Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Real-Time Optimization under Uncertainty Applied to a Gas Lifted Well Network
Previous Article in Journal
Species Coexistence in Nitrifying Chemostats: A Model of Microbial Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Online Optimization Applied to a Shockless Explosion Combustor
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Processes 2016, 4(4), 53;

Model Predictive Control of the Exit Part Temperature for an Austenitization Furnace

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Dominique Bonvin
Received: 9 August 2016 / Revised: 6 December 2016 / Accepted: 6 December 2016 / Published: 15 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Real-Time Optimization)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [584 KB, uploaded 15 December 2016]   |  


Quench hardening is the process of strengthening and hardening ferrous metals and alloys by heating the material to a specific temperature to form austenite (austenitization), followed by rapid cooling (quenching) in water, brine or oil to introduce a hardened phase called martensite. The material is then often tempered to increase toughness, as it may decrease from the quench hardening process. The austenitization process is highly energy-intensive and many of the industrial austenitization furnaces were built and equipped prior to the advent of advanced control strategies and thus use large, sub-optimal amounts of energy. The model computes the energy usage of the furnace and the part temperature profile as a function of time and position within the furnace under temperature feedback control. In this paper, the aforementioned model is used to simulate the furnace for a batch of forty parts under heuristic temperature set points suggested by the operators of the plant. A model predictive control (MPC) system is then developed and deployed to control the the part temperature at the furnace exit thereby preventing the parts from overheating. An energy efficiency gain of 5.3 % was obtained under model predictive control compared to operation under heuristic temperature set points tracked by a regulatory control layer. View Full-Text
Keywords: model predictive control; energy efficiency; iron and steel; austenitization model predictive control; energy efficiency; iron and steel; austenitization

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ganesh, H.S.; Edgar, T.F.; Baldea, M. Model Predictive Control of the Exit Part Temperature for an Austenitization Furnace. Processes 2016, 4, 53.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Processes EISSN 2227-9717 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top