Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of New Substituted Diquinolinyl-Pyridine Ligands as Anticancer Agents by Targeting G-Quadruplex
Next Article in Special Issue
GC-MS Analysis of the Volatile Constituents in the Leaves of 14 Compositae Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Compressional-Puffing Pretreatment Enhances Neuroprotective Effects of Fucoidans from the Brown Seaweed Sargassum hemiphyllum on 6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Labdane-Type Diterpenes, Galangalditerpenes A–C, with Melanogenesis Inhibitory Activity from the Fruit of Alpinia galanga
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Molecules 2018, 23(1), 80; doi:10.3390/molecules23010080

Article
Exploring the Chemical Diversity of Algerian Plants: Three New Pentacyclic Triterpenoids from Launaea acanthoclada Roots
Nabila Zergainoh 1,2, Maria Letizia Ciavatta 1,*, Marianna Carbone 1, Fatma Bitam 3, Mohamed Cherif Aberkane 2 and Margherita Gavagnin 1
1
National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), Via Campi Flegrei, 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy
2
Laboratory of Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry (L.C.C.E), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences of the Matter, University of Batna 1, 05000 Batna, Algeria
3
Department of Pharmacy, University of Batna 2, Faculty of Medicine, 05000 Batna, Algeria
*
Correspondence: Tel.: +39-081-867-5243
Received: 7 December 2017 / Accepted: 28 December 2017 / Published: 30 December 2017

Abstract

:
The chemical study of Launaea acanthoclada from South-East Algeria led to the isolation of twelve oxygenated terpenoid compounds, including three new pentacyclic triterpenoids 13 with either lupane or ursane rearranged skeletons. The structure and the stereochemistry of these compounds were established by spectroscopic methods, including NMR techniques. The chemical pattern of L. acanthoclada is in accordance with the triterpenoid scenario of the genus Launaea embracing to date lupane, oleane, ursane and taraxastane skeletons. However, the carbon frameworks exhibited by new compounds 13 have never been reported from Launaea species.
Keywords:
Launaea acanthoclada; triterpenoids; lupane; bauerane; structural elucidation; NMR

1. Introduction

Launaea Cass. is a small genus of the family Asteraceae (tribe Lactuceae) consisting of about 50 species, most of which are adapted to dry, saline and sandy habitats [1]. Launaea genus is mainly distributed in the South Mediterranean, Africa and Southwestern Asia and, in particular, is very common in the North African regions [2,3]. Launaea acanthoclada Maire (synonym: Launaea lanifera Pau) is one of the nine Launaea species endemic of North Africa that are present in the flora of Algeria [1,3]. This plant is a yellow flowered perennial herb up to 40 cm high growing in Algerian superior arid steppes [1,2] and in some regions of Morocco as well as in the arid areas of Southeast Spain [4,5]. Traditionally, Launaea species have been used in North African popular medicine for the treatment of several diseases, especially those of liver, lungs and stomach, as well as to heal infected wounds [6]. A number of chemical studies have been previously conducted to investigate the composition of the various Launaea species with regards mainly to the volatile fraction (essential oils) and phenolic constituents [6] even though studies on the terpenoid content of selected species including L. pinnatifida, L. asplenifolia, L. arborescens, L. nudicaulis and L. residifolia have been also appeared in the literature [7].
In the course of our ongoing phytochemical studies on Algerian plants [8,9,10] we have investigated the chemistry of Algerian Launaea acanthoclada (local names “kebbad” and “cedada”). To the best of our knowledge, only two previous studies describing phenolic [11] and essential oil [12] components have been reported in the literature for this species. In particular, the essential oil fraction was found to be constituted by apocarotenoids, monoterpene and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons [12].
The present study was focused to elucidate the constituents of the Et2O soluble portion from the hydroalcoholic extract of the plant. The chemical analysis of this extract revealed the presence of oxygenated terpenoid constituents, which mainly included triterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids, along with fatty acid lipids and sterols. In particular, in this study, three new pentacyclic triterpenoids, named acantholupenone (1), acanthobauerendione (2) and acanthobauerenone (3), as well as nine known sesqui- and triterpenoids 412 were obtained (Figure 1). The isolation and the chemical characterization of these compounds is described here.

2. Results and Discussion

Roots and aerial parts of L. acanthoclada were carefully separated, allowed to dry, and thus, exhaustively extracted with a hydroalcoholic solution. The extracts of each part were evaporated to give two crude residues, which were subsequently transferred to ICB laboratories for the chemical analysis. The Et2O soluble portions of the hydroalcoholic extracts of roots and aerial parts were analyzed by comparative TLC chromatography. The secondary metabolite patterns of the two distinct parts revealed to be almost similar and no substantial difference in the relative distribution of the metabolites was observed. Therefore, a portion of the extract of roots was subjected to a first fractionation on silica gel column (see Section 3). 1H-NMR spectroscopic analysis evidenced the presence of terpenoid components in four selected fractions. These fractions were subsequently subjected to further purification steps to give three new compounds 13 and nine known compounds 412.
Fraction I (24.7 mg) was constituted of triterpenoids all containing the 3-oxo functionality. In particular, lupenone (5) [13,14] and taraxasterone (6) [15,16] were the main components of the fraction whereas minor metabolites included new lupenone-related 1 and dammara-20(21),24-dien-3-one 4 [17,18]. Fraction II (14.3 mg) contained four pentacyclic triterpenoids, new bauerane-type compounds 2 and 3 along with olean-12-ene-3,11-dione (7) [19,20] and urs-12-ene-3,11-dione (8) [19,21], all of which exhibited an enone functional group. Fraction III constituting about 20% of the extract was a mixture of eudesmane dialdehyde 9 [22] and the triterpenoid alcohols lupeol (10) [23,24] and tirucalla-7,24-dien-3β-ol (11) [25], that were the main metabolites of L. acanthoclada. Fraction IV was a complex mixture of eudesmane sesquiterpenoids including 12 [26].
The structures of compounds 13 were established by extensive spectroscopic analysis (high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), infrared spectroscopy (IR), and ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV)). In particular, NMR experiments of 13 were conducted in different solvents to get a better resolution with regards to the high field portion of the spectra (Supplementary Materials). Known compounds 412 were identified by comparison of MS and NMR spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature. The spectroscopic characterization of compounds 8, 9 and 11 are only partially reported in the literature; the complete NMR assignments of these known molecules have also been achieved in this study (see Section 3).
Acantholupenone (1) was obtained as a white powder. The molecular formula C30H48O was deduced by the sodium adduct ion at m/z 447.3598 (M + Na)+ in the high resolution electron spray ionization mass spectrum (HRESIMS) accounting for seven indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum exhibited typical absorption bands at 1712 and 3039 cm−1 suggesting the presence of ketone and double bond functionalities in the structure. Consistent with this, the 13C-NMR spectrum (in CDCl3) displayed signals due to a carbonyl group (δC 216.9) and a trisubstituted double bond (δC 145.4 and δC 117.2) and all the other resonances between δC 12.7 and δC 56.4 assigned to sp3 alkyl carbons. This implied that the remaining unsaturation degrees required by the molecular formula should be attributed to five rings. The 1H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl3) contained six singlet methyls at δH 0.91 (H3-27), 0.92 (H3-28), 0.99 (H3-25), 1.00 (H3-26), 1.04 (H3-23), and 1.12 (H3-24), and two doublet methyls of an isopropyl group at δH 0.88 and 0.91 (H3-29 and H3-30) according to the presence of a pentacyclic 6-6-6-6-5 architecture [27]. Analysis of 1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY), total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) and hetero-nuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) experiments recorded in both CDCl3 (Table 1) and C5D5N (Section 3) led to the identification of five isolated spin systems: two CH2-CH2 moieties (rings A and D), a CH-CH2-CH (ring B) and a CH-CH2-CH2 (ring C) fragments, and finally, a sequence constituted by the CH-(CH3)2 group linked to a CH in turn connected to both a CH and to a CH2–CH2 unit (ring E). These data strongly suggested that compound 1 had to be either a rearranged lupene derivative, such as tylolupenone [28], or a hancolupenone-like triterpene [29,30,31] with an angular methyl group at C-13 rather than at the C-8 position [27]. The keto function was easily located at C-3 whereas the double bond was positioned at C-7. Careful analysis of hetero-nuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) experiments supported the structural assumption. In fact, diagnostic long-range correlations (Figure 2a) were observed from geminal methyls at C-4, H3-23 (δH 1.04) and H3-24 (δH 1.12), to C-3 (δC 216.9) and C-5 (δC 51.9), from H-1a (δH 1.99) to C-5, from H3-25 (δH 0.99) to C-5 and C-9 (δC 47.9) as well as between H-11a (δH 1.62) and C-8 (δC 145.4), H3-26 (δH 1.00) and C-8 and C-13 (δC 37.7) and, finally, H3-27 (δH 0.91) and C-12 (δC 32.4) and C-14 (δC 40.4), consistent with the proposed A-C ring pattern. In addition, in the HMBC spectrum, H3-28 (δH 0.92) showed significant cross-peaks with C-17 (δC 40.6) and C-18 (δC 56.4) supporting the D-E ring arrangement.
Once the gross structure of acantholupenone (1) was established, the stereochemical aspects were investigated by an extensive analysis of nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) and NOE difference experiments recorded in C5D5N, which provided better resolved 1H-NMR spectra. A series of NOE correlations (Figure 3a) were observed between H-2β (δH 2.74) and both H3-24 (δH 1.05) and H3-25 (δH 0.93) methyl groups as well as between H-5 (δH 1.71) and H3-23 (δH 1.10) and H-9 (δH 2.26) inferring the relative configuration of the stereogenic centers at A and B rings. In addition, in the NOESY spectrum, H3-27 (δH 0.98) showed diagnostic cross-peaks with both H-9 and H-19 (δH 1.62) implying their α-orientation whereas H-18 (δH 1.53) showed significant correlations with angular H3-26 (δH 1.02) and H3-28 (δH 0.93) methyl groups indicating their β-orientation (Figure 3a). The relative configuration of acantholupenone was thus determined as depicted in structure 1 with a trans-C,D and a cis-D,E ring junctions, and the α-oriented E-ring. This structural architecture characterizes a small group of rearranged lupene triterpenes, including tylolupenols [28], that have been suggested to be formed from lupyl cation (I) by 1,2 shifts following the deprotonation at different positions [27]. According to this, compound 1 should derive by deprotonation at C-7 and sequential migration of H3-26, H3-27, H-13, H-18 and H-19, as depicted in Figure 4. Acantholupenone is closely related to tylolupenone [28], a synthetic derivative obtained by oxidation of tylolupenols, and differed from this compound in the position of the double bond (∆7 rather than ∆9(11)). Comparison of NMR data of 1 with tylolupenone and a series of literature model compounds (i.e., pichierenone [32] and swertanone [33]) exhibiting the same A-D ring framework and either ∆7 or ∆9(11) double bond, strongly supported our assignment as reported in Table 1.
Acanthobauerendione (2) was obtained as white powder and has the molecular formula C30H46O2 as it was established by the sodium adduct ion at m/z 461.3392 (M + Na)+ in the HRESIMS spectrum. The presence of two ketone groups, one of which α,β-unsaturated, was revealed by IR and UV spectra with typical bands at νmax 1712 and 1657 cm−1 and at λmax 255 (log ε 3.56), respectively. According to this, resonances due to a ketone and an enone moiety containing a tetrasubstituted double bond were observed at δC 217.5 (C, C-3) and δC 198.0 (C, C-11), 139.5 (C, C-9), and 164.1 (C, C-8) in the carbon spectrum (CDCl3, Table 1). The 1H- and 13C-NMR data of 2 indicated six tertiary methyls [δH 1.01, δC 18.1 (H3-27); δH 1.08, δC 21.8 (H3-24); δH 1.09, δC 38.3 (H3-28); δH 1.11, δC 27.6 (H3-23); δH 1.16, δC 22.0 (H3-26); δH 1.27, δC 19.8 (H3-25)] and two secondary methyls [δH 0.90, δC 23.1 (H3-30); δH 1.03, δC 25.7 (H3-29)] (Table 1), suggesting a pentacyclic triterpenoid structure with an ursane-type or rearranged ursane skeleton [27]. In particular, the presence of a bauerane framework [34,35,36], in which the methyl group at C-14 of ursane skeleton is migrated to C-13 and the methyl group at C-8 is migrated to C-14 by 1,2 shifts from isoursyl cation (II) (Figure 5) [27], was strongly suspected due to the characteristic carbon value of H3-28 appearing abnormally deshielded [37] in triterpenes with this skeleton (i.e., [38,39,40]).
The inspection of the COSY experiment of 2 aided us to define four proton sequences: two CH2-CH2, a CH-CH2-CH2, and a CH-CH(Me)-CH(Me)-CH2-CH2 spin systems. The presence of an isolated methylene located in α-position to a carbonyl function was detected by NMR signals at δH 2.26 (s, 2H, H2-12) and δC 49.5 (CH2, C-12) (Table 1). A comprehensive analysis of 2D-NMR experiments including COSY, TOCSY, HSQC and HMBC, recorded in both CDCl3 and C5D5N, and the comparison of spectroscopic data with those of related literature compounds (i.e., [38,39,40]) allowed the determination of the planar structure of acanthobauerendione as depicted in formula 2. Particularly indicative were the HMBC correlations (Figure 2b) that implied the location of the oxo- and enone functionalities at C-3 and C-11, respectively, as well as the obvious position of tetrasubstituted double bond at C-8/C-9. In fact, in the HMBC spectrum (in CDCl3), both geminal methyls at C-4, H3-23 (δH 1.11) and H3-24 (δH 1.08), and H-2a (δH 2.55) showed cross-peaks with C-3 (δC 217.5), whereas H2-12 (δH 2.26) had correlations with C-11 (δC 198.0). Finally, correlations were observed from H2-7 (δH 2.45 and 2.14) to C-8 (δC 164.1) and C-9 (δC 139.5), from H3-25 (δH 1.27) to C-9 and from both H-6a (δH 1.72) and H3-26 (δH 1.16) to C-8. The relative configuration of compound 2 was that expected for a bauerane derivative as it was confirmed by a detailed analysis of NOESY and NOE difference experiments, recorded in C5D5N (significant effects are reported in Figure 3b). Diagnostic NOE effects were observed between H3-25 (δH 1.40) and both H-2β (δH 2.61) and H3-24 (δH 1.11) as well as between H-5 (δH 1.68) and both H3-23 (δH 1.17) and H-7α (δH 2.01) suggesting the relative configuration in rings A and B. Moreover, H-18 (δH 1.36) showed cross-peaks with H3-26 (δH 1.09), H3-28 (δH 1.03), and H3-29 (δH 0.96) implying all these substituents to be on the same side. . Finally, the NOE correlation between H-20 (δH 1.48) and H3-28 confirmed the expected α-configuration of H3-30 according to the bauerane skeleton.
A preliminary analysis of spectroscopic data of acanthobauerenone (3) revealed a close structural relationship with compound 2. The HRESIMS spectrum displayed a sodium adduct ion at m/z 505.3649 (M + Na)+ indicating the molecular formula C32H50O3 with an additional C2H4O unit with respect to compound 2. The IR spectrum showed bands at νmax 1656 and 1734 cm−1 consistent with the presence of an α,β-unsaturated ketone and an ester carbonyl, respectively. The UV band at λmax 252 (log ε 3.42) supported the presence of the enone moiety, similar to compound 2. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra (in CDCl3) of 3 almost resembled those of 2 exhibiting signals at δH 0.84 (s), 0.87 (s), 0.91 (d), 0.95 (s), 0.99 (brs), 1.01 (s), 1.06 (s) and 1.22 (s), and at δC 38.1 (CH3), 29.6 (CH3), 27.1 (CH3), 22.5 (CH3), 21.7 (CH3), 18.5 (CH3), 16.0 (CH3), and 15.4 (CH3) (Table 1), that were attributed to six tertiary and two secondary methyls in agreement with the bauerane architecture [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. The 3-oxo functionality in the structure of 2 was replaced in 3 by an acetoxy moiety as revealed by the additional methyl singlet at δH 2.07 and the 1H double doublet at δH 4.52 in the proton spectrum, and by signals at δC 170.9 (C, Ac-CO), 79.8 (CH, C-3) and 21.3 (CH3, Ac-CH3) in the carbon spectrum (Table 1). The acetoxy substituent was α-oriented by analysis of the coupling constant values of axial H-3 (dd, J = 11.6, 4.1 Hz). The double bond of the enone moiety was tetrasubstituted [δC 139.3 (C, C-8) and 164.4 (C, C-9)] and necessarily located at C-8/C-9, the same as compound 2, whereas the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl (δC 198.4) was located at C-7 by analysis of COSY and TOCSY experiments. The spin systems deduced for rings A–C, which include a CH-CH2-CH2, a CH-CH2, and a CH2-CH2 fragments, respectively, differed from those of 2 according to a different substitution pattern. Comparison of NMR data of 3 (Table 1) with literature bauerane compounds [34,35,36,37,38,39,40] strongly supported the proposed structure, which was strictly related to isobauerenyl acetate [39,40,41]. Detailed analysis of 2D-NMR experiments, which were recorded also for this compound in both CDCl3 and C5D5N, led us to fully assign proton and carbon resonances (Table 1 and Materials and Methods). In particular, inspection of HMBC spectrum (relevant correlations in Figure 2c) secured the position of the acetoxy substituent and the enone function. Diagnostic correlations were observed from H-3 (δH 4.52) to Ac-COC 170.9) and C-24 (δC 16.0), from H-5 (δH 1.72) to C-4 (δC 37.6) and C-9 (δC 164.4), from H3-25 (δH 1.01) to C-5 (δC 47.4), C-9 and C-10 (δC 39.2), from H2-6 (δH 2.41 and 2.36) to C-7 (δC 198.4) and C-10, from H2-11 (δH 2.29 and 2.14) to C-8 (δC 139.3) and C-9, and finally from H3-26 (δH 1.22) to C-8, C-14 (δC 40.4), and C-15 (δC 23.8). A detailed analysis of NOESY and NOE difference experiments, recorded in C5D5N (significant effects are reported in Figure 3c), confirmed the expected stereochemistry of acanthobauerenone as reported in structure 3.
In conclusion, we report here the first chemical investigation on the triterpenoid fraction of L. acanthoclada providing new insights into the chemistry of plants belonging to the genus Launaea. The study led to the characterization of three new triterpenoids 13, which were isolated along with known compounds 412 including triterpenoids with lupane, oleane, ursane, or taraxane skeletons. This finding was in agreement with the literature triterpenoid pattern of other Launaea species that have been reported to contain compounds with these structural architectures [7]. It is noteworthy, however, that we also report additional finding in L. acanthoclada of irregular frameworks as rearranged lupane (compound 1) and rearranged ursane (or bauerane) (compounds 2 and 3) skeletons, that have been never described from Launaea species.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were obtained with a Jasco P2000 digital polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). UV spectra were acquired on a Jasco V-650 spectrophotometer. IR were recorded on a Jasco FTIR 4100 (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). NMR experiments were recorded at the NMR Service Centre of the Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB, CNR). Chemical shifts values are reported in ppm and referenced to the internal signals of residual protons (CDCl3, δH 7.26, δC 77.0; C5D5N, δH 7.19, 7.55, 8.71; δC 123.5, 135.5, 149.9). 1D- and 2D-NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance-400 (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) operating at 400 MHz using an inverse probe fitted with a gradient along the Z-axis and a Bruker DRX-600 operating (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) at 600 MHz using an inverse TCI CryoProbe fitted with a gradient along the Z-axis. ESIMS spectra were measured in positive mode on a Micromass Q-TOF Micro spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with an HPLC Waters Alliance 2695. HRESIMS spectra were recorded on a Thermo Q-Exactive spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a UHPLC Agilent Infinity 1290 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and on a Shimadzu IT-TOF spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an ESI interface. HPLC separation was performed on a Shimadzu high-performance liquid chromatography system using a Shimadzu liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) LC-10AD equipped with an UV SPD-10A Shimadzu wavelength detector with a reversed-phase (RP) Aventis-Supelco, (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) column (10 mm × 250 mm). Silica gel chromatography was performed using precoated KieselGel 60 F254 plates (TLC) and Kieselgel 60 powder (70–230 mesh) from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The spots on TLC were visualized under UV light (254 nm) and then sprayed with 10% H2SO4 in water followed by heating.

3.2. Plant Material

The plant L. acanthoclada was collected in Tilatou, South-East Algeria, during May 2016, and identified by Prof. Bachir Oudjehih, Institute of Agronomy of University of Batna 1 (Algeria). A voucher specimen is deposited in the herbarium of the department of the same University under the number code 123/ISVSA/DA/UHLB1/2016.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Dried roots (1 kg) and aerial part (400 g) of L. acanthoclada were separately macerated with EtOH/H2O 7:3 (10 L × 3 and 4 L × 3, respectively). After filtration, the organic solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give two crude residues (77 g for roots and 30 g for aerial parts), which were suspended in H2O and partitioned with Et2O (500 mL × 3 for roots, 200 mL × 3 for aerial part). The organic phases from roots and aerial parts were evaporated to give the corresponding extracts (11.8 g and 9.0 g, respectively). A portion (2.1 g) of the Et2O extract from roots was fractionated by silica-gel column chromatography (column diameter: 5 cm diameter, 120 cm height, 100 g silica-gel) by eluting first with a gradient of Et2O in petroleum ether, and subsequently with a gradient of MeOH in CHCl3 to obtain eighteen fractions. Four selected fractions were taken into consideration after NMR inspection. Fraction I (24.7 mg), eluted with petroleum ether/Et2O 7:3, was subjected to silica-gel column chromatography using a gradient of Et2O in petroleum ether to give 11 fractions [I(1)–I(11)]. Subfraction I(5) (8.1 mg) was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA, Kromasil, 5μ, C18, 1.0 × 25 cm) with a 20 min gradient from 90% to 100% of MeOH in H2O, followed by a 30 min of 100% MeOH (flow rate 1.0 mL/min), to yield pure compounds 4 (0.2 mg, Rt 31.5 min), 5 (0.8 mg, Rt 34.2 min), 6 (1.5 mg, Rt 38.2 min) and 1 (0.3 mg, Rt 41.1 min). Fraction II (22.2 mg), eluted with petroleum ether/Et2O 6:4, was fractionated on C18 cartridge (SPE, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) eluted with a gradient of MeOH in H2O to give 3 subfractions [II(1)–II(3)]. Subfractions II(2) (8.6 mg) was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC (Phenomenex, Kromasil, 5μ, C18, 1.0 × 25 cm) with a 50 min gradient from 90% to 100% of MeOH in H2O to yield pure compounds 2 (1.4 mg, Rt 21.4 min), 7 (1.2 mg, Rt 22.3 min), 8 (1.3 mg, Rt 22.9 min) and 3 (1.5 mg, Rt 30.1 min). An aliquot (20.0 mg) of fraction III (400 mg) (eluted with petroleum ether/Et2O, 1:1 from the first column) was purified on a C18 cartridge (SPE, Macherey-Nagel) by using a gradient of MeOH in H2O to get 4 subfractions [III(1)–III(4)]. Subfraction III(2), eluted with MeOH/H2O, 7:3, contained pure compound 9 (1.1 mg), whereas subfraction III(4) (13.0 mg), eluted with MeOH, was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC (Phenomenex, Kromasil, 5μ, C18, 1.0 × 25 cm) using MeOH in isocratic mode to give pure compounds 10 (1.2 mg, Rt 22.6 min) and 11 (1.0 mg, Rt 24.8 min). Fraction IV (58.9 mg), eluted with petroleum ether/Et2O, 3:7, was additionally fractionated on a C18 cartridge (SPE, Macherey-Nagel) with a gradient of MeOH in H2O to give pure compound 12 (1.0 mg), eluted with MeOH/H2O 4:6.
Acantholupenone (1). White powder; [α] D 25 −48.5 (c 0.02, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 276 (2.83); IR (KBr) νmax 3039, 2855, 1712, 1458, 1378, 810, 723 cm1; 1H- and 13C-NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1; 1H-NMR (C5D5N, 600 MHz) δ 5.55 (1H, brd, J = 2.7 Hz, H-7), 2.74 (1H, ddd, J = 14.6, 14.6, 5.6 Hz, H-2β), 2.27 (1H, m, H-2α), 2.26 (1H, m, H-9α), 2.01 (2H, m, H2-6), 1.84 (1H, ddd, J = 12.6, 4.3, 3.6 Hz, H-1β), 1.76 (2H, m, H2-12), 1.74 (1H, m, H-22a), 1.71 (1H, m, H-5α), 1.62 (1H, m, H-19α), 1.56 (2H, m, H2-15), 1.54 (2H, m, H2-16), 1.53 (2H, m, H-20 and H-18β), 1.50 (2H, m, H2-11), 1.47 (2H, m, H2-21), 1.33 (1H, m, H-1α), 1.14 (1H, m, H-22b), 1.10 (3H, s, H3-23), 1.05 (3H, s, H3-24), 1.02 (3H, s, H3-26), 0.98 (3H, s, H3-27), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H3-30), 0.93 (6H, s, H3-25 and H3-28), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H3-29); 13C-NMR (C5D5N, 150 MHz) δ 215.7 (CO, C-3), 145.6 (C, C-8), 117.8 (CH, C-7), 57.1 (CH, C-18), 51.8 (CH, C-5), 50.3 (CH, C-19 ), 48.2 (CH, C-9), 48.0 (C, C-4), 41.5 (C, C-14), 40.0 (C, C-17), 39.3 (CH2, C-22), 38.4 (CH2, C-1), 37.2 (C, C-13), 36.5 (CH, C-20), 35.4 (CH2, C-2), 34.6 (CH2, C-16), 34.2 (C, C-10), 33.6 (CH3, C-28), 30.0 (CH2, C-12), 29.3 (CH2, C-21), 29.1 (CH2, C-15), 24.7 (CH2, C-6), 24.5 (CH3, C-23), 23.8 (CH3, C-30), 23.3 (CH3, C-27), 23.2 (CH3, C-26), 22.3 (CH3, C-29), 21.7 (CH3, C-24), 17.1 (CH2, C-11), 13.1 (CH3, C-25); ESI MS m/z 447 [M + Na]+; HR ESIMS m/z 447.3598 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C30H48ONa 447.3603).
Acanthobauerendione (2). White powder; [α] D 25 –4.8 (c 0.04, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 255 (3.56); IR (KBr) νmax 2950, 1712, 1657, 1461, 1378, 1263, 967, 805 cm1; 1H- and 13C-NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1; 1H-NMR (C5D5N, 600 MHz) δ 3.01 (1H, dt, J = 13.0, 6.8 Hz, H-1β), 2.61 (1H, m, H-2β), 2.39 (1H, m, H-2α), 2.35 (2H, ABq, J = 18.7 Hz , H2-12), 2.33 (1H, m, H-7β), 2.01 (1H, ddd, J = 12.3, 11.7, 7.5 Hz, H-7α), 1.68 (1H, dd, J = 13.0, 2.0 Hz, H-5α), 1.62 (1H, m, H-15a), 1.60 (2H, m, H-6α and H-1α), 1.56 (1H, m, H-22a), 1.48 (1H, m, H-20β ),1.46 (1H, m, H-16β ), 1.40 (3H, s, H3-25), 1.36 (1H, m, H-18β), 1.34 (1H, m, H-6β), 1.28 (1H, m, H-15b), 1.20 (1H, m, H-22b), 1.17 (3H, s, H3-23), 1.15 (1H, m, H-16α), 1.11 (3H, s, H3-24), 1.10 (2H, m, H2-21), 1.09 (3H, s, H3-26), 1.03 (3H, s, H3-28), 0.96 (3H, d, overlap, H3-29), 0.96 (1H, m, H-19α), 0.95 (3H, s, H3-27), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 5.8 Hz, H3-30); 13C-NMR (C5D5N, 150 MHz) δ 217.0 (CO, C-3), 197.8 (CO, C-11), 164.4 (C, C-8), 139.4 (C, C-9), 52.3 (CH, C-18), 51.3 (CH, C-5 ), 49.6 (CH2, C-12), 47.0 (C, C-4), 43.4 (C, C-14), 40.7 (C, C-13), 37.4 (CH2, C-16), 37.3 (CH3, C-28), 36.5 (C, C-10), 35.1 (CH2, C-1), 35.0(CH, C-19), 34.3 (CH2, C-2), 32.2 (CH2, C-17), 32.0 (CH2, C-22), 31.6 (CH, C-20), 29.3 (CH2, C-21), 28.4 (CH2, C-7), 26.8 (CH3, C-23), 25.9 (CH2, C-15), 24.8 (CH3, C-29), 22.5 (CH3, C-30), 21.0 (2 × CH3, C-24 and C-26), 19.5 (CH3, C-25), 19.4 (CH2, C-6), 18.2 (CH3, C-27); ESI MS m/z 461 [M + Na]+; HR ESIMS m/z 461.3392 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C30H46O2Na 461.3396).
Acanthobauerenone (3). White powder; [α] D 25 +4.1 (c 0.13, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 252 (3.42); IR (KBr) νmax 2949, 1734, 1656, 1597, 1459, 1370, 1243, 977 cm1; 1H- and 13C-NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1; 1H-NMR (C5D5N, 600 MHz) δ 4.72 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 4.2 Hz, H-3α), 2.70 (1H, ddd, J = 13.0, 4.3, 2.5 Hz, H-15β), 2.55 (1H, dd, J = 18.7, 5.9 Hz, H-6a), 2.49 (1H, dd, J = 18.7, 13.0 Hz, H-6b), 2.16 (1H, m, H-11α), 2.06 (1H, m, H-11β), 2.05 (3H, s, COCH3), 1.82 (1H, dd, J = 13.0, 5.9 Hz, H-5α), 1.80 (2H, m, H-21a and H-2a), 1.71 (1H, m, H-2b), 1.70 (1H, m, H-1β), 1.64 (1H, m, H-22a), 1.60 (1H, ddd, J = 14.5, 13.8, 4.3 Hz, H-16β), 1.53 (1H, m, H-20β), 1.49 (1H, ddd, J = 14.0, 12.0, 4.3 Hz, H-15α), 1.41 (1H, m, H-21b), 1.39 (1H, m, H-1α), 1.37 (3H, s, H3-26), 1.34 (3H, m, H-18β and H2-12), 1.19 (1H, m, H-22b), 1.18 (1H, m, H-16α), 1.04 (1H, m, H-19α), 1.04 (3H, s, H3-28), 1.00 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H3-29), 0.95 (3H, s, H3-25), 0.93 (3H, s, H3-24), 0.92 (3H, brs, H3-30), 0.88 (3H, s, H3-27), 0.83 (3H, s, H3-23); 13C-NMR (C5D5N, 150 MHz) δ 197.7 (CO, C-7), 170.5 (C, COCH3), 164.3 (C, C-9), 139.6 (C, C-8), 79.8 (CH, C-3), 51.6 (CH, C-18 ), 47.5 (CH, C-5), 40.7 (C, C-14), 39.4 (C, C-10), 38.9 (CH3, C-28), 38.7 (C, C-13), 37.8 (C, C-4), 36.7 (CH2, C-16), 36.2 (CH2, C-6), 34.0 (CH, C-19), 33.5 (CH2, C-1), 32.1 (CH2, C-22), 31.7 (CH, C-20), 31.5 (C, C-17), 28.2 (2 × CH2, C-21 and C-12), 27.0 (CH3, C-23), 25.3 (CH3, C-29), 24.0 (CH2, C-2), 23.7 (CH2, C-15), 22.5 (CH2, C-11), 22.0 (CH3, C-30), 21.0 (CH3, C-26), 20.7 (CH3, COCH3), 18.3 (CH3, C-25), 16.1 (CH3, C-24), 15.7 (CH3, C-27); ESI MS m/z 505 [M + Na]+; HR ESIMS m/z 505.3649 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C32H50O3Na 505.3658).
Urs-12-ene-3,11-dione (8). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 5.58 (1H, s, H-12), 2.94 (1H, m, H-1a), 2.62 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.42 (1H, s, H-9), 2.37 (1H, m, H-2b), 2.10 (1H, m, H-15a), 1.90 (1H, ddd, J = 18.7, 13.5, 5.4 Hz, H-15b), 1.88 (1H, m, H-16a), 1.70 (1H, m, H-7a), 1.55 (1H, m, H-18), 1.54 (2H, m, H2-6), 1.49 (1H, m, H-22a ), 1.47 (1H, m, H-7b ), 1.41 (1H, m, H-1b), 1.39 (1H, m, H-19), 1.34 (1H, m, H-20), 1.31 (1H, m, H-22b), 1.30 (6H, brs, H3-25 and H3-27), 1.27 (1H, m, H-5), 1.26 (2H, m, H2-21), 1.21 (3H, s, H3-26), 1.10 (3H, s, H3-24), 1.07 (3H, s, H3-23), 1.01 (1H, m, H-16b), 0.95 (3H, brs, H3-30), 0.83 (3H, s, H3-28), 0.80 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H3-29); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ 216.8 (CO, C-3), 198.7 (CO, C-11), 164.9 (C, C-13), 130.1 (C, C-12), 60.5 (CH, C-9), 58.9 (CH, C-18 ), 55.3 (CH, C-5), 47.5 (C, C-4), 44.3 (C, C-8), 43.8 (C, C-14), 40.6 (CH2, C-22), 39.5 (CH2, C-1), 39.0 (CH, C-19), 38.9 (CH, C-20), 36.4 (C, C-10), 33.7 (C, C-17), 33.9 (CH2, C-2), 31.8 (CH2, C-7), 31.7 (CH2, C-21), 28.6 (CH3, C-28), 27.5 (CH2, C-16), 27.1 (CH2, C-15), 26.0 (CH3, C-24), 21.1 (CH3, C-23), 20.9 (CH3, C-30), 20.3 (CH3, C-27 ), 18.1 (CH2, C-6), 17.7 (CH3, C-26), 17.1 (CH3, C-29), 15.4 (CH3, C-25); ESI MS m/z 461 [M + Na]+.
Eudesmane dialdehyde (9). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ 9.52 (1H, s, H-13), 9.41 (1H, s, H-15), 6.71 (1H, m, H-3), 6.26 (1H, brs, H-12), 5.96 (1H, s, H-12), 2.73 (1H, m, H-6a), 2.60 (1H, m, H-7), 2.40 (2H, m, H2-2), 2.30 (1H, m, H-5), 1.68 (1H, m, H-8a), 1.52 (1H, m, H-9a), 1.51 (1H, m, H-8b), 1.48 (1H, m, H-1a), 1.39 (1H, m, H-1b), 1.37 (1H, m, H-9b), 1.24 (1H, m, H-6b), 0.85 (3H, s, H3-14); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ 194.6 (CHO, C-15), 194.3 (CHO, C-13), 154.6 (C, C-11), 153.1 (CH, C-3), 141.8 (C, C-4), 133.1 (CH2, C-12 ), 43.5 (CH, C-5), 39.5 (CH2, C-9), 37.0 (CH, C-7), 36.4 (CH2, C-1), 32.1 (C, C-10), 27.0 (CH2, C-8), 26.3 (CH2, C-6), 24.4 (CH2, C-2), 15.7 (CH3, C-15); ESI MS m/z 255 [M + Na]+.
Tirucalla-7,24-dien-3β-ol (11). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ 5.25 (1H, brs, H-7), 5.10 (1H, m, H-24), 3.24 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 3.9 Hz, H-3), 2.19 (1H, m, H-9), 2.15 (1H, m, H-6a), 2.04 (1H, m, H-23a), 1.97 (1H, m, H-6b), 1.93 (1H, m, H-16a), 1.86 (1H, m, H-23b), 1.80 (1H, m, H-12a), 1.79 (1H, m, H-15a), 1.70 (1H, m, H-2a ), 1.68 (3H, s, H3-26 ), 1.67 (1H, m, H-1a), 1.61 (1H, m, H-2b), 1.60 (3H, s, H3-27), 1.58 (2H, m, H2-22), 1.50 (2H, m, H2-11), 1.47 (1H, m, H-17), 1.45 (1H, m, H-15b), 1.43 (1H, s, H-20), 1.30 (2H, m, H-5 and H-16b), 1.25 (1H, m, H-12b), 1.14 (1H, m, H-1b), 0.97 (6H, s, H3-30 and H3-29), 0.86 (3H, s, H3-28), 0.84 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H3-21), 0.80 (3H, s, H3-18), 0.74 (3H, s, H3-19); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ 145.9 (C, C-8), 130.7 (C, C-25), 124.8 (CH, C-24), 117.9 (CH, C-7), 78.9 (CH, C-3), 52.8 (CH, C-17), 50.3 (CH, C-5), 49.0 (CH, C-9), 48.1 (C, C-15), 43.0 (C, C-13), 38.0 (C, C-4), 37.2 (CH2, C-1), 34.4 (C, C-10), 34.1 (CH, C-20), 33.8 (CH2, C-22), 33.6 (CH2, C-12), 33.5 (CH2, C-15), 28.6 (CH2, C-16), 27.3 (2 × CH3, C-30 and C-29), 25.6 (CH3, C-26), 25.3 (CH2, C-2), 25.2 (CH2, C-23), 23.7 (CH2, C-6), 21.0 (CH3, C-18), 18.9 (CH3, C-21), 18.0 (CH2, C-11), 17.4 (CH3, C-27), 14.3 (CH3, C-28), 13.4 (CH3, C-19); ESI MS m/z 449 [M + Na]+.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: 1D- and 2D-NMR, and HRESIMS spectra of compounds 13.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank D. Melck and A. Esposito of ICB-NMR service for recording NMR spectra, and P. Amodeo for assistance in molecular computer graphics. ICB/mass spectrometry service provided by A. Cutignano and M. Zampa is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Bachir Oudjehih of University of Batna 1 for the identification of the plant. This research work was granted by MIUR-ITALY PRIN2015 “Top-down and bottom-up approach in the development of new bioactive chemical entities inspired on natural products scaffolds” (Project No. 2015MSCKCE_003)”. N. Z. is deeply grateful to the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Algeria for financial support.

Author Contributions

N.Z. carried out the experimental work including extraction, chromatographic fractionation and purification of compounds. M.L.C. and N.Z. performed the structure elucidation of the chemicals. M.C. took part in the analysis of spectroscopic data. M.L.C., and M.G. organized the whole research of this study and prepared the manuscript. M.C.A. and F.B. participated in the design of this study. All authors approved the final version manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ozenda, P. Flore et Végétation du Sahara, 3rd ed.; CNRS: Paris, French, 2004; p. 662. [Google Scholar]
  2. Quezel, P.; Santa, S. Nouvelle Flore de l’Algérie et des Régions Désertiques Méridionales, 1st ed.; CNRS: Paris, French, 1962–1963; Volume 1–2, p. 1162.
  3. Kilian, N. Revision of Launaea Cass. (Compositae, Lactuceae, Sonchinae). In Englera, 1st ed.; Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum: Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, 1997; Volume 17, pp. 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  4. Acherkouk, M.; Maatougui, A.; El Houmaiz, M.A. Communautés végétales et faciès pastoraux dans la zone de Taourirt-Tafoughalt du Maroc oriental: Écologie et inventaire floristique. Acta Bot. Malacit. 2011, 36, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  5. Peñas, J.; Cabello, J.; Valle Tendero, F.; Mota, J.F. Comunidades vegetales rupícolas y subrupícolas del sudeste ibérico (Sierra de Los Filabres). Lazaroa 2001, 22, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheriti, A.; Belboukhari, M.; Belboukhari, N.; Djeradi, H. Phytochemical and biological studies on Launaea Cass. genus (Asteraceae) from Algerian Sahara. Curr. Top. Phytochem. 2012, 11, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheriti, A.; Belboukhari, M. Terpenoids of the Saharan medicinal Plants Launaea Cass. Genus (Asteraceae) and Their Biological Activities. In Terpenoids and Squalene; Bates, A.R., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 51–70. ISBN 9781634636568. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bitam, F.; Ciavatta, M.L.; Manzo, E.; Dibi, A.; Gavagnin, M. First chemical characterisation of the terpenoid constituents of the Algerian plant Launaea arborescens. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2984–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bouzergoune, F.; Ciavatta, M.L.; Bitam, F.; Carbone, M.; Aberkane, M.C.; Gavagnin, M. Phytochemical study of Eryngium triquetrum: Isolation of polyacetylenes and lignans. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 1438–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Boumaraf, M.; Carbone, M.; Ciavatta, M.L.; Benyahia, S.; Ameddah, S.; Menad, A.; Benayache, S.; Benayache, F.; Gavagnin, M. Exploring the bioactive terpenoid content of an Algerian plant of genus Pulicaria: The ent-series of asteriscunolides. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Giner, R.M.; Diaz, J.; Manez, S.; Recio, M.C.; Soriano, C.; Rios, J.L. Phenolic of Spanish Launaea species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1992, 20, 187–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benmeddour, T.; Laouer, H.; Akkal, S.; Flamini, G. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oil of Launaea lanifera Pau grown in Algerian arid steppes. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chapon, S.; David, S. Ètude de l’insaponifiable de l’écorce d’aulne, Alnus glutinosa. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1953, 333–334. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hisham, A.; Kumar, G.J.; Fujimoto, Y.; Hara, N. Salacione and salaciol, two triterpenes from Salacia beddomei. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 1227–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hui, W.-H.; Li, M.-M. Neutral triterpenoids from Malaleuca leucadendron. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yanna, C.F.; Gomes, R.A.; Oliveira, M.S.; de Lucena, K.L.; do Nascimento, J.S.; Agra, M.F.; Igoli, J.O.; Gray, A.I.; de Souza, M.F.V. Phytochemical investigation of Wissadula periplocifolia (L.) C. Presl and evaluation of its antibacterial activity. Quim. Nova 2014, 37, 1491–1495. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mills, J.S.; Werner, A.E.A. The chemistry of dammar resin. J. Chem. Soc. (Resumed) 1955, 3132–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Phongmaykin, J.; Kumamoto, T.; Ishikawa, T.; Suttisri, R.; Saifah, E. A new sesquiterpene and other terpenoid constituents of Chisocheton penduliflorus. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2008, 31, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bandaranayake, W.M. Terpenoids of Canarium zeylanicum. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, H.-J.; Wang, K.-W.; Wu, B.; Sun, C.-R.; Pan, Y.-J. Chemical shift assignments of two oleanane triterpenes from Euonymus hederaceus. J. Zhejiang Univ. SCI 2005, 6B, 719–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. González, A.G.; Andrés, L.S.; Ravelo, A.G.; Luis, J.G.; Bazzocchi, I.L.; West, J. Terpenoids from Salvia mellifera. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 1691–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bohlmann, F.; Zdero, C.; Cuatrecasas, J.; King, R.M.; Robinson, H. Neue sesquiterpene und norterpene aus vertretern der gattung Libanothamnus. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 1145–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schulze, E.; Steiger, E. Untersuchungen über die stickstoffreien die stickstoffreien Reservestoffe der Samen von Lupinus luteus und über die Umwandlungen derselben während des Keimungsprozesses. Landw. Versuchsstat. 1889, 36, 391–476. [Google Scholar]
  24. Reynolds, W.F.; McLean, S.; Poplawski, J.; Enriquez, R.G.; Escobar, L.I.; Leon, I. Total assignment of 13C and 1H spectra of three isomeric triterpenol derivatives by 2D NMR: An investigation of the potential utility of 1H chemical shifts in structural investigations of complex natural products. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 341–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Itoh, T.; Tamura, T.; Matsumoto, T. Tirucalla-7,24-dienol: A new triterpene alcohol from tea seed oil. Lipids 1976, 11, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, B.; Lee, J.G.; Lim, C.J.; Jia, S.D.; Kwon, S.W.; Hwang, G.; Park, J.H. Sesquiterpenoids and 2-(2-phenylethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (=2-(2-phenylethyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one) derivatives from Aquilaria malaccensis Agarwood. Helv. Chim. Acta 2012, 95, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, R.; Fazio, G.C.; Matsuda, S.P.T. On the origins of triterpenoid skeletal diversity. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 261–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kawanishi, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Qiang, W.; Zhenwen, X. Separation of the pentacyclic triterpenes tylolupenols A and B from Tylophora kerrii. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Konda, Y.; Urano, M.; Harigaya, Y.; Takayanagi, H.; Ogura, H.; Li, X.; Lou, H.; Onda, M. Novel triterpenes, hancolupenone and hancolupenol, from Cynanchum hancokianum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990, 38, 2899–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lou, H.; Li, X.; Onda, M.; Konda, Y.; Urano, M.; Harigaya, Y.; Takayanagi, H.; Ogura, H. Stereochemistry of novel triterpenes from Cynanchum hancokianum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 2271–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takayanagi, H.; Ogura, H.; Konda, Y.; Urano, M.; Harigaya, Y.; Li, X.; Lou, H.; Onda, M. The crystal and molecular structures of hancokinol and hancolupenone from Cynanchum hancokianum (Maxim.) Al. Iljinski. (Asclepiadaceae). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shiojima, K.; Masuda, K.; Suzuki, H.; Lin, T.; Ooishi, Y.; Ageta, H. Composite constituents: Forty-two triterpenoids including eight novel compounds isolated from Picris hieracioides subsp. japonica. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 1634–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chakravarty, A.K.; Das, B.; Pakrashi, C.S.; McPhail, D.R.; McPhail, A.T. X-ray crystal structure of swertanone, a triterpene of new skeletal type from Swerfia chirata Buch-Ham. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989, 438–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lahey, F.N.; Leeding, M.V. A New triterpene alcohol, bauerenol. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1958, 342–343. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fukuoka, M.; Natori, S. Oxidation of bauerenol derivatives with chromium trioxide: Confirmation of the structure of bauerenol. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1972, 20, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Paiva Campello, J.; Marsaioli, A.J. Terebenthifolic acid and bauerenone: New triterpenoid ketones from Schinus terebenthifolius. Phytochemistry 1975, 14, 2300–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cerda-García-Rojas, C.; Hernández-Vidal, H.H.; Joseph-Nathan, P. 13C NMR assignments of D:C-friedours-7-ene derivatives. Evidence of an abnormal methyl group chemical shift. Magn. Res. Chem. 1996, 34, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chakravarty, A.K.; Das, B.; Masuda, K.; Arai, Y.; Shiojima, K. Peracid induced oxidative rearrangements of triterpenoids: Products of new skeletons from bauerenyl acetate. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6065–6078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vouffo, B.; Krohn, K.; Kouam, S.F.; Hussain, H.; Dongo, E.; Meier, K.; Schulz, B. Dinklagenonoate: A new isobauerane-type triterpenoid and other minor constituents from the twigs of Dorstenia dinklagei. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kikuchi, T.; Tanaka, A.; Uriuda, M.; Yamada, T.; Tanaka, R. Three novel triterpenoids from Taraxacum officinale roots. Molecules 2016, 21, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Talapatra, S.K.; Sengupta, S.; Talapatra, B. A new pentacyclic triterpene alcohol from Evodia franxinifolia Hook F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 57, 5963–5968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 112 are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 112 from L. acanthoclada.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 112 from L. acanthoclada.
Molecules 23 00080 g001
Figure 2. Selected HMBC (blue arrows) for compounds 1 (a); 2 (b); and 3 (c).
Figure 2. Selected HMBC (blue arrows) for compounds 1 (a); 2 (b); and 3 (c).
Molecules 23 00080 g002
Figure 3. Selected NOE effects (red arrows) for compounds 1 (a); 2 (b); and 3 (c).
Figure 3. Selected NOE effects (red arrows) for compounds 1 (a); 2 (b); and 3 (c).
Molecules 23 00080 g003
Figure 4. Possible formation of 1 from lupyl cation (I).
Figure 4. Possible formation of 1 from lupyl cation (I).
Molecules 23 00080 g004
Figure 5. Possible formation of 2 from isoursyl cation (II).
Figure 5. Possible formation of 2 from isoursyl cation (II).
Molecules 23 00080 g005
Table 1. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data a of 13 in CDCl3.
Table 1. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data a of 13 in CDCl3.
Position123
13C1H (J, Hz)13C1H (J, Hz)13C1H (J, Hz)
1a38.3, CH21.99, m35.2, CH22.79, ddd (13.5, 7.6, 4.5)33.9, CH22.30, m
1b1.43, m1.44, m1.84, m
2a35.0, CH22.74, ddd (14.4, 14.4, 5.5)34.8, CH22.55, m25.1, CH21.71, m
2b2.24, m2.48, m1.54, m
3216.9, C 217.5, C 79.8, CH4.52, dd (11.6, 4.1)
447.7, C 47.3, C 37.6, C
551.9, CH1.69, dd (9.9, 7.9)51.6, CH1.60, m47.4, CH1.72, dd (12.5, 6.8)
6a24.4, CH22.11 m21.6, CH21.72, m36.4, CH22.41, dd (18.6, 6.8)
6b1.48, m2.36, dd (18.6, 12.5)
7a117.2, CH5.53 dd (6.4, 3.2)30.5, CH22.45, m198.4, C
7b2.14, m
8145.4, C 164.1, C 139.3, C
947.9, CH2.24, m139.5, C 164.4, C
1035.4, C 37.1, C 39.2, C
11a16.6, CH21.62, m198.0, C 23.6, CH2 2.29, m
11b1.54, m2.14, m
12a32.4, CH21.54, m49.5, CH2 2.26, s29.6, CH21.50, m
12b1.40, m
1337.7, C 39.6, C 38.4, C
1440.4, C 43.1, C 40.4, C
15a28.8, CH21.32, m26.1, CH21.14, m23.8, CH21.38, m
15b1.60, m
16a34.7, CH21.49, m36.6, CH21.57, m37.8, CH21.55, m
16b1.27, m1.17, m
1740.6, C 32.3, C 31.5, C
1856.4, CH1.50, m52.2, CH1.42, brs51.5, CH1.33, brd (2.3)
1949.7, CH1.58, m36.2, CH1.02, m36.0, CH1.03, m
2035.0, CH1.55, m31.0, CH1.40, m33.1, CH1.59, m
21a28.6, CH21.77, m28.6, CH21.60, m27.9, CH21.67, m
21b1.51, m1.31,m
22a38.6, CH21.75, m31.5, CH21.26, m31.8, CH21.55, m
22b1.17, m1.26, m
2324.7, CH31.04, s27.6, CH31.11, s29.6, CH30.87, s
2421.5, CH31.12, s21.8, CH31.08, s16.0, CH30.95, s
2512.7, CH30.99, s19.8, CH31.27, s18.5, CH31.01, s
2623.5, CH31.00, s22.0, CH31.16, s21.7, CH31.22, s
2723.2, CH30.91, s18.1, CH31.01, s15.4, CH30.84, s
2833.1, CH30.92, s38.3, CH31.09, s38.1, CH31.06, s
2922.0, CH30.88, d (6.3)25.7, CH31.03, brs27.1, CH30.99, brs
3023.2, CH30.91, d (6.0)23.1, CH30.90, d (5.9)22.5, CH30.91, d (5.9)
Ac-CO 170.9, C
Ac-CH3 21.3, CH32.07, s
a Assignments aided by COSY, TOCSY, HSQC, HMBC (J = 7 and 10 Hz).

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top