Display options:
Normal
Show Abstracts
Compact
Select/unselect all
Displaying article 1-3
p. 1-4
Received: 6 December 2012 / Accepted: 11 December 2012 / Published: 12 December 2012
Show/Hide Abstract
| Download PDF Full-text (137 KB) | Download XML Full-text Abstract: Publishing, and by extension publication, is in a state of rapid flux. This has become evident in recent years, and some have now even characterized the domain as unstable, with the traditional forms of publication no longer being sustainable.[...]
p. 5-15
Received: 30 January 2013; in revised form: 4 April 2013 / Accepted: 7 April 2013 / Published: 12 April 2013
Show/Hide Abstract
| Download PDF Full-text (194 KB) | Download XML Full-text Abstract: The move from subscription only publishing of scholarly articles to open access has been much slower than previously anticipated by many Open Access (OA) advocates. Despite the many advantages that OA offers, this particular branch of E-commerce imposes several formidable barriers to change. A framework conceptualizing these barriers that was developed over a decade ago was revisited to see if the significance of these barriers has changed. Nowadays, building the IT infrastructure, support from indexing services and finding a sustainable business model are no longer important barriers. For gold OA publishing the academic reward system is still a major obstacle, whereas more marketing and critical mass is needed for both gold OA and green OA. Green OA self-archiving is still also strongly affected by what subscription publishers allow. In the overall balance the situation has nevertheless improved significantly.
p. 16-26
Received: 12 April 2013; in revised form: 27 April 2013 / Accepted: 27 April 2013 / Published: 6 May 2013
Show/Hide Abstract
| Download PDF Full-text (200 KB) | Download XML Full-text Abstract: This study assessed characteristics of publishers who published 2010 open access (OA) journals indexed in Scopus. Publishers were categorized into six types; professional, society, university, scholar/researcher, government, and other organizations. Type of publisher was broken down by number of journals/articles published in 2010, funding model, location, discipline and whether the journal was born or converted to OA. Universities and societies accounted for 50% of the journals and 43% of the articles published. Professional publisher accounted for a third of the journals and 42% of the articles. With the exception of professional and scholar/researcher publishers, most journals were originally subscription journals that made at least their digital version freely available. Arts, humanities and social science journals are largely published by societies and universities outside the major publishing countries. Professional OA publishing is most common in biomedicine, mathematics, the sciences and engineering. Approximately a quarter of the journals are hosted on national/international platforms, in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia largely published by universities and societies without the need for publishing fees. This type of collaboration between governments, universities and/or societies may be an effective means of expanding open access publications.
Select/unselect all
Displaying article 1-3
Export citation of selected articles as:
Plain Text
BibTeX
BibTeX (without abstracts)
Endnote
Endnote (without abstracts)
Tab-delimited
PubMed XML
DOAJ XML
AGRIS XML