In June–July 2011 period, an unrest process was detected on El Hierro Island [57] that demanded a quick instrument deployment that would allow near real-time monitoring of the activity. The instrumentation deployed was restricted to seismic sensors and GNSS-GPS (see Figure 8) with Internet access.

The seismic data transmission uses a UDP protocol every 5 s. Lost packets are recovered with SSH protocol. The GNSS-GPS data are accessed via FTP. Each RM is powered by a battery of 12 V and 12 Ah with a charger powered by the electric network ensuring the system operation during supply interruptions. The communications system and the ARM™ module operate in continuous mode to allow near real-time monitoring. In the moments of greatest activity Internet and mobile telephony were not available so the access to the stations was only possible with direct connection (wire or Wi-Fi™). Data from other stations required manual access (volunteers, citizen cooperation). Figure 9 shows a 24 h seismic record. This network allowed the scientific monitoring of the volcanic activity and the evolution forecast establishment [1719].

4. Conclusions

This paper describes the development of an autonomous Monitoring Volcanic Multi-parameter System (MVMS) with remote access possibility and connection of several modules in a network. The MVMS is very easy to deploy for both research and/or monitoring network that uses the latest technologies of embedded systems, and to incorporate any type of sensor and/or communication system. Another advantage of MVMS is the possibility of a rapid development of the software necessary for managing the sensors and instruments available. The price of both hardware and software is very low. The MVMS consists of a network (or a network of networks) of Remote Modules (RMN) that receive the data via cable or through wireless links from sensors, store them locally on a large capacity support (Compact Flash (CF), Secure Digital (SD™), USB memory, etc.), make a first processing and send warnings. Data can be transmitted in near real time or on demand to a Data Reception Center (DRC). The local storage allows retrieving data when the transmission fails and uses only short transmission periods rather than continuous transmission. An embedded ARM™ system (highly reliable low-cost solution) with enough storage and processing capacity has been chosen. An Operating System (OS) for specific embedded ARM™ processors has been used: EmDebian™ Grip Linux 7.1 “Wheezy” embedded device Linux Kernel version 3.11 [36,37]. This OS offers great flexibility to develop applications related to different sensors (seismic, thermometry, GPS, etc.) including data processing and generation of warnings related to the change of activity in the volcanic system. It also allows the implementation of different communication protocols (satellite, telephony, Wi-Fi™, serial, etc.). ARM-modules can work as specific sensors networks (e.g., infrasounds, seismic array, etc.). Some ARM-modules can configure a network that sends data to a great capacity central module for data processing and transmission.

Because the MVMS is highly flexible, its deployment can be customized depending on the parameters that need to be measured for the particular phenomenon being studied for researching and/or crisis management. From the experience already gained, it can be stated that the deployment of embedded equipment based on ARM™ processors has proved to offer high reliability and moderate power consumption. The introduction of the new ARM™ processors and specific improvements in the Linux kernel for these microprocessors offer the prospect of greater energy efficiency. At the same time, battery technology is undergoing significant and rapid advances; these are developments that will make possible the unattended monitoring of modules of this type for more than a whole year, with a moderate cost, weight and volume in batteries.

The advantage of MVMS presented in this paper is that it allows the rapid development of a monitoring network that uses the latest technologies of embedded systems. These systems offer the possibility of developing the software necessary for managing the sensors and instruments available. The price of both hardware and software is very low.

The MVMS has been carried out within the framework of geodynamics and volcanic activity of Deception Island (Antarctica) and other research projects on active volcanic areas. Its most recent application has taken place during the 2011 unrest and eruption processes of El Hierro Island (Canary Islands) with very good results [1719]. It is currently deployed on Tenerife Island to monitor the activity of the Teide volcano.


This geodetic research has been carried out with the support of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science as part of the National Antarctic Program. The following research projects directly contributed to this work: Geodetic and Geothermal Researches, Time Serial Analysis and Volcanic Innovation in Antarctica (South Shetland Islands and Antarctic Peninsula (GEOTINANT) (CTM2009-07251/ANT); Surveillance of the volcanic activity on Deception Island (Antarctica): ground deformation and thermal anomalies parameters (CTM2011-14936-E); and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, CGL2011-28682- C02-01) and CSIC (2011-30E070) Active Volcanism research projects developed in Tenerife and El Hierro Island (Canary Islands).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Seidl, D.; Hellweg, M.; Calvache, M.; Gomez, D.; Ortega, A.; Torres, R.; Böker, F.; Buttkus, B.; Faber, E.; Greinwald, S. The multiparameter station at Galeras Volcano (Colombia): Concept and realization. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2003, 125, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewert, J.; Guffanti, M.; Murray, T. An Assessment of Volcanic Threat and Monitoring Capabilities in the United States: Framework for a National Volcano Early Warning System NVEWS; Open-File Report 2005-1164; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Orazi, M.; Peluso, R.; Caputo, A.; Capello, M.; Buonocunto, C.; Martini, M. A Multiparametric Low Power Digitizer: Project and Results. In Conception, Verification, and Application of Innovative Techniques to Study Active Volcanoes; Marzocchi, W., Zollo, A., Eds.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Naples, Italy, 2008; pp. 435–460. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peluso, R.; Buonocunto, C.; Caputo, A.; De Cesare, W.; Orazi, M.; Scarpato, G. Tecniche di Alta Disponibilità per l'acquisizione di dati sismici in ambiente GNU/Linux: Un'applicazione alla rete sismica di Stromboli. Quaderni di Geofisica 2009, 74, 4–17. [Google Scholar]
  5. Puglisi, G.; Bonaccorso, A.; Mattia, M.; Aloisi, M.; Bonforte, A.; Campisi, O.; Cantarero, M.; Falzone, G.; Puglisi, B.; Rossi, M. New integrated geodetic monitoring system at Stromboli volcano (Italy). Eng. Geol. 2005, 79, 13–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mattia, M.; Pellegrino, D.; Pulvirenti, M.; Rossi, M. Applicazioni di sistemi di comunicazione wireless a 5 GHz per il monitoraggio multiparametrico dell'Etna; Technical Report 207; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Sezione di Catania, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. Scarpato, G.; de Cesare, W.; Orazi, M.; Peluso, R.; Caputo, A.; Martini, M.; Giudicepietro, F. Sistemi di trasmissione WiFi per il monitoraggio sismico del Vesuvio; Technical Report; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Osservatorio Vesuviano, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Song, W.; Hu, X.; Pan, Y. Optimized Autonomous Space In-Situ Sensorweb, 2010; Sensorweb Research Laboratory, Georgia State University: Atlanta, GA, USA. Available online: (accessed on 7 November 2013).
  9. Huang, R.; Song, W.Z.; Xu, M.; Peterson, N.; Shirazi, B.; LaHusen, R. Real-world sensor network for long-term volcano monitoring: Design and findings. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2012, 23, 321–329. [Google Scholar]
  10. Werner-Allen, G.; Lorincz, K.; Johnson, J.; Lees, J.; Welsh, M. Fidelity and Yield in a Volcano Monitoring Sensor Network. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Seattle, WA, USA, 6–8 November 2006; pp. 381–396.
  11. Song, W.; Huang, R.; Xu, M.; Ma, A.; Shirazi, B.; LaHusen, R. ACM. Air-Dropped Sensor Network for Real-Time High-Fidelity Volcano Monitoring. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, Wroclaw, Poland, 22–25 June 2009; pp. 305–318.
  12. Berrocoso, M.; Prates, G.; Fernández-Ros, A.; García, A. Normal vector analysis from GNSS-GPS data applied to Deception Volcano surface deformation. Geophys. J. Int. 2012, 190, 1562–1570. [Google Scholar]
  13. Torrecillas, C.; Berrocoso, M.; Felpeto, A.; Torrecillas, M.; García, A. Reconstructing palaeovolcanic geometries using a Geodynamic Regression Model (GRM): Application to Deception Island volcano (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Geomorphology 2012, 182, 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Prates, G.; Berrocoso, M.; Fernández-Ros, A.; García, A. Enhancement of sub-daily positioning solutions for surface deformation monitoring at Deception volcano (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Bull. Volcanol. 2013, 75, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vila, J.; Martí, J.; Ortiz, R.; García, A.; Correig, A.M. Volcanic tremors at Deception Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1992, 53, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ibáñez, J.M.; Del Pezzo, E.; Almendros, J.; La Rocca, M.; Alguacil, G.; Ortiz, R.; García, A. Seismovolcanic signals at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica: Wave field analysis and source modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105, 13905–13931. [Google Scholar]
  17. Prates, G.; García, A.; Fernández-Ros, A.; Marrero, J.M.; Ortiz, R.; Berrocoso, M. Enhancement of sub-daily positioning solutions for surface deformation surveillance at El Hierro volcano (Canary Islands). Bull. Volcanol. 2013, 75, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcia, A.; Berrocoso, M.; Marrero, J.M.; Fernandez-Ros, A.; Prates, G.; De la Cruz-Reyna, S.; Ortiz, R. Volcanic Alert System (VAS) developed during the (2011–2013) El Hierro (Canary Islands) volcanic process. Bull. Volcanol. 2013. in press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcia, A.; Fernandez-Ros, A.; Marrero, J.M.; Berrocoso, M.; Prates, G.; De la Cruz-Reyna, S.; Ortiz, R. Magma displacements under insular volcanic fields, applications to eruption forecasting: El Hierro, Canary Islands. Geophys. J. Int. 2011–2013. in press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Peci, L.M.; Berrocoso, M.; Páez, R.; Fernández-Ros, A.; de Gil, A. IESID: Automatic system for monitoring ground deformation on the Deception Island volcano (Antarctica). Comput. Geosci. 2012, 48, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu, N.; Rangwala, S.; Chintalapudi, K.K.; Ganesan, D.; Broad, A.; Govindan, R.; Estrin, D. A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Monitoring. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '04), Baltimore, MD, USA, 3–5 November 2004; pp. 13–24.
  22. Peng, C.; Zhu, X.; Yang, J.; Xue, B.; Chen, Y. Development of an integrated onsite earthquake early warning system and test deployment in Zhaotong, China. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 56, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bignami, C., Bosi, V., Costantini, L., Cristiani, C., Lavigne, F., Thierry, P., Eds.; Handbook for Volcanic Risk Management—Prevention, Crisis Management, Resilience [Online]; MIAVITA Project— European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development: Orleans, France, 2012; (accessed on 1 June 2013). Available online:
  24. Voight, B. A method for prediction of volcanic eruptions. Nature 1998, 332, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  25. De la Cruz-Reyna, S.; Reyes-Dávila, G.A. A model to describe precursory material-failure phenomena: Applications to short-term forecasting at Colima volcano, Mexico. Bull. Volcanol. 2001, 63, 297–308. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ortiz, R.; Moreno, H.; García, A.; Fuentealba, G.; Astiz, M.; Peña, P.; Sánchez, N.; Tárraga, M. Villarrica volcano (Chile): Characteristics of the volcanic tremor and forecasting of small explosions by means of a material failure method. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2003, 128, 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tárraga, M.; Carniel, R.; Ortiz, R.; García, A. The failure forecast method: Review and application for the real-time detection of precursory patterns at reawakening volcanoes. Dev. Volcanol. 2008, 10, 447–469. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fearnley, C. Standardising the USGS Volcano Alert Level System: Acting in the Context of Risk, Uncertainty and Complexity. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCL (University College London), London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fearnley, C.; McGuire, W.; Davies, G.; Twigg, J. Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): Analysis and ramifications. Bull. Volcanol. 2012, 74, 2023–2036. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng, Y.; Lahusen, R.; Shirazi, B.; Song, W. IET. Design of Smart Sensing Component for Volcano Monitoring. Proceedings of 2008 IET 4th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, St. Johns York University, York, UK, 21–22 July 2008; pp. 1–7.
  31. Ortiz, R.; García, A.; Olmedillas, J.C.; Vila, J. Portable digital seismic array for volcano monitoring. Les Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodinamique et Seismologie 1991, 4, 269–276. [Google Scholar]
  32. Almendros, J.; Ibañez, J.; Alguacil, G.; Del Pezzo, E.; Ortiz, R. Array tracking of volcano tremor source at Deception Island, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1997, 24, 3069–3972. [Google Scholar]
  33. Del Pezzo, E.; La Rocca, M.; Petrosino, S.; Grozea, B.; Maritato, L.; Saccorotti, G.; Simini, M.; Ibañez, J.; Alguacil, G.; Carmona, E.; et al. Twin Digital Short Period Seismic Array Experiment at Stromboli Volcano; Technical Report; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia: Osservatorio Vesuviano, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nittel, S. A survey of geosensor networks: advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors 2009, 9, 5664–5678. [Google Scholar]
  35. Acme Systems SRL. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  36. Debian Operating System. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  37. Embedded Debian Project. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  38. TinyOS Open Source Operating System. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  39. Lantronix, Inc. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  40. Contiki Open Source Operating System. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  41. Dach, R.; Hugentobler, U.; Fridez, P.; Meindl, M. Bernese GNSS Software, Version 5.0; Astronomical Institute, University of Bern: Bern, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Beyreuther, M.; Barsch, R.; Krischer, L.; Megies, T.; Behr, Y.; Wassermann, J. ObsPy: A python toolbox for seismology. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2010, 81, 530–533. [Google Scholar]
  43. Megies, T.; Beyreuther, M.; Barsch, R.; Krischer, L.; Wassermann, J. ObsPy—What can it do for data centers and observatories? Ann. Geophys. 2011, 54, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ottemöller, L.; Voss, P.; Havskov, J. Seisan Earthquake Analysis Software for Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macosx [Online]; Department of Earth Science University: Bergen: Bergen, Norway, 2013. Available online: (accessed on 1 June 2013).
  45. Johnson, C.E.; Bittenbinder, A.; Bogaert, B.; Dietz, L.; Kohler, W. Earthworm: A flexible approach to seismic network processing. Iris Newsl. 1995, 14, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bhushan, B. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 3rd ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sveinsson, J.; Gudmundsson, M.T.; Palsson, F. A Geothermally Driven Peltier Generator for Powering Instruments and Transmission Link from Vantajokull Glacier (Veggspjald). Proceedings of the Conference on Industrial Uses of Geothermal Energy, Reykjavík, Iceland, 2–4 September 1992.
  48. Kernighan, B.W.; Ritchie, D.M. The ANSI C Programming Language, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jones, E.; Oliphant, T.; Peterson, P. SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python, 2001. Available online: (accessed on 1 June 2013).
  50. McKinney, W. Python for Data Analysis; O'Reilly Media, Incorporated: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  52. Flanagan, D. Java Examples in a Nutshell; O'Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gosling, J.; Joy, B.; Steele, G.; Bracha, G.; Buckley, A. The Java Language Specification, Java SE, 7th ed.; Addison-Wesley Professional: Redwood City, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pace Scientific Data Loggers and Sensors. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  55. SM-6 Geophone. Available online: (accessed on 2 December 2013).
  56. International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. Available online: (accessed on 25 November 2013).
  57. López, C.; Blanco, M.J.; Abella, R.; Brenes, B.; Cabrera, V.M.; Casas, B.; Domínguez, I.; Felpeto, A.; Fernández, M.; del Fresno, C.; et al. Monitoring the volcanic unrest of El Hierro (Canary Islands) before the onset of the 2011–2012 submarine eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Advanced RISC Machine microprocessor architecture


Data Reception Center


Global Navigation Satellite System


Inclinometro ESpacial Isla Decepcion (Deception Island Spatial Inclinometer)


Modular Volcano Monitoring System


Remote Module


Remote Modules Network


Scientific Team


Security Shell


Seismic Sensor Module


Thermometric Sensor Module


Consejo Superior Investigaciones Cientificas—Universidad de Cadiz (Spanish Research Council – Cadiz University)

Figure 1. Components of the MVMS (block diagram of the modules).
Figure 1. Components of the MVMS (block diagram of the modules).
Sensors 14 00672f1 1024
Figure 2. Real-time and quasi real-time operating modes.
Figure 2. Real-time and quasi real-time operating modes.
Sensors 14 00672f2 1024
Figure 3. On demand operating mode.
Figure 3. On demand operating mode.
Sensors 14 00672f3 1024
Figure 4. Watchdogs management.
Figure 4. Watchdogs management.
Sensors 14 00672f4 1024
Figure 5. MVMS deployed on Deception Island. Distribution of RMs and DRC location. The GNSS-GPS stations form the IESID module; seismic stations form the SSM module and the thermometric sensors the TSM module.
Figure 5. MVMS deployed on Deception Island. Distribution of RMs and DRC location. The GNSS-GPS stations form the IESID module; seismic stations form the SSM module and the thermometric sensors the TSM module.
Sensors 14 00672f5 1024
Figure 6. Detail of the transmission and power systems located in CECA and ARM™ module deployed.
Figure 6. Detail of the transmission and power systems located in CECA and ARM™ module deployed.
Sensors 14 00672f6 1024
Figure 7. Records of the ground deformation parameter obtained by the MVMS system in the PEND station and thermometric anomalies in the CECA station.
Figure 7. Records of the ground deformation parameter obtained by the MVMS system in the PEND station and thermometric anomalies in the CECA station.
Sensors 14 00672f7 1024
Figure 8. Distribution of the Remote Modules (CSIC-UCA network) on El Hierro Island. FRON is a GNSS-GPS public receiver (GRAFCAN, Canary Island Government). The complex topography of the island does not allow an easy implementation of a local network. Access to the data is carried out through Internet from the populated area nearest to RM.
Figure 8. Distribution of the Remote Modules (CSIC-UCA network) on El Hierro Island. FRON is a GNSS-GPS public receiver (GRAFCAN, Canary Island Government). The complex topography of the island does not allow an easy implementation of a local network. Access to the data is carried out through Internet from the populated area nearest to RM.
Sensors 14 00672f8 1024
Figure 9. Seismic record of 2013/03/29, during the main magma injection process [18,19]. (VSAB station; CSIC-UCA network; El Hierro Island (See Figure 8)).
Figure 9. Seismic record of 2013/03/29, during the main magma injection process [18,19]. (VSAB station; CSIC-UCA network; El Hierro Island (See Figure 8)).
Sensors 14 00672f9 1024
Table 1. Characteristics of the Acmesystems™ G25 module.
Table 1. Characteristics of the Acmesystems™ G25 module.
MicroprocessorATMEL™ ARM9 AT91SAM9G25 400 MHz
RAM memory256 MB
MicroSD memory16 GB
USB ports×2 type 2.0; 12 MB
Ethernet ports×1 10/100
Power requirement (no port activity)80 mA
Table 2. Characteristics of the Ubiquiti™ NanoStation2 router.
Table 2. Characteristics of the Ubiquiti™ NanoStation2 router.
Range15 km (with built-in antenna)
AntennaBuilt-in 10 dBi + RP-SMA connector for external antenna
Max. power consumption6 W
Power supply12 V 1 A
Ethernet port×1 10/100
Operating temperature−40 to 85 °C
Operating humidity5% to 95%
Interfaces10/100 Base-TX (Cat. 5, RJ-45)
Operating frequencies2,415 to 2,462 MHz
SensitivityRX −97 dBm ± 2 dBm
PowerTX 26 dBm, ± 2 dBm
Table 3. Characteristics of the TPLink™ TL-WA5210G router.
Table 3. Characteristics of the TPLink™ TL-WA5210G router.
Range50 km (with built-in antenna)
Antenna12 dBi
Max. power consumption12 W (adjustable according to range)
Power supply12 V 1 A
Ethernet port1× RJ-45 10/100
Operating temperature−30 to 70 °C
Operating humidity10% to 90% no condensing
Interfaces10/100 Base-TX (Cat. 5, RJ-45)
Operating frequencies2.4 to 2.4835 GHz
SensitivityRX −98 dBm
PowerTX 27 dBm
Table 4. Characteristics of the YLX-TRM8053-500-05 and YLX-TRM8053-025-05 radio modems.
Table 4. Characteristics of the YLX-TRM8053-500-05 and YLX-TRM8053-025-05 radio modems.
Range40 km2 km
Max. power consumption500 mW25 mW
Power supply2.4 to 3.6 V2.4 to 3.6 V
Ethernet portNaNa
Operating temperatureNaNa
Operating humidityNaNa
InterfacesThrough the pins of the chipThrough the pins of the chip
Operating frequencies868 − 870/MHz868 − 870/MHz
Sensitivity−114 dBm−114 dBm
Power27 dBm14 dBm
Table 5. Power requirement.
Table 5. Power requirement.
RMN SubsystemCurrent Requirement at 12 V
GNSS -GPS System* 430 mA
SSM Seismic System6 mA
TSM Temperature System30 μA
ARM Module Fox Board G25*50–100 mA (depending on port activity)
WiFi Routers TPLink TL-WA5210G* 1.0 A
Radio Modem YLX-TRM8053-500-05* 0.5 A

Note:*These modules can be activated for short periods of time in order to reduce the power consumption.

Table 6. ARM-module configuration.
Table 6. ARM-module configuration.
Linux Debian™ 7.1 “Wheezy”Prebuilt Debian™ Packages Needed to Support Their Application
Set system localeen_US
SensorsSet sensor folders tree, Specific sensor applications, I/O interfaces
Communication applicationsIP address, Mode, Protocols, Security etc.
Set, ssh-keygen
Set deamonsWatchdog
Set crontabSchedule commands to be executed periodically
Table 7. Earthworm format for seismic waveform.
Table 7. Earthworm format for seismic waveform.
Pin Number4Integer
Number of samples in packet4Integer
Time of first sample in epoch seconds8Double
Time of last sample in epoch seconds8Double
Sample rate; nominal8Double
Site name7Char
Network name9Char
Component/channel code9Char
Data format code3Char
Data-quality field2Char
Table 8. GPS format (Outside World Interface (OWI) Leyca Geosystems™). Sent by GPS GX1230 of Leica.
Table 8. GPS format (Outside World Interface (OWI) Leyca Geosystems™). Sent by GPS GX1230 of Leica.
FieldSize (bytes)
Header6/array of char
Id of message3/array of char
ParametersVariable number of parameters dependent of Id message
Table 9. Thermometric format sent by datalogger XR5.
Table 9. Thermometric format sent by datalogger XR5.
FieldSize (bytes)
Date and time19/array of char
Table 10. Format of the CSIC-UCA system.
Table 10. Format of the CSIC-UCA system.
FieldSize (bytes)
GPS date and time4
Delta of time1
Number of order2
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top