Next Article in Journal
Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Luculia pinceana Flower and Its Changes at Different Stages of Flower Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Ethyl Acetate Abatement on Copper Catalysts Supported on Ceria Doped with Rare Earth Oxides
Previous Article in Journal
Repellent Activity of the Essential Oil from the Heartwood of Pilgerodendron uviferum (D. Don) Florin against Aegorhinus superciliosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Causes of Activation and Deactivation of Modified Nanogold Catalysts during Prolonged Storage and Redox Treatments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Subnanometric Ag Species, Their Interaction with Supports and Role in Catalytic CO Oxidation

by
Yulia Kotolevich
1,
Ekaterina Kolobova
2,
Evgeniy Khramov
3,
Jesús Efren Cabrera Ortega
4,
Mario H. Farías
1,
Yan Zubavichus
3,
Rodolfo Zanella
5,
Josué D. Mota-Morales
1,6,
Alexey Pestryakov
2,
Nina Bogdanchikova
1 and
Vicente Cortés Corberán
7,*
1
Departamento de Fisicoquímica de Nanomateriales, Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ensenada 22860, Mexico
2
Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk 634050, Russia
3
National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow 123182, Russia
4
Departamento de Fisica Aplicada, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Mexico
5
Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México, DF 04510, Mexico
6
CONACYT Research Fellow at Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, UNAM, Ensenada 22860, Mexico
7
Institute of Catalysis and Petroleumchemistry (ICP), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Madrid 28049, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(4), 532; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040532
Submission received: 6 February 2016 / Revised: 7 April 2016 / Accepted: 15 April 2016 / Published: 22 April 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coinage Metal (Copper, Silver, and Gold) Catalysis)

Abstract

:
The nature and size of the real active species of nanoparticulated metal supported catalysts is still an unresolved question. The technique of choice to measure particle sizes at the nanoscale, HRTEM, has a practical limit of 1 nm. This work is aimed to identify the catalytic role of subnanometer species and methods to detect and characterize them. In this frame, we investigated the sensitivity to redox pretreatments of Ag/Fe/TiO2, Ag/Mg/TiO2 and Ag/Ce/TiO2 catalysts in CO oxidation. The joint application of HRTEM, SR-XRD, DRS, XPS, EXAFS and XANES methods indicated that most of the silver in all samples is in the form of Ag species with size <1 nm. The differences in catalytic properties and sensitivity to pretreatments, observed for the studied Ag catalysts, could not be explained taking into account only the Ag particles whose size distribution is measured by HRTEM, but may be explained by the presence of the subnanometer Ag species, undetectable by HRTEM, and their interaction with supports. This result highlights their role as active species and the need to take them into account to understand integrally the catalysis by supported nanometals.

1. Introduction

The discovery of the extraordinary catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles for oxidation reactions compared to that of the bulk metal sparked the interest on the influence of the metal particle size at the nanometer scale on the catalytic performance of noble metal-based catalysts. In the literature, there are publications describing catalysts active at low temperature that contain both particles undetectable by ТЕМ and, in the other extreme, very large particles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Difficulties in the interpretation of such results are associated with the limited information provided by the routine physical and chemical research methods of characterization (e.g., XRD and TEM).
Over the last 20 years, only a few papers have explained the atypical behavior of catalysts by the presence of ultra-small particles of gold, i.e., subnanometer clusters [9,10,11,12,13] and atomically dispersed single-site cations [14,15]. Modern microscopes, such as aberration-corrected high angle annular dark field scanning transmission microscope (ac-HAADF/STEM), enable one to capture ultra-small particles and atoms [14,16]. Another approach for subnanometer clusters’ detection is by combining the use of multiple research methods, both more common ones (TPR, UV-VIS) and advanced ones (EXAFS, XANES, XPS, DFT).
Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al. leached out Au NPs and showed that gold nanoparticles on various supports are not active in the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction [14,17,18,19,20]; they are only “spectators” or, in other words, inactive “fillers”. Only atomically-dispersed gold cations are the active species, even if they contribute only 3%–10% to the total gold content [19]. These cations were characterized (XPS, EXAFS, XANES, TPR, ac-HAADF/STEM, DFT, etc.), and their catalytic activity was tested after removing weakly-bound clusters and nanoparticles (spectators) by cyanide leaching.
In previous works of our group, the activity of gold catalysts containing particles in the range of 20–700 nm in CO hydrogenation below 400 °C could be attributed to the presence of subnanometer clusters [12,13]. The existence of these clusters was revealed by combining methods, such as UV-VIS, HRTEM and calculations of XRD data with Rietveld refinement [21,22,23]. Conversely, gold nanoparticles were found to be active for the water-gas shift reaction in other works. Their activity depended on the particle size and the type of interactions established with the support [24,25,26,27]. Furthermore, the catalytic activity strongly depended on the method of preparation that, in turn, affected the support used for dispersing the metal.
In contrast to gold, works dedicated to silver subnanometer species are very few. Currently, studies by different groups explain the activity of the silver catalysts supported on SiO2 and Al2O3 by the presence of subnanometer silver clusters, which were detected by the FTIR of adsorbed CO (FTIR CO) [28,29,30,31,32] and UV-VIS [32,33,34].
The present work aims to further the field of catalytic properties of subnanometer species and methods to detect them. Our specific goal was to investigate the catalytic properties of silver deposited on active supports composed by TiO2, modified with oxides of Mg, Fe and Ce, for CO oxidation. This is an important reaction from both a fundamental viewpoint and practical application to, among others, environmental protection, safety in industrial and residential premises and inside vehicles. The differences found among the catalysts in sensitivity to redox pretreatments could not be explained considering the Ag particle size distributions measured by HRTEM in the interval 1–12 nm, but were explained by the existence of Ag species with size <1 nm non-visible in HRTEM and their interaction with supports.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the results of catalytic tests for as-prepared silver catalysts, the second run and after redox pretreatments. According to the literature, oxides, in particular ceria and titania, are not simple spectators, as they can affect the catalytic activity by participating directly in the reaction [31,32] or by modifying the chemical properties of the supported metal [35,36]. However, it can be seen in our case that bare Ce/TiO2 and Mg/TiO2 supports do not show significant conversion under the conditions studied. For Ag/Ce/TiO2, the light-off curves of catalytic reaction matched the typical S-shaped curve. For Ag/Mg/TiO2, there is a combination of a curve with a maximum (at low temperatures) and an S-shaped curve (at high temperatures). This effect, caused by both supported silver [2,16] and gold [37,38,39,40,41] catalysts, is explained in the literature as due to the activity of small clusters and larger particles, at low temperatures and at high temperatures, respectively. It can be seen that light-off curves for as-prepared Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Fe/TiO2 samples are similar; consequently, the contents of active species in them were comparable (Figure 1). Pretreatments revealed differences in their catalytic behaviors. Light-off curves for Ag/Mg/TiO2 samples as-prepared and after different pretreatments vary considerably, while those for Ag/Ce/TiO2 turn out to be almost identical. The changes among all light-off curves for Ag/Fe/TiO2 represented an intermediate case.
Different complementary physical and chemical characterization methods were used to investigate the causes of the differences in catalytic behavior. Table 1 shows that the specific surface area of modified supports and catalysts are similar, and the content of Ag is identical for all catalysts, which ruled out these characteristics (SBET and Ag content) as the source of their distinct catalytic performance.
The particle size distribution for silver catalysts, calculated from HRTEM images, is displayed in Figure 2. An extremely narrow particle size distribution centered at 1 nm is observed for Ag/Fe/TiO2 (Figure 2a,b). The histogram for Ag/Mg/TiO2 (Figure 2c) is broader, with an average size of 5.5 nm. The range of particle sizes (3–12 nm) of Ag/Ce/TiO2 (Figure 2d) is also broad and shifted to larger sizes compared to the other samples, with an average particle size of 7.2 nm. HRTEM of the modified supports is presented in Figure 2e–g. For all studied supports, no contrasting particles related to modifiers were found on TiO2. Consequently, it can be inferred that modifiers are distributed homogeneously in the form of subnanometer species.
Figure 3 shows the diffraction lines for the modified supports and Ag catalysts. It can be seen that SR-XRD patterns are practically the same for modified supports and the corresponding Ag catalysts. For all catalysts, reflections corresponding to the crystalline silver phase were not detected in their SR-XRD patterns (Figure 3). This suggests that silver is either amorphous or that its crystallite size is below the SR-XRD detection limit (2 nm). These results confirm the HRTEM data for the Fe-modified samples: all particles in Ag/Fe/TiO2 has a size of 2 nm or less.
As the particle sizes’ range recorded by the HRTEM was 3–12 nm, i.e., larger than the SR-XRD detection limit, one could expect silver phases in Ag/Ce/TiO2 to be detectable by SR-XRD; however, the diffraction lines for silver were absent. This indicates that the silver crystallites’ size is <2 nm and that the HRTEM histogram is representative of only a small part of the silver present in Ag/Ce/TiO2.
What could cause the formation of large particles in Ag/Ce/TiO2 is an interesting question. From low-magnification HRTEM micrograph and corresponding elemental maps in false colors for Ag and Ce extracted from the EDS data, it can be seen that silver in Ag/Ce/TiO2 corresponds to both large and small particles (Figure 4). Cerium is distributed over the surface quite uniformly, which is in agreement with the HRTEM of Ce/TiO2. Elemental maps in false colors for Ag and Ce extracted from the EDS data and HRTEM of Ce/TiO2 indicate the absence of large CeO2 particles. It allows attributing the CeO2 diffraction line of very low relative intensity (Figure 3) to ~10-nm CeO2 crystallites, which represent only a small part of CeO2 total content. Hence, 3–12-nm particles of the HRTEM histogram of Ag/Ce/TiO2 correspond to Ag particles, not to CeO2 ones. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that small silver particles were also registered by the EDS data.
Figure 3 shows that the reflections corresponding to the modifier were only detected for Ag/Ce/TiO2. Despite the fact that the molar concentrations of the modifiers were the same in the three modified supports, the higher molecular weight of CeO2 resulted in a higher mass ratio, which exceeds the weight content of other additives and explains the appearance of the corresponding peaks. CeO2 is in the form of large particles (~10 nm, as estimated by the Scherrer method).
To confirm the hypothesis, based on SR-XRD results, of the presence of silver species with size <1 nm in Ag/Ce/TiO2, we took advantage of a DRS method [41,42,43,44]. It provides an easy registration of silver clusters of <1 nm by absorption bands around 260–290 nm, Ag+ cations at 250 nm and nanoparticles at about 400 nm. Particles of 1–1.5 nm (quasi-metallic particles) are characterized by unstructured absorbance above 400 nm. The absorption characteristic of these quasi-metallic species is similar to that of colloidal silver as a consequence of increasing particle size from atomic and molecular scales to the bulk metal one [45].
As can be seen in Figure 5, the intense absorption peaks of the support (200–300 nm) are observed in the same region as those of Ag cations and clusters for the catalysts. This hinders the application of this method for investigating these Ag species. Catalysts after H2 treatment exhibit the unstructured absorbance corresponding to quasi-metallic silver particles with a size of about 1–1.5 nm. As no significant differences were observed in the visible range of the spectra of all catalysts, it can be concluded that the differences in activity after H2 pretreatments are not caused by quasi-metallic silver particles with a size of about 1–1.5 nm. DRS results (as SR-XRD) also indicate that in all samples, most of the Ag is in the form of species with size <1.5 nm. The large contribution of Ag species with size <1.5 nm in the three catalysts, measured by DRS, is in good agreement with the HRTEM histogram for Ag/Fe/TiO2 (Figure 2a). However, for Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2, these DRS data show that their HRTEM histograms represent only part of the actual sizes distributions, and they do not include Ag species <1.5 nm.
XPS spectra of the Ag 3d5/2 lines of the catalysts are presented in Figure 6. Ag 3d5/2 peaks required deconvolution for all samples, because their widths exceed those corresponding to a single state. Table 2 shows that most silver (80%) in Ag/Ce/TiO2 is in cationic form (BE = 365.7 eV [46,47,48]), while in Ag/Fe/TiO2, its contribution is 14%, and in Ag/Mg/TiO2, cationic silver was not registered. Supports modified with Ce and Fe oxides are able to stabilize cationic silver, because these additives exhibit electron-acceptor properties, while Mg oxide is electron-donor [29,44,49,50]. Furthermore, note that ceria nanoparticles are able to provide oxygen dissociation, pointing out differences between Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Fe/TiO2 regarding their catalytic properties [36,51,52].
XPS results indicate that the extent of strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) for Ag follows the trend: Ag/Ce/TiO2 > Ag/Fe/TiO2 > Ag/Mg/TiO2. The nature of SMSI for Ag species is discussed in more detail below. It should be noted that the initial TiO2 support is a mixture of two phases: rutile and anatase. Figure 7 shows that all of the lattice constants of both phases, obtained from the EXAFS data, of the initial TiO2 decreased when modifiers were added. Taking into account the low modifier content (<6 wt %), one may conclude that modifiers are quite uniformly distributed throughout the TiO2 structure and that they strongly interact with TiO2. EXAFS results also showed that the rutile phase contribution increased 4%, 5% and 6% after modification with Ce, Fe and Mg oxide, respectively. The change of the rutile/anatase ratio (bulk properties) after modification is known to occur [53]. Details of the discussion of the influence of modification on the rutile/anatase ratio and lattice constants exceed the allocated extension of this paper and will be published elsewhere.
The XPS study of various forms of oxygen and carbon showed differences in the number and contribution of oxygen and carbon surface states on the modified supports (Figure 8a,с). While for TiO2, Mg/TiO2 and Ce/TiO2, very similar C1s and O1s profiles, for Ag/Fe/TiO2, a big change in both is observed, indicating a strong interaction of iron oxide with the original support. Hence, the interaction modifier-TiO2 is the strongest for Ag/Fe/TiO2.
Silver addition caused redistribution of oxygen and carbon states (Figure 8b,d). New peaks of C1s and O1s with a significant contribution appeared for Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Fe/TiO2, while for Ag/Mg/TiO2, minimal changes of the investigated surface states are observed compared to TiO2 and Mg/TiO2. This proves the SMSI in the Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Fe/TiO2 catalysts and a weaker interaction in Ag/Mg/TiO2. This can be the reason for the formation of small quasi-metallic silver particles with a size of 1 nm on Fe/TiO2 and even smaller subnanometer silver species on Ce/TiO2.
The results of XANES and EXAFS methods for the studied catalysts and reference compounds (metallic silver and bulk silver oxide) are presented in Figure 9, and their evaluation is in Table 3. For these methods, we focus our attention on analyzing the results for Ag/Fe/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2. Data for Ag/Ce/TiO2 were not analyzed, because XPS data (Table 2) showed that 80% of Ag is in the cationic form, not registered by XANES and EXAFS methods. Ag2O species with coordination numbers 2.5 and 2.6 were detected for Ag/Fe/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2, respectively. This indicates that Ag2O species are very small. Their contribution is higher in Ag/Mg/TiO2 (90 mol %) compared to Ag/Fe/TiO2 (62 mol %). Consequently, there are smaller particles in Ag/Mg/TiO2. The Ag/Fe/TiO2 sample contains more metallic particles characterized by a significantly higher coordination number (five), which is closer to that of bulk metal (12) than that for Ag/Mg/TiO2 (2.2).
This evidences that metallic particles in Ag/Mg/TiO2 are smaller than in Ag/Fe/TiO2, which is again in contradiction to HRTEM data (Figure 2). This in turn indicates that Ag species of less than 1 nm do exist in Ag/Mg/TiO2, but they were not registered by HRTEM. These species can include cations (as shown by XPS data), as well as metallic and oxide clusters (as evidenced from XPS, XANES and EXAFS data). Coordination numbers from EXAFS data indicate that the silver particle sizes in Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2 are similar, whereas those in Ag/Fe/TiO2 are larger. This is in agreement with DRS, SR-XRD and XPS data. Hence, the analysis of the results of all applied methods showed that HRTEM histograms of Ag/Ce/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2 only reflect part of the Ag particles, those are excluding subnanometer Ag species.
Turning back to XPS data, it is worthy to note that the position of the Ag 3d5/2 peak for Ag/Fe/TiO2 (368.1 eV) is on the limit of the typical positions for Ag2O and Ag0. Probably, this Ag 3d5/2 peak is typical for 1 nm Ag quasi-metallic particles, which composes the main part of this sample. We did not find in the literature data for Ag 3d5/2 BE for 1-nm Ag quasi-metallic particles. Therefore, probably, our data can be considered as some of the first ones for their characterization. The interpretation of the peaks below 369 eV observed for Ag/Fe/TiO2 and Ag/Mg/TiO2 is also difficult, because this BE interval is not well identified in the literature. Kim’s group [54,55] suggested that this interval is characteristic for Ag clusters with size <2 nm supported on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite. Thus, Ag/Fe/TiO2 contains mainly quasi-metallic Ag particles of 1 nm, those <2 nm Ag clusters and a small contribution of silver cations. Thus, for this catalyst, HRTEM and XPS data are in good agreement. Spectra of Ag/Mg/TiO2 can be interpreted as composed by Ag0 (BE = 368.3 eV [48]), Ag2O (BE = 367.5 eV [48]) and clusters with a size <2 nm. XPS data showed that 80% of surface silver is in the Ag+ state. This is in good agreement with HRTEM of Ce/TiO2, EDS, DRS and SR-XRD.
Oxidized silver states were observed for all catalysts. This confirms the effective interaction of silver with supports. As Fe and Ce oxides exhibit electron-acceptor properties, while Mg oxide has electron-donor ones, their interaction with silver can modify its oxidation state. For Ag/Mg/TiO2, the transfer of electron density from Mg oxide to silver occurs with stabilization of 52% of silver in the reduced state, and the contribution from Ag+ is not detected. In contrast, in Ag/Ce/TiO2, 80% of surface silver is stabilized as Ag+. Ag/Fe/TiO2 is an intermediate case; only 14% of silver is in the form of Ag+ cations. In Ag/Ce/TiO2 catalyst, 100% of the surface silver is in oxidized states. These results confirm that the HRTEM Ag/Ce/TiO2 histogram (Figure 2d) corresponds only to a small part of silver particles.
Catalysts’ investigation by these physicochemical methods showed that, firstly, the HRTEM histogram for Ag/Fe/TiO2 (Figure 2) is the most exact, while for Ag/Mg/TiO2 and Ag/Ce/TiO2, besides Ag nanoparticles with sizes from 1–12 nm, Ag species with size <1 nm, non-visible in HRTEM, exist. Thus, the majority of Ag species in all samples has sizes ≤1 nm. Secondly, the strength of interaction between Ag and support decreases as follows: Ag/Ce/TiO2 > Ag/Fe/TiO2 > Ag/Mg/TiO2.
The majority of Ag species in all samples have size ≤1 nm; consequently, differences in the catalytic activity cannot be explained by differences in Ag species size, but can be caused by the difference in the SMSI. For Ag/Ce/TiO2, the activity was very stable for all pretreatments (Figure 1). This can be explained by the fact that this sample has the most SMSI. On the contrary, for Ag/Mg/TiO2, activity was very sensitive to the type of pretreatment. This can be due to the weak interaction of Ag species with support. The behavior of Ag/Fe/TiO2 presents an intermediate case as far as catalytic activity and SMSI are concerned.
The existence of small silver species, active for an industrially-important reaction, such as CO oxidation, has been suggested in other works [1,28]. In this work, Ag subnanometer species in Ag/Mg/TiO2 and Ag/Ce/TiO2 catalysts were for the first time detected and then characterized by using several physicochemical techniques. The catalytic performance can actually be enhanced if deactivation of subnanometer silver species, that are active at low temperatures, is prevented. This prevention can be done by increasing of SMSI by way of selecting the type of modifier and improving its distribution on the support surface.
This work represents the continuation of studies where catalytic properties of silver catalysts could not be explained by particle size distributions measured by HRTEM and are explained by existence of small silver species. Works dedicated to this matter are very few; we found only four publications [12,13,14,15]. Below, we briefly describe them.
Undetected small silver clusters have been suggested as the source of specific catalytic properties [1,2,3,4]. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al. [33] explained the catalytic properties in the reduction of NO with methane by the coexistence of highly dispersed clusters (<2 nm) of oxidized silver and embedded Ag ions, which are active in selective reduction of CH4, but low active in CH4 combustion. The presence of small clusters was detected by the absorption band at 350 nm, typical for Agnδ+ in diffuse reflectance UV spectra. The unusual behavior of silver on SiO2 catalysts was observed after oxidizing and reducing pretreatments in CO oxidation [28]. During reduction in H2 at 100–300 °C, oxidized silver species were redispersed, leading to the remarkable activity in CO oxidation. The existence of small silver species was detected by the FTIR of adsorbed CO [28]. It was shown that silver species could not be completely reduced to the metallic state, even after reduction by H2 at 500 °C.
The present work shows deep insights into the existence of Ag species with size ≤1 nm, non-detectable in HRTEM, as in the works previously mentioned. Combination of HRTEM, SR-XRD, DRS, XPS, EXAFS and XANES methods allowed us to detect and characterize these Ag species and to estimate the strength of their interaction with supports. These results led to concluding that the sensitivity of CO oxidation catalysts to pretreatments depends on the strength of the interaction of Ag species with supports. The combination of these methods can be used not only for detection and characterization of subnanometer metallic species in catalysts, but also for other materials used in various fields, such as sensors [56].
Activation-deactivation of the active component after different pretreatments can be caused by many factors, such as encapsulation, agglomeration, redispersion, carbonization, reduction-oxidation, etc. In the case of small particles, in addition to these factors, deactivation due to SMSI that is not strong enough should not be forgotten.
Under conditions that favor the formation of small supported species (say, high specific surface areas of supports, low metal concentration and active supports), the particle size distribution obtained from HRTEM results can be apparent, in other words, not correct. They can represent only part (in some cases, an extremely low part [29]) of all of the supported metal, because HRTEM registers particles ≥1 nm and does not register those ones with size <1 nm. Analysis and discussions of catalytic data taking into account these histograms can lead to the wrong conclusions. With the more widespread application of ac-HAADF/STEM to identify subnanometer species, it is expected that soon, this technique will become a routine procedure. At the moment, only a few researchers use this method for catalyst characterization. However, even in the case of the application ac-HAADF/STEM, its combined use with XPS, DRS and EXAFS is still much recommended, because they allow measuring a relatively big amount of the material and provide average characteristics, while ac-HAADF/STEM can be non-representative, especially for samples with an inhomogeneous component distribution. Moreover, complimentary information about charge, oxidation state, etc., obtained by these techniques would be enriching.
This work is one of the few paying attention to the problem of the identification and characterization of subnanometer species undetectable by HRTEM. This phenomenon should take the adequate place in nanoscience.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalysts Preparation

Titania Degussa P25 (Evonik’s Chemicals Business Area, Essen, Germany) was used as the support (45 m2·g−1, nonporous, 70% anatase and 30% rutile, purity >99.5%). Before preparation, titania was dried in air at 100 °C for at least 24 h. Modification of titania with a molar ratio Ti/modifier = 40 was made by impregnation (2.5 cm3/g) of initial TiO2 with aqueous solutions of modifier (M) precursors, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and Mg(NO3)2, from Aldrich (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Impregnated supports were dried at room temperature for 48 h and then at 110 °C for 4 h and finally calcined at 550 °C for 4 h.
Commercial AgNO3 from Aldrich was used as the silver precursor. Catalysts Ag/M/TiO2 with 2.2 wt % Ag nominal loading were prepared by deposition precipitation with NaOH in the absence of light following the previously-reported procedure [57,58,59].

3.2. Catalytic Tests

For catalytic CO oxidation measurements, 0.5 g of the catalyst were packed in a quartz flow reactor. A first run of reaction was accomplished with as-prepared samples. Then, catalysts were cooled down in a reaction mixture, and then, the second run was performed. Alternatively, pretreatments in hydrogen or oxygen flow (30 mL/min) at 300 °C for 1 h were applied to the catalyst prior to the test. The catalytic reaction was conducted with a 200-mL/min flow rate of the reactant gas mixture 1% vol. O2, 1% vol. CO in Ar and with temperature increase from 30–305 °C in 15 °C steps every 20 min. The products were analyzed by gas chromatograph CHROMOS GC–1000, equipped with a TCD, and using two separate packed columns filled with CaA (to analyze oxygen and hydrogen) and AG-3 sorbent (to analyze both carbon oxides), respectively, and He as the carrier gas.

3.3. Samples’ Characterization

Catalysts, either as-prepared or pretreated in hydrogen at 300 °C for 1 h, were studied by diffuse reflectance UV-VIS spectroscopy (DRS) with a CARY 300 SCAN (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) spectrophotometer. Optical spectra presented in this work were obtained by subtraction of the spectra of pure supports from the spectra of silver samples.
Prior to any characterization described below, the samples were pretreated in hydrogen at 300 °C for 1 h. The textural properties of samples were determined from nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms (−196 °C) recorded with a TriStar 3000 apparatus (Micromeritics, Norgross, GA, USA). Prior to experiments, samples were degassed at 300 °C in a vacuum for 5 h.
Silver contents were measured by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the JEOL-5300 scanning electronic microscope with a Kevex Superdry detector (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) studies were carried out using a JEM 2100F microscope operating with a 200-kV accelerating voltage. The samples were ground into a fine powder and dispersed ultrasonically in hexane at room temperature. Then, a drop of the suspension was put on a lacey carbon-coated Cu grid. At least ten representative images were taken for each sample. A particle size distribution was obtained by counting ca. 100 particles for each sample. Сhemical analysis of surface carried out by spectroscopy of dispersion energy (EDS) with X-Max detector (80 mm2) (Oxford Instruments, Oxfordshire, UK).
Synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (SR-XRD) experiments were carried out as described in [60]. Diffraction patterns of powdered materials were taken in transmission at λ = 0.68886 Å, using an Imaging Plate 2D detector (exposure time: 30 min). In some cases, full Rietveld analysis [61,62] was carried out using the Jana2006 program [60].
XAFS experiments were carried out as described in [60]. The XANES spectra were taken in transmission. Primary processing of XAFS spectra was done using the IFEFFIT software package [63,64]. Extended analysis (EXAFS) was carried out only for the EXAFS spectra taken in situ at room temperature. The Fourier transforms were analyzed for k = 2.0–11.6 Å−1 with the weight coefficient k3 using the phases and amplitudes of photoelectrons scattering calculated in terms of the FEFF8 software [65].
The samples were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with a SPECS GmbH custom-made system using a PHOIBOS 150 WAL hemispherical analyzer and a non-monochromated X-ray source (SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH, Berlin, Germany). All of the data were acquired using Al Kα X-rays (1486.6 eV, 200 W). A pass-energy of 50 eV, a step size of 0.1 eV/step and a high-intensity lens mode were selected. The diameter of the analyzed area was 3 mm. Charging shifts were referenced against the Ti 2p3/2 peak of TiO2 at 458.8 eV. The pressure in the analysis chamber was maintained lower than 1 × 10−8 mbar. The accuracy of the binding energy (BE) values is ±0.1 eV. Spectra are presented without smoothing or background subtraction, with intensity in counts per second (CPS). Peak areas were estimated by calculating the integral of each peak after subtracting a Shirley-type background and fitting the experimental peak to a combination of Lorentzian/Gaussian lines with a 30/70 proportion and keeping the same width on all lines.

4. Conclusions

Differences in sensitivity to oxidative and reductive pretreatments was revealed for Ag/Fe/TiO2, Ag/Mg/TiO2 and Ag/Ce/TiO2 catalysts in CO oxidation. The observed phenomena could not be explained taking into account the Ag particle size distributions measured by HRTEM in the interval 1-13 nm. However, they can be explained by the existence of Ag species with size <1 nm, non-visible in HRTEM, and their interaction with the supports. The present work is one of the few to address the problem of the identification and characterization of such subnanometer species undetectable by HRTEM and highlights their role as active species and the need to take them into account to understand integrally the catalysis by supported nanometals.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Government Program “Science” of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Grant No. 4.1187.2014/K, CONACYT Project 260409 and PAPIIT-UNAM Project IT200114 (Mexico), CSIC project 201480E077 and MINECO Project CTQ2013-41507-R (Spain). We gratefully thank O. Martynyuk, G. Torres Otañez, Z. I. Bedolla Valdez, E. Flores, F. Ruiz Medina, A. Olivas Sarabia, I. Gradilla, J. Mendoza, E. M. Aparicio Ceja, J. Peralta, David A. Domínguez, M. Sainz, R. Valdez Castro, M. Martínez, B. Acosta Ruelas, F. Ramírez Hernández and M. López Cisneros for valuable technical assistance.

Author Contributions

M.H. Farías, Y. Zubavichus and A. Pestryakov conceived of and designed the experiments. Y. Kotolevich, E. Kolobova E. Khramov and J. E. Cabrera Ortega performed the experiments. Y. Kotolevich and R. Zanella contributed synthesis procedures. Y. Kotolevich, M. H. Farias, V. Cortés Corberán, A. Pestryakov and N. Bogdanchikova analyzed the data. Y. Kotolevich, J. D. Mota-Morales, V. Cortés Corberán, A. Pestryakov and N. Bogdanchikova wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ac-HAADF/STEMaberration-corrected high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy
BEbinding energy
CPSCounts per second.
DFTdensity functional theory
DRSdiffuse reflectance spectroscopy in ultraviolet and visible diapason
EDSenergy dispersive spectroscopy
EXAFSextended X-ray absorption fine structure
FTIR COFourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed CO.
HRTEMhigh resolution transmission electron microscopy
SMSIstrong metal-support interaction
SR-XRDsynchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction
TCDthermal conductivity detector
TPRtemperature-programmed reduction
UV-VISultraviolet-visible spectroscopy
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,
XANESX-ray absorption near edge structure
WGSwater-gas shift reaction

References

  1. Zhu, H.; Ma, Z.; Clark, J.C.; Pan, Z.; Overbury, S.H.; Dai, S. Low-temperature CO oxidation on Au/fumed SiO2-based catalysts prepared from Au(en)2Cl3 precursor. Appl. Catal. A. 2007, 326, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bondarchuk, I.S.; Mamontov, G.V. Role of PdAg Interface in Pd–Ag/SiO2 Bimetallic Catalysts in Low Temperature Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide. Kinet. Catal. 2015, 56, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mamontov, G.V.; Knyazev, A.S.; Paukshtis, E.A.; Vodyankina, O.V. Adsorption and conversion of ethylene glycol on the surface of Ag containing catalyst modified with phosphate. Kinet. Catal. 2013, 54, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Martynova, D.O.; Kibis, L.S.; Stonkus, O.A.; Vodyankina, O.V.; Izaak, T.I.; Slavinskaya, E.M.; Boronin, A.I. Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Porous Blocked Ag/SiO2 Composites in Low Temperature Carbon Monoxide Oxidation. Kinet. Catal. 2013, 54, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morgan, K.; Inceesungvorn, B.; Goguet, A.; Hardacre, C.; Meunier, F.C.; Shekhtman, S.O. TAP studies on 2% Ag/c–Al2O3 catalyst for selective reduction of oxygen in a H2-rich ethylene feed. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2128–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guerba, H.; Djellouli, B.; Petit, C.; Pitchon, V. CO oxidation catalyzed by Ag/SBA-15 catalysts: Influence of the hydrothermal treatment. C. R. Chim. 2014, 17, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Inceesungvorn, B.; López-Castro, J.; Calvino, J.J.; Bernal, S.; Meunier, F.C.; Hardacre, C.; Griffin, K.; Delgado, J.J. Nano-structural investigation of Ag/Al2O3 catalyst for selective removal of O2 with excess H2 in the presence of C2H4. Appl. Catal. A Gene. 2011, 391, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lippits, M.J.; Gluhoi, A.C.; Nieuwenhuys, B.E. A comparative study of the effect of addition of CeOx and Li2O on c-Al2O3 supported copper, silver and gold catalysts in the preferential oxidation of CO. Top. Catal. 2007, 44, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Imaoka, T.; Kitazawa, H.; Chun, W.-J.; Yamamoto, K. Finding the Most Catalytically Active Platinum Clusters With Low Atomicity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9810–9815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Berr, M.J.; Schweinberger, F.F.; Döblinger, M.; Sanwald, K.E.; Wolff, C.; Breimeier, J.; Crampton, A.S.; Ridge, C.J.; Tschurl, M.; Heiz, U. Size-selected Subnanometer Cluster Catalysts on Semiconductor Nanocrystal Films for Atomic Scale Insight into Photocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5903–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vilar-Vidal, N.; Rivas, J.; Lopez-Quintela, M.A. Size dependent catalytic activity of reusable subnanometer copper(0) clusters. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1693–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pestryakov, A.N.; Lunin, V.V.; Kharlanov, A.N.; Bogdanchikova, N.E.; Tuzovskaya, I.V. Electronic state of gold in supported clusters. Eur. Phys. J. D 2003, 24, 307–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bogdanchikova, N.; Pestryakov, A.; Farias, M.H.; Diaz, J.A.; Avalos, M.; Navarrete, J. Formation of TEM- and XRD-undetectable gold clusters accompanying big gold particles on TiO2-SiO2 supports. Solid State Sci. 2008, 10, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.; Gates, B.C. Atomically Dispersed Supported Metal Catalysts. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2012, 3, 545–574. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, S.; Zhang, G.; Gauquelin, N.; Chen, N.; Zhou, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, W.; Meng, X.; Geng, D.; Banis, M.N.; et al. Single-atom Catalysis Using Pt/Graphene Achieved through Atomic Layer Deposition. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Allard, L.F.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.; Overbury, S.H. Behavior of Au Species in Au/Fe2O3 Catalysts Characterized by Novel In Situ Heating Techniques and Aberration-Corrected STEM Imaging. Microsc. Microanal. 2010, 16, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lessard, J.D.; Valsamakis, I.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Novel Au/La2O3 and Au/La2O2SO4 catalysts for the water–gas shift reaction prepared via an anion adsorption method. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4857–4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, Y.; He, G.; Akey, A.J.; Si, R.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.; Herman, I.P. Raman Analysis of Mode Softening in Nanoparticle CeO2-δ and Au-CeO2-δ during CO Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12952–12955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Gold Atoms Stabilized on Various Supports Catalyze the Water Gas Shift Reaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, M.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Herron, J.A.; Xu, Y.; Allard, L.F.; Lee, S.; Huang, J.; Mavrikakis, M.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Catalytically active Au-O(OH)x species stabilized by alkali ions on zeolites and mesoporous oxides. Science 2014, 364, 1498–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Carabineiro, S.A.C.; Chen, X.; Martynyuk, O.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Avalos-Borja, M.; Pestryakov, A.; Tavares, P.B.; Orfao, J.J.M.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Figueiredo, J.L. Gold supported on metal oxides for volatile organic compounds total oxidation. Catal. Today 2015, 244, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carabineiro, S.A.C.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Pestryakov, A.; Tavares, P.B.; Fernandes, L.; Figueiredo, J.L. Gold nanoparticles supported on magnesium oxide for CO oxidation. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Carabineiro, S.A.C.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Avalos-Borja, M.; Pestryakov, A.; Tavares, P.B.; Figueiredo, J.L. Gold supported on metal oxides for carbon monoxide oxidation. Nano Res. 2011, 4, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shekhar, M.; Wang, J.; Lee, W.-S.; Williams, W.D.; Min Kim, S.; Stach, E.A.; Miller, J.T.; Delgass, W.N.; Ribeiro, F.H. Size and Support Effects for the Water-Gas Shift Catalysis over Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Model Al2O3 and TiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4700–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rodriguez, J.A.; Senanayake, S.D.; Stacchiola, D.; Liu, P. Hrbek, The Activation of gold and the water-gas shift reaction: Insights from Studies with model catalysts. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hussain, A.; Gracia, J.; Nieuwenhuys, B.E.; Niemantsverdriet, J.W. (Hans) Explicit roles of Au and TiO2 in a bifunctional Au/TiO2 catalyst for the water-gas shift reaction: A DFT Study. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 2479–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boccuzzi, F.; Chiorino, A.; Manzoli, M.; Andreeva, D.; Tabakova, T. FTIR Study of the low-temperature water-gas shift reaction on Au/Fe2O3 and Au/TiO2 Catalysts. J. Catal. 1999, 188, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qu, Z.; Huang, W.; Cheng, M.; Bao, X. Restructuring and Redispersion of Silver on SiO2 under Oxidizing/Reducing Atmospheres and Its Activity toward CO Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15842–15848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pestryakov, A.N.; Lunin, V.V. Physicochemical study of active sites of metal catalysts for alcohol partial oxidation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 158, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tabakova, T.; Boccuzzi, F.; Manzoli, M.; Chiorino, A.; Andreeva, D. Characterization of nanosized gold, silver and copper catalysts supported on ceria. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2005, 155, 493–500. [Google Scholar]
  31. Boccuzzi, F.; Chiorino, A.; Manzoli, M.; Andreeva, D.; Tabakova, T.; Ilieva, L.; Iadakiev, V. Gold, silver and copper catalysts supported on TiO2 for pure hydrogen production. Catal. Today 2002, 75, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Keshavaraja, A.; She, X.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Selective catalytic reduction of NO with methane over Ag-alumina catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2000, 27, L1–L9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kolobova, E.; Pestryakov, A.; Shemeryankina, A.; Kotolevich, Y.; Martynyuk, O.; Tiznado Vazquez, H.J.; Bogdanchikova, N. Formation of silver active states in Ag/ZSM-5 catalysts for CO oxidation. Fuel 2014, 138, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bogdanchikova, N.; Tuzovskaya, T.; Pestryakov, A.; Susarrey-Arce, A. Comparative study of formation and stabilization of gold and silver clusters and nanoparticles in mordenites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11, 5476–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Green, I.X.; Tang, W.; Neurock, M.; Yates Jr, J.T. Spectroscopic Observation of Dual Catalytic Sites During Oxidation of CO on a Au/TiO2 Catalyst. Science 2011, 333, 736–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Parka, J.B.; Graciani, J.; Evans, J.; Stacchiola, D.; Ma, S.; Liu, P.; Nambu, A.; Fernández Sanz, J.; Hrbeka, J.; Rodriguez, J.A. High catalytic activity of Au/CeOx/TiO2(110) controlled by the nature of the mixed-metal oxide at the nanometer level. PNAS 2009, 106, 4975–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ma, Z.; Yin, H.; Dai, S. Influence of Preparation Methods on the performance of metal phosphate-supported gold catalysts in CO Oxidation. Catal. Lett. 2010, 138, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, Z.; Yin, H.; Overbury, S.H.; Dai, S. Metal Phosphates as a New Class of Supports for Gold Nanocatalysts. Catal. Lett. 2008, 126, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pestryakov, A.N.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Simakov, A.; Tuzovskaya, I.; Jentoft, F.; Farias, M.; Díaz, A. Catalytically active gold clusters and nanoparticles for CO oxidation. Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 3792–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pestryakov, A.; Tuzovskaya, I.; Smolentseva, E.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Jentoft, F.C.; Knop-Gericke, A. Formation of gold nanoparticles in zeolites. Int. J. Modern Phys. B 2005, 19, 2321–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Smolentseva, E.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Simakov, A.; Pestryakov, A.; Avalos, M.; Farias, M.H.; Tompos, A.; Gurin, V. Catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles incorporated into modified zeolites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 1882–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bogdanchikova, N.; Meunier, F.C.; Avalos-Borja, M.; Breen, J.P.; Pestryakov, A. On the nature of the silver phases of Ag/Al2O3 catalysts for reactions involving nitric oxide. Appl. Catal. B 2002, 36, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pestryakov, A.N.; Lunin, V.V.; Bogdanchikova, N.E.; Petranovskii, V.P.; Knop-Gericke, A. Supported foam-silver catalysts for alcohol partial oxidation. Catal. Commun. 2003, 4, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pestryakov, A.N.; Bogdanchikova, N.E.; Knop-Gericke, A. Alcohol selective oxidation over modified foam-silver catalysts. Catal. Today. 2004, 91–92C, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ershov, B.; Abkhalimov, E.; Sukhov, N. Formation of Long-Lived Clusters and Silver Nucleation in the g-Irradiation of Aqueous Silver Perchlorate Solutions Containing Polyphosphate. High Energ. Chem. 2005, 39, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rtimi, S.; Baghrichea, O.; Sanjines, R.; Pulgarina, C.; Bensimonc, M.; Kiwi, J. TiON and TiON-Ag sputtered surfaces leading to bacterial inactivation under indoor actinic light. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2013, 256, 52–63. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mejia, I.M.; Marín, M.; Sanjines, R.; Pulgarín, C.; Mielczarski, E.; Mielczarski, J.; Kiwi, L. Magnetron-sputtered Ag-modified cotton textiles active in the inactivation of airborne bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wagner, C.D.; Riggs, M.; Davis, E.; Müllenberg, G. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer Corp. Physical Electronics Division: Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1979; pp. 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pestryakov, A.N.; Davydov, A.A. Active electronic states of silver catalysts for methanol selective oxidation. Appl. Catal. A 1994, 120, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pestryakov, A. Modification of silver catalysts for oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde. Catal. Today 1996, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, F.; Graciani, J.; Evans, J.; Liu, P.; Hrbek, J.; Sanz, J.F.; Rodriguez, J.A. CO Oxidation on inverse CeOx/Cu(111) catalysts: High catalytic activity and ceria-promoted dissociation of O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3444–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rao, K.N.; Bharali, P.; Thrimurthulu, G.; Reddy, B.M. Supported copper–ceria catalysts for low temperature CO oxidation. Catal. Commun. 2011, 11, 863–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kuzmicheva, G.M. Nanosized phases with titanium(iv) oxides. Preparation. Characterisation. Properties. Fine Chem. Technol. 2015, 10, 5–36. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lopez-Salido, I.; Lim, D.C.; Kim, Y.D. Ag nanoparticles on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) surfaces studied using STM and XPS. Surf. Sci. 2005, 588, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lim, D.C.; Lopez-Salido, I.; Kim, T.D. Size selectivity for CO-oxidation of Ag nanoparticles on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). Surf. Sci. 2005, 598, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahmad, M.Z.; Golovko, V.B.; Adnan, R.H.; Abu Bakar, F.; Ruzicka, J.; Anderson, D.P.; Andersson, G.G.; Wlodarski, W. Hydrogen sensing using gold nanoclusters supported on tungsten trioxide thin film. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 2865–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zanella, R.; Giorgio, S.; Henry, C.R.; Louis, C. Alternative Methods for the Preparation of Gold Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zanella, R.; Delannoy, L.; Louis, C. Mechanism of deposition of gold precursors onto TiO2 during the preparation by cation adsorption and deposition-precipitation with NaOH and urea. Appl. Catal. A 2005, 291, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zanella, R.; Louis, C. Influence of the conditions of thermal treatments and of storage on the size of the gold particles in Au/TiO2 samples. Catal. Today 2005, 107–108, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chernyshov, A.A.; Veligzhanin, A.A.; Zubavichus, Y.V. Structural materials science end-station at the Kurchatov synchrotron radiation source: Recent instrumentation upgrades and experimental results. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2009, 603, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Petricek, V.; Dusek, M.; Palatinus, L. Jana2006: The CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC computing System. Institute of Physics: Praha, Czech Republic, 2006. Available online: http://jana.fzu.cz/ (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  62. Rietveld, H.M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Athena, R.B.; Hephaestus, A. Data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2005, 12, 537–541. [Google Scholar]
  64. Newville, M. IFEFFIT: Interactive XAFS analysis and IFEF fitting. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2001, 8, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ankudinov, A.L.; Ravel, B.; Rehr, J.J.; Conradson, S.D. Real-space multiple-scattering calculation and interpretation of X-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 7565–7576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: All studied samples are available from the authors.
Figure 1. CO conversion vs. temperature on Ag catalysts on TiO2 support modified with Ce (a); Fe (b) or Mg (c).
Figure 1. CO conversion vs. temperature on Ag catalysts on TiO2 support modified with Ce (a); Fe (b) or Mg (c).
Molecules 21 00532 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of Ag catalysts supported on Fe/TiO2 (a); Mg/TiO2 (c) and Ce/TiO2 (d) treated in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h. Microphotographs of catalyst Ag/Fe/TiO2 (b) and supports: Fe/TiO2 (e); Mg/TiO2 (f); Ce/TiO2 (g) and TiO2 (h).
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of Ag catalysts supported on Fe/TiO2 (a); Mg/TiO2 (c) and Ce/TiO2 (d) treated in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h. Microphotographs of catalyst Ag/Fe/TiO2 (b) and supports: Fe/TiO2 (e); Mg/TiO2 (f); Ce/TiO2 (g) and TiO2 (h).
Molecules 21 00532 g002
Figure 3. The SR-XRD patterns for the supports (a) and catalysts treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h (b).
Figure 3. The SR-XRD patterns for the supports (a) and catalysts treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h (b).
Molecules 21 00532 g003
Figure 4. Low-magnification HRTEM micrograph and corresponding elemental maps in false colors for Ag and Ce extracted from the EDS data cube for Ag/Ce/TiO2 sample treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h.
Figure 4. Low-magnification HRTEM micrograph and corresponding elemental maps in false colors for Ag and Ce extracted from the EDS data cube for Ag/Ce/TiO2 sample treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h.
Molecules 21 00532 g004
Figure 5. DRS of the supports based on TiO2, modified with Ce (a); Mg (b) or Fe (c) oxides and their corresponding catalysts before (as-prepared) and after reduction in H2 under 300 °C for 1 h.
Figure 5. DRS of the supports based on TiO2, modified with Ce (a); Mg (b) or Fe (c) oxides and their corresponding catalysts before (as-prepared) and after reduction in H2 under 300 °C for 1 h.
Molecules 21 00532 g005aMolecules 21 00532 g005b
Figure 6. XPS of lines Ag 3d5/2 for Ag catalysts supported on Mg/TiO2 (a); Fe/TiO2 (b) and Ce/TiO2 (c) after reduction in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h.
Figure 6. XPS of lines Ag 3d5/2 for Ag catalysts supported on Mg/TiO2 (a); Fe/TiO2 (b) and Ce/TiO2 (c) after reduction in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h.
Molecules 21 00532 g006
Figure 7. Lattice constants of anatase (a,b) and rutile (c,d) calculated on the basis of EXAFS data for the studied supports.
Figure 7. Lattice constants of anatase (a,b) and rutile (c,d) calculated on the basis of EXAFS data for the studied supports.
Molecules 21 00532 g007
Figure 8. XPS lines of O1s (a,b) and C1s (c,d) for supports (a,c) and Ag catalysts after reduction in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h (b,d).
Figure 8. XPS lines of O1s (a,b) and C1s (c,d) for supports (a,c) and Ag catalysts after reduction in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h (b,d).
Molecules 21 00532 g008
Figure 9. XANES (a) and EXAFS (b) spectra of catalysts treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h.
Figure 9. XANES (a) and EXAFS (b) spectra of catalysts treated in H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h.
Molecules 21 00532 g009
Table 1. Textural properties of supports and catalysts and analytical silver content of the catalysts treated in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h.
Table 1. Textural properties of supports and catalysts and analytical silver content of the catalysts treated in H2 at 300 °C for 1 h.
SamplesSBET, m2/gEDX
SupportCatalystAg Content, wt %
Ag/Ce/TiO243.446.32.1 ± 0.4
Ag/Fe/TiO245.544.01.9 ± 0.4
Ag/Mg/TiO242.643.92.0 ± 0.3
Table 2. Binding energy and relative atomic concentrations of various silver electronic states in catalysts.
Table 2. Binding energy and relative atomic concentrations of various silver electronic states in catalysts.
CatalystsBE of Different gold Electronic States (eV) and Their Relative Atomic Concretions, % (Indicated in Parenthesis)
Ag+Ag2OAg°Ag <2 nm
364.0–366.2367.4–368.1368.1–368.4>369.0
Ag/Mg/TiO2-367.5 (47%)368.3 (40%)369.9 (9%), 371.6 (4%)
Ag/Fe/TiO2366.0 (14%)368.1 (65%)369.3 (21%)
Ag/Ce/TiO2365.7 (80%)367.5 (20%)--
Table 3. Sample composition and structural parameters obtained from XAFS spectroscopies data.
Table 3. Sample composition and structural parameters obtained from XAFS spectroscopies data.
SampleXANESEXAFS
PhaseMolar Fraction, %R-Factor, %Corresponding Single-Scattering PathCoordination NumberMean Squared Displacement
Ag foilAg100-Ag-Ag120.0097
Ag2OAg2O100-Ag-O4-
Ag/Ce/TiO2Ag26.40.030Ag-Ag2.70.0115
Ag2O73.6Ag-O3.50.0183
Ag/Mg/TiO2Ag9.80.024Ag-Ag2.20.0149
Ag2O90.2Ag-O2.60.0127
Ag/Fe/TiO2Ag38.30.025Ag-Ag5.00.0131
Ag2O61.7Ag-O2.50.0170

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kotolevich, Y.; Kolobova, E.; Khramov, E.; Cabrera Ortega, J.E.; Farías, M.H.; Zubavichus, Y.; Zanella, R.; Mota-Morales, J.D.; Pestryakov, A.; Bogdanchikova, N.; et al. Identification of Subnanometric Ag Species, Their Interaction with Supports and Role in Catalytic CO Oxidation. Molecules 2016, 21, 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040532

AMA Style

Kotolevich Y, Kolobova E, Khramov E, Cabrera Ortega JE, Farías MH, Zubavichus Y, Zanella R, Mota-Morales JD, Pestryakov A, Bogdanchikova N, et al. Identification of Subnanometric Ag Species, Their Interaction with Supports and Role in Catalytic CO Oxidation. Molecules. 2016; 21(4):532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kotolevich, Yulia, Ekaterina Kolobova, Evgeniy Khramov, Jesús Efren Cabrera Ortega, Mario H. Farías, Yan Zubavichus, Rodolfo Zanella, Josué D. Mota-Morales, Alexey Pestryakov, Nina Bogdanchikova, and et al. 2016. "Identification of Subnanometric Ag Species, Their Interaction with Supports and Role in Catalytic CO Oxidation" Molecules 21, no. 4: 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040532

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop