Next Article in Journal
Structures of Two New Flavonoids and Effects of Licorice Phenolics on Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Species
Previous Article in Journal
N-Substituted 2-Isonicotinoylhydrazinecarboxamides — New Antimycobacterial Active Molecules

Molecules 2014, 19(4), 3869-3882; doi:10.3390/molecules19043869

Article
Interaction Between Different Extracts of Hypericum perforatum L. from Serbia and Pentobarbital, Diazepam and Paracetamol
Aleksandar Rašković 1, Jelena Cvejić 2, Nebojša Stilinović 1,*, Svetlana Goločorbin-Kon 2, Saša Vukmirović 1, Neda Mimica-Dukić 3 and Momir Mikov 1
1
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; E-Mails: araskovic@hotmail.com (A.R.); sasavukmirovic99@gmail.com (S.V.); momir.mikov@otago.ac.nz (M.M.)
2
Laboratory for Pharmaceutical and Natural Products Analysis, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; E-Mails: cvejich@hotmail.com (J.C.); magistrakon@orcon.net.nz (S.G.-K.)
3
Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; E-Mail: neda.mimica-dukic@dh.uns.ac.rs
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: nebojsa.stilinovic@gmail.com; Tel.: +381-64-265-3688; Fax: +381-21-661-5771.
Received: 20 December 2013; in revised form: 16 March 2014 / Accepted: 19 March 2014 /
Published: 28 March 2014

Abstract

: Herb-drug interactions are an important safety concern and this study was conducted regarding the interaction between the natural top-selling antidepressant remedy Hypericum perforatum (Hypericaceae) and conventional drugs. This study examined the influence of acute pretreatment with different extracts of Hypericum perforatum from Serbia on pentobarbital-induced sleeping time, impairment of motor coordination caused by diazepam and paracetamol pharmacokinetics in mice. Ethanolic extract, aqueous extract, infusion, tablet and capsule of Hypericum perforatum were used in this experiment. The profile of Hypericum perforatum extracts as well as paracetamol plasma concentration was determined using RP-HPLC analysis. By quantitative HPLC analysis of active principles, it has been proven that Hypericum perforatum ethanolic extract has the largest content of naphtodianthrones: hypericin (57.77 µg/mL) and pseudohypericin (155.38 µg/mL). Pretreatment with ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum potentiated the hypnotic effect of pentobarbital and impairment of motor coordination caused by diazepam to the greatest extent and also increased paracetamol plasma concentration in comparison to the control group. These results were in correlation with naphtodianthrone concentrations. The obtained results have shown a considerable influence of Hypericum perforatum on pentobarbital and diazepam pharmacodynamics and paracetamol pharmacokinetics.
Keywords:
naphtodianthrones; hypericin; pentobarbital induced sleeping time; rotarod; paracetamol plasma concentration

1. Introduction

An increasing percentage of the population is using herbal products, and herbal products’ annual retail sales reflect this growing consumer interest. The reason for this wide usage is simple—people believe that being natural, all herbs are safe [1,2]. However, contrary to this perception, herbal drugs can cause serious adverse effects, as well as herb-drug interactions. In recent years, concerns about interactions between the natural antidepressant remedy St. John’s wort (SJW, Hypericum perforatum L., Hypericaceae) and conventional drugs have been raised [1,3].

St. John’s wort is an herbaceous perennial plant that is distributed worldwide. SJW extracts have become increasingly popular because of their reported beneficial effects on the nervous system [4,5,6]. SJW extracts contain at least 10 constituents or groups of components that could contribute to its pharmacological effects. These components include naphtodianthrones (hypericin and pseudohypericin), phloroglucinols (hyperforins), flavonoids and biflavonoids [7,8,9].

A potent central nervous system effect has been demonstrated, mainly for constituents belonging to the groups of naphthodianthrones (hypericin and pseudohypericin), phloroglucinols (hyperforin) and flavonol glycosides [1,3,10,11,12,13]. It is believed that they play major roles in the antidepressant-like effects of SJW. Today, in modern herbal medicine, SJW is used for mild depression more commonly than synthetic antidepressant medication. There are many commercial products based on SJW which are used and sold as dietary supplements. If SJW is applied simultaneously with some drugs, its active principles could show pharmacologically significant interactions with these drugs through induction of cytochrome enzymes and P-glycoprotein [1,3,14,15]. Beside these well-known interactions, there are also studies showing that hypericin, as one of the main components in SJW, can inhibit uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferases (UDP-glucuronosyltransferases), which catalyse the glucuronidation of a wide variety of xeno/endobiotics [14,16,17]. SJW and its active ingredients have been shown to inhibit the reuptake of several neurotransmitters such as serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine, glutamate, and γ-aminobutyric acid which can lead to pharmacodynamic interactions with various xenobiotics [1,4,6,10].

