Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Gentiooligosaccharides of Genistein and Glycitein and Their Radical Scavenging and Anti-Allergic Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Monasnicotinates A–D, Four New Pyridine Alkaloids from the Fungal Strain Monascus pilosus BCRC 38093
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 16
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules16064728
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong from Northeastern Brazil

by
Carlos Henrique Tabosa Pereira da Silva
1,2,*,
Tadeu José da Silva Peixoto Sobrinho
2,
Valérium Thijan Nobre de Almeida e Castro
2,
Danielle da Cunha Amaral Lima
2 and
Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti de Amorim
2
1
ASCES College, Caruaruense Association of Higher Education, 55016-400, Caruaru-PE, Brazil
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, 50740-521, Recife-PE, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2011, 16(6), 4728-4739; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16064728
Submission received: 24 March 2011 / Revised: 30 April 2011 / Accepted: 24 May 2011 / Published: 7 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aims of this study were to quantify the phenolic content and evaluate the antioxidant potential of extracts from the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis and S. glandulosum. The total phenolic content (TPC) and total tannin content (TTC) were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, and the total flavonoids content (TFC) was measured via complexation with aluminum chloride. The antioxidant activity was evaluated with DPPH (2.2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and FIC (ferrous ion chelating) assays. The TPC ranged between 135.55 ± 9.85 and 459.79 ± 11.65 tannic acid equivalents (TAE) in mg/g material (mg TAE/g). The leaves of both species contained high levels of tannins and flavonoids. The crude ethanol extracts (CEE) from the bark of C. pyramidalis showed high antioxidant activity when compared to ascorbic acid and rutin, whereas the CEE from the leaves was more efficient in chelating ferrous ions. C. pyramidalis had very high phenolic content and anti-radical activity, which indicates a need for further studies aimed at the purification and identification of compounds responsible for the antioxidant activity.

1. Introduction

In Brazil, several research groups have evaluated the diversity of the medicinal species from different biomes. However, the therapeutic potential of the Caatinga biome was largely unevaluated [1,2]. It was believed that there was little to be discovered, but these initial beliefs have been disproved, and recent research has focused on the exploration and discovery of new drugs from that source [3,4].
Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. (Caesalpiniaceae) and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong (Euphorbiaceae) are species widely found in this biome, but their medical applications are still restricted to traditional communities. These species are also commonly used for other purposes, such as a wood fuel and in joinery [5]. Medicinally, C. pyramidalis is used as an expectorant, aphrodisiac, to treat bronchitis, respiratory infections, influenza, asthma, gastritis, colic, fever, heartburn, flatulence, diarrhea, collision, injury, diabetes and stomach aches [6]. The decoction of the stem bark of some species of Sapium is used internally as an abortive and purgative and externally to treat ulcers [7]. The isolation of various secondary metabolites, especially polyphenols and terpenoids. from C. pyramidalis was reported, but to the best of our knowledge, no chemical profile of the specie S. glandulosum has been published.
Based on their traditional uses in folk medicine, several thematic groups have been consolidated and form the basis of new fields, such as ethnopharmacology, that focus on gathering knowledge about the natural resources used in traditional folk medicine [8,9]. Among the various questions investigated in this field, the potential reduction of the time needed for the discovery of new drugs to treat diseases that already have alternative therapies or for those disease without known treatments is the most promising. Although this ethnopharmacological approach is potentially beneficial from the standpoint of pharmacology and toxicology, more in-depth ethical investigations are necessary [10].
The principal focus of ethnopharmacological research today is related to the discovery of new antioxidants [11,12]. Antioxidants inhibit the formation of damaging reactive oxygen species in the body [13]. Antioxidants can also inhibit the peroxidation of biological molecules by chelating transition metals that generate hydroxyl radicals through the Haber-Weiss and Fenton reactions [14]. Phenolic compounds, represented mainly by tannins and flavonoids, stand out as the major group of natural antioxidants. They act as efficient scavengers of free radicals and, due to their ability to act as hydrogen donors, they interrupt oxidative chain reactions [15,16]. The assessment of antioxidant activity has been researched, and different methodologies have been proposed [17,18]. In addition to these assessments, quantitative analysis of the substances responsible for these effects, including plant phenolic compounds, are needed [19,20,21].
Given the therapeutic potential of these plants, the objectives of this paper were to evaluate the content of phenolic compounds, including total phenolic content (TPC), total tannin content (TTC), and total flavanoid content (TFC) and the antioxidant activity (DPPH and FIC assay) of crude ethanol extracts of the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis and S. glandulosum.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Phenolic Compound Content

The levels of phenolic compounds obtained from the crude ethanol extracts (CEE) of the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis and S. glandulosum are presented in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Total phenolic content (TPC), total tannin content (TTC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong.
Table 1. Total phenolic content (TPC), total tannin content (TTC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong.
Species/Popular namePart usedTPC (mg TAE/g)TTC (mg TAE/g)TFC (mg RE/g)
Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul.CatingueiraBark160.82 ± 8.11 a61.36 ± 2.85 a114.55 ± 3.34 a
Leaves459.79 ± 11.65 b284.22 ± 4.85 b370.40 ± 12.80 b
Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong. Burra leiteiraBark135.55 ± 9.85 cND107.34 ± 3.05 a
Leaves280.68 ± 6.36 d125.97 ± 9.30 c312.56 ± 7.34 c
TPC and TTC = milligrams of tannic acid equivalents per gram of dry extract (mg TAE/g). TFC = milligrams of rutin equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg RE/g). ND: not detected; Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ statistically (n = 6; p < 0.05).
In all cases, significant differences were observed between the different parts of the same species (p < 0.05). However, the phenolic compound content was higher in the leaves. Comparing across species, C. pyramidalis showed higher levels of TPC, TTC, and TFC than S. glandulosum, with the CEE of the leaves of C. pyramidalis showing the most significant results. Unexpectedly, the bark of S. glandulosum did not contain tannins. This plant typically utilizes the ability to precipitate proteins of this class to make the plant itself unpalatable, thus reducing predation by herbivores and micro-organisms [22,23,24]. As predicted, the Pearson correlation test showed a significant relationship between TPC × TTC (r = 0.9894), although this was not statistically correlated with TFC.
One explanation for the differing levels of phenolic compounds in the bark and leaves of both species is that some metabolites may be floating in the organs of these plants [25,26]. Monteiro et al. [27] studied C. pyramidalis and found 29.60 ± 12.69 mg/g TPC and 24.72 ± 11.53 mg/g TTC in the bark, which differs significantly from the values found in this study. The authors reported that they did not determine the content in the leaves because they were unable to obtain the plant material during the collection period [27].

2.2. Antioxidant Activity

2.2.1. Radical Scavenging Activity (DPPH Assay)

Differences were observed in the radical scavenging activity both between the different species and between the different parts of the same species (Table 2). Of the samples tested, the CEE of the bark of C. pyramidalis presented the lowest concentration of extract needed to reduce free radicals by 50% (IC50 = 16.98 ± 1.34 µg/mL), and this value was statistically higher than rutin. Although the CEE of the bark of C. pyramidalis was more efficient in removing free radicals than the CEE of the leaves, the CEE of S. glandulosum leaves was more efficient than the CEE of the bark. The assessment of the percentage of antioxidant activity at 100 µg/mL showed that the CEE of the bark of C. pyramidalis was statistically higher than rutin at the same concentrations (Figure 1).
Table
Table 2. Radical scavenging activity (DPPH assay), ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity (AEAC) and chelating activity (FIC assay) of the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis Tul. and S. glandulosum (L.) Morong.
Table 2. Radical scavenging activity (DPPH assay), ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity (AEAC) and chelating activity (FIC assay) of the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis Tul. and S. glandulosum (L.) Morong.
Control/Species Name Part usedYieldAntioxidant activity (AOA)
DPPH free radical scavengingFIC assay IC50 (µg/mL)
IC50 (µg/mL)AEAC (mg AA/100 g)
Rutin--22.96 ± 1.99 b70.65 ± 6.09 a-
EDTA----15.26 ± 0.58 a
Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. CatingueiraBark11.54%16.98 ± 1.34 a95.40 ± 7.75 b527.44 ± 37.73 b
Leaves26.78%38.93 ± 0.71 c41.41 ± 0.76 c62.49 ± 10.77 c
Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong. Burra-leiteiraBark16.30%183.45 ± 7.60 d8.80 ± 0.37 d2152.98 ± 490.38 d
Leaves24.28%58.55 ± 6.35e34.11 ± 2.39 c127.10 ± 9.44 e
Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ significantly (n = 6, p <0.05).
Molecules 16 04728 g001 550
Figure 1. Radical scavenging activity of the CEE of the bark and leaves of C.pyramidalis Tul. and S. glandulosum (L.) Morong. compared with rutin. BCP = bark of C. pyramidalis; LCP = leaves of C. pyramidalis; BSG = bark of S. glandulosum; LSG = leaves of S. glandulosum.
Figure 1. Radical scavenging activity of the CEE of the bark and leaves of C.pyramidalis Tul. and S. glandulosum (L.) Morong. compared with rutin. BCP = bark of C. pyramidalis; LCP = leaves of C. pyramidalis; BSG = bark of S. glandulosum; LSG = leaves of S. glandulosum.
Molecules 16 04728 g001
According to Melo et al. [28], antioxidant activity can be classified based on the performance of the crude extract: I − good activity (IC50 < 69 µg/mL, up to three times the inhibitory concentration of the standard); II − moderate activity (69 µg/mL < IC50 < 161 µg/mL, between three and seven times the inhibitory concentration of the standard); III − low activity (IC50 > 161 µg/mL, exceeding seven times the inhibitory concentration standard). Using this classification, three of the CEEs showed good activity, and only the CEE of the bark of S. glandulosum showed low activity (Table 2).
Some studies have suggested that extracts or compounds that exhibit activity against the DPPH free radical can be considered as primary antioxidants, since these compounds act as electron donors and interrupt the chain reactions [29,30,31]. Our results showed that the CEE of the bark of C. pyramidalis has high radical scavenging capacity and can be used to inhibit the oxidation of vital substances by reactive oxygen species, possibly by acting as a primary antioxidant. In a recent study, Alviano et al. [32] used the DPPH assay and found an IC50 of 15.2 ± 1.0 µg/mL for the aqueous extract of leaves from C. pyramidalis. This result implies that this compound is more efficient than reported here; however, the extraction liquid used may have influenced the activity. Another factor influencing the results is that water restricts the extraction of various compounds of different polarity, which may contribute to the increased concentration of antioxidants in the aqueous extract.
Recent studies have shown that phenolic compounds, such as tannins and flavonoids, may be linked to the antioxidant activity of many plants [33,34]. This relationship was documented by Rumbaoa et al. [35], who found a negative correlation between the TPC and the antioxidant activity (DPPH, r = −0.826; FIC, r = −0.800) of five varieties of Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam (Convolvulacae), indicating that when the TPC is higher, the inhibitory concentration will be lower. Luo et al. [36] assessed the TPC and antioxidant activity of various fractions of the aqueous extract of Dracaena cambodiana Pierre ex. Gagnep (Asparagaceae) and observed that the ethyl acetate fraction contained higher levels of phenols and showed the highest radical scavenging ability, indicating that this species can be used as a natural antioxidant. a strong relationship between the total antioxidant capacity with TPC (R2 = 0.9220) and TFC (R2 = 0.8120) of the ethyl acetate fractions extracted from six species of Ficus (Moraceae) was also exhibited and the butanol fractions showed that good relations with TPC (R2 = 0.604) and TFC (R2 = 0.678), suggesting that these groups are responsible for the antioxidant capacity of the species [37]. However, a study by Malenčić et al. [38] on the acetone extract of twenty hybrids of Glycine max (L.) Mer. (Fabaceae) showed no correlation between antioxidant activity and TFC, nevertheless, observed for polyphenols (r = 0.6696), tannins (r = 0.7465) and proanthocyanidins (r = 0.6538). However, some of these compounds are not always related to antioxidant activity [39,40,41,42], as assessed by the Pearson correlation test between the inhibitory concentrations (IC50) and TPC (r = −0.4618), TTC (r = −0.5716) and TFC (r = −0.4307).

2.2.2. Chelating Ability (FIC Assay)

Figure 2 shows that the chelating capacity of extracts increased proportionally to the concentration. The most promising result was found for the CEE of the leaves of C. pyramidalis (Table 2). The CEE from the bark of S. glandulosum showed low chelator activity. A Pearson correlation test did not reveal any relationship between FIC and the phenolic content.
The presence of transition metals in biological systems can catalyze the Haber-Weiss and Fenton reactions, resulting in the generation of hydroxyl radicals [14]. However, these transition metals can be chelated by antioxidants, resulting in the suppression of the generation of OH- and an inhibition of the peroxidation of biological molecules. The high FIC capacity of the CEE of C. pyramidalis leaves suggests that they contain higher amounts of ligands to compete with ferrozine and prevent the generation of hydroxyl radicals. Kostyuk et al. [43] reported that flavonoids bind to metal ions and are much less prone to oxidation than the free compounds in the presence of superoxide.
Molecules 16 04728 g002 550
Figure 2. The chelating capacity of the CEE of the bark and leaves of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. e Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong. BCP = bark of C. pyramidalis; LCP = leaves of C. pyramidalis; BSG = bark of S. glandulosum; LSG = leaves of S. glandulosum.
Figure 2. The chelating capacity of the CEE of the bark and leaves of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. e Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong. BCP = bark of C. pyramidalis; LCP = leaves of C. pyramidalis; BSG = bark of S. glandulosum; LSG = leaves of S. glandulosum.
Molecules 16 04728 g002

3. Experimental

3.1. Plant Material

The stem barks are the parts typically indicated in ethnopharmacological surveys, with the leaves being collected as a possible ecological alternative to the use of non-renewable parts. Samples of the bark and leaves of C. pyramidalis and S. glandulosum were collected on May 5th and 6th of 2009 from a remnant of Caatinga within the Climatological Station of the Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco-IPA (08°14’18.2”S and 35°54’57.1”W). The region has a Bsh climate (hot semi-arid), lies at an altitude of 537 m above sea level and has an average precipitation below 700 mm/year [44]. In the same period, the voucher specimens were prepared and incorporated in the Herbarium UFP Geraldo Mariz, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, under the number 60.195 (C. pyramidalis) and 60.196 (S. glandulosum).

3.2. Reagents, Reference Standards and Equipment

Ethanol (Vetec, 99.5%) was used as the solvent to extract the samples. To determine the TPC and TTC, anhydrous sodium carbonate (Vetec, 99.5%) and Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent (Fluka, 2 N) were used. Glacial acetic acid (Merck, 100%), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (Honeywell, 99%), and pyridine (Vetec, 99%) were used to quantify the flavonoid content. For the DPPH assay, 2.2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (Aldrich, 95%) was used. Methanol (Vetec, 99.8%), ferrozine reagent (Fluka, 97%) and ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (Vetec, 99%) were used for the FIC assay. Ascorbic acid (Vetec, 99%), ethylenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA; Vetec, 99%), tannic acid (Vetec, 99%) and rutin (Acros Organics, 97%) were used as standards. Weights were measured on a Shimadzu analytical balance (AX200), and absorbance readings were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-Vis (UV mini-1240) spectrophotometer.

3.3. Preparation of Extracts

The samples were dried in an oven (Nova Técnica NT-503) for three days at 45 ± 5 °C, powdered in a Willy vertical mill grinder (Adamo 340) and standardized on sieves, resulting in a 20-mesh particle size (1.2 mm). The samples were extracted by maceration for 72 h with 70% ethanol (500 mg/mL) and then filtered through 9 mm filter paper. The extracts were subjected to slow evaporation (Fisatom 801) under reduced pressure at a temperature of 40 ± 5 °C. Yields varied between 11.54% and 26.78% (Table 2).

3.4. Determination of the Phenolic Content

3.4.1. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Tannin Content (TTC)

We used the Folin-Ciocalteu method to determine the TPC. To determinate the residual phenolic content, we used the casein precipitation method followed by the Folin-Ciocalteu method, where the TTC was the difference between the total and residual phenolic content [45,46]. To quantify the TPC, diluted extract in methanol (2 mL, 0.5 mg/mL) was mixed with an aqueous solution of Folin-Ciocalteu (5 mL, 10%, v/v), Na2CO3 (10 mL, 75 mg/L) and distilled water (84 mL). The solution was allowed to stand in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm using distilled water to reset the equipment. To quantify the residual phenolic content, the extract (15 mL) was agitated for 3 h with casein (1 g) and then filtered and diluted to 25 mL with distilled water. The residual phenolic content was determined from 5 mL of the filtrate using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. All procedures were performed with six replicates. The correlation equation constructed with tannic acid (0.1 to 6 µg/mL) was y = 0.0616x + 0.0051 (R2 = 0.9986). The TPC and TTC were expressed as milligrams of tannic acid equivalents per gram of dry extract (mg TAE/g).

3.4.2. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

The content of flavonoids in the extracts was determined using the method described by Peixoto Sobrinho et al. [47]. Aliquots of extract diluted in methanol (1 mL, 0.5 mg/mL) were mixed with glacial acetic acid (0.6 mL), a methanol solution of pyridine (10 mL, 20%, v/v), a methanol solution of aluminum chloride (2.5 mL, 50 mg/L) and distilled water (10.9 mL). The solution was allowed to stand in the dark for 30 min. The solution absorbance was measured at 420 nm using distilled water to reset the equipment. All procedures were performed with six replicates. The correlation equation constructed with rutin (2 to 50 µg/mL) was y = 0.0268x + 0.0101 (R² = 0.9996). The TFC was expressed as milligrams of rutin equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg RE/g).

3.5. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

3.5.1. Radical Scavenging Activity (DPPH Assay)

The DPPH assay was performed in triplicate based on the method described by Sousa et al. [48]. Different concentrations of each CEE or standard (25-250 µg/mL) in the amount of 0.5 mL were added to the DPPH methanolic solution (3 mL, 40 µg/mL w/v). The solution was allowed to stand for 30 min in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 517 nm. Analyses were performed using methanol to reset the spectrophotometer. Measurements were compared with a negative control consisting of DPPH methanolic solution (40 µg/mL w/v) and were used as blank concentrations for each CEE or standard (0.5 mL in 3 mL of methanol). The DPPH assay results were calculated from a calibration curve to obtain the percentage of antioxidant activity (Equation 1) versus the concentrations of CEE or standard. The data are represented as IC50 values, the concentration of sample required to reduce the absorbance of the negative control by 50%:
%AA = 1 – (Abssample – Absblank / Absnegative control) × 100
The results are also expressed as the ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity (AEAC) as calculated by Equation 2. The IC50 of ascorbic acid was 16.12 ± 0.01 µg/mL:
AEAC (mg AA / 100 g) = (IC50 ascorbic acid / IC50 sample) × 100

3.5.2. Chelating Assay (FIC)

The FIC assay was performed in triplicate as described by Chew et al. [16]. Different 1 mL dilutions of each CEE (1-7 mg/mL) or EDTA (10-100 µg/mL) were mixed with FeSO4 (1 mL, 0.1 mM, w/v), followed by ferrozine (1 mL, 0.25 mM, w/v). The solution was allowed to stand for 10 minutes in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 562 nm. Analyses were performed using methanol to reset the spectrophotometer. Measurements were compared with a negative control consisting of methanol (1 mL, 75%, v/v), FeSO4 (1 mL) and ferrozine (1 mL). The blank samples consisted of 1 mL of the dilutions of the samples with FeSO4 solution (2 mL). The capacity of the sample to chelate ferrous ions was calculated from a calibration curve to obtain the percentage of chelating activity (Equation 3) versus concentrations of CEE or standard, and the data are expressed as IC50:
%QA = 1 – (ABSsample – ABSblank / ABSnegative control) × 100

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm the normality of the data, and parametric tests were used for analysis of variance and correlation. We analyzed the variance using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The Pearson correlation test was used to compare the TPC, TTC, and TFC and the IC50 of the samples. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. BioEstat 5.0 was used to perform statistical analysis and GraphPad Prism 5 was used for regression analysis and to generate graphs.

4. Conclusions

Aligning traditional knowledge with scientific assessment through laboratory tests, C. pyramidalis and S. glandulosum represent good candidates for the crossover from folk medicine to modern therapeutics based on their phenolic content and antioxidant activity. In this sense, extract from the leaves of C. pyramidalis could be a viable alternative for obtaining compounds with great commercial potential, given its high antioxidant potential and renewability. This compound could provide new chelating agents for the chemical, food and pharmaceutical industries.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to FACEPE and MEC/SESU for the scholarships awarded to T.J.S. Peixoto Sobrinho and V.T.N.A. Castro and to CNPq for financial support to E.L.C. Amorim via the “Edital Universal”.

References

  1. Bispo, P.C.; Valeriano, M.M.; Kuplich, T.M. Relação da vegetação de caatinga com a condição geomorfométrica local. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2010, 14, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carvalho, V.C.; Freitas, M.W.D. Abordagem integrada para mapeamento da dinâmica da cobertura da terra em três áreas piloto do bioma Caatinga. Anais do XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto 2005, 1459–1468. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ustulin, M.; Figueiredo, B.B.; Tremea, C.; Pott, A.; Pott, V.J.; Bueno, N.R.; Castilho, R.O. Plantas medicinais comercializadas no mercado municipal de Campo Grande-MS. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2009, 19, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jesus, N.Z.T.; Lima, J.C.S.; Silva, R.M.; Espinosa, M.M.; Martins, D.T.O. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas popularmente utilizadas como antiúlceras e antiinflamatórias pela comunidade de Pirizal, Nossa Senhora do Livramento-MT, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2009, 19, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramos, M.A.; Medeiros, P.M.; Almeida, A.L.S.; Feliciano, A.L.P.; Albuquerque, U.P. Use and knowledge of fuel wood in an area of Caatinga vegetation in NE Brazil. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Albuquerque, U.P.; Medeiros, P.M.; Almeida, A.L.S.; Monteiro, J.M.; Lins Neto, E.M.F.; Melo, J.G.; Santos, J.P. Medicinal plants of the Caatinga (semi-arid) vegetation of NE Brazil: A quantitative approach. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 325–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agra, M.F.; Silva, K.N.; Basílio, I.J.L.D.; Freitas, P.F.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M. Survey of medicinal plants used in the region Northeast of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2008, 18, 472–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Albuquerque, U.P.; Hanazaki, N. As pesquisas etnodirigidas na descoberta de novos fármacos de interesse médico e farmacêutico: Fragilidades e pespectivas. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2006, 16, 678–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oliveira, H.B.; Kffuri, C.W.; Casali, V.W.D. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants used in Rosário da Limeira, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2010, 20, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Costa, R.S.; Brasil, T.C.; Santos, C.J.; Santos, D.B.; Barreto, M.L.; Neves, N.M.A.; Figueiredo, C.A.V. Produtos naturais utilizados para tratamento de asma em crianças residentes na cidade de Salvador-BA, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2010, 20, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muntana, N.; Prasong, S. Study on total phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities of Thai white, red and black rice bran extracts. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 13, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Montenegro, R.C.; Alves, A.P.N.N.; Madeira, S.V.F.; Pessoa, C.; Moraes, M.E.A.; Moraes, M.O. A Contribuição dos produtos naturais como fonte de novos fármacos anticâncer: estudos no laboratório nacional de oncologia experimental da Universidade Federal do Ceará. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2010, 2, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Velioglu, Y.S.; Mazza, G.; Gao, L.; Oomah, B.D. Antioxidant activities e total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, e grain product. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4113–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chew, Y.L.; Goh, J.K.; Lim, Y.Y. Assessment of in vitro antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic composition of selected medicinal herbs from Leguminosae family in Peninsular Malaysia. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Delazar, A.; Talischi, B.; Nazemiyeh, H.; Rezazadeh, H.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D. Chrozophorin: A new acylated fl avone glucoside from Chrozophora tinctoria (Euphorbiaceae). Braz. J. Pharmacogn. 2006, 16, 286–290. [Google Scholar]
  16. Higdon, J.V.; Frei, B. Tea catechins and polyphenols: Health effects, metabolism and antioxidant functions. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003, 43, 89–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Couto, M.A.L.; Canniatti-Brazaca, S.G. Quantificação de vitamina C e capacidade antioxidante de variedades cítricas. Cienc. Tecnol. Alimen. 2010, 30, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dias, A.L.S.; Souza, J.N.S.; Rogez, H. Enriquecimento de compostos fenólicos de folhas de Inga edulis por extração em fase sólida: Quantificação de seus compostos majoritários e avaliação da capacidade antioxidante. Quim. Nova. 2010, 33, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rosa, E.A.; Silva, B.C.; Silva, F.M.; Tanaka, C.M.A.; Peralta, R.M.; Oliveira, C.M.A.; Kato, L.; Ferreira, H.D.; Silva, C.C. Flavonóides e atividade antioxidante em Palicourea rigida Kunth, Rubiaceae. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2010, 20, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alcântara, J.M.; Yamaguchi, K.K.L.; Veiga Junior, V.F. Composição química de óleos essenciais de espécies de Aniba e Licaria e suas atividades antioxidante e antiagregante plaquetária. Quim. Nova. 2010, 33, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chaves, M.H.; Citó, A.M.G.L.; Lopes, J.A.D.; Costa, D.A.; Oliveira, C.A.A.; Costa, A.F.; Brito Júnior, F.E.M. Fenóis totais, atividade antioxidante e constituintes químicos de extratos de Anacardium occidentale L., Anacardiaceae. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2010, 20, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mole, S. The systematic distribution of tannins in the leaves of Angiosperms: A tool for ecological studies. Biochem. Sys. Ecol. 1993, 21, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moore, P.D. Green policies for defence spending. Nature 1998, 391, 838–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Paes, J.B.; Medeiros, V.M.; Lima, C.R. Resistência das madeiras de aroeira (Myracroduon urundeuva), cássia (Senna sianea) e ipê (Tabebuia impetiginosa) a fungos e cupins xilófagos. Floresta e Ambiente. 2002, 9, 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  25. Falleh, H.; Ksouri, R.; Chaieb, K.; Karray-Bouraoui, N.; Trabelsi, N.; Boulaaba, M.; Abdelly, C. Phenolic composition of Cynara cardunculus L. organs, and their biological activities. C. R. Biol. 2008, 331, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ksouri, R.; Megdiche, W.; Falleh, H.; Trabelsi, N.; Boulaaba, M.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C. Influence of biological, environmental and technical factors on phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Tunisian halophytes. C. R. Biol. 2008, 331, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Monteiro, J.M.; Lins Neto, E.M.F.; Amorim, E.L.C.; Strattmann, R.R.; Araujo, E.L.; Albuquerque, U.P. Teor de taninos em três espécies medicinais arbóreas simpátricas da caatinga. Rev. Árvore. 2005, 29, 999–1005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Melo, J.G.; Araújo, T.A.S.; Castro, V.T.N.A.; Cabral, D.L.V.; Rodrigues, M.D.; Nascimento, S.C.; Amorim, E.L.C.; Albuquerque, U.P. Antiproliferative activity, antioxidant capacity and tannin content in plants of semi-arid Northeastern Brazil. Molecules 2010, 15, 8534–8542. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fukumoto, L.R.; Mazza, G. Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3597–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shao, H.B.; Chu, L.Y.; Lu, Z.H.; Kang, C.M. Primary antioxidant free radical scavenging and redox signaling pathways in higher plant cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 4, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  31. Almey, A.A.A.; Khan, C.A.J.; Zahir, I.S.; Suleiman, K.M.; Aisyah, M.R.; Rahim, K.K. Total phenolic content and primary antioxidant activity of methanolic and ethanolic extracts of aromatic plants’ leaves. Int. Food Res. J. 2010, 17, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alviano, W.S.; Alviano, D.S.; Diniz, C.G.; Antoniolli, A.R.; Alviano, C.S.; Farias, L.M.; Carvalho, M.A.R.; Souza, M.G.; Bolognese, A.M. In vitro antioxidant potential of medicinal plant extracts and their activities against oral bacteria based on Brazilian folk medicine. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2008, 53, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cai, Y.; Luo, Q.; Sun, M.; Corke, H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004, 74, 2157–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gonçalves, C.; Dinis, T.; Batista, M.T. Antioxidant properties of proanthocyanidins of Uncaria tomentosa bark decoction: A mechanism for anti-inflammatory activity. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rumbaoa, R.G.O.; Cornago, D.F.; Geronimo, I.M. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Philippine sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) varieties. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, Y.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Mei, W.; Dai, H. Antioxidant phenolic compounds of Dracaena cambodiana. Molecules 2010, 15, 8904–8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saleh, E.S.; Hameed, A. Total phenolic contents and free radical scavenging activity of certain Egyptian Ficus species leaf samples. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Malenčić, D.; Maksimović, Z.; Popović, M.; Miladinović, J. Polyphenol contents and antioxidant activity of soybean seed extracts. Biores. Technol. 2008, 99, 6688–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kähkönen, M.P.; Hopia, A.I.; Vuorela, H.J.; Rauha, J.P.; Pihlaja, K.; Kujala, T.S.; Heinonen, M. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3954–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Conforti, F.A.; Sosa, S.; Marrelli, M.; Menichini, F.; Statti, G.A.; Uzunov, D.; Tubaro, A.; Menichini, F.; Loggia, R.D. In vivo anti-inflammatory and in vitro antioxidant activities of Mediterranean dietary plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  41. Anli, R.E.; Vural, N. Antioxidant phenolic substances of Turkish red wines from different wine regions. Molecules 2009, 14, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Duais, M.; Muller, L.; Bohm, V.; Jetschke, G. Antioxidant capacity and total phenolics of Cyphostemma digitatum before and after processing: Use of different assays. Eur. Food Res. Tech. 2009, 228, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kostyuk, V.A.; Potapovich, A.I.; Strigunova, E.N.; Kostyuk, T.V.; Afanas’ev, I.B. Experimental evidence that flavonoid metal complexes may act as mimics of superoxide dismutase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 428, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alcoforado-Filho, F.G.; Sampaio, E.V.S.B.; Rodal, M.J.N. Florística e fitossociologia de um remanescente de vegetação caducifólia espinhosa arbórea em Caruaru, Pernambuco. Acta Bot. Bras. 2003, 17, 289–305. [Google Scholar]
  45. Amorim, E.L.C.; Nascimento, J.E.; Monteiro, J.M.; Peixoto Sobrinho, T.J.S.; Araújo, T.A.S.; Albuquerque, U.P. A simple e accurate procedure for the determination of tannin e flavonoid levels e some applications in ethnobotany e ethnopharmacology. Funct. Ecosyst. Commun. 2008, 2, 88–94. [Google Scholar]
  46. Silva, C.H.T.P. Validação de metodologia analítica para matéria-prima e produto acabado contendo Stryphnodendron adstringes (Martius) Coville. Tesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  47. Peixoto Sobrinho, T.J.S.; Silva, C.H.T.P.; Nascimento, J.E.; Monteiro, J.M.; Albuquerque, U.P.; Amorim, E.L.C. Validação de metodologia espectrofotométrica para quantificação dos flavonóides de Bauhinia cheilantha (Bongard) Steudel. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 44, 683–689. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sousa, C.M.M.; Silva, H.R.; Vieira Júnior, G.M.; Ayres, M.C.C.; Costa, C.L.S.; Araújo, D.S.; Cavalcante, L.C.D.; Barros, E.D.S.; Araújo, P.B.M.; Brandão, M.S.; et al. Fenóis totais e atividade antioxidante de cinco plantas medicinais. Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, C.H.T.P.d.; Sobrinho, T.J.d.S.P.; Castro, V.T.N.d.A.e.; Lima, D.d.C.A.; Amorim, E.L.C.d. Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong from Northeastern Brazil. Molecules 2011, 16, 4728-4739. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16064728

AMA Style

Silva CHTPd, Sobrinho TJdSP, Castro VTNdAe, Lima DdCA, Amorim ELCd. Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong from Northeastern Brazil. Molecules. 2011; 16(6):4728-4739. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16064728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Carlos Henrique Tabosa Pereira da, Tadeu José da Silva Peixoto Sobrinho, Valérium Thijan Nobre de Almeida e Castro, Danielle da Cunha Amaral Lima, and Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti de Amorim. 2011. "Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. and Sapium glandulosum (L.) Morong from Northeastern Brazil" Molecules 16, no. 6: 4728-4739. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16064728

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop