- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(1), 203-217; doi:10.3390/ijms15010203
Abstract: A gene encoding Rhizopus oryzae lipase containing prosequence (ProROL) was cloned into the pPICZαA and electrotransformed into the Pichia pastoris X-33 strain. The lipase was functionally expressed and secreted in Pichia pastoris with a molecular weight of 35 kDa. The maximum lipase activity of recombinant lipase (rProROL) was 21,000 U/mL, which was obtained in a fed-batch cultivation after 168 h induction with methanol in a 50-L bioreactor. After fermentation, the supernatant was concentrated by ultrafiltration with a 10 kDa cut off membrane and purified with ion exchange chromatography using SP Sepharose Fast Flow chromatography. The optimum pH and temperature of the rProROL were pH 9.0 and 40 °C, respectively. The lipase was stable from pH 4.0 to 9.0 and from 25 to 55 °C. The enzyme activity was enhanced by Ca2+ and inhibited by Hg2+ and Ag+. The lipase showed high activity toward triglyceride-Tripalmitin (C16:0) and triglyceride-Trilaurin (C12:0).
Lipases (EC 184.108.40.206) are a class of hydrolases that catalyze a variety of reactions, such as the hydrolysis of fatty acid ester, trans-esterification, and ester synthesis at the interface between the insoluble substrate and water . Microbial lipases are currently receiving much attention because of their biotechnological potential, such as broad substrate specificity, high yield and low cost production and so on. Therefore, they have been widely used in industrial applications, such as biodiesel production, organic synthesis, food, pharmaceutical, and detergents [2,3].
It has been known for many years that the fungus Rhizopus oryzae produces extracellular lipase. Lipase from Rhizopus oryzae has wide applications in industries, such as esterification of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and biodiesel fuel production [4,5]. The native structure of Rhizopus oryzae Lipase (ROL) comprises a signal sequence of 26 amino acids, a prosequence of 97 amino acids and a mature lipase region of 269 amino acids (mROL) [6–8]. The prosequences are usually located between a signal peptide and a functional region of the protein. They often function as intramolecular chaperones that help folding of the functional region of the protein. Yang et al. reported that the prosequence of ROL is involved in the correct folding and efficient secretion of mROL . Although prosequence of ROL aids folding of mROL, to our knowledge, it is still unknown how the prosequence contributes to folding, post-translational processing and maturation of mROL in Rhizopus oryzae.
Until now, ProROL (ROL without a signal sequence of 26 amino acids) has already been expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae). In E. coli, ProROL could be efficiently produced in high yield at high specific activity (166 U/mL) . However, this expression system has the bottleneck that a cell disruption process is necessary, when compared with other expression systems in which the enzyme is secreted in the culture broth. In S. cerevisiae, ProROL could be secreted in the culture broth, but the activity of ProROL was very low (extracellular lipase activity reached only 2.88 U/mL at 120 h of cultivation in Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose (YPD) medium .
Compared with the E. coli and S. cerevisiae, the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) has many advantages as a host for production of recombinant heterologous proteins, such as high cell density, high levels of productivity, ease of genetic manipulation, the ability to perform complex post-translational modifications and very low secretion levels of endogenous proteins . Several lipases have been expressed successfully in P. pastoris, such as Candida albicans, Aspergillus tamari, Yarrowia lipolytica and Aspergillus niger [13–16]. Until now, there are no reports about high-level expression of ProROL in P. pastoris in bioreactor. In this article we describe the high-level expression of the ProROL in P. pastoris in a 50-L bioreactor, with the aim of allowing the production of high amounts of the relevant enzyme. The purification and characterization of the recombinant ProROL (rProROL) was also investigated.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Selection of Lipase Producing Clones
One hundred randomly picked zeocin resistant positive clones on the solid selective medium (YPDS containing zeocin) were transferred on YPD-rhodamine B-olive oil medium plates to check lipase expression level. Lipase expression was induced by adding 0.2 mL of methanol onto the lid covering the plates. Ten colonies that had larger halos were selected and cultivated in shaking flask. In shaking flask, the lipase activity increased gradually and reached the highest activity after 168 h of cultivation (supplementary information Figure S1). After 168 h of cultivation under inducing conditions, the lipase activity of the supernatant from different clones varied between 450 and 780 U/mL. A clone showed the highest lipase activity of 780 U/mL in shaking flask culture and this was chosen for all further experiments.
2.2. High Cell Density Fermentation for Production of Recombinant Lipase
The fed-batch fermentation continued for a period of 8 days. After 24 h batch culture when biomass reached 80 g/L dry cell weight, glycerol was exhausted and the cells were then induced with methanol. Upon methanol induction, the lipase activity in the supernatant reached a maximum of 21,000 U/mL, after 168 h induction with a dry cell weight of 197 g/L (Figure 1). Compared with the shaking flasks procedure, the high cell density fed batch of P. pastoris produced a significantly higher level of the recombinant enzyme. Under these conditions, a 27-fold increase in the volumetric lipase activity was obtained when scaling from shaking flasks to bioreactor (780 and 21,000 U/mL, respectively). In E. coli, the activity of rProROL could reach 166 U/mL (pNPB assay) in 100 mL Luria-Bertani medium . Compared with the expression of ProROL in E. coli, the expression of ProROL in P. pastoris has many advantages such as extracellular production of active rProROL, high level production of rProROL. In S. cerevisiae the activity of rProROL could reach 2.88 U/mL (pH-stat assay) after 120 h of cultivation in 200 mL YPD medium, which was much lower than that of the rProROL in this study . Until now, several Rhizopus lipases have also been successfully expressed in P. pastoris. The R. arrhizus lipase  and R. chinensis lipase  were functionally expressed and secreted in the P. pastoris, the enzyme activity of which reached 315 and 586 U/mL, which were lower than the expression level of the rProROL in this study. However, these values are not fully comparable since different cultivation conditions and activity assays with different substrates and conditions have been used. It is well known that the lipolytic activity test largely depends on a variety of factors, e.g., the type of substrate, the substrate’s interfacial area that is available for the enzyme, as well as the equipment used .
2.3. Purification of Recombinant Lipase
One hundred milliliters of the supernatant was ultrafiltrated through 10 kDa membrane, yielding 20 mL of concentrated lipase solution with a 94% yield and a 1.2-fold increased specific activity of 2267 U/mg. After anion exchange chromatography, a specific lipase activity of 6690 U/mg with a 3.02-fold increased was obtained (Table 1). The purified rProROL showed a single band on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Figure 2). The molecular weight of rProROL was 35 kDa, which is similar to the size of the recombinant Pro28ROL derived from S. cerevisiae .
2.4. Biochemical Characteristics of Recombinant Lipase
2.4.1. Effect of pH and Temperature
The influence of pH and temperature on the enzyme activity and stability is presented in Figures 3 and 4. As shown in Figure 3, the enzyme showed maximum activity at pH 9, the lipase activity decreased dramatically when pH was above 9 or below 8. Optimum pH for rProROL is similar to that for lipases from R. chinensis which showed maximum activity at pH 8.5 and was stable over a narrow pH range of 7.5–8.5 . As shown in Figure 3, the rProROL could maintain more than 75% of maximum activity after incubating at a pH range of 4–9 at 30 °C for 24 h. The pH stability of rProROL is comparable to the lipase from Ralstonia which could maintain more than 60% of maximum activity after incubating at a pH range of 5–10 at 4 °C for 24 h . As shown in Figure 4, the recombinant lipase showed an optimum activity at 40 °C and activity dropped sharply above 50 °C with no activity remaining at 70 °C. The optimum temperature of rProROL is similar to that of the prolipase from R. chinensis which exhibited maximum activity at 40 °C . Thermostability was examined by incubating rProROL at different temperatures for 1 h, and the residual activity was measured at 40 °C under the conditions mentioned above. The activity of rProROL was almost not affected by a temperature below 40 °C, but it decreased dramatically when the temperature was above 55 °C. rProROL showed 60% residual activity after 1 h incubation at 55 °C. Thermal stability of rProROL was higher than mROL which showed no residual activity remained after 30 min incubation at 55 °C .
2.4.2. Effect of Metal Ions on Lipase
Effect of different metal ions on the activity of the lipase is presented in Table 2. The lipase activity was slightly enhanced by Mg2+, K+ and Na+. Metal ion Ca2+ increased the activity of rProROL by 11%. The activity enhancement caused by Ca2+ and inhibition caused by and Zn2+ of rProROL was almost similar to those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LX1 lipase (Ca2+ increased P. aeruginosa LX1 lipase activity by 21% and Zn2+ reduced the lipase activity to 13.8%) and Galactomyces geotrichum Y05 lipase (Ca2+ increased G. geotrichum Y05 lipase activity by 14% and Zn2+ reduced the lipase activity to 57%) [20,21]. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that Ca2+ form complexes with ionized fatty acids which facilitated the removal of free fatty acids formed in the reaction at the fat–water interface and changing their stability and behaviors at the interfaces . The activity could maintain more than 80% of the control value in the presence of Li+, Co2+, Mn2+, Cu2+. The enzyme activity was strongly inhibited by Hg2+ and Ag+, suggesting that Hg2+ and Ag+ were able to alter the enzyme conformation. In agreement with our results, Yan et al.  and Sharon et al.  also found Hg2+ and Ag+ had a strong inhibitory effect on lipase activity. The metal-chelating agent EDTA did not affect the activity of rProROL.
2.4.3. Effect of Detergents on Lipase
For use in laundry detergents, lipase needs to be resistant to surfactants. Non-ionic detergent Triton X-100 increased slightly the enzyme activity to 104%, after 6 h at 25 °C. However, the activity was inhibited by other anionic detergent Tween-20 and Tween-80 which reduced rProROL activity to 76% and 71%, respectively. The activity remained almost stable in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol. Anionic detergent SDS had strong inhibitory effect on lipase activity, which reduced rProROL activity to only 7%. In accordance to our results, Cheng et al.  also found a great loss of activity in the presence of SDS but an enhanced activity in the presence of TritionX-100.
2.4.4. Effect of Organic Solvents
The stability of ProROL in the presence of various organic solvents is presented in Table 3. In this work, there was little effect of glycerol on rProROL. On the contrary, methanol, isopropanol, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and butanol decreased enzyme activity to 5%–61%, probably because they provoked a rapid protein denaturation. The enzyme stability was also evaluated in the presence of various concentrations of methanol and ethanol (Table 4). After 6 h incubation, the residual enzyme activity of rProROL in 20% ethanol and 10% ethanol were 81% and 88%, respectively. This tendency was found to be even better in the presence of methanol; the residual enzyme activity of rProROL in 20% methanol and 10% methanol were 91% and 97%, respectively. However, the lipase activity decreased dramatically when ethanol and methanol concentrations were increased up to 30%. Yang et al. reported that lipases from Pseudomonas cepacia, Candida rugosa and Candida antarctica were inactivated by 10% methanol in 30 min incubation ; therefore, rProROL seems to possess better methanol tolerance than these lipases.
2.4.5. Substrate Specificity
The substrate preferences of rProROL were characterized with various triglycerides, fatty acid methyl esters and oil. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 5, relative activity on each substrate is expressed as the percentage of that on olive oil. For triglycerides, the lipase showed high activity towards saturated triglyceride-Tripalmitin (C16:0) and triglyceride-Trilaurin (C12:0). For fatty acid methyl ester, the lipase preferred long-chain fatty acid esters (C12, C16, C18). Similar substrate specificity towards triglycerides was reported for Rhizopus delemar lipase . As shown in Figure 5, rProROL showed relative high activity on various emulsified oils (from 51% to 245%), especially on palm oil. The broad hydrolysis spectrum of various oil sources indicates that this recombinant lipase may play a significant part in the production of biodiesel .
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Strains, Plasmids and Materials
Rhizopus oryzae 3005 was purchased from the China Center of Industrial Culture Collection (Beijing, China). The E. coli strain Top 10 is routinely conserved in our laboratory. Pichia pastoris X-33, the expression vector pPICZαA and zeocin were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Restriction enzymes, T4-DNA ligase and Pfu DNA polymerase were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Shanghai Generay Company (Shanghai, China). The different lipase substrates were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
3.2. Vector Construction
The ProROL gene (GenBank Accession No. AF229435), was amplified by polymerase chain reaction methodology using genome DNA from R. oryzae as a template. The amplification primers containing the restriction sites for EcoRI and XbaI were designed as: PrF, 5′-CAGCGAATTCGTTCCTGTTTCTGGTAAATCTGG-3′ and PrR, 5′-GACGTCTAGATTACAAACAGCTTCCTTCGTT-3′. The PCR product were double digested with EcoRI (Sangon Biotech) and XbaI (Sangon Biotech), and then ligated into pPICZαA, forming pPICZαA-ProROL. Finally, the recombinant expressing vector pPICZαA-ProROL was used to transform E. coli Top 10. Through DNA sequencing, pPICZαA-ProROL was confirmed to contain the ProROL gene.
3.3. Transformation and Selection of P. pastoris Clones
P. pastoris X-33 was transformed with 10 μg of SacI-linearized pPICZαA-ProROL vector by electro-transformation, according to Invitrogen’s recommendations. Transformants were plated on YPDS plates (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone, 20 g/L dextrose, 20 g/L agar, and 1 M sorbitol) containing 100 μg/mL Zeocin to isolate resistant clones. Then the Zeocin-resistant clones were shifted to YPD-rhodamine B-olive oil medium plates containing 0.08 g/L rhodamine B and 1% (v/v) emulsified olive oil. Transformed colonies were confirmed by both PCR and sequencing.
3.4. Shaking Flask Cultures
Thirty clones from the YPD-rhodamine B-olive oil medium plates were selected according to the size of the halos that formed around the colonies. The seeds were incubated in 10 mL of Buffered Glycerol-complex Medium (BMGY) [yeast extract 1% (w/v), peptone 2% (w/v), 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer at pH 6.0, yeast nitrogen base with no amino acids 1.34% (w/v), glycerol 1% (w/v), biotin 0.04% (w/v)] in a 100 mL shake flask and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm until the culture reached OD600 = 2.0–6.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 50 mL Buffered Methanol-complex Medium (BMMY) (containing 0.5% methanol instead of glycerol as the sole carbon source) and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm. The methanol induction temperature was set at 30 °C, and 0.7% (v/v) methanol was fed at 24-h intervals for 5 days. The activities of the lipase were checked at 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 and 168 h. The colony with the highest activity was selected as the strain to ferment in the 50-L bioreactor.
3.5. High Cell Density Fermentation
The transformed strain showing the highest lipase activity in shake-flask culture was cultivated in high cell density fermentor. High cell density fermentation was carried out in 50-L bioreactor (Baoxing Co., Shanghai, China). Inoculum was cultured in BMGY medium. Cells were grown for 18–20 h a 30 °C on shaker of 200 rpm. Then, 10% (v/v) of the inoculum was inoculated into the 50-L bioreactor containing 20 L basal salt medium made of 0.47 g/L CaSO4·2H2O, 9.1 g/L K2SO4, 7.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 6.2 g/L KOH, 13.35 mL/L H3PO4 (85%), 20.0 g/L glycerol and 1.5 mL Pichia trace metal 1 (PTM1) (Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory, Guangzhou, China). One liter PTM1 consists of 6 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.08 g NaI, 3 g MnSO4·H2O, 0.5 g CoCl2, 20 g ZnCl2, 0.02 g H3BO3, 0.2 g Na2MoO4·2H2O, 65 g FeSO4·7H2O, 0.2 g biotin and 30 mL 6 N H2SO4. The temperature was controlled at 30 °C and the pH was maintained at 5.0 using NH4OH (28%) and H3PO4 (10%). The agitation rate was set at 500 rpm and the aeration rate was 40 L/min. When glycerol was used up, as indicated by an increased in dissolved oxygen (DO), 0.5% (v/v) methanol was added to induce expression the lipase. Feeding of methanol was linked to the dissolved oxygen (DO). When the initial methanol 0.5% (v/v) was depleted (indicated by an abrupt increase in DO), 80 g of 100% methanol solution containing of 1.2% (v/v) PTM1 was added automatically. The concentration of methanol was kept stable by monitoring the dissolved oxygen (OD) content and maintaining it at greater than 20%. The lipase activity of the supernatant and dry cell weight were monitored throughout the cultivation.
3.6. Biomass Analysis
Cell density was expressed as grams of dry cell weigh (DCW) per liter of broth, and was obtained by centrifuging 10 mL samples in a pre-weighted centrifuge tube at 8000 g for 10 min and washing twice with deionized water, then allowing the pellet to dry at 100 °C to constant weight.
3.7. Assay of Lipase Activity and Total Protein Concentration
The lipase activity in the culture filtrate was measured using olive oil as substrate. Ten percent (v/v) olive oil was emulsified in distilled water containing 2% (w/v) gum arabic as stabilizer using a homogenizer (Ultrtaturrax T25, Janke and Kunkel, IKA, Staufen, Germany) for 10 min at maximum speed. Twenty milliliters of substrate solution were heated to 40 °C and adjusted to pH 8.0. After addition of 5–20 μL of the enzyme solution, the activity was measured with a pH-stat (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). Liberated fatty acids were titrated automatically with 0.01 N NaOH to maintain the pH constant at 8.0. One unit (U) of lipase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberates 1 μmol fatty acid per minute under assay conditions. The protein content was determined according to the Bradford method using BSA as standard.
3.8. Purification of Lipase
After fermentation, cells from the cultures were removed by centrifuging at 10,000× g for 15 min. The supernatant was concentrated by ultrafiltration using a Millipore (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) set up according to the manufacturer’s instructions with a membrane of 10 kDa cut off, and subsequently dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (PBS; pH 6.0) at 4 °C overnight. For further purification, the enzyme solution was loaded onto an SP Sepharose Fast Flow column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) (2.0 cm × 20 cm) equilibrated with 0.02 M PBS. Elution was performed with a linear gradient of 0–0.5 M NaCl at a rate of 2 mL/min. The active fractions were pooled, and the purity of lipase was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Sangon Biotech).
3.9. Biochemical Characteristics of Recombinant Lipase
3.9.1. Effect of pH and Temperature on Enzyme Activity and Stability
The activity of the lipase at different temperature and pH was measured by pH-stat assay using olive oil as the substrate. The effect of temperature on lipase stability was determined by incubating lipase solutions for 1 h in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), at different temperatures. Residual enzyme activity was measured by pH-stat assy. For the pH stability, the enzyme was incubated at 30 °C in 50 mM acetic acid-sodium acetic acid buffer (pH 3.0–5.0), 50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 6.0–7.0), 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0–9.0), NaHCO3 buffer (pH 10.0–11.0). After 24 h of incubation, the residual activity was determined as described previously.
3.9.2. Effect of Metal Ions on Lipase Activity
The effect of metal ions on lipase activity was analyzed by incubating enzyme samples for 6 h at room temperature in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), containing 1 mM of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Li+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Hg2+, Ag+ and Fe3+. The residual activity was determined as described previously.
3.9.3. Effect of Detergents on Lipase Activity
The effect of detergents on lipase activity was analyzed by incubating enzyme samples for 6 h at room temperature in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), containing 1% (v/v) of the detergents (Triton X-100, Tween-80, Tween-20 and SDS) (Sangon Biotech). The residual activity was determined as described previously.
3.9.4. Effect of Organic Solvents on Lipase
The effect of organic solvents on enzyme activity was determined by measuring residual activity after pre-incubation of 2 mL enzyme solution for 6 h at room temperature, in 2 mL of methanol, ethanol, acetone, isopropanol, glycerol, butanol, chloroform and hexane ether, respectively. Besides this, enzyme stability in various concentrations of methanol and ethanol were evaluated since enzyme stability in these solvents is highly desirable for the enzymatic biodiesel production.
3.9.5. Substrate Specificity
For the determination of substrate specificity, 10% (v/v) triglycerides, including tributyrin, tricaprylin, trilaurin, tripalmitin, tristearin, olive oil and fatty acid methyl esters, including methyl butyrate, methyl caprylin, methyl laurate, methyl palmitate, methyl stearate were used as substrates with 2% (w/v) gum arabic as stabilizer in the pH-stat assay. Meanwhile, the activity of rProROL against a series of vegetable oils was determined in a similar manner.
In this study, ProROL was functionally expressed and secreted in P. pastoris. To our knowledge, this is the first report of heterologous high-level expression and characterization of ProROL in P. pastoris. The maximum lipase activity of rProROL was 21,000 U/mL, which was obtained in a fed-batch cultivation in 50-L bioreactor. Compared with the expression of ProROL in E. coli, the expression of ProROL in P. pastoris has many advantages, such as high levels of productivity (in P. pastoris, the activity of rProROL could reach 21,000 U/mL, while in E. coli, the activity of rProROL is only about 166 U/mL), the rProROL is in the supernatant, and cell disruption is not necessary. Compared with the expression of ProROL in S. cerevisiae, the expression of ProROL in P. pastoris has high levels of productivity (in S. cerevisiae the activity of rProROL could reach only 2.88 U/mL, after 120 h of cultivation in 200 mL YPD medium), and the P. pastoris was found to be more suitable for high-density fermentation than S. cerevisiae. The optimum pH and temperature of the rProROL were pH 9.0 and 40 °C, respectively. The lipase was stable from pH 4.0 to 9.0 and from 25 to 55 °C. Metal ion Ca2+ increased the activity of rProROL by 11%. The activity of lipase increased slightly in the presence of Mg2+, K+, Na+ and Triton X-100. Tween-80, Tween-20 and SDS decreased lipase activity. The lipase showed high activity toward long-chain fatty acid methyl esters (C12–C16).
This work was supported by the Key Science and Technology Program of Zhuhai (2012D0201990042).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Jaeger, K.E.; Eggert, T. Lipases for biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 2002, 13, 390–397. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, R.; Gupta, N.; Rathi, P. Bacterial lipases: An overview of production, purification and biochemical properties. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2004, 64, 763–781. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.K.; Mukhopadhyay, M. Overview of fungal lipase: A review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol 2012, 166, 486–520. [Google Scholar]
- Hama, S.; Yamaji, H.; Fukumizu, T.; Numata, T.; Tamalampudi, S.; Kondo, A.; Noda, H.; Fukuda, H. Biodiesel-fuel production in a packed-bed reactor using lipase-producing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within biomass support particles. Biochem. Eng. J 2007, 34, 273–278. [Google Scholar]
- Kaieda, M.; Samukawa, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Ban, K.; Kondo, A.; Shimada, Y.; Noda, H.; Nomoto, F.; Ohtsuka, K.; Izumoto, E.; et al. Biodiesel fuel production from plant oil catalyzed by Rhizopus oryzae lipase in a water-containing system without an organic solvent. J. Biosci. Bioeng 1999, 88, 627–631. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, W.N.; Li, Z.P.; Tan, T. Secretion of pro-and mature Rhizopus arrhizus lipases by Pichia pastoris and properties of the proteins. Mol. Biotechnol 2006, 32, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Beer, H.D.; Wohlfahrt, G.; Schmid, R.D.; McCarthy, J.E.G. The folding and activity of the extracellular lipase of Rhizopus oryzae are modulated by a prosequence. Biochem. J 1996, 319, 351–359. [Google Scholar]
- Beer, H.D.; McCarthy, J.E.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Schmid, R.D. Cloning, expression, characterization and role of the leader sequence of a lipase from Rhizopus oryzae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1399, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Yan, X.; Huang, R.; Zhang, B. Codon optimization, expression and enzymatic comparison of Rhizopus oryzae lipases pro-ROL and m-ROL in Pichia pastoris. Chin. J. Biotech 2011, 27, 1780–1788. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Hidalgo, A.; Haas, M.; Bornscheuer, U.T. Heterologous production of functional forms of Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2005, 71, 8974–8977. [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi, S.; Ueda, M.; Atomi, H.; Beer, H.D.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Schmid, R.D.; Tanaka, A. Extracellular production of active Rhizopus oryzae lipase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ferment. Bioeng 1998, 86, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
- Macauley, S.; Fazenda, M.L.; McNeil, B.; Harvey, L.M. Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastor is expression system. Yeast 2005, 22, 249–270. [Google Scholar]
- Lan, D.M.; Yang, N.; Wang, W.K.; Shen, Y.F.; Yang, B.; Wang, Y.H. A novel cold-active lipase from Candida albicans: Cloning, expression and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 3950–3965. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, B.H.; Zeng, L.Q.; Song, H.L.; Shi, Q.Q.; Wu, S.G. Cloning and expression of Aspergillus tamarii FS132 lipase gene in Pichia pastoris. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2010, 11, 2373–2382. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, M.R.; Lange, S.; Richter, S.; Tan, T.W.; Schmid, R.D. High-level expression of extracellular lipase Lip2 from Yarrowia lipolytica in Pichia pastoris and its purification and characterization. Protein Expr. Purif 2007, 53, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.K.; Liu, L.Y. Codon optimization through a two-step gene synthesis leads to a high-level expression of Aspergillus niger lip 2 gene in Pichia pastoris. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym 2010, 63, 164–169. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.L.; Lin, Y.T.; Liang, T.W.; Chio, S.H.; Ming, L.J.; Wu, P.C. Purification and characterization of extracellular lipases from Pseudomonas monteilii TKU009 by the use of soybeans as the substrate. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2009, 36, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Yoo, H.Y.; Simkhada, J.R.; Cho, S.S.; Park, D.H.; Kim, S.W.; Seong, C.N.; Yoo, J.C. A novel alkaline lipase from Ralstonia with potential application in biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol 2011, 102, 6104–6111. [Google Scholar]
- Minning, S.; Schmidt-Dannert, C.; Schmid, R.D. Functional expression of Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris: High-level production and some properties. J. Biotechnol 1998, 66, 147–156. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, Q.C.; Xiao, S.J.; He, B.F.; Liu, X.N. Purification and characterization of an organic solvent-tolerant lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa LX1 and its application for biodiesel production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym 2010, 66, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J.Y.; Yang, J.K.; Xu, L.; Yan, Y.J. Gene cloning, overexpression and characterization of a novel organic solvent tolerant and thermostable lipase from Galactomyces geotrichum Y05. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym 2007, 49, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, M.R.; Qin, S.W.; Tan, T.W. Purification and characterization of the extracellular lipase Lip2 from Yarrowia lipolytica. Process Biochem 2007, 42, 384–391. [Google Scholar]
- Sharon, C.; Furugoh, S.; Yamakido, T.; Ogawa, H.I.; Kato, Y. Purification and characterization of a lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa KKA-5 and its role in castor oil hydrolysis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1998, 20, 304–307. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, Y.Y.; Qian, Y.K.; Li, Z.F.; Wu, Z.H.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.Z. A novel cold-adapted lipase from Sorangium cellulosum strain So0157-2: Gene cloning, expression, and enzymatic characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 6765–6780. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.S.; Sohn, J.H.; Kim, H.K. Catalytic properties of a lipase from Photobacterium lipolyticum for biodiesel production containing a high methanol concentration. J. Biosci. Bioeng 2009, 107, 599–604. [Google Scholar]
- Shimada, Y.; Sugihara, A.; Nakano, H.; Nagao, T.; Suenaga, M.; Nakai, S.; Tominaga, Y. Fatty acid specificity of Rhizopus delemar lipase in acidolysis. J. Ferment. Bioeng 1997, 83, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
- Du, W.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zeng, J.; Liu, D.H. Novozym 435-catalysed transesterification of crude soya bean oils for biodiesel production in a solvent-free medium. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem 2004, 40, 187–190. [Google Scholar]
|Purification steps||Total activity (U)||Total protein (mg)||Specific activity (U/mg)||Yield (%)||Purification factor|
|Metal ions (1 mM)||Relative activity (%)||Metal ions (1 mM)||Relative activity (%)|
|Ca2+||111 ± 2||Co2+||84 ± 3|
|Zn2+||42 ± 1||K+||106 ± 3|
|Li+||89 ± 3||Na+||105 ± 4|
|Fe3+||76 ± 3||Hg+||0|
|Mn2+||88 ± 4||Ag+||5 ± 1|
|Mg2+||107 ± 3||EDTA||90 ± 5|
|Organic solvents||Relative activity (%)||Organic solvents||Relative activity (%)|
|Methanol||22 ± 3||Acetone||27 ± 3|
|Ethanol||14 ± 1||Butanol||11 ± 2|
|Isopropanol||17 ± 1||Chloroform||16 ± 2|
|Hexane||61 ± 4||Glycerol||104 ± 6|
|Solvent concentrations (%)||Relative activity (%)|
|5||98 ± 5||101 ± 3|
|10||97 ± 4||88 ± 4|
|20||91 ± 3||81 ± 4|
|30||61 ± 4||41 ± 3|
|40||22 ± 1||16 ± 2|
|Substrates||Relative activity (%)||Substrates||Relative activity (%)|
|Olive oil||100||Olive oil||100|
|Tributyrin (C4)||23 ± 2||Methyl butyrate (C4)||5 ± 2|
|Tricaprylin (C8)||134 ± 6||Methyl caprylin (C8)||8 ± 2|
|Trilaurin (C12)||156 ± 4||Methyl laurate (C12)||9 ± 1|
|Tripalmitin (C16)||178 ± 4||Methyl palmitate (C16)||11 ± 2|
|Tristearin (C18)||45 ± 3||Methyl stearate (C18)||10 ± 2|
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).