Next Article in Journal
Optimal Design of ORC Systems with a Low-Temperature Heat Source
Next Article in Special Issue
Bumps on the Road to Here (from Eternity)
Previous Article in Journal
Filter-Type Variable Selection Based on Information Measures for Regression Tasks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classical and Quantum Models in Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics: Moment Methods and Long-Time Approximations
Entropy 2012, 14(2), 344-369; doi:10.3390/e14020344
Article

Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics

Received: 13 January 2012; in revised form: 9 February 2012 / Accepted: 9 February 2012 / Published: 17 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Arrow of Time)
Download PDF [135 KB, uploaded 17 February 2012]
Abstract: I defend the idea that the fact that no system is entirely isolated (“Interventionism”) can be used to explain the successful use of the microcanonical distribution in statistical mechanics. The argument turns on claims about what is needed for an adequate explanation of this fact: I argue in particular that various competing explanations do not meet reasonable conditions of adequacy, and that the most striking lacuna in Interventionism—its failure to explain the “arrow of time”—is no real defect.
Keywords: interventionism; Albert; arrow of time interventionism; Albert; arrow of time
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Leeds, S. Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics. Entropy 2012, 14, 344-369.

AMA Style

Leeds S. Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics. Entropy. 2012; 14(2):344-369.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leeds, Stephen. 2012. "Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics." Entropy 14, no. 2: 344-369.


Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert