Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Interest Manager for Networked Driving Simulation Based on High-Level Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
Designs: A Multidisciplinary Open-Access Engineering Journal
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Designs 2017, 1(1), 2; doi:10.3390/designs1010002

Transmission Range Evaluations for Connected Vehicles at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

Bowhead Logistics Solutions, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, PKI 203E, 1110 S 67th Street Omaha, NE 68182-0178, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Dario Vangi
Received: 3 April 2017 / Revised: 4 May 2017 / Accepted: 9 May 2017 / Published: 12 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Road Vehicle Safety: Design and Assessment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [837 KB, uploaded 16 May 2017]   |  


This study evaluates the transmission range requirements of Connected Vehicles (CVs) at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGCs) in terms of safety improvement. The safety improvement of HRGCs is evaluated by using a reliability-based risk analysis that calculates risk of collision for CVs and non-CVs. Trains are assumed to have onboard units that transmit train location and speed information to CVs via vehicle to vehicle communications. The stopping distance and time to collision of a vehicle are the demand functions in reliability-based risk analysis. The demand functions consist of probability density functions of a vehicle’s initial speed, perception-reaction time, initial deceleration rate, final speed, and final deceleration rate. Train arrival time depending on the train speed and transmission range is the supply threshold for calculating the CV’s risk of collision at passive HRGCs. The transmission range’s projected highway distance is the supply threshold for CVs at active HRGCs. After deriving probability density functions of demand functions from the published data, Monte Carlo simulations generate the probabilities or risks that a CV would fail to stop within the transmission range or train arrival time. With the provision of a 600 m transmission range, the risk of collision for the CV is lower than that for the non-CV with a 300 m sight distance to the train at the passive HRGC. The CV’s risk of collision is lower than the non-CV’s with a 300 m transmission range at active HRGCs. The CV application at HRGCs can improve safety by reducing CVs’ risk of collision. A 600 m transmission range is desirable at passive HRGCs. A 300 m transmission is sufficient for CVs at active HRGCs. Overall, a 600 m transmission range is feasible to improve the safety at passive and active HRGCs. View Full-Text
Keywords: connected vehicles; highway-rail grade crossings; reliability-based risk analysis; transmission range connected vehicles; highway-rail grade crossings; reliability-based risk analysis; transmission range

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsu, C.-J.; Jones, E.G. Transmission Range Evaluations for Connected Vehicles at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings. Designs 2017, 1, 2.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Designs EISSN 2411-9660 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top