Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Force Fields and Temperatures on the Structural Character of Abeta (12–28) Peptide in Aqueous Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study Using Different Infrared Zones of the Solventless Activation of Organic Reactions
Previous Article in Journal
Cell-Biomaterial Mechanical Interaction in the Framework of Tissue Engineering: Insights, Computational Modeling and Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid and Green Analytical Method for the Determination of Quinoline Alkaloids from Cinchona succirubra Based on Microwave-Integrated Extraction and Leaching (MIEL) Prior to High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12(11), 8245-8258; doi:10.3390/ijms12118245

Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant

, 2,†
, 3
, 3,4,* , 5
, 1
, 3
, 6
, 3
 and 3
Received: 11 October 2011 / Revised: 4 November 2011 / Accepted: 9 November 2011 / Published: 21 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Green Chemistry and Sustainable Chemistry 2011)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [171 KB, updated 19 June 2014; original version uploaded 19 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: The separation of mercury ions from artificially contaminated water by the foam fractionation process using a biosurfactant (surfactin) and chemical surfactants (SDS and Tween-80) was investigated in this study. Parameters such as surfactant and mercury concentration, pH, foam volume, and digestion time were varied and their effects on the efficiency of mercury removal were investigated. The recovery efficiency of mercury ions was highly sensitive to the concentration of the surfactant. The highest mercury ion recovery by surfactin was obtained using a surfactin concentration of 10 × CMC, while recovery using SDS required < 10 × CMC and Tween-80 >10 × CMC. However, the enrichment of mercury ions in the foam was superior with surfactin, the mercury enrichment value corresponding to the highest metal recovery (10.4%) by surfactin being 1.53. Dilute solutions (2-mg L−1 Hg2+) resulted in better separation (36.4%), while concentrated solutions (100 mg L−1) enabled only a 2.3% recovery using surfactin. An increase in the digestion time of the metal solution with surfactin yielded better separation as compared with a freshly-prepared solution, and an increase in the airflow rate increased bubble production, resulting in higher metal recovery but low enrichment. Basic solutions yielded higher mercury separation as compared with acidic solutions due to the precipitation of surfactin under acidic conditions.
Keywords: mercury removal; foam fractionation; biosurfactant; Surfactin mercury removal; foam fractionation; biosurfactant; Surfactin
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, H.-R.; Chen, C.-C.; Reddy, A.S.; Chen, C.-Y.; Li, W.R.; Tseng, M.-J.; Liu, H.-T.; Pan, W.; Maity, J.P.; Atla, S.B. Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 8245-8258.

AMA Style

Chen H-R, Chen C-C, Reddy AS, Chen C-Y, Li WR, Tseng M-J, Liu H-T, Pan W, Maity JP, Atla SB. Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011; 12(11):8245-8258.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Hau-Ren; Chen, Chien-Cheng; Reddy, A. Satyanarayana; Chen, Chien-Yen; Li, Wun Rong; Tseng, Min-Jen; Liu, Hung-Tsan; Pan, Wei; Maity, Jyoti Prakash; Atla, Shashi B. 2011. "Removal of Mercury by Foam Fractionation Using Surfactin, a Biosurfactant." Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, no. 11: 8245-8258.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert