Next Article in Journal
Function Oriented Molecular Design: Dendrimers as Novel Antimicrobials
Previous Article in Journal
Concentration Effect on Quenching of Chlorophyll a Fluorescence by All-Trans-β-Carotene in Photosynthesis
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Molecules 2017, 22(10), 1587; doi:10.3390/molecules22101587

Article
Influence of Jiegeng on Pharmacokinetic Properties of Flavonoids and Saponins in Gancao
Yancao Mao 1,2,, Linxiu Peng 2,, An Kang 2, Tong Xie 1, Jianya Xu 1, Cunsi Shen 1, Jianjian Ji 1, Liuqing Di 2, Hao Wu 2,* and Jinjun Shan 1,2,*
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pediatric Respiratory Disease, Institute of Pediatrics, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of TCM, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Correspondence: Tel.: +86-25-8581-1206 (H.W.); +86-25-8581-1329 (J.S.)
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 19 August 2017 / Accepted: 19 September 2017 / Published: 21 September 2017

Abstract

:
Jiegeng Gancao decoction, which is composed of Jiegeng and Gancao at a weight ratio of 1:2, was widely used for treating pharyngalgia and cough for thousands of years. Our previous work indicated that Gancao could increase the systemic exposure of platycodin D and deapio-platycodin D, two main components in Jiegeng. However, whether Jiegeng could alter the pharmacokinetics of the main compounds in Gancao is still unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the oral pharmacokinetics of flavonoids and saponins from Gancao alone vs. after co-administration with Jiegeng. Furthermore, Caco-2 cell transport and fecal hydrolysis were investigated to explain the altered pharmacokinetic properties. Pharmacokinetics results suggested that the bioavailability of liquiritin, isoliquiritin, glycyrrhizin and its metabolite, glycyrrhetinic acid, could be improved while bioavailability of liquiritigenin and isoliquiritigenin deteriorated when co-administered with Jiegeng. The Caco-2 transport study showed no significant difference of the Papp values of the main components in Jiegeng Gancao decoction when compared with those in Gancao decoction (p > 0.05). The in vitro metabolism study suggested that saponins and flavonoids glycosides in Gancao were influenced and the metabolic characteristics of most ingredients were consistent with pharmacokinetic results, such as liquiritin and glycyrrhetinic acid. The hydrolysis of liquiritigenin and glycyrrhizin observed with fecal lysate in vitro appeared consistent with the oral pharmacokinetics. Based on experiments, the pharmacokinetic profiles of six components in Gancao were influenced by Jiegeng. The metabolic process might partially contribute to the altered pharmacokinetic behavior. The metabolism of some components of Gancao appeared to be inhibited when coadministered with Jiegeng, possibly by the Jiegeng constituent platycodin.
Keywords:
Radix platycodonis; Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch; pharmacokinetics; absorption; metabolism

1. Introduction

Licorice, also called Gancao (GC) in China, was derived from the dried roots and rhizomes of the Glycyrrhiza species. It was widely used for flavoring additives and confectionery in the food industry due to its sweet taste in most parts of the world [1,2]. Additionally, Gancao was clinically used for treating wounds, diabetes, cough, and tuberculosis in China, Japan, Korea, and India [3,4,5,6]. As the most frequently used herbal medicine worldwide, Gancao appears in about 60% of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescriptions [7,8,9] and confectionery products [10]. To date, more than 400 compounds have been isolated from Gancao, of which the main constituents being saponins and flavonoids [11], which are believed to be useful in pharmacology. Among these compounds, liquiritin (LQ), isoliquiritin (ILQ), liquiritigenin (LG), isoliquiritigenin (ILG) and glycyrrhizin (GLY) gained great attention for their validated anti-inflammatory and anti-virus effects [12,13]. The chemical structure of each compound is shown in Figure 1.
Platycodon grandiflorus, commonly named Jiegeng (JG) in China, was the root of Platycodon grandiflorum A.DC (Campanulaceae family). Traditionally, it has been consumed as food, as well as a folk remedy for ameliorating bronchitis, asthma, pulmonary tuberculosis, and inflammatory conditions [14,15,16]. To date, more than 40 triterpenoid saponins, have been reported to existing in Jiegeng [14,17,18]. Gancao was usually used together with Jiegeng to treat pharyngitis, cough, etc. [19]. Gancao and Jiegeng, at a ratio of 2:1, was first described as Jiegeng Gancao Decoction or Jiegeng Tang (JG–GC) in the medical classic ‘Shang-han-lun’ to treat abscess of lung based on its demonstrated capacity to act as an expectorant, resolving phlegm and improving air flow to the lungs [20]. It was reported that these two plants had a distinct synergistic effect working as an anti-inflammatory and eliminating phlegm [21].
Several studies have investigated the pharmacokinetics of the flavonoids and saponins of Gancao [22,23]. Based on these studies, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the main active components of Gancao, liquiritin, liquiritigenin and glycyrrhizic acid, were systematically determined. However, the effects of Jiegeng on the pharmacokinetics of the active components in Gancao were still unclear.
In this study, the influence of Jiegeng on the pharmacokinetics of five active constituents—liquiritin, isoliquiritin, liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin and glycyrrhizin and one metabolite of glycyrrhizin, glycyrrhetinic acid (GA)—in Gancao were evaluated. Furthermore, Caco-2 cell transport and fecal hydrolysis experiments were employed to investigate the absorptive and metabolic behavior of the six active components mentioned above in Gancao alone and in Jiegeng Gancao decoction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Oral Pharmacokinetics Study

The pharmacokinetic parameters and mean plasma concentration–time profiles were presented in Table 1 and Figure 2.
Among the four flavonoids, we noticed that the AUC(0–t) (AUC: area under the curve) of LQ and ILQ, two flavonoid glycosides, increased in the presence of Jiegeng in different ways. The AUC(0–t) of LQ increased about 3.6 times (p < 0.05), while the value of ILQ increased about 1.8 times (p > 0.05). In contrast, the AUC(0–t) of LG and ILG, two flavonoid aglycones, decreased, with the AUC(0–t) of LG decreasing by 42.9% (p < 0.01), while the value AUC(0–t) decreased by 40.3% (p < 0.05) for ILG when co-administered with Jiegeng. In a similar manner to the flavonoid glycosides, the AUC (0–t) of GLY and its metabolite GA also increased significantly, with the AUC(0–t) of GLY and GA increasing about 3.0 times (p < 0.05) and 2.9 times (p < 0.05), respectively. These results indicate that Jiegeng might significantly improve the bioavailability of glycosides, including flavonoids (LQ and ILQ) and saponins (GLY and GA), while Jiegeng may decrease the bioavailability of LG and ILG in Gancao.
Another obvious difference could be observed from the time–concentration profiles of GLY and GA. The Tmax of GLY was significantly prolonged by 12.38 times in JG–GC (p < 0.05), meanwhile, the Cmax of GA markedly increased about 2.5 times (p < 0.05) when combined with Jiegeng. This suggests that more GLY was metabolized into GA under the influence of Jiegeng during this prolonged period. In summary, the AUC of LQ, ILQ, GLY and GA in the JG–GC group increased by 3.6, 1.8, 3.0, and 2.9-fold, respectively, while the AUC of LG and ILG decreased compared to the GC group. Previous work revealed that Gancao can increase the AUC of platycodin D by six times [24], in this study, more evidence has been added indicating that main components in the two herbs may interact after oral administration. To determine the alterations to the pharmacokinetic characteristics between the GC group and the JG–GC groups, two in vitro drug absorption and metabolism models were applied to investigate the potential herb–herb interaction.

2.2. Transcellular Transport of LQ, LG and GLY across Caco-2 Cell Monolayer

The cytotoxicity of the JG–GC on the Caco-2 cells was determined through a MTT test (a method of detecting cell survival and growth) prior to carrying out the transport experiments. The concentration and corresponding cell viability was calculated for each substance to determine the optimum concentration—those not exhibiting cytotoxicity where the living rate of cells above 80 percent—to use in transportation assays.
According to Papp for the analytes, as shown in Table 2 and Figure 3, LG exhibited good permeability (Papp > 10−5 cm/s), suggesting that LG could be easily absorbed. Meanwhile, the Papp values of LG and GLY increased with the extension of time in each group. However, obvious differences did not exist between LG alone and LG combined with GC or JG–GC. This result demonstrated that there were no other ingredients in Jiegeng or in Gancao that affected the absorption of GLY and LG. Conversely, the Papp value of LQ, a flavonoid glycoside in Gancao, was less than 10−6 cm/s in the LQ without GC or JG–GC but increased in the GC and JG–GC groups, however, no difference appeared between these two groups. The results mentioned above suggest that LQ has poor absorption and some ingredients in Gancao could promote the absorption of LQ.
The absorptions of the main active ingredients in Gancao were not significantly changed after co-administration with Jiegeng, indicating that pharmacokinetic characteristic changes were not a result of drug absorption.

2.3. Hydrolysis of LQ, LG and GLY in Fecal Lysates

Observations of the metabolic profiles (Figure 4) of LQ in the four groups indicate that LQ could be metabolized, for the most part within 2 h. However, the metabolic rate increased slightly in the LQ or LQ–JG group. These phenomena suggest that some ingredients in Gancao inhibited the hydrolysis of LQ. LG, the aglycone of LQ, could not be hydrolyzed in the fecal lysates, but converted from LQ, with the aid of intestinal flora, as previous research reported [25]. This conclusion was validated through the growth trend profiles of LG in six different groups. As shown in Figure 3, the concentration of LG was stable after 2 h in each group, with the exception of the GC and JG–GC groups. Meanwhile, the concentration of LG increased in varying degrees between the GC and JG–GC groups, indicating that some other components could be hydrolyzed to LG, except LQ. For example, isoliquiritin and isoliquiritigenin, two main flavonoids in Gancao, could be converted to LG via metabolism and isomerization [26].
About 50% GLY was metabolized into GA as GLY alone or co-administered with Jiegeng within 0.5 h in the fecal lysates. In contrast, the metabolic rate of GLY decreased in both the GC and JG–GC groups. Furthermore, the concentration of GLY in the JG–GC group decreased rapidly in comparison to the GC group. These results could be verified using the profiles of GA in each group, with many reports demonstrating that GA is the secondary metabolite of GLY by intestinal flora [27]. As our previous research reported, the hydrolysis of platycodin D is inhibited in JG–GC group [24], and it deserves further experimentation to explore this interaction.
In summary, the metabolism of some active components in Gancao has changed in rat fecal lysates after co-administration with Jiegeng. β-d-Glucosidase existing in fecal could hydrolyze the saponins and flavone glycosides, inhibiting or promoting the metabolism of some substances [28], with the action of other ingredients in the drug. This might be an important factor responsible for the changed pharmacokinetic profiles of the active ingredients in JG–GC.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Materials

Reference compounds of liquiritin (LQ), isoliquiritin (ILQ), liquiritigenin (LG), isoliquiritigenin (ILG), glycyrrhizin (GLY), glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and hesperidin (internal standard, IS) were purchased from National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products (Beijing, China). The purity of each compound was more than 98% (HPLC). The two plant materials of Gancao and Jiegeng were purchased from Nanjing Yifeng Pharmacy (Nanjing, China) and were authenticated by Dr. Shengjin Liu (Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China).
HPLC-grade acetonitrile was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and formic acid with a purity of 99% was of HPLC grade (ROE, Newark, NJ, USA). Deionized water (18 MΩ) was prepared by a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA) for UHPLC analysis and all solutions or dilutions. Other reagents and chemicals were of analytical grade. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1% EDTA-1.25% trypsin (EDTA/trypsin), penicillin-streptomycin, nonessential Amino Acids and Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution without Calcium & Magnesium (HBSS) were all obtained from Gibco Laboratory (Invitrogen Co, Grand Island, NY, USA).

3.2. Preparation of Sample Extracts

Jiegeng Gancao decoction (JG–GC) was composed of Jiegeng (100 g) and Gancao (200 g), and the plants were immersed in 13-fold deionized water for 0.5 h and then decocted to boil for 2 h. The extracted solution was filtered through two layers of gauze. Ethanol was added to precipitate the polysaccharide and protein. This sample was kept for 24 h at 4°C and then filtered through the filter paper. Finally, the filtrate was concentrated to obtain JG–GC with a final concentration of 3.0 g/mL (equivalent to dry weight of raw materials). Gancao decoction (GC, 200 g) was prepared as the above identical procedure, and the final concentration was 2.0 g/mL. All the extracts were kept in −70 °C until use.

3.3. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing 200 ± 20 g) were supplied by the Animal Core Facility of Nanjing Medical University (Certificate No. SCXK-2008-0033) and kept in the laboratory condition (temperature, 22 ± 2 °C; relative humidity, 45~60%). The animals were acclimatized to the facilities for 3 days, and then fasted for 12 h but allowed free access to water prior to experiment. The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Animal Ethic Committee of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine.

3.4. Pharmacokinetic Study

The rats were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 6 per group), including JG–GC group and GC group. Rats were administrated with JG–GC or GC at oral dose at 30 g/kg and 20 g/kg. The concentration of LQ, ILQ, LG, ILG and GLY in JG–GC and GC were determined using our validated UHPLC method, and the contents of these compounds in JG–GC and GC were shown in Table 3. About 250 µL blood samples were collected into heparinized tubes via the postorbital venous plexus veins at 0.083, 0.167, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after drug administration.
The samples were immediately centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 6 min, and 100 µL of plasma was spiked with 10 µL IS solution (92 ng/mL) by vortexing for 2 min. All analytes could be extracted from plasma with one-step precipitation by adding 300 µL methanol and vortexing for 5 min. The well-vortexed solutions were centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 10 min. Finally, 5 µL of the supernatant was injected into the UHPLC-MS/MS system for analysis.
To obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters of the six analytes, the time-concentration data was processed by non-compartmental analysis (DAS 3.2.6 software, Chinese Pharmacological Association, Beijing, China). The pharmacokinetic parameters, including Tmax, Cmax, t1/2, AUC (0–t), and AUC(0–∞) of the four flavonoids (LG, ILG, LQ, ILQ) and two saponins (GLY, GA) in both groups were calculated and compared. The data was presented as mean ± SD for each group, if not specified otherwise. Significance is assessed by Student’s t-test, with p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

3.5. Cell Culture

The human colon adenocarcinoma cell line, Caco-2, cells were obtained from the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (Shanghai, China). Cell passages from the 30th to 60th generations were used in the experiment. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 90% relative humidity, growing routinely on 75 cm2 plastic culture flasks (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in DMEM, with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acid solution, and 1% (v/v) penicillin–streptomycin. The medium was replaced every 2–3 days after incubation. The cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/cm2 onto a permeable polycarbonate insert (0.6 cm2, 0.45 μm pore size, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in 24-well tissue culture plates (NUNC, Roskilde, Denmark) and grown for 21 days before the transporter experiment. The resistances of monolayers were assessed using Millcell ERS-2 transmembrane resistance meter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) on days 3, 5, 10, 14, 18 and 21. The transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) values were calculated to examine its integrity. Only the Millicell membranes with monolayer cells that met the defined criteria with TEER values above 300 Ω·cm2 were used for transport studies.

3.6. Transport of LQ, LG and GLY across Caco-2 Cell Monolayer

The Caco-2 cell monolayers were washed three times with HBSS (pH 7.4), and placed in a shaking incubator for 30 min to remove impurities. The transport study was conducted by adding 0.4 mL of LQ solution (1.4 µg/mL), LG solution (0.4 µg/mL), GLY solution (5.2 μg/mL), GC solution and JG–GC solution. The concentration of each analyte in the GC and JG–GC solutions was measured to be equal to the targeted analyte. Furthermore, the difference was statistically negligible. These solutions were applied to the apical side of the cell monolayer, with 0.6 mL of blank HBSS applied to the basolateral side. Aliquots of 0.1 mL and 0.15 mL of samples were taken sequentially from the donor and receiver sides, respectively, after shaking at 50 rpm for 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min. Drug solutions and HBSS medium were added to the apical or basolateral side immediately to compensate for volume lost due to sampling. A 10 μL internal standard (92 ng/mL of hesperidin in acetonitrile) was added to 100 µL of sample, and the mixture was vortexed for 5 min. All samples were nitrogen-dried and reconstituted with 20 μL methanol for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
The apparent unidirectional permeability, from apical to basolateral side (Papp(a-b)), was calculated according to the following equation: Papp= [(dQ/dt)]/[A × C0], where the dQ/dt (µg/min) was the drug permeation rate, A was the cross sectional area (0.6 cm2), and C0 (µg/mL) was the initial concentration of each drug solution in the donor compartment at t = 0 min.

3.7. Fecal Lysates Preparation

Fresh feces were collected from ten male normal SD rats, of which about 1 g was immediately mixed with 9 mL ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4), and vortexed for 5 s followed by filtering through four layers of gauze. For preparing fecal lysates, the filtrate was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 min. The pellet was re-dissolved in 10 mL ice-cold PBS, and the mixture was sonicated in an ice water bath for 45 min, followed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min. All supernatant was stored at −70 °C.

3.8. Metabolism of LQ, LG and GLY in Fecal Lysates

Thawed fecal lysates (100 µL) were transferred to disposable glass vials, and then 10 µL of each drug solution with 90 µL PBS was added to obtain a 200 µL incubation volume. The concentrations of the analytes in the drug solutions are listed in Table 4. The mixture was shaken at 37 °C, and samples of 100 µL were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h, after which 10 µL of 92 ng/mL hesperidin was added. The mixture was vortexed for 2 min and centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was injected into the UHPLC/MS-MS to determine the remaining concentration of each analyte. The experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.9. Quantification of Flavonoids and Saponins in Biological Matrices

The UHPLC-MS/MS was an ultimate 3000 series UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA), consisting of a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a vacuum degasser, and a statically controlled column apartment equipped with a Thermo scientific quantum vantage™ mass spectrometer system (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA), which coupled with an electrospray Ionization (ESI) source. All data was analyzed by Xcalibur Software from Thermo-Fisher Scientific. Flavonoids and saponins in Gancao and hesperidin were monitored in the negative mode (ESI−). Some significant mass spectrometry parameters, such as spray voltage, shealth gas pressure, aux gas pressure, vaporizer temperature and capillary temperature were set at 3.0 kV, 45 arb, 25 arb, 450 °C and 350 °C, respectively. The Q1 and Q3 quadrupoles were set at unit resolution with different collision energy (CE) and S-lens. The quantification was performed by the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) of the transitions of m/z 254.964–134.939 for LG/ILG (CE of 18 eV; S-lens at 64 V), 416.996–254.947 for LQ/ILQ (CE of 22 eV; S-lens at 93 V), 821.134–350.827 for GLY (CE of 39 eV; S-lens at 160 V), 469.120–425.289 for GA (CE of 37 eV; S-lens at 160 V) and m/z 609.200–301.100 for hesperidin (CE of 27 eV; S-lens at 129 V), respectively. The chromatographic analysis was achieved on a Hypersil Gold C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.9 µm particle size; Thermo, San Jose, CA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.05% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The UHPLC gradient system began with 15% B at 0–1 min, 15–70% B at 1–6 min, and 70–100% B at 6–7 min. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C, while the sample-tray temperature was kept at 4 °C.
The UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of LQ, ILQ, LG, ILG, GLY and GA in rat plasma, HBSS buffers and fecal lysates have been studied [24] and the methods have been validated, respectively. Other substances did not interfere with the detection of these components in each biological sample. The intra- and inter-batch precision and accuracy were < 20% for all quality control samples. In addition, all the substances tested in each biological matrix were stable, and the linear range and LLOQ of each analyte in different samples are shown in Table 5.

4. Conclusions

The in vivo process of drug research plays a major role in exploring the material basis of traditional Chinese medicine. This study investigated the in vivo and in vitro interaction of the active ingredients in Jiegeng Gancao decoction systematically from the aspects of pharmacokinetics, absorption and metabolism, elucidating the integral mechanism for drug combination. The result of the Caco-2 cell transport experiment showed that the Papp of the main active ingredients were the same between Gancao alone and Jiegeng Gancao decoction, which indicated that the absorption of the active ingredients was not affected after combination with Jiegeng. However, microbial metabolism of Gancao saponin and flavonoid glycosides were inevitably influenced when co-administrated with Jiegeng. Consequently, the altered pharmacokinetics between the GC and JG–GC groups may be attributable to microbial metabolism, rather than intestinal absorption. In summary, these results provided in vivo evidence of the efficacy of this herbal combination and its potential for clinical application.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81774156, 81001499).

Author Contributions

J.S., H.W. and L.D. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.M. performed the experiments; A.K. and T.X. analyzed the data; J.X., C.S. and J.J. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; L.P. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kao, T.C.; Wu, C.H.; Yen, G.C. Bioactivity and potential health benefits of licorice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, H.M.; Sugimoto, N.; Akiyama, T.; Maitani, T. Constituents and their sweetness of food additive enzymatically modified licorice extract. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 6044–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alrushaid, S.; Davies, N.M.; Martinez, S.E.; Sayre, C.L. Pharmacological characterization of liquiritigenin, a chiral flavonoid in licorice. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Ren, L. Study on pharmacological activity of effective components of glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch. Biotechworld 2016, 5, 227. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, R.; Wang, L.Q.; Yuan, B.C.; Liu, Y. The pharmacological activities of licorice. Planta Med. 2015, 81, 1654–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, M.F.; Shen, Y.Q. Research advances in pharmacologic effects of licorice and its active components in hypoglycemia. Anti-Infect. Pharm. 2015, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, L.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yu, L.; Yang, J.; Wan, H. Effects of active components of fuzi and gancao compatibility on bax, bcl-2, and caspase-3 in chronic heart failure rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2016, 2016, 7686045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, Q.; Shi, L.; Tang, X.; Wang, Q.; Dang, X.; Zhang, Y. Pharmacokinetic study of multiple active constituents from kushen-gancao decoction after oral administration in rat by hplc-ms/ms. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 965, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhou, B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.; Zhuo, Q.; Gao, W.; Hao, J.; Man, S. The influence of compatibility of processed radix aconiti kusnezoffii on the pharmacokinetic of four components in glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 169, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A.; Aracil, P.; Garcia, E.; Burlo, F.; Martinez-Sanchez, F. Source of arsenic in licorice confectionery products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1749–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Ye, M. Chemical analysis of the chinese herbal medicine gan-cao (licorice). J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 1954–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ohno, H.; Araho, D.; Uesawa, Y.; Kagaya, H.; Ishihara, M.; Sakagami, H.; Yamamoto, M. Evaluation of cytotoxiciy and tumor-specificity of licorice flavonoids based on chemical structure. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 3061–3068. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, J.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Zhao, Y. Effects of space flight on the chemical constituents and anti-inflammatory activity of licorice (glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch). Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2012, 11, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Li, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Han, Y.; Tian, Y.H.; Zhang, G.S.; Sun, Y.S.; Wang, Y.P. Platycodin d isolated from the aerial parts of platycodon grandiflorum protects alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 1418–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Y.; Wang, J.T.; Gui, S.Y.; Qu, H.F. Progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of platycodon grondiflonm. Food Drug 2016, 18, 72–75. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, N.; Li, M.; Liu, Y. Platycodon grandiflorus—An ethnopharmacological, phytochemical and pharmacological review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 164, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fu, W.W.; Dou, D.Q.; Pei, Y.H. Review on chemical components and bioactivities of platycodon grandiflorum. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ. 2006, 23, 184–191. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, W.J.; Xu, X.D.; Wei, J.H.; Yang, J.S. Advances in studies on chemical constituents of triterpenoid saponins from platycodon grandiflorum. Chin. Pharm. J. 2008, 43, 801–804. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, X.Y.; Zhu, G.W. Study on the correlation between compatibility and pharmacodynamics of campanulaceae and glycyrrhiza uralensis. China’s Naturop. 2014, 22, 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shan, J.J.; Zou, J.S.; Xu, J.Y.; Yu, J.H.; Di, L.Q.; Wang, S.C. Research advances of jiegeng tang. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2012, 18, 304–306. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, B.; Qi, Y.; Song, Y.; Cai, R.L.; Wang, M.; Xie, C.; Luo, X.Z. Combination of saponins of glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch( gs)and platycodon grandiflorum A. Dc(ps)for duration of effect. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2007, 13, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng, J.; Di, L.Q.; Shan, J.J.; Zhao, X.L.; Kang, A.; Bi, X.L.; Li, J.S. Studies on effects of achyranthes bidentata on tongsaimai pellets main active ingredients chlorogenic acid, isoliquiritin, harpagoside and glycyrrhizin in vivo pharmacokinetics. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2014, 39, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, Y.P.; Meng, X.S.; Bao, Y.R.; Wang, S. Pharmacokinetic study of four flavones of glycyrrhiza in rat plasma using hplc-ms. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shan, J.J.; Zou, J.S.; Xie, T.; Kang, A.; Zhou, W.; Xu, J.Y.; Shen, C.S.; Du, L.N.; Wang, S.C.; Di, L.Q. Effects of gancao on pharmacokinetic profiles of platycodin D and deapio-platycodin D in jiegeng. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 170, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, W.; Jiang, S.; Qian, D.; Shang, E.X.; Duan, J.A. Effect of liquiritin on human intestinal bacteria growth: Metabolism and modulation. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.Y.; Jiang, Z.Z.; Zhang, L.; Chai, X.; Wang, Y.F. Characterization of metabolites of liquirtigenin in rats by uplc-q-tof/ms. Tianjin J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2015, 32, 757–762. [Google Scholar]
  27. Akao, T. Effects of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetic acid on the growth, glycyrrhizin beta-d-glucuronidase and 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase of human intestinal bacteria. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dong, S.Q.; Fan, H.R.; Li, Q.S.; Wei, G.L.; Liu, W.H.; Si, D.Y. In vivo metabolic pathway of liquiritin in rats. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2014, 45, 2499–2505. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of six components in Gancao and the relationship of between them are annotated in the figure as appropriate.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of six components in Gancao and the relationship of between them are annotated in the figure as appropriate.
Molecules 22 01587 g001
Figure 2. Time–concentration profiles of LQ, ILQ, LG, ILG, GLY and GA in rat plasma from Group 1 ( Molecules 22 01587 i001): JG–GC (30 g/kg, p.o.); Group 2 ( Molecules 22 01587 i002): GC (20 g/kg, p.o.). The upper right corner of each drug curve shows the corresponding drug profile within 2 h.
Figure 2. Time–concentration profiles of LQ, ILQ, LG, ILG, GLY and GA in rat plasma from Group 1 ( Molecules 22 01587 i001): JG–GC (30 g/kg, p.o.); Group 2 ( Molecules 22 01587 i002): GC (20 g/kg, p.o.). The upper right corner of each drug curve shows the corresponding drug profile within 2 h.
Molecules 22 01587 g002
Figure 3. Papp profiles for the analytes in different groups (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 3. Papp profiles for the analytes in different groups (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Molecules 22 01587 g003
Figure 4. Hydrolysis of Gancao constituents in rat fecal lysates (mean ± SD; n = 3).
Figure 4. Hydrolysis of Gancao constituents in rat fecal lysates (mean ± SD; n = 3).
Molecules 22 01587 g004
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the analytes in rat plasma after oral administration of Gancao (GC) and Jiegeng (JG)–GC (mean ± SD, n = 6).
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the analytes in rat plasma after oral administration of Gancao (GC) and Jiegeng (JG)–GC (mean ± SD, n = 6).
ParameterLQILQLG
GCJG–GCGCJG–GCGCJG–GC
Cmax (ng/mL)2.48 ± 72.6294 ± 52.445.9 ± 14.535.6 ± 7.0847.9 ± 9.2437 ± 9.79
t1/2 (h)2.02 ± 0.902.54 ± 0.814.78 ± 0.842.93 ± 0.892.80 ± 0.192.54 ± 0.81
Tmax (h)0.14 ± 0.0430.13 ± 0.0460.25 ± 0.090.33 ± 00.78 ± 0.051.29 ± 0.05
AUC(0–t) (ng/mL·h)301.9 ± 58.11104.5 ± 270 *75.3 ± 17.6136 ± 36.5533.3 ± 191.8304.4 ± 59.1 **
AUC(0–∞) (ng/mL·h)303 ± 58.41106 ± 269 *76.6 ± 17.2137 ± 36.5545 ± 213262 ± 55.6 **
ParameterILGGLYGA
GCJG–GCGCJG–GCGCJG–GC
Cmax (ng/mL)45.2 ± 13.317.3 ± 5.09 *4102 ± 13075190 ± 12283109 ± 10077848 ± 1862 *
t1/2 (h)3.37 ± 0.334.41 ± 1.043.03 ± 0.483.43 ± 0.874.22 ± 0.876.00 ± 1.78
Tmax (h)1.56 ± 0.251.78 ± 0.0960.39 ± 0.114.83 ± 0.89 *11.3 ± 1.6311.3 ± 1.63
AUC(0–t) (ng/mL·h)201.8 ± 54.4120.4 ± 31.5 *13,530.7 ± 403841,241.1 ± 10,290 *40,353.5 ± 9018.2117,529.5 ± 20,640.3 *
AUC(0–∞) (ng/mL·h)205 ± 52.9129 ± 21.513,532 ± 403741,248 ± 10,284 *40,418 ± 8993118,998 ± 21,515 *
*: JG–GC vs. GC, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01.
Table 2. The Papp values for the analytes in different groups (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Table 2. The Papp values for the analytes in different groups (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Time (min)Papp-LQ (1 × 10−6 cm/s)Papp-LG (1 × 10−6 cm/s)Papp-GLY (1 × 10−6 cm/s)
LQGCJG–GCLGGCJG–GCGLYGCJG–GC
300.18 ± 0.012.03 ± 0.51 **2.95 ± 0.47 ##9.80 ± 0.789.48 ± 1.358.98 ± 0.701.91 ± 0.231.94 ± 0.202.08 ± 0.21
600.37 ± 0.073.63 ± 0.47 **3.71 ± 0.84 ##16.70 ± 3.3015.30 ± 5.3213.50 ± 0.192.90 ± 0.073.10 ± 0.203.03 ± 0.41
900.46 ± 0.134.90 ± 0.85 **4.63 ± 0.23 ##26.10 ± 0.2328.30 ± 2.1226.30 ± 2.154.57 ± 0.294.19 ± 0.294.24 ± 0.26
1200.88 ± 0.105.96 ± 0.38 **5.65 ± 0.40 ##46.00 ± 3.0746.70 ± 1.5047.30 ± 3.154.91 ± 0.054.91 ± 0.185.08 ± 0.32
**: GC vs. LQ, ** < 0.01; ##: JG-GC vs. GC, ## < 0.01.
Table 3. Concentration of the analytes in JG–GC and GC.
Table 3. Concentration of the analytes in JG–GC and GC.
AnalyteLQILQLGILGGLY
(μg/mL)(μg/mL)(μg/mL)(μg/mL)(μg/mL)
JG–GC(3 g/mL)710060020007026,000
GC(2 g/mL)750056022007026,500
Table 4. Concentration of the analytes in each group.
Table 4. Concentration of the analytes in each group.
GroupLQ (ng/mL)LG (ng/mL)GLY (ng/mL)
JG–GC (1.5 mg/mL)3550100013,000
GC (1 mg/mL)3750150013,250
LQ3500//
LG/900/
GLY//13,200
LQ+JG3500//
LG+JG/900/
GLY+JG//13,200
Table 5. Linear ranges and LLOQs of analytes in different biological matrixes.
Table 5. Linear ranges and LLOQs of analytes in different biological matrixes.
AnalyteRat PlasmaHBSS BufferFecal Lysates
Linear RangeLLOQLinear RangeLLOQLinear RangeLLOQ
(ng/mL)(ng/mL)(ng/mL)(ng/mL)(ng/mL)(ng/mL)
LG0.43–3300.430.54–11000.542.15–22002.15
ILG0.41–3150.41
LQ0.47–3600.471.47–30001.471.47–15001.47
ILQ0.40–3060.4
GLY10.26–787510.263.96–81003.965.27–54005.27
GA14.64–11,25014.64 2.93–30002.93
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top