Next Article in Journal
Over-Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-D Promotes Tumor Growth and Invasion in Endometrial Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Albumin Suppresses Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Proliferation and the Cell Cycle
Previous Article in Journal
Nitric Oxide Functions as a Signal in Ultraviolet-B-Induced Baicalin Accumulation in Scutellaria baicalensis Suspension Cultures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long Non-Coding RNA HOTAIR Promotes Cell Migration and Invasion via Down-Regulation of RNA Binding Motif Protein 38 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(3), 4747-4779; doi:10.3390/ijms15034747

Review
The Role of Chemokines in Hepatitis C Virus-Mediated Liver Disease
Anette Brass and Erwin Daniel Brenndörfer *
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 14186, Sweden; E-Mail: anette.brass@gmx.de
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: erwin.brenndorfer@ki.se; Tel.: +46-8-5858-7929; Fax: +46-8-5858-7933.
Received: 14 February 2014; in revised form: 7 March 2014 / Accepted: 12 March 2014 /
Published: 18 March 2014

Abstract

: The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global health problem affecting more than 170 million people. A chronic HCV infection is associated with liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. To enable viral persistence, HCV has developed mechanisms to modulate both innate and adaptive immunity. The recruitment of antiviral immune cells in the liver is mainly dependent on the release of specific chemokines. Thus, the modulation of their expression could represent an efficient viral escape mechanism to hamper specific immune cell migration to the liver during the acute phase of the infection. HCV-mediated changes in hepatic immune cell chemotaxis during the chronic phase of the infection are significantly affecting antiviral immunity and tissue damage and thus influence survival of both the host and the virus. This review summarizes our current understanding of the HCV-mediated modulation of chemokine expression and of its impact on the development of liver disease. A profound knowledge of the strategies used by HCV to interfere with the host’s immune response and the pro-fibrotic and pro-carcinogenic activities of HCV is essential to be able to design effective immunotherapies against HCV and HCV-mediated liver diseases.
Keywords:
HCV; intrahepatic immunity; immune escape; liver fibrosis; liver cancer; hepatitis C treatment

1. Introduction

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is very successful at establishing a chronic infection that leads over decades to the development of severe liver diseases including fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. This review starts by describing shortly how HCV evades/modulates the innate immune response and by giving an overview of the current treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Then, some general information about chemokines is presented followed by the description of the role of chemokines in intrahepatic immunity. In the following chapters, we describe in detail our current understanding of how HCV modulates the chemokine response both with regard to altered recruitment of immune cells and impact on the development of HCV-mediated liver diseases such as fibrosis and HCC. Finally, we discuss the potential of therapies based on the amplification or interference of chemokine signaling for liver-related diseases.

1.1. Hepatitis C Virus

Infection with HCV is a global health problem affecting about 170 million people worldwide [1]. About 70%–80% of those infected with HCV develop a chronic infection [2,3], which is a major cause for severe liver disease including fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [4].

HCV belongs to the genus Hepacivirus and is a member of the Flaviviridae family. The virus has a positive single strand RNA genome of 9.6 kb that encodes for a polyprotein, which is cleaved into three structural proteins (core, E1, E2) and seven non-structural (NS) proteins (p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, NS5B) by host and viral proteases [5,6]. Due to the lack of a proofreading function of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase NS5B, HCV has a high genetic variability. Based upon sequence similarities within sequences from core, E1 and NS5 regions, HCV is classified into 7 major genotypes (gt, 60%–70% sequence similarity) and numerous subtypes (75%–85% sequence similarity) [7].

During an acute infection with HCV only about 25% of the infected will clear the infection, while the majority will turn chronic [8]. One reason, why HCV is so successful in establishing a persistent infection, is evasion of and interference with the innate immune response that represents the first line of defence against, amongst others, viral infections [9].

HCV infects hepatocytes and is identified as non-self by intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that activate the innate immune response. These PRRs bind to pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are accessible during the HCV replication cycle. The retinoic acid inducible gene-I (RIG-I) pathway is activated within hours after HCV infection, by binding of RIG-I to a RNA structure from the 3′ untranslated region of HCV and its replication intermediate [10,11]. The activated signaling cascade is composed of several steps including the involvement of the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS). In the end, the cascade leads to the activation of downstream effector molecules like the transcription factors nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and interferon regulatory factor (IRF)3 and switches the cell into an antiviral state [10].

Another PRR implicated in HCV recognition is Toll-like receptor (TLR)3, which is expressed in a number of liver-resident cell types, including hepatocytes and Kupffer cells (KCs) [12,13]. In contrast to RIG-I signaling, TLR3 signaling is induced a few days after HCV infection by the recognition of HCV dsRNA replication intermediates. The signal is transmitted by the TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing-interferon-β (TRIF) and activates IRF3 and NFκB [14,15].

Protein kinase R (PKR) is activated by binding to dsRNA at the internal ribosome entry site of HCV RNA. This leads to phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) and the suppression of the translation of host mRNAs, while HCV translation continues from the HCV internal ribosome entry site. A kinase-independent signaling cascade via MAVS that drives the induction of interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes and IFN-β is also activated. The mechanisms of the crosstalk between PKR and RIG-I signaling are under investigation [16,17].

HCV interferes with the signaling pathways of the innate immune system at several steps. The viral protease NS3/4A is a central part of the evasion strategy as it cleaves not only the viral polyprotein but also MAVS, thereby preventing activation of the RIG-I pathway [18,19] and TRIF, the adaptor protein transmitting signals from TLR3 [20].

PKR seems to fulfill pro- and antiviral roles. While suppression of the translation of host mRNAs can inhibit the translation of type I IFN and IFN-inducible genes, it can also inhibit the translation of host factors necessary for HCV replication. Two HCV proteins, NS5A and E2, have been shown to inhibit the PKR kinase activity and thereby regulate the inhibition of the host mRNA translation [2123]. The kinase-independent signaling pathway is like the RIG-I signaling pathway sensitive to the NS3/4A-mediated cleavage of MAVS.

The treatment of chronic HCV infection is based on pegylated IFN-α (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) with different success rates. Achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR) is dependent on viral as well as host factors such as the viral genotype and the host IL-28B genotype [24]. For HCV gt 1 the first direct acting antivirals (DAAs), the NS3/4A protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir, have been approved for treatment in combination with pegIFN and RBV in 2011. Triple combination therapy increased the SVR rate from around 40% up to 75% in treatment naive patients, but also the occurrence of adverse effects [25,26]. Recently, simeprevir, a second-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitor, has been approved for combination treatment of chronic HCV gt 1 infection. Together with pegIFN/RBV, simeprevir achieves SVR rates up to 90% in treatment naive patients, while the occurrence of adverse effects was not increased compared to pegIFN/RBV treatment alone [27]. End of 2013, sofosbuvir, the first nucleotide NS5B inhibitor, has been approved for treatment of chronic HCV infection. Sofosbuvir is also the first DAA approved for interferon-free treatment of patients chronically infected with HCV gt 2 and 3, which will significantly reduce adverse effects of HCV treatment [28]. Additional novel DAAs are currently in clinical trials and are expected to change the treatment of chronic HCV infection within the next years [29,30].

With time, 50% of those chronically infected with HCV will develop a chronic liver disease associated with e.g., fibrosis, and 5%–20% will progress to cirrhosis within 5–20 years. Every year, 1%–2% of these cirrhotic patients will develop HCC [4]. Whereas chronic hepatitis C can be treated, there is currently no treatment available for fibrosis other than organ transplantation. However, several antifibrotic compounds are under investigation that target the main signaling pathways involved in liver fibrosis such as the platelet derived growth factor and the transforming growth (TGF)-β signaling pathway [31]. One of these compounds is sorafenib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the platelet derived growth factor receptor and the Raf/Extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway. It has been approved for the treatment of HCC in 2007 and has also been shown to have antifibrotic effects [3234]. For the treatment of HCC, there are currently no other drugs available; treatment alternatives are surgical removal of the tumor or organ transplantation.

Clearance of HCV infection during the acute phase has been associated with a strong and broad T cell response [35]. In chronic HCV infection, innate and adaptive immunity are impaired on many levels [36,37]. The HCV-mediated modulation of the chemokine response in the liver has implications for both viral persistence and the development of liver disease. In this review, we describe how HCV modulates the intrahepatic chemokine response, the relevance of these changes for liver disease progression and possibilities for targeting these changes for novel therapies.

1.2. Chemokines

Chemokines are a large family of small molecules (8–12 kD), the chemotactic cytokines. They are defined by a characteristic three-dimensional structure that is based on two disulphide bridges formed by four conserved cysteine residues. According to the relative position of the two N-terminal cysteine residues, chemokines are divided into four subfamilies: CXC, CC, CX3C and C. CXC and CC chemokines are the two major subfamilies, with the two N-terminal cysteines being separated by one amino acid or none, respectively. CX3CL1, also known as fractalkine or neurotactin, is the single member of the CX3C subfamily with 3 amino acids separating the first two cysteine residues. The C subfamily of chemokines is atypical in that it has only one N-terminal cysteine residue [38,39].

Previously chemokines have been divided according to their functionality into inflammatory and homeostatic chemokines. Inflammatory chemokines control the recruitment of leukocytes during infection, inflammation and tissue injury. They are strongly upregulated under inflammatory conditions and many have broad target-cell selectivity. Homeostatic chemokines are constitutively expressed and regulate homeostatic migration and homing of various cells. However several chemokines have been identified that fulfill both tasks; these have been termed “dual-function” chemokines. In contrast to the inflammatory chemokines, homeostatic and “dual-function” chemokines are highly selective [40].

While chemokines were discovered due to their chemotactic effect on leukocytes, they are now known to fulfill more roles than regulating (immune) cell migration and homeostasis. Chemokines are amongst others involved in the embryonic development of the central nervous system [41,42] and play a role in T cell development and activation [43,44]. Furthermore, they have angiogenic/angiostatic effects, which are of importance in cancer metastasis and present an option for the development of cancer therapies [45,46].

Another way chemokines differ from other cytokines is that their receptors belong to the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors. As the chemokines, the receptors are grouped into four subfamilies, depending on the subfamily of their major chemokine ligand [47]. Upon activation, the chemokine receptor is phosphorylated and the heterotrimeric G protein dissociates from the receptor into its Gα- and Gβγ-subunit. The following signaling cascades induce conformational changes within the leukocyte integrins that enable the interaction of the cell with adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. After being secreted, chemokines can be immobilized by binding to glycosaminoglycans on the surface of endothelial cells and the extracellular matrix, thereby creating a gradient that coordinates trafficking of leukocytes to the target area [48].

Which leukocytes are recruited, depends on the chemokines secreted as well as on the chemokine receptors expressed on the surface of the target cell. Inflammatory chemokines often bind to more than one receptor and vice versa, but not necessarily have the same biological function. CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 e.g., are ligands of CXCR3 but antagonists of CCR3. The complexity of the chemokine network is further increased by the fact that one receptor can be expressed on various leukocyte subsets that might have divergent functions [49,50].

In addition to the conventional chemokine receptors a small family of atypical chemokine receptors (ACKR) has been identified that is comprised of at least four members; ACKR1 (Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines, DARC), ACKR2 (D6), ACKR3 (CXCR7) and ACKR4 (CCRL1). They are seven transmembrane-spanning receptors that resemble the conventional chemokine receptors structurally, but are unable to induce classical chemokine signaling pathways upon chemokine binding [51]. ACKR2 has been extensively characterised and has been shown to bind at least 12 inflammatory CC chemokines, including CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL7, CCL8 and CCL13. It has been implicated in the modulation of inflammatory responses by targeting these chemokines to cellular internalization and degradation [52,53]. In the liver this chemokine scavenging ability has been shown to reduce acute toxic liver injury [54].

In the liver, chemokines are not only involved in leukocyte trafficking but also act on and are secreted by liver resident cells like hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), where they exert pro- as well as anti-fibrotic effects [55].

In the following section(s) we will focus on the chemokines that play a role during inflammatory responses in the liver.

2. Role of Chemokines in Intrahepatic Immunity

The liver is constantly exposed to food and microbial antigens from the gastrointestinal tract and therefore seems to have acquired specialized mechanisms that prevent an overactivation of the innate and adaptive immune system and induces a rather tolerogenic environment. This involves immune cells that can be only or to a higher extent found in the liver, including KCs, the liver-resident macrophages, natural killer (NK) and NKT cells. Furthermore, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), HSCs and hepatocytes can act as antigen presenting cells in addition to dendritic cells (DCs) and KCs [5557]. This special environment also impacts the chemokine-induced recruitment of immune cells to the liver under inflammatory conditions. The chemokine receptors and chemokines, which are of importance in intra-hepatic immunity as well as their expression pattern and function are presented in Table 1 [38,48,58113], whereas Figure 1 shows the mechanisms involved in the recruitment of innate immune cells to the infected liver.

2.1. CXCR3-Binding Chemokines

The CXCR3 chemokine receptor is associated with a type 1 helper T cell (Th1) response. It is predominantly expressed by Th1 cells, but also by CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), NK cells, NKT cells, mast cells and HSCs [58,60,61]. The receptor is activated by the chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11. In hepatocytes, recognition of PAMPs via the RIG-I or TLR3 signaling pathway activates transcription factors like NFκB and IRF3 that drive expression of CXCL10, amongst others. CXCR3-expressing CD8+ T cells, Th1 cells and NK cells that are recruited to the site of infection contribute to CXCL10 secretion by hepatocytes via the release of IFN-γ [96]. Expression of CXCL9 and 10 can be induced by IFN-γ and/or TNFα in several liver resident cells, including hepatocytes, LSECs, HSCs and KCs, promoting further recruitment of CXCR3-expressing cells to the site of infection [59,98,100]. CXCL11 is expressed by LSECs and is strongly induced by IFN-β and IFN-γ. It has a higher affinity for CXCR3 than CXCL9 and 10 and acts as a chemoattractant for activated T cells [97,99]. Additionally, neutrophils recruited to the site of infection produce numerous cytokines and chemokines, including CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 [101].

CXCL4 is together with CCL5 and CXCL7 one of the major chemokines stored in the α-granules of platelets. Release of chemokines by platelets is initiated upon activation by, e.g., thrombin, and is associated with the sealing of vascular wounds and tissue repair [46]. CXCR3-B, a splice variant of CXCR3, has been identified on human microvascular endothelial cells. It acts as a receptor for CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 and mediates the angiostatic effects of these chemokines [102]. CXCR3-B has also been detected on activated T cells but a chemotactic activity initiated by CXCL4 is disputed [46,103].

2.2. CXCR6-Binding Chemokines

The chemokine receptor CXCR6 is expressed by NKT cells, NK cells, activated CD8+ T cells and Th1 cells. CXCL16 is the only known ligand of CXCR6 and is expressed by LSECs and hepatocytes as well as cholangiocytes in the liver [113]. Additionally, CXCL16 is expressed by activated DCs and macrophages. Interaction with CXCL16 is important for the recruitment and retention of CXCR6 expressing effector cells to the liver. For NKT cells CXCR6 has not only been implicated in homing to the liver but also in antigen-dependent NKT cell activation via cell-cell contact with CXCL16-expressing activated DCs [111,112].

2.3. CCR1/5-Binding Chemokines

Whereas the chemokine receptor CCR1 is expressed on monocytes, immature DCs and NK cells, CCR5 expression is characteristic for Th1 cells but can also be found on monocytes, immature DCs, NK cells and other T cells subsets [58,60,61,64]. The chemokines CCL3 and 5 bind to both receptors. In contrast, CCL4 interacts only with CCR5 [38].

Infiltrating macrophages that are recruited by type I interferon-induced CCL2 secretion are the main source for CCL3 in the liver [63,67], but CCL3 is also secreted by activated KCs and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) [59,66]. Furthermore, KCs and endothelial liver cells also secrete CCL5 [62]. HSCs, another liver resident cell type, have been shown to secrete CCL3 and CCL4 upon TLR4-mediated activation [70]. While infiltrating myeloid DCs secrete more CCL3, pDCs secrete more CCL4 and CCL5 [66]. Additionally, non-classical CD14+ CD16+ monocytes that are recruited via CCR1 and CCR5 secrete inflammatory cytokines and chemokines including CCL3 and CCL4 [71].

CCR1 and CCR5 direct immature DCs to sites of inflammation via CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5. Maturation of DCs induced by, e.g., IL-1 or TNFα leads to the rapid loss of CCR1 and CCR5 surface expression and the upregulation of CCR7 on the cell surface. This enables the mature DC to migrate to lymphoid tissues in response to CCL21 for efficient antigen presentation [59,69].

CCL3 and CCL4 recruit NK cells to the site of infection, where they are activated by IL-12 and exert antiviral activity by secretion of IFN-γ [65,68]. Effector T cells are recruited via their CCR5 receptor in addition to chemotactic signals transmitted via their CXCR3 receptor. Depending on the strength of cell surface expression of these two chemokine receptors on different T cell subsets, they might be recruited to different intrahepatic compartments [114,115].

2.4. CCR4-Binding Chemokines

The chemokine receptor CCR4 is categorized as a dual-function chemokine receptor and its ligands CCL17 and CCL22 as dual-function chemokines, as they have roles both in inflammation and in homeostatic cell migration [38]. CCR4 is together with CCR8 a chemokine receptor characteristically expressed by type 2 helper T (Th2) cells. Furthermore, CCR4 is expressed by skin homing and regulatory T cells [80,82,83].

CCL17 and CCL22 can be secreted by DCs, macrophages and monocytes. CCL22 is constitutively secreted by DCs and macrophages, while CCL22-secretion by monocytes is induced by stimulation with IL-4 or IL-13 and inhibited by IL-10. DCs stimulated with TLR ligands like LPS, CpG or poly(I:C) strongly upregulate CCL17 expression. Additionally, secretion of CCL17 by DCs or monocytes is also stimulated by IL-4. Thus a Th2 cytokine milieu stimulates the secretion of CCL17 and CCL22 leading to further recruitment of Th2 cells and Tregs [78,79,81].

2.5. CCR2-Binding Chemokines

The only known receptor for the chemokine CCL2 is the chemokine receptor CCR2 that is predominantly expressed by monocytes, but also by Th1 and Th2 cells and pDCs [48,58]. CCL2 is involved in the recruitment of monocytes, memory T cells and NK cells in vitro and it predominantly recruits monocytes in vivo [72,74,76,77]. Furthermore, CCL2 has been shown to be necessary for the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th2 cells [75].

In the liver, the release of IFN-α/β in response to pathogen recognition induces the secretion of CCL2 by KCs, which leads to the CCR2-dependent recruitment of monocytes and macrophages within 48 h. These infiltrating macrophages are the main source for CCL3 that is involved in the recruitment of NK cells [63,67]. CCR2 expressing pDCs that infiltrate the liver in response to CCL2 also secrete a number of chemokines that are involved in the recruitment of effector T cells (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) as well as monocytes and immature DCs (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5) [66,73]. Additionally, LPS signaling via TLR4 sensitizes HSCs to TGF-β-induced activation by KCs. Activated HSCs secrete various chemokines, including CCL2 and CCL3, and thereby further enhance the infiltration of monocytes [61,70].

2.6. CXCR1/2-Binding Chemokines

The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 are predominantly expressed by neutrophils but can also be found on the surface of monocytes and mast cells [58,60]. CXCR1 has recently been shown to be upregulated on hepatocytes in response to liver injury and CXCR1 positive CD8+ T cells responding to CXCL8 have been detected in different viral infections [8587].

Both receptors bind CXCL8 with high affinity but have a different selectivity for other CXC chemokines [84]. CXCL8 is a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils and can be induced by IL-1 or TNFα in a variety of cells [88,89,92]. In the liver, CXCL8 expression has been shown in LSECs, KCs and hepatocytes upon stimulation. Additionally, CXCL8 can be produced by Th1 and Th17 cells [90,91,93]. Expression of CXCL8 is not only induced by IL-1 or TNFα but also by viral infection or poly(I:C). This direct induction of CXCL8 is dependent on RIG-I signaling and the downstream activation of IRF3 and NFκB, which bind directly to the CXCL8 promotor [94,95].

Neutrophils that are primarily recruited by CXCL8 can exert antiviral immunity amongst others by the release of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-12, TNFα) and chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10) that leads to further recruitment of immune cells to the site of infection [101].

2.7. CXCR4/7-Binding Chemokines

CXCR4 is classified as homeostatic chemokine receptor and is as such abundantly expressed in leukocytes and most human tissues. CXCR4 binds CXCL12 and the non-chemokine ligands ubiquitin and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). As a homeostatic receptor-chemokine-pair, CXCR4-CXCL12 plays amongst others an important role in hematopoiesis, development and organization of the immune system [104106,110]. In the liver, CXCR4 expression by HSCs has been detected and is upregulated upon HSC activation. Furthermore, it has been shown that CXCL12 activates HSCs that then secrete CXCL12, which leads to further activation and proliferation, which has implications for the development of fibrosis [107].

CXCL12 is also a ligand for CXCR7 (ACKR3) a member of the family of atypical chemokine receptors. The affinity of CXCL12 for CXCR7 is higher than for CXCL4 and CXCR7 can modulate the effects of CXCL12 by heterodimerization with CXCR4. Due to their role in neoangiogenesis, the expression and interaction of CXCR4, CXCR7 and CXCL12 has been associated with a variety of tumors [105,108,109].

3. HCV-Mediated Modulation of the Chemokine Response

To be able to fight the virus, antiviral immune cells need to be recruited to the site of the infection. Chemokines play an important role in the chemotaxis of these immune cells. Thus, interference with the expression of chemokines or chemokine receptors would allow HCV to evade host immunity and to establish viral persistence.

Once HCV infection is established, recruited immune cells are responsible for chronic inflammation and liver damage, which may result in further liver disease such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and cancer. The attenuation of intrahepatic immunity during the chronic phase of the infection would thus increase the survival of both the host and the virus.

The HCV-mediated modulation of the chemokine response is discussed in the following section. Figure 2 shows how HSCs, which are the key effector cells of liver fibrogenesis, are modulated during chronic hepatitis C, whereas Table 2 summarizes the HCV-mediated changes in the expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors mentioned in this review [116136].

3.1. CXCR3-Dependent Lymphocyte Recruitment in HCV Infection

Since Th1 cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and NK cells, which play a major role in the defense against viruses, express the chemokine receptor CXCR3, the modulation of CXCR3 expression or of its ligands would represent an efficient viral escape mechanism.

During the initial stages of HCV infection, the expression of CXCR3 ligands such as CXCL10 in infected hepatocytes is caused by TLR3 and RIG-I activation and is further amplified by type I and III IFN induction [137]. However, when HCV replication is established, several HCV proteins interfere with PRR activation and IFN signaling [36]. The HCV NS3/4A protease in particular has been shown to block RIG-I and TLR3 signaling through cleavage of MAVS and TRIF [1820]. Thus, during acute HCV infection CXCR3-associated chemokines start to increase only several weeks after virus acquisition, suggesting a role for cellular immune responses in chemokine induction [138].

In chronic hepatitis C patients, the levels of the three CXCR3 ligands CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 are increased in the liver [132,133,139]. Similarly, experimentally infected chimpanzees are characterized by enhanced intrahepatic levels of CXCL10 and CXCL11 [133]. This is paralleled by a high frequency of CXCR3 positive CD8+ T cells during chronic HCV infection [132,134]. In addition, a CXCL11 promoter polymorphism resulting in decreased CXCL11 expression is more frequent in chronic HCV patients than in healthy controls, emphasizing the importance of CXCR3 positive lymphocytes for HCV clearance [140]. However, although CXCR3 positive T cells may promote HCV clearance in early phases of the infection, they cause tissue injury when the infection persists. It is likely that the CXCR3 positive T cells recruited in the chronically infected liver include both HCV-specific and bystander T cells, since both are thought to contribute to liver injury [141]. Thus, HCV may benefit from limiting the recruitment of CXCR3 positive immune cells by extending the survival of the host. This may explain why liver-specific NS3/4A expression decreases the intrahepatic levels of CXCL9, which diminishes the recruitment of Th1 cells [120,125]. Additionally, NS3/4A blocks the virus-induced transcriptional activation of the CXCL10 promoter [135]. Thus, without the HCV-mediated modulation of CXCR3 ligand expression, liver damage induced by non-specific CXCR3 expressing immune cells may be even higher.

3.2. Involvement of CXCR6 Positive Immune Cells in HCV Infection

In the livers of chronic hepatitis C patients, CXCR6 is expressed on CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK, NKT and B cells, while the CXCR6 ligand CXCL16 is produced by hepatocytes and bile ducts [113,142]. Pretreatment CXCL16 level increase significantly during IFN therapy, suggesting that IFN treatment induces the recruitment of CXCR6 positive immune cells [136]. Most effector T cells infiltrating the chronically inflamed human liver express not only high levels of CCR1, CCR5 and CXCR3 but also CXCR6, so that CXCL16 expression is important for efficient T cell homing to the liver. Recently, a unique subset of HCV-specific CXCR6+ liver-infiltrating CD8+ T cells that express the C-type lectin CD161 and secrete IL-17 and IFN-γ has been described [143]. Furthermore, CXCR6 is also required for the hepatic homing of NK and NKT cells [111].

3.3. Recruitment of CCR1/5 Positive Lymphocytes in HCV Infection

CCR1 and CCR5 are expressed by Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, memory T cells and NK cells. Since CCR5 positive T cells are an integral part of antiviral immunity, a high frequency of these cells can be detected during acute HCV infection [127]. During chronic hepatitis C, the intrahepatic expression of the CCR5 ligands CCL3, 4 and 5 is increased [116,139,144,145]. Whereas HCV core and NS5A have been shown to increase CCL5 expression in cell culture, NS3/4A exerts an inhibitory effect on CCL5 expression [118,119], suggesting that the different HCV proteins have opposing effects on the expression of CCL5. In vivo, liver-specific expression of NS3/4A resulted in a decrease of intrahepatic CCL3 levels [120], supporting the anti-inflammatory role of NS3/4A.

Since the expression of chemokines is cell-specific, the pattern of chemokine secretion in the infected liver of chronic hepatitis C patients is guiding the distribution of T cells to different intrahepatic compartments. While CCR5 ligands are predominantly expressed by vascular endothelium within portal tracts, CXCR3 ligands are amongst others expressed by hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelium [114,139,145,146]. Interestingly, the proportion of CD8+ T cells with CCR1 and CCR5 surface expression is decreased in chronic hepatitis C patients, suggesting that chronic HCV infection induces receptor internalization [117]. This mechanism may contribute to HCV persistence and pathogenesis. The importance of the CCR5 axis for HCV clearance was shown in studies analyzing CCR5 gene polymorphisms. Patients bearing the mutation CCR5-Δ32 that abrogates CCR5 expression have a higher HCV prevalence and are characterized by increased viral loads when infected with HCV [147].

3.4. Hepatic Homing of CCR4 Positive Lymphocytes in HCV Infection

T cell subpopulations such as Th2 cells and Tregs express the chemokine receptor CCR4. Since these cell types interfere with antiviral immunity, the modulation of CCR4 ligands may contribute to viral persistence. Indeed, the expression of the CCR4 ligands CCL17 and CCL22 is enhanced in chronic hepatitis C patients [125,126]. It has been shown that contact of DCs with HCV-infected cells strongly stimulates the expression of CCL17 and CCL22, which act as attractants for Tregs [126]. The HCV protein mediating this effect may be NS3/4A, since mice with liver-specific expression of NS3/4A are characterized by enhanced intrahepatic levels of CCL17 and CCL22 resulting in increased numbers of CCR4 positive CD4+ T cells in the livers of NS3/4A-transgenic mice [120,125]. The HCV-mediated cleavage of the T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase is hereby of major importance [120,148,149].

3.5. CCR2-Dependent Recruitment of Monocytes and Macrophages in HCV Infection

A central factor responsible for macrophage activation and recruitment of monocytes and macrophages to the liver is the chemokine CCL2. In the early phase of the infection, cellular antiviral immunity is initiated by Kupffer cells releasing CCL2, resulting in the recruitment of CCL3-producing monocytes and pDCs, which attract NK cells. Thus, the expression of CCL2 and CCR2 is increased in HCV-infected patients [121,122]. Interestingly, intrahepatic CCL2 expression was further increased in obese HCV-infected subjects as compared to lean HCV-infected subjects, possibly contributing to the faster progression of liver disease in obese subjects with chronic hepatitis C [145]. We found that liver-specific expression of NS3/4A increases the intrahepatic levels of CCL2 and TNF-α, which is paralleled by an enhanced intrahepatic number of macrophages [123]. In addition, NS5A could augment the expression of CCL2 in cell culture [124]. Thus, NS3/4A and NS5A may induce a CCL2-mediated recruitment of macrophages to the liver resulting in increased TNF-α levels.

3.6. CXCR1/2-Expressing Immune Cells during HCV Infection

The CXCR1/2 ligand CXCL8 is involved in the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes to the liver. Since these cell types are involved in antiviral immunity, the levels of CXCL8 are increased in HCV-infected patients compared to healthy controls [128,129]. When the infection persists, CXCL8 expression correlates with the severity of inflammation [150]. Interestingly, elevated levels of CXCL8 in the serum are also associated with resistance to interferon therapy [129]. Several HCV proteins seem to modulate CXCL8 expression. While HCV core, NS4A, NS4B and NS5B induce the expression of CXCL8, NS3/4A decreases CXCL8 expression [119,130,131].

3.7. Liver Fibrosis

When untreated, HCV-induced chronic hepatitis can progress to hepatic fibrosis and ultimately cirrhosis and HCC. Liver fibrosis/cirrhosis is characterized by an excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix leading to the formation of hepatic scar tissue. Activated HSCs and portal fibroblasts are the key effector cells of liver fibrogenesis [151]. Chemokines are involved in liver fibrosis induction both by recruiting inflammatory immune cells and by affecting HSCs. Multiple immune cell types such as monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, NK cells, NKT cells, B cells and T cells are involved in the development of liver fibrosis [151].

CCL2 is the main chemokine responsible for the intrahepatic recruitment of monocytes and macrophages and crucial for the initiation of liver fibrogenesis [152]. In patients infected with HCV, CCL2 levels are increased [122] and the expression of CCR2 is correlated with the fibrosis stage [121]. Thus, a CCL2 promoter polymorphism at position −2578, which is associated with increased CCL2 production, may predispose HCV patients to more severe hepatic inflammation and fibrosis [153].

Furthermore, the receptor CCR5 is involved in fibrogenesis. It has been shown that human HSCs express CCR5 and that CCR5 activation stimulates HSC migration and proliferation [154]. In addition, neutralization studies identified important roles for both CCR1- and CCR5-expressing macrophages in the development of liver fibrosis [155]. Importantly, the intrahepatic levels of the CCR5 ligands CCL3, 4 and 5 are increased in chronic hepatitis C [116].

While neutrophils, NKT cells and B cells are mainly profibrogenic, NK cells seem to have an antifibrotic role. NK cells ameliorate liver fibrosis by killing activated HSCs in a NKG2D- and TRAIL-dependent manner [156]. Since the frequency of NK cells is reduced in the liver of chronic hepatitis C patients [157], the augmentation of chemokine mediated NK cell trafficking to the liver may be an option to treat liver fibrosis.

HCV-derived CD8+ T cells were shown to contribute to HSC activation by an increase in TGF-β and a decrease in IFN-γ expression [158]. Th1 cells are involved in chronic hepatitis by producing proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ. After the initiation of liver fibrosis, IFN-γ is antifibrotic by inducing HSC apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [159]. In this setting, Th2 cells are profibrotic by stimulating collagen synthesis [160]. Interestingly, liver-specific expression of NS3/4A induces an increase in intrahepatic CCL17 and CCL22, which is paralleled by a decrease in CCL3, CXCL9 and CXCL11 resulting in a switch of the Th1/Th2 ratio towards CCR4+ Th2 cells [120,125].

3.8. Liver Cancer

HCV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis and liver fibrosis/cirrhosis are at a high risk of developing HCC. In these patients, repeated cycles of immune-mediated destruction of infected hepatocytes and virus-induced apoptosis together with regeneration of damaged tissue cause disturbances in the normal cellular homeostasis of the liver. While the chemokine-driven infiltration of lymphocytes contributes to cancer development, the recruitment of tumor-specific immune cells is beneficial once the tumor has established. In this case, the expression of CCL5 and CXCL10, which drive tumor infiltration by T and NK cells correlates with patient survival [161]. Similarly, poor survival is associated with an increased intrahepatic frequency of immunosuppressive cell types such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and Tregs [162,163].

4. Chemokine Signaling as Therapeutic Target for Liver-Related Diseases

Since chemokines play an important role in the development of HCV-induced liver disease, inhibition or enhancement of chemokine signaling constitutes an attractive therapy option.

4.1. Acute Liver Injury

Several chemokine receptors such as CCR1, CCR2, CCR5, CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR6 and D6 (ACKR2) are involved in the pathophysiology of acute liver injury mainly by regulating the recruitment of specific immune cell populations.

The chemokine receptor CCR1, which is activated by ligands such as CCL3 and CCL5, has been shown to be involved in the enhancement of acute liver disease. Mice deficient for CCL3 are resistant towards concanavalin A-induced acute liver failure, since the recruitment of CCR1-positive CD4+ T cells is decreased in these mice [164]. In the same model, activation of CCR1 by CCL5 resulted in the intrahepatic infiltration of NK cells causing hepatocyte damage [165]. In contrast, deficiency of CCR5, which shares the ligands CCL3 and CCL5 with CCR1, exerbated T cell-mediated hepatitis in mice. This effect may be mediated by compensation of CCR5-induced effects by CCR1 [166].

The role of CCR2 in acute liver injury can be either harmful or beneficial depending on the used mouse model. Mice deficient for CCR2 are characterized by reduced liver damage and macrophage accumulation after acute carbon tetrachloride injection [167]. Furthermore, treatment with the CCR2 inhibitor propagermanium was able to improve liver injury induced by concanavalin A, Corynebacterium parvum and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection [168,169]. However, acetaminophen-induced liver damage was increased in CCR2-deficient mice, most probably by preventing macrophage-mediated neutrophil apoptosis and phagocytosis of cell debris [170].

In addition, it was shown that the chemokine scavenger receptor D6 is limiting acute toxic liver injury. Mice deficient for D6 were characterized by increased infiltration of NK and T cells resulting in enhanced liver damage after acute carbon tetrachloride treatment [54]. Furthermore, genetic variations of D6 contribute to the grade of liver inflammation in patients infected with HCV [171].

The receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 are involved in neutrophil-induced acute inflammatory liver injury. High levels of the CXCR1/CXCR2 ligand CXCL8 in the liver and the circulation have been found in patients with acute liver injuries such as alcoholic hepatitis or ischemia-reperfusion injury [172]. Furthermore, CXCR2 deficient mice had significantly less liver injury after ischemia/reperfusion than control mice [173]. Importantly, treatment with the CXCR2 antagonist SB225002 [173] or the CXCR1/2 inhibitor repertaxin [174] was able to prevent reperfusion injury.

Interestingly, mice deficient for CXCR3 developed a more severe liver injury with higher plasma transaminase levels and a more pronounced Th1/Th17 response compared with control mice when treated with concanavalin A. This effect was caused by decreased recruitment of IL10-producing CXCR3+ Tregs [175]. These results are in line with a study analyzing the role of CXCR3 in carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury [176]. However, since studies investigating ischemia-reperfusion injury [177] or adenovirus-induced liver injury [178] describe harmful effects mediated by CXCR3, the role of CXCR3 in acute liver injury seems to be dependent on the applied mouse model.

Recently, it was shown that NKT cells exert proinflammatory effects and promote acute liver injury in a CXCR6-dependent way [179]. Furthermore, inhibition of the CXCR6 ligand CXCL16 by neutralizing antibodies was able to decrease liver injury induced by Bacille Calmette-Guerin and lipopolysaccharide injection [180], indicating the important role of the CXCL16-CXCR6 axis in the induction of acute liver injury.

Thus, blockade of CCR1, CXCR2 and CXCR6 as well as activation of D6 may be beneficial in the treatment of acute fulminant hepatitis.

4.2. Metabolic Syndrome

The CCL2-CCR2 axis also seems to be involved in the modulation of liver steatosis and diabetes. CCL2 was enhanced both in the liver and the serum of diabetic mice, which was paralleled by hepatic accumulation of macrophages. Interestingly, treatment with the CCR2 antagonist RS504393 was able to ameliorate hyperglycaemia, liver steatosis and liver inflammation [181]. Similarly, treatment with the CCR2 inhibitor propagermanium could improve diet-induced metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance and liver steatosis [182]. Thus, interruption of the CCL2/CCR2 pathway may provide an effective therapeutic strategy for attenuating the progression of liver steatosis and of associated metabolic disorders.

4.3. Liver Fibrosis

By using different mouse models for liver fibrosis such as bile duct ligation or treatment with carbon tetrachloride, it was shown that both CCR1 and CCR5 promote hepatic fibrosis [155]. By contrast, liver fibrosis development in MDR2 deficient mice is only dependent on CCR5 but not on CCR1 [183], thus confirming the role of CCR5 as promotor of liver fibrosis. However, the relevance of CCR1 for fibrosis induction remains unclear.

In addition, the CCR2 ligand CCL2 is involved in liver fibrosis development by recruiting CCR2-expressing inflammatory macrophages [184,185]. However, while treatment with the CCL2 inhibitor mNOX-E36 resulted in a decrease of monocyte/macrophage infiltration and hepatic steatosis in the murine models of carbon tetrachloride- and MCD diet-induced hepatic injury, mNOX-E36 application was not able to alter fibrosis progression [186].

Since profibrogenic functions of HSCs are induced through CXCR2 [187] and the CXCR2 ligand CXCL8 is associated with hepatic macrophage accumulation in human liver fibrosis [188], CXCR2 evolved as an attractive target for liver fibrosis treatment.

The CXCR3 ligands CXCL4, CXCL9 and CXCL10 seem to have divergent functions in liver fibrosis. While CXCL4 and CXCL10 are profibrogenic, CXCL9 has been shown to exert mainly antifibrotic effects. CXCL4-deficient mice treated with carbon tetrachloride or thioacetamide developed a less severe liver fibrosis as compared to control mice, which may be explained by a reduced hepatic infiltration of CD8+ T cells [189]. Similarly, CXCL10-deficient mice showed massively reduced liver fibrosis upon carbon tetrachloride administration by inducing the inactivation of HSCs by NK cells [190]. In contrast, CXCL9 represses collagen expression in HSCs and is antifibrotic in humans and mice [191].

Furthermore, it was shown that HSCs express the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and that CXCR4 activation by CXCL12 is profibrogenic by increasing HSC activation and proliferation [107]. In vivo, fibrosis development is regulated by the balance between the CXCL12 receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7. While after acute injury pro-regenerative CXCR7 signaling is activated, chronic liver injury results in loss of CXCR7 and upregulation of profibrotic CXCR4 [192]. Interestingly, a CXCR4 antagonist (plerixafor) is already approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

In addition, CXCR6 promotes hepatic fibrogenesis, since CXCR6-deficient mice were protected from liver fibrosis progression in two different mouse models. CXCR6-expressing NKT cells were found to induce hepatic inflammation and to recruit macrophages resulting in liver fibrosis [179].

Thus, CCR5, CXCR2, CXCR4 and CXCR6 antagonists or the application of CXCL9 may serve for prevention and treatment of liver fibrosis.

4.4. Liver Cancer

The receptors CCR1 and CCR5 play also crucial roles in tumorigenesis. Whereas HCC induced by N-nitrosodiethylamine treatment occurred more frequently in both CCL3- and CCR1-deficient mice compared with control mice, tumor burden was dramatically reduced by CCL3 or CCR1 deficiency [193]. The critical role of CCR1 in tumor progression was confirmed in the MDR2 knockout model, in which mice deficient for CCR1 and MDR2 had smaller tumors than MDR2 knockout mice [183]. In contrast to CCR1, CCR5 promotes both the development and progression of liver cancer [183], suggesting that CCR5 antagonists may be very useful in HCC prevention and therapy.

Selective recruitment of immune cells with anti-inflammatory functions such as MDSCs and Tregs is one of the mechanisms of tumor-driven immune evasion as they suppress T cell and NK cell mediated anti-tumor functions. An increase in MDSC frequency has been shown both in patients with HCC [163] and in different HCC mouse models [194]. Thus, targeting of MDSC, which express CXCR2 might be an option to treat HCC. Interestingly, treatment with α-CXCL1 was able to reduce the intrahepatic MDSC frequency in mice with HCC [194].

An increase in Treg frequency was found in both peripheral blood and tumor margin of HCC patients, which correlates with poor survival [162]. Thus, blocking of pathways involved in Treg recruitment would be an option to decrease the frequency of Tregs in the tumor tissue and prevent immune escape in HCC. Major chemokine receptors involved in the migration of Tregs to the liver are CCR4, CCR6 and CXCR3. Unfortunately, these chemokine receptors are also expressed by immune cells involved in anti-tumor immunity. CXCR3 e.g., is also highly expressed on NK, Th1 and Th17 cells.

Recently, it was shown that the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway is involved in tumor-associated fibrosis by increasing myofibroblast infiltration and differentiation [195]. Addition of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to sorafenib in an HCC mouse model prevented the increase in tumor-associated fibrosis and significantly inhibited HCC growth compared to sorafenib alone [195]. Besides of CXCR4, CXCL12 can bind to CXCR7. CXCR7 is overexpressed in liver cancer tissue and positively regulates the invasion, angiogenesis and tumor growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells [196].

5. Conclusions

The successful introduction of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc in HIV therapy [197] suggests that the modulation of chemokine signaling may be feasible for the therapy of HCV-mediated diseases as well.

However, it should always be taken into account that the blockade of antiviral immune cells may result in a rebound of virus titers. This may be solved by combining immunotherapies (directed, e.g., against liver fibrosis) with direct antivirals. The stage of the disease also plays a role. While a dampening of the intrahepatic immune response may be beneficial during acute or chronic hepatitis, a strengthening of the anti-tumoral immune response during HCC is the aim.

One further concern is the redundancy of the chemokine system. Most of the receptors can bind more than one ligand and several chemokines can signal through more than one receptor. Thus, the blockade of one receptor or ligand may cause compensatory effects such as the upregulation of other receptors or ligands resulting in undesired side effects.

In addition, there are differences in the expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors between mice and humans, complicating the translation of mouse data to the clinic. While the receptor CCR1 is constitutively expressed by neutrophils in mice [198], CCR1 is a major receptor for monocyte recruitment in humans and has only a low expression in neutrophils [199].

Furthermore, most chemokine receptors are expressed by different immune cells. One example is CXCR3, which is expressed by Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, Tregs, NK cells, NKT cells and HSCs. While the treatment of CXCR3-deficient mice with concanavalin A results in a decreased recruitment of IL10-producing CXCR3+ Tregs [175], CXCR3 blockade in a model for ischemia-reperfusion injury causes a reduction in intrahepatic Th1 cells [177].

Thus, targeting of the chemokine system requires a careful selection of the appropriate target. The stage of the disease and possible discrepancies between the murine and the human system have to be taken into account. However, the approval of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc and the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor as well as ongoing clinical trials against diverse diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or Crohn’s disease show the great potential of therapies modulating the chemokine response.

Acknowledgments

EDB was supported by grants from the Swedish Society for Medical Research, the Ruth and Richard Julin Foundation, the Goljes Memorial Fund, the Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation, the Erik and Edith Fernström Foundation, the Professor Nanna Svartz Fund, the Åke Wiberg Foundation and from Karolinska Institutet. AB received a postdoctoral grant from Karolinska Institutet/Södertörn University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACKRatypical chemokine receptor
DAAdirect acting antiviral
DCdendritic cell
gtgenotype
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HCVhepatitis C virus
HSChepatic stellate cell
IFNinterferon
ILinterleukin
IRFinterferon regulatory factor
LPSlipopolysaccaride
LSECliver sinusoidal endothelial cell
MAVSmitochondrial antiviral signaling protein
MDSCmyeloid-derived suppressor cell
NFκBnuclear factor κB
KCKupffer cell
NK cellnatural killer cell
NSnon-structural
pegIFNpegylated interferon-α
PAMPpathogen associated molecular pattern
pDCplasmacytoid dendritic cell
PKRprotein kinase R
PRRpattern recognition receptor
RBVribavirin
RIG-Iretinoic acid inducible gene-I
TCPTPT cell protein tyrosine phosphatase
TGFtransforming growth factor
ThT-helper
TLRToll-like receptor
TNFtumor necrosis factor
TRIFTIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing-interferon-β
Tregregulatory T cell

References

  1. Lavanchy, D. The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2009, 29, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lavanchy, D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoofnagle, J.H. Hepatitis C: The clinical spectrum of disease. Hepatology 1997, 26, 15S–20S. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arzumanyan, A.; Reis, H.M.G.P.V.; Feitelson, M.A. Pathogenic mechanisms in HBV- and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moradpour, D.; Penin, F.; Rice, C.M. Replication of hepatitis C virus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 453–463. [Google Scholar]
  6. Penin, F.; Dubuisson, J.; Rey, F.A.; Moradpour, D.; Pawlotsky, J.-M. Structural biology of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2004, 39, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakano, T.; Lau, G.M.G.; Lau, G.M.L.; Sugiyama, M.; Mizokami, M. An updated analysis of hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes based on the complete coding region. Liver Int. 2011, 32, 339–345. [Google Scholar]
  8. Micallef, J.M.; Kaldor, J.M.; Dore, G.J. Spontaneous viral clearance following acute hepatitis C infection: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. J. Viral Hepat. 2006, 13, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bode, J.G.; Brenndorfer, E.D.; Haussinger, D. Subversion of innate host antiviral strategies by the hepatitis C virus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 462, 254–265. [Google Scholar]
  10. Loo, Y.-M.; Owen, D.M.; Li, K.; Erickson, A.K.; Johnson, C.L.; Fish, P.M.; Carney, D.S.; Wang, T.; Ishida, H.; Yoneyama, M.; et al. Viral and therapeutic control of IFN-β promoter stimulator 1 during hepatitis C virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6001–6006. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saito, T.; Owen, D.M.; Jiang, F.; Marcotrigiano, J.; Gale, M., Jr. Innate immunity induced by composition-dependent RIG-I recognition of hepatitis C virus RNA. Nature 2008, 454, 523–527. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, N.; Liang, Y.; Devaraj, S.; Wang, J.; Lemon, S.M.; Li, K. Toll-like receptor 3 mediates establishment of an antiviral state against hepatitis C virus in hepatoma cells. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 9824–9834. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, J.; Lu, M.; Meng, Z.; Trippler, M.; Broering, R.; Szczeponek, A.; Krux, F.; Dittmer, U.; Roggendorf, M.; Gerken, G.; et al. Toll-like receptor-mediated control of HBV replication by nonparenchymal liver cells in mice. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar]
  14. Seki, E.; Brenner, D.A. Toll-like receptors and adaptor molecules in liver disease: Update. Hepatology 2008, 48, 322–335. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, K.; Li, N.L.; Wei, D.; Pfeffer, S.R.; Fan, M.; Pfeffer, L.M. Activation of chemokine and inflammatory cytokine response in hepatitis C virus-infected hepatocytes depends on toll-like receptor 3 sensing of hepatitis C virus double-stranded RNA intermediates. Hepatology 2012, 55, 666–675. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shimoike, T.; McKenna, S.A.; Lindhout, D.A.; Puglisi, J.D. Translational insensitivity to potent activation of PKR by HCV IRES RNA. Antivir. Res. 2009, 83, 228–237. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnaud, N.; Dabo, S.; Akazawa, D.; Fukasawa, M.; Shinkai-Ouchi, F.; Hugon, J.; Wakita, T.; Meurs, E.F. Hepatitis C virus reveals a novel early control in acute immune response. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002289. [Google Scholar]
  18. Meylan, E.; Curran, J.; Hofmann, K.; Moradpour, D.; Binder, M.; Bartenschlager, R.; Tschopp, J. Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus. Nature 2005, 437, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, X.D.; Sun, L.; Seth, R.B.; Pineda, G.; Chen, Z.J. Hepatitis C virus protease NS3/4A cleaves mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein off the mitochondria to evade innate immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17717–17722. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, K.; Foy, E.; Ferreon, J.C.; Nakamura, M.; Ferreon, A.C.; Ikeda, M.; Ray, S.C.; Gale, M., Jr; Lemon, S.M. Immune evasion by hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease-mediated cleavage of the Toll-like receptor 3 adaptor protein TRIF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2992–2997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gale, M.J.; Korth, M.J.; Tang, N.M.; Tan, S.L.; Hopkins, D.A.; Dever, T.E.; Polyak, S.J.; Gretch, D.R.; Katze, M.G. Evidence that hepatitis C virus resistance to interferon is mediated through repression of the PKR protein kinase by the nonstructural 5A protein. Virology 1997, 230, 217–227. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pavio, N.; Taylor, D.R.; Lai, M.M.C. Detection of a novel unglycosylated form of hepatitis C virus E2 envelope protein that is located in the cytosol and interacts with PKR. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor, D.R.; Shi, S.T.; Romano, P.R.; Barber, G.N.; Lai, M.M. Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein. Science 1999, 285, 107–110. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ge, D.; Fellay, J.; Thompson, A.J.; Simon, J.S.; Shianna, K.V.; Urban, T.J.; Heinzen, E.L.; Qiu, P.; Bertelsen, A.H.; Muir, A.J.; et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature 2009, 461, 399–401. [Google Scholar]
  25. Poordad, F.; McCone, J.; Bacon, B.R.; Bruno, S.; Manns, M.P.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Jacobson, I.M.; Reddy, K.R.; Goodman, Z.D.; Boparai, N.; et al. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 1195–1206. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jacobson, I.M.; McHutchison, J.G.; Dusheiko, G.; di Bisceglie, A.M.; Reddy, K.R.; Bzowej, N.H.; Marcellin, P.; Muir, A.J.; Ferenci, P.; Flisiak, R.; et al. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 2405–2416. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fried, M.W.; Buti, M.; Dore, G.J.; Flisiak, R.; Ferenci, P.; Jacobson, I.; Marcellin, P.; Manns, M.; Nikitin, I.; Poordad, F.; et al. Once-daily simeprevir (TMC435) with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in treatment-naïve genotype 1 hepatitis C: The randomized PILLAR study. Hepatology 2013, 58, 1918–1929. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gane, E.J.; Stedman, C.A.; Hyland, R.H.; Ding, X.; Svarovskaia, E.; Symonds, W.T.; Hindes, R.G.; Berrey, M.M. Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for hepatitis C. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 34–44. [Google Scholar]
  29. Flisiak, R.; Jaroszewicz, J.; Parfieniuk-Kowerda, A. Emerging treatments for hepatitis C. Exp. Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2013, 18, 461–475. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sulkowski, M.S.; Gardiner, D.F.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Reddy, K.R.; Hassanein, T.; Jacobson, I.; Lawitz, E.; Lok, A.S.; Hinestrosa, F.; Thuluvath, P.J.; et al. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 211–221. [Google Scholar]
  31. Westra, I.M.; Oosterhuis, D.; Groothuis, G.M.M.; Olinga, P. Precision-cut liver slices as a model for the early onset of liver fibrosis to test antifibrotic drugs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 274, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hong, F.; Chou, H.; Fiel, M.I.; Friedman, S.L. Antifibrotic activity of sorafenib in experimental hepatic fibrosis: Refinement of inhibitory targets dosing and window of efficacy in vivo. Digest. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilhelm, S.M.; Adnane, L.; Newell, P.; Villanueva, A.; Llovet, J.M.; Lynch, M. Preclinical overview of sorafenib a multikinase inhibitor that targets both Raf and VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 3129–3140. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Ma, J.; Jiang, H. New insights into the antifibrotic effects of sorafenib on hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 2010, 53, 132–144. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bowen, D.G.; Walker, C.M. Adaptive immune responses in acute and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Nature 2005, 436, 946–952. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bode, J.G.; Brenndorfer, E.D.; Haussinger, D. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) employs multiple strategies to subvert the host innate antiviral response. Biol. Chem. 2008, 389, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar]
  37. Brenndorfer, E.D.; Sallberg, M. Hepatitis C virus-mediated modulation of cellular immunity. Arch. Immun. Ther. Exp. 2012, 60, 315–329. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zlotnik, A.; Yoshie, O. The chemokine superfamily revisited. Immunity 2012, 36, 705–716. [Google Scholar]
  39. Luster, A.D. Chemokines—Chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 436–445. [Google Scholar]
  40. Moser, B.; Wolf, M.; Walz, A.; Loetscher, P. Chemokines: Multiple levels of leukocyte migration control. Trends Immun. 2004, 25, 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhu, Y.; Murakami, F. Chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors in the developing central nervous system: Emerging themes and future perspectives. Dev. Neurobiol. 2012, 72, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zou, Y.R.; Kottmann, A.H.; Kuroda, M.; Taniuchi, I.; Littman, D.R. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 1998, 393, 595–599. [Google Scholar]
  43. Calderon, L.; Boehm, T. Three chemokine receptors cooperatively regulate homing of hematopoietic progenitors to the embryonic mouse thymus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7517–7122. [Google Scholar]
  44. Esche, C.; Stellato, C.; Beck, L.A. Chemokines: Key players in innate and adaptive immunity. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005, 125, 615–628. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dimberg, A. Chemokines in angiogenesis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immun. 2010, 341, 59–80. [Google Scholar]
  46. Flad, H.D.; Brandt, E. Platelet-derived chemokines: Pathophysiology and therapeutic aspects. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 2363–2386. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zlotnik, A.; Yoshie, O.; Nomiyama, H. The chemokine and chemokine receptor superfamilies and their molecular evolution. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, 243. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oo, Y.H.; Adams, D.H. The role of chemokines in the recruitment of lymphocytes to the liver. J. Autoimmun. 2010, 34, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schall, T.J.; Proudfoot, A.E. I Overcoming hurdles in developing successful drugs targeting chemokine receptors. Nat. Publ. Gr. 2011, 11, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  50. Loetscher, P.; Pellegrino, A.; Gong, J.H.; Mattioli, I.; Loetscher, M.; Bardi, G.; Baggiolini, M.; Clark-Lewis, I. The ligands of CXC chemokine receptor 3 I-TAC Mig and IP10 are natural antagonists for CCR3. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 2986–2991. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nibbs, R.J.B.; Graham, G.J. Immune regulation by atypical chemokine receptors. Nat. Rev. Immun. 2013, 13, 815–829. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fra, A.M.; Locati, M.; Otero, K.; Sironi, M.; Signorelli, P.; Massardi, M.L.; Gobbi, M.; Vecchi, A.; Sozzani, S.; Mantovani, A. Cutting edge: Scavenging of inflammatory CC chemokines by the promiscuous putatively silent chemokine receptor D6. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 2279–2282. [Google Scholar]
  53. Nibbs, R.J.; Wylie, S.M.; Yang, J.; Landau, N.R.; Graham, G.J. Cloning and characterization of a novel promiscuous human β-chemokine receptor D6. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32078–32083. [Google Scholar]
  54. Berres, M.L.; Trautwein, C.; Zaldivar, M.M.; Schmitz, P.; Pauels, K.; Lira, S.A.; Tacke, F.; Wasmuth, H.E. The chemokine scavenging receptor D6 limits acute toxic liver injury in vivo. Biol. Chem. 2009, 390, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wasmuth, H.; Tacke, F.; Trautwein, C. Chemokines in liver inflammation and fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010, 30, 215–225. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nemeth, E.; Baird, A.W.; O’Farrelly, C. Microanatomy of the liver immune system. Semin. Immunopathol. 2009, 31, 333–343. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tiegs, G.; Lohse, A.W. Immune tolerance: What is unique about the liver. J. Autoimmun. 2010, 34, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bonecchi, R.; Bianchi, G.; Bordignon, P.P.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Lang, R.; Borsatti, A.; Sozzani, S.; Allavena, P.; Gray, P.A.; Mantovani, A.; et al. Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  59. Crispe, I.N. Hepatic T cells and liver tolerance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  60. Viola, A.; Luster, A.D. Chemokines and their receptors: Drug targets in immunity and inflammation. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008, 48, 171–197. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zimmermann, H.W.; Tacke, F. Modification of chemokine pathways and immune cell infiltration as a novel therapeutic approach in liver inflammation and fibrosis. Inflamm. Allerg. Drug Targets 2011, 10, 509–536. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bautista, A.P. Chronic alcohol intoxication primes Kupffer cells and endothelial cells for enhanced CC-chemokine production and concomitantly suppresses phagocytosis and chemotaxis. Front. Biosci. 2002, 7, a117–a125. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hokeness, K.L.; Kuziel, W.A.; Biron, C.A.; Salazar-Mather, T.P. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and CCR2 interactions are required for IFN-α/β-induced inflammatory responses and antiviral defense in liver. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 1549–1556. [Google Scholar]
  64. Loetscher, P.; Uguccioni, M.; Bordoli, L.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B.; Chizzolini, C.; Dayer, J.M. CCR5 is characteristic of Th1 lymphocytes. Nature 1998, 391, 344–345. [Google Scholar]
  65. Megjugorac, N.J.; Young, H.A.; Amrute, S.B.; Olshalsky, S.L.; Fitzgerald-Bocarsly, P. Virally stimulated plasmacytoid dendritic cells produce chemokines and induce migration of T and NK cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 75, 504–514. [Google Scholar]
  66. Piqueras, B.; Connolly, J.; Freitas, H.; Palucka, A.K.; Banchereau, J. Upon viral exposure myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells produce 3 waves of distinct chemokines to recruit immune effectors. Blood 2006, 107, 2613–2618. [Google Scholar]
  67. Salazar-Mather, T.P.; Lewis, C.A.; Biron, C.A. Type I interferons regulate inflammatory cell trafficking and macrophage inflammatory protein 1α delivery to the liver. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  68. Salazar-Mather, T.P.; Orange, J.S.; Biron, C.A. Early murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection induces liver natural killer (NK) cell inflammation and protection through macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP-1α)-dependent pathways. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sallusto, F.; Schaerli, P.; Loetscher, P.; Schaniel, C.; Lenig, D.; Mackay, C.R.; Qin, S.; Lanzavecchia, A. Rapid and coordinated switch in chemokine receptor expression during dendritic cell maturation. Eur. J. Immunol. 1998, 28, 2760–2769. [Google Scholar]
  70. Seki, E.; De Minicis, S.; Österreicher, C.H.; Kluwe, J.; Osawa, Y.; Brenner, D.A.; Schwabe, R.F. TLR4 enhances TGF-β signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zimmermann, H.W.; Seidler, S.; Nattermann, J.; Gassler, N.; Hellerbrand, C.; Zernecke, A.; Tischendorf, J.J.W.; Luedde, T.; Weiskirchen, R.; Trautwein, C.; et al. Functional contribution of elevated circulating and hepatic non-classical CD14CD16 monocytes to inflammation and human liver fibrosis. PLoS One 2010, 5, e11049. [Google Scholar]
  72. Carr, M.W.; Roth, S.J.; Luther, E.; Rose, S.S.; Springer, T.A. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 acts as a T-lymphocyte chemoattractant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 3652–3656. [Google Scholar]
  73. Decalf, J.; Fernandes, S.; Longman, R.; Ahloulay, M.; Audat, F.; Lefrerre, F.; Rice, C.M.; Pol, S.; Albert, M.L. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells initiate a complex chemokine and cytokine network and are a viable drug target in chronic HCV patients. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2423–2437. [Google Scholar]
  74. Fuentes, M.E.; Durham, S.K.; Swerdel, M.R.; Lewin, A.C.; Barton, D.S.; Megill, J.R.; Bravo, R.; Lira, S.A. Controlled recruitment of monocytes and macrophages to specific organs through transgenic expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 5769–5776. [Google Scholar]
  75. Gu, L.; Tseng, S.; Horner, R.M.; Tam, C.; Loda, M.; Rollins, B.J. Control of TH2 polarization by the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Nature 2000, 404, 407–411. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gunn, M.D.; Nelken, N.A.; Liao, X.; Williams, L.T. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is sufficient for the chemotaxis of monocytes and lymphocytes in transgenic mice but requires an additional stimulus for inflammatory activation. J. Immunol. 1997, 158, 376–383. [Google Scholar]
  77. Maghazachi, A.A.; al-Aoukaty, A.; Schall, T.J. C-C chemokines induce the chemotaxis of NK and IL-2-activated NK cells Role for G proteins. J. Immunol. 1994, 153, 4969–4977. [Google Scholar]
  78. Alferink, J.; Lieberam, I.; Reindl, W.; Behrens, A.; Weiss, S.; Hüser, N.; Gerauer, K.; Ross, R.; Reske-Kunz, A.B.; Ahmad-Nejad, P.; et al. Compartmentalized production of CCL17 in vivo: Strong inducibility in peripheral dendritic cells contrasts selective absence from the spleen. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 585–599. [Google Scholar]
  79. Andrew, D.P.; Chang, M.S.; McNinch, J.; Wathen, S.T.; Rihanek, M.; Tseng, J.; Spellberg, J.P.; Elias, C.G. STCP-1 (MDC) CC chemokine acts specifically on chronically activated Th2 lymphocytes and is produced by monocytes on stimulation with Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 5027–5038. [Google Scholar]
  80. Hirahara, K.; Liu, L.; Clark, R.A.; Yamanaka, K.-i.; Fuhlbrigge, R.C.; Kupper, T.S. The majority of human peripheral blood CD4+ CD25highFoxp3+ regulatory T cells bear functional skin-homing receptors. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 4488–4494. [Google Scholar]
  81. Imai, T.; Nagira, M.; Takagi, S.; Kakizaki, M.; Nishimura, M.; Wang, J.; Gray, P.W.; Matsushima, K.; Yoshie, O. Selective recruitment of CCR4-bearing Th2 cells toward antigen-presenting cells by the CC chemokines thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and macrophage-derived chemokine. Int. Immunol. 1999, 11, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mariani, M.; Lang, R.; Binda, E.; Panina-Bordignon, P.; D’Ambrosio, D. Dominance of CCL22 over CCL17 in induction of chemokine receptor CCR4 desensitization and internalization on human Th2 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 231–240. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sallusto, F.; Lenig, D.; Mackay, C.R.; Lanzavecchia, A. Flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression on human polarized T helper 1 and 2 lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 875–883. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ahuja, S.K.; Murphy, P.M. The CXC chemokines growth-regulated oncogene GROα GROβ GROγ neutrophil-activating peptide-2 and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating peptide-78 are potent agonists for the type B but not the type A human interleukin-8 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20545–20550. [Google Scholar]
  85. Clarke, C.; Kuboki, S.; Sakai, N.; Kasten, K.R.; Tevar, A.D.; Schuster, R.; Blanchard, J.; Caldwell, C.C.; Edwards, M.J.; Lentsch, A.B. CXC chemokine receptor-1 is expressed by hepatocytes and regulates liver recovery after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Hepatology 2011, 53, 261–271. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hess, C.; Means, T.K.; Autissier, P.; Woodberry, T.; Altfeld, M.; Addo, M.M.; Frahm, N.; Brander, C.; Walker, B.D.; Luster, A.D. IL-8 responsiveness defines a subset of CD8 T cells poised to kill. Blood 2004, 104, 3463–3471. [Google Scholar]
  87. Heydtmann, M.; Adams, D.H. Chemokines in the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C infection. Hepatology 2009, 49, 676–688. [Google Scholar]
  88. Huber, A.R.; Kunkel, S.L.; Todd, R.F.; Weiss, S.J. Regulation of transendothelial neutrophil migration by endogenous interleukin-8. Science 1991, 254, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  89. Matsushima, K.; Oppenheim, J.J. Interleukin 8 and MCAF: Novel inflammatory cytokines inducible by IL 1 and TNF. Cytokine 1989, 1, 2–13. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ohkubo, K.; Masumoto, T.; Horiike, N.; Onji, M. Induction of CINC (interleukin-8) production in rat liver by non-parenchymal cells. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1998, 13, 696–702. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pelletier, M.; Maggi, L.; Micheletti, A.; Lazzeri, E.; Tamassia, N.; Costantini, C.; Cosmi, L.; Lunardi, C.; Annunziato, F.; Romagnani, S.; et al. Evidence for a cross-talk between human neutrophils and Th17 cells. Blood 2010, 115, 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  92. Strieter, R.M.; Kunkel, S.L.; Showell, H.J.; Remick, D.G.; Phan, S.H.; Ward, P.A.; Marks, R.M. Endothelial cell gene expression of a neutrophil chemotactic factor by TNF-α LPS and IL-1β. Science 1989, 243, 1467–1469. [Google Scholar]
  93. Thornton, A.J.; Strieter, R.M.; Lindley, I.; Baggiolini, M.; Kunkel, S.L. Cytokine-induced gene expression of a neutrophil chemotactic factor/IL-8 in human hepatocytes. J. Immunol. 1990, 144, 2609–2613. [Google Scholar]
  94. Van Damme, J.; Decock, B.; Lenaerts, J.P.; Conings, R.; Bertini, R.; Mantovani, A.; Billiau, A. Identification by sequence analysis of chemotactic factors for monocytes produced by normal and transformed cells stimulated with virus double-stranded RNA or cytokine. Eur. J. Immunol. 1989, 19, 2367–2373. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wagoner, J.; Austin, M.; Green, J.; Imaizumi, T.; Casola, A.; Brasier, A.; Khabar, K.S.A.; Wakita, T.; Gale, M.; Polyak, S.J. Regulation of CXCL-8 (interleukin-8) induction by double-stranded RNA signaling pathways during hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 309–318. [Google Scholar]
  96. Brownell, J.; Polyak, S.J. Molecular pathways: Hepatitis C virus CXCL10 and the inflammatory road to liver cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1347–1352. [Google Scholar]
  97. Cole, K.E.; Strick, C.A.; Paradis, T.J.; Ogborne, K.T.; Loetscher, M.; Gladue, R.P.; Lin, W.; Boyd, J.G.; Moser, B.; Wood, D.E.; et al. Interferon-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC): A novel non-ELR CXC chemokine with potent activity on activated T cells through selective high affinity binding to CXCR3. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 2009–2021. [Google Scholar]
  98. Crispe, I.N. Migration of lymphocytes into hepatic sinusoids. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 218–220. [Google Scholar]
  99. Helbig, K.J.; Ruszkiewicz, A.; Semendric, L.; Harley, H.A.J.; McColl, S.R.; Beard, M.R. Expression of the CXCR3 ligand I-TAC by hepatocytes in chronic hepatitis C and its correlation with hepatic inflammation. Hepatology 2004, 39, 1220–1229. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hokeness, K.L.; Deweerd, E.S.; Munks, M.W.; Lewis, C.A.; Gladue, R.P.; Salazar-Mather, T.P. CXCR3-dependent recruitment of antigen-specific T lymphocytes to the liver during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar]
  101. Mantovani, A.; Cassatella, M.A.; Costantini, C.; Jaillon, S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 519–531. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lasagni, L.; Francalanci, M.; Annunziato, F.; Lazzeri, E.; Giannini, S.; Cosmi, L.; Sagrinati, C.; Mazzinghi, B.; Orlando, C.; Maggi, E.; et al. An Alternatively spliced bariant of CXCR3 mediates the inhibition of endothelial cell growth induced by IP-10 mig and I-TAC and acts as functional receptor for platelet factor 4. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1537–1549. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mueller, A.; Meiser, A.; McDonagh, E.M.; Fox, J.M.; Petit, S.J.; Xanthou, G.; Williams, T.J.; Pease, J.E. CXCL4-induced migration of activated T lymphocytes is mediated by the chemokine receptor CXCR3. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008, 83, 875–882. [Google Scholar]
  104. Bernhagen, J.; Krohn, R.; Lue, H.; Gregory, J.L.; Zernecke, A.; Koenen, R.R.; Dewor, M.; Georgiev, I.; Schober, A.; Leng, L.; et al. MIF is a noncognate ligand of CXC chemokine receptors in inflammatory and atherogenic cell recruitment. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 587–596. [Google Scholar]
  105. Burns, J.M.; Summers, B.C.; Wang, Y.; Melikian, A.; Berahovich, R.; Miao, Z.; Penfold, M.E.T.; Sunshine, M.J.; Littman, D.R.; Kuo, C.J.; et al. A novel chemokine receptor for SDF-1 and I-TAC involved in cell survival cell adhesion and tumor development. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 2201–2213. [Google Scholar]
  106. Gupta, S.K.; Pillarisetti, K. Cutting edge: CXCR4-Lo: Molecular cloning and functional expression of a novel human CXCR4 splice variant. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 2368–2372. [Google Scholar]
  107. Hong, F.; Tuyama, A.; Lee, T.F.; Loke, J.; Agarwal, R.; Cheng, X.; Garg, A.; Fiel, M.I.; Schwartz, M.; Walewski, J.; et al. Hepatic stellate cells express functional CXCR4: Role in stromal cell-derived factor-1α-mediated stellate cell activation. Hepatology 2009, 49, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar]
  108. Levoye, A.; Balabanian, K.; Baleux, F.; Bachelerie, F.; Lagane, B. CXCR7 heterodimerizes with CXCR4 and regulates CXCL12-mediated G protein signaling. Blood 2009, 113, 6085–6093. [Google Scholar]
  109. Maksym, R.B.; Tarnowski, M.; Grymula, K.; Tarnowska, J.; Wysoczynski, M.; Liu, R.; Czerny, B.; Ratajczak, J.; Kucia, M.; Ratajczak, M.Z. The role of stromal-derived factor-1—CXCR7 axis in development and cancer. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 625, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  110. Saini, V.; Marchese, A.; Majetschak, M. CXC chemokine receptor 4 is a cell surface receptor for extracellular ubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 15566–15576. [Google Scholar]
  111. Geissmann, F.; Cameron, T.O.; Sidobre, S.; Manlongat, N.; Kronenberg, M.; Briskin, M.J.; Dustin, M.L.; Littman, D.R. Intravascular immune surveillance by CXCR6+ NKT cells patrolling liver sinusoids. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e113. [Google Scholar]
  112. Germanov, E.; Veinotte, L.; Cullen, R.; Chamberlain, E.; Butcher, E.C.; Johnston, B. Critical role for the chemokine receptor CXCR6 in homeostasis and activation of CD1d-restricted NKT cells. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  113. Heydtmann, M.; Lalor, P.F.; Eksteen, J.A.; Hubscher, S.G.; Briskin, M.; Adams, D.H. CXC chemokine ligand 16 promotes integrin-mediated adhesion of liver-infiltrating lymphocytes to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes within the inflamed human liver. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar]
  114. Shields, P.L.; Morland, C.M.; Salmon, M.; Qin, S.; Hubscher, S.G.; Adams, D.H. Chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions provide a mechanism for selective T cell recruitment to specific liver compartments within hepatitis C-infected liver. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 6236–6243. [Google Scholar]
  115. Nguyen, N.; de Esch, C.; Cameron, B.; Kumar, R.K.; Zekry, A.; Lloyd, A.R. Positioning of leukocyte subsets in the portal and lobular compartments of HCV-infected liver correlates with local chemokine expression. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zeremski, M.; Petrovic, L.M.; Talal, A.H. The role of chemokines as inflammatory mediators in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Viral. Hepat. 2007, 14, 675–687. [Google Scholar]
  117. Lichterfeld, M.; Leifeld, L.; Nischalke, H.D.; Rockstroh, J.K.; Hess, L.; Sauerbruch, T.; Spengler, U. Reduced CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 1 and CCR5 surface expression on peripheral blood T lymphocytes from patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, 1803–1807. [Google Scholar]
  118. Apolinario, A.; Majano, P.L.; Lorente, R.; Nunez, O.; Clemente, G.; Garcia-Monzon, C. Gene expression profile of T-cell-specific chemokines in human hepatocyte-derived cells: Evidence for a synergistic inducer effect of cytokines and hepatitis C virus proteins. J. Viral. Hepat. 2005, 12, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  119. Sillanpaa, M.; Kaukinen, P.; Melen, K.; Julkunen, I. Hepatitis C virus proteins interfere with the activation of chemokine gene promoters and downregulate chemokine gene expression. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 432–443. [Google Scholar]
  120. Brenndorfer, E.D.; Brass, A.; Karthe, J.; Ahlen, G.; Bode, J.G.; Sallberg, M. Cleavage of the T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase by the hepatitis C virus nonstructural 3/4A protease induces a Th1 to Th2 shift reversible by ribavirin therapy. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 1671–80. [Google Scholar]
  121. Asselah, T.; Bieche, I.; Laurendeau, I.; Paradis, V.; Vidaud, D.; Degott, C.; Martinot, M.; Bedossa, P.; Valla, D.; Vidaud, M.; et al. Liver gene expression signature of mild fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis, C. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 2064–2075. [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhdanov, K.V.; Gusev, D.A.; Chirskii, V.S.; Sysoev, K.A.; Iakubovskaia, L.A.; Shakhmanov, D.M.; Totolian, A.A. Chronic HCV-infection and expression of mRNA of CC-chemokines and their receptors. Zhurnal Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2008, 2008, 73–78. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  123. Brenndorfer, E.D.; Weiland, M.; Frelin, L.; Derk, E.; Ahlen, G.; Jiao, J.; Bode, J.G.; Sallberg, M. Anti-tumor necrosis factor α treatment promotes apoptosis and prevents liver regeneration in a transgenic mouse model of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2010, 52, 1553–1563. [Google Scholar]
  124. Soo, H.M.; Garzino-Demo, A.; Hong, W.; Tan, Y.H.; Tan, Y.J.; Goh, P.; Lim, S.G.; Lim, S.P. Expression of a full-length hepatitis C virus cDNA up-regulates the expression of CC chemokines MCP-1 and RANTES. Virology 2002, 303, 253–277. [Google Scholar]
  125. Brenndorfer, E.D.; Brass, A.; Soderholm, J.; Frelin, L.; Aleman, S.; Bode, J.G.; Sallberg, M. Hepatitis C virus non-structural 3/4A protein interferes with intrahepatic interferon-γ production. Gut 2012, 61, 589–596. [Google Scholar]
  126. Riezu-Boj, J.I.; Larrea, E.; Aldabe, R.; Guembe, L.; Casares, N.; Galeano, E.; Echeverria, I.; Sarobe, P.; Herrero, I.; Sangro, B.; et al. Hepatitis C virus induces the expression of CCL17 and CCL22 chemokines that attract regulatory T cells to the site of infection. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 422–431. [Google Scholar]
  127. Gruener, N.H.; Lechner, F.; Jung, M.C.; Diepolder, H.; Gerlach, T.; Lauer, G.; Walker, B.; Sullivan, J.; Phillips, R.; Pape, G.R.; et al. Sustained dysfunction of antiviral CD8+ T lymphocytes after infection with hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5550–5558. [Google Scholar]
  128. Kaplanski, G.; Farnarier, C.; Payan, M.J.; Bongrand, P.; Durand, J.M. Increased levels of soluble adhesion molecules in the serum of patients with hepatitis C Correlation with cytokine concentrations and liver inflammation and fibrosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1997, 42, 2277–2284. [Google Scholar]
  129. Polyak, S.J.; Khabar, K.S.; Rezeiq, M.; Gretch, D.R. Elevated levels of interleukin-8 in serum are associated with hepatitis C virus infection and resistance to interferon therapy. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 6209–6211. [Google Scholar]
  130. Bataller, R.; Paik, Y.H.; Lindquist, J.N.; Lemasters, J.J.; Brenner, D.A. Hepatitis C virus core and nonstructural proteins induce fibrogenic effects in hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 529–540. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kadoya, H.; Nagano-Fujii, M.; Deng, L.; Nakazono, N.; Hotta, H. Nonstructural proteins 4A and 4B of hepatitis C virus transactivate the interleukin 8 promoter. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 49, 265–273. [Google Scholar]
  132. Zeremski, M.; Petrovic, L.M.; Chiriboga, L.; Brown, Q.B.; Yee, H.T.; Kinkhabwala, M.; Jacobson, I.M.; Dimova, R.; Markatou, M.; Talal, A.H. Intrahepatic levels of CXCR3-associated chemokines correlate with liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1440–1450. [Google Scholar]
  133. Helbig, K.J.; Ruszkiewicz, A.; Lanford, R.E.; Berzsenyi, M.D.; Harley, H.A.; McColl, S.R.; Beard, M.R. Differential expression of the CXCR3 ligands in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and their modulation by HCV in vitro. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 836–846. [Google Scholar]
  134. Larrubia, J.R.; Calvino, M.; Benito, S.; Sanz-de-Villalobos, E.; Perna, C.; Perez-Hornedo, J.; Gonzalez-Mateos, F.; Garcia-Garzon, S.; Bienvenido, A.; Parra, T. The role of CCR5/CXCR3 expressing CD8+ cells in liver damage and viral control during persistent hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2007, 47, 632–641. [Google Scholar]
  135. Kaukinen, P.; Sillanpaa, M.; Kotenko, S.; Lin, R.; Hiscott, J.; Melen, K.; Julkunen, I. Hepatitis C virus NS2 and NS3/4A proteins are potent inhibitors of host cell cytokine/chemokine gene expression. Virol. J. 2006, 3, 66. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zekri, A.R.; Bahnassy, A.A.; Mohamed, W.S.; Alam El-Din, H.M.; Shousha, H.I.; Zayed, N.; Eldahshan, D.H.; Abdel-Aziz, A.O. Dynamic interplay between CXCL levels in chronic hepatitis C patients treated by interferon. Virol. J. 2013, 10, 218. [Google Scholar]
  137. Brownell, J.; Wagoner, J.; Lovelace, E.S.; Thirstrup, D.; Mohar, I.; Smith, W.; Giugliano, S.; Li, K.; Crispe, I.N.; Rosen, H.R.; et al. Independent parallel pathways to CXCL10 induction in HCV-infected hepatocytes. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 701–708. [Google Scholar]
  138. Zeremski, M.; Hooker, G.; Shu, M.A.; Winkelstein, E.; Brown, Q.; des Jarlais, D.C.; Tobler, L.H.; Rehermann, B.; Busch, M.P.; Edlin, B.R.; et al. Induction of CXCR3- and CCR5-associated chemokines during acute hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 545–553. [Google Scholar]
  139. Harvey, C.E.; Post, J.J.; Palladinetti, P.; Freeman, A.J.; Ffrench, R.A.; Kumar, R.K.; Marinos, G.; Lloyd, A.R. Expression of the chemokine IP-10 (CXCL10) by hepatocytes in chronic hepatitis C virus infection correlates with histological severity and lobular inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003, 74, 360–369. [Google Scholar]
  140. Helbig, K.J.; George, J.; Beard, M.R. A novel I-TAC promoter polymorphic variant is functional in the presence of replicating HCV in vitro. J. Clin. Virol. 2005, 32, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  141. Spengler, U.; Nattermann, J. Immunopathogenesis in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Clin. Sci. 2007, 112, 141–155. [Google Scholar]
  142. Wang, J.; Holmes, T.H.; Cheung, R.; Greenberg, H.B.; He, X.S. Expression of chemokine receptors on intrahepatic and peripheral lymphocytes in chronic hepatitis C infection: Its relationship to liver inflammation. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 190, 989–997. [Google Scholar]
  143. Northfield, J.W.; Kasprowicz, V.; Lucas, M.; Kersting, N.; Bengsch, B.; Kim, A.; Phillips, R.E.; Walker, B.D.; Thimme, R.; Lauer, G.; et al. CD161 expression on hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells suggests a distinct pathway of T cell differentiation. Hepatology 2008, 47, 396–406. [Google Scholar]
  144. Apolinario, A.; Majano, P.L.; Alvarez-Perez, E.; Saez, A.; Lozano, C.; Vargas, J.; Garcia-Monzon, C. Increased expression of T cell chemokines and their receptors in chronic hepatitis C: Relationship with the histological activity of liver disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 2861–2870. [Google Scholar]
  145. Palmer, C.; Corpuz, T.; Guirguis, M.; O’Toole, S.; Yan, K.; Bu, Y.; Jorgenson, J.; Talbot, M.; Loi, K.; Lloyd, A.; et al. The effect of obesity on intrahepatic cytokine and chemokine expression in chronic hepatitis C infection. Gut 2010, 59, 397–404. [Google Scholar]
  146. Mihm, S.; Schweyer, S.; Ramadori, G. Expression of the chemokine IP-10 correlates with the accumulation of hepatic IFN-γ and IL-18 mRNA in chronic hepatitis C but not in hepatitis B. J. Med. Virol. 2003, 70, 562–570. [Google Scholar]
  147. Woitas, R.P.; Ahlenstiel, G.; Iwan, A.; Rockstroh, J.K.; Brackmann, H.H.; Kupfer, B.; Matz, B.; Offergeld, R.; Sauerbruch, T.; Spengler, U. Frequency of the HIV-protective CC chemokine receptor 5-Delta32/Delta32 genotype is increased in hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar]
  148. Brenndorfer, E.D.; Karthe, J.; Frelin, L.; Cebula, P.; Erhardt, A.; Schulte am Esch, J.; Hengel, H.; Bartenschlager, R.; Sallberg, M.; Haussinger, D.; et al. Nonstructural 3/4A protease of hepatitis C virus activates epithelial growth factor-induced signal transduction by cleavage of the T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar]
  149. Rahbin, N.; Frelin, L.; Aleman, S.; Hultcrantz, R.; Sallberg, M.; Brenndorfer, E.D. Non-structural 3 protein expression is associated with T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase and viral RNA levels in chronic hepatitis C patients. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 433, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  150. Shimoda, K.; Begum, N.A.; Shibuta, K.; Mori, M.; Bonkovsky, H.L.; Banner, B.F.; Barnard, G.F. Interleukin-8 and hIRH (SDF1-α/PBSF) mRNA expression and histological activity index in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1998, 28, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  151. Tsukada, S.; Parsons, C.J.; Rippe, R.A. Mechanisms of liver fibrosis. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 364, 33–60. [Google Scholar]
  152. Imamura, M.; Ogawa, T.; Sasaguri, Y.; Chayama, K.; Ueno, H. Suppression of macrophage infiltration inhibits activation of hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrogenesis in rats. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 138–146. [Google Scholar]
  153. Muhlbauer, M.; Bosserhoff, A.K.; Hartmann, A.; Thasler, W.E.; Weiss, T.S.; Herfarth, H.; Lock, G.; Scholmerich, J.; Hellerbrand, C. A novel MCP-1 gene polymorphism is associated with hepatic MCP-1 expression and severity of HCV-related liver disease. Gastroenterology 2003, 125, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar]
  154. Schwabe, R.F.; Bataller, R.; Brenner, D.A. Human hepatic stellate cells express CCR5 and RANTES to induce proliferation and migration. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003, 285, G949–G958. [Google Scholar]
  155. Seki, E.; De Minicis, S.; Gwak, G.Y.; Kluwe, J.; Inokuchi, S.; Bursill, C.A.; Llovet, J.M.; Brenner, D.A.; Schwabe, R.F. CCR1 and CCR5 promote hepatic fibrosis in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1858–1870. [Google Scholar]
  156. Radaeva, S.; Sun, R.; Jaruga, B.; Nguyen, V.T.; Tian, Z.; Gao, B. Natural killer cells ameliorate liver fibrosis by killing activated stellate cells in NKG2D-dependent and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-dependent manners. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 435–452. [Google Scholar]
  157. Kawarabayashi, N.; Seki, S.; Hatsuse, K.; Ohkawa, T.; Koike, Y.; Aihara, T.; Habu, Y.; Nakagawa, R.; Ami, K.; Hiraide, H.; et al. Decrease of CD56+ T cells and natural killer cells in cirrhotic livers with hepatitis C may be involved in their susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2000, 32, 962–969. [Google Scholar]
  158. Muhanna, N.; Doron, S.; Wald, O.; Horani, A.; Eid, A.; Pappo, O.; Friedman, S.L.; Safadi, R. Activation of hepatic stellate cells after phagocytosis of lymphocytes: A novel pathway of fibrogenesis. Hepatology 2008, 48, 963–977. [Google Scholar]
  159. Jeong, W.I.; Park, O.; Radaeva, S.; Gao, B. STAT1 inhibits liver fibrosis in mice by inhibiting stellate cell proliferation and stimulating NK cell cytotoxicity. Hepatology 2006, 44, 1441–1451. [Google Scholar]
  160. Wynn, T.A. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nat. Rev. 2004, 4, 583–594. [Google Scholar]
  161. Chew, V.; Chen, J.; Lee, D.; Loh, E.; Lee, J.; Lim, K.H.; Weber, A.; Slankamenac, K.; Poon, R.T.; Yang, H.; et al. Chemokine-driven lymphocyte infiltration: an early intratumoural event determining long-term survival in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2012, 61, 427–438. [Google Scholar]
  162. Fu, J.; Xu, D.; Liu, Z.; Shi, M.; Zhao, P.; Fu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, C.; et al. Increased regulatory T cells correlate with CD8 T-cell impairment and poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 2328–2339. [Google Scholar]
  163. Hoechst, B.; Ormandy, L.A.; Ballmaier, M.; Lehner, F.; Kruger, C.; Manns, M.P.; Greten, T.F.; Korangy, F. A new population of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma patients induces CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ T cells. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  164. Ajuebor, M.N.; Hogaboam, C.M.; Le, T.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Swain, M.G. CCL3/MIP-1α is pro-inflammatory in murine T cell-mediated hepatitis by recruiting CCR1-expressing CD4+ T cells to the liver. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 2907–2918. [Google Scholar]
  165. Ajuebor, M.N.; Wondimu, Z.; Hogaboam, C.M.; Le, T.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Swain, M.G. CCR5 deficiency drives enhanced natural killer cell trafficking to and activation within the liver in murine T cell-mediated hepatitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1975–1988. [Google Scholar]
  166. Moreno, C.; Gustot, T.; Nicaise, C.; Quertinmont, E.; Nagy, N.; Parmentier, M.; Le Moine, O.; Deviere, J.; Louis, H. CCR5 deficiency exacerbates T-cell-mediated hepatitis in mice. Hepatology 2005, 42, 854–862. [Google Scholar]
  167. Mitchell, C.; Couton, D.; Couty, J.P.; Anson, M.; Crain, A.M.; Bizet, V.; Renia, L.; Pol, S.; Mallet, V.; Gilgenkrantz, H. Dual role of CCR2 in the constitution and the resolution of liver fibrosis in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 1766–1775. [Google Scholar]
  168. Ishiwata, Y.; Yokochi, S.; Hashimoto, H.; Ninomiya, F.; Suzuki, T. Protection against concanavalin A-induced murine liver injury by the organic germanium compound propagermanium. Scand. J. Immunol. 1998, 48, 605–614. [Google Scholar]
  169. Yokochi, S.; Ishiwata, Y.; Hashimoto, H.; Ninomiya, F.; Suzuki, T. Hepatoprotective effect of propagermanium on Corynebacterium parvum and lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury in mice. Scand. J. Immunol. 1998, 48, 183–191. [Google Scholar]
  170. Hogaboam, C.M.; Bone-Larson, C.L.; Steinhauser, M.L.; Matsukawa, A.; Gosling, J.; Boring, L.; Charo, I.F.; Simpson, K.J.; Lukacs, N.W.; Kunkel, S.L. Exaggerated hepatic injury due to acetaminophen challenge in mice lacking C-C chemokine receptor 2. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar]
  171. Wiederholt, T.; von Westernhagen, M.; Zaldivar, M.M.; Berres, M.L.; Schmitz, P.; Hellerbrand, C.; Muller, T.; Berg, T.; Trautwein, C.; Wasmuth, H.E. Genetic variations of the chemokine scavenger receptor D6 are associated with liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis C. Hum. Immunol. 2008, 69, 861–866. [Google Scholar]
  172. Jaeschke, H.; Hasegawa, T. Role of neutrophils in acute inflammatory liver injury. Liver Int. 2006, 26, 912–919. [Google Scholar]
  173. Kuboki, S.; Shin, T.; Huber, N.; Eismann, T.; Galloway, E.; Schuster, R.; Blanchard, J.; Edwards, M.J.; Lentsch, A.B. Hepatocyte signaling through CXC chemokine receptor-2 is detrimental to liver recovery after ischemia/reperfusion in mice. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar]
  174. Bertini, R.; Allegretti, M.; Bizzarri, C.; Moriconi, A.; Locati, M.; Zampella, G.; Cervellera, M.N.; di Cioccio, V.; Cesta, M.C.; Galliera, E.; et al. Noncompetitive allosteric inhibitors of the inflammatory chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2: prevention of reperfusion injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11791–11796. [Google Scholar]
  175. Erhardt, A.; Wegscheid, C.; Claass, B.; Carambia, A.; Herkel, J.; Mittrucker, H.W.; Panzer, U.; Tiegs, G. CXCR3 deficiency exacerbates liver disease and abrogates tolerance in a mouse model of immune-mediated hepatitis. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5284–5293. [Google Scholar]
  176. Zaldivar, M.M.; Berres, M.L.; Sahin, H.; Nellen, A.; Heinrichs, D.; Schmitz, P.; Gassler, N.; Streetz, K.L.; Trautwein, C.; Wasmuth, H.E. The chemokine receptor CXCR3 limits injury after acute toxic liver damage. Lab. Investig. 2012, 92, 724–734. [Google Scholar]
  177. Zhai, Y.; Shen, X.D.; Hancock, W.W.; Gao, F.; Qiao, B.; Lassman, C.; Belperio, J.A.; Strieter, R.M.; Busuttil, R.W.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. CXCR3+ CD4+ T cells mediate innate immune function in the pathophysiology of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6313–6322. [Google Scholar]
  178. Ajuebor, M.N.; Jin, Y.; Gremillion, G.L.; Strieter, R.M.; Chen, Q.; Adegboyega, P.A. γδT cells initiate acute inflammation and injury in adenovirus-infected liver via cytokine-chemokine cross talk. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 9564–9576. [Google Scholar]
  179. Wehr, A.; Baeck, C.; Heymann, F.; Niemietz, P.M.; Hammerich, L.; Martin, C.; Zimmermann, H.W.; Pack, O.; Gassler, N.; Hittatiya, K.; et al. Chemokine receptor CXCR6-dependent hepatic NK T Cell accumulation promotes inflammation and liver fibrosis. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5226–5236. [Google Scholar]
  180. Xu, H.B.; Gong, Y.P.; Cheng, J.; Chu, Y.W.; Xiong, S.D. CXCL16 participates in pathogenesis of immunological liver injury by regulating T lymphocyte infiltration in liver tissue. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 4979–4985. [Google Scholar]
  181. Yang, S.J.; IglayReger, H.B.; Kadouh, H.C.; Bodary, P.F. Inhibition of the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2/chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 pathway attenuates hyperglycaemia and inflammation in a mouse model of hepatic steatosis and lipoatrophy. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 972–981. [Google Scholar]
  182. Tamura, Y.; Sugimoto, M.; Murayama, T.; Minami, M.; Nishikaze, Y.; Ariyasu, H.; Akamizu, T.; Kita, T.; Yokode, M.; Arai, H. C-C chemokine receptor 2 inhibitor improves diet-induced development of insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in mice. J. Ather. Thromb. 2010, 17, 219–228. [Google Scholar]
  183. Barashi, N.; Weiss, I.D.; Wald, O.; Wald, H.; Beider, K.; Abraham, M.; Klein, S.; Goldenberg, D.; Axelrod, J.; Pikarsky, E.; et al. Inflammation-induced hepatocellular carcinoma is dependent on CCR5 in mice. Hepatology 2013, 58, 1021–1030. [Google Scholar]
  184. Karlmark, K.R.; Weiskirchen, R.; Zimmermann, H.W.; Gassler, N.; Ginhoux, F.; Weber, C.; Merad, M.; Luedde, T.; Trautwein, C.; Tacke, F. Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology 2009, 50, 261–274. [Google Scholar]
  185. Seki, E.; de Minicis, S.; Inokuchi, S.; Taura, K.; Miyai, K.; van Rooijen, N.; Schwabe, R.F.; Brenner, D.A. CCR2 promotes hepatic fibrosis in mice. Hepatology 2009, 50, 185–197. [Google Scholar]
  186. Baeck, C.; Wehr, A.; Karlmark, K.R.; Heymann, F.; Vucur, M.; Gassler, N.; Huss, S.; Klussmann, S.; Eulberg, D.; Luedde, T.; et al. Pharmacological inhibition of the chemokine CCL2 (MCP-1) diminishes liver macrophage infiltration and steatohepatitis in chronic hepatic injury. Gut 2012, 61, 416–426. [Google Scholar]
  187. Stefanovic, L.; Brenner, D.A.; Stefanovic, B. Direct hepatotoxic effect of KC chemokine in the liver without infiltration of neutrophils. Exp. Biol. Med. 2005, 230, 573–586. [Google Scholar]
  188. Zimmermann, H.W.; Seidler, S.; Gassler, N.; Nattermann, J.; Luedde, T.; Trautwein, C.; Tacke, F. Interleukin-8 is activated in patients with chronic liver diseases and associated with hepatic macrophage accumulation in human liver fibrosis. PLoS One 2011, 6, e21381. [Google Scholar]
  189. Zaldivar, M.M.; Pauels, K.; von Hundelshausen, P.; Berres, M.L.; Schmitz, P.; Bornemann, J.; Kowalska, M.A.; Gassler, N.; Streetz, K.L.; Weiskirchen, R.; et al. CXC chemokine ligand 4 (Cxcl4) is a platelet-derived mediator of experimental liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2010, 51, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar]
  190. Hintermann, E.; Bayer, M.; Pfeilschifter, J.M.; Luster, A.D.; Christen, U. CXCL10 promotes liver fibrosis by prevention of NK cell mediated hepatic stellate cell inactivation. J. Autoimmun. 2010, 35, 424–435. [Google Scholar]
  191. Wasmuth, H.E.; Lammert, F.; Zaldivar, M.M.; Weiskirchen, R.; Hellerbrand, C.; Scholten, D.; Berres, M.L.; Zimmermann, H.; Streetz, K.L.; Tacke, F.; et al. Antifibrotic effects of CXCL9 and its receptor CXCR3 in livers of mice and humans. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 309–319. [Google Scholar]
  192. Ding, B.S.; Cao, Z.; Lis, R.; Nolan, D.J.; Guo, P.; Simons, M.; Penfold, M.E.; Shido, K.; Rabbany, S.Y.; Rafii, S. Divergent angiocrine signals from vascular niche balance liver regeneration and fibrosis. Nature 2014, 505, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  193. Yang, X.; Lu, P.; Fujii, C.; Nakamoto, Y.; Gao, J.L.; Kaneko, S.; Murphy, P.M.; Mukaida, N. Essential contribution of a chemokine CCL3 and its receptor CCR1 to hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 1869–1876. [Google Scholar]
  194. Kapanadze, T.; Gamrekelashvili, J.; Ma, C.; Chan, C.; Zhao, F.; Hewitt, S.; Zender, L.; Kapoor, V.; Felsher, D.W.; Manns, M.P.; et al. Regulation of accumulation and function of myeloid derived suppressor cells in different murine models of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2013, 59, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar]
  195. Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Reiberger, T.; Duyverman, A.M.; Huang, P.; Samuel, R.; Hiddingh, L.; Roberge, S.; Koppel, C.; Lauwers, G.Y.; et al. Differential effects of sorafenib on liver versus tumor fibrosis mediated by SDF1α/CXCR4 axis and Gr-1+ myeloid cell infiltration in mice. Hepatology 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Zheng, K.; Li, H.Y.; Su, X.L.; Wang, X.Y.; Tian, T.; Li, F.; Ren, G.S. Chemokine receptor CXCR7 regulates the invasion angiogenesis and tumor growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 29, 31. [Google Scholar]
  197. Fatkenheuer, G.; Pozniak, A.L.; Johnson, M.A.; Plettenberg, A.; Staszewski, S.; Hoepelman, A.I.; Saag, M.S.; Goebel, F.D.; Rockstroh, J.K.; Dezube, B.J.; et al. Efficacy of short-term monotherapy with maraviroc a new CCR5 antagonist in patients infected with HIV-1. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 1170–1172. [Google Scholar]
  198. Ramos, C.D.; Canetti, C.; Souto, J.T.; Silva, J.S.; Hogaboam, C.M.; Ferreira, S.H.; Cunha, F.Q. MIP-1α [CCL3] acting on the CCR1 receptor mediates neutrophil migration in immune inflammation via sequential release of TNF-α and LTB4. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 167–177. [Google Scholar]
  199. Bonecchi, R.; Polentarutti, N.; Luini, W.; Borsatti, A.; Bernasconi, S.; Locati, M.; Power, C.; Proudfoot, A.; Wells, T.N.; Mackay, C.; et al. Up-regulation of CCR1 and CCR3 and induction of chemotaxis to CC chemokines by IFN-γ in human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 474–479. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 15 04747f1 1024
Figure 1. Recruitment of innate immune cells to the site of infection in the liver. Type I IFN released by hepatocytes upon pathogen recognition activates KCs, which secrete CCL2 and IL-12. CCL2 recruits macrophages, the main source of CCL3. NK cells recruited by CCL3 and activated by IL-12 release IFN-γ, that induces secretion of CXCL9 by LSECs and hepatocytes. CXCL9 and CCL3 attract Th1 and CD8+ T cells to the site of infection. DCs (not shown) are recruited by their CCR1/5 receptor and secrete amongst others CCL4 and CCL5. Neutrophils (not shown) are recruited by IL-1 or TNF-α-induced CXCL8 secretion from, e.g., KCs and enhance immune cell recruitment by secretion of CCL2, CXCL8, CXCL9 and CXCL10.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Recruitment of innate immune cells to the site of infection in the liver. Type I IFN released by hepatocytes upon pathogen recognition activates KCs, which secrete CCL2 and IL-12. CCL2 recruits macrophages, the main source of CCL3. NK cells recruited by CCL3 and activated by IL-12 release IFN-γ, that induces secretion of CXCL9 by LSECs and hepatocytes. CXCL9 and CCL3 attract Th1 and CD8+ T cells to the site of infection. DCs (not shown) are recruited by their CCR1/5 receptor and secrete amongst others CCL4 and CCL5. Neutrophils (not shown) are recruited by IL-1 or TNF-α-induced CXCL8 secretion from, e.g., KCs and enhance immune cell recruitment by secretion of CCL2, CXCL8, CXCL9 and CXCL10.
Ijms 15 04747f1 1024
Ijms 15 04747f2 1024
Figure 2. Modulation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) during chronic hepatitis C. HSCs are involved in chronic hepatitis C by recruiting immune cells through the secretion of chemokines such as CCL2, CCL5, CXCL9 and CXCL10. KCs contribute to HSC activation by producing CCL2, CCL3, CCL5 and TGF-β, T cells by producing TGF-β and LSECs by secreting CXCL12. CXCL9 produced by hepatocytes and LSECs and IFN-γ produced by NK and T cells are antifibrogenic. In addition, NK cells are antifibrogenic by expressing NKG2D and TRAIL. Activated HSCs proliferate (induced, e.g., by PDGF) and produce collagen (induced e.g., by IL-4, IL-13 and TGF-β) resulting in liver fibrosis.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Modulation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) during chronic hepatitis C. HSCs are involved in chronic hepatitis C by recruiting immune cells through the secretion of chemokines such as CCL2, CCL5, CXCL9 and CXCL10. KCs contribute to HSC activation by producing CCL2, CCL3, CCL5 and TGF-β, T cells by producing TGF-β and LSECs by secreting CXCL12. CXCL9 produced by hepatocytes and LSECs and IFN-γ produced by NK and T cells are antifibrogenic. In addition, NK cells are antifibrogenic by expressing NKG2D and TRAIL. Activated HSCs proliferate (induced, e.g., by PDGF) and produce collagen (induced e.g., by IL-4, IL-13 and TGF-β) resulting in liver fibrosis.
Ijms 15 04747f2 1024
Table Table 1. Summary of the chemokine receptors and their ligands important in intra-hepatic immunity.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Summary of the chemokine receptors and their ligands important in intra-hepatic immunity.
Chemokine receptorExpression onLigandsSecretion byFunctionReferences
CCR1immature DCs, monocytes, memory T cells, NK cellsCCL3, CCL5infiltrating macrophages, KCs, DCs, activated HSCs, LSECsrecruitment of NK cells, immature DCs[38,5871]
CCR2monocytes, memory T cells, pDCsCCL2, CCL7, CCL8, CCL13KCs, activated HSCsrecruitment of monocytes[48,58,61,63,66,67,70, 7277]
CCR4Th2 cells, TregsCCL17, CCL22DCs, macrophages, monocytesrecruitment of Th2 cells, Tregs[38,7883]
CCR5immature DCs, Th1 cells, NK cells, monocytes, pDCs, HSCsCCL3, CCL4, CCL5,infiltrating macrophages, KCs, DCs, activated HSCs, LSECsrecruitment of NK cells, immature DCs, effector T cells[38,5871]
CXCR1neutrophils, monocytes, mast cells, hepatocytesCXCL6, CXCL7, CXCL8,LSECs, KCs, activated hepatocytes, Th1 cells, Th17 cellsrecruitment of neutrophils[58,60,8495]
CXCR2neutrophils, monocytes, mast cellsCXCL1-3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, CXCL8LSECs, KCs, activated hepatocytes, Th1 cells, Th17 cellsrecruitment of neutrophils[58,60,84,8795]
CXCR3CD8 T cells, Th1 cells, NK cells, NKT cells, Tregs, HSCs, mast cellsCXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11,hepatocytes, LSECs, HSCs, KCs, DCs, neutrophilsrecruitment of NK, NKT and T cells[5861,96101]
CXCR3-Bmicrovascular endothelial cells, activated T cellsCXCL4, CXCL9/10/11plateletsmediation of angiostatic effects[46,102,103]
CXCR4widely expressed, HSCsCXCL12activated HSCsneoangiogenesisand HSC activation[104110]
CXCR6Th1 T cells, CD8 T cells, NKT cells, NK cellsCXCL16LSECs, hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, activated DCsrecruitment and retention of effector cells in the liver[111113]
Table Table 2. Summary of the HCV-mediated changes in the expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors mentioned in this review.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Summary of the HCV-mediated changes in the expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors mentioned in this review.
Chemokine receptorLigandsChanges in HCV infectionReferences
CCR1CCL3, CCL5, CCL7, CCL8, CCL13-16, CCL23Increased intrahepatic CCL3 and 5 expression during chronic hepatitis C[116]
Decreased proportion of CCR1+ CD8+ T cells in chronic hepatitis C patients[117]
Increase of CCL5 expression by HCV core and NS5A in vitro, but decrease by NS3/4A[118,119]
Decrease of the intrahepatic level of CCL3 by NS3/4A in vivo[120]
CCR2CCL2, CCL7, CCL8, CCL13Increased expression of CCL2 and CCR2 in HCV-infected patients[121,122]
Increase of CCL2 expression by HCV NS3/4A and NS5A[123,124]
CCR4CCL17, CCL22Enhanced expression of CCL17 and CCL22 in chronic hepatitis C patients[125,126]
Increased intrahepatic levels of CCL17 and CCL22 through liver-specific HCV NS3/4A expression[125]
CCR5CCL3-5, CCL8High frequency of CCR5+ T cells during acute HCV infection[127]
Increased CCL3, 4 and 5 expression during chronic hepatitis C[116]
Decreased proportion of CCR5+ CD8+ T cells in chronic hepatitis C patients[117]
Increase of CCL5 expression by HCV core and NS5A in vitro, but decrease by NS3/4A[118,119]
Decrease of the intrahepatic level of CCL3 by NS3/4A in vivo[120]
CXCR1/2CXCL6-8 (for CXCR1) and CXCL1-8 (for CXCR2)Increased levels of CXCL8 in HCV-infected patients[128,129]
Induction of CXCL8 expression by HCV core, NS4A, NS4B and NS5B, but decrease by NS3/4A[119,130,131]
CXCR3CXCL4, CXCL9-11Increased intrahepatic CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 levels during chronic hepatitis C[132]
Increased intrahepatic CXCL10 and CXCL11 levels in HCV-infected chimpanzees[133]
High frequency of CXCR3+ CD8+ T cells during chronic HCV infection[132,134]
Decrease of the intrahepatic levels of CXCL9 and 11 by NS3/4A in vivo[125]
Reduction of CXCL10 expression by NS3/4A in vitro[135]
CXCR6CXCL16Increase in CXCL16 levels during IFN therapy[136]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert