Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Non-Derivatized Cellulose Samples by Size Exclusion Chromatography in Tetrabutylammonium Fluoride/Dimethylsulfoxide (TBAF/DMSO)
Previous Article in Journal
DNA G-Wire Formation Using an Artificial Peptide is Controlled by Protease Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Novel Benzyl Sulfoxide 2-Indolinone Derivatives as Anticancer Agents

Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(11), 1979; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111979
Submission received: 12 October 2017 / Revised: 13 November 2017 / Accepted: 14 November 2017 / Published: 16 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)

Abstract

:
In this work, a series of novel benzyl sulfoxide 2-indolinone derivatives was designed and synthesized as potent anticancer agents. Tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity assay indicated that most of the compounds showed significant activity. The in vitro antiproliferative activity of these compounds was further investigated against five human cancer cell lines (HeLa, HepG2, MCF-7, SCC-15, and A549). Several compounds exhibited evident activities. Among them, (Z)-3-(((4-bromobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6j) and (Z)-3-((benzylsulfinyl)methylene)-5-bromoindolin-2-one (6o) were found to be effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IC50 = 1.34 and 2.69 μM, respectively) in addition to having noteworthy antitumor potential (the average IC50 value of 6j or 6o was less than 40 μM). This class of novel derivatives has promising potential for further development as anticancer agents.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Malignant tumors threaten human health and life [1]. Conventional treatments for cancer, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, have significantly improved the prognosis and survival of cancer patients. However, several disadvantages, such as severe surgical trauma and severe damage to normal tissue cells, have stunted their therapeutic uses. Therefore, development of more specific drugs than existing ones is becoming a hot research topic supported by many governments [2,3,4].
Targeted therapy is a new approach for cancer treatment. It has some advantages, such as specificity, and few side effects, which traditional methods do not have. For targeted cancer therapies, small-molecule inhibitors of tyrosine kinase activity are ideal candidates that target tumor cells via binding to intracellular molecules [5,6,7,8,9]. In recent years, 28 small-molecule kinase inhibitors, which have been actively pursued as promising targeted therapeutics, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [10,11].
2-Indolone, also known as oxindole, is a kind of aromatic heterocyclic compound. 2-Indolone structures can be found in many natural alkaloids. For instance, indirubin, an effective component of antileukemic drugs isolated from the traditional Chinese medicine qingdai (indigo naturalis), is a bisindole antitumor drug that can inhibit the growth of multiple transplanted animal tumors [12]. After years of research, a large number of synthesized 2-indolinone derivatives have been found to show widespread biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antitumor effects [13,14]. Semaxanib (SU5416, II in Figure 1), first reported in 1996, is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug designed by Sugen as a cancer therapeutic. Semaxanib is a potent and selective synthetic inhibitor of the Flk-1/KDR vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase. It targets the VEGF pathway, and both in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated its antiangiogenic potential [15]. A related compound, SU11248 was further developed by Sugen and then by Pfizer and was FDA approved as sunitinib (Sutent) for the treatment of renal carcinoma in January 2006 [16]. Moreover, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as PHA-665752, SU11274, TSU-68 (orantinib), and BIBF-1000, were developed as antitumor drugs [17,18,19]. The majority of compounds with tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity are 3-methylene-substituted indolinones or substituted at C-3 with Schiff base structures [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Recently, our laboratory reported a new class of 2-indolinone derivatives (I in Figure 1) based on structure features derived from SU5416 (II in Figure 1). This new class of 2-indolinone derivatives exhibited excellent tyrosine kinaseinhibitory activity and anticancer activity. Among them, Indo 5 (III in Figure 1) was the most active compound that exhibited excellent biological activities both in vitro and in vivo [24]. Moreover, Indo 5 has become a preclinical anticancer drug candidate in our institution. To overcome the disadvantage of Indo 5 and obtain more effective and ideal antitumor agents, another series of novel compounds (IV in Figure 1) bearing 3-methylene-substituted indolinones were designed based on these findings. The basic tricyclic structure (including the structure of 2-indolinone and a benzene ring) was reserved because at least three rings are considered necessary for the anticancer activity. The sulfoxide group was introduced to this parent nucleus structure for the first time, due to its broad-spectrum biological activities, such as insecticidal, fungicidal, and antitumor effects.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The target compounds were synthesized via a four-step synthetic route from indolin-2-ones (1) as shown in Scheme 1. Compounds 2a2b were synthesized from indolin-2-ones and DMA-DMF as described in the literature [25]. Thiourea was employed to convert benzylic halides (3a3n) to the corresponding benzylic thiols (4a4n) in a one-pot reaction via the basic hydrolysis of isothiouronium salt [26]. Compounds 5a2p were synthesized from the reaction of 2a2b with 4a4o in the presence of TEA [25]. Finally, the sulfides 5a5p were oxidized to obtain the corresponding sulfoxides (6a6p) with H2O2 in acetic acid [27]. All the synthesized compounds were purified using recrystallization or silica gel column chromatography. The structures of the target compounds were characterized using 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and HRMS spectral analyses.

2.2. Biological Activity

The 16 designed compounds were first evaluated for tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity using ELISA assay. Indo 5 was used as a reference compound. The kit was self-made and is a very effective and economical method for preliminary tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity evaluation [28]. The IC50 values for each compound are summarized in Table 1. Apparently, most of the compounds showed significant tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity. The IC50 values of 15 compounds (6a, 6b, 6g6k, 6m6o) were much lower than that of Indo 5. Compound 6j exhibited the most potent activity with an IC50 value of 1.34 μM.
To investigate the relationship between anticancer activity and tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity, these compounds were further evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity against five cancer cell lines (human cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa, human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7, human liver carcinoma cell line HepG2, human tongue carcinoma cell line SCC-15, and human lung carcinoma A549) using MTS assay [29]. Indo 5 was also used as a reference compound. The IC50 values for each compound are summarized in Table 2.
In the cytotoxic assay, 10 compounds (6a6d, 6j, 6k and 6m6p) showed potent antineoplastic activity against the HeLa cell line. In particular, compounds 6a, 6b and 6o exhibited stronger activity than Indo 5. Four compounds (6a, 6c, 6j and 6o) showed good antitumor activity against the MCF-7 cell line. Three compounds (6d, 6j and 6o) and two compounds (6j and 6o) exhibited considerable cytotoxic activity against the HepG2 cell line and the SCC-15 cell line, respectively. Nevertheless, almost all compounds did not exhibit significant anticancer activity against the A549 cell line. Notably, the more effective compounds 6j and 6o exhibited comparable antiproliferative activity against four cancer cell lines compared with compound Indo 5. In general, most of the compounds with good tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity also showed significant anticancer activity. 6j and 6o were two of the most potent compounds. However, 6l and 6p exhibited both weak tyrosine inhibitory activity and anticancer activity. This finding implied a significant correlation between tyrosine inhibitory activity and anticancer activity.
A structure activity relationship study revealed that the introduction of methyl and halogen groups at the 2,3,4-positions of the benzene ring has no evident effect on activity, whereas an increase in activity was observed with para-bromo substitution. The presence of bromo at the 5-position of the indole ring also enhanced activity to a great extent. Unfortunately, the biological activities were simultaneously decreased due to the poor aqueous solubility of this class of sulfoxide derivatives.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemistry

All chemicals and reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers, of reagent grade, and were used without further purification. Melting points were recorded in an open capillary tube and were uncorrected. Reactions were monitored using TLC and performed on silica gel glass plates containing 60 GF-254. Visualization was achieved by UV light (λmax = 254 or 365 nm). Purification of compounds was performed using silica gel (200–300 mesh) column chromatography. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker (Palo Alto, CA, USA) AV-400 and AV-600 NMR spectrometers in DMSO-d6 with TMS as internal standard. Mass spectral data were obtained using electron spray ionization on a Micromass ZabSpec high-resolution mass spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany).
Note: Only the synthesis and characterization of target compounds are presented in this article. The intermediates mentioned in Scheme 1 are described in Supplementary Materials.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds (6a6p)

To an ice cold solution of 5a5p (1.0 mmol, 1 eq.) in 50 mL acetic acid, 30% H2O2 (1.2 mmol, 1.2 eq.) was added. Then, the reaction was heated to 40 °C for approximately 4–5 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored using TLC), the mixture was poured into ice water. The formed yellow precipitate was filtered, washed with water, and dried under vacuum. The crude product was mixed with 20 mL of anhydrous ethyl acetate and stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The solid was filtered, washed with anhydrous ethyl acetate and dried to obtaint the target compounds (6a6p).
(Z)-3-((Benzylsulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6a). Obtained in 31.1% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 191–192 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.20 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.32 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.30–7.41 (m, 6H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.86 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.649, 145.054, 143.953, 132.652, 131.857, 130.754, 128.768, 128.314, 123.012, 122.210, 121.056, 110.707, 60.339; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H14NO2S [M + H]+: 284.0745, Found: 284.0738.
(Z)-3-(((2-Fluorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6b). Obtained in 23.6% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 183–184 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.30 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 4.37 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 6.83 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.96 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.14–7.40 (m, 5H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.80 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.580, 161.998, 160.392, 144.414, 143.975, 133.266, 133.245, 133.083, 131.936, 130.620, 130.567, 124.651, 124.633, 123.054, 122.222, 121.024, 118.763, 118.662, 115.711, 115.567, 110.689, 52.692; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13FNO2S [M + H]+: 302.0651, Found: 302.0645.
(Z)-3-(((3-Fluorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6c). Obtained in 39.1% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 186–187 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.25 (d, 1H, J = 12.8 Hz), 4.36 (d, 1H, J = 12.5 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.16–7.45 (m, 5H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.775, 166.595, 163.148, 161.529, 161.438, 144.057, 143.941, 143.468, 138.142, 135.404, 134.226, 134.175, 133.327, 132.602, 132.530, 132.277, 130.868, 130.813, 130.783, 127.409, 127.226, 126.967, 123.089, 122.565, 122.437, 120.871, 119.687, 117.735, 117.590, 117.497, 117.355, 115.560, 115.456. 115.422, 115.319, 110.967, 110.935, 59.690, 57.929; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13FNO2S [M + H]+: 302.0651, Found: 302.0646.
(Z)-3-(((4-Fluorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6d). Obtained in 25.7% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 193–194 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.21 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.32 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.19–7.38 (m, 5H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.86 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.235, 165.996, 162.940, 162.828, 161.207, 144.377, 143.747, 143.589, 138.367, 134.651, 132.623, 132.566, 132.390, 132.333, 132.153, 132.100, 131.845, 131.475, 130.926, 127.609, 127.081, 126.113, 122.640, 121.812, 121.703, 120.638, 119.415, 115.430, 115.385, 115.226, 115.124, 114.147, 114.007, 110.313, 58.850, 57.098, 56.608; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13FNO2S [M + H]+: 302.0651, Found: 302.0645.
(Z)-3-(((2-Chlorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6e). Obtained in 31.6% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 202–203 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz , DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.43 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.54 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.85 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.28–7.48 (m, 5H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 10.79 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.113, 143.561, 143.526, 133.967, 133.080, 132.910, 131.566, 129.803, 129.346, 129.000, 126.969, 122.680, 121.802, 120.632, 110.258, 56.057; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13ClNO2S [M + H]+: 318.0356, Found: 318.0350.
(Z)-3-(((3-Chlorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6f). Obtained in 28.6% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 192–194 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.24 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.35 (d, 1H, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.28–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.239, 144.172, 143.636, 133.870, 132.849, 132.550, 131.526, 130.155, 130.084, 129.048, 127.848, 122.680, 121.826, 120.600, 110.323, 59.132; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13ClNO2S [M + H]+: 318.0356, Found: 318.0349.
(Z)-3-(((4-Chlorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6g). Obtained in 23.8% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 193–195 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.22 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 4.34 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.30–7.46 (m, 5H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 10.84 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.235, 144.302, 143.609, 132.789, 132.463, 132.177, 131.495, 130.376, 128.309, 122.684, 121.818, 120.620, 110.311, 58.852; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13ClNO2S [M + H]+: 318.0356, Found: 318.0349.
(Z)-3-(((2-Bromobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6h). Obtained in 50.0% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 198–199 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.46 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 4.56 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 6.86 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 7.1 Hz), 7.25–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.78 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.083, 143.529, 143.271, 133.056, 132.659, 131.582, 130.720, 129.989, 127.520, 124.781, 122.701, 121.794, 120.638, 110.256, 58.383; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13BrNO2S [M + H]+: 363.9830, Found: 363.9825.
(Z)-3-(((3-Bromobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6i). Obtained in 51.7% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 193–194 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.25 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.27 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.03 (t, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.32–7.58 (m, 6H), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 10.89 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.239, 144.176, 143.637, 134.135, 132.955, 132.548, 131.524, 130.722, 130.437, 129.414, 122.678, 121.824, 121.440, 120.595, 110.321, 59.105; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13BrNO2S [M + H]+: 363.9830, Found: 363.9826.
(Z)-3-(((4-Bromobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6j). Obtained in 40.0% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 195–196 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.21 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.33 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.27–7.60 (m, 6H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.237, 144.304, 143.616, 132.641, 132.507, 132.465, 131.493, 131.234, 130.779, 122.690, 121.816, 121.401, 120.618, 110.313, 58.905; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13BrNO2S [M + H]+: 363.9830, Found: 363.9824.
(Z)-3-(((3-Methoxybenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6k). Obtained in 32.1% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 181–182 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.73 (s, 3H,), 4.17 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.29 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.87–6.93 (m, 4H), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.27–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.60 (s, 1H,), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 10.85 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.247, 159.128, 144.589, 143.539, 132.843, 132.270, 131.451, 129.394, 122.597, 121.802, 120.668, 115.837, 113.495, 110.299, 60.004, 54.952; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C17H16NO3S [M + H]+: 314.0851, Found: 314.0845.
(Z)-3-(((2-Methylbenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6l). Obtained in 32.4% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 198–199 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.42 (s, 3H,), 4.28 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.35 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.02 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.18–7.34 (m, 5H), 7.72–7.75 (m, 2H), 10.80 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.223, 144.925, 143.470, 137.920, 132.198, 131.673, 131.467, 130.167, 129.833, 128.093, 125.763, 122.614, 121.816, 120.676, 110.293, 57.551; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C17H16NO2S [M + H]+: 298.0892, Found: 298.0894.
(Z)-3-(((3-Methylbenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6m). Obtained in 52.1% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 174–175 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.32 (s, 3H,), 4.17 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.29 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.04 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.15–7.34 (m, 5H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.255, 144.804, 143.535, 137.485, 132.200, 131.430, 131.388, 130.906, 128.568, 128.291, 127.429, 122.587, 121.806, 120.666, 110.201, 60.095; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C17H16NO2S [M + H]+: 298.0892, Found: 298.0894.
(Z)-3-(((4-Methylbenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6n). Obtained in 32.8% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 186–188 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.31 (s, 3H,), 4.15 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.27 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz), 7.17–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.86 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.249, 144.798, 143.524, 137.219, 132.171, 131.412, 130.252, 128.951, 128.321, 122.591, 121.796, 120.676, 110.293, 59.638; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C17H16NO2S [M + H]+: 298.0892, Found: 298.0894.
(Z)-3-((Benzylsulfinyl)methylene)-5-bromoindolin-2-one (6o). Obtained in 30.8% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 200–201 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.21 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 4.33 (d, 1H, J = 12.6 Hz), 6.88 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.27–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 10.87 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 166.237, 144.300, 143.618, 132.507, 132.467, 131.493,131.234, 130.779, 122.688, 121.816, 121.401, 120.618, 110.315, 58.905; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H13BrNO2S [M + H]+: 363.9830, Found: 363.9826.
(Z)-5-Bromo-3-(((2-fluorobenzyl)sulfinyl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6p). Obtained in 22.2% yield, yellow solid. m.p. 208–209 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 4.34 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 4.41 (d, 1H, J = 12.9 Hz), 6.83 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.19–7.49 (m, 5H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 10.97 (s, 1H, NH); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 165.798, 161.598, 159.960, 146.583, 142.634, 133.716, 132.874, 131.554, 130.273, 120.220, 125.429, 124.261, 122.688, 118.274, 118.173, 115.331, 115.189, 113.602, 112.212, 52.321; HRMS-ESI (m/z) Calcd. for C16H12BrFNO2S [M + H]+: 381.9736, Found: 381.9729.

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitory Activity Assay

The tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity assay was performed as described in the literature [28]. Details of the experimental procedures are presented in Supplementary Materials associated with this article. The IC50 was calculated using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Prism 5, La Jolla, CA, USA). For each concentration, at least three wells were performed to calculate the average parameter.

3.2.2. Cytotoxic Activity Assays

Cell Culture

The five types of human cancer cell lines (HeLa, HepG2, MCF-7, SCC-15, and A549) were cultured aseptically using Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin (100 units mL−1)/streptomycin (100 mg mL−1), at pH 7.2 and 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 °C. After attaining 80% confluence, the cells were trypsinized with 0.25 trypsin–EDTA and diluted with media to a fixed number of cells.

MTS Assay

Cytotoxic activity was assessed using the standard MTS method by using triplicate assay. The cells were seeded into 96-well plates containing the medium at the density of 4000–6000 cells/mL (100 μL/well). The compounds were dissolved in DMSO to the concentration of 100 mM and diluted in a culture medium to the concentrations needed. After 24 h, the cultured cells were treated with concentrations of synthesized compounds (3.125 μM to 100 μM for tumor cells) for 48 h. After 48 h of incubation, the supernatant was replaced by fresh medium (100 μL/well) and 10 μL MTS reagent ([3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt]) was added to each well. The plate was further incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The optical absorbance in individual wells was determined at 492 nm using a microplate reader. The inhibition rates were calculated by the following formula:
Inhibition rate (%) = (ODnegative control − ODsample)/(ODnegative control − ODblank) × 100%
IC50 was calculated using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Prism 5, La Jolla, CA, USA). For each concentration, at least three wells were performed to calculate the average parameter.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of novel benzyl sulfoxide 2-indolinone derivatives was synthesized and evaluated in vitro for tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity and potential cytotoxic activity against five types of cancer cell lines. Most of the compounds under investigation exhibited significant tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity. Compounds 6j and 6o not only showed significant tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity but also exhibited obvious antiproliferative activity against four tested cancer cell lines. Several compounds showed encouraging activity in some cases with interesting selectivity against the HeLa cell line relative to the other four cancer cell lines. The findings highlighted the potential of this class of derivatives as new anticancer agents. Further detailed research will be conducted to evaluate the molecular mechanism underlying the anticancer activity of these compounds. In addition, hydrophilic groups will be introduced to the parent nucleus structure to improve the aqueous solubility of the compounds to enhance their anti-tumor activity.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials are available online.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81273431) for its financial support for this project. Tremendous thanks are owed to the Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology for helping with the 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS spectral analyses.

Author Contributions

Lin Wang and Lin Tang conceived and designed the experiments. Lin Tang performed the synthetic work and the biological activity assay, interpreted the results and wrote the paper. Shouguo Zhang and Tao Peng edited the English language. Gang Wang, Xiaoxue Wen, Yunbo Sun, and Shuchen Liu contributed to the data collection and analysis. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sarkar, S.; Horn, G.; Moulton, K.; Oza, A.; Byler, S.; Kokolus, S.; Longacre, M. Cancer development, progression, and therapy: An epigenetic overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 21087–21113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dhermain, F. Radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas: Current standards and new concepts, innovations in imaging and radiotherapy, and new therapeutic approaches. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rask-Andersen, M.; Masuram, S.; Schiöth, H.B. Evaluation of the targets for drugs in clinical trials suggests major shift in molecular class and indication. Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxcol. 2014, 54, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zwick, E.; Bange, J.; Ullrich, A. Receptor tyrosine kinase signalling as a target for cancer intervention strategies. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2001, 8, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, J.; Yang, P.L.; Gray, N.S. Targetting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mendelsohn, J.; Baselga, J. Epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2006, 33, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rask-Andersen, M.; Zhang, J.; Fabbro, D.; Schiöth, H.B. Advances in kinase targeting: Current clinical use and clinical trials. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 34, 604–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hojjat-Farsangi, M. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Promising Tools for Targeted Cancer Therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 13768–13801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, P.; Nielsen, T.E.; Clausen, M.H. FDA-approved small-molecule kinase Inhibitors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 36, 422–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Schwartz, P.A.; Murray, B.W. Protein kinase biochemistry and drug discovery. Bioorg. Chem. 2011, 39, 192–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hoessel, R.; Leclerc, S.; Endicott, J.A.; Nobel, M.E.; Lawrie, A.; Tunnah, P.; Leost, M.; Damiens, E.; Marie, D.; Marko, D.; et al. Indirubin, the active constituent of a Chinese antileukaemia medicine, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1999, 1, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Gribble, G.W. Heterocycle Scaffold II: Reactions and Applications of Indoles; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; Volume 26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pavlovska, T.L.; Redkin, R.G.; Lipson, V.V.; Atamanuk, D.V. Molecular diversity of spirooxindoles. Synthesis and biological activity. Mol. Divers. 2016, 20, 299–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fong, T.A.; Shawver, L.K.; Sun, L.; Tang, C.; App, H.; Powell, T.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Schreck, R.; Wang, X.; Risau, W.; et al. SU5416 is a potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (Flk-1/KDR) that inhibits tyrosine kinase catalysis, tumor vascularization, and growth of multiple tumor types. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. O’Farrell, A.M.; Abrams, T.J.; Yuen, H.A.; Ngai, T.J.; Louie, S.G.; Yee, K.W.; Wong, L.M.; Hong, W.; Lee, L.B.; Town, A.; et al. SU11248 is a novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2003, 101, 3597–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, X.; Le, P.; Liang, C.; Chan, J.; Kiewlich, D.; Miller, T.; Harris, D.; Sun, L.; Rice, A.; Vasile, S.; et al. Potent and selective inhibitors of the Met [hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) receptor] tyrosine kinase block HGF/SF-induced tumor cell growth and invasion. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 1085–1092. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Laird, A.D.; Vajkoczy, P.; Shawver, L.K.; Thurnher, A.; Liang, C.; Mohammadi, M.; Schlessinger, J.; Ullrich, A.; Hubbard, S.R.; Blake, R.A.; et al. SU6668 is a potent antiangiogenic and antitumor agent that induces regression of established tumors. Cancer. Res. 2000, 60, 4152–4160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Chaudhary, N.I.; Roth, G.J.; Hilberg, F.; Müller-Quernheim, J.; Prasse, A.; Zissel, G.; Schnapp, A.; Park, J.E. Inhibition of PDGF, VEGF and FGF signalling attenuates fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smolen, G.A.; Sordella, R.; Muir, B.; Mohapatra, G.; Barmettler, A.; Archibald, H.; Kim, W.J.; Okimoto, R.A.; Bell, D.W.; Sgroi, D.C.; et al. Amplification of MET may identify a subset of cancers with extreme sensitivity to the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor PHA-665752. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 2316–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mologni, L.; Rostagno, R.; Brussolo, S.; Knowles, P.P.; Kjaer, S.; Murray-Rust, J.; Rosso, E.; Zambon, A.; Scapozza, L.; McDonald, N.Q.; et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationship and crystallographic studies of 3-substituted indolin-2-one RET inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1482–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kamal, A.; Shaik, A.B.; Jain, N.; Kishor, C.; Nagabhushana, A.; Supriya, B.; Bharath Kumar, G.; Chourasiya, S.S.; Suresh, Y.; Mishra, R.K.; et al. Design and synthesis of pyrazole-oxindole conjugates targeting tubulin polymerization as new anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 92, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nesi, G.; Sestito, S.; Mey, V.; Ricciardi, S.; Falasca, M.; Danesi, R.; Lapucci, A.; Breschi, M.C.; Fogli, S.; Rapposelli, S. Synthesis of Novel 3,5-Disubstituted-2-oxindole Derivatives As Antitumor Agents against Human Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Zhan, Y.; Liu, J.; Luo, T.; Yan, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, W.; Wen, X.; et al. Substance Having Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitory Activity and Preparation Method and Use Thereof. U.S. Patent 2016151334A1, 2 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. Praveen Kumar, S.; Gut, J.; Guedes, R.C.; Rosenthal, P.J.; Santos, M.M.; Moreira, R. Design, synthesis and evaluation of 3-methylene-substituted indolinones as antimalarials. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhdanko, A.G.; Gulevich, A.V.; Nenajdenko, V.G. One-step synthesis of N-acetylcysteine and glutathione derivatives using the Ugi reaction. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 4692–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chahrour, O.; Abdalla, A.; Lam, F.; Midgley, C.; Wang, S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzyl styrylsulfonyl derivatives as potent anticancer mitotic inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 3066–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Han, G.L.; Shang, N.Y.; Du, G.H. HTS model for protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. 2005, 21, 628–631. [Google Scholar]
  29. Munikrishnappa, C.S.; Puranik, S.B.; Kumar, G.V.; Prasad, Y.R. Part-1: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel bromo-pyrimidine analogs as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 119, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 6a6p are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of I, II, III and IV.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of I, II, III and IV.
Molecules 22 01979 g001
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) DMF-DMA, toluene, room temperature, 2~4 h; (b) (i) thiourea, ethanol, reflux, 10 min, (ii) sodium hydroxide solution, reflux, 1 h; (c) TEA, methanol, room temperature, 12 h; (d) H2O2, acetic acid, 40 °C, 4~5 h.
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) DMF-DMA, toluene, room temperature, 2~4 h; (b) (i) thiourea, ethanol, reflux, 10 min, (ii) sodium hydroxide solution, reflux, 1 h; (c) TEA, methanol, room temperature, 12 h; (d) H2O2, acetic acid, 40 °C, 4~5 h.
Molecules 22 01979 sch001
Table 1. The tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity of compounds 6a~6p.
Table 1. The tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity of compounds 6a~6p.
CompoundTyrosine Kinase Inhibitory Activity
IC50 (μM)
6a3.16 ± 0.31
6b3.74 ± 0.19
6c9.32 ± 0.66
6d9.30 ± 0.47
6e5.09 ± 0.12
6f5.96 ± 0.14
6g3.30 ± 0.03
6h3.52 ± 0.15
6i3.32 ± 0.19
6j1.34 ± 0.03
6k2.23 ± 0.14
6l16.02 ± 0.05
6m3.85 ± 0.09
6n4.39 ± 0.23
6o2.69 ± 0.29
6p7.93 ± 0.20
Indo 511.60 ± 0.79
Table 2. The anti-cancer activity of compounds 6a~6p.
Table 2. The anti-cancer activity of compounds 6a~6p.
CompoundHeLaMCF-7HepG2SCC-15A549
IC50 (μM)IC50 (μM)IC50 (μM)IC50 (μM)IC50 (μM)
6a11.17 ± 0.4235.18 ± 1.1652.08 ± 0.9458.85 ± 0.75>100
6b13.99 ± 0.2749.12 ± 1.0847.82 ± 1.47>100>100
6c24.37 ± 0.5431.54 ± 0.8242.02 ± 0.7049.87 ± 0.93>100
6d25.02 ± 0.6849.12 ± 0.2936.25 ± 0.5364.97 ± 1.4790.28 ± 2.14
6e70.88 ± 1.17>10096.83 ± 0.95>100>100
6f60.27 ± 1.9893.02 ± 1.5086.50 ± 1.1596.78 ± 3.76>100
6g40.92 ± 0.8892.63 ± 0.9775.35 ± 0.72>100>100
6h79.87 ± 1.57>10098.29 ± 2.04>100>100
6i48.42 ± 0.1475.06 ± 1.9371.77 ± 2.1882.14 ± 3.3464.91 ± 1.57
6j24.05 ± 0.5230.77 ± 0.2936.90 ± 0.4934.90 ± 0.3444.01 ± 1.89
6k22.67 ± 0.6459.08 ± 03749.36 ± 1.3386.72 ± 5.1662.34 ± 2.00
6l>10081.57 ± 2.62>100>100>100
6m27.03 ± 1.2041.43 ± 2.2036.04 ± 2.1350.33 ± 1.5179.32 ± 0.79
6n27.76 ± 0.7855.09 ± 1.5158.99 ± 0.9790.49 ± 2.3259.56 ± 0.97
6o18.22 ± 0.6632.34 ± 0.7754.44 ± 0.8828.63 ± 1.5854.863 ± 0.66
6p19.83 ± 0.2576.42 ± 1.50>100>100>100
Indo 519.64 ± 0.4624.19 ± 0.4922.15 ± 0.4128.16 ± 1.0829.16 ± 0.29

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, L.; Peng, T.; Wang, G.; Wen, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, L. Design, Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Novel Benzyl Sulfoxide 2-Indolinone Derivatives as Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2017, 22, 1979. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111979

AMA Style

Tang L, Peng T, Wang G, Wen X, Sun Y, Zhang S, Liu S, Wang L. Design, Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Novel Benzyl Sulfoxide 2-Indolinone Derivatives as Anticancer Agents. Molecules. 2017; 22(11):1979. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Lin, Tao Peng, Gang Wang, Xiaoxue Wen, Yunbo Sun, Shouguo Zhang, Shuchen Liu, and Lin Wang. 2017. "Design, Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Novel Benzyl Sulfoxide 2-Indolinone Derivatives as Anticancer Agents" Molecules 22, no. 11: 1979. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111979

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop