Next Article in Journal
A Two-Account Life Insurance Model for Scenario-Based Valuation Including Event Risk
Next Article in Special Issue
Community Analysis of Global Financial Markets
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Interconnectedness of Financial Conglomerates
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Risks 2015, 3(2), 164-182; doi:10.3390/risks3020164

The Impact of Reinsurance Strategies on Capital Requirements for Premium Risk in Insurance

1,†,* , 1,†
and
2,†
1
Department of Mathematics, Finance and Econometrics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milano, Italy
2
Department of Statistical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milano, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Weidong Tian
Received: 31 March 2015 / Accepted: 26 May 2015 / Published: 3 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Collection Systemic Risk and Reinsurance)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1065 KB, uploaded 3 June 2015]   |  

Abstract

New risk-based solvency requirements for insurance companies across European markets have been introduced by Solvency II and will come in force from 1 January 2016. These requirements, derived by a Standard Formula or an Internal Model, will be by far more risk-sensitive than the required solvency margin provided by the current legislation. In this regard, a Partial Internal Model for Premium Risk is developed here for a multi-line Non-Life insurer. We follow a classical approach based on a Collective Risk Model properly extended in order to consider not only the volatility of aggregate claim amounts but also expense volatility. To measure the effect of risk mitigation, suitable reinsurance strategies are pursued. We analyze how naïve coverage as conventional Quota Share and Excess of Loss reinsurance may modify the exact moments of the distribution of technical results. Furthermore, we investigate how alternative choices of commission rates in proportional treaties may affect the variability of distribution. Numerical results are also figured out in the last part of the paper with evidence of different effects for small and large companies. The main reasons for these differences are pointed out. View Full-Text
Keywords: capital requirement for premium risk; collective risk model; reinsurance strategies; Solvency II capital requirement for premium risk; collective risk model; reinsurance strategies; Solvency II
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Clemente, G.P.; Savelli, N.; Zappa, D. The Impact of Reinsurance Strategies on Capital Requirements for Premium Risk in Insurance. Risks 2015, 3, 164-182.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Risks EISSN 2227-9091 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top