Bearing in mind the widespread use of SJW and the consideration that herb-drug interactions are an important safety concern, the study was conducted in order to examine the interactions between different preparations of SJW from Serbia and pentobarbital, diazepam and paracetamol as examples of drugs that act on the central nervous system.

2. Results and Discussion

LC-MS analysis has been applied for a quick separation and identification of the major components of five different SJW preparations. Since there were no reference standards available for flavonoids and phloroglucinols, peak areas (divided by the injected mass of extract) were used as a measure of the absolute content of these classes. Four phloroglucinols (hyperfirin, adhyperfirin, hyperforin, adhyperforin) were identified together with several flavonoids (hyperoside, rutin, quercitrin, quercetin, biapigenin) and a small amount of caffeoylquinic acid (Table 1).

Table Table 1. Retention times and [M-H] ions of identified peaks.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Retention times and [M-H] ions of identified peaks.
PeaktR [min][M-H], m/zCompound
10.5353caffeoylquinic acid
20.7609rutin
30.77463hyperoside
40.94447quercitrin
51.72301quercetin
62.22537biapigenin
76.52467hyperfirin
86.68481adhyperfirin
97.08535hyperforin
107.18549adhyperforin

Peak identification was done by comparing the mass spectra and retention times with already published data [18,19]. The relative abundance of each group is determined by the normalization method, with the highest peak area being 100 for convenience. It is important to note that peak area, although useful for the comparison of the fractions’ purity, neither directly corresponds to the percentage composition in weight or amount, nor does it account for the total content of the compounds. Results obtained from the LC-MS analysis show that ethanolic extraction (ETE) gives the highest values for almost every compound extracted from SJW. On the contrary, water extraction yield (aqueous-AQE and infusion-INF) is much lesser than the ethanolic one for flavonoids (≈11 times) and phloroglucinols (≈72 times). There was almost no difference between ETE and AQE in the extraction of caffeoylquinic acid. This can be explained by the polarity of these compounds, with caffeoylquinic acid as highly polar, flavonoids as slightly polar and phloroglucinols as nonpolar. Highly polar molecules have similar solubility in water and ethanol, but most nonpolar molecules are water insoluble [11,12,13]. Furthermore, tablet (TBL) and capsule (CAP) has similar compositions, but still with lesser values than ETE (Table 2). According to these findings some of the further experiments were done.

The HPLC-UV-DAD method was used for the identification and quantification of naphthodianthrones (hypericin and pseudohypericin). The chromatogram obtained by HPLC analysis of the ethanolic extract is shown in Figure 1 as a representative one. Other analysed extracts had similar chromatographic profiles. From a taxonomical and pharmacological standpoint, naphthodianthrones are marker components of Hypericaceae species [8]. Peaks 1 and 2 were identified as pseudohypericin and hypericin, respectively, by comparison with reference standards and literature data,. The peaks for hypericin and pseudohypericin were detected at 590 nm.

Table Table 2. Relative abundances * of identified compounds in different Hypericum perforatum extracts obtained from the LC-MS analysis.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Relative abundances * of identified compounds in different Hypericum perforatum extracts obtained from the LC-MS analysis.
Identified compoundsExtract
ETEAQEINFTBLCAP
caffeoylquinic acid484632020
∑ phenolic acids484632020
rutin781.71.4222.422.6
hyperoside715.51.2325.425.5
quercitrin359.40.9414.715.6
quercetin100100.1394.896.9
biapigenin6.90.040.1011.911.9
∑ flavonoids29026.73.8169.3172.5
hyperfirin400.180.3620.816.6
adhyperfirin250.120.1828.326.5
hyperforin8.30.700.173.63.7
adhyperforin2.30.060.010.90.9
∑ phloroglucinols761.050.715448

* given as peak areas divided by injected mass, normalized to 100 for convenience.

Molecules 19 03869 g001 1024
Figure 1. RP-HPLC chromatogram of ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (ETE) detected at 590 nm; 1—pseudohypericin, 2—hypericin.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. RP-HPLC chromatogram of ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (ETE) detected at 590 nm; 1—pseudohypericin, 2—hypericin.
Molecules 19 03869 g001 1024

Pseudohypericin is the main naphthodianthrone in SJW and is usually present in 2–5 times higher amounts than hypericin. A positive correlation was found between hypericin and pseudohypericin by various authors [7,8,9]. Quantitative HPLC analysis revealed that pseudohypericin concentration was higher than the hypericin’s in all of the analysed samples with a strong positive correlation between the concentrations of these two compounds. As for other investigated compounds, it has been proven that ETE has the highest content of hypericin (57.77 µg/mL) and pseudohypericin (155.47 µg/mL) and that water extraction gives lower concentration of these substances (Table 3).

Pentobarbital application at a dose of 40 mg/kg i.p. resulted in hypnosis in all animals tested, regardless of the pretreatment regime. The group of animals pretreated with TBL had significantly shorter sleeping induction time comparing to control group. Other investigated preparations also exhibit the same influence on duration of sleep induction time, but the effects were not statistically significant. All preparations except AQE prolonged sleeping time, increasing it up to more than 10 min. Pretreatment with ETE exhibited statistically significant effect on the CNS, by increasing sleeping time to 120 min (Table 4).

Table Table 3. Hypericin (HYP) and pseudohypericin (PHYP) concentration in different Hypericum perforatum extracts obtained from the HPLC-DAD-UV analysis.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Hypericin (HYP) and pseudohypericin (PHYP) concentration in different Hypericum perforatum extracts obtained from the HPLC-DAD-UV analysis.
ExtractHYP [µg/mL]PHYP [µg/mL]
ETE57.77154.38
AQE3.76.4
INF4.3518.54
TBL2077.45
CAP14.2453.69
Table Table 4. The effect of Hypericum perforatum extracts and preparations on pentobarbital-induced sleeping time (mean ± SD).

Click here to display table

Table 4. The effect of Hypericum perforatum extracts and preparations on pentobarbital-induced sleeping time (mean ± SD).
Group (n = 6)Sleeping induction time [min]Sleeping time [min]
Control10 ± 4.960.8 ± 37.9
ETE8.0 ± 2.9120.7 ± 38.3 *
AQE6.6 ± 5.257.7 ± 32.2
INF7.7 ± 2.570.1 ± 48.4
TBL4.3 ± 0.8 *92.28 ± 12.9
CAP7.2 ± 2.3103.7 ± 25.5

* p < 0.05 compared with control group.

Results obtained in this study show that all examined SJW preparations administered four times in 24 h influence pentobarbital’s hypnotic effect, by shortening sleep induction and prolonging the duration of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time. Extracts used in this experiment show activity which is not in concordance with previously reported results of experiments performed with SJW extracts in the study of Jakovljevic et al., who found that all used extracts of SJW shortened sleep induction and duration of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time. The shorter duration of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time in their study can be due to longer period of extract administration (12 days) which may have caused induction of pentobarbital metabolism [20]. The effect on duration of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time was most pronounced in animals treated with ETE. By quantitative HPLC analysis of active principles in these given products it was observed that ETE contained the highest concentrations of hypericin (57.77 µg/mL) and pseudohypericin (154.38 µg/mL) in comparison to other investigated preparations. As the sleeping time induced by pentobarbital is related to its central depressant properties, it could be modified by other factors such as pharmacokinetic interference. A short-duration acting barbiturate, pentobarbital is known to be almost completely hydroxylated by the cytochrome P-450 hepatic microsomal enzymes. Pentobarbital is metabolized by 3'-hydroxylation with hepatic microsomal enzymes, probably CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 [21]. In contrast to long-term SJW administration which leads to induction of cytochrome P-450 activity, there are reports showing that short-term administration can result in inhibition of the same enzymatic system [1,3,21], so the prolongation of sleeping time after pretreatment with different SJW preparations in our experiment could be due to inhibition of the metabolic pathway of pentobarbital in the liver.

The accelerating rotarod, where a rotating rod or drum functions as a treadmill for the rodent placed atop, is widely used to assess xenobiotic effects on motor coordination in rodents [22]. The effects of SJW preparations on forced-motor activity are presented in Table 5. The motor function impairment caused by diazepam was observed in all groups, except for CAP, in the 15th min (p < 0.05) in relation to control. In the 45th and the 60th min, ETE and INF impaired motor activity of mice, but the difference was not significant in comparison to control. In this experiment, as well as in the test performed with pentobarbital, ETE had the most pronounced effect.

Table Table 5. The influence of Hypericum perforatum preparations on motor coordination impairment in mice caused by diazepam (3 mg/kg, i.p.). The mean time of equilibrium maintenance is shown in seconds (mean ± SD).

Click here to display table

Table 5. The influence of Hypericum perforatum preparations on motor coordination impairment in mice caused by diazepam (3 mg/kg, i.p.). The mean time of equilibrium maintenance is shown in seconds (mean ± SD).
Group (n = 6)Time after diazepam administration
0'15'45'60'
Control300234.17 ± 104279.17 ± 51300
ETE30030 ± 28.3 *195 ± 144197 ± 141.6
AQE30081.5 ± 91.6 *280 ± 73.5300
INF30067.83 ± 71 *219.2 ± 128.8230 ± 117.1
TBL30083 ± 45 *282.5 ± 54.2300
CAP300173.3 ± 139300300

* p < 0.05 compared with control group.

The results of this study confirmed the significant influence of SJW on the pharmacological effects of diazepam reported by Jakovljevic et al. [20]. Concerning this observation, in both studies the effect of the infusion was similar, and it lasted during all investigated times. In both studies, the effects of all analysed preparations were expressed more at the beginning of experiments (10 or 15 min after diazepam administration). The diazepam effect depends on its metabolism, where CYP-dependent hydroxylation and demethylation are the main processes. Diazepam is metabolised into the active metabolites desmethyldiazepam and oxazepam, which undergo glucuronidation to form glucoronide conjugates [23]. A possible explanation for these results could be that short-term treatment with SJW preparations inhibited CYP-dependent processes, as it was explained for pentobarbital tests [1,3]. Another explanation could be that SJW preparations inhibited glucuronidation of active diazepam metabolites and in that way prolonged and enhanced diazepam action on GABA receptors [16,17].

After calculation of the Pearson’s coefficient, there was an obvious correlation between concentrations of hypericin and pseudohypericin and the previously described parameters. The obtained results have shown a considerable influence of SJW on the hypnotic effect of pentobarbital and the impaired motor function of mice caused by diazepam. A strong positive correlation was observed for pentobarbital induced-sleeping time and both hypericin and pseudohypericin. Pretreament with SJW shortened equilibrium maintenance time, especially in the 15th minute after diazepam administration. These results show the significant influence of SJW on diazepam action which correlates with the hypericin derivative content (Table 6). Evidence available suggests that SJW and its active components have GABAergic activity [4,5]. Diana et al. proposed that hypericin may have an affinity for GABA receptors and that it could be one of the ways how it potentiates pentobarbital and diazepam effects. This is an example of pharmacodynamic interaction because pentobarbital and diazepam also act on GABA receptors [4].

Table Table 6. Prolongation of sleeping induction time (SIT), sleeping time (ST) and changes in equilibrium maintenance time at the 15th minute (t-15') in correlation with concentrations of hypericin and pseudohypericin (expressed in Pearson’s correlation coefficients).

Click here to display table

Table 6. Prolongation of sleeping induction time (SIT), sleeping time (ST) and changes in equilibrium maintenance time at the 15th minute (t-15') in correlation with concentrations of hypericin and pseudohypericin (expressed in Pearson’s correlation coefficients).
CompoundSITSTt-15'
conc. (hypericin)0.250.87 **−0.48 *
conc. (pseudohypericin)0.120.92 **−0.40 *

* correl > 0.4 ; ** correl > 0.8.

As it was concluded from the previous tests that naphthodianthrone derivative content is important for interaction with pentobarbital and diazepam we decided to investigate the interaction between paracetamol and only ethanolic extract of SJW, which has the greatest concentration of hypericin and pseudohypericin. By comparison of the PCM and PCM + HYP experimental groups it was observed that there is a significant difference in paracetamol plasma concentrations. The PCM + HYP group had a significantly higher paracetamol plasma concentration in the 5th and 30th minute and one hour after administration of paracetamol than the PCM group. Paracetamol mean concentration versus time curves of the PCM and PCM + HYP groups showed that Cmax of paracetamol is higher after SJW pretreatment (Figure 2).

Molecules 19 03869 g002 1024
Figure 2. Paracetamol plasma concentrations in mice treated with paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.p.) only (PCM) and combination of paracetamol and ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (PCM+HYP) (mean ± SD, n = 6), determined using HPLC-DAD-UV analysis.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Paracetamol plasma concentrations in mice treated with paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.p.) only (PCM) and combination of paracetamol and ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (PCM+HYP) (mean ± SD, n = 6), determined using HPLC-DAD-UV analysis.
Molecules 19 03869 g002 1024

The results of this study showed that pharmacokinetics of paracetamol could be altered by co-administration with SJW preparations rich in naphthodianthrone derivatives. Metabolism of the drug ocurrs primarily in the liver, via conjugation with glucuronic and sulphuric acids or cysteine. Glucuronidation accounts for up to two-thirds of paracetamol metabolism. A small amount of drug undergoes cytochrome P-450-mediated N-hydroxylation [24]. For the glucuronidation process the main responsible enzymes are UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. They require phosphorylation by protein kinase C for glucuronidation activity [17]. Volak and Court showed that this metabolic pathway could be compromised by protein kinase C-selective (rottlerin) and non-selective inhibitors (calphostin-C, curcumin and hypericin) [16]. In that study hypericin was presented as very potent protein kinase C inhibitor which could stop the activity of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. That is one of the possible explanations for the statistically significant higher paracetamol AUC(0-t) in the group of animals after short-term treatment with extract rich in hypericin. Although the AUC(0-t) was significantly higher, parameters for evaluation of elimination processes, i.e., Ke, T1/2 and MRT, indicated that pretreatment with SJW induced paracetamol elimination (Table 7). As it was stated before, mean paracetamol plasma concentration in the 5th, 30th and 60th minute was higher in the PCM+HYP group but after that point it rapidly fell (Figure 2). SJW has been shown to induce P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein expression on the apical surface of the cells responsible for drug elimination. In addition, there are studies indicating that paracetamol could be a substrate for P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance-associated proteins, thus induction of these efflux transporters could induce paracetamol elimination [25,26]. According to the results obtained in this pharmacokinetic study, it is obvious that short-term administration of ethanolic extract of SJW significantly altered the paracetamol metabolism and elimination process.

Table Table 7. Pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol in mice treated with paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.p.) only (PCM) and combination of paracetamol and ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (PCM+HYP) (mean ± SD, n = 6).

Click here to display table

Table 7. Pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol in mice treated with paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.p.) only (PCM) and combination of paracetamol and ethanolic extract of Hypericum perforatum (PCM+HYP) (mean ± SD, n = 6).
ParametersPCMPCM+HYP
Tmax (min)15 ± 015 ± 0
Cmax (mg/mL)0.0353 ± 0.00750.0632 ± 0.0240
AUC(0-t) (min·mg/mL)2.06 ± 0.853.64 ± 0.96 *
Ke (min−1)0.013 ± 0.0050.0388 ± 0.013 **
T1/2 (min)61.92 ± 24.9319.11 ± 5.21 *
MRT (min)72.93 ± 15.1742.09 ± 5.54 **

* p < 0.05 versus PCM group;** p < 0.01 versus PCM group.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemicals and Plant Material

Reference substances of hypericin (95%), pseudohypericin (95%) and paracetamol (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Pentobarbital sodium triethylammonium acetate and formic acid were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Diazepam was obtained from Galenika (Belgrade, Serbia). Ultrapure water was generated with TKA water purification system, including reverse osmosis, activated carbon and ion-exchange cartridges. The acetonitrile and methanol used were of HPLC grade and obtained from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Netherlands).

Dried flowering tops of Hypericum perforatum L. were obtained from the Institute for Studies on Medicinal Plants, Josif Pančić, Belgrade, Serbia in 2008. Voucher specimen (Hypericum perforatum L. 1753 No. 2-1755, Serbia, grown in culture, 20 July 2008 det.: Goran Anackov) was confirmed and deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Novi Sad (BUNS Herbarium, Novi Sad, Serbia).

Two marketed formulations were also obtained, tablet (TBL) and capsule (CAP). Tablet (TG-Farm d.o.o., Loznica, Serbia) used for these experiments contained 333 mg of SJW dry extract which is equivalent to 2000 mg of dried, powdered plant. One capsule (Quest Vitamins Ltd., Birmingham, UK) contained 100 mg of standardised SJW dry extract (0.368% hypericin).

3.2. Preparation of the Extracts

ETE: dry, powdered plant material (10 g) was macerated at room temperature for 72 h in 70% ethanol (150 mL). After filtration the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the extract was dried and used.

AQE: dry, powdered plant material (10 g) was macerated at room temperature for 72 h in water (150 mL). After filtration the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the extract was dried and used.

INF: dry, powdered plant material (3 g) was infused for 15 min in hot water (200 mL) and separated by filtration. The aqueous extract was concentrated under reduced pressure, dried and used in experiments as infusion. All dry preparations were dissolved in water to obtain the same concentration of 0.04 g of dry extract/mL.

Marketed formulations: 1 TBL and 1 CAP were dissolved in water in order to obtained solutions with concentration 0.04 g of dry extract/mL. Both preparations were used for experiments directly after filtration.

3.3. Animals and Extracts Administration

Experiments were carried out on adult sexually mature Swiss albino mice of both sexes, weighing 20–35 grams and of ages up to three months, which were bred at the Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology at the Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad, Serbia. Laboratory animals were under human care in accordance with the criteria given in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” edited by Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council, USA. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Novi Sad, (Novi Sad, Serbia) (No.: 01-153/6-2). Laboratory animals were quarantined and housed in Ehret UniProtect Air Flow Cabinet with High-Efficiency Particulate Air filter system (Emmendingen, Germany), at a controlled 21 ± 1 °C temperature and 55% ± 1.5% humidity with standard circadian rhythm (day/night). They had free access to a standard laboratory diet and water. The animals were randomly divided into test and control groups, each group consisting of six animals. Animals were treated with 0.04% water solution of each extract (400 mg/kg) orally, four times in 24 h (24, 18, 6 and 2 h before other tests). The control group received saline in the same volume.

3.4. Extracts Composition Identification by LC-MS

Chemical composition of fractions was determined by rapid resolution liquid chromatography with mass selective detection, using an Agilent Technologies 1200 Series liquid chromatograph coupled with an Agilent Technologies 6410B Series triple-quad (QQQ) mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the method described by Orcic et al. [18]. Components were separated using reversed-phase Zorbax XDB-C18 50 mm × 4.6 mm, 1.8 μm column (Agilent Technologies), held at 50 °C. The mobile phase was delivered in gradient mode (0 min 25% B, 6 min 100% B, 8 min 100% B, solvent A being 0.1% aqueous formic acid, and solvent B being acetonitrile), with flow rate of 1 mL/min. Injection volume was 1 μL. Eluted components were ionized by electrospray ion source (ESI), using N2 for nebulization (pressure of 50 psi) and drying (flow of 10 L/min, temperature of 350 °C). Capillary voltage was 4000 V and fragmentor voltage 80 V. To increase the sensitivity, lower the noise, and simplify the spectra, negative ionization was used. Generated [M-H] ions were analyzed using MS2SIM mode (MS1 experiment). For the purpose of LC-MS analysis, all dry extracts were dissolved in iso-propanol and for insoluble parts of each fraction, methanol was used.

3.5. Naphthodianthrones Identification and Quantification by HPLC-DAD-UV

Identification and quantification of naphthodianthrones was performed by HPLC analysis. The Agilent Technologies 1100 Series HPLC system consisted of a micro vacuum degasser, binary pump, Diode Array detector, autosampler, and Chem station software was used. All data processing as well as continuous on-line quantification and conditions control were performed by using Agilent Chem station software. Mobile phase component A consisted of a volume fraction of 1.0% triethylammonium acetate in water and component B consisted of acetonitrile. Gradient elution was used: From 25% B up to 100% B in 60 min. A 150 × 4.6 mm Zorbax SB-C18 (particle size 5 µm) column and a Zorbax SB-C18 (12.5 × 4.6 mm particle size 5 µm) guard column (Agilent) were used. The column was termostated at 25 °C, with a flow-rate of 1.0 mL/min. Injection volume was 10 µL and detection wavelength range was 220–750 nm. Analysis was carried out at the wavelength of 590 nm. All the analytes were quantified using peak heights.

3.6. Induced Sleeping Time Test

After pre-treatment with 0.04% water solutions of each extract animals received i.p. sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 40 mg/kg. Following pentobarbital injection, each mouse was observed for onset of sleep. A mouse reached criterion for sleep if it was placed on its back and exhibited a loss of righting reflex for 5 min. Mice that righted themselves in less than 5 min were considered to be awake. Sleeping induction time was recorded from the time of pentobarbital injection until 1 min after mice exhibited a loss of righting reflex. Sleeping time was recorded from 1 min after exhibiting a loss of righting reflex until regaining the righting reflex [27].

3.7. Rotarod (Forced Motor Activity) Test

The test for forced motor activity was conducted on animals that were able to maintain equilibrium on the fixed speed rotating rod for 5 min. Before the drug application, the mice were given one training trial during which they were allowed to remain on the rotarod up to 300 s. Two hours after last administration of water solutions of each extract, mice received i.p. diazepam at dose of 3 mg/kg. The selected animals were subjected to three consecutive trials on the rotating rod, 15, 45 and 60 min after administration of diazepam. In this test, coordination insufficiency produced by diazepam was indicated by the inability of the animals to maintain their equilibrium for at least 300 s on the rotating rod. Maintaining equilibrium was recorded for five minutes and mean time was expressed in seconds [27].

3.8. Measuring of Paracetamol Plasma Concentration and Other Pharmacokinetic Parameters

To investigate SJW extracts interaction with paracetamol we have measured paracetamol concentration in plasma of experimental animals. Two hours after the last dose of ethanolic extract of SJW, administered according to the previously described scheme, animals from experimental group paracetamol (PCM+HYP) received i.p. paracetamol at dose of 200 mg/kg (200 mg of pulverised paracetamol was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water). Control for this group (PCM) received only paracetamol at above mentioned dose. Blood samples were collected from tail vein of animals with heparinised capillary tubes (20 µL volume) on 5th, 15th, 30th, 60th, 90th and 150th minute after administration of paracetamol. Obtained plasma samples were mixed with 40 µL of acetonitrile and extracted for 20 min at 40 °C in a thermomixer. Then samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g and supernatants were separated to a new tube and kept in a freezer at −20 °C until analysis.

Obtained samples were analysed using same HPLC-DAD-UV system as for quantification of hypericin and pseudohypericin in the extracts based on the method of Al-Obaidy et al. [28]. A 150 × 4.6 mm Zorbax SB-C18 (particle size 5 µm) column and a Zorbax SB-C18 (12.5 × 4.6 mm particle size 5 µm) guard column (Agilent) were used. Paracetamol UV detection was at wavelength of 254 nm after separation on the columns described above with isocratic elution using mobile phase (10% of acetonitrile and 90% of methanol). The column was termostated at 25 °C, with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and injection volume was 10 µL.

Paracetamol plasma concentration was quantified using peak height. Pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol, maximum concentration (Cmax), time to achieve Cmax (Tmax), area under curve after extrapolation from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-t)) elimination rate constant (Ke), elimination half-life (T1/2) and mean residence time (MRT) were calculated using WinNonLin software, version 5.1, Pharsight (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.9. Statistical Analysis

The level of significance between the groups was assessed with the Student’s t-test for small independent samples using MedCalc 9.2.0.1 software. Correlation was assessed with the Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient, using same software. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that the effects of the drugs tested can be modified through interference with their pharmacokinetic properties, especially metabolic pathways. We showed that hypnotic effect of pentobarbital, motor impairment caused by diazepam and paracetamol pharmacokinetic properties could be changed with short-term SJW co-administration. In addition, we have concluded that the content of naphthodianthrone derivatives, which can differ significantly due to extraction procedures, is important for the extent of the interaction.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina project No. 114-451-2458/2011 and Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia project No. 41012.

Author Contributions

Aleksandar Rašković and Jelena Cvejić conceived and designed the experiments, Aleksandar Rašković, Jelena Cvejić and Nebojša Stilinović performed the experiments, LC-MS analysis performed Neda Mimica-Dukić, all authors analyzed the data. Saša Vukmirović, Svetlana Goločorbin-Kon and Momir Mikov contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. All authors contributed to writing of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Borrelli, F.; Izzo, A.A. Herb-drug interactions with St John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum): An update on clinical observations. AAPS J. 2009, 11, 710–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Samojlik, I.; Lakić, N.; Mimica-Dukić, N.; Đakovic-Švajcer, K.; Božin, B. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective potential of essential oils of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and caraway (Carum carvi L.) (Apiaceae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8848–8853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Madabushi, R.; Frank, B.; Drewelow, B.; Derendorf, H.; Butterweck, V. Hyperforin in St. John’s wort drug interactions. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 62, 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  4. Diana, G.; Capasso, A.; Quaranta, E.; de Feo, V. Differential effects of three species of Hypericum in an open field test. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kinrys, G.; Coleman, E.; Rothstein, E. Natural remedies for anxiety disorders: Potential use and clinical applications. Depress. Anxiety 2009, 26, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crupi, R.; Mazzon, E.; Marino, A.; la Spada, G.; Bramanti, P.; Battaglia, F.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Spina, E. Hypericum perforatum treatment: Effect on behaviour and neurogenesis in a chronic stress model in mice. BMC Complem. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ayan, A.K.; Cirak, C. Hypericin and pseudohypericin contents in some Hypericum species growing in Turkey. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bagdonaite, E.; Mártonfi, P.; Repcák, M.; Labokas, J. Variation in the contents of seudohypericin and hypericin in Hypericum perforatum from Lithuania. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tawaha, K.; Gharaibeh, M.; El-Elimat, T.; Alali, F.Q. Determination of hypericin and hyperforin content in selected Jordanian Hypericum species. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Breyer, A.; Elstner, M.; Gillessen, T.; Weiser, D.; Elstner, E. Glutamate-induced cell death in neuronal HT22 cells is attenuated by extracts from St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Phytomedicine 2007, 14, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, D.; Bai, J.; Sun, F.; Yang, D. Chemical constituents and antidepressant activity of the new species Hypericum enshiense occurring in China. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, F.; Pan, C.; Drumm, P.; Ang, C.Y.W. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry studies of St. John’s wort methanol extraction: Active constituents and their transformation. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 2005, 37, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fourneron, J.; Naït-Si, Y. Effect of eluent pH on the HPLC-UV analysis of hyperforin from St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Phytochem. Anal. 2006, 17, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mannel, M. Drug interactions with St John’s wort: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Drug Saf. 2004, 27, 773–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, J.; Duke, R.K.; Tran, V.H.; Hook, J.M.; Duke, C.C. Hyperforin and its analogues inhibit CYP3A4 enzyme activity. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2550–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Volak, L.P.; Court, M.H. Role for protein kinase C delta in the functional activity of human UGT1A6: Implications for drug–drug interactions between PKC inhibitors and UGT1A6. Xenobiotica 2010, 40, 306–318. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abe, Y.; Fujiwara, R.; Oda, S.; Yokoi, T.; Nakajima, M. Interpretation of the effects of protein kinase C inhibitors on human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A (UGT1A) proteins in cellulo. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2011, 26, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Orčić, D.Z.; Mimica-Dukić, N.M.; Francišković, M.M.; Petrović, S.S.; Jovin, E.D. Antioxidant activity relationship of phenolic compounds in Hypericum perforatum L. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tatsis, E.C.; Boeren, S.; Exarchou, V.; Vervoort, A.N.T.J.; Gerothanassis, I.P. Identification of the major constituents of Hypericum perforatum by LC/SPE/NMR and/or LC/MS. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jakovljevic, V.; Popovic, M.; Mimica-Dukic, N.; Sabo, A.; Gvozdenovic, L.J. Pharmacodynamic study of Hypericum perforatum L. Phytomedicine 2000, 7, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsuji, R.; Isobe, N.; Kurita, Y.; Hanai, K.; Yabusaki, Y.; Kawasaki, H. Species difference in the inhibition of pentobarbital metabolism by empenthrin. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1996, 2, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shiotsuki, H.; Yoshimi, K.; Shimo, Y.; Funayama, M.; Takamatsu, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Takahashi, R.; Kitazawa, S.; Hattori, N. A rotarod test for evaluation of motor skill learning. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2010, 189, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Riss, J.; Cloyd, J.; Gates, J.; Collins, S. Benzodiazepines in epilepsy: Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2008, 118, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ward, B.; Alexander-Williams, J.M. Paracetamol revisited: A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Acute Pain 1999, 2, 140–149. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aleksunes, L.M.; Campion, S.N.; Goedken, M.J.; Manautou, J.E. Acquired resistance to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity is associated with induction of multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (Mrp4) in proliferating hepatocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 104, 261–273. [Google Scholar]
  26. Manov, I.; Bashenko, Y.; Hirsh, M.; Iancu, T.C. Involvement of the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein in acetaminophen-induced toxicity in hepatoma-derived HepG2 and Hep3B cells. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2006, 99, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vogel, G.H.; Vogel, W.H. Psychotropic and neurotropic activity. In Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Pharmacological Assays, 2nd ed.; Vogel, G.H., Vogel, W.H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 398–496. [Google Scholar]
  28. Al-Obaidy, S.S.; Wan Po, A.L.; McKiernan, P.J.; Glasgow, J.F.T.; Millership, J. Assay of paracetamol and its metabolites in urine, plasma and saliva of children with chronic liver disease. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 1995, 13, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert