Figure 1.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 1.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 2.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 2.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 3.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 3.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 4.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 4.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 5.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 5.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 6.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 6.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 7.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 7.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 8.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Figure 8.
Basins of attraction for , , , , , respectively for .
Table 1.
Comparison of different methods without memory.
Table 1.
Comparison of different methods without memory.
Without Memory Methods | | | | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | | | |
() | 1.1717 | | | 3.0000 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.312 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.329 |
() | | | | 2.9993 | 0.343 |
() | | | | 3.0008 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 2.9990 | 0.281 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 2.9961 | 0.578 |
() | | | | 2.9946 | 0.656 |
() | | | | 2.9950 | 0.749 |
() | | | | 2.7546 | 0.594 |
() | | | | 2.7518 | 0.843 |
() | | | | 3.1314 | 0.751 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.0008 | 0.345 |
() | | | | 2.9971 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 3.0019 | 0.359 |
() | | | | 2.9994 | 0.358 |
() | | | | 3.0020 | 0.328 |
() | | | | 2.9993 | 0.390 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 2.8943 | 0.250 |
() | | | | 2.7963 | 0.266 |
() | | | | 2.7547 | 0.328 |
() | F | F | F | # | - |
() | F | F | F | # | - |
() | F | F | F | # | - |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.1821 | 0.422 |
() | | | | 3.5597 | 0.406 |
() | | | | 3.4779 | 0.328 |
() | C | C | C | * | - |
() | C | C | C | * | - |
() | C | C | C | * | - |
Table 2.
Comparison of different methods with memory.
Table 2.
Comparison of different methods with memory.
With Memory Methods | | | | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.3435 | 0.407 |
() | | | | 3.3362 | 0.407 |
() | | | | 3.3434 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 2.4151 | 0.343 |
() | | | | 2.0037 | 0.312 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.6558 | 0.859 |
() | | | | 3.6119 | 0.875 |
() | | | | 3.6550 | 0.938 |
() | | | | 2.4624 | 0.672 |
() | | | | 1.9291 | 0.657 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.4661 | 0.516 |
() | | | | 3.4917 | 0.468 |
() | | | | 3.4628 | 0.422 |
() | | | | 2.4298 | 0.313 |
() | | | | 2.1886 | 0.297 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.4326 | 0.250 |
() | | | | 3.2771 | 0.250 |
() | | | | 3.2331 | 0.296 |
() | | | | | 0.359 |
() | | | | | 0.282 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 4.2117 | 0.360 |
() | | | | 6.8399 | 0.421 |
() | | | | 4.0907 | 0.485 |
() | C | C | C | * | - |
() | C | C | C | * | - |
Table 3.
Comparison of different methods without memory for real-life problems.
Table 3.
Comparison of different methods without memory for real-life problems.
Without Memory Methods | | | | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.392 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.390 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.375 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.313 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.328 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.329 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 2.9887 | 0.234 |
() | | | | 2.9976 | 0.218 |
() | | | | 2.9912 | 0.250 |
() | | | | 3.0008 | 0.282 |
() | | | | 2.9774 | 0.234 |
() | | | | 2.9830 | 0.234 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.0049 | 0.359 |
() | | | | 3.0056 | 0.360 |
() | | | | 3.0096 | 0.376 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 3.0246 | 0.313 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.296 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 2.9998 | 0.390 |
() | | | | 2.9999 | 0.375 |
() | | | | 2.9998 | 0.376 |
() | | | | 2.9994 | 0.328 |
() | | | | 2.9996 | 0.406 |
() | | | | 3.0001 | 0.375 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.0002 | 0.298 |
() | | | | 3.0001 | 0.327 |
() | | | | 3.0003 | 0.328 |
() | | | | 3.0000 | 0.313 |
() | | | | 3.0002 | 0.297 |
() | | | | 3.0003 | 0.234 |
Table 4.
Comparison of different methods with memory for real life problems.
Table 4.
Comparison of different methods with memory for real life problems.
With Memory Methods | | | | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.3297 | 0.359 |
() | | | | 3.3318 | 0.344 |
() | | | | 3.3293 | 0.297 |
() | | | | 2.4006 | 0.282 |
() | | | | 2.0001 | 0.297 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.2847 | 0.125 |
() | | | | 3.3337 | 0.187 |
() | | | | 3.3027 | 0.171 |
() | | | | 2.2611 | 0.157 |
() | | | | 1.7706 | 0.203 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.2477 | 0.390 |
() | | | | 3.2580 | 0.374 |
() | | | | 3.2322 | 0.297 |
() | | | | 2.7340 | 0.296 |
() | | | | 2.0345 | 0.344 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.3204 | 0.390 |
() | | | | 3.3363 | 0.391 |
() | | | | 3.3231 | 0.359 |
() | | | | 2.4205 | 0.328 |
() | | | | 1.9767 | 0.312 |
| | | | | |
() | | | | 3.2964 | 0.218 |
() | | | | 3.3102 | 0.187 |
() | | | | 3.2930 | 0.234 |
() | | | | 2.5636 | 0.235 |
() | | | | 2.0023 | 0.220 |
Table 5.
Comparison of different methods without memory in terms of Avg_Iter, and CPU time.
Table 5.
Comparison of different methods without memory in terms of Avg_Iter, and CPU time.
Without Memory Methods | Avg_Iter | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
Table 6.
Comparison of different methods with memory in terms of Avg_Iter, and CPU time.
Table 6.
Comparison of different methods with memory in terms of Avg_Iter, and CPU time.
With Memory Methods | Avg_Iter | | CPU Time |
---|
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |
| | | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | 0 | |
() | | | |
() | | | |