Sensors 2013, 13(7), 9183-9200; doi:10.3390/s130709183
Article

Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities

1 School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland BT37 0QB, UK 2 Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 971 87, Sweden 3 Computing and Information Engineering, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, UK
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 April 2013; in revised form: 28 June 2013 / Accepted: 9 July 2013 / Published: 17 July 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Sensors Technology in the UK 2013)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [492 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 18 July 2013 09:58 CEST]
The original version is still available [491 KB, uploaded 17 July 2013 15:24 CEST]
Abstract: This article describes an investigation to determine the optimal placement of accelerometers for the purpose of detecting a range of everyday activities. The paper investigates the effect of combining data from accelerometers placed at various bodily locations on the accuracy of activity detection. Eight healthy males participated within the study. Data were collected from six wireless tri-axial accelerometers placed at the chest, wrist, lower back, hip, thigh and foot. Activities included walking, running on a motorized treadmill, sitting, lying, standing and walking up and down stairs. The Support Vector Machine provided the most accurate detection of activities of all the machine learning algorithms investigated. Although data from all locations provided similar levels of accuracy, the hip was the best single location to record data for activity detection using a Support Vector Machine, providing small but significantly better accuracy than the other investigated locations. Increasing the number of sensing locations from one to two or more statistically increased the accuracy of classification. There was no significant difference in accuracy when using two or more sensors. It was noted, however, that the difference in activity detection using single or multiple accelerometers may be more pronounced when trying to detect finer grain activities. Future work shall therefore investigate the effects of accelerometer placement on a larger range of these activities.
Keywords: activity recognition; accelerometery; wearable technology; classification models

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cleland, I.; Kikhia, B.; Nugent, C.; Boytsov, A.; Hallberg, J.; Synnes, K.; McClean, S.; Finlay, D. Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities. Sensors 2013, 13, 9183-9200.

AMA Style

Cleland I, Kikhia B, Nugent C, Boytsov A, Hallberg J, Synnes K, McClean S, Finlay D. Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities. Sensors. 2013; 13(7):9183-9200.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cleland, Ian; Kikhia, Basel; Nugent, Chris; Boytsov, Andrey; Hallberg, Josef; Synnes, Kåre; McClean, Sally; Finlay, Dewar. 2013. "Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities." Sensors 13, no. 7: 9183-9200.

Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert