Next Article in Journal
Hyperoside Downregulates the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) and Promotes Proliferation in ECV304 Cells via the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinases (JNK) Pathway Following Stimulation by Advanced Glycation End-Products In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
The Lack of Cytotoxic Effect and Radioadaptive Response in Splenocytes of Mice Exposed to Low Level Internal β-Particle Irradiation through Tritiated Drinking Water in Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
HE4 Transcription- and Splice Variants-Specific Expression in Endometrial Cancer and Correlation with Patient Survival
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Comet Assay for Assessing the Dose-Response Relationship of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(11), 22678-22696; doi:10.3390/ijms141122678

Membrane Signaling Induced by High Doses of Ionizing Radiation in the Endothelial Compartment. Relevance in Radiation Toxicity
Isabelle Corre *, Maëva Guillonneau and François Paris
CRCNA-UMR Inserm U892-CNRS 6299-Institut de Recherche en Santé de l’Université de Nantes, Nantes 44007, France; E-Mails: (M.G.); (F.P.)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail:; Tel.: +33-2-28-08-03-32; Fax: +33-2-28-08-02-04.
Received: 9 October 2013; in revised form: 1 November 2013 / Accepted: 6 November 2013 /
Published: 18 November 2013


: Tumor areas can now be very precisely delimited thanks to technical progress in imaging and ballistics. This has also led to the development of novel radiotherapy protocols, delivering higher doses of ionizing radiation directly to cancer cells. Despite this, radiation toxicity in healthy tissue remains a major issue, particularly with dose-escalation in these new protocols. Acute and late tissue damage following irradiation have both been linked to the endothelium irrigating normal tissues. The molecular mechanisms involved in the endothelial response to high doses of radiation are associated with signaling from the plasma membrane, mainly via the acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide pathway. This review describes this signaling pathway and discusses the relevance of targeting endothelial signaling to protect healthy tissues from the deleterious effects of high doses of radiation.
radiotherapy; radiation toxicity; endothelium; plasma membrane; acid sphingomyelinase; ceramide

1. Introduction

In anticancer therapy, radiation therapy is a mainstay. It is largely used for the local control of tumor progression and to preserve organs. In radiation therapy, high-energy ionizing radiation is used to eradicate tumor cells. However, healthy cells located in the area neighboring the tumor also inevitably receive a considerable dose. This can cause damage to healthy tissues, which may appear immediately or later, if the patient survives. The number of cancer survivors is steadily increasing, thus it is important to assess how early and late radiation toxicity to normal tissues affects quality of life for these patients [1]. Because of this, the dose of radiation is restricted to avoid excess damage to healthy tissue. This has limited attempts to increase the therapeutic ratio (i.e., maximization of tumor sterilization while sparing the surrounding normal tissue) as part of modern treatment.

Radiation delivery has significantly improved in recent decades, mainly through advances in computer technology. Improved tumor imaging combined with precise modulation of radiation beams has led to the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and high-dose hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy [2]. Among these new protocols, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a very promising tool, allowing delivery of limited fractions (1–4) of high doses of radiation (7.7 to 45 Gray (Gy)). This is possible because the tumor is very accurately localized. Recent clinical trials of SBRT revealed that it is feasible, effective and safe for the treatment of early primary tumors and oligometastatic diseases [3,4]. Although SBRT is designed to minimize irradiation of the healthy tissue surrounding the tumor, we currently have little feedback on early and late SBRT toxicity. This is mainly due to limited clinical data including long-term follow-up and to poor knowledge of the radiobiology of high doses of radiation [5]. The model conventionally used to predict tumor response and normal tissue toxicity from fractionated radiation, is the cell survival linear-quadratic model (LQ). This model appears to be too simplistic for SBRT, leading to overestimation of cell toxicity [6]. Indeed, the LQ model is essentially based on the capacity of normal cells to repair radiation-induced DNA damage. However, other molecular mechanisms may be involved and non-dividing cells present in normal tissues could also play a role [4].

Among this population of non-dividing cells, the microvascular endothelial compartment has clearly been shown to play a central role in radiation toxicity in healthy tissues. Several preclinical studies have established that radiation levels above 10 Gy cause endothelial cells to enter apoptotic cell death, resulting then in toxicity to the central nervous system [7] and to the small intestines [8]. Vascular injury has long been known to be the most common effect of exposing normal tissues to radiation, and the microvascular network is the most sensitive constituent of the vascular system [9]. The response of the microvasculature to radiation can be classed according to acute and late effects, both of which contribute to the initiation, progression and maintenance of tissue damage [10]. Following exposure to high doses of radiation (>10 Gy), a rapid wave of apoptosis appears as a hallmark of acute endothelial reaction. Surviving cells develop a dysfunctional vascular phenotype marked by excess secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, increased recruitment of blood cells and platelets, activation of the coagulation system and increased vascular permeability [11]. Late effects include microvessel collapse, thickening of the basement membrane, and persistence of an activated, pro-coagulant endothelial phenotype, which is ultimately senescent [12]. Through these effects, the microenvironment of normal tissue surrounding the irradiated tumor becomes a hypoxic, pro-inflammatory environment. This can cause damage to normal cells by inducing ischemia, necrosis and fibrosis (Figure 1).

Thus, even if the radiobiology of high doses of radiation is still incompletely understood, the endothelial compartment appears to be a major target, which when damaged can lead to radiation toxicity in normal tissues [13]. A single dose of 15–20 Gy induces molecular mechanisms of endothelial apoptosis, which requires activation of the acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase)/ceramide pathway [8,14]. This pathway is not triggered in tissues exposed to conventional fractionated radiotherapy [15]. Thus, these pioneering results demonstrated that an alternative radiation-induced signaling pathway exists, involving plasma membrane-initiated but nuclear-independent events [16]. The initial evidence for membrane signaling initially originated from studies on cancer cells exposed to low doses of radiation, where tyrosine kinase receptors epithelial growth factor-receptor (EGF-R), phosphoinositide 3-kinase PI3K/AKT and the Ras/Raf/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were shown to mediate radiation sensitivity [17]. The role of membrane signaling in the response to radiation has now been clearly demonstrated, and the ASMase/ceramide signaling triggered in endothelium exposed to single high doses of radiation has been shown to play a major role.

This review will discuss what is currently known about the molecular signaling pathways induced in the endothelial compartment by high doses of radiation, such as those delivered by SBRT. Emphasis is placed on plasma membrane signaling events. Potential strategies to preserve and protect the microvasculature, thus preventing radiation toxicity in normal tissues, are also discussed.

2. Radiation-Induced Plasma Membrane Signaling in the Endothelial Compartment

2.1. Activation of the Acid Sphingomyelinase Pathway

2.1.1. Translocation and Activation of ASMase

Cellular studies were the first to demonstrated a rapid activation of the enzyme acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) at the plasma membrane in bovine endothelial cells exposed to a high single dose of ionizing radiation [16]. Human lymphoblast deficient for ASMase enzyme [18] and endothelial cells from mice invalidated for the ASMase gene smpd1 [7] were found to be resistant to radiation-induced apoptosis. Thus, a key role of the ASMase pathway in radiobiology signaling in the endothelium was established.

ASMase catalyses the hydrolysis of the sphingolipid sphingomyelin (SM) at the outer layer of the plasma membrane, producing ceramide [19]. In vitro studies initially showed that ASMase performs optimally at an acidic pH; this is consistent with the lysosomal localization of this protein. Nevertheless, ASMase is also active at the cell’s surface membrane, where the lipid composition of the membrane can alter the Km of the enzyme, allowing its activation at a higher pH [20]. Very recent data in endothelial cells demonstrate that an acidic microenvironment is created at the plasma membrane upon fusion with lysosomes, enabling ASMase activity [21]. The initial step in ASMase activation appears to be translocation from the lysosomes to the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane, where its substrate sphingomyelin is located. A broad range of stresses (cytokines, viruses, ultraviolet (UV)) has been shown to induce ASMase trafficking in different cell types [2224]. The rapid translocation of ASMase to the cell surface in endothelial cells exposed to 15 Gy appears to be a pre-requisite triggering intracellular apoptotic signals in these cells [25]. Several studies have investigated the molecular pathways involved in ASMase translocation from secretory lysosomes to the external face of the plasma membrane. These studies showed that various proteins of the exocytotic machinery, in particular the t-SNARE protein syntaxin-4 [26] and the protein dysferlin in endothelial cells [27], participate in lysosome fusion with membranes, therefore leading to ASMase translocation.

Despite intensive research into ASMase signaling, the molecular mechanisms causing activation of this enzyme are still not fully elucidated. ASMase might be activated in several different ways, depending on cells and stimuli. For example, proteases of the caspases family have been shown to regulate ASMase activation. In pro-apoptotic Fas/Fas ligand signaling, caspase-8 promotes ASMase translocation and activity [24], whereas upon tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) signaling, caspase-7 can activate ASMase activation by direct interaction and proteolytic cleavage [28]. ASMase has also been found to be regulated by phosphorylation, with recombinant PKC-δ phosphorylating ASMase on serine-508. This phosphorylation appears to be necessary for the protein translocation and activation in carcinoma cells [29]. In stress conditions, ASMase could be regulated by redox mechanisms, and several studies support this hypothesis: oxidation at cysteine-629 in the C-terminal portion of ASMase leads to dimerization and increases its enzymatic activity [30], while scavengers for reactive oxygen species (ROS) prevent activation of ASMase by death receptors [23], UV-C [22] or Cu2+[31]. Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can also specifically activate an acidic sphingomyelinase in airway epithelium [32]. In endothelial cells, the contribution of ROS and redox signaling to ASMase activation has been proven by Li and co-workers [33], who described ROS-dependant ASMase activation, as well as a feed-forward loop amplifying ROS production, which is detailed below. Ionizing radiation can be considered as a receptor-independent stimulus activating ASMase signaling. The first intracellular radiochemical event induced by ionizing radiation consists of a rapid burst of ROS, as a result of H2O radiolysis [34]. Thus, it is possible that activation of ASMase upon exposure to radiation might be provoked by oxidation through ROS produced by radiolysis. Indeed, anti-oxidants such as glutathione and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) impair plasma membrane translocation and activation of ASMase in microvascular endothelial cells exposed to 15 Gy [35].

2.1.2. Ceramide, a Plasma Membrane Reorganizer

In response to radiation, ASMase activation results in the rapid and transient production of the sphingolipid ceramide. This bioactive lipid is an evolutionarily conserved second messenger, composed of a fatty acyl chain of variable length (the most common mammalian ceramides contain 14 to 24 carbon atoms) bound to the amino group of a sphingosine [36]. Ceramides are among the least polar and most hydrophobic sphingolipids and possess unique biophysical properties. In artificial membranes, ceramide molecules tend to spontaneously self-associate, excluding other lipids [37,38]. This creates small membrane ceramide-enriched domains, which can spontaneously coalesce to generate larger domains [36].

Biological membranes typically contain sphingolipids, cholesterol and other glycophospholipids. In this context, sphingolipids interact with each other through their hydrophilic part and with cholesterol molecules through their ceramide moiety forming hydrogen bonds and Van der Waals interactions with the sterol ring. These tight interactions promote the lateral association of sphingolipids and cholesterol molecules and result in the appearance of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-enriched domains, also known as membrane lipid rafts (LRs) in the cellular membrane [39]. Based on this model, and with regard to the biophysical properties of ceramide, an increase in membrane ceramide content would provoke extensive spatial reorganization, resulting from the fusion of membrane LRs into large ceramide-enriched domains. Indeed, several studies have shown these large LRs to occur in cells in response to different stimuli (CD95, CD40-L, viruses, chemotherapeutics, UV, etc. [40]). All these stimuli are known to trigger ceramide generation by ASMase. Biochemical fractionation and confocal fluorescent microscopy experiments have clearly demonstrated that LRs participate in signal transduction, as they serve to cluster signaling receptors and molecules in the plasma membrane, facilitating their activation [41]. In the context of radiation, these membrane LRs were first shown to be linked to the radiation sensitivity of human carcinoma cells [42]. This underlines the importance of the plasma membrane organization in ceramide-enriched LRs in the cellular response to ionizing radiation. In the endothelial compartment, the ASMase/ceramide pathway was rapidly identified as essential to initiating radiation-induced apoptosis [16]. This was recently proven, once again showing how membrane reorganization into ceramide-enriched large domains contributes to driving transmission of radiation-induced signaling [43].

The first role identified for ceramide-enriched domains was in the pro-apoptotic signaling pathway mediated by death receptors like CD95 and CD40 [44,45]. These domains trap and cluster receptors and intracellular signaling molecules, with consequent formation of an apoptotic “signalosome”, which can efficiently transmit and amplify the signal inside the cell. Aggregation and trapping of death receptors in ceramide-enriched domains limits their lateral diffusion, thus stabilizing receptor-ligands interaction [41]. In response to radiation in endothelial cells, ceramide-enriched LRs are also essential in transmitting apoptotic signals; this can be prevented by hindering the formation of these domains. Thus, both an anti-ceramide antibody [43] and LRs disruptors (filipin, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD)) [35] protect endothelial cells from radiation-induced cell apoptotic cell death. However, the intracellular signaling pathways involved have yet to be fully deciphered.

The best-characterized signaling molecules in ceramide-enriched domains are clusters of death receptors [44]. Very few other molecules have yet been specifically identified in these domains, except in endothelial cells, where subunits gp91phox and p47phox of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (NOX) are concentrated in ceramide-enriched domains following ASMase activation [33,46]. Endothelial NOX is a multi-enzymatic complex involved in the reduction of molecular oxygen and generation of superoxide radicals, O2•−, is now considered as the primary enzymatic source of vascular ROS. The concept of redox lipid rafts was initially proposed to describe membrane LRs where NOX components were recruited, clustered and activated, therefore leading to ROS production [47]. The ASMase/ceramide pathway now appears essential to the formation of these redox domains [33], as ceramide-enriched domains promote aggregation and activation of the NOX complex. The initial functions attributed to structurally organized membrane domains LRs was the transmission and the amplification of intracellular signals [48]. In the case of redox LRs, a similar feed-forward amplification mechanism was proposed in endothelial cells [33], as ROS produced by NOX within ceramide-enriched domains may further enhance ASMase activation through an oxidative mechanism [30]. This would result in enhanced formation of ceramide LRs, thus amplifying the whole system. Activation of NOX through such domains is induced in the endothelial compartment in response to death factors Fas-L, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and endostatin [33,49,50]. Ionizing radiation also activates NOX in microvascular endothelial cells by an as yet unknown mechanism [51]. The ASMase/ceramide pathway might be involved in ionizing radiation-induced NOX activation, through formation of redox LRs. Hence, oxidative stress signaling initiated by ionizing radiation could be enhanced through the positive feedback from ASMase. By inducing the formation of ceramide and redox LRs, ASMase contributes to ROS production by NOX, which in turn could retro-activate ASMase. This could also explain how just few primary ionization events caused by the direct effects of radiation on water molecules, could be sufficiently amplified to cause rapid and robust activation of cellular signaling pathways.

2.1.3. Ceramide, a Second Messenger

In addition to its involvement in reorganizing the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, ceramide was also shown to directly interact with proteins on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. This is possible as ceramide molecules can slowly flip from the outer- to the inner-side of the lipid bilayer [52]. In vitro studies revealed several signaling proteins, which are direct effectors of ceramide. The ceramide-activated protein phosphatase (CAPP), namely PP2A and PP1 [53], are specifically activated by specific binding to ceramide [54]. These proteins regulate various signaling proteins: retinoblastoma gene product Rb, Bcl-2, AKT, c-Jun, PKC-α. Ceramide has also been described as an activator of the kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) protein [55], which phosphorylates the protein Raf-1 [56]. A specific ceramide-binding domain was identified in KSR. This domain seems to be required for translocation of the kinase to the membrane [57]. Another well-characterized direct target of ceramide is PKC-ζ which is directly bound and activated by natural long-acyl chain ceramides [5860]. Activation of the aspartic protease cathepsin D by ceramide has been described [61]. This links ceramide to the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway via activation of the protein Bid. Recent studies also identified plasma membrane ions channels as novel targets of ceramide, in particular the storage-operated Ca2+ channel involved in controlling calcium influx [62,63] and voltage-gated Kv1.3 K+ channels [64] which modulate potassium efflux. To date, none of these pathways triggered by direct interaction between ceramide and intracellular molecules were initially described in endothelial cells. However, direct targets of ceramide including CAPP, KSR, PKC, and cathepsin D, are ubiquitously expressed and could potentially be regulated in the endothelial compartment. PP2A, in particular, is described as involved in disrupting endothelial barrier integrity [65], while cathepsin D plays a role in apoptosis and redox signaling [66] and PKC-ζ is involved in gene transcription and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation [67].

2.2. The Rho Family of Small GTPases

In addition to its complex lateral organization as a lipid bilayer, the plasma membrane is also linked to the actin cytoskeleton through interaction with lipid or protein effectors, which tether actin filaments to its inner face. The cytoskeleton plays a major role in maintaining cell shape. Ionizing radiation has been clearly shown to alter cytoskeletal organization [6870]. In vitro studies have highlighted different effects of radiation on the actin network, which vary depending on cell type and the dose delivered. In pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, cytoskeletal disorganization with changes to actin filaments was observed following doses between 6 and 30 Gy [68,71]. In dermal microvascular cells, a dose of 15 to 20 Gy led to a rapid and persistent increase in stress fiber formation [69,70]. Actin structures are mainly reorganized through the action of specialized proteins, namely the Rho family of small GTPases, which includes RhoA, Rac and Cdc42 [72]. The role played by RhoA in the endothelial response to a single high dose of radiation (15–20 Gy) has been addressed by two separate studies [69,70]. Their results show a rapid and transient activation of RhoA. This activation then leads to reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, marked by the formation of stress fibers, and resulting in increased endothelial permeability [69], enhanced formation of focal adhesions structures and altered migration [70]. Cdc42 GTPases has also been linked to activation of primary microvascular endothelial cells in response to ionizing radiation [73]. The mechanisms leading to GTPase activation still remain to be elucidated and no direct link between the ASMase/ceramide signaling pathway and Rho GTPases has been described in endothelial cells. Nevertheless, in vitro studies with exogenous ceramides (short- or natural long-chain forms) identified both RhoA [74] and Rac [75] as potential ceramide targets. All members of this GTPase family only become fully activated upon anchoring to the inner face of the plasma membrane through their hydrophobic isoprenoid (farnesyl or geranylgeranyl) moiety. Several studies have suggested that GTPases concentrate at the plasma membrane in LRs, where they become activated [76,77]. Therefore, Rho GTPases could be activated through signals originating in ceramide-enriched domains. Indeed, one study has shown Rac to be present in redox LRs in endothelial cells, where it forms part of the multi-enzymatic complex NOX [47].

3. Protecting Tissues from Radiation Toxicity by Targeting the Endothelium

The radiation doses above 10 Gy used in new hypofractionated radiotherapy strategies, such as SBRT, have a strong impact on the endothelium irrigating normal tissues. As mentioned before, early and late endothelial damage to the endothelium contribute to radiation toxicity in healthy tissues. Apoptotic loss of endothelial cells causes local ischemia, deregulated expression of adhesion molecules and secretion of cytokines. This creates a pro-inflammatory and a pro-coagulant environment. These acute effects often become persistent, leading to the establishment of a chronically dysfunctional endothelium, which can then lead to the formation of fibrotic tissue [78] and could even induce cardiovascular damage [79]. Therefore, protecting the endothelium from damage due to high-dose radiation is an attractive alternative therapeutic means to limit radiation toxicity in normal tissues. The relevance of the ASMase/ceramide pathway in the radiobiology of high-dose radiation prompts us to present a number of strategies to limit its activation (Figure 2).

3.1. Targeting the ASMase Activity

To limit the impact of signaling pathways dependent on the ASMase/ceramide pathway, an obvious approach would be to inhibit ASMase enzymatic activity itself. The three-dimensional structure of ASMase is not fully known and no crystallographic data are available yet. This has limited the development of direct specific inhibitors and those that exist show poor specificity. To date, only very few examples of direct ASMase inhibitors have been described, among which are phosphatidylinositol-3, 5-biphosphonate and natural xanthone compounds [80].

On the other hand, a broad group of molecules acting indirectly on ASMase activity has also been described. These are termed functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMA) [81]. They do not directly inhibit ASMase but act through an alternative mechanism based on the detachment of ASMase from the inner face of the lysosomal membrane, causing its proteolytic degradation. In normal conditions, positively charged protein ASMase attaches to the inner leaf of the lysosomal membrane through electrostatic interactions. FIASMA are lipophilic weak bases [81], thus they gain access inside the lysosome, where they become protonated and thus positively charged. This modifies the electrostatic properties of the inner surface of the lysosomal membrane and disrupts ASMase attachment, leading to its breakdown by lysosomal proteases. Seventy-two drugs approved by the Federal Drug Administration have been experimentally shown to inhibit ASMase activity, although none possess a unique specificity for ASMase [82]. Only one clinical study, involving cystic fibrosis treatment [83], used a drug from the FIASMA group, amitriptyline, specifically for its action on the ASMase.

3.2. Counteracting the Pro-Apoptotic Activity of Ceramide

The crucial role of endothelial cells in controlling radiation toxicity to healthy tissues has been demonstrated in many tissues, including the small intestines, brain, lung and parotid glands [7,8,18,84]. For example, C56BL/6 mice exposed to whole-body or whole-abdominal irradiation at 15 Gy died within days due to gastrointestinal syndrome (GIS). In these animals, microvascular endothelial apoptosis led to total collapse of the epithelial functionality [8]. Genetic invalidation of ASMase protects mice from GIS-related death following 15 Gy irradiation by preventing ceramide-induced apoptosis in the endothelial compartment. A similar protection from radiation-induced intestinal toxicity was achieved by intravenous injection of the pro-angiogenic factor bFGF. This molecule mainly targets the microvascular endothelium. This was the first evidence that tissues could be protected from radiation toxicity by targeting endothelial cells. However, this treatment seems compromised in human clinical trials, because it induces side effects including hypotension [85]. Recent data from the same group confirmed the potential role of pro-angiogenic molecules in limiting radiation toxicity in the endothelium in in vitro studies [25]. Treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibited radiation-induced apoptosis through repression of the ASMase activation. The connection between the inhibition of ceramide-induced apoptosis and the late radiation toxicity remains unclear. However, ceramide is involved in long-term physiopathologies, such as cystic fibrosis [86]. Pharmalogical treatment with ASMase inhibitors or genetic heterozygosity of ASMase minimizes release of pulmonary inflammatory cytokines in mice developing cystic fibrosis. More studies must be done after exposure to ionizing radiation to properly establish the potential role of drugs targeting ceramide and preventing both acute and late toxicity.

The bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a ceramide metabolite, involved in numerous cellular functions, especially in cell survival. This pro-survival effect of S1P generally occurs when apoptotic signals are induced by ceramide [8789]. Hence, the existence of a ceramide/S1P rheostat has been suggested to contribute to the cellular apoptosis/survival equilibrium [90]. In a murine intestinal radiation toxicity model, S1P was used as a ceramide antagonist, injected retro-orbitally into animals before whole-body irradiation at 15 Gy [91]. The radioprotective effects of S1P were clearly demonstrated, as S1P-injected were rescued from radiation-induced GIS. However, these animals died later from bone marrow aplasia. The specific cellular targets of S1P in the small intestine are microvascular endothelial cells and neither epithelial cell nor lymphocytes were protected from radiation-induced apoptosis in these animals. Further examination of the molecular radioprotective pathway regulated by S1P in endothelial cells revealed that it binds to receptors which in turn activate an AKT-dependent survival pathway [91]. Decoupling these seven-transmembrane-domain receptors using pertussis toxin or inhibiting the AKT-pathway with specific inhibitors prevents in vitro and in vivo S1P-induced radiation protection. However, S1P is a bioactive sphingolipid involved in a large number of cellular functions, including differentiation, cell trafficking, inflammation and migration. S1P also exhibits strong pro-angiogenic properties [92]. Because of this broad-ranging activity, S1P’s influence on late endothelial dysfunctions and related toxicity has yet to be determined.

In any case, it seems inconceivable to use pro-angiogenic drugs as radioprotectors of healthy tissues in a context of radiotherapy, as the primary effect of these molecules in an oncogenic environment would be to promote tumor angiogenesis, resulting in a burst in tumorigenesis and/or in metastasis [92]. Molecules targeting the endothelium but devoid of any pro-angiogenic activity would be suitable alternatives. This type of approach was explored by one study, where injection of an angiopoietin-1 variant, which exclusively targets the survival pathway in quiescent endothelial cells without affecting angiogenesis, was found to protect animals against radiation-induced endothelial apoptosis, leading to intestinal radioprotective effects [93]. S1P also targets only non-proliferating quiescent endothelial cells and not angiogenic tumoral endothelium [94], thus it could be a relevant avenue of investigation. Selective protection of quiescent endothelium may provide opportunities to define selective radioprotectors for normal tissues.

3.3. Targeting the Formation of Ceramide-Enriched LRs

As mentioned above, the ASMase-generated ceramide contributes to transmitting intracellular signals by rearranging the plasma membrane and promoting the formation of ceramide-enriched domains. Hence, interfering with the formation of these domains is an attractive option to efficiently block signal transduction induced by plasma membrane ceramide. Manipulating lipid raft domains without irreversibly destroying the cell structure has proved difficult, and targeting sphingolipids, the major constituents of membrane LRs, is all but impossible. Cholesterol, which is also abundantly present in these membrane domains, has been extensively targeted in attempts to disrupt LRs, using two different types of interfering agents. Cholesterol-depletors such as MβCD, specifically remove cholesterol from membrane domains, while cholesterol-sequestrators, like filipin and nystatin, bind this lipid in LRs, decreasing the fluidity of these domains. This blocks the clustering and aggregation of signaling molecules [95]. However, none of these molecules can be considered as potential therapeutic drugs, as they are toxic and/or have non-specific effects.

Among available drugs, statins are well-characterized as lipid-lowering drugs, inhibiting the mevalonate pathway of cholesterol synthesis. This decreases the level of circulating plasma cholesterol. Statin treatment also reduces the amount of cholesterol in LRs leading to their disruption [96]. In endothelial cells, chronic exposure to lovastatin or atorvastatin leads to disruption of membrane LRs and consequently to spatial disorganization of the oxidized-low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) receptor (LOX-1). This protects the endothelium from the adverse effects of ox-LDL [96]. A very recent study reinforces this notion of a protective effect of statins through regulation of the dynamics of ceramide-enriched domains [97]. In arterial endothelial cells exposed to ox-LDL, pretreatment with statins protects cells from oxidative stress by preventing the formation of ceramide-enriched platforms. The resulting inhibition of NOX assembly and activation reduces ROS production, thereby limiting the deleterious effects of ox-LDL [97]. In the context of ionizing radiation, statins also protect endothelial cells from radiation-induced damage. In vitro, they exert persistent anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects on irradiated endothelial cells [98]. Preclinical studies of a rodent model of radiation toxicity in the skin, showed that pravastatin treatment abolished radiation-induced endothelial dysfunctions and had therapeutic effects on irradiated skin [99]. Neither of these studies addresses how statins achieve these effects, but it is possible they cause disorganization of membrane ceramide-enriched platforms in the membrane by reducing available membrane cholesterol. By interfering with the mevalonate pathway, statins also block the synthesis of isoprenoid intermediates, which are essential for trafficking and activation of small GTPases at the membrane [100]. Thus, statins can also be considered to be indirect inhibitors of small GTPases. In microvascular endothelial cells, the effects of statins on radiation-induced RhoA activity have not yet been tested [69,70]. Nevertheless, statins may play a role in preventing radiation-induced Rho GTPase-dependent effects. In a model of radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis involving Rho proteins [101], pravastatin limits damage, possibly via inactivation of the RhoA/ROCK pathway [102].

Specifically targeting membrane ceramide to prevent radiation toxicity was recently achieved through the development and characterization of a specific anti-ceramide antibody [43]. The monoclonal 2A2 antibody binds to membrane ceramide molecules, blocks their redistribution and therefore prevents the formation of ceramide-enriched domains in endothelial plasma membranes. Without these structures, transmission of radiation-induced apoptotic signals is impaired. 2A2 antibody applied to the C56BL/6 model of radiation-induced intestinal toxicity also protects animals from death by GIS. Results from this study emphasize that intestinal crypts are protected from radiation-induced lethality by inhibition of endothelial cell apoptosis, through reduced formation of ceramide-enriched domains. Thus, this monoclonal antibody can be considered as the prototype of a new class of anti-ceramide therapeutics, potentially useful in radioprotection of healthy tissues.

4. Conclusions

For decades, radiobiologists assumed that the DNA damage response was the only signaling pathway involved in the cellular response to ionizing radiation. While not disregarding this response, laboratory experiments and preclinical studies have now revealed additional biological processes involved in radiation toxicity in normal tissues exposed to a high single dose radiation. First, the crucial role of the microvascular microenvironment was established when rapid endothelial apoptosis and vascular collapse was shown to markedly enhance radiation-induced damage to normal cells. Second, the molecular mechanisms were characterized, highlighting the existence of a major signal transduction pathway, initiated at the plasma membrane but independent of nuclear events, requiring activation of the acid sphingomyelinase pathway. As illustrated in Figure 3, ASMase and ceramide are the main components of this radiation-induced endothelial signaling pathway. Membrane translocation of ASMase and its activation (Steps 1 and 2) produce ceramide. This transmits signals through lateral membrane reorganization, forming ceramide-enriched LRs domains (Step 3), or directly activates signaling molecules. An alternative endothelial signaling pathway involves the Rho family of small GTPases; these are suspected, but not proven, to be dependent on ceramide. In the endothelium, the intracellular ROS appear to play a key role in initiating, coordinating and amplifying plasma membrane events. The initial wave of ROS resulting from H2O radiolysis (ROS, in grey in Figure 3) might trigger the membrane ceramide pathway through ASMase activation. A second wave of ROS produced by ceramide-induced NOX activation (ROS, in orange in Figure 3) could then amplify the whole process and/or activate effectors. Altogether, this shows endothelial cells to mount a rather complex response to a high single dose of ionizing radiation, stressing the major role of the bioactive sphingolipid ceramide and the important contribution of ROS and the resulting oxidative stress.

Several strategies proposed to protect healthy tissue from radiation toxicity have been recently reviewed [103]: non-specific approaches using antioxidant molecules to neutralize radiation-induced oxidative stress, more specific treatments directly targeting normal tissue: p53 modulation, injection of hormones or cytokine to stimulate proliferation, stem cell therapies, etc. Nevertheless, targeting the microvascular endothelial network is also a promising approach to limiting radiation toxicity to normal tissues. Inactivating signaling pathways involved in the endothelial response to radiation could be a suitable alternative, especially through therapies targeting the ASMase/ceramide pathway, which are currently in development.

Ijms 14 22678f1 1024
Figure 1. Early and late effects of ionizing radiations on endothelial cells. Relevance in tissue radiation toxicity.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Early and late effects of ionizing radiations on endothelial cells. Relevance in tissue radiation toxicity.
Ijms 14 22678f1 1024
Ijms 14 22678f2 1024
Figure 2. Targeting the ASMase pathway in the endothelium. See text for details.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Targeting the ASMase pathway in the endothelium. See text for details.
Ijms 14 22678f2 1024
Ijms 14 22678f3 1024
Figure 3. Diagram of the plasma membrane signaling pathways induced by ionizing radiation in endothelial cells. See text for details.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Diagram of the plasma membrane signaling pathways induced by ionizing radiation in endothelial cells. See text for details.
Ijms 14 22678f3 1024


The authors are grateful to Jacques Huot, Stéphane Supiot and Rym Abderrahmani for their critical reading and comments on the manuscript, and to Maighread Gallagher for English editing.


ASMaseacid sphingomyelinase
bFGFbasic fibroblast growth factor
CAPPceramide-activated protein phosphatase
EGF-Repithelial growth factor-receptor
eNOSendothelial nitric oxide synthase
FIASMAfunctional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase
GISgastrointestinal syndrome
IGRTimage-guided radiotherapy
IMRTintensity-modulated radiotherapy
KSRkinase suppressor of Ras
ox-LDLoxidized-low density lipoprotein
LRslipid rafts
LOX-1oxidized-low density lipoprotein receptor
MAPKmitogen activated protein kinase
NADPHnicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NOXnicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase
PI3Kphosphoinositide 3-kinase
ROSreactive oxygen species
RNSreactive nitrogen species
SBRTstereotactic body radiotherapy
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor-α
TRAILTNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
VEGFvascular endothelial growth factor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Stone, H.B.; Coleman, C.N.; Anscher, M.S.; McBride, W.H. Effects of radiation on normal tissue: Consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 2003, 4, 529–536. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhide, S.A.; Nutting, C.M. Recent advances in radiotherapy. BMC Med 2010, 8, 25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Almaghrabi, M.Y.; Supiot, S.; Paris, F.; Mahe, M.A.; Rio, E. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for abdominal oligometastases: A biological and clinical review. Radiat. Oncol 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lo, S.S.; Fakiris, A.J.; Chang, E.L.; Mayr, N.A.; Wang, J.Z.; Papiez, L.; Teh, B.S.; McGarry, R.C.; Cardenes, H.R.; Timmerman, R.D. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: A novel treatment modality. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 2010, 7, 44–54. [Google Scholar]
  5. Milano, M.T.; Constine, L.S.; Okunieff, P. Normal tissue toxicity after small field hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation. Radiat. Oncol 2008, 3, 36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, J.M.; Koong, A.C. High-dose single-fraction radiotherapy: Exploiting a new biology? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 2008, 71, 324–325. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pena, L.A.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R.N. Radiation-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells in the murine central nervous system: Protection by fibroblast growth factor and sphingomyelinase deficiency. Cancer Res 2000, 60, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  8. Paris, F.; Fuks, Z.; Kang, A.; Capodieci, P.; Juan, G.; Ehleiter, D.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Kolesnick, R. Endothelial apoptosis as the primary lesion initiating intestinal radiation damage in mice. Science 2001, 293, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodemann, H.P.; Blaese, M.A. Responses of normal cells to ionizing radiation. Semin. Radiat. Oncol 2007, 17, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaugler, M.H. A unifying system: Does the vascular endothelium have a role to play in multi-organ failure following radiation exposure? BJR Suppl 2005, 27, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  11. Milliat, F.; Francois, A.; Tamarat, R.; Benderitter, M. Role of endothelium in radiation-induced normal tissue damages. Ann. Cardiol. Angeiol 2008, 57, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oh, C.W.; Bump, E.A.; Kim, J.S.; Janigro, D.; Mayberg, M.R. Induction of a senescence-like phenotype in bovine aortic endothelial cells by ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res 2001, 156, 232–240. [Google Scholar]
  13. Supiot, S.; Paris, F. Radiobiology dedicated to endothelium. Cancer Radiother 2012, 16, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcia-Barros, M.; Paris, F.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Lyden, D.; Rafii, S.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis. Science 2003, 300, 1155–1159. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Engaging the vascular component of the tumor response. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  16. Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Kan, C.C.; Ehleiter, D.; Persaud, R.S.; McLoughlin, M.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R.N. Ionizing radiation acts on cellular membranes to generate ceramide and initiate apoptosis. J. Exp. Med 1994, 180, 525–535. [Google Scholar]
  17. Valerie, K.; Yacoub, A.; Hagan, M.P.; Curiel, D.T.; Fisher, P.B.; Grant, S.; Dent, P. Radiation-induced cell signaling: Inside-out and outside-in. Mol. Cancer Ther 2007, 6, 789–801. [Google Scholar]
  18. Santana, P.; Pena, L.A.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Martin, S.; Green, D.; McLoughlin, M.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Schuchman, E.H.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient human lymphoblasts and mice are defective in radiation-induced apoptosis. Cell 1996, 86, 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  19. Milhas, D.; Clarke, C.J.; Hannun, Y.A. Sphingomyelin metabolism at the plasma membrane: implications for bioactive sphingolipids. FEBS Lett 2010, 584, 1887–1894. [Google Scholar]
  20. Schissel, S.L.; Jiang, X.; Tweedie-Hardman, J.; Jeong, T.; Camejo, E.H.; Najib, J.; Rapp, J.H.; Williams, K.J.; Tabas, I. Secretory sphingomyelinase, a product of the acid sphingomyelinase gene, can hydrolyze atherogenic lipoproteins at neutral pH. Implications for atherosclerotic lesion development. J. Biol. Chem 1998, 273, 2738–2746. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu, M.; Xia, M.; Li, X.X.; Han, W.Q.; Boini, K.M.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Ritter, J.K.; Li, P.L. Requirement of translocated lysosomal V1 H(+)-ATPase for activation of membrane acid sphingomyelinase and raft clustering in coronary endothelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23, 1546–1557. [Google Scholar]
  22. Charruyer, A.; Grazide, S.; Bezombes, C.; Muller, S.; Laurent, G.; Jaffrezou, J.P. UV-C light induces raft-associated acid sphingomyelinase and JNK activation and translocation independently on a nuclear signal. J. Biol. Chem 2005, 280, 19196–19204. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dumitru, C.A.; Gulbins, E. TRAIL activates acid sphingomyelinase via a redox mechanism and releases ceramide to trigger apoptosis. Oncogene 2006, 25, 5612–5625. [Google Scholar]
  24. Grassme, H.; Cremesti, A.; Kolesnick, R.; Gulbins, E. Ceramide-mediated clustering is required for CD95-DISC formation. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5457–5470. [Google Scholar]
  25. Truman, J.P.; Garcia-Barros, M.; Kaag, M.; Hambardzumyan, D.; Stancevic, B.; Chan, M.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A. Endothelial membrane remodeling is obligate for anti-angiogenic radiosensitization during tumor radiosurgery. PLoS One 2010, 5, e12310. [Google Scholar]
  26. Perrotta, C.; Bizzozero, L.; Cazzato, D.; Morlacchi, S.; Assi, E.; Simbari, F.; Zhang, Y.; Gulbins, E.; Bassi, M.T.; Rosa, P.; et al. Syntaxin 4 is required for acid sphingomyelinase activity and apoptotic function. J. Biol. Chem 2010, 285, 40240–40251. [Google Scholar]
  27. Han, W.Q.; Xia, M.; Xu, M.; Boini, K.M.; Ritter, J.K.; Li, N.J.; Li, P.L. Lysosome fusion to the cell membrane is mediated by the dysferlin C2A domain in coronary arterial endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci 2012, 125, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar]
  28. Edelmann, B.; Bertsch, U.; Tchikov, V.; Winoto-Morbach, S.; Perrotta, C.; Jakob, M.; Adam-Klages, S.; Kabelitz, D.; Schutze, S. Caspase-8 and caspase-7 sequentially mediate proteolytic activation of acid sphingomyelinase in TNF-R1 receptosomes. EMBO J 2011, 30, 379–394. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zeidan, Y.H.; Wu, B.X.; Jenkins, R.W.; Obeid, L.M.; Hannun, Y.A. A novel role for protein kinase Cdelta-mediated phosphorylation of acid sphingomyelinase in UV light-induced mitochondrial injury. FASEB J 2008, 22, 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  30. Qiu, H.; Edmunds, T.; Baker-Malcolm, J.; Karey, K.P.; Estes, S.; Schwarz, C.; Hughes, H.; van Patten, S.M. Activation of human acid sphingomyelinase through modification or deletion of C-terminal cysteine. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 32744–32752. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lang, P.A.; Schenck, M.; Nicolay, J.P.; Becker, J.U.; Kempe, D.S.; Lupescu, A.; Koka, S.; Eisele, K.; Klarl, B.A.; Rubben, H.; et al. Liver cell death and anemia in Wilson disease involve acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide. Nat. Med 2007, 13, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  32. Castillo, S.S.; Levy, M.; Thaikoottathil, J.V.; Goldkorn, T. Reactive nitrogen and oxygen species activate different sphingomyelinases to induce apoptosis in airway epithelial cells. Exp. Cell Res 2007, 313, 2680–2686. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, A.Y.; Yi, F.; Jin, S.; Xia, M.; Chen, Q.Z.; Gulbins, E.; Li, P.L. Acid sphingomyelinase and its redox amplification in formation of lipid raft redox signaling platforms in endothelial cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2007, 9, 817–828. [Google Scholar]
  34. Azzam, E.I.; Jay-Gerin, J.P.; Pain, D. Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett 2012, 327, 48–60. [Google Scholar]
  35. Paris, F.; Nantes, F.R. CRCNA. Personal communication, 2013.
  36. Kolesnick, R.N.; Goni, F.M.; Alonso, A. Compartmentalization of ceramide signaling: Physical foundations and biological effects. J. Cell Physiol 2000, 184, 285–300. [Google Scholar]
  37. Holopainen, J.M.; Subramanian, M.; Kinnunen, P.K. Sphingomyelinase induces lipid microdomain formation in a fluid phosphatidylcholine/sphingomyelin membrane. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 17562–17570. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nurminen, T.A.; Holopainen, J.M.; Zhao, H.; Kinnunen, P.K. Observation of topical catalysis by sphingomyelinase coupled to microspheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2002, 124, 12129–12134. [Google Scholar]
  39. Simons, K.; Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 1997, 387, 569–572. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Becker, K.A.; Gulbins, E. Ceramide-enriched membrane domains—Structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1788, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
  41. Stancevic, B.; Kolesnick, R. Ceramide-rich platforms in transmembrane signaling. FEBS Lett 2010, 584, 1728–1740. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bionda, C.; Hadchity, E.; Alphonse, G.; Chapet, O.; Rousson, R.; Rodriguez-Lafrasse, C.; Ardail, D. Radioresistance of human carcinoma cells is correlated to a defect in raft membrane clustering. Free Radic. Biol. Med 2007, 43, 681–694. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rotolo, J.; Stancevic, B.; Zhang, J.; Hua, G.; Fuller, J.; Yin, X.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Kim, K.; Qian, M.; Cardo-Vila, M.; et al. Anti-ceramide antibody prevents the radiation gastrointestinal syndrome in mice. J. Clin. Invest 2012, 122, 1786–1790. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gulbins, E.; Kolesnick, R. Raft ceramide in molecular medicine. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7070–7077. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kolesnick, R.; Fuks, Z. Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5897–5906. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bao, J.X.; Jin, S.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z.C.; Li, N.; Li, P.L. Activation of membrane NADPH oxidase associated with lysosome-targeted acid sphingomyelinase in coronary endothelial cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2010, 12, 703–712. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, A.Y.; Yi, F.; Zhang, G.; Gulbins, E.; Li, P.L. Lipid raft clustering and redox signaling platform formation in coronary arterial endothelial cells. Hypertension 2006, 47, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  48. Viola, A. The amplification of TCR signaling by dynamic membrane microdomains. Trends Immunol 2001, 22, 322–327. [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, X.; Han, W.Q.; Boini, K.M.; Xia, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.L. TRAIL death receptor 4 signaling via lysosome fusion and membrane raft clustering in coronary arterial endothelial cells: Evidence from ASM knockout mice. J. Mol. Med 2013, 91, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, F.; Li, P.L. Critical role of lipid raft redox signaling platforms in endostatin-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2008, 28, 485–490. [Google Scholar]
  51. Collins-Underwood, J.R.; Zhao, W.; Sharpe, J.G.; Robbins, M.E. NADPH oxidase mediates radiation-induced oxidative stress in rat brain microvascular endothelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med 2008, 45, 929–938. [Google Scholar]
  52. Contreras, F.X.; Villar, A.V.; Alonso, A.; Kolesnick, R.N.; Goni, F.M. Sphingomyelinase activity causes transbilayer lipid translocation in model and cell membranes. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 37169–37174. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chalfant, C.E.; Kishikawa, K.; Mumby, M.C.; Kamibayashi, C.; Bielawska, A.; Hannun, Y.A. Long chain ceramides activate protein phosphatase-1 and protein phosphatase-2A. Activation is stereospecific and regulated by phosphatidic acid. J. Biol. Chem 1999, 274, 20313–20317. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chalfant, C.E.; Szulc, Z.; Roddy, P.; Bielawska, A.; Hannun, Y.A. The structural requirements for ceramide activation of serine-threonine protein phosphatases. J. Lipid Res 2004, 45, 496–506. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yan, F.; John, S.K.; Polk, D.B. Kinase suppressor of Ras determines survival of intestinal epithelial cells exposed to tumor necrosis factor. Cancer Res 2001, 61, 8668–8675. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Yao, B.; Delikat, S.; Bayoumy, S.; Lin, X.H.; Basu, S.; McGinley, M.; Chan-Hui, P.Y.; Lichenstein, H.; Kolesnick, R. Kinase suppressor of Ras is ceramide-activated protein kinase. Cell 1997, 89, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yin, X.; Zafrullah, M.; Lee, H.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Fuks, Z.; Kolesnick, R. A ceramide-binding C1 domain mediates kinase suppressor of ras membrane translocation. Cell Physiol. Biochem 2009, 24, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bourbon, N.A.; Yun, J.; Kester, M. Ceramide directly activates protein kinase C zeta to regulate a stress-activated protein kinase signaling complex. J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 35617–35623. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lozano, J.; Berra, E.; Municio, M.M.; Diaz-Meco, M.T.; Dominguez, I.; Sanz, L.; Moscat, J. Protein kinase C zeta isoform is critical for kappa B-dependent promoter activation by sphingomyelinase. J. Biol. Chem 1994, 269, 19200–19202. [Google Scholar]
  60. Muller, G.; Ayoub, M.; Storz, P.; Rennecke, J.; Fabbro, D.; Pfizenmaier, K. PKC zeta is a molecular switch in signal transduction of TNF-alpha, bifunctionally regulated by ceramide and arachidonic acid. EMBO J 1995, 14, 1961–1969. [Google Scholar]
  61. Heinrich, M.; Neumeyer, J.; Jakob, M.; Hallas, C.; Tchikov, V.; Winoto-Morbach, S.; Wickel, M.; Schneider-Brachert, W.; Trauzold, A.; Hethke, A.; et al. Cathepsin D links TNF-induced acid sphingomyelinase to Bid-mediated caspase-9 and −3 activation. Cell Death Differ 2004, 11, 550–563. [Google Scholar]
  62. Church, L.D.; Hessler, G.; Goodall, J.E.; Rider, D.A.; Workman, C.J.; Vignali, D.A.; Bacon, P.A.; Gulbins, E.; Young, S.P. TNFR1-induced sphingomyelinase activation modulates TCR signaling by impairing store-operated Ca2+ influx. J. Leukoc. Biol 2005, 78, 266–278. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lepple-Wienhues, A.; Belka, C.; Laun, T.; Jekle, A.; Walter, B.; Wieland, U.; Welz, M.; Heil, L.; Kun, J.; Busch, G.; et al. Stimulation of CD95 (Fas) blocks T lymphocyte calcium channels through sphingomyelinase and sphingolipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 13795–13800. [Google Scholar]
  64. Szabo, I.; Gulbins, E.; Apfel, H.; Zhang, X.; Barth, P.; Busch, A.E.; Schlottmann, K.; Pongs, O.; Lang, F. Tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent suppression of a voltage-gated K+ channel in T lymphocytes upon Fas stimulation. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 20465–20469. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu, F.; Wilson, J.X. Peroxynitrite-dependent activation of protein phosphatase type 2A mediates microvascular endothelial barrier dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Res 2009, 81, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  66. Haendeler, J.; Popp, R.; Goy, C.; Tischler, V.; Zeiher, A.M.; Dimmeler, S. Cathepsin D and H2O2 stimulate degradation of thioredoxin-1: Implication for endothelial cell apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem 2005, 280, 42945–42951. [Google Scholar]
  67. Oubaha, M.; Gratton, J.P. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by atypical PKC zeta contributes to angiopoietin-1-dependent inhibition of VEGF-induced endothelial permeability in vitro. Blood 2009, 114, 3343–3351. [Google Scholar]
  68. Friedman, M.; Ryan, U.S.; Davenport, W.C.; Chaney, E.L.; Strickland, D.L.; Kwock, L. Reversible alterations in cultured pulmonary artery endothelial cell monolayer morphology and albumin permeability induced by ionizing radiation. J. Cell Physiol 1986, 129, 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gabrys, D.; Greco, O.; Patel, G.; Prise, K.M.; Tozer, G.M.; Kanthou, C. Radiation effects on the cytoskeleton of endothelial cells and endothelial monolayer permeability. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 2007, 69, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rousseau, M.; Gaugler, M.H.; Rodallec, A.; Bonnaud, S.; Paris, F.; Corre, I. RhoA GTPase regulates radiation-induced alterations in endothelial cell adhesion and migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2011, 414, 750–755. [Google Scholar]
  71. Onoda, J.M.; Kantak, S.S.; Diglio, C.A. Radiation induced endothelial cell retraction in vitro: Correlation with acute pulmonary edema. Pathol. Oncol. Res 1999, 5, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hall, A. Rho family GTPases. Biochem. Soc. Trans 2012, 40, 1378–1382. [Google Scholar]
  73. Blirando, K.; Hneino, M.; Martelly, I.; Benderitter, M.; Milliat, F.; Francois, A. Mast cells and ionizing radiation induce a synergistic expression of inflammatory genes in endothelial cells by a mechanism involving p38alpha MAP kinase and (p65) NF-kappaB activation. Radiat. Res 2012, 178, 556–567. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gupta, N.; Nodzenski, E.; Khodarev, N.N.; Yu, J.; Khorasani, L.; Beckett, M.A.; Kufe, D.W.; Weichselbaum, R.R. Angiostatin effects on endothelial cells mediated by ceramide and RhoA. EMBO Rep 2001, 2, 536–540. [Google Scholar]
  75. Brenner, B.; Koppenhoefer, U.; Weinstock, C.; Linderkamp, O.; Lang, F.; Gulbins, E. Fas- or ceramide-induced apoptosis is mediated by a Rac1-regulated activation of Jun N-terminal kinase/p38 kinases and GADD153. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 22173–22181. [Google Scholar]
  76. Del Pozo, M.A.; Alderson, N.B.; Kiosses, W.B.; Chiang, H.H.; Anderson, R.G.; Schwartz, M.A. Integrins regulate Rac targeting by internalization of membrane domains. Science 2004, 303, 839–842. [Google Scholar]
  77. Plowman, S.J.; Muncke, C.; Parton, R.G.; Hancock, J.F. H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15500–15505. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bentzen, S.M. Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: Radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 702–713. [Google Scholar]
  79. Adams, M.J.; Hardenbergh, P.H.; Constine, L.S.; Lipshultz, S.E. Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol 2003, 45, 55–75. [Google Scholar]
  80. Arenz, C. Small molecule inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase. Cell Physiol. Biochem 2010, 26, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kornhuber, J.; Tripal, P.; Reichel, M.; Muhle, C.; Rhein, C.; Muehlbacher, M.; Groemer, T.W.; Gulbins, E. Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs): A novel pharmacological group of drugs with broad clinical applications. Cell Physiol. Biochem 2010, 26, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kornhuber, J.; Muehlbacher, M.; Trapp, S.; Pechmann, S.; Friedl, A.; Reichel, M.; Muhle, C.; Terfloth, L.; Groemer, T.W.; Spitzer, G.M.; et al. Identification of novel functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase. PLoS One 2011, 6, e23852. [Google Scholar]
  83. Nahrlich, L.; Mainz, J.G.; Adams, C.; Engel, C.; Herrmann, G.; Icheva, V.; Lauer, J.; Deppisch, C.; Wirth, A.; Unger, K.; et al. Therapy of CF-patients with amitriptyline and placebo—A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb multicenter, cohort-study. Cell Physiol. Biochem 2013, 31, 505–512. [Google Scholar]
  84. Xu, J.; Yan, X.; Gao, R.; Mao, L.; Cotrim, A.P.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, C.; Baum, B.J.; Wang, S. Effect of irradiation on microvascular endothelial cells of parotid glands in the miniature pig. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 2010, 78, 897–903. [Google Scholar]
  85. Simons, M.; Annex, B.H.; Laham, R.J.; Kleiman, N.; Henry, T.; Dauerman, H.; Udelson, J.E.; Gervino, E.V.; Pike, M.; Whitehouse, M.J.; et al. Pharmacological treatment of coronary artery disease with recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2: Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Circulation 2002, 105, 788–793. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ziobro, R.; Henry, B.; Edwards, M.J.; Lentsch, A.B.; Gulbins, E. Ceramide mediates lung fibrosis in cystic fibrosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2013, 434, 705–709. [Google Scholar]
  87. Cuvillier, O.; Pirianov, G.; Kleuser, B.; Vanek, P.G.; Coso, O.A.; Gutkind, S.; Spiegel, S. Suppression of ceramide-mediated programmed cell death by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature 1996, 381, 800–803. [Google Scholar]
  88. Morita, Y.; Perez, G.I.; Paris, F.; Miranda, S.R.; Ehleiter, D.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Fuks, Z.; Xie, Z.; Reed, J.C.; Schuchman, E.H.; et al. Oocyte apoptosis is suppressed by disruption of the acid sphingomyelinase gene or by sphingosine-1-phosphate therapy. Nat. Med 2000, 6, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar]
  89. Paris, F.; Perez, G.I.; Fuks, Z.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Nguyen, H.; Bose, M.; Ilagan, A.; Hunt, P.A.; Morgan, W.F.; Tilly, J.L.; et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate preserves fertility in irradiated female mice without propagating genomic damage in offspring. Nat. Med 2002, 8, 901–902. [Google Scholar]
  90. Maceyka, M.; Payne, S.G.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine kinase, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1585, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  91. Bonnaud, S.; Niaudet, C.; Legoux, F.; Corre, I.; Delpon, G.; Saulquin, X.; Fuks, Z.; Gaugler, M.H.; Kolesnick, R.; Paris, F. Sphingosine-1-phosphate activates the AKT pathway to protect small intestines from radiation-induced endothelial apoptosis. Cancer Res 2010, 70, 9905–9915. [Google Scholar]
  92. Maceyka, M.; Harikumar, K.B.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling and its role in disease. Trends Cell Biol 2012, 22, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  93. Cho, C.H.; Kammerer, R.A.; Lee, H.J.; Yasunaga, K.; Kim, K.T.; Choi, H.H.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.H.; Park, S.K.; Lee, G.M.; et al. Designed angiopoietin-1 variant, COMP-Ang1, protects against radiation-induced endothelial cell apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5553–5558. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bonnaud, S.; Niaudet, C.; Pottier, G.; Gaugler, M.H.; Millour, J.; Barbet, J.; Sabatier, L.; Paris, F. Sphingosine-1-phosphate protects proliferating endothelial cells from ceramide-induced apoptosis but not from DNA damage-induced mitotic death. Cancer Res 2007, 67, 1803–1811. [Google Scholar]
  95. Simons, K.; Toomre, D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2000, 1, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  96. Matarazzo, S.; Quitadamo, M.C.; Mango, R.; Ciccone, S.; Novelli, G.; Biocca, S. Cholesterol-lowering drugs inhibit lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein-1 receptor function by membrane raft disruption. Mol. Pharmacol 2012, 82, 246–254. [Google Scholar]
  97. Wei, Y.M.; Li, X.; Xiong, J.; Abais, J.M.; Xia, M.; Boini, K.M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.L. Attenuation by statins of membrane raft-redox signaling in coronary arterial endothelium. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 2013, 345, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gaugler, M.H.; Vereycken-Holler, V.; Squiban, C.; Vandamme, M.; Vozenin-Brotons, M.C.; Benderitter, M. Pravastatin limits endothelial activation after irradiation and decreases the resulting inflammatory and thrombotic responses. Radiat. Res 2005, 163, 479–487. [Google Scholar]
  99. Holler, V.; Buard, V.; Gaugler, M.H.; Guipaud, O.; Baudelin, C.; Sache, A.; Perez Mdel, R.; Squiban, C.; Tamarat, R.; Milliat, F.; et al. Pravastatin limits radiation-induced vascular dysfunction in the skin. J. Invest. Dermatol 2009, 129, 1280–1291. [Google Scholar]
  100. Jain, M.K.; Ridker, P.M. Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: Clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2005, 4, 977–987. [Google Scholar]
  101. Bourgier, C.; Haydont, V.; Milliat, F.; Francois, A.; Holler, V.; Lasser, P.; Bourhis, J.; Mathe, D.; Vozenin-Brotons, M.C. Inhibition of Rho kinase modulates radiation induced fibrogenic phenotype in intestinal smooth muscle cells through alteration of the cytoskeleton and connective tissue growth factor expression. Gut 2005, 54, 336–343. [Google Scholar]
  102. Haydont, V.; Bourgier, C.; Pocard, M.; Lusinchi, A.; Aigueperse, J.; Mathe, D.; Bourhis, J.; Vozenin-Brotons, M.C. Pravastatin Inhibits the Rho/CCN2/extracellular matrix cascade in human fibrosis explants and improves radiation-induced intestinal fibrosis in rats. Clin. Cancer Res 2007, 13, 5331–5340. [Google Scholar]
  103. Moding, E.J.; Kastan, M.B.; Kirsch, D.G. Strategies for optimizing the response of cancer and normal tissues to radiation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2013, 12, 526–542. [Google Scholar]
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert