Next Article in Journal
MiR-218 Impairs Tumor Growth and Increases Chemo-Sensitivity to Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Drug Conjugates Such as Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), Immunotoxins and Immunoliposomes Challenge Daily Clinical Practice

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(12), 16046-16052; doi:10.3390/ijms131216046

Article
Isolation and Characterization of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers from the Chinese Medicinal Herb Atractylodes macrocephala (Asteraceae)
Li Zheng 1,2, Zhong-Da Shao 1,2, Zong-Chao Wang 1,2 and Cheng-Xin Fu 1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; E-Mails: zhengli0420@163.com (L.Z.); szd27112@yahoo.com.cn (Z.-D.S.); yqszd620207@zju.edu.cn (Z.-C.W.)
2
Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, Institute of Plant Sciences, and Conservation Center for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: cxfu@zju.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-571-8820-6463; Fax: +86-571-8643-2273.
Received: 13 September 2012; in revised form: 16 October 2012 / Accepted: 26 October 2012 /
Published: 28 November 2012

Abstract

: Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. (Asteraceae) is an economically important Chinese medicinal herb. In this study, 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed from A. macrocephala using the compound microsatellite marker technique. Levels of polymorphism within the 15 markers were assessed using 83 individuals from two wild and two cultivated populations in China. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 20, with an average of 9.9 alleles. Observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.083 to 1.000 and from 0.097 to 0.938, respectively. These markers will be valuable for germplasm classification and identification, as well as for assessing the genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure among wild and cultivated populations of A. macrocephala.
Keywords:
Atractylodes macrocephala; microsatellites; genetic diversity; Chinese medicinal herb

1. Introduction

Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. (Asteraceae) is a perennial herb that is endemic to several provinces in China. The dried rhizome of A. macrocephala, also known as Atractylodes Macrocephala Rhizoma (common name: “Baizhu” in Chinese and “Byakujutsu” in Japenese), is widely used in traditional herbal remedies in Asia [1,2]. It was reported as a nutrient for energy and for the treatment of dyspepsia and anorexia [3]. The essential oil of Atractylodes Macrocephala Rhizoma possesses an array of biologically active secondary compounds, including those that are gastroprotective [4], anti-inflammatory [5], anti-carcinogenic [6] and anti-microbial [7] activity according to pharmacological investigations. Due to over-exploitation and habitat destruction, A. macrocephala is now rare and threatened in the wild, and has even disappeared in many locations, e.g., Zhejiang Province [8]. Three populations QM (Qimen County, Anhui Province) [9], JL (Jiulong Mountain, Hunan Province) and MC (Micang Mountain, Shaanxi Province) are the largest known extant wild populations of the species, and they are sporadic in these regions (according to our investigation). Cultivation of the species began in Zhejiang Province during the 16th century, and has since been introduced into fifteen other provinces in China [3]. Eastern Zhejiang Province is well known for its high quality Atractylodes Macrocephala Rhizoma, while Bozhou City in Anhui Province is now the largest producer.

In the field, A. macrocephala is a perennial herb, which can reproduce sexually through cross-pollination [9]. It is cultivated as a biennial crop by seed in China and is generally harvested after the fruits ripen. However, the germplasm resources of cultivated populations of the species have degraded over time as a consequence of domestication processes. Root rot and sclerotium blight have become the main causes of yield reduction of this medicinal crop in many areas [3]. It was reported that the erosion of the genetic variability might result in reduction of the plasticity of crops to respond to changes in climate, pathogen populations, agricultural practices, or quality requirements [10]. Therefore, assessment of genetic diversity by molecular markers is important not only for crop improvement efforts, but also for efficient management and conservation of plant genetic resources. However, very little is currently known about genetic variation in wild or cultivated A. macrocephala populations [11]. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of the first set of polymorphic microsatellite markers for this species and expect these to provide a useful tool for population genetic studies.

2. Results and Discussion

A total of 91 primer pairs were designed from microsatellite sequences isolated from the microsatellite-enriched libraries. Twenty out of them successfully yielded one clear band, while the others produced multiple bands or no amplification (detected by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis). These primers were then chosen to test for polymorphism.

Eighty-three individuals of A. macrocephala (Supplementary Table S1) from two cultivated populations (Panan County, Zhejiang Province and Pingjiang County, Hunan Province) and two wild populations (Jiulong Mountain, Hunan Province and Micang Mountain, Shaanxi Province) in China were employed to test the efficiency of the locus-specific primer pairs and to characterize these microsatellite markers. Among the 20 primer pairs, 15 were polymorphic and 5 were monomorphic within all four populations of A. macrocephala, though these monomorphic markers could be potentially useful for other populations not tested [12] or other related species. The allele sizes of the 20 microsatellite loci ranged from 77 to 297 bp, and the amplification products were within the expected size range (Table 1).

As expected, amplification using these 15 primer pairs resulted in one or two alleles per individual of this diploid species, suggesting that each primer pair amplified its locus-specific microsatellite region. The number of alleles per locus (Na) ranged from 2 to 20 (mean: 9.9) among the four populations (Table 1). The observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosities (He) ranged from 0.083 to 1.000 (mean: 0.549) and from 0.097 to 0.938 (mean: 0.657), respectively (Table 2).

The mean number of the alleles per locus was 6.9 (range: 2–13), 6.5 (range: 2–12), 6.5 (range: 2–13) and 6.7 (range: 2–13) for population PA, PJ, JL and MC, respectively (Table 2). On average, the observed heterozygosities (Ho) were 0.553 (range: 0.083–0.917), 0.603 (range: 0.167–0.958), 0.497 (range: 0.100–1.000) and 0.551 (range: 0.200–0.867), respectively (Table 2). The expected heterozygosities (He) were 0.656 (range: 0.194–0.910), 0.658 (range: 0.223–0.885), 0.655 (range: 0.097–0.923) and 0.660 (range: 0.191–0.938), respectively (Table 2). For the two cultivated populations (population PA and PJ) and two wild populations (population JL and MC), the mean number of the alleles per locus was 6.7 (range: 2–13) and 6.6 (range: 2–13), respectively (Table 2). On average, the observed heterozygosities (Ho) were 0.578 (range: 0.083–0.958) and 0.524 (range: 0.100–1.000), respectively (Table 2). The expected heterozygosities (He) were 0.657 (range: 0.194–0.910) and 0.658 (range: 0.097–0.938), respectively (Table 2). The results showed that the degree of polymorphism among the four populations and between the cultivated and wild populations were not significantly different. The average number of alleles per locus and the mean expected heterozygosities for the four populations were similar. However, the mean observed heterozygosities of the two cultivated populations were higher than those of the two wild populations.

Nearly half of the fifteen analyzed loci showed significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.05) in three populations (PA, PJ and JL), while just three loci significantly deviated from the HWE expectations in the wild population MC (Table 2). The results of null allele test using MICRO-CHECKER (p < 0.001) were similar to the test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Specifically, null alleles may be present at six loci in population PA (Am4, Am5, Am7, Am11, Am13 and Am15), four loci in population PJ (Am5, Am7, Am11 and Am15), four loci in population JL (Am7, Am11, Am14 and Am15) and two loci in population MC (Am12 and Am15). The departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, most of which were caused by heterozygote deficiency, are likely to be due to the presence of null alleles (Am7, Am11 and Am15). Alternatively, inbreeding in the cultivated populations and genetic drift among small, fragmented wild populations may explain our observations. Two pairs of loci in population PA (Am4 & Am7, Am2 & Am4) and two pairs in population PJ (Am2 & Am4, Am9 & Am10) were found to have significant LD (p < 0.01), while no significant LD was observed in any loci pairs in the two wild populations. Thus, LD is likely due to different population structure rather than to physical linkage of the markers.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Isolation of Microsatellite Markers

The compound microsatellite marker technique based on a dual-suppression-PCR method was used to develop microsatellite markers for A. macrocephala in this study [13]. Two individuals from population PA (Supplementary Table S1) were employed to construct the microsatelite-enriched libraries. Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel-dried leaf material using the modified CTAB method by Doyle [14]. The microsatellite-enriched libraries were constructed following Zhai et al. [15] except that we used ca. 500 ng of total genomic DNA and the HaeIII and SspI (Takara) blunt-end restriction enzymes for both individuals. Fragments flanked by a microsatellite at one end were amplified from both the HaeIII and SspI DNA libraries, and then the fragments whose size were between 400 and 1000 bp were purified and ligated into PMD18-T vector (Takara), and subsequently transformed into DH5α competent cells (Takara) as described by Yuan et al. [16].

A total of 223 positive clones were obtained and sequenced on an ABI Prism 3730 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). One hundred and ninety-four sequences were found to contain (AC)6(AG)n or (TC)6(AC)n compound SSR motifs, of which ninety-one possessed unique sequences with sufficient flanking regions for designing specific primers. A specific primer (IP1) was designed using Primer Premier Version 5.0 [17]. Because there might be hundreds of binding sites of the compound SSR primer in the genome, the specificity of the primer pairs mostly depended on IP1. Therefore, IP1 was designed using the following criteria: (1) primer size between 18 and 22 bp in length; (2) amplicon size between 80 and 300 bp; (3) GC content between 35% and 65%; (4) base runs no more than four, especially no more than three base runs for G or C; and (5) the most important, Tm value of IP1 was lower than the compound SSR primer and within 2 °C, because primer with lower Tm value normally determines the specificity of the primer pairs. Finally, the primer pair with highest score given by Primer Premier was chosen.

All PCR amplifications were performed in a 15 μL reaction mixture containing 50–75 ng of genomic DNA, 0.75 U of Taq polymerase (Takara), 1.5 μL of 10 × PCR buffer with MgCl2, 1.2 μL of dNTPs (2.5 mM each), 0.1 μL bovine serum albumin (BSA, Takara), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM). PCR amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at the optimized annealing temperature (Table 1), 30 s of elongation at 72 °C; ending with a 5 min extension at 72 °C. Fragment analysis was performed on a MegaBACE 1000 autosequencer (GE Healthcare Biosciences), and alleles were scored using the GeneMaker Software version 1.97 (SoftGenetics) as described by Yuan et al. [16].

3.2. Data Analysis

The number of observed alleles per locus (Na), as well as observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosities, were calculated by CERVUS version 3.0.3 [18]. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) between all pairs of polymorphic loci were analyzed using GENEPOP version 4.0.7 [19]. The presence of null alleles at each locus was tested using MICRO-CHECKER version 2.2.3 [20].

4. Conclusions

The 15 novel microsatellite markers that we have developed for A. macrocephala showed high polymorphism among and within four populations of A. macrocephala. Thus, these markers are suitable for population genetics studies of this medicinal plant. In our ongoing research, we are applying them to investigate genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure over both cultivated and wild populations of this important medicinal species. Furthermore, we expect that these markers will facilitate future studies on the origin and evolutionary history of cultivated populations, as well as on the efficient conservation and sustainable exploitation of the A. macrocephala germplasms.

Supplementary Information

ijms-13-16046-s001.pdf

Acknowledgments

We are especially grateful to AJ Harris (Oklahoma State University, USA) for her useful comments on this manuscript. This research was supported by the Key Breeding Project of Zhejiang Province (No.2012C12912) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30830011).

References

  1. Shi, Y.Y.; Guan, S.H.; Tang, R.N.; Tao, S.J.; Guo, D.A. Simultaneous determination of four sesquiterpenoids in Atractylodes macrocephala Rhizoma by GC-FID: Optimisation of an ultrasound-assisted extraction by central composite design. Phytochem. Anal 2012, 23, 408–414. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shiba, M.; Kondo, K.; Miki, E.; Yamaji, H.; Morota, T.; Terabayashi, S.; Takeda, S.; Miyamoto, K.; Aburada, M. Identification of medicinal Atractylodes based on ITS sequences of nrDNA. Biol. Pharm. Bull 2006, 29, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pharmacopoeia Commission of People’s Republic of China. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese), 2010 ed.; China Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 95–96.
  4. Wang, K.T.; Chen, L.G.; Wu, C.H.; Chang, C.C.; Wang, C.C. Gastroprotective activity of atractylenolide III from Atractylodes ovata on ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in vitro and in vivo. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 2010, 62, 381–388. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, C.H.; Duan, H.J.; He, L.C. Inhibitory effect of atractylenolide I on angiogenesis in chronic inflammation in vivo and in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2009, 612, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kang, T.H.; Bang, J.Y.; Kim, M.H.; Kang, I.C.; Kim, H.M.; Jeong, H.J. Atractylenolide III a sesquiterpenoid, induces apoptosis in human lung carcinoma A549 cells via mitochondria-mediated death pathway. Food. Chem. Toxicol 2011, 49, 514–519. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim, H.K.; Yun, Y.K.; Ahn, Y.J. Toxicity of atractylon and atractylenolide III identified in Atractylodes ovata rhizome to Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. J. Agric. Food. Chem 2007, 55, 6027–6031. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zou, X.X. A pharmacophylogenetic study of Atractylodes DC (in Chinese). In Ph.D. thesis; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, H.C.; Hu, C.Y.; Hu, X.Q.; Chen, A.Z. The biological property and planting technology of Atractylodes macrocephala (in Chinese). Forest Prod. China 2005, 2, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Manifesto, M.M.; Schlatter, A.R.; Hopp, H.E.; Suarez, E.Y.; Dubcovsky, J. Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers. Crop. Sci 2001, 41, 682–690. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Y.H.; Chen, B.L.; Li, P.; Qiu, Y.X.; Fu, C.X. Studies on the genetic diversity of cultivated populations of Atractylodes macrocephala by ISSR (in Chinese). China J. Chin. Mater. Med 2008, 33, 2756–2760. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, X.H.; Wan, Y.; Qi, Z.C.; Qiu, Y.X.; Fu, C.X. Isolation of compound microsatellite markers for the common Mediterranean shrub Smilax aspera (Smilacaceae). Am. J. Bot 2011, 98, e64–e66. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lian, C.L.; Wadud, M.A.; Geng, Q.; Shimatani, K.; Hogetsu, T. An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers. J. Plant Res 2006, 119, 415–417. [Google Scholar]
  14. Doyle, J.J. DNA Protocols for Plants-CTAB Total DNA Isolation. In Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy; Hewittand, G.M., Johnston, A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1991; pp. 283–293. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhai, S.N.; Yan, X.L.; Nakamura, K.; Mishima, M.; Qiu, Y.X. Isolation of compound microsatelite markers for the endangered plant Neolitsea sericea (Lauraceae). Am. J. Bot 2010, 97, e139–e141. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuan, N.; Sun, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Qiu, Y.X. Development of microsatellite markers in heterostylous Hedyotis chrysotricha (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot 2012, 99, e43–e45. [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke, K.R.; Gorley, R.N. Primer v5: User Manual/Tutorial; Primer-E Ltd: Plymouth, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kallnowski, S.T.; Taper, M.L.; Marshall, T.C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol 2007, 16, 1099–1106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rousset, F. Genepop’007: A complete re-implementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res 2008, 8, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Oosterhout, C.; Hutchinson, W.F.; Wills, D.P.M.; Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 536–538. [Google Scholar]
Table Table 1. Characteristics of 20 compound microsatellite loci developed for Atractylodes macrocephala.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Characteristics of 20 compound microsatellite loci developed for Atractylodes macrocephala.
LocusRepeat motifPrimer sequence (5′ to 3′)Ta(°C)Size range (bp)NaGenBank Accesion no.
Am1(AC)6(AG)7F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: TTACCACGATGAGCAAAAC
5477–895JX242500
Am2(AC)6(AG)5GG(AG)4F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: CTATTGCCACCTTCTTGC
52225–27518JX242501
Am3(AC)6(AG)6F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: TATCGGGTACATCAGAGCA
50166–1722JX242502
Am4(TC)6(AC)8AT(AC)2F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: ATACGCAAAACTCGAACC
58123–14912JX242503
Am5(TC)6(AC)8AT(AC)2F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: AAGGTGGAGCTAGGAAATC
50159–1735JX242504
Am6(TC)6(AC)9ATACF: (TC)6(AC)5
R: TGGAATCGAATCCCTAAA
5290–1067JX242505
Am7(TC)6(AC)11AT(AC)12F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: TTGAACCCTGTTGACCATA
56232–26416JX242506
Am8(TC)6(AC)5AT(AC)4F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: GGTAGTAGAACCCAAGCAA
54163–1895JX242507
Am9(TC)6(AC)19F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: CAGAAATATCGGAACTCCTT
52206–24218JX242508
Am10(TC)6(AC)7F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: GGCAGCCATTACAACTCA
5683–896JX242509
Am11(TC)6(AC)14TC(AC)2F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: TATCCTTACTCGGACATTACA
50260–29012JX242510
Am12(TC)6(AC)10F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: TCGAAATTCTTACCGTCAA
54251–29720JX242511
Am13(TC)6(AC)5F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: ACGTTATCGTCCGAAATG
52154–1604JX242512
Am14(TC)6(AC)5(AT)3F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: GGTAGTGGCTATTGGGACT
52197–1992JX242513
Am15(TC)6(AC)10AT(AC)5F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: CTATGTTAGAAGGCTGGTGTT
50205–24117JX242514
Am16(AC)6(AG)5F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: CCGTATCATGGGAGGTAA
521321JX964787
Am17(AC)6(AG)5F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: TTACCTTTGAGTTCTTTACACC
54851JX964788
Am18(AC)6(AG)5F: (AC)6(AG)5
R: CTATACCCACCAAGTCACAA
501941JX964789
Am19(TC)6(AC)7F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: CCAAGTAGGGTCCAGATTC
561761JX964790
Am20(TC)6(AC)5F: (TC)6(AC)5
R: AAAGCGGAATATGGTTTC
561651JX964791

Note: F = forward primer; R = reverse primer; Ta = annealing temperature; Na = number of alleles per locus.

Table Table 2. Results of initial primer screening in four populations of Atractylodes macrocephala.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Results of initial primer screening in four populations of Atractylodes macrocephala.
LocusPopulation PA( N = 24 )Population PJ( N = 24 )Population JL (N = 20 )Population MC(N = 15 )

NaHoHeNaHoHeNaHoHeNaHoHe
Am140.3330.472 n.s.40.3750.332 n.s.30.3000.273 n.s.30.5330.577 n.s.
Am2120.7920.846 n.s.110.8750.841 **131.0000.923 n.s.110.6670.899 n.s.
Am320.7500.511 *20.7920.511 *20.3500.481 n.s.20.5330.497 n.s.
Am480.4170.703 ***90.9170.847 n.s.70.7000.817 n.s.100.8000.853 n.s.
Am540.2920.502 *50.1670.428 ***30.3500.606 *30.3330.297 n.s.
Am620.5420.403 n.s.50.6670.569 n.s.60.7000.728 n.s.40.6000.646 n.s.
Am7120.6250.878 ***90.5830.846 ***100.5500.869 ***100.6670.814 n.s.
Am850.6250.738 *50.3750.590 **30.3000.456 *50.3330.361 n.s.
Am9120.8750.847 n.s.100.9580.818 n.s.90.8000.864 n.s.120.8670.910 n.s.
Am1040.7500.724 n.s.40.9170.766 n.s.50.8000.792 n.s.50.6000.706 n.s.
Am11100.5000.854 ***70.5420.811 **80.3000.864 ***60.6000.823 *
Am12110.9170.882 n.s.120.7920.869 n.s.130.7500.904 *130.6670.938 *
Am1330.0830.194 *40.3330.535 *20.1000.097 n.s.30.2000.191 n.s.
Am1420.3330.383 n.s.20.2500.223 n.s.20.1500.296 *20.4000.460 n.s.
Am15130.4580.910 ***90.2920.885 ***110.3000.859 ***120.4670.924 ***
Mean6.90.5530.6566.50.6030.6586.50.4970.6556.70.5510.660

Note: N = sample size for each population; Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; Na = number of alleles per locus; Population PA = Panan population; Population PJ = Pingjiang population; Population JL = Jiulong population; Population MC = Micang population. *, ** and ***, Significant departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively; n.s. = not significant.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert