Next Article in Journal
Food Contamination: Major Challenges of the Future
Previous Article in Journal
Breads Fortified with Freeze-Dried Vegetables: Quality and Nutritional Attributes. Part 1: Breads Containing Oil as an Ingredient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Analysis of Mineral Concentration for the Geographic Identification of Garlic Samples from Sicily (Italy), Tunisia and Spain

1
Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, V.le F. Stagno d’Alcontres 31, Messina 98166, Italy
2
IPCF- CNR of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres 37, Messina 98158, Italy
3
MIFT Department Physics Section, University of Messina, Viale F. S. d’Alcontres 31, Messina 98166, Italy
4
Department of Chemical Sciences, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental, University of Messina, Via SS. Annunziata, Messina 98168, Italy
5
Science4life srl, Academic Spin-off, Università di Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres 31, Messina 98166, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2016, 5(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010020
Submission received: 18 January 2016 / Revised: 12 February 2016 / Accepted: 4 March 2016 / Published: 15 March 2016

Abstract

:
We performed a statistical analysis of the concentration of mineral elements, by means of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), in different varieties of garlic from Spain, Tunisia, and Italy. Nubia Red Garlic (Sicily) is one of the most known Italian varieties that belongs to traditional Italian food products (P.A.T.) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry. The obtained results suggest that the concentrations of the considered elements may serve as geographical indicators for the discrimination of the origin of the different samples. In particular, we found a relatively high content of Selenium in the garlic variety known as Nubia red garlic, and, indeed, it could be used as an anticarcinogenic agent.

1. Introduction

Garlic (Allium sativum L.) and garlic supplements are consumed in many cultures for their healthy effects on different alimentary disorders and infections, and have been since the ancient times [1]. The beneficial effects on human health are mainly provided by the organosulfur compounds [2]. Nubia red garlic (NRG), belongs to the Liliaceae family, and, in particular, to the Allium Sativum species. NRG is a Sicilian garlic variety and its name derives from the intense red color of the robes of its bulbils and from the denomination of the geographic area: the small district of Nubia (Paceco, Trapani) in western Sicily (Italy). In fact, the production area of NRG falls within the region of Paceco and is in a protected area: the natural reserve named “Saline di Trapani e Paceco” (SIC, ITA01007) in Northwestern Sicily, but also extends to the neighboring area of Trapani, Marsala, Buseto Palizzolo, Valderice, and Erice.
Paceco is a small rural Centre (58 km2) and it is considered a “clean area”, because there are not industrial centres and vehicular traffic is extremely low; the local economy is based on agriculture. The soils evolve from clay rocks with a clay content of 40% to 45% (regosols) to soils of considerable thickness and uniformity characterized by deep cracks in summer (vertisols) [3]. The climate can be defined as semi-arid with average annual rainfall of about 500 mm.
Note that the NRG has been officially added to the list of traditional Italian food products (PAT) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry (M.D. 5/06/2014). NRG usually possesses a variable number (8 to 14) of tunics that are distinguished in externals (sterile tunics) with ivory-pink color that serves as protection for the cloves and internally (fertile tunics) with winey-red color from which the bulbils are formed. The bulbils are close together showing a convex dorsal surface [4].
In this paper we traced, by means of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), the multi-element profiles of several garlic samples of different geographical area. In the literature, there are many scientific reports of ICP-MS analysis for the determination of mineral concentration in food matrices including garlic [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Furthermore, nowadays there is great attention paid to the discrimination of protected foodstuffs [12,13,14]. We evaluated the statistically significant differences among the garlic samples using chemometric analyses. Furthermore, we employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to correlate each garlic sample to its corresponding geographic area. This approach is able to discriminate among different garlic samples depending on their mineral profiles. Finally, the concentration of some specific elements can be used to assess the quality of a specific cultivar. For example, the high level of selenium found in NRG samples suggests the ability of the corresponding garlic cultivar to block (or prevent) carcinogenesis [15,16]. Note that the presence of this element is strongly related to the compositional nature of the cultivation soil. Indeed, several Se-compounds can be found within garlic samples displaying many different beneficial health effects [17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

We analyzed a total of 120 garlic samples: 40 were labeled as NRG samples and 80 as “Non Nubia” samples, following the indication reported in the introduction. Figure 1 shows their different areas of origin and Table 1 reports some general related information.
All garlic samples were harvested during the last crop season. We divided the analyzed garlic samples into two main groups. The first group named “Nubia” is composed of NRG samples (of certified origin) coming from the district of Paceco and from other neighboring areas (Dattilo, Culcasi, Verderame). The second group named “Non Nubia” is composed of garlic samples of various cultivar coming from different areas of Sicily (S. Giuseppe Jato, Corleone, Prizzi, Gangi, Alcamo, Cerda), from Lerida (Spain) and Lansarin (Tunisia). Lerida is a town located 160 km west of Barcelona whereas Lansarin is a hilly area located 30 km north of Tunis. The ICP-MS analyses were performed just on the edible part of the garlic without its internal bud.

2.2. Study Site

Garlic is a bulbiferous vegetable growing underground; therefore, it absorbs the minerals present in the soil. Indeed, garlic’s multi-elemental profile is strongly dependent on the composition of the soil and is mainly linked to the geological structure and soil quality of the origin site. Relative to the analyzed garlic samples, all Nubia samples come from the Paceco geographic area located in the southeast of Trapani. The soil is prevalently clayey a with high content of potassium and a low content of organic matter [18]. The other Sicilian (Non Nubia) garlic samples originate from the geographic area between Palermo (Cerda, Corleone, Gangi, Prizzi and S. Giuseppe Jato) and Trapani (Alcamo) [19]. These places are characterized by clay soils, except for Gangi, which displays a mainly arenaceous clay.
The Spanish samples come from Lerida which is characterized by sandy soils with high levels of iron [20]. The Tunisian samples come from Lansarin, which is characterized by clayey soil with high iron concentration [21].

2.3. Chemicals and Standard Solution

High purity gases (99.9990% argon and 99.9995% helium) were supplied by Rivoira (Rivoira S.p.A., Milan, Italy). Suprapure concentrated acids (65% v/v nitric acid and 30% v/v hydrogen peroxide, J.T. Backer, Mallinckrodt Backer, Milan, Italy) were used to digest the samples. High purity water with resistivity of 10 MΩ cm (J.T. Backer, Mallinckrodt Backer, Milan, Italy) was used throughout.
Stock standard solution (1 g/L in 2% of nitric acid) of each element under investigation (Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Se, Sb, Ba, Pb, Zn, Fe, Mg, Ca, Al, Na, K) were purchased from Fluka, Milan, Italy and (Mn and Cd) from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Standard solutions of Sc, Bi, In, Ge (1 g/L in 2% nitric acid) were purchased from Fluka (Milan, Italy) and were used as on-line internal standards (at the level of 1 mg/L) to correct for instrumental drift and variation due to the matrix.
To tune the instrument, an ICP-MS tuning solution containing 1 mg/L of 7Li, 59Co, 80Y and 205Tl in 2% HNO3 was obtained from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Calibration standards were prepared at concentration ranges suitable for the analytes being investigated: from 0.020 to 2 mg/kg for the elements Al, As, Cd, Cr, Sb, Pb, Se; from 0.020 to 5 mg/kg for the elements Ba, Cu, Ni; from 0.5 to 50 mg/kg for the elements Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Zn. The calibration curves were obtained by using five standard solutions. The internal Re standard was prepared at 0.8 μg/L. Before use, glassware was washed with 5% HNO3 for at the least 12 h, rinsed with ultrapure water, and then dried.
Accuracy and precision were assessed by analysing the certified standard matrices: rice flour (NIST SRM 1568a) [22]; spinach leaves (NIST SRM 1570a); cabbage powder (IAEA-359).

2.4. Sample Preparation

Approximately 0.5 g of fresh garlic was firstly added with 1 mL of internal Re standard at 0.8 μg/L, and then were digested with 8 mL of HNO3 (65% v/v) and 2 mL of H2O2 (30% v/v) in acid-prewashed PTFE vessels. The mineralization was carried out with a microwave oven at constant power (1000 W). First the temperature was increased to 180 °C in 10 min (step 1), and then it was held at 180 °C for another 10 min (step 2). After cooling down to room temperature, the digested samples were weighed. Then, 500 mg were transferred into pre-cleaned 50 mL volumetric flasks and diluted until the mark using deionized water. Finally, they were stored at 4 °C before acquisition.

2.5. Instrumentation

We obtained the mineralization of garlic samples by means of Ethos 1 (Milestone, Bergamo, Italy), a closed-vessel microwave digestion system equipped with sensors for temperature and pressure. The ICP-MS instrument used for the element determination is an Agilent 7500cx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an MS spectrometer powered by a 27.12 MHz radiofrequency solid-state generator at 1500 W. The ICP-MS was equipped with a MicroMist glass concentric pneumatic nebulizer coupled with a cooled Scott double pass type spray chamber made of quartz. The ICP torch was a classic Fassel-type torch with wide diameter (2.5 mm) fitted with a shield torch system. Ni sampler and skimmer cones of 1.0 mm and 0.4 mm were used. An octopole collision/reaction system with helium gas was used to minimize polyatomic interferences resulting from plasma and matrix.
The equipment is provided with an off-axis ion lens, a quadrupole mass analyzer, and an electron multiplier detector. Our instrument also includes an auto sampler ASX520 (Cetac Technologies Inc., Omaha, NE, USA) and an integrated sample introduction system.

2.6. ICP-MS Analysis

ICP-MS is one of the most sensitive analytical techniques for fast multi-element determination of mineral elements at trace and ultra-trace concentrations in different sample matrices. The use of ICP-MS as a simultaneous multi-element detection method presents excellent selectivity and also offers high sensitivity [23]. In this paper, the instrument was tuned to achieve the best compromise between high intensities and low yields of oxidized and doubly charged ions. The operating conditions were optimized to obtain the highest signal-to-noise ratio for 7Li, 59Co, 115In, and 238U along with 140Ce, 16O/140Ce < 2.5% and 140Ce and 16O < 5%. In particular, we used: RF power, 1500 W; plasma gas flow rate, 15 L/min; auxiliary gas flow rate, 0.9 L/min; carrier gas flow rate 1.1 L/min; helium collision gas flow rate, 4 mL/min; spray chamber temperature, 2 °C; sample depth, 9 mm; sample introduction flow rate 1 mL/min; nebulizer pump, 0.1 rps; extract lens 1 voltage, 1.5 V. The instrument in no gas-mode for Mn, Pb, Zn, Ca, Na, K, Ba and in helium mode for Cr, Ni, As, Se, Cd, Fe, Cu, Sb, Al to remove spectral interferences has been used. Monitored isotopes were 24Mg, 23Na, 27Al, 39K, 44Ca, 52Cr, 55Mn, 57Fe, 60Ni, 63Cu, 66Zn, 75As, 77Se, 111Cd, 121Sb, 137Ba, 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb. As mentioned above, these isotopes were chosen to maximize sensitivity and to minimize interferences due to the matrix. The internal standards used were: 45Sc for Al, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu; 72Ge for Zn, As, Se; 115In for Cd, Sb, Ba; 209Bi for Pb. Integration times were 0.5 s/point for As, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Se, and 0.1 s/point for the other elements. Three points for each mass and three replicate acquisitions were taken to integrate the peaks.
The effects of 40Ar, 35Cl on 75As, and of 44Ca, 16O and 43Ca, 16OH on 60Ni were checked and the interferences were corrected by elemental interference equations. Besides, the isotopic variability in Pb was corrected by elemental interference equation. These equations, reported in various EPA methods and applied by the instrument software (ICP-MS ChemStation B.03.07, Waldbronn, Germany), contain the naturally occurring isotope ratios of elements and allow the subtraction of isobaric or polyatomic interferences.

2.7. Statistical Methods

All statistical calculations were made by IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 21 software package. The starting matrix was constituted by 120 rows corresponding to all the analyzed garlic samples and by 11 columns (variables) representing the concentration of the observed elements (Ba, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Se, Zn, Ni) that we found in our samples. For the preliminary statistical analysis, the data were grouped into 12 categories according to the geographic origin of samples. We calculated the average, the standard deviation, the skewness, and the kurtosis for each category. In particular, in this way we studied (i) the dispersion from the average by using the standard deviation (SD); (ii) the shape of the distribution of the collected data by means of the skewness; and (iii) a measure of the asymmetry and of the “peakedness” by means of the kurtosis. The obtained values are reported in Table 2 and confirm the goodness of the achieved data. Successively, the data in the starting matrix were subjected to Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in order to reduce data dimensionality and to cluster them depending on the total content of metals (see section Multivariate Statistical Analysis).

3. Results

3.1. Method Validation

According to international guidelines [24], the limit of detection (LOD), the limit of quantification (LOQ), the linearity, the accuracy, and the precision were determined to validate the method (Table 3). LOD and LOQ were determined as 3.3 σ/S and 10 σ/S, respectively, where “σ” is the residual standard deviation and “S” is the slope of the regression curve. Nevertheless, since a garlic standard certified matrix for trace element determination was not found in commerce, the certified references used for validation were: rice flour (NIST SRM 1568a) [22]; spinach leaves (NIST SRM 1570a); cabbage powder (IAEA-359). Precision was estimated on the relative standard deviation of measurements obtained from 10 analyses of the same certified matrices under the same operating conditions. Table 3 shows that the detection and quantification limits are adequate for the analysis; the linearity was good with R2 ≥ 0.9991, the accuracy and precision were also sufficiently satisfactory. Note that the accuracy can vary from 80% to 120% depending on the ratio between the measured metals concentration and that certified by the producer of the analysed matrix.

3.2. Multi-Element Profile of Garlic Samples

Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics on the trace elements that we detected in our garlic samples, grouped for sampling area. We did not report any values for As, Pb, Cd, Cr, Sb, or Al because their concentration was below the LOD. Nickel (Ni) was the only toxic element detected in all the studied samples. As it is well known, Ni at high doses has a toxic effect on human health. For example, the oral median lethal dose of nickel acetate was 350 mg/kg in rats and 420 mg/kg in mice [25,26]. However, the Nickel concentration found in all garlic samples are very low and cannot cause any injury to human health.
Indeed, Nickel concentration could serve as a biomarker for geographical origin. In fact, from the inspection of Table 2, the garlic samples coming from Tunisia and Spain possess the highest Ni level. Moreover, particularly significant is the comparison between Selenium (Se) levels in the analyzed samples. The concentration of this element is higher in NRG samples compared to Non Nubia samples.

3.3. Multivariate Statistical Analysis

As mentioned before, we performed a multivariate statistical analysis in terms of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA). It is an “unsupervised” statistical method that can reduce data dimensionality and allows data clustering with respect to the considered variables. Data were mean-centered and the singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithm was applied to perform a PCA with cross validation. The PCA technique allowed the reduction of the data dimensionality from 11 to 2 with a variance percentage higher than 70%. Figure 2 reports the resulting score plot, together with the corresponding loadings (top and right axes), of the first two principal components (PC1 vs. PC2). The score plot illustrates how this kind of analysis is able to discriminate the different garlic species, being able to cluster and group the sample depending on the relative content of metals. The corresponding loadings plot (top and right axes of Figure 2) is used to identify the bases of the clustering. In particular, samples from Nubia (N1) and Dattilo (N2) can be mainly discriminated because they show the highest levels of Zn and Se. In fact, as shown in Table 2, for these samples the average concentration of Zn is 17.63 and 18.84 mg/kg, and the average concentration of Se is 0.244 and 0.221 mg/kg, respectively. Samples from Culcasi (N3) show the highest content of Ba and Cu (0.860 and 3.261 mg/kg, respectively) whereas those from Verderame (N4) show the highest content of Ca and Mn: 1823 and 13.336 mg/kg, respectively. Finally, note that the samples from Spain and Tunisia show the highest content of Fe (25.10 and 29.97 mg/kg, respectively) and Ni (0.669 and 0.651 mg/kg, respectively).

4. Discussion

On average, garlic contains approximately 65% water, 28% carbohydrates (fructans), 2.3% organosulfur compounds, 2% proteins (alliinase), 1.2% free amino acids (e.g., arginine) and 1.5% fibers. Allicin is the main active substance that is responsible for the typical pungent smell and for garlic’s therapeutic properties [27,28,29]. When fresh garlic is chopped or crushed, alliin (a sulfoxide that is a natural constituent of fresh garlic) transforms into allicin by the action of an enzyme called alliinase. However, allicin is an unstable compound and easily oxidable into a series of other sulfur-containing compounds such as diallyl disulfide. Furthermore, for condensation reactions, allicin can be converted into ajoenes [30], into vinyldithiins [31], and into thiosulfinates that also have a good curative action [32]. Besides allicin, garlic contains different compounds able to produce many beneficial effects for health. For this reason, garlic is used not only as flavoring but also for healing in many cultures [33].
The overall results of our analysis show that the application of Principal Component Analysis to the measured minerals content allows for sample discrimination. Samples of NRG show an average content of Se, K, Zn, and Ca that is higher than Non Nubia samples and an extremely low Ni concentration, especially if compared with samples from Spain and Tunisia. Note that just the Selenium levels are one order of magnitude higher in NRG samples. Since many healthy beneficial effects of garlic are related to the presence of different Seleno-compounds [17], this suggests the use of garlic and in particular of that coming from the Paceco district for preventing or blocking carcinogenesis. In fact, the association between reduced risk in intestinal cancer and high intake of garlic was investigated by the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Several epidemiological studies suggest that the consumption of garlic and related allium foods reduces the risk of certain cancer types, including those of the gastrointestinal tract [34,35]. The potential benefits of garlic as an anticancer agent is indeed mainly due to its ability to accumulate Selenium, which is a cancer fighting mineral.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we determined the multi-elemental profiles of different garlic samples by ICP-MS analysis in order to individuate through a multivariate statistical analysis which elements may be considered as geographic indicators for the discrimination of origin. We analyzed four garlic varieties coming from the district of Paceco (TP, Sicily, Italy), known as Nubia Red Garlic (NRG) and certified as traditional Italian food products (P.A.T.) by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry [36], and compared with six other varieties coming from different places within Sicily and with two varieties coming from Spain and Tunisia. Garlic is widely consumed in different parts of the world and many studies report its healthy protective effect against many different diseases, independent of the specific cultivar and from the particular geographic origin of the garlic. The healthy effects of garlic depend on the level of some mineral elements, such as Se, K, Zn, and Ca. In particular, the high content of Selenium found in NRG samples identifies this element, not only as an indicator for the discrimination of geographic origin of this cultivar, but it is also useful to demonstrate that Nubia Red Garlic shows important health qualities and could be used as an anticarcinogenic agent.

Author Contributions

Rossella Vadalà and Giuseppe D. Bua: ICP-MS Analisys; Antonio F. Mottese: Geological study of the area; Andrea Salvo: ICP-MS Analisys and data processing; Domenico Mallamace, Sebastiano Vasi and Giacomo Dugo: obtaining samples; Carmelo Corsaro, Salvatore V. Giofrè and Maria Alfa: data processing; Nicola Cicero: ICP-MS Analisys, data processing and coordination of work writing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NRGNubia Red Garlic
PATProduct agriculture Traditional
ICP-MSInductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
PCAPrincipal Components Analysis
LODLimit of Detection
LOQLimit of Quantification
SVDSingular Value Decomposition
PCPrincipal Component

References

  1. Block, E. The chemistry of garlic and onions. Sci. Am. 1985, 252, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ramaa, C.S.; Shirode, A.R.; Mundada, A.S.; Kadam, V.J. Nutraceuticals: An emerging era in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2006, 7, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Catalano, R.; Lo Cicero, G. Guida alle escursioni-Vol 1-La Sicilia Occidentale. In Procceedings of the 79° Congresso Nazionale della Società Geologica Italiana, Palermo, Italy, 18–20 September 1998.
  4. Lazzarini, E. Gli Ortaggi e le Piante Aromatiche; Hoepli: Milan, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Bella, G.; Potortì, A.G.; Lo Turco, V.; Bua, D.; Licata, P.; Cicero, N.; Dugo, G. Trace Elements In Thunnus Thynnus From Mediterranean Sea: Benefit-Risk Assessment For Consumer. Food Addit. Contam. 2015, 8, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lo Turco, V.; Di Bella, G.; Furci, P.; Cicero, N.; Pollicino, G.; Dugo, G. Heavy metals content by ICP-OES in Sarda sarda, Sardinella aurita and Lepidopus caudatus from Straits of Messina (Sicily, Italy). Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 27, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naccari, C.; Cicero, N.; Ferrantelli, V.; Giangrosso, G.; Vella, A.; Macaluso, A.; Naccari, F.; Dugo, G. Toxic metals in pelagic, benthic and demersal fish species from Mediterranean FAO zone 37. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 95, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Salvo, A.; Cicero, N.; Vadalà, R.; Mottese, A.F.; Bua, D.; Mallamace, D.; Giannetto, C.; Dugo, G. Toxic and essential metals determination in commercial seafood: Paracentrotus lividus by ICP-MS. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 30, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Salvo, A.; Potortì, A.G.; Cicero, N.; Bruno, M.; Lo Turco, V.; Di Bella, G.; Dugo, G. Statistical characterisation of heavy metal contents in Paracentrotus lividus from Mediterranean Sea. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Poldma, P.; Tonutare, T.; Viitak, A.; Luik, A.; Moor, U. Effect of Selenium Treatment on Mineral Nutrition, Bulb Size, and Antioxidant Properties of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5498–5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Camargo, A.B.; Resnizky, S.; Marchevsky, E.J.; Luco, J.M. Use of the Argentinean garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm mineral profile for determining geographic origin. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cicero, N.; Corsaro, C.; Salvo, A.; Vasi, S.; Giofre, S.V.; Ferrantelli, V.; Di Stefano, V.; Mallamace, D.; Dugo, G. The metabolic profile of lemon juice by proton HR-MAS NMR: The case of the PGI Interdonato Lemon of Messina. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 1894–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Corsaro, C.; Mallamace, D.; Vasi, S.; Ferrantelli, V.; Dugo, G.; Cicero, N. H HR-MAS NMR Spectroscopy and the Metabolite Determination of Typical Foods in Mediterranean Diet. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mallamace, D.; Corsaro, C.; Salvo, A.; Cicero, N.; Macaluso, A.; Giangrosso, G.; Ferrantelli, V.; Dugo, G. A multivariate statistical analysis coming from the NMR metabolic profile of cherry tomatoes (The Sicilian Pachino case). Phys. A 2014, 401, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Das, S. Garlic—A natural source of cancer preventive compounds. Asian Pac. J Cancer Prev. 2002, 3, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Santhoscha, S.G.; Jamuna, P.; Prabhavathi, S.N. Bioactive components of garlic and their physiological role in health maintenance: A rewiew. Food Biosci. 2013, 3, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arnault, I.; Auger, J. Seleno compounds in garlic and onion. J. Chromatog. A 2006, 1112, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Parrinello, A.M.; Amato, A.; Cordella, C.; Pizzo, A. L’aglio nel territorio della S.O.A.T. di Paceco; Regione Siciliana, Assessorato Agricoltura E Foreste, IX Servizio Regionale Assistenza Tecnica, Sperimentazione, Ricerca Applicata E Divulgazione; Assessorato Agricoltura, Regione Sicilia: Palermo, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Maetzke, F.; Cullotta, S.; La Mantia, T.; La Mela Veca, D.S.; Pizzurro, G.M. Individuazione di aree ecologicamente omogenee e di un sistema di aree a priorità di intervento per l’ampliamento della superficie forestale in Sicilia. Forest 2008, 5, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tumea, P.; Bechb, J.; Tumec, L.; Bechd, J.; Revertere, F.; Longanb, L.; Cendoya, P. Concentrations and distributions of Ba, Cr, Sr, V, Al, and Fe in Torrelles soil profiles (Catalonia, Spain). J. Geochem. Explor. 2008, 96, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshida, M.; Kallali, H. Environmental Magnetic Study of Surface Soil/Sediment in Northern Tunisia—Field Screening for Potentially Toxic Elements Contamination. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Recent Advance in Exploration Geophysics in Kyoto (RAEG2003), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, January 2003.
  22. Zhu, Y.; Umemurab, T.; Haraguchib, H.; Inagakia, K.; Chibaa, K. Determination of REEs in seawater by ICP-MS after on-line preconcentration using a syringe-driven chelating column. Talanta 2009, 78, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gonzàlvez, A.; Armenta, S.; Cervera, M.L.; De La Guardia, M. Elemental composition of seasoning products. Talanta 2008, 74, 1085–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ellison, S.L.R.; Williams, A. European Pharmacopoeia Technical Guide, Eurachem/Citac Guide Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 3rd ed.; LGC: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dorant, E.; Van Den Brandt, P.A.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Hermus, R.J.; Sturmans, F. Garlic and its significance for the prevention of cancer in humans: A critical review. Br. J. Cancers 1993, 67, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, T.S.C. Medicinal Plants; Technomic Publ. Co.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Denkhaus, E.; Salnikow, K. Nickel essentiality, toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2002, 42, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. National Research Council. Medical and Biological Effects of Environmental Pollutants. Nickel; Committee on Medical and Biological Effects of Environmental Pollutants, National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  29. Macpherson, L.J.; Geierstanger, B.H.; Viswanath, V.; Bandell, M.; Eid, S.R.; Hwang, S.W.; Patapoutian, A. The pungency of garlic: Activation of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in response to allicin. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Song, K.; Milner, J.A. The influence of heating on the anticancer properties of garlic. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1054s–1057s. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Yoshida, H.; Katsuzaki, H.; Ohta, R.; Ishikawa, K.; Fukuda, H.; Fujino, T.; Suzuki, A. An organosulfur compound isolated from oil-macerated garlic extract and its antimicrobial effect. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 588–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lawson, L.D.; Wang, Z.J. Alliin and Allicin-Derived garlic compounds increases breath acetone through Allyl Methyl Sulfide; use in measuring Allicin bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1974–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lawson, L.D.; Hughes, B.G. Characterization of the formation of allicin and other thiosulfinates from garlic. Planta Med. 1992, 58, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rivlin, R.S. Historical perspective on the use of garlic. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 951S–954S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Steinmetz, K.A.; Kushi, L.H.; Bostick, R.M.; Folsome, A.R.; Potter, J.D. Vegetables fruit and colon cancer in the Iowa Women’s health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994, 139, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Ministerial Decree. 5 June 2014 Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali G.U. Supplemento Ordinario; n. 48; 20 June 2014; XIV Revisione dell’Elenco Nazionale dei Prodotti Agroalimentari Tradizionali; MIPAAF: Roma, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geographic localization of Nubia and Non Nubia garlic samples.
Figure 1. Geographic localization of Nubia and Non Nubia garlic samples.
Foods 05 00020 g001
Figure 2. Score (left and bottom axes) and loadings (right and top axes) plot showing the results of the PCA performed on all the analyzed garlic samples.
Figure 2. Score (left and bottom axes) and loadings (right and top axes) plot showing the results of the PCA performed on all the analyzed garlic samples.
Foods 05 00020 g002
Table 1. General information about the studied garlic samples.
Table 1. General information about the studied garlic samples.
Sample SourceLatitude NorthLongitude EastNS aBulb Das b (mm)Bulb Aw c (g)Bulbils An dBulbils Aw c (g)
NRG SAMPLES
N1Nubia37°58′43.58′′12°30′42.27′′105045.21133.12
N2Dattilo37°58′13.68′′12°38′20.62′′104844.92133.33
N3Culcasi37°58′36.98′′12°29′57.53′′104944.72133.24
N4Verderame37°58′10.96′′12°32′36.88′′105245.63132.96
NON NUBIA SAMPLES
N5Alcamo37°58′39.26′′12°58′33.76′′104842.86133.19
N6Cerda37°54′12.80′′13°48′53.48′′104543.56133.25
N7Corleone37°48′42.31′′13°17′39.11′′104339.2112.86
N8Gangi37°47′34.42′′14°11′59.66′′104544.02123.56
N9Prizzi37°42′53.15′′13°25′49.59′′104743.23123.51
N10San G. Jato37°58′07.17′′13°10′41.08′′104641.71123.37
N11Lerida (Spain)41°35′08.58′′0°42′18.85′′105551.03104.97
N12Lansarin (Tunisia)37°03′46.60′′10°06′33.33′′104742.73123.26
a NS, Number of Samples; b das, diameter average size; c aw, average weight; d an, average number.
Table 2. General information about the studied garlic samples.
Table 2. General information about the studied garlic samples.
Sample Source Elements Concentration (mg/kg)
Nubia Rec Garlic SamplesN1Nubia BaCaCuFeKMgMnNaSeZnNi
Mean0.51818002.53123.105920269.710.3998.560.24417.630.048
Std. Dev.0.096110.80.2111.15636.805.8140.7024.6850.4301.7670.007
Skewness−0.150−0.3780.308−0.0370.951−0.1060.431−0.0840.0590.1070.089
Kurtosis0.815−0.501−1.3310.0830.109−0.7150.551−1.25−1.489−1.06−0.849
Range0.328–0.6361585–19762.246–2.86021.07–25.005877–5988259.5–379.69.40–11.8791.63–105.80.187–0.31314.67–20.380.037–0.061
N2DattiloMean0.54617232.84320.767154254.413.08110.90.22118.840.047
Std. Dev.0.11692.570.0950.904178.578.5770.4057.4460.0232.8380.006
Skewness0.576−0.118−0.4211.099−0.190−1.1050.511−0.1020.8730.0610.899
Kurtosis0.021−0.4130.8481.714−0.3461.1380.357−0.8930.8440.6880.849
Range0.398–0.7711575–18752.652–2.99619.76–22.766849–7441235.9–263.612.44–13.8698.61–119.20.194–0.27114.90–23.690.038–0.061
N3CulcasiMean0.86017403.26124.106253264.0213.250114.430.15216.560.042
Std. Dev.0.107138.670.1910.724277.794.720.46110.0650.0182.0140.008
Skewness−0.651−0.446−0.218−0.1420.6690.6390.053−0.332−2.065−0.5610.263
Kurtosis−1.414−1.486−1.569−1.076−1.173−1.415−1.267−0.3645.2290.0077−1.398
Range0.685–0.9761523–19112.998–3.49823.08–25.165978–6742259.16–271.4212.55–13.8199.16–131.010.104–0.17112.91–19.690.031–0.055
N4VerderameMean0.68718233.11015.6717041282.9513.33697.060.16515.310.047
Std. Dev.0.132119.860.1341.442141.2810.2950.7943.0720.411.4370.008
Skewness−0.5350.0750.402−1.444−0.6200.468−1.517−0.7210.458−0.591−1.055
Kurtosis−0.983−1.239−0.8342.2871.664−1.0990.9350.2050.6042.2810.631
Range0.473–0.8501653–19892.915–3.33212.34–17.006740–7249270.42–300.0111.77–13.9890.95–101.300.110–0.24812.26–17.840.029–0.057
Non Nubia SamplesN5AlcamoMean0.21112740.94624.634349245.567.52994.130.1969.2490.122
Std. Dev.0.023235.940.0621.423307.0425.5290.35611.960.0031.4950.015
Skewness−0.754−0.541−0.491−0.4620.5571.554−0.777−1.874−0.2211.0470.765
Kurtosis−1.082−3.232−2.295−2.462−2.4572.322−2.2423.74−1.3171.9980.182
Range0.178−0.2361010–14780.867–1.01222.81–25.964080–4746225.79–287.987.04–7.8973.45–103.250.015–0.0247.570–11.620.105–0.146
N6CerdaMean0.33215922.81117.894663277.5312.204100.6980.0458.9930.468
Std. Dev.0.1195.300.1270.183138.70110.3681.181.4930.0152.6530.337
Skewness−0.794−0.446−1.5330.6050.044−0.621−0.8060.487−0.2350.053−0.552
Kurtosis−1.833−0.2632.388−1.601−1.927−1.011−1.703−0.463−0.922−2.5−3.216
Range0.178–0.4261456–17012.600–2.91717.72–18.144522–4840264.37–290.8410.54–13.2598.98–102.810.025–0.0645.923–12.000.066–0.117
N7CorleoneMean0.22015152.20113.743442248.5711.045119.200.0458.1130.057
Std. Dev.0.042176.350.2740.192573.0129.6810.6063.5290.0140.6860.022
Skewness0.188−1.303 0.3070.2770.461−1.9380.424−0.531−0.1921.188−0.678
Kurtosis−1.8470.562−1.458−0.137−3.0823.849−1.581−0.1851.4611.3701.054
Range0.175–0.2751237–16361.875–2.56013.50–14.012875–4087197.00–269.3110.41–11.86114.11–123.210.025–0.0657.500–9.2000.024–0.084
N8GangiMean0.222967.02.11417.254304294.788.81584.0750.0289.5150.112
Std. Dev.0.08356.510.1790.228353.747.3820.24130.2560.0081.2820.031
Skewness0.5880.3610.037−0.9220.8240.034−1.5362.1601.886−0.7700.005
Kurtosis−3.183−0.600−2.5451,154−0.4320.0062.3194.7283.859−2.266−0.529
Range0.150–0.320899.0–10451.913–2.32216.89–17.503981–4827284.98–304.658.41–9.0265.71–137.820.021–0.0438.160–11.080.070–0.153
N9PrizziMean0.19010161.95913.704294275.3610.197135.750.056.6280.073
Std. Dev.0.03263.900.0980.371244.4116.5440.47610.430.01900.6790.015
Skewness−0.3530.473−1.919−1.4290.071−1.7090.825−0.265−1.1851.6510.363
Kurtosis−2.309−2.1584.0502.113−2.733.161−1.096−1.5171.6583.099−2.662
Range0.150–0.225947.0–10981.787–2.04013.08–14.004023–4566247.25–289.209.77–10.88121.86–147.210.019–0.0706.016–7.7770.056–0.092
N10San G. JatoMean0.21114471.80614.233029.4184.2010.489113.900.06711.690.061
Std. Dev.0.02876.100.0400.52659.793.990.5315.560.0164.1090.012
Skewness0.3160.9001.7400.8851.5290.742−0.0030.829−0.3342.066−1.519
Kurtosis−2.1560.9183.256−0.7342.561−0.573−2.310.992−2.1324.3352.445
Range0.117–0.2461365–15641.776–1.87513.72–14.992980–3129180.11–190.019.87–11.12107.62–122.400.046–0.0859.200–18.920.040–0.071
N11SpainMean0.216804.60.96025.102898164.086.347132.460.0310.230.669
Std. Dev.0.086107.160.1440.260185.3010.130.39934.5480.012.4460.262
Skewness1.2750.4190.8020.640−0.845−0.3790.4890.0990.343−0.376−1.284
Kurtosis2.721−1.3750.317−0.393−0.3060.651−1.549−2.34−0.457−0.2451.567
Range0.098–0.415675.0–982.00.764–1.24524.78–25.572537–3088145.96–181.525.92–6.9896.52–176.210.015–0.0516.160–13.940.092–0.910
N12TunisiaMean0.187698.21.13729.973268270.6110.17397.550.0179.3500.651
Std. Dev.0.08964.4180.1580.326201.810.9760.5775.5550.0052.7850.299
Skewness0.1120.4220.3812.285−0.0740.385−0.549−1.0891.050.637−1.373
Kurtosis−1.978−1.560−1.0315.813−0.9930.0830.1711.7430.188−0.8250.558
Range0.105–0.300618.0–798.00.957–1.41229.69–30.812968–3555251.54–288.289.02–10.8485.27–104.250.012–0.0275.94–13.740.102–0.910
Table 3. Analytical performance of the method.
Table 3. Analytical performance of the method.
ElementIsotopeLOD a (mg/kg)LOQ b (mg/kg)Calibration Range (mg/kg)R 2 cPrecision (SDR%, n = 10) dAccuracy e (%)
Al270.0150.0520.020–20.99982.985.63
As750.0100.0350.020–20.99962.689.78
Ba1370.0150.0520.020–50.99993.790.71
Ca440.0170.0590.5–500.99932.9101.54
Cd1110.0180.0630.020–20.99992.794.53
Cr520.0110.0380.020–20.99982.491.78
Cu630.0180.0630.020–50.99992.186.56
Fe570.0170.0590.5–500.99992.296.54
K390.0160.0560.5–500.99913.6102.31
Mg240.0150.0520.5–500.99933.3101.44
Mn550.0140.0490.5–500.99992.9102.9
Na230.0160.0560.5–500.99972.686.76
Ni600.0100.0350.020–50.99993.283.32
Sb1210.0120.0420.020–20.99992.893.68
Pb2080.0110.0380.020–20.99992.194.37
Se770.0100.0350.020–20.99952.585.89
Zn660.0160.0560.5–500.99993.197.32
a LOD, limit of detection (3.3 σ/S); b LOQ, limit of quantification (10 σ/S); c R2, least square regression coefficient; d SDR, Standard Deviation Ratio; e Average of 10 replicates.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vadalà, R.; Mottese, A.F.; Bua, G.D.; Salvo, A.; Mallamace, D.; Corsaro, C.; Vasi, S.; Giofrè, S.V.; Alfa, M.; Cicero, N.; et al. Statistical Analysis of Mineral Concentration for the Geographic Identification of Garlic Samples from Sicily (Italy), Tunisia and Spain. Foods 2016, 5, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010020

AMA Style

Vadalà R, Mottese AF, Bua GD, Salvo A, Mallamace D, Corsaro C, Vasi S, Giofrè SV, Alfa M, Cicero N, et al. Statistical Analysis of Mineral Concentration for the Geographic Identification of Garlic Samples from Sicily (Italy), Tunisia and Spain. Foods. 2016; 5(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vadalà, Rossella, Antonio F. Mottese, Giuseppe D. Bua, Andrea Salvo, Domenico Mallamace, Carmelo Corsaro, Sebastiano Vasi, Salvatore V. Giofrè, Maria Alfa, Nicola Cicero, and et al. 2016. "Statistical Analysis of Mineral Concentration for the Geographic Identification of Garlic Samples from Sicily (Italy), Tunisia and Spain" Foods 5, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop