Design, Synthesis and Antifungal/Insecticidal Evaluation of Novel Cinnamide Derivatives
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis
Compound | 11b |
---|---|
Empirical formula | C24H23ON2C |
Formula weight | 391.2 |
Crystal system/space groupOrthorhombic | Triclinic, P-1 |
a / Å | 8.6568(17) |
b / Å | 13.927(3) |
c / Å | 18.507(4) |
α / ° | 90° |
β / ° | 90° |
γ / ° | 90° |
V / Å3 | 2056.1(7) |
Z | 4 |
D calc (g/cm3) | 1.263 |
μ (mm−1) | 0.202 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.50 × 0.36 × 0.36 |
Color/shape | Colorless/ rectangle |
Temp (K) | 173(2)K |
Theta range for collection | 2.39 < θ < 25.00° |
Reflections collected | 20946 |
Independent reflections | 7232 |
Data/restraints/parameters | 7232 / 0 / 505 |
Goodness of fit on F2 | 1.062 |
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] | R1 = 0.0481, wR2 = 0.1187 |
R indices (all data) | R1 = 0.0514, wR2 = 0.1213 |
Largest difference peak/hole | 0.686 and −0.312 e.A−3 |
2.2. Biological Activity
Compd. | R. solani | P. parasitica | B. cinerea | S. sclerotiorum | V. mali | P. asparagi | C. lindemuthianum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11a | 93.88 | 24.41 | 44 | 37 | 48 | 59.70 | 59.7 |
11b | 22.45 | 26.77 | 50 | 44 | 20 | 34.33 | 34.33 |
11c | 76.77 | 1.61 | 67 | 72 | 52 | 35.82 | 55.97 |
11d | 4.52 | 11.29 | 43 | 24 | 31 | 22.39 | 47.01 |
11e | 13.55 | −2.42 | 55 | 42 | −6.3 | 31.34 | 43.28 |
11f | 82.58 | 0 | 59 | 42 | 42 | 39.55 | 55.22 |
11g | 23.81 | 14.17 | 33 | 28 | 36 | 23.88 | 23.88 |
11h | 35.48 | 22.58 | 40 | 68 | 29 | 29.10 | 42.54 |
11i | 14.84 | −8.06 | 48 | 53 | 18 | 23.13 | 22.39 |
11j | 72.9 | −18.5 | 33 | 29 | 29 | 55.22 | 16.42 |
11k | 67.74 | 28.23 | 37 | 17 | 24 | 32.09 | 24.63 |
11l | 90.97 | −18.5 | 54 | 44 | −6.3 | 17.16 | 35.82 |
11m | 13.55 | −25 | 38 | 27 | 26 | 42.54 | 21.64 |
11n | 9.03 | −13.7 | 50 | 29 | −7.8 | 32.84 | 39.55 |
11o | 15.48 | −17.7 | 43 | 16 | 36 | 44.03 | 32.84 |
11p | 9.68 | 5.65 | 48 | 45 | 30 | 28.36 | 37.31 |
11q | 3.87 | −9.68 | 15 | 2.7 | 18 | 23.88 | 17.16 |
11r | 5.81 | −14.5 | 52 | 11 | 68 | 16.42 | 28.36 |
11s | 10.32 | −17.7 | 47 | 5.3 | −2.3 | 28.36 | 28.36 |
11t | 16.13 | 14.52 | 64 | 27 | −2.3 | 55.97 | 38.81 |
pyrimorph | 97.20 | - | - | 79 | - | 66.50 | - |
carbendazim | 100 | 14.52 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 82.09 | |
chlorothalonil | 75.48 | 63.71 | 95 | 70 | 88 | 82.09 | |
azoxystrobin | 89.03 | 37.9 | 80 | 100 | 92 |
Compd. | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortality (%) | Corrected mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | Corrected mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | Corrected mortality (%) | |
11a | 21.67 ± 1.67 | 15.80 ± 1.79 | 5.00 ± 1.15 | 28.13 ± 1.28 | 45.00 ± 1.89 | 35.35 ± 0.39 |
11b | 23.67 ± 0.88 | 17.95 ± 0.95 | 33.33 ± 1.67 | 26.29 ± 1.84 | 72.67 ± 1.20 | 67.87 ± 1.41 |
11c | 20.67 ± 0.67 | 14.73 ± 0.72 | 29.00 ± 1.08 | 21.49 ± 1.30 | 53.33 ± 1.40 | 45.15 ± 1.82 |
11d | 28.33 ± 1.20 | 22.97 ± 1.29 | 31.67 ± 1.67 | 24.44 ± 1.84 | 38.67 ± 1.86 | 27.91±1.18 |
11e | 19.67 ± 0.33 | 13.65±0.36 | 44.67 ± 1.20 | 38.82 ± 1.33 | 50.67 ± 2.96 | 42.01 ± 1.48 |
11f | 19.33 ± 0.67 | 13.29 ± 0.72 | 44.33 ± 0.88 | 38.45 ± 0.97 | 52.33 ± 1.33 | 43.97 ± 1.71 |
11g | 15.00 ± 0.00 | 8.63 ± 0.00i | 25.67 ± 1.33 | 17.81 ± 1.58 | 33.33 ± 0.88 | 21.64 ± 1.03 |
11h | 24.67 ± 1.67 | 19.02 ± 1.87 | 40.33 ± 0.88 | 34.02 ± 0.98 | 47.00 ± 1.45 | 38.09 ± 1.71 |
11i | 11.00 ± 0.57 | 4.33 ± 0.62 | 44.67 ± 0.67 | 38.82 ± 0.74 | 53.33 ± 1.67 | 45.15 ± 1.96 |
11j | 14.00 ± 1.53 | 7.56 ± 1.64 | 21.00 ± 0.58 | 12.65 ± 0.64 | 27.00 ± 1.15 | 14.20 ± 1.36 |
11k | 20.67 ± 0.67 | 14.73 ± 0.72 | 40.00 ± 1.15 | 33.60 ± 1.28 | 52.33 ± 1.45 | 43.97 ± 1.71 |
11l | 10.67 ± 0.33 | 3.97 ± 0.36 | 23.00 ± 1.00 | 14.86 ± 1.11 | 35.33 ± 1.60 | 23.99 ± 1.06 |
11m | 18.33 ± 1.02 | 12.22 ± 1.18 | 50.00 ± 1.15 | 44.71 ± 1.28 | 61.00 ± 1.08 | 54.16 ± 1.44 |
11n | 26.67 ± 0.67 | 21.17 ± 0.95 | 34.67 ± 1.45 | 27.76 ± 1.61 | 41.67 ± 1.67 | 31.44 ± 1.96 |
11o | 15.67 ± 0.67 | 9.34 ± 0.92 | 23.00 ± 1.00 | 14.86 ± 1.11 | 30.33 ± 0.33 | 18.11 ± 0.39 |
11p | 14.00 ± 1.00 | 7.56 ± 1.07 | 17.00 ± 1.53 | 8.23 ± 1.69 | 22.33 ± 0.88 | 8.71 ± 1.04 |
11q | 33.67 ± 0.88 | 28.70 ± 0.95 | 52.67 ± 1.20 | 47.67 ± 1.32 | 65.67 ± 1.67 | 49.07 ± 1.96 |
11r | 1.67 ± 0.88 | 13.65 ± 0.95 | 24.33 ± 1.20 | 16.33 ± 1.33 | 31.33 ± 0.67 | 19.29 ± 0.79 |
11s | 14.67 ± 1.45 | 8.27 ± 1.56 | 24.67 ± 1.45 | 16.70 ± 1.61 | 31.33 ± 1.33 | 19.29 ± 0.79 |
11t | 18.00 ± 1.15 | 11.86 ± 1.24 | 30.00 ± 1.52 | 22.60 ± 1.78 | 42.33 ± 1.45 | 32.22 ± 1.71 |
6 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 |
CK | 6.97 ± 1.06 2 | 9.50 ± 1.05 2 | 13.02 ± 0.88 2 |
Time | Compd. | Regression equation | Correlation coefficient | LD50 (mg/L) | 95% Confidence limit (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 h | 11b | Y = 0.41 + 1.85x | 0.99 | 300.56 | 241.33–373.00 |
48 h | Y = 0.14 + 2.17x | 0.99 | 173.77 | 165.11–182.88 | |
72 h | Y = 0.59 + 2.14x | 0.99 | 113.79 | 95.27–135.90 | |
24 h | 11c | y = 0.15 + 1.84x | 0.97 | 429.66 | 285.32–646.99 |
48 h | y = 0.02 + 2.00x | 0.98 | 314.58 | 231.32–429.57 | |
72 h | y = 0.37 + 1.92x | 0.95 | 252.36 | 170.43–373.67 | |
24 h | 11f | y = 0.74 + 1.71x | 0.98 | 305.34 | 232.32–401.02 |
48 h | y = 1.89 + 1.38x | 0.98 | 178.50 | 139.51–228.41 | |
72 h | y = 2.28 + 1.30x | 0.94 | 126.18 | 80.47–180.78 | |
24 h | 6 | y = 0.26 + 5.70x | 0.96 | 8.38 | 7.77–9.03 |
48 h | y = 0.44 + 5.67x | 0.95 | 6.36 | 5.90–6.84 | |
72 h | y = 0.62 + 6.00x | 0.96 | 5.38 | 4.96–5.78 | |
24 h | Avermectins | y = 2.58 + 1.75x | 0.94 | 18.88 | 10.56–33.75 |
48 h | y = 3.35 + 1.73x | 0.98 | 8.98 | 8.30–9.73 | |
72 h | y = 3.27 + 2.00x | 0.99 | 7.23 | 6.43–8.12 |
3. Experimental
3.1. General: Instruments and Methods
3.2. General Synthetic Procedures for the Preparation of Compounds 10a–10j
3.3. General Synthetic Procedures for Compounds 11a–11t
3.4. Bioassays
3.4.1. Fungicidal Activity Test
3.4.2. Nematicidal Activity
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References and Notes
- Kamal, A.; Balakishan, G.; Ramakrishna, G.; Basha, S.T.; Sreekanth, K.; Balakrishna, M.; Rajender; Dastagiri, D.; Kalivendi, S.V. Synthesis and biological evaluation of cinnamido linked pyrrolo [2,1-c] [1,4]benzodiazepines as antimitotic agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3870–3884. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, X.H.; Wu, Y.H. Synthesis and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of cinnamic amides. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 27, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
- Kristan, K.; Starcević, S.; Brunskole, M.; Rižner, T.L.; Gobec, S. Cinnamates and cinnamamides inhibit fungal 17 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2006, 248, 239–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, B.; Samanta, S.; Roy, K.; Jha, T. QSAR study on some p-arylthio cinnamides as antagonists of biochemical ICAM-1/LFA-1 interaction and ICAM-1/JY-8 cell adhesion in relation to anti-inflammatory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 1615–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.B.; Feng, H.J.; Chen, G.R.; Li, Y.C. Syntheses and biological activities of α-substituted N-(phenylethyl)cinnamides. Chin. J. Med. chem. 2003, 13, 329–334, 355.. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, F.; Zhang, S.H.; Shao, R.G.; Zhen, Y.S. Anticancer activity of sodium caffeate and its mechanism. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2005, 26, 1248–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, Y.S.; Jiang, X.F. Cinnamamide, an antitumor agent with low cytotoxicity acting on matrix metalloproteinase. Anti-Cancer Drug. 2000, 11, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, E.L.; Watkins, R.W.; Cowan, D.P.; Bishop, J.D.; Gurney, J.E. Cinnamamide, an avian repellent, reduces woodpigeon damage to oilseed rape. Pestic. Sci. 52, 159–164.
- Gill, E.L.; Feare, C.J.; Cowan, D.P.; Fox, S.M.; Bishop, J.D.; Langton, S.D.; Watkins, R.W.; Gurney, J.E. Cinnamamide modifies foraging behaviors of free-living birds. J. Wildlife Manage. 62, 872–884.
- Kuhn, P.J.; Pitt, D.; Lee, S.A.; Wakley, G.; Shepard, A.N. Effects of dimethomorph on the morphology and ultra structure of phytophora. Mycol. Res. 1991, 95, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.C.; Liu, C.L. Novel fungicide flumorph(SYP-L190) with high activity. Pesticides 2002, 41, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, Z.H.; Mu, C.W.; Mao, S.F.; Dong, Y.H.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.S. Preparation of 4-[3-(pyridin-4-yl)-3-phenylacryl]morpholine derivatives as fungicides. CN Patent 1566095, 19 January 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Mu, C.W.; Yuan, H.Z.; Li, N.; Fu, B.; Xiao, Y.M.; Ma, Y.Q.; Qi, S.H.; Qin, Z.H. Synthesis and fungicidal activities of a novel series of 4-[3-(pyrid-4-y1)-3-substituted phenyl acryloy1] morpholine. Chem. J. Chinese U. 2007, 28, l902–l906. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.Y.; Yuan, H.Z.; Qin, Z.H.; Chen, X.X.; Qi, S.H. Preliminary studies on the mode of action of pyrimorph against phytophthora infestans. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2007, 9, 376–382. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, X.J.; Qin, W.C.; Sun, L.P.; Qi, S.H.; Yang, D.B.; Qin, Z.H.; Yuan, H.Z. Study of inhibitory effects and action mechanism of the novel fungicide Pyrimorph against Phytophthora capsici. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 2720–2725. [Google Scholar]
- Lamberth, C.; Cederbaum, F.; Jeanguenat, A.; Kempf, H.; Zeller, M.; Zeun, R. Synthesis and fungicidal activity of N-2-(3-methoxy-4-propargyloxy) phenethyl amides. Part II: Anti-oomycetic mandelamides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, N.; Wang, Z.J.; Wang, L.Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, W.L.; Wang, H.X.; Li, Z.M.; Zhao, W.G. Synthesis and biological evaluation of isosteric analogs of mandipropamid for the control of Oomycete pathogens. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2011, 78, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.M.; Wan, S.Q. The Content of (E)-N-2-Phenylethylcinnamamide in different organ of clausena lansium and the activity to colletotrchum musae. Pesticides 2008, 47, 15–16. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.X.; Gong, Z.Y.; Wan, S.Q. Inhibitory effects of clausenamide alkaloid on seven fruit pathogenic fungi. Plant Protection 2009, 35, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
- Stefanuti, I.; Smith, S.A.; Taylor, R.J.K. Unsaturated enamides via organometallic addition to isocyanates: The synthesis of Lansamide-I, Lansiumamides A–C and SB-204900. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3735–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, N.C. Pesticide Bioassay Method; Beijing Agriculture University Press: Beijing, China, 1998; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
- Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 11 are available from the authors.
© 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
Xiao, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, B.; Yuan, H.; Wan, S.; Xu, Y.; Qin, Z. Design, Synthesis and Antifungal/Insecticidal Evaluation of Novel Cinnamide Derivatives. Molecules 2011, 16, 8945-8957. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16118945
Xiao Y, Yang X, Li B, Yuan H, Wan S, Xu Y, Qin Z. Design, Synthesis and Antifungal/Insecticidal Evaluation of Novel Cinnamide Derivatives. Molecules. 2011; 16(11):8945-8957. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16118945
Chicago/Turabian StyleXiao, Yumei, Xiaoli Yang, Bo Li, Huizhu Yuan, Shuqing Wan, Yanjun Xu, and Zhaohai Qin. 2011. "Design, Synthesis and Antifungal/Insecticidal Evaluation of Novel Cinnamide Derivatives" Molecules 16, no. 11: 8945-8957. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16118945