Next Article in Journal
Category Theory Approach to Solution Searching Based on Photoexcitation Transfer Dynamics
Next Article in Special Issue
The Unreasonable Destructiveness of Political Correctness in Philosophy
Previous Article in Journal
A New Kind of Aesthetics —The Mathematical Structure of the Aesthetic
Previous Article in Special Issue
“Political Correctness” from a “Border Reason”: Between Dignity and the Shadow of Exclusion
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Philosophies 2017, 2(3), 15; doi:10.3390/philosophies2030015

Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality

Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 13 A Moskovska Str., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 September 2016 / Revised: 30 May 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 / Published: 4 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Correctness—Towards a Global Ethos)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [211 KB, uploaded 11 July 2017]

Abstract

Nowadays political correctness (PC) is blamed by its opponents because of a failed model of multiculturalism, an influx of migrants and the threat of terrorist acts. Obviously, a definition of tolerance given by UNESCO in 1995 has lost its meaning. In order to argue a possibility of a global ethos based on new understandings of PC, the authors refer to contemporary achievements of semiotics, hermeneutics and philosophical anthropology. We use a critical method developed in the hermeneutical tradition of P. Ricoeur, J. Kristeva, Tz. Todorov and others. Criticism is directed at (1) paradoxes of postmodern philosophical attempts for justification the idea of political correctness; (2) the way of introducing new terminology, as on a language level it leads, not to inclusion, but to exclusion, of disadvantaged people because as E. Benveniste states, the third person is rather the non-person. The conclusion is that politically correct speech should be grounded on a basis which takes into account the three persons of verb conjugation. Similar philosophical and ethical ideas can be found in works of J. Kristeva, Tz. Todorov, P. Ricoeur. An example is given for how these ideas can be implemented in the fields of film and art. This is one of the possible ways of overcoming the exclusion of disadvantaged people who are only named in politically correct terms, and not as participants, in social and political dialogue. View Full-Text
Keywords: multiculturalism; terrorism; political correctness; semiotics; hermeneutics; ethics; censorship; art multiculturalism; terrorism; political correctness; semiotics; hermeneutics; ethics; censorship; art
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lichev, V.; Hristoskova, M. Political Correctness—Between Fiction and Social Reality. Philosophies 2017, 2, 15.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Philosophies EISSN 2409-9287 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top