Next Article in Journal
Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles: Assessment of Their Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity and Study of Capping Proteins
Next Article in Special Issue
Spectroscopic Study on Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm in the Presence of the Aptamer-DNA Scaffolded Silver Nanoclusters
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Chemometric Problems in Food Analysis using Non-Linear Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Chemiluminescent Method for the Detection of H2O2 and Glucose Based on Intrinsic Peroxidase-Like Activity of WS2 Quantum Dots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Micro RNA Sensing with Green Emitting Silver Nanoclusters

by
Liam E. Yourston
and
Alexey V. Krasnoslobodtsev
*
Department of Physics, University of Nebraska Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE 68182, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(13), 3026; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133026
Submission received: 31 May 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 30 June 2020 / Published: 2 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Fluorescent Metal Nanoclusters as Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Micro RNA (miR) are regulatory non-coding RNA molecules, which contain a small number of nucleotides ~18–28 nt. There are many various miR sequences found in plants and animals that perform important functions in developmental, metabolic, and disease processes. miRs can bind to complementary sequences within mRNA molecules thus silencing mRNA. Other functions include cardiovascular and neural development, stem cell differentiation, apoptosis, and tumors. In tumors, some miRs can function as oncogenes, others as tumor suppressors. Levels of certain miR molecules reflect cellular events, both normal and pathological. Therefore, miR molecules can be used as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. One of these promising molecules is miR-21, which can serve as a biomarker with high potential for early diagnosis of various types of cancer. Here, we present a novel design of miR detection and demonstrate its efficacy on miR-21. The design employs emissive properties of DNA-silver nanoclusters (DNA/AgNC). The detection probe is designed as a hairpin DNA structure with one side of the stem complimentary to miR molecule. The binding of target miR-21 opens the hairpin structure, dramatically modulating emissive properties of AgNC hosted by the C12 loop of the hairpin. “Red” fluorescence of the DNA/AgNC probe is diminished in the presence of the target miR. At the same time, “green” fluorescence is activated and its intensity increases several-fold. The increase in intensity of “green” fluorescence is strong enough to detect the presence of miR-21. The intensity change follows the concentration dependence of the target miR present in a sample, which provides the basis of developing a new, simple probe for miR detection. The detection strategy is specific, as demonstrated using the response of the DNA/AgNC probe towards the scrambled miR-21 sequence and miR-25 molecule. Additionally, the design reported here is very sensitive with an estimated detection limit at ~1 picomole of miR-21.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Silver nanoclusters (AgNC) are a novel class of nanomaterials that are only a few atoms in size. Cytosine-rich nucleic acid sequences template and stabilize silver nanoclusters limiting their size and modifying their electronic properties. The continuous density of states, typical for metal structures, breaks up into discrete energy levels in the nanoclusters. The nanoclusters resemble molecular-like behavior with strong fluorescence observed in the wide range of the spectrum, from UV to visible to near IR [1,2]. AgNCs are more stable in photobleaching than widely used organic dyes, quantum dots, or fluorescent proteins [3,4,5]. These properties make AgNCs suitable for a plethora of practical applications including luminescent labelling, biological imaging, sensing, and catalysis [6,7,8]. The high sensitivity of emissive properties of the AgNCs to subtle changes in their environment have triggered an exploration of practical use of the AgNCs in sensing applications. Since the precise knowledge of metal nanocluster photophysics is still lacking, further understanding of the energy transfer mechanism when utilizing metal nanoclusters is expected to result in a broader interest of utilizing nanoclusters in biosensing applications [9].
The use of DNA-templated silver nanoclusters has been proposed for the detection of a variety of species based on fluorescence quenching or fluorescence enhancement. For example, sulfide S2- ions have been effectively detected [10]. DNA-templated silver nanoclusters have been shown to be responsive to the presence of various metal ions. For example, the sensing of Cu2+ [11,12,13] was demonstrated with the use of silver nanoclusters hosted in the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) network [14] or glutathione (GSH) ligand [15], Hg2+ was detected with DNA/AgNCs [16,17,18,19,20]. The sensitivity of AgNCs to ions has also been exploited in the construction of logic gates [21,22]. A variety of already-developed approaches indicate how versatile the use of AgNCs can be for the detection of a single analyte.
Not only inorganic analytes can be sensed with silver nanoclusters, but also the detection of biomolecules has been explored by several groups. Among examples of biomolecular detection are gene detection [23], protein detection [24,25,26], detection of specific nucleic acid sequences [27,28,29], and cellular labeling [30,31]. Recently, advanced detection procedures have also been incorporated with the use of AgNCs such as the multiplexed sensing capability of several genes [32] or surface plasmon enhanced energy transfer (SPEET) between AgNCs and AuNP for protein [33] or DNA [34] detection.
The detection of miR molecules represents an enormous interest, owing to their important role in many processes. miR molecules are regulatory non-coding small sequences comprising a limited number of nucleotides ranging between ~18–28 nt. miR molecules play important roles in developmental, metabolic, and disease processes. Of particular interest is the role miR play in tumors. Some miR molecules can function as oncogenes, others as tumor suppressors [35]. Dysregulation and the extent at which miR molecules are present in cells can serve as a disease fingerprint. Since levels of certain miRs reflect pathological cellular events, these miR molecules can be used as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. One of such promising molecules is miR-21 which is a representative oncogenic miR so called “onco-miR”. miR-21 is a 22 nucleotides-long molecule that drives cancer development by targeting numerous tumor suppressor genes associated with proliferation, apoptosis and invasion including PTEN [36], PDCD4 [37,38], and TPM1 [39]. miR-21 is overexpressed in various types of tumors. The following are examples of confirmed roles of the miR-21 in tumors: breast [40], lung [41], ovarian [42], cervical [43,44], colon [38], brain [45,46], liver [47,48], prostate [49], and pancreatic cancer [50,51]. Dysregulation of miR-21 makes it a very good candidate as a biomarker for developing tools for the early diagnosis and prognosis of cancers. More importantly, as recent evidence suggests, miR-21 is not only present in tissues but also in body fluids, such as serum [52,53], saliva [54,55], plasma [46,56,57], gastric juice [58,59], sputum [60,61], and cerebrospinal fluid [62,63,64]. Therefore, by examining body fluids and the levels of miR-21, it may be possible to differentiate cancer patients from healthy individuals and detect cancer at early stages dependent on the diagnostic potential of miR-21 as a biomarker. Thus, new methods for the rapid and sensitive detection of miRs are of paramount importance in the field of cancer diagnostics.
Recently, several designs utilizing DNA-based AgNCs have been exploited for the detection of various miR sequences [27,28,29,65]. The detection strategy for miR molecules is primarily based on a clever construction of the AgNC probe which involves two separate domains: the recognition domain and the signaling domain. The signaling domain templates and stabilizes AgNCs while the recognition domain specifically binds to biomolecules needed to be detected: specific gene sequences, protein aptamers, and nucleic acid sequences such as miR. The two domains work concertedly due to the high sensitivity of AgNCs to changes in the environment. It is important for the sensitivity of detection that the signaling domain responds to slight variations in the environment upon analyte binding to the recognition domain. Signal changes can be positive when fluorescence is enhanced due to analyte binding or negative when fluorescence is quenched. The ability of the AgNCs to detect short fragments of nucleic acid molecules stems from convenient natural integration of AgNCs into nucleic acid-based nano-assemblies [2]. We dedicated this current study to demonstrating the detection strategy for miR sequences in general and miR-21 in particular. Here, we present a novel type of miR detection in cases where signaling modality is due to the activation of dark fluorescence states, which remain silent in the absence of a target analyte but become activated when the analyte is present. We evaluated the response of a hairpin-based biosensor to the presence of miR-21 in a sample. The sensor design contained a C12 loop that effectively templated AgNCs with a bright “red” emission and high stability. In the presence of miR-21 molecules, a new “green” emission appears and its intensity increases in an miR-21 concentration-dependent manner. The novelty of the design presented here exploits activation of the “green” emissive states only due to specific binding of the miR sequence, providing the selective fluorescence contrast enhancement mechanism of miR detection. While the major goal of this work was to demonstrate the feasibility of detection and evaluate the sensitivity of the loop-templated fluorescent AgNC towards a particular miR sequence, miR-21, the results of this study and the design presented can easily be generalized for other miR sequences.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Design of Sensing AgNC DNA Template

There is a variety of DNA sequences that template and stabilize silver nanoclusters (reviewed in [66]). Recently, it has been proposed that the identification of specific genome sequences can be made based on the properties of AgNC that these sequences template [67]. The cytosine-rich sequences are the most common nucleic acid sequences used in the synthesis of AgNC due to the very high affinity of cytosines to silver cations [68,69]. Our primary goal is to be able to change optical properties of silver nanoclusters upon binding of a short RNA sequence of interest corresponding to a specific type of miR.
A DNA/AgNC probe was designed as a hairpin template to contain two domains. One domain is a cytosine rich loop to host AgNCs. The second domain is a stem of the hairpin which is partly complementary to target miR molecule. Figure 1A schematically shows our design. The designed sequence has a double-stranded stem and carries the nanocluster nucleating C12 loop. One side of the stem sequence is a full-length complementary sequence to miR-21. In the presence of miR-21, the longer side of the design binds miR-21 due to perfect complementarity of the two sequences. The other side of the stem is a seven-base-long segment and is complementary to the bases of the stem right next to the C12 loop (TAGCTTA). Thermodynamic calculations suggest that the stability of the full-length, 22 bp compliment (∆G = −35.09 kcal/mole) is larger than stability of the 7 bp stem duplex (∆G = −2.92 kcal/mole). Due to such differences in thermodynamic stability of these two duplexes, the operation of the designed miR probe is expected to optimally proceed at room temperature. The design of the stem, length and the sequence can be made more or less stable depending on the probed miR sequence—rendering the proposed design flexible and suitable for a variety of different sequences.

2.2. The Formation of Silver Nanoclusters within the C12 Loop of the DNA-miR21-Probe

The formation of fluorescent silver nanoclusters was templated by the C12 loop of the C12-loop-miR21-probe, which assumes a hairpin structure (Figure 1A). The AgNC formation is manifested by the observable changes in solution. Within just a few hours after the addition of AgNO3 and sodium borohydride as reducing agent to the C12-loop-miR21-probe, the solution loses transparency and acquires a clear reddish tint. These changes can be observed even with the naked eye but become more apparent when the sample is placed under a UV trans-illuminator (Figure 1B). The samples glow red under these conditions. Figure 1C shows an emission spectrum of the sample with constant single excitation at 260 nm mimicking excitation into DNA bases [2]. As expected, the spectrum is dominated by the red emission with an apparent maximum at λR = 600 nm. Although the major peak is situated at λMAX = 600 nm, one can notice a shoulder at lower wavelengths that might suggest the presence of “green” fluorescence as well. We have previously observed both types of emitters “red” and “green” coexisting with C12 templating sequences [2], although it appears that the C12-loop of the hairpin primarily gives rise to “red” emitters. Figure 1D shows an excitation spectrum of the red emission, λR = 600 nm. The excitation spectrum reveals that the red fluorescence can be excited in the visible with broad excitation peak at λEXC = 510–590 nm range. It is also broadly excited throughout the UV region, covering an astonishing range of 220–315 nm.

2.3. Optical Properties of AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-Probe under UV and Visible Excitation

We further characterized the properties of AgNC templated with DNA-miR21-probe by employing fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMS). The optical response and the excitation/emission relationship of AgNCs has proven to be a little complicated, hence a better way to represent such responses is through measuring the entire excitation/emission matrix spanning a wide range of wavelengths presented as 2D contour maps [2,70,71].
Figure 2A shows the EEM map for the AgNCs templated on C12-loop-miR21-probe with excitation in the range of 220–370 nm while recording the entire emission spectrum in the UV and visible spanning 270–750 nm wavelengths (UV/UV-Vis EEM). Similar to the spectrum with single wavelength of excitation shown in Figure 1C, the red emission dominates the map with the most intense fluorescence at 600 nm. “Red” fluorescence is excited broadly throughout the entire UVC (220–280 nm) and UVB (280–310 nm) regions. There is also detectable amount of “green” fluorescence in the emission range of wavelengths between 500–600 nm. The emission is not excited continuously throughout these regions for both “green” and “red” species but rather with a set of wavelengths: 225, 240, 260, and 274 nm, determined as maxima of the Gaussian fits. Regardless of color, the emission of AgNCs in the visible is universally excited via the DNA bases which agrees well with previously published data [72] and our own observations [2]. Previous studies found that visible emission of DNA templated AgNCs can be excited by both direct excitation into visible band and by UV light into absorption peak of DNA nucleobases [2,69,73]. The tight association of silver nanoclusters with DNA templating bases allows for optical interactions between the DNA template and AgNCs [72]. Therefore, in addition to natural integration of the template into a detection probe design, the nucleobases’ targeted excitation of normal emission bands of AgNCs is another valuable feature of the DNA template.
Next, we measured excitation/emission map for the AgNCs templated on the C12-loop-miR21-probe with excitation in the visible range between 370 nm and 700 nm while also recording the visible emission spectrum spanning 450–750 nm wavelengths (Vis/Vis EEM), shown in Figure 2B. The Vis/Vis EEM probes optical properties of the nanoclusters in general, despite their association with the bases. This is in contrast to UV/UV-Vis EEM, which reveals properties of the AgNCs tightly associated with the nucleobases. It is clear that the “red” emission is dominant in the Vis/Vis EEM. The red emission appears as diagonally stretched peak extending from λEM = ~580 nm to λEM = ~680 nm. The diagonal pattern of the “red” emission is related to the progressive shift of the maximum wavelength to the red as the excitation wavelength increases. Such bathochromic shifting in the emission band is most likely associated with the Red-Edge Excitation Shift (REES) effect [74]. This phenomenon has been previously observed for polar fluorophores in “rigid” solutions [75,76,77]. We hypothesize that such an effect in AgNC indicates a “rigid” nature of clusters, preventing fast randomization of the local environment. The randomization process is not fast enough to allow for efficient relaxation of the excited state of the cluster to the lowest possible level. The emission is forced from the higher levels of the excited singlet state resulting in the shift of emission to the red with increasing excitation energy [74].
In general, we find that “green” and “red” emissions are not equivalent for the excitation for both UV and visible. Despite its detectable intensity when excited in UV, the “green” emission is silent when excitation is performed in the visible range of wavelengths. Additionally, the “red” peak appears at a different maximum wavelength when compared to UV excitation. Although with complex excitation pattern, UV excitation results in a single maximum of emission λRED-MAX = 600 nm (λEXCEM = 225/600 nm, λEXCEM = 240/600 nm, λEXCEM = 260/600 nm, λEXCEM = 274/600 nm). The fluorescence under visible excitation features several peaks. While the maximum of emission starts at 600 nm with a small peak λEXCEM = 535/600 nm, it progressively shifts to red and outlines a complex de-excitation pattern for the red emission. The preferred emission is observed at λEXCEM = 570/628 nm and highlights the differences between UV and visible excitation, while both show a complex pattern, UV does not have REES while visible excitation shows obvious REES. This is similar to what we observed before for the red emission of many C12 templated AgNCs, and indicates a complex nature of the energy landscape as well as an assortment of de-excitation routes of the AgNC emissive states.

2.4. Detection of miRNA-21 with “Green” AgNCs

Close proximity of the bases coordinating the AgNCs affect electronic properties and alter photophysics—both emission and excitation, as well as quantum yield and fluorescence lifetime [78]. While it is still not fully understood how exactly templating and non-templating sequences affect the photophysics of AgNCs, it is nonetheless possible to utilize these properties for some practical applications. The sensitivity of optical properties of AgNCs to their environment can be used to detect miR sequences. We employed the C12-loop-miR21-probe for detecting the presence of miR-21 molecule added to the sample.
To assess the feasibility to detect and quantitatively report on the presence of miR molecules, we measured the EEM spectra for a series of samples with varying concentrations of target miR-21 molecules. Figure 3 shows the response of the AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-probe emission to addition of molar equivalents of miR-21 molecules to C12-loop-miR21-probe in the following order 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.00 with a 25% incremental increase in the molar ratio (MmiR21/MAgNC). The results showed that the optical response of the AgNCs/DNA-probe is sensitive to the presence of the miR-21 molecule in a concentration-dependent manner. The original red emission does not change dramatically as indicated by the same pattern with the fine structure of subtle peaks. Perhaps the only thing that changes is the relative intensity of the peaks. While the entire cluster of “red” emission peaks shows a similar intensity regardless of how much of the miR-21 target molecule is added, it appears that satellite peaks on the green edge of the red cluster become intensified when miR-21 is added to the C12-loop-miR21-probe.
The most dramatic change, however, is observed in the “green” region of emission spectra, at λEM = 565 nm. The intensity of the “green” emission increases with increased concentration of miR-21 suggesting that the high sensitivity of this type of AgNC is attributable to changes due to the presence of an analyte sequence. As it turns out, the “green” emission is also complex and represents itself as a cluster of “green” peaks with all the peaks in the cluster increasing similarly in intensity with the increase of the analyte concentration. Therefore, it is possible to utilize the increase in fluorescence intensity as a read-out strategy for the detection and quantitative analysis of miR-21. Figure 4A shows the comparative graph of fluorescence spectra all excited at λEXC = 570 nm, demonstrating that the “red” emission has very poor responsive changes to various concentrations of miR-21. The maximum of the emission spectrum slightly shifts and only marginally drops when the miR-21-equivalent concentration is changed from 0 to 0.25 and then to 0.5, and after that it stays almost the same at high molar equivalents of miR-21 added. Such behaviour invalidates the possibility of using “red” emission as a read-out signal for the quantitative analysis of miR-21. On the other hand, steep changes in intensity of “green” fluorescence may be, in fact, considered as a detection read-out method. Indeed, as shown in Figure 4B, the maximum intensity of the peak plotted versus the concentration of added miR-21 exhibits a sigmoidal behaviour: the larger the amount of added analyte sequence, the larger the intensity of “green” fluorescence.
Such sigmoidal dependence between the signal intensity and analyte concentration can be described statistically by utilizing the four-parameter logistic (4PL) curve for calculating the analytical limit of detection (LOD) of the method [79,80]. In the absence of an exact binding model, we used a similar approach with the 4PL, Equation (1), to obtain characteristic parameters of our detection method:
I = I B + I M A X I B   1 + ( 10 log ( E C 50 % ) C o n c ) H C
Here, IMAX and IB are signal intensity value at the top of the curve and at the bottom respectively, log(EC50%) is the signal intensity value that produces 50% signal response, and HC is the slope-like parameter often referred to as the Hill coefficient [79,80]. The limit of detection (LOD) was then calculated based on the value of three times the standard deviation of the blank value, 3σblank, obtained from the fit. Based on such estimate, the LOD of the method results in 1.6 × 10−6 M. Similar results can also be obtained using simple 3:1 signal to noise ratio considerations amounting to micromolar detectible concentration of the analyte. If we further consider that our sample volume is 60 microliters, the estimate suggests the detection limit of the method to be just below one picomole of the target miR-21 molecule. The limit of detection could be lowered using previously suggested sensitive laser spectroscopic methods [81]. Clearly, individual AgNCs can be observed using Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, providing the excitation line is carefully chosen to match the appropriate excitation band of AgNCs. Other optimization protocols for the volumetric detection as in our study include running the assay at a lower concentration with voltage boost on the photomultiplying tube (PMT) of the detector, or other dedicated specific hardware enhancements may be considered. Indeed, we have previously shown that “green” fluorescence peaks can be analyzed in detail with PMT voltage enhancements [71]. Figure S1 shows a detailed analysis of the “green” emission region, revealing the cluster of green fluorescence peaks with at least two excitation-emission maxima: λEXCEM = 460/565 nm and λEXCEM = 480/565 nm. The fine structure of the “green” cluster of peaks indicates two major routes for the excitation of the “green” emission at λEM = 565 nm. We chose to follow the emission peak at λEXCEM = 480/565 nm, as it displays a larger change in intensity with the concentration of added miR-21 than the emission peak at λEXCEM = 460/565 nm. Figure S1 shows the comparative analysis of both peaks as well as their optical response to the added target miR-21. Although the λEXCEM = 480/565 nm outperforms λEXCEM = 460/565 nm peak for the design we used in this study, we can speculate that for some miR target sequences and other loop designs, the λEXCEM = 460/565 nm peak may be the dominant de-excitation route [71]. In that case, this latter peak must be chosen as the default detection read-out signal.
The changes in fluorescence of AgNCs when the C12-loop-miR21-probe binds the miR-21 target sequence are very noticeable. These changes are not restricted to the visible range of emission wavelengths only. Figure S2 shows changes taking place upon addition of miR-21 in the UV/UV range (220–300 nm/270–400 nm). The UV emission that is excited in UV shows a gradual increase in intensity with well-separated peaks. Therefore, another alternative to using the “green” emission is to monitor changes of fluorescence that appear in the UV region. Alternative detection strategies are described in detail in the Supplementary Materials. Our results show that the UV emissive states also can be used for the detection of miR sequences. However, the detailed quantitative analysis of miR quantities present in a sample are better analyzed using “green” emissive states, as they greatly outperform “UV” emissive states in relative changes of emission intensity.
We tested the specificity of the C12-loop-miR21-probe towards the miR-21 target sequence by using other RNA sequences. First, miR-21 was scrambled to remove complementarity towards the stem’s binding domain. The scrambled miR21 sequence has the same number of specific bases as miR-21, including three rC’s, five rG’s, eight rU’s, and six rA’s. Figure S3 shows the 2D spectra of fluorescence in the visible region upon progressive addition of molar equivalent of scrambled miR-21 to C12-loop-miR21-probe. Only minor changes were observed in both “red” and “green” fluorescence peaks. Additionally, we tested the response of AgNC/ C12-loop-miR21-probe to the presence of miR-25 molecule. Figure S4 shows the results obtained with miR-25. Again, only minor changes of fluorescence intensity were observed upon addition of up to 1.25 molar equivalent of miR-25. These results suggest that the changes in the green emission we observe with miR-21 are indeed due to specific complementary binding of miR-21 to AgNC/ C12-loop-miR21-probe.

2.5. Possible Mechanisms Involved in miR21 Detection Using Fluorescence of AgNCs Templated by C12-Loop-miR21-Probe

To make an efficient detection system, changes of observable properties need to be apparent. Fluorescent AgNCs have gained popularity as optical entities for sensing applications due to several advantages over regular molecular fluorophores including high sensitivity of fluorescence to subtle changes in the environment. Our sensing design involves looped structures of a hairpin, where the stem of the hairpin contains a complementary sequence to a miR sequence of interest. The idea is that the loop is a selective host of AgNCs and the disruption of the hairpin structure results in dramatic changes of AgNCs surroundings and as a result AgNCs fluorescent properties. The observable optical properties change in response to the amount of miR-21 present in the sample. It seems that the response of the fluorescence intensity is strongly dependent on the molar equivalency of the miR-21 relative to the C12-looped hairpin (MmiR21/MAgNC).
Indeed, C12 looped hairpin structures host nanoclusters with the “red” emission, which is similar to the emissive pattern we observed for other C12 templates including C12-alone, ssDNA-C12, and dsDNA-C12 templates [2]. For the detection of miR sequences involving fluorescent silver nanoclusters, the sensing ability is tightly linked to the appearance of “green” emitting species, as we observed in this study. The intensity of the “green” fluorescence increases dramatically to very bright green emissions that dominate the fluorescence spectrum. What is the possible mechanism of sensing by AgNC? Why does the green fluorescence appear? The following are possible mechanisms of such a phenomenon.
Silver nanoclusters are generally considered to have a rod-like shape with DNA favoring such selective formation of the elongated shapes. The rod-like cluster core has been suggested to be one of the common features that fluorescent DNA templated AgNC share, despite wide differences in emissive properties. The detailed crystal structure of the 16 atom AgNC obtained recently confirmed that this generally presumed shape is the true shape of the nanoclusters [82]. Slight changes in the shape of the clusters from rod like to curved (angled, tilted) ones may result in changes of the fluorescent properties [83,84,85]. Such structural changes may occur for the clusters of the same length (AgN) greatly affecting spectral changes of the AgNCs. It was shown that fluorescent properties can be very sensitive to the geometry of the elongated clusters [85]. The fluorescent properties are especially sensitive to how the core of neutral silver atoms (Ag0) is arranged within the cluster [83]. It is quite possible that structural changes in the template structure upon binding of the complementary RNA strand may result in changes of AgNC shape from rod-like to curved-like and, thus, their emissive properties from “red” to “green”.
Alternatively, we must consider that the loop opens up during the detection process, exposing AgNCs nested in the loop to aqueous environment. Dielectric properties (ε) of the surroundings play an important role in the spectral characteristics of fluorescent materials including silver nanoclusters [83]. Such change in the environment from mostly non-polar (DNA bases) to mostly polar (H2O) may significantly alter effective dielectric constant and thus energetic position of HOMO and LUMO resulting in solvatochromic shift of the emission wavelength from “red” to “green”. Such an environmental change may cause the wavelength shift. The shift turns out to be beneficial for the detection strategies which involve a hairpin loop opening when miR sequences bind, as we demonstrate in this study on the miR21 example.
It is generally accepted that the neutral core dictates the emissive properties of a nanocluster. The magic numbers, 6 and 4, were assigned to “red” and “green” emissive species respectively. A cluster of the following composition [ A g 6 0 A g N 6 + ] containing six neutral silver atoms would emit in “red” and the cluster [ A g 4 0 A g N 4 + ] with four neutral silver atoms would emit in “green” [86]. Conversion of [ A g 6 0 A g N 6 + ] cluster to [ A g 4 0 A g N 4 + ] would result in respective change of color from mostly “red” to “green”. As the clusters are encapsulated in a C12 loop, there is a negligible chance for the exchange of the materials, such as the binding of an extra silver atom or the dissociation of one. Therefore, we propose that the changes in the AgNC structure/composition simply occur by changing the oxidative state of the core from [ A g 6 0 ]   t o   [ A g 4 0 ] . It has been recently proposed that such a conversion is possible [87]. The opening of the loop and the exposure of the clusters to larger fresh volumes of solvent would result in more contact with oxidizing species dissolved in the solution such as, for example, molecular oxygen [88]. Therefore, the opening of the loop should trigger conversion of [ A g 6 0 ] to [ A g 4 0 ] , and, thus, a change of color form “red” to “green” for the clusters.
While all the above noted mechanistic descriptions may indeed be possible, the most probable explanation that we propose is the activation of dark “green” fluorescent states upon opening of the loop during the binding of miR. The appearance of the “green” fluorescent color is most likely the result of structural changes that activate emission transitions between the states previously appearing “dark” in the spectrum. These transitions may simply be favorable upon the newly exposed polar (water) environment stabilizing the fluorescence of previously “dark” transitions. Such states have been observed before in silver nanoclusters formed using longer Calf-Thymus DNA template [89]. The formation of the non-emitting long-lived transient species was estimated at high efficiency ~25%. The origin of the AgNC-DNA complex was presumably assigned to the charge–transfer nature, explaining the high yield of the non-emitting states.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All DNA oligonucleotides and RNA sequences were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coralville, IA, USA) as desalted products and used without further purification (Table 1). Sodium borohydride was purchased from TCI America, Inc. (Portland, OR, USA), all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of Ag-DNA Nanoclusters

In a typical preparation, DNA and AgNO3 aqueous solutions were mixed at 55 °C and incubated for 25 min at room temperature in the ammonium acetate buffer (15 mM ammonium acetate, NH4OAc, and 5 mM sodium chloride, NaCl). Next, NaBH4 aqueous solution was added and stirred vigorously. The final concentrations of the components were CDNA-template = 10 μM, CAgNO3 = 100 nM, CNaBH4 = 10 μM, CNH4Ac= 50 mM. The solution then was allowed to react in the dark for 24 h at 4 °C.

3.3. Fluorescence Measurements

The excitation and emission spectra were acquired on a Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In all the measurements concentration of DNA was kept the same at 10 µM. Relative amounts of miR-21 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 molar equivalent of miR-21 to C12-loop-miR21-probe) were added to a 60 µL volume of matured AgNC probe and fluorescence was measured after 2 h of incubation. Measurements have been carried out at room temperature of ~22 °C using Sub-Micro Fluorometer Cell, model 16.40F-Q-10 (from StarnaCells, Inc., Atascadero, CA, USA). The excitation–emission matrix spectra (EEMS) were recorded with 2 nm resolution. Fluorescence spectra were recorded with the emission wavelength ranging from 270 nm to 800 nm, and the initial excitation wavelength was set to 220 nm and the final excitation wavelength was set to 700 nm with an increment of 2 nm. The slits were open to 10 µm and the PMT voltage was set to 700 V. Matrix data were then used for 2D contour plot using MagicPlot Pro software.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we developed a novel method to detect miR sequences with the use of silver nanoclusters. The proof of principle was demonstrated on detection of miR-21 molecules but can be easily generalized to other miR sequences. The design of the miR probe involves a hairpin DNA structure with a C12 loop that templates a specific type of AgNCs. These AgNCs emit in red when the hairpin is closed but activate “green” and “ultraviolet” emitting states of the AgNCs when the hairpin opens due to binding of the target miR molecule. Both “green” and “ultraviolet” states are dark and initially fluorescently silent. Their activation due to binding is so strong that, as our results demonstrate, they can be used for the quantitative detection of miR-21. An important feature of the developed probe is its performance at room temperature, which does not require any additional hardware to control temperature. The experimental results presented here point to a complexity of AgNCs optical properties and future studies will require to pinpoint the exact nature of the differently “colored” emissive species and their subtle responses to environmental changes. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that using fluorescent AgNCs represents a simple and cost-effective method of miR detection. Considering that fluorescent DNA-AgNCs have emerged as better alternatives to standard organic or QD emitters, this method has a potential for the quantitative analysis of low levels of miR sequences, which will contribute to the establishment of early diagnostic tools in various types of cancer.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.K.; methodology, L.E.Y. and A.V.K.; data acquisition, L.E.Y. and A.V.K.; data analysis, L.E.Y. and A.V.K.; resources, A.V.K.; writing, reviewing and editing, L.E.Y. and A.V.K.; project administration, A.V.K.; funding acquisition, A.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was partially supported by the ACS Petroleum Research Fund: PRF# 58498-UNI5 to A.V.K.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gwinn, E.; Schultz, D.; Copp, S.M.; Swasey, S. DNA-Protected Silver Clusters for Nanophotonics. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 180–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yourston, L.E.; Lushnikov, A.Y.; Shevchenko, O.A.; Afonin, K.A.; Krasnoslobodtsev, A.V. First Step Towards Larger DNA-Based Assemblies of Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters: Template Design and Detailed Characterization of Optical Properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, F.; Tan, W.B.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, X.; Wang, M. Luminescent nanomaterials for biological labelling. Nanotechnology 2005, 17, R1–R13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Díez, I.; Ras, R.H.A. Fluorescent silver nanoclusters. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1963–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gong, W.; Das, P.; Samanta, S.; Xiong, J.; Pan, W.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Qu, J.; Yang, Z. Redefining the photo-stability of common fluorophores with triplet state quenchers: Mechanistic insights and recent updates. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 8695–8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, S.; Dickson, R.M.; Yu, J. Developing luminescent silver nanodots for biological applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1867–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shang, L.; Dong, S.; Nienhaus, G.U. Ultra-small fluorescent metal nanoclusters: Synthesis and biological applications. Nano Today 2011, 6, 401–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peyser, L.A.; Vinson, A.E.; Bartko, A.P.; Dickson, R.M. Photoactivated Fluorescence from Individual Silver Nanoclusters. Science 2001, 291, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Díaz, S.A.; Hastman, D.A.; Medintz, I.L.; Oh, E. Understanding energy transfer with luminescent gold nanoclusters: A promising new transduction modality for biorelated applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 7907–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, W.-Y.; Lan, G.-Y.; Chang, H.-T. Use of Fluorescent DNA-Templated Gold/Silver Nanoclusters for the Detection of Sulfide Ions. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 9450–9455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, M.; Ye, B.-C. Label-free fluorescent detection of copper(ii) using DNA-templated highly luminescent silver nanoclusters. Analyst 2011, 136, 5139–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, Y.-T.; Lan, G.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.; Chang, H.-T. Detection of Copper Ions Through Recovery of the Fluorescence of DNA-Templated Copper/Silver Nanoclusters in the Presence of Mercaptopropionic Acid. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 8566–8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lan, G.-Y.; Huang, C.-C.; Chang, H.-T. Silver nanoclusters as fluorescent probes for selective and sensitive detection of copper ions. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shang, L.; Dong, S. Silver nanocluster-based fluorescent sensors for sensitive detection of Cu(ii). J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4636–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, Z.; Li, S.; Jiang, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, L.; Liu, J.; Qi, W.; Wang, H. Silver Nanoclusters with Specific Ion Recognition Modulated by Ligand Passivation toward Fluorimetric and Colorimetric Copper Analysis and Biological Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Guo, W.; Yuan, J.; Wang, E. Oligonucleotide-stabilized Ag nanoclusters as novel fluorescence probes for the highly selective and sensitive detection of the Hg2+ ion. Chem. Commun. 2009, 395–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lan, G.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.; Chang, H.-T. Control of synthesis and optical properties of DNA templated silver nanoclusters by varying DNA length and sequence. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deng, L.; Zhou, Z.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Dong, S. Fluorescent silver nanoclusters in hybridized DNA duplexes for the turn-on detection of Hg2+ ions. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11065–11067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. MacLean, J.L.; Morishita, K.; Liu, J. DNA stabilized silver nanoclusters for ratiometric and visual detection of Hg2+ and its immobilization in hydrogels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 48, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, C.; Wei, C. DNA-templated silver nanocluster as a label-free fluorescent probe for the highly sensitive and selective detection of mercury ions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Ai, J.; Dong, S.; Wang, E. Ion-Tuned DNA/Ag Fluorescent Nanoclusters As Versatile Logic Device. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6334–6338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lv, M.; Zhou, W.; Fan, D.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, X.; Ren, J.; Wang, E. Illuminating Diverse Concomitant DNA Logic Gates and Concatenated Circuits with Hairpin DNA-Templated Silver Nanoclusters as Universal Dual-Output Generators. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, G.; Li, J.; Feng, D.-Q.; Zhu, J.-J.; Wang, W. Silver Nanoclusters Beacon as Stimuli-Responsive Versatile Platform for Multiplex DNAs Detection and Aptamer–Substrate Complexes Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, J.; Yeh, H.-C.; Yoo, H.; Werner, J.H.; Martinez, J.S. Silver nanocluster aptamers: In situ generation of intrinsically fluorescent recognition ligands for protein detection. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2294–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, J.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, H.; Le, X.C.; Zhu, J.-J. Binding-Induced Fluorescence Turn-On Assay Using Aptamer-Functionalized Silver Nanocluster DNA Probes. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5170–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, J.-J.; Song, X.-R.; Wang, Y.-W.; Zheng, A.-X.; Chen, G.-N.; Yang, H.-H. Label-free and fluorescence turn-on aptasensor for protein detection via target-induced silver nanoclusters formation. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 749, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, S.W.; Vosch, T. Rapid Detection of MicroRNA by a Silver Nanocluster DNA Probe. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 6935–6939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shah, P.; Rørvig-Lund, A.; Chaabane, S.B.; Thulstrup, P.W.; Kjaergaard, H.G.; Fron, E.; Hofkens, J.; Yang, S.W.; Vosch, T. Design Aspects of Bright Red Emissive Silver Nanoclusters/DNA Probes for MicroRNA Detection. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8803–8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, M.; Yin, B.-C.; Ye, B.-C. Attomolar Ultrasensitive MicroRNA Detection by DNA-Scaffolded Silver-Nanocluster Probe Based on Isothermal Amplification. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5165–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bossert, N.; de Bruin, D.; Götz, M.; Bouwmeester, D.; Heinrich, D. Fluorescence-tunable Ag-DNA biosensor with tailored cytotoxicity for live-cell applications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhu, H.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, X. Ag cluster-aptamer hybrid: Specifically marking the nucleus of live cells. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11960–11962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, L.; Tan, C.; Yang, J.; Chen, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H. DNA-Templated Silver Nanoclusters for Multiplexed Fluorescent DNA Detection. Small 2015, 11, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ye, T.; Peng, Y.; Yuan, M.; Cao, H.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, F. A “turn-on” fluorometric assay for kanamycin detection by using silver nanoclusters and surface plasmon enhanced energy transfer. Microchim. Acta 2018, 186, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ma, J.-L.; Yin, B.-C.; Le, H.-N.; Ye, B.-C. Label-Free Detection of Sequence-Specific DNA Based on Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters-Assisted Surface Plasmon-Enhanced Energy Transfer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 12856–12863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, B.; Pan, X.; Cobb, G.P.; Anderson, T.A. microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev. Biol. 2007, 302, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, J.-G.; Wang, J.-J.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, K.; Yang, G.-H. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) represses tumor suppressor PTEN and promotes growth and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clin. Chim. Acta 2010, 411, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. El Gedawy, G.; Obada, M.; Kelani, A.; El-Said, H.; Ghanayem, N.M. Circulating MiRNA-21 and programed cell death (PDCD) 4 gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Egyptian patients. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2017, 18, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Asangani, I.A.; Rasheed, S.A.K.; Nikolova, D.A.; Leupold, J.H.; Colburn, N.H.; Post, S.; Allgayer, H. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2008, 27, 2128–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhu, S.; Wu, H.; Wu, F.; Nie, D.; Sheng, S.; Mo, Y.-Y. MicroRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes in invasion and metastasis. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Iorio, M.V.; Ferracin, M.; Liu, C.-G.; Veronese, A.; Spizzo, R.; Sabbioni, S.; Magri, E.; Pedriali, M.; Fabbri, M.; Campiglio, M.; et al. MicroRNA Gene Expression Deregulation in Human Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Volinia, S.; Calin, G.A.; Liu, C.-G.; Ambs, S.; Cimmino, A.; Petrocca, F.; Visone, R.; Iorio, M.; Roldo, C.; Ferracin, M.; et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. PANS 2006, 103, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Iorio, M.V.; Visone, R.; Di Leva, G.; Donati, V.; Petrocca, F.; Casalini, P.; Taccioli, C.; Volinia, S.; Liu, C.-G.; Alder, H.; et al. MicroRNA Signatures in Human Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lui, W.-O.; Pourmand, N.; Patterson, B.K.; Fire, A. Patterns of Known and Novel Small RNAs in Human Cervical Cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Xu, L.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. MicroRNA-21 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of cervical cancer cells via tumor necrosis factor-α. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 4659–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chan, J.A.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Kosik, K.S. MicroRNA-21 Is an Antiapoptotic Factor in Human Glioblastoma Cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Qu, K.; Lin, T.; Pang, Q.; Liu, T.; Wang, Z.; Tai, M.; Meng, F.; Zhang, J.; Wan, Y.; Mao, P.; et al. Extracellular miRNA-21 as a novel biomarker in glioma: Evidence from meta-analysis, clinical validation and experimental investigations. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 33994–34010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Meng, F.; Henson, R.; Wehbe-Janek, H.; Ghoshal, K.; Jacob, S.T.; Patel, T. MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yi, P.S.; Li, J.S. High expression of miR-21 is not a predictor of poor prognosis in all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 8, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, H.; Zhu, X. MicroRNA-21 and microRNA-30c as diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 2039–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hu, G.-y.; Tao, F.; Wang, W.; Ji, K.-w. Prognostic value of microRNA-21 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sicard, F.; Gayral, M.; Lulka, H.; Buscail, L.; Cordelier, P. Targeting miR-21 for the therapy of pancreatic cancer. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Mao, X.; Sun, Y.; Tang, J. Serum miR-21 is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 35, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Asaga, S.; Kuo, C.; Nguyen, T.; Terpenning, M.; Giuliano, A.E.; Hoon, D.S.B. Direct Serum Assay for MicroRNA-21 Concentrations in Early and Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Xie, Z.; Chen, G.; Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Huang, J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, P.; Qin, Y.; Duan, Y.; Gong, B.; et al. Salivary microRNAs as promising biomarkers for detection of esophageal cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Humeau, M.; Vignolle-Vidoni, A.; Sicard, F.; Martins, F.; Bournet, B.; Buscail, L.; Torrisani, J.; Cordelier, P. Salivary MicroRNA in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Shen, J.; Todd, N.W.; Zhang, H.; Yu, L.; Lingxiao, X.; Mei, Y.; Guarnera, M.; Liao, J.; Chou, A.; Lu, C.L.; et al. Plasma microRNAs as potential biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. Lab. Investig. 2011, 91, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Abue, M.; Yokoyama, M.; Shibuya, R.; Tamai, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Sato, I.; Tanaka, N.; Hamada, S.; Shimosegawa, T.; Sugamura, K.; et al. Circulating miR-483-3p and miR-21 is highly expressed in plasma of pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Virgilio, E.; Giarnieri, E.; Giovagnoli, M.R.; Montagnini, M.; Proietti, A.; D’Urso, R.; Mercantini, P.; Balducci, G.; Cavallini, M. Gastric Juice MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Screening Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 613–616. [Google Scholar]
  59. Cui, L.; Zhang, X.; Ye, G.; Zheng, T.; Song, H.; Deng, H.; Xiao, B.; Xia, T.; Yu, X.; Le, Y.; et al. Gastric juice MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the screening of gastric cancer. Cancer 2013, 119, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shen, J.; Liao, J.; Guarnera, M.A.; Fang, H.; Cai, L.; Stass, S.A.; Jiang, F. Analysis of MicroRNAs in sputum to improve computed tomography for lung cancer diagnosis. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xing, L.; Su, J.; Guarnera, M.A.; Zhang, H.; Cai, L.; Zhou, R.; Stass, S.A.; Jiang, F. Sputum microRNA Biomarkers for Identifying Lung Cancer in Indeterminate Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Shi, R.; Wang, P.-Y.; Li, X.-Y.; Chen, J.-X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.-Z.; Zhang, C.-G.; Jiang, T.; Li, W.-B.; Ding, W.; et al. Exosomal levels of miRNA-21 from cerebrospinal fluids associated with poor prognosis and tumor recurrence of glioma patients. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26971–26981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Baraniskin, A.; Kuhnhenn, J.; Schlegel, U.; Maghnouj, A.; Zöllner, H.; Schmiegel, W.; Hahn, S.; Schroers, R. Identification of microRNAs in the cerebrospinal fluid as biomarker for the diagnosis of glioma. Neuro. Oncol. 2012, 14, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Akers, J.C.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Kim, R.; Skog, J.; Nakano, I.; Pingle, S.; Kalinina, J.; Hua, W.; Kesari, S.; Mao, Y.; et al. MiR-21 in the extracellular vesicles (EVs) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): A platform for glioblastoma biomarker development. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Zhi, X.; Ramón, G.A.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Pan, F.; Cui, D. Hairpin DNA-Templated Silver Nanoclusters as Novel Beacons in Strand Displacement Amplification for MicroRNA Detection. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. New, S.Y.; Lee, S.T.; Su, X.D. DNA-templated silver nanoclusters: Structural correlation and fluorescence modulation. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 17729–17746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Copp, S.M.; Gorovits, A.; Swasey, S.M.; Gudibandi, S.; Bogdanov, P.; Gwinn, E.G. Fluorescence Color by Data-Driven Design of Genomic Silver Clusters. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8240–8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schultz, D.; Gwinn, E. Stabilization of fluorescent silver clusters by RNA homopolymers and their DNA analogs: C,G versus A,T(U) dichotomy. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4715–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ritchie, C.M.; Johnsen, K.R.; Kiser, J.R.; Antoku, Y.; Dickson, R.M.; Petty, J.T. Ag Nanocluster Formation Using a Cytosine Oligonucleotide Template. J. Phys. Chem. C Nanomater. Interfaces 2007, 111, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Ramsay, H.; Simon, D.; Steele, E.; Hebert, A.; Oleschuk, R.D.; Stamplecoskie, K.G. The power of fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy in the identification and characterization of complex mixtures of fluorescent silver clusters. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 42080–42086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Yourston, L.E.; Rolband, L.A.; West, C.; Lushnikov, A.Y.; Afonin, K.A.; Krasnoslobodtsev, A.V. Tuning properties of silver nanoclusters with RNA nanoring assemblies. Nanoscale 2020, in press. [Google Scholar]
  72. O’Neill, P.R.; Gwinn, E.G.; Fygenson, D.K. UV Excitation of DNA Stabilized Ag Cluster Fluorescence via the DNA Bases. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 24061–24066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Petty, J.T.; Zheng, J.; Hud, N.V.; Dickson, R.M. DNA-Templated Ag Nanocluster Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5207–5212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  75. Galley, W.C.; Purkey, R.M. Role of Heterogeneity of the Solvation Site in Electronic Spectra in Solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1970, 67, 1116–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Mukherjee, S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Wavelength-selective fluorescence as a novel tool to study organization and dynamics in complex biological systems. J. Fluoresc. 1995, 5, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Demchenko, A.P. The red-edge effects: 30 years of exploration. Luminescence 2002, 17, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Petty, J.T.; Ganguly, M.; Yunus, A.I.; He, C.; Goodwin, P.M.; Lu, Y.-H.; Dickson, R.M. A DNA-Encapsulated Silver Cluster and the Roles of Its Nucleobase Ligands. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 28382–28392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Holstein, C.A.; Griffin, M.; Hong, J.; Sampson, P.D. Statistical Method for Determining and Comparing Limits of Detection of Bioassays. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 9795–9801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Masdor, N.A. Determination of the Detection Limit using the Four-Parameter Logistic Model for The Double-Antibody Sandwich ELISA for the Rapid Detection of Bacillus cereus in Food. J. Environ. Microbiol. Toxicol. 2017, 5, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yeh, H.-C.; Sharma, J.; Han, J.J.; Martinez, J.S.; Werner, J.H. A DNA-Silver Nanocluster Probe That Fluoresces upon Hybridization. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3106–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cerretani, C.; Kanazawa, H.; Vosch, T.; Kondo, J. Crystal structure of a NIR-Emitting DNA-Stabilized Ag16 Nanocluster. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 17153–17157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Copp, S.M.; Schultz, D.; Swasey, S.M.; Faris, A.; Gwinn, E.G. Cluster Plasmonics: Dielectric and Shape Effects on DNA-Stabilized Silver Clusters. Nano Lett 2016, 16, 3594–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schultz, D.; Gardner, K.; Oemrawsingh, S.S.R.; Markešević, N.; Olsson, K.; Debord, M.; Bouwmeester, D.; Gwinn, E. Evidence for Rod-Shaped DNA-Stabilized Silver Nanocluster Emitters. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2797–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ramazanov, R.R.; Sych, T.S.; Reveguk, Z.V.; Maksimov, D.A.; Vdovichev, A.A.; Kononov, A.I. Ag–DNA Emitter: Metal Nanorod or Supramolecular Complex? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3560–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Copp, S.M.; Schultz, D.; Swasey, S.; Pavlovich, J.; Debord, M.; Chiu, A.; Olsson, K.; Gwinn, E. Magic Numbers in DNA-Stabilized Fluorescent Silver Clusters Lead to Magic Colors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 959–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cerretani, C.; Vosch, T. Switchable Dual-Emissive DNA-Stabilized Silver Nanoclusters. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 7895–7902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Collin, F. Chemical Basis of Reactive Oxygen Species Reactivity and Involvement in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Volkov, I.L.; Reveguk, Z.V.; Serdobintsev, P.Y.; Ramazanov, R.R.; Kononov, A.I. DNA as UV light–harvesting antenna. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 3543–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the template design and detection strategy, (B) a photograph of fluorescent glowing of silver nanoclusters (AgNCs) templated on C12-loop-miR21-probe under the UV excitation on trans-illuminator. (C) Fluorescence spectrum of AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-probe recorded with 260 nm excitation wavelength, (D) Excitation spectrum of the AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-probe for the emission at λR = 600 nm. Gaps in the spectra are due to removal of the second order scattering. Green and red solid lines are plotted as “guide for the eye” in the positions of major “green” and “red” emission peaks.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the template design and detection strategy, (B) a photograph of fluorescent glowing of silver nanoclusters (AgNCs) templated on C12-loop-miR21-probe under the UV excitation on trans-illuminator. (C) Fluorescence spectrum of AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-probe recorded with 260 nm excitation wavelength, (D) Excitation spectrum of the AgNCs/C12-loop-miR21-probe for the emission at λR = 600 nm. Gaps in the spectra are due to removal of the second order scattering. Green and red solid lines are plotted as “guide for the eye” in the positions of major “green” and “red” emission peaks.
Molecules 25 03026 g001
Figure 2. Detailed excitation-emission maps of AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe. (A) UV/UV-Vis excitation-emission map and (B) Vis/Vis excitation-emission map.
Figure 2. Detailed excitation-emission maps of AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe. (A) UV/UV-Vis excitation-emission map and (B) Vis/Vis excitation-emission map.
Molecules 25 03026 g002
Figure 3. The collection of 2D spectra showing changes upon progressive addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to C12-loop-miR21-probe with AgNCs. (A) 0 molar equivalent; (B) 0.25 molar equivalent; (C) 0.50 molar equivalent; (D) 0.75 molar equivalent; and (E) 1.00 molar equivalent.
Figure 3. The collection of 2D spectra showing changes upon progressive addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to C12-loop-miR21-probe with AgNCs. (A) 0 molar equivalent; (B) 0.25 molar equivalent; (C) 0.50 molar equivalent; (D) 0.75 molar equivalent; and (E) 1.00 molar equivalent.
Molecules 25 03026 g003
Figure 4. (A) Comparative graph of emission spectra for the “red” AgNCs excited at λ = 560 nm showing spectral changes upon incremental addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe; (B) Comparative graph of emission spectra for the “green” AgNCs excited at λ = 480 nm showing spectral changes upon incremental addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe; (C) Fluorescence intensity plot, λEXCEM = 480/565 nm, as a function of miR21 molar equivalent concentration showing the fit (red solid line) using Equation (1), error bar represents variations based on three independent measurements.
Figure 4. (A) Comparative graph of emission spectra for the “red” AgNCs excited at λ = 560 nm showing spectral changes upon incremental addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe; (B) Comparative graph of emission spectra for the “green” AgNCs excited at λ = 480 nm showing spectral changes upon incremental addition of molar equivalent of miR-21 to AgNC/C12-loop-miR21-probe; (C) Fluorescence intensity plot, λEXCEM = 480/565 nm, as a function of miR21 molar equivalent concentration showing the fit (red solid line) using Equation (1), error bar represents variations based on three independent measurements.
Molecules 25 03026 g004
Table 1. Nucleic acid sequences used for the probe design and as target analyte molecules.
Table 1. Nucleic acid sequences used for the probe design and as target analyte molecules.
NameSequence
C12-loop-miR21-probe5′-TCAACATCAGTCTGATAAGCTACCCCCCCCCCCCTAGCTTA-3′
miR-215′-rUrArGrCrUrUrArUrCrArGrArCrUrGrArUrGrUrUrGrA-3′
miR-21 scrambled5′-rArCrUrGrUrCrArUrUrCrArGrUrArGrUrGrArArGrUrU-3′
miR-255′-rCrArUrUrGrCrArCrUrUrGrUrCrUrCrGrGrUrCrUrGrA-3′

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yourston, L.E.; Krasnoslobodtsev, A.V. Micro RNA Sensing with Green Emitting Silver Nanoclusters. Molecules 2020, 25, 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133026

AMA Style

Yourston LE, Krasnoslobodtsev AV. Micro RNA Sensing with Green Emitting Silver Nanoclusters. Molecules. 2020; 25(13):3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yourston, Liam E., and Alexey V. Krasnoslobodtsev. 2020. "Micro RNA Sensing with Green Emitting Silver Nanoclusters" Molecules 25, no. 13: 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop