Next Article in Journal
Radical-Scavenging Activity of Dietary Phytophenols in Combination with co-Antioxidants Using the Induction Period Method
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ginkgo Leaf Parenteral Solution on Blood and Cochlea Antioxidant and Immunity Indexes in OM Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies of Cadmium (II) Adsorption by Modified Agricultural Wastes

1
Department of Chemistry, Collage of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2011, 16(12), 10443-10456; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210443
Submission received: 26 November 2011 / Revised: 2 December 2011 / Accepted: 8 December 2011 / Published: 15 December 2011

Abstract

:
Agricultural wastes have great potential for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. The contamination of water by toxic heavy metals is a worldwide environmental problem. Unlike organic pollutants, the majority of which are susceptible to biological degradation, heavy metals do not degrade into harmless end products. Discharges containing cadmium, in particular, are strictly controlled because of the highly toxic nature of this element and its tendency to accumulate in the tissues of living organisms. This work aims to develop inexpensive, highly available, effective metal ion adsorbents from natural wastes as alternatives to existing commercial adsorbents. In particular, Tamrix articulata wastes were modified chemically by esterification with maleic acid to yield a carboxyl-rich adsorbent. The adsorption behavior of treated Tamrix articulata wastes toward cadmium ions in aqueous solutions in a batch system has been studied as a function of equilibration time, adsorbent dose, temperature and pH. Results showed that the maximum adsorption capacity was 195.5 mg/g in a pH 4 solution at 30 °C with a contact time of 120 min, an initial concentration of 400 mg/L and an adsorbent dose of 0.3 g/L. The kinetic data were analyzed using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models. It was shown that the adsorption of cadmium could be described by a pseudo-second-order equation. The experimental data were also analyzed using the Langmuir and Freundlich models of adsorption. Thermodynamic parameters such as ΔGo, ΔHo and ΔSo have been evaluated and it has been found that the sorption process was spontaneous and exothermic in nature. From all of our data, we conclude that the treated Tamrix articulata wastes investigated in this study showed good potential for cadmium removal from aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic heavy metal of significant environmental and occupational concern [1]. It is introduced into water from smelting, metal plating, cadmium nickel batteries, phosphate fertilizers, mining, pigments, stabilizers, alloy industries and sewage sludge [2]. Contamination of drinking-water may occur as a result of the presence of cadmium as an impurity in the zinc of galvanized pipes or cadmium-containing solders in fittings, water heaters, water coolers and taps. In Saudi Arabia, mean concentrations of 1–26 µg/L were found in samples of potable water, some of which were taken from private wells or cold corroded pipes [3]. Cadmium has been classified as a human carcinogen and teratogen, impacting the lungs, kidneys, liver and reproductive organs [1,4]. The harmful effects of cadmium include a number of acute and chronic disorders, such as renal damage, emphysema, hypertension and testicular atrophy [2]. Hence, it is essential to remove Cd (II) from water and wastewater prior to transport to prevent cycling into the natural environment. The most important technologies employed to remove cadmium include chemical precipitation, electroflotation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and adsorption onto activated carbon [5]. Adsorption has been developed as an efficient method for the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water and soil. A variety of adsorbents, including clays, zeolites, dried plant parts, agricultural waste biomass, biopolymers, metal oxides, microorganisms, sewage sludge, ash and activated carbon have been used for cadmium removal [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Cost is an important parameter for comparing adsorbent materials [23]. Activated carbon is considered to be a highly effective adsorbent for heavy metal removal from wastewater, but it is readily solubilized under extreme pH conditions [24] and is also very high cost [25]. Low-cost agricultural waste byproducts, such as sugarcane bagasse [26], rice husks [27], sawdust [28], coconut husks [29], oil palm shell [30], and neem bark [31], have been investigated to discover if they can eliminate heavy metals from wastewater. In this study, Tamrix articulata wastes were modified chemically by esterification with maleic acid under conditions that yielded a carboxyl-rich adsorbent. The treated adsorbent was used to remove cadmium (II) ions from water. The equilibria, kinetics and thermodynamics of the sorption process were examined.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Properties of Native and Maleic Acid-Treated Tamrix articulata Wastes

FTIR data showed bands at 3,640–3,500 cm−1, corresponding to O–H stretching vibrations, 3,000–2,800 cm−1 which correspond to C–H stretching vibrations, and 1,740–1,725 cm−1 which correspond to COO and C–O vibrations, respectively. Further bands at 1,130–1,000 cm−1 correspond to the C–O–C and O–H vibrations of polysaccharides. The same peaks were observed for native and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes. The only difference observed was an increase in the intensity of the peak at 1,735 cm−1 in the case of treated Tamrix articulata wastes, which confirms the increase in COO groups due to esterification. The elemental analysis results for native and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes revealed that native wastes are composed of 41.7% carbon, 5.3% hydrogen, and 1.8% nitrogen, whereas maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes are composed of 45.4% carbon, 5.6% hydrogen, and 1.0% nitrogen. The increase in the carbon content is due to the increase in carboxyl content. Figure 1 shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images that reveal the rough and microporous structure of the surfaces of native (Figure 1A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (Figure 1B). Esterification appears to have only resulted in changes in the chemistry of the surface and did not clearly change the porosity of the sample.
Figure 1. Shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of native waste surfaces (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Figure 1. Shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of native waste surfaces (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Molecules 16 10443 g001

2.2. Effect of Carboxyl Group Content of Treated Tamrix articulata Wastes on Cd (II) Adsorption

Table 1 shows the effect of the carboxyl group content of the esterified Tamrix articulata wastes on their adsorption capacity (metal uptake per unit weight of adsorbent) for Cd (II) ions from aqueous solutions. Evidently, increasing the extent of esterification was accompanied by an increase in the adsorption capacity of the treated Tamrix articulata wastes. A greater extent of esterification is accompanied by formation of the cellulose maleate (Equation 1), which increases the adsorption of Cd (II) ions. The data show that as the concentration of maleic acid increased from 0.0005 to 0.0043 mmol/g Tamrix articulata waste, the extent of esterification increased from 131.2 to 399 mg equiv COOH/100 g sample, with a corresponding increase in the adsorption capacity from 53.3 to 195.5 mg/g. These results indicate that the carboxyl groups introduced into the cellulose structure of Tamrix articulata wastes via esterification, play an important role in the Cd (II) ion adsorption process.
Table 1. Effect of esterification of Tamrix articulata wastes on Cd (II) ion adsorption at 30 °C.
Table 1. Effect of esterification of Tamrix articulata wastes on Cd (II) ion adsorption at 30 °C.
Maleic Acid (mmol/g waste)Esterification (Carboxylic group content) (mequiv/100 g Sample)Adsorption Capacity (qe) (mg/g)
0.0043399195.5
0.0022315137.70
0.001121088.84
0.0005131.253.3

2.3. Adsorption Studies

2.3.1. Effect of pH

As shown in Figure 2, the adsorption capacity (mg/g) of modified Tamrix articulata wastes for Cd (II) ions increased over the range 2.6–194.5 mg/g as pH values increased from 2 to 4. Indeed, the maximum adsorption, qmax, of Cd (II) ions was attained at a pH value of 4. This could be ascribed to the lower stability of chelates formed in highly acidic media. At lower pH values, the H ions present in the system compete with metal cations for the exchange sites on the adsorbent surface, causing partial release of these cations. Heavy metal cations are completely released under extremely acidic conditions [32].
Figure 2. Effect of pH on cadmium biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes at 30 °C.
Figure 2. Effect of pH on cadmium biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes at 30 °C.
Molecules 16 10443 g002

2.3.2. Kinetics of Adsorption

Information on the kinetics of solute uptake is required to select optimal operating conditions for full-scale batch processing. The graph plotted in Figure 3 shows that a contact time of 120 min was sufficient to achieve equilibrium and that the adsorption did not change significantly with further increases in the contact time. Therefore, the uptake and un-adsorbed cadmium concentrations at the end of 120 min are given as the equilibrium values.
Figure 3. Effect of contact time on cadmium (II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes at pH 4 and 30 °C.
Figure 3. Effect of contact time on cadmium (II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes at pH 4 and 30 °C.
Molecules 16 10443 g003
The kinetic values of adsorption were analyzed using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models. These models correlate solute uptake to predict the required reactor volume. These models are explained further below. The pseudo-first-order equation of Lagergren [33] is generally expressed as in Equation (1):
dqt/dt = k1(qe − qt)
where qe and qt are the sorption capacities at equilibrium and at time t, respectively, and k1 is the rate constant of pseudo-first-order sorption (min−1). After integration and applying boundary conditions, qt = 0 to qt = qt at t = 0 to t = t, the integrated form of Equation (1) becomes:
log(qe qt) = log qe k1t/2.303
The pseudo-first-order rate constant, k1, can be obtained from the slope of the graph of log(qe-q)versus time t (Figure 4A). The calculated k1 values and corresponding linear regression correlation coefficient values are shown in Table 2. The linear regression correlation coefficient value R12 was 0.945, which indicates that this model cannot be applied to predict the adsorption kinetics.
Figure 4. Pseudo-first-order (A) and pseudo-second-order (B) cadmium (II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes.
Figure 4. Pseudo-first-order (A) and pseudo-second-order (B) cadmium (II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes.
Molecules 16 10443 g004
Table 2. Kinetic constants for cadmium(II) adsorption onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes at an initial concentration of 400 mg/L at 30 °C and pH 4.
Table 2. Kinetic constants for cadmium(II) adsorption onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes at an initial concentration of 400 mg/L at 30 °C and pH 4.
The pseudo-first-orderThe pseudo-second-order
Rate Constant (K1)qe (mg/g)(R12)Rate Constant (K2)qe (mg/g)(R22)
0.046118.50.9450.000962000.999
The pseudo-second-order chemisorption kinetic rate equation is expressed in Equation (3) [34]:
dqt/dt = k2(qe − qt)2
where qe and qt are the sorption capacities at equilibrium and at time t, respectively, and k2 is the rate constant of pseudo-second-order sorption (g/(mg·min)). After integration and applying boundary conditions, qt =0 to qt = qt at t = 0 to t = t, the integrated form of Equation (3) becomes:
t/qt = 1/Kqe2 + 1/qe * t
where t is the contact time (min), and qe (mg/g) and q2 (mg/g) are the amount of solute adsorbed at equilibrium. Figure 4B shows the linear relationship of the graph plot of t/qt versus t, from which qe and k can be determined from the slope and intercept, respectively. The linear regression correlation coefficient R22 value (0.99) was higher than R21 (Table 2). These results confirm that the adsorption data were well represented by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, this means that the adsorption rate is proportional to the concentration of cadmium (II) squared. As shown in Figure 3, in the beginning, there is high concentration of cadmium ions so the adsorption rate is fast until reach 60 min then the rate become slowly until reach 120 min. Adsorption did not change significantly with further increase in the contact time after 120 min (equilibrium time).

2.3.3. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage

The amount of cadmium (II) adsorbed varied with adsorbent dosage. As shown in Figure 5, the adsorption capacity of cadmium decreased from 208.7 to 30.6 mg/g with an increase in adsorbent concentration from 0.3 to 6 g/L for an initial cadmium concentration of 400 mg/L. A similar trend was also observed for zinc removal using Azadirachta indica as the adsorbent [35].
Figure 5. Effect of adsorbent concentration on cadmium(II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes using 400 mg/L of cadmium at pH 4 and 30 °C.
Figure 5. Effect of adsorbent concentration on cadmium(II) biosorption by modified Tamrix articulata wastes using 400 mg/L of cadmium at pH 4 and 30 °C.
Molecules 16 10443 g005

2.3.4. Adsorption Isotherms

Analysis of isotherm data by fitting different models is an important step in determining a suitable model for design purposes [36].

2.3.4.1. Langmuir Isotherm

The Langmuir equation (5) [37] was applied to the equilibrium data for adsorption of Cd (II) ions onto native and modified Tamrix articulata wastes:
Ce/qe = 1/(qmax. b) + Ce/qmax
where Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate (mg/L), qe is the amount of metal ion adsorbed (mg/g), and qmax and b are Langmuir constants related to the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g) and the adsorption energy, respectively. The Langmuir equilibrium constant, KL, can be obtained from Equation (6).
KL = qmax.b.
The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm is shown in Figure 6. The correlation coefficients, R2, for the adsorption of Cd(II) ions onto native and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes are 0.966 and 0.957, respectively, indicating that the adsorption was well fit by the Langmuir isotherm.
Figure 6. Langmuir biosorption isotherms for cadmium(II) in 0.3 g/L of biosorbent for native (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Figure 6. Langmuir biosorption isotherms for cadmium(II) in 0.3 g/L of biosorbent for native (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Molecules 16 10443 g006

2.3.4.2. Freundlich Isotherm

The Freundlich equation is presented in equation (7):
Logqe = logK + 1/n logCe
where Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L) and qe is the amount of metal adsorbed (mg/g) at equilibrium. The quantities KF and n are the Freundlich constants, with KF (mg/g) indicating the adsorbent capacity and n indicating the favorable nature of the process. Plots of log qe versus log Ce should be linear, with the slope and intercept of the line obtained corresponding to 1/n and logKF, respectively (Figure 7).
The calculated values for the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm constants are given in Table 3. The adsorption of cadmium (II) onto native and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes was well correlated with the both the Langmuir and Freundlich equations for the concentration range studied. This means that the adsorption of cadmium (II) onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes is favorable. These results are confirmed by the negative ΔGº values (Table 4) which means the spontaneity of the adsorption process.
The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm (Figure 7) indicates that the surface of the maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes is uniform, and all the adsorption sites are equivalent. Also means that adsorbed cadmium molecules do not interact. At the maximum adsorption, only a monolayer is formed: molecules of adsorbate (cadmium) do not deposit on other, already adsorbed, molecules of adsorbate, only on the free surface of the adsorbent.
Figure 7. Freundlich biosorption isotherms for cadmium(II) in 0.3 g/L of biosorbent for native (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Figure 7. Freundlich biosorption isotherms for cadmium(II) in 0.3 g/L of biosorbent for native (A) and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes (B).
Molecules 16 10443 g007
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich constants for the adsorption of Cd(II) Ions onto native and maleic acid-treated wastes at pH 4 and 30 °C.
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich constants for the adsorption of Cd(II) Ions onto native and maleic acid-treated wastes at pH 4 and 30 °C.
ConstantNativeMaleic acid-treated plant
Langmuir constantsKL0.0240.8
b0.000570.0016
Q max.41.6500
R20.9570.966
Freundlich constantsKF0.1684.93
n1.441.66
R20.9910.973

2.3.5. Thermodynamic Studies

Thermodynamic parameters, such as change in Gibbs free energy (ΔGo), enthalpy (ΔHo) and entropy (ΔSo), were evaluated using Equations (8, 9):
Log Kd = ΔSo/2.303R − ΔHo/2.303RT
ΔGo = − RT lnKd
where Kd is the equilibrium partition constant calculated as the ratio between sorption capacity (qe) and equilibrium concentration (Ce), R is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol/K) and T is the temperature in Kelvin (K). From Equation (8) a plot of log Kd vs. 1/T (Figure 8) give ΔHo and ΔSo, as shown in Table 4.
The negative ΔHº value indicates the exothermic nature of the process. Moreover, the negative ΔSº value corresponds to a decrease in the degree of freedom of the adsorbed species. The negative ΔGº value confirmed the reaction feasibility and the spontaneity of the adsorption process. Further, the small absolute value for ΔGº obtained in this study indicates that physical adsorption is the predominant mechanism in the sorption process [38].
Figure 8. Thermodynamic study of adsorption of Cd(II) onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes.
Figure 8. Thermodynamic study of adsorption of Cd(II) onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes.
Molecules 16 10443 g008
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Cd(II) onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes.
Table 4. Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of Cd(II) onto maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes.
Temperature T(K)Thermodynamic parameters
ΔGo (kJ/mol)ΔSo (J/mol/K)ΔHo (kJ/mol)
303−0.265−7.9−2.6
313−0.151
323−0.082
333−0.027
It is clear from Table 5 that by comparing maximum adsorption capacities (q max) of maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes and other adsorbents from literature, maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes have large capacity in the removal of Cd(II) ions from aqueous solutions. Differences of metal uptake are due to the properties of each adsorbent.
Table 5. .Maximum adsorption capacities for cadmium adsorption to different adsorbents.
Table 5. .Maximum adsorption capacities for cadmium adsorption to different adsorbents.
Adsorbentq max (mg/g)References
Techtona grandis L.f23.20[39]
Wheat bran15.71[40]
Corncorb55.2[41]
Juniper fibre29.54[42]
Sawdust(Cedrus deodar wood)73.62[43]
Spent grain17.3[44]
Wheat bran101[45]
Algae, marine, dead Biomass80[46]
Algae, Nile water37.43[47]
Tamrix articulata195.5This study

3. Experimental

3.1. Raw Material and Chemicals

Tamrix articulate is a moderately sized tree with feathery foliage and an erect stem usually attaining a height of 40 feet to 50 feet and girth of 5 to 6 feet. It grows faster than any other species in arid tracts. It is distributed in Saudi Arabia in Taif and Riyadh and it can be collected in large amounts each year. Tamrix articulata were collected from the Saudi Arabian desert, ground, passed through 200–400 mesh sieves and then washed with hot distilled water until the final effluent was colorless. The resulting material was then dried in an electric oven for 3 h at 60 °C. Maleic acid, cadmium acetate, ethanol and EDTA were all laboratory-grade chemicals supplied by Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

3.2. Preparation and Characterization of Adsorbent

Tamrix articulata wastes were esterified according to the previously described method [48]. A total of 10 g of ground Tamrix artculata wastes was placed in a beaker, and maleic acid (0.0043, 0.0022, 0.0011, and 0.0005 mmol/g waste dissolved in the least amount of water) was added under continuous mixing with a mechanical stirrer until a homogeneous paste was obtained. The paste was then transferred to a Pyrex Petri dish and dried for 2 h at 60 °C in an air-circulated oven. The dried material was treated thermally at 140 °C for 2 h, and then cooled to room temperature and ground. Soluble by-products and unreacted acid were removed by extraction in a Soxhlet extractor for 3 h with water-ethanol (20:80) mixture. The final purified material was dried for 2 h at 60 °C. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, samples were mounted on an aluminum stub, coated with a thin layer of gold, and then examined using a JEOL microscope (JSM-6380 LA, Japan). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of samples were recorded using a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific USA). Elemental analysis of native and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes was performed using Series II CHN analyzer (Perkin Elmer, USA).

3.3. Carboxyl Content

The carboxyl content of the native and modified Tamrix articulata wastes was determined according to the method reported in [49]. Previous studies [50,51] have indicated that carboxylic acids can form anhydrides (I) when subjected to heat treatment (Scheme 1). The presence of maleic acid and cellulosic material in the Tamrix articulata wastes during the heating process would allow an anhydride (I) to react with the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose in the Tamrix articulata wastes, forming a cellulose maleate adduct (II) [26].
Scheme 1. Reaction of cellulose with maleic acid.
Scheme 1. Reaction of cellulose with maleic acid.
Molecules 16 10443 g010
As shown in Figure 9, the influence of the maleic acid concentration [mmol/g (Tamrix articulata wastes)] on the extent of esterification as expressed in mequiv COOH/100 g sample. The extent of esterification increased significantly as the maleic acid concentration was increased, within the range studied. This enhancement in the ester group content could be interpreted in terms of the greater availability of maleic acid molecules to be converted to anhydride (I).
Figure 9. Effect of maleic acid concentration on the carboxyl group content of esterified Tamrix articulata wastes.
Figure 9. Effect of maleic acid concentration on the carboxyl group content of esterified Tamrix articulata wastes.
Molecules 16 10443 g009

3.4. Adsorption Studies

Known volumes (100 mL) of each cadmium (II) ion solution [100-1,250 mg/L] were placed in 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 0.03 g of adsorbent. The contents were shaken at 150 rpm for 2 h in a thermostatic shaking water bath at 30 °C. At the end of 2 h, the metal ion solutions were separated by filtration. Blank experiments without added adsorbents were performed at the same time. The metal ion concentrations were determined by direct detection against standard EDTA solutions before and after adsorption.

4. Conclusions

The maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes investigated in this study showed good potential for the removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions. The maximum adsorption capacity (qe) occurred at pH 4 and a contact time of 2 h. The adsorption isotherms were well fit by the Langmuir and Freundlich equations. The biosorption process was best described by a pseudo-second-order equation. Thermodynamic parameters (ΔGo, ΔHo and ΔSo) showed that the adsorption process is spontaneous and exothermic in nature. Further future work will be comparative study to test the treated Tamrix articulata wastes in adsorption of other toxic metals and also in adsorption of some organic pollutants from water.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NPST program by King Saud University project number 09-ENV656-02.

References and Notes

  1. Waalkes, M.P. Cadmium carcinogenesis in review. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000, 79, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kadirvelu, K.; Namasivayam, C. Agricultural by-products as metal adsorbents: Sorption of lead (II) from aqueous solutions onto coirpith carbon. Environ. Technol. 2000, 21, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mustafa, H.T.; Hassan, M.A.H.; Abo-Melha, A.; Talaat, I.R. Cadmium and zinc concentrations in the potable water of the eastern provinces of Saudi Arabia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1988, 40, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, Y.C. Thermodynamics of removal of cadmium by adsorption on indigenous clay. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 145, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poon, C.P.C. Removal of Cd (II) from Wastewaters. In Cadmium in the Environment; Mislin, H., Raverva, O., Eds.; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 1986; pp. 6–55. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan, G.Q.; Xiao, D. Adsorption of cadmium ion from aqueous solution by ground wheat stems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1359–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarı, A.; Tuzen, M. Biosorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution using green alga (Ulva lactuca) biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anayurt, R.A.; Sari, A.; Tuzen, M. Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies on biosorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution by macrofungus (Lactarius scrobiculatus) biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 151, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarı, A.; Tuzen, M. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of biosorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution by macrofungus (Amanita rubescens) biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sarı, A.; Tuzen, M. Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution using moss (Drepanocladus revolvens) biomass: Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuzen, M.; Sari, A.; Mendil, D.; Soylak, M. Biosorptive removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution using lichen (Xanthoparmelia conspersa) biomass: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benguella, B.; Benaissa, H. Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by chitin: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Water Res. 2002, 36, 2463–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Meng, Y.T.; Zheng, Y.M.; Zhang, L.M.; He, J.Z. Biogenic Mn oxides for effective adsorption of Cd from aquatic environment. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2577–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soltani, R.D.C.; Jafari, A.J.; Khorramabadi, Gh.S. Investigation of cadmium (II) ions biosorption onto pretreated dried activated sludge. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 5, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  15. An, H.K.; Park, B.Y.; Kim, D.S. Crab shell for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution. Water Res. 2001, 35, 3551–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cortes-Martinez, R.; Martinez-Miranda, V.; Solache-Rios, M.; Garcia-Sosa, I. Evaluation of natural and surfactant-modified zeolites in the removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 2711–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Garg, U.; Kaur, M.P.; Jawa, G.K.; Sud, D.; Garg, V.K. Removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Semerjian, L. Equilibrium and kinetics of cadmium adsorption from aqueous solutions using untreated Pinus halepensis sawdust. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Z.Z.; Katsumi, T.; Imaizumi, S.; Tang, X.W.; Inui, T. Cd(II) adsorption on various adsorbents obtained from charred biomaterials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, F.Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.W. Adsorption of cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solution by a new low-cost adsorbent-Bamboo charcoal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tashauoei, H.R.; Attar, H.M.; Amin, M.M.; Kamali, M.; Nikaeen, M.; Dastjerdi, M.V. Removal of cadmium and humic acid from aqueous solutions using surface modi.ed nanozeoliteA. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 7, 497–508. [Google Scholar]
  22. Visa, M.; Bogatu, C.; Duta, A. Simultaneous adsorption of dyes and heavy metals from multicomponent solutions using fly ash. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 5486–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bailey, S.E.; Olin, T.J.; Bricka, R.M.; Adrian, D. A review of potentially low cost sorbents for heavy metal. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2469–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, C.P.; Blankenship, B.W. The removal of mercury(II) from dilute aqueous Solution by activated carbon. Water Res. 1989, 18, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ho, Y.S.; Chiang, T.H.; Hsueh, Y.M. Removal of basic dye from aqueous solution using tree fern as a biosorbent. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chand, S.; Aggarwal, V.K.; Kumar, P. Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from the Wastewater by Adsorption. Indian J. Environ. Health 1994, 36, 151–158. [Google Scholar]
  27. Srinivasan, K.; Balasubramaniam, N.; Ramakrishna, T.V. Studies on Chromium Removal by Rice Husk Carbon. Indian J. Environ. Health 1998, 30, 376–387. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ajmal, M.; Rao, R.A.K.; Siddiqui, B.A. Studies on Removal and Recovery of Cr (VI) from Electroplating Wastes. Water Res. 1996, 30, 1478–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tan, W.T.; Ooi, S.T.; Lee, C.K. Removal of Chromium (VI) from Solution by Coconut Husk and palm Pressed Fibre. Environ. Technol. 1993, 14, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, N.A.; Shaaban, M.G.; Hassan, M.H.A. Removal of heavy metal using an inexpensive adsorbent. In Proceedings of UM Research SeminarUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 11th–12th March 2003; University of Malaya: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2003; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ayub, S.; Ali, S.I.; Khan, N.A. Efficiency evaluation of neem (Azadirachta indica) bark in treatment of industrial wastewater. Environ. Pollut. Control J. 2001, 4, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gong, R.; Ding, Y.D.; Liu, H.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z. Lead biosorption by intact and pretreated Spirulina maxima biomass. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lagergren, S. About The Theory of So-Called Adsorption of Soluble Substances. Kungliga Svenska Ventenskapsakademiens Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, E. The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by Sphagnum moss pea. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1998, 76, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhattacharyya, K.G.; Sharma, A. Adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf powder. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, B113, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Geundi, M.S. Homogeneous surface diffusion model for the adsorption of basic dyestuffs onto natural clay in batch absorbers. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 1991, 8, 217–225. [Google Scholar]
  37. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Horsfall, M.; Spiff, A.I.; Abia, A.A. Studies on the influence of mercaptoacetic acid (MAA) modification of cassava (Manihot sculenta cranz) waste Biomass on the adsorption of Cu2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solution. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004, 25, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rao, K.S.; Anand, S.; Venkateswarlu, P. Adsorption of cadmium (II) ions from aqueous solutions by Tectona Grandis L.F. (Teak leaves powder). BioResources 2010, 5, 438–454. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nouri, L.; Ghodbane, I.; Hamdaoui, O.; Chiha, M. Batch sorption dynamics and equilibrium for removal of cadmium ions from aqueous phase using wheat bran. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramos, R.L; Jacome, L.A.B.; Rodriguez, I.A. Adsorption of cadmium(II) from aqueous solution on natural and oxidized corncob. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2005, 4, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  42. Min, S.H.; Han, J.S.; Shin, E.W.; Park, J.K. Improvement of cadmium ion removal by base treatment of juniper fiber. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Memon, S.Q.; Memon, N.; Shaw, S.W.; Khuhawar, M.Y.; Bhanger, M.I. Saw dust-A green economical sorbent for the removal of cadmium(II) ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, B139, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  44. Low, K.S.; Lee, C.K.; Liew, S.C. Adsorption of cadmium and lead from aqueous solutions by spent grain. Process Biochem. 2000, 36, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ozer, A.; Pirincci, H.B. The adsorption of Cd(II) ions on sulphuric acid-treated wheat bran. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B137, 849–855. [Google Scholar]
  46. Herrero, R.; Cordero, B.; Lodeiro, P.; Rey-Castro, C.; Sastre de Vicente, M.E. Interactions of cadmium(II) and protons with dead biomass of marine algae Fucus sp. Mar. Chem. 2006, 99, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sherif, Y.E.; Ashmawy, A.; Badr, S. Biosorption of cadmium and nickel by Nilewater algae. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2008, 4, 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wing, R.E.; Peoria, I.L. Corn fiber citrate: Preparation and ion-exchange properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 1996, 5, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Daul, G.C.; Reinhardt, R.M.; Reid, J.D. The carboxymethylation of cotton. Text. Res. J. 1953, 23, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hashem, A.; Abdel-Halim, E.S.; El-Tahlawy, Kh.F.; Hebeish, A. Enhancement of the Adsorption of Co(II) and Ni(II) Ions onto Peanut Hulls through Esterification Using Citric Acid. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2005, 23, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Andrews, B.A.K.; Blanchard, E.J.; Einhardt, R.M. Fabric Whiteness Press Finishing with Citric Acid. Text. Chem. Color. 1993, 25, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds (Tamrix articulata wastes and maleic acid-treated Tamrix articulata wastes) are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Othman, Z.A.; Hashem, A.; Habila, M.A. Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies of Cadmium (II) Adsorption by Modified Agricultural Wastes. Molecules 2011, 16, 10443-10456. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210443

AMA Style

Al Othman ZA, Hashem A, Habila MA. Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies of Cadmium (II) Adsorption by Modified Agricultural Wastes. Molecules. 2011; 16(12):10443-10456. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210443

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Othman, Zeid A., Ali Hashem, and Mohamed A. Habila. 2011. "Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Studies of Cadmium (II) Adsorption by Modified Agricultural Wastes" Molecules 16, no. 12: 10443-10456. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210443

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop