Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Growth of Zygophyllum dumosum Boiss.: Summer Dormancy Is Associated with Loss of the Permissive Epigenetic Marker Dimethyl H3K4 and Extensive Reduction in Proteins Involved in Basic Cell Functions
Next Article in Special Issue
The CLV-WUS Stem Cell Signaling Pathway: A Roadmap to Crop Yield Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Biochar Remediation Improves the Leaf Mineral Composition of Telfairia occidentalis Grown on Gas Flared Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Rye Genes Responsible for Abnormal Development of Wheat–Rye Hybrids Are Linked in the Vicinity of an Evolutionary Translocation on Chromosome 6R
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inheritance and Genetic Mapping of the Reduced Height (Rht18) Gene in Wheat

1
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University—Pullman, 277 Johnson Hall, PO Box 646420, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA
2
USDA-ARS Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Rd., Riverside, CA 92507, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2018, 7(3), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030058
Submission received: 12 June 2018 / Revised: 3 July 2018 / Accepted: 11 July 2018 / Published: 15 July 2018

Abstract

:
Short-statured plants revolutionized agriculture during the 1960s due to their ability to resist lodging, increased their response to fertilizers, and improved partitioning of assimilates which led to yield gains. Of more than 21 reduced-height (Rht) genes reported in wheat, only three—Rht-B1b, Rht-D1b, and Rht8—were extensively used in wheat breeding programs. The remaining reduced height mutants have not been utilized in breeding programs due to the lack of characterization. In the present study, we determined the inheritance of Rht18 and developed a genetic linkage map of the region containing Rht18. The height distribution of the F2 population was skewed towards the mutant parent, indicating that the dwarf allele (Rht18) is semi-dominant over the tall allele (rht18). Rht18 was mapped on chromosome 6A between markers barc146 and cfd190 with a genetic distance of 26.2 and 17.3 cM, respectively. In addition to plant height, agronomically important traits, like awns and tiller numbers, were also studied in the bi-parental population. Although the average tiller number was very similar in both parents, the F2 population displayed a normal distribution for tiller number with the majority of plants having phenotype similar to the parents. Transgressive segregation was observed for plant height and tiller number in F2 population. This study enabled us to select a semi-dwarf line with superior agronomic characteristics that could be utilized in a breeding program. The identification of SSRs associated with Rht18 may improve breeders’ effectiveness in selecting desired semi-dwarf lines for developing new wheat cultivars.

1. Introduction

The Green Revolution, in the mid-twentieth century, brought about advancements in agriculture that are still in practice to date. The introduction of semi-dwarf varieties that are more responsive to changing agriculture practices like response to fertilizers was pivotal in bringing the green revolution by increasing cereal production to meet the population demands particularly in developing countries like China, India, Brazil, and Egypt [1]. Two genotypes, Norin10 {Rht1 (Rht-B1b) and Rht2 (Rht-D1b)} and Akakomugi (Rht8), were first incorporated into breeding programs to introduce the semi-dwarf genes in wheat cultivars in the United States and Italy [2,3].
The development of semi-dwarf cultivars can be attributed to a shorter yet stronger culm that accommodates high yields and prevents lodging [4,5]. Of the 21 wheat mutants reported to be associated with height reduction, only Rht-B1b and/or Rht-D1b, Rht8 and Rht12 have been characterized in detail [6,7]. Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 are two homoeologous genes present on B and D genomes in hexaploid wheat that code for DELLA proteins, which suppress gibberellin (GA)-responsive growth [8]. Normally, GA regulates binding of the GA insensitive dwarf 1 (GID1) receptor protein with DELLA proteins and promotes their degradation. Mutant alleles, Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b, produce DELLA proteins that do not bind GID1 resulting in growth inhibition due to insensitivity to GA [8]. Similarly, modulation in GA synthesis or signaling is known to be involved in reducing plant height in different species. Studies in Arabidopsis, maize [6], rice [9,10], and barley [11], suggest that GA affects the inter-nodal elongation and thus alters plant height.
Height reduction in present day cultivars of wheat is achieved mainly by Rht-B1b and/or Rht-D1b, accounting for ~95% of the cultivated wheat around the world [2]. Of the other 19 height mutants reported in wheat, only Rht8 has been used in some European wheat cultivars. The rest have not been utilized either because of the lack of genetic characterization or mapping information. The limited genetic variability in semi-dwarf lines used in breeding programs is becoming a bottleneck for further wheat improvement, due to the association of some negative effects with the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b genes, particularly under abiotic stresses or changing environmental conditions [12]. Currently used semi-dwarf wheat lines are defective from the perspective of GA, which plays an important role in the growth and development of the plant. These genotypes display a significant effect on early seedling growth. Specifically, coleoptile length, first leaf elongation, seedling emergence, and plant height reduction have been reported in the genotypes carrying Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b compared to tall parents [6,13]. The GA-responsive Rht12 and Rht13 were reported to reduce plant height with no adverse effect on the coleoptile and root trait during the seedling stage [14,15]. Rht12 delayed ear emergence, reducing flag leaf length and grain size, while Rht13 adversely affected the 1000 kernel weight and flag leaf length. Initially classified as GA-responsive, Rht8 was reported to be involved in reduced sensitivity to brassinosteroids that resulted in reducing plant height [16]. The 17 other reduced-height mutants have not been fully characterized. Rht18 was found to be GA-sensitive and was identified as a possible reduced height mutant candidate for future breeding programs [4,17]. In durum wheat, Rht18 was previously mapped to the short arm of chromosome 6A at the same locus as Rht14 and Rht16 [17,18]. Applications of exogenous gibberellins (GA3) restored plant height and other agronomic traits of Rht18 dwarf lines to the wild-type levels, indicating that Rht18 dwarf mutants are impaired in GA biosynthesis [19]. In this investigation, we have mapped Rht18 to chromosome 6A using a cross between a pre-green revolution tall line (Indian) devoid of any know height reducing genes and Rht18 mutant Icaro. The transfer of the Rht18 allele into bread wheat and the selection of potential semi-dwarf lines with good agronomic characteristics can be useful for wheat breeding programs.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Plant Height of F2 and F2:3 Progenies

The plant height of the F2 population was recorded under controlled environmental conditions in a greenhouse along with parental lines Indian and Icaro. The height of the tall parent Indian and dwarf mutant parent Icaro averaged 86 ± 2.82 cm (Mean ± S.E.) and 44 ± 1.02 cm (Mean ± S.E.), respectively (Figure 1). Of the 94 F2 plants, approximately 55 were within 10 cm of the Icaro height range. Only four of the plants in the F2 population had a phenotype similar to Indian (86 ± 10 cm). Three of the originally-sown plants did not grow to maturity. This is expected as sterility is often associated with the incompatibility among the tetraploid and hexaploid crosses [20,21]. The F2 population had a height distribution skewed towards the parent Icaro (Figure 1). The skewed distribution towards reduced height parents was also reported in the Rht3 F2 mapping population [22]. This distribution suggests that the mutant phenotype is dominant, as only a few plants had the tall phenotype. Interestingly, a few F2 plants were taller than the tall parent and many were shorter than the dwarf parent. The height distribution pattern suggests that additional modifier genes might be involved in regulating plant height. Plant height is known to be a complex trait regulated by interaction and interplay among major and minor genes [23]. The transgressive segregation observed for plant height might be due to epistatic gene actions [23]. Transgressive segregation was reported earlier in wheat for several agronomic traits, including plant height [24], grain yield and its components [25], heading date, and vernalization requirement [26]. In a previous study involving Rht8, transgressive segregants were observed for longer peduncles and grains per spike with no significant change in spike length, spikelet number, or number of fertile tillers [27]. Additionally, no significant effect was observed on roots, while a slight decrease in coleoptile length occurred. Partitioning of dry matter to ears was increased at anthesis, however, dry weight of stems and above-ground biomass, including ears, decreased [27].
Forty seeds from each individual F2 plant representing the F2:3 progenies were sown in the field the following summer to evaluate the genotypes of the F2 plants, as it was difficult to classify plants into distinct categories in F2. The F2:3 population showed segregation for plant height (Figure 2), with 14 progenies classified as homozygous short, one as homozygous tall, and 54 were classified as heterozygous. Highly significant effects were found for the plant height (Table 1). For the F2:3 population the height was found to be on average taller than the F2, possibly due to the photoperiod effect in the field. As seen in the F2 generation, we observed some very dwarf and some very tall plants in F2:3 progenies (Figure 2), indicating the role of additional modifier genes in transgressive segregation.

2.2. Spike Morphology

Along with the plant height, the F2 population also segregated for awn-less/short or long, black awns. Among the parents, Indian spikes were awn-less and Icaro spikes bear long black awns (Figure 3). Among the F2 plants, 55 plants had awns and 36 plants were awn-less. We have also observed a difference in spike morphology among the F2 and F2:3 plants (Figure 3). The Indian spike is long and had loose spikelets, while the Icaro head is small with compact spikelets (Figure 3). We have observed plants with Indian-type heads with awns and Icaro-type heads without awns (Figure 3).

2.3. Tiller Number

The F2 population displayed a range for the number of tillers per plant ranging from three tillers per plant to 28 tillers per plant (Figure 4). Fifty-five percent of plants have tiller numbers ranging from 9 to 15 per plant, resembling the average for both Indian and Icaro, which were approximately 11 and 12 tillers per plant, respectively. The highest tillering plants were usually dwarf and sterile or contained only a few seeds in a spike. This might be due to incompatibility between the two genotypes. The higher or lower number of tillers compared to the average of both the parents might be due to multigenic nature of the trait. Extreme dwarf plants were sterile and did not set seeds. Further, of the 91 F2 lines used for F2:3 field evaluation, only 75 plants produced seed. This is expected for a hexaploid and tetraploid cross due to pollen viability issues restricting the seed set [28]. Among the plants that set seeds, some had good seed sets while others only contributed a few per plant.
The variation observed in spike morphology was not associated with the height phenotype each plant displayed (data not shown). The seed weight did not correlate with plant height. Tiller number in F2 plants did not associate with the seed weight or number of seeds harvested at maturity (data not shown). The 100 seed weight for Indian and Icaro were 3.43 g and 3.69 g, respectively. Among the F2:3 families, the short families had an average 100 seed weight of 2.8 g while the tall families had 3.1 g. The height mutation in wheat is reported to have affected the seed weight compared to the tall counterpart. Of the studied reduced height mutants, Rht12 reduces the grain weight more compared to Rht-B1b, Rht-B1c, and Rht8 [29]. The reduction in grain weight might be due to the adverse effect of Rht18 on grain size [27,30]. In fields conditions, the tiller number per plant was difficult to measure, hence, was not recorded for the F2:3 plants. The F2:3 families were also evaluated in the field for their agronomic characteristics to identify the agronomically important plant to be utilized in hexaploid wheat breeding. We have selected one line (line 29) based on plant height, stem strength, and spike morphology. More detailed agronomic and molecular analysis will be performed on the selected line to determine its suitability for utilization in a breeding program.

2.4. Genetic Mapping of Rht18

In order to map the gene on a wheat chromosome, over 700 SSR markers [31] were used to screen parents Indian and Icaro. Of these, 154 markers showed polymorphism between the parents and were used to genotype the population. The Rht18 gene was mapped to the short arm of chromosome 6A and was flanked by barc146 and cfd190 (Figure 5). The SSR marker cfd190 was placed at a distance of 17.3 cM away from Rht18. Previously, barc003, a marker from the short arm of the chromosome 6A, was mapped 25.1 cM away from Rht18 in durum wheat [17,32]. Earlier, Rht18 was mapped on chromosome 6A between barc118 and IWA4371 using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) in durum wheat [18]. The mapping location of Rht18 in our study is consistent with the previous map position [17,18]. Recently, several independent single nucleotide variants in the GA2oxA9 gene located on chromosome 6A were associated with the Rht18 mutant phenotype [33]. GS20xA9 is predicted to encode GA 2-oxidase, which reduces the amount of bioactive GA (GA1).
Reduced-height genes in wheat have been imperative to the agronomic success of the crop. The resulting yield increases have been credited to the improved structure of the plant that responded better to the agronomic practices in use today. The semi-dwarf phenotype increases resistance to lodging along with increasing the number of grains per plants. Incorporating additional reduced-height genes into breeding programs could help contribute to the diversification of the genotype. Considering climate change and the demand for food security, incorporating additional dwarfing genes into the germplasm and evaluating their agronomic worth might help to address the wheat productivity under a changing climate. As the photoperiod and the background of a genotype affect height, a marker close to the gene may assist in easy and precise selection of the locus. Thus, identification of SSR markers closer to the Rht18 locus may assist breeders in early identification of dwarfing lines for breeding populations. Further, conducting the genomic and agronomic characterization of this mutant gene may become instrumental in developing a better dwarfing system in wheat. Additionally, we have identified a semi-dwarf line from F2:3 families with superior agronomic characters that might have potential to be used in wheat breeding to incorporate the gene into the hexaploid background of Pacific Northwest region.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials

The dwarf parent, Icaro (tetraploid; 4×) (Rht18; PI 503555), was originally derived in 1987 in Italy from fast-neutron treatment of cv. Anhinga (PI 428455). The tall line Indian (hexaploid; 6×) (CI 4489), was developed at the University of Idaho, Idaho before 1915. As the tall parent is released before the introduction of reduced height genes, we presumed that cv. Indian would be devoid of the Rht18 allele in the background. Both the germplasms were procured from GRIN [34].

3.2. F1 and Plant Growing Conditions

The F1 produced by crossing Indian as the female parent and Icaro as the male parent was self-pollinated, and 120 F2 seeds were collected. The F2 mapping population was grown at the plant growth facility, Washington State University, under controlled conditions of 16 h days (22 °C) and 8 h (18 °C) nights. For ease of genotyping, 94 randomly-selected F2 plants were selected for further analysis. Forty seeds of each F2 plant were grown in three-foot rows at the Spillman Agronomy Farm, Pullman, WA for phenotypic screening. Four rows were planted in each plot with a row-to-row and plot-to-plot spacing of one foot. Each row represented progeny of a single F2 plant. The seeds were planted mechanically using four planter drills and the plants were grown until maturity using the standard regional agricultural practices with no irrigation.

3.3. Phenotypic Screening

The phenotypic data for height, awns, tiller number, and seed weight was collected for the F2 and F2:3 populations. The plant height was recorded at maturity to the nearest cm excluding the awns. The population was characterized into tall, intermediate, and dwarf based on the plant height at maturity. Tiller numbers were counted manually per plant and seed weight was measured for each individual plant.

3.4. DNA Isolation and Genotyping

Young leaf tissue of F2 plants was collected in 96-well DNA extraction plates. Four, 2-cm long leaf segments were clipped and lyophilize for three days. The lyophilized tissue was used for DNA isolation using a modified SDS extraction method [35]. The DNA was diluted to a final concentration of 25 ng/µL. Primer sequence information for simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were obtained from GrainGenes website [36].
Over 700 SSR markers were first screened for polymorphism between the parental genotypes. The PCR was performed in 12 µL reaction volume containing 1× NEB reaction buffer, 200 µM of dNTPs, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05 µM forward primer, 0.25 µM reverse primer, 0.2 µM M13 forward-labeled primer, and 1U homemade Taq polymerase. For multiplexing, the M13 sequence was fluorescently labeled separately with FAM, HEX, NED, and PET dyes. The amplification of SSR loci was performed using the protocol consisted of 94 °C/4 min for initial denaturation, followed by 37 cycles (94 °C/30 s, 60 °C/45 s, 72 °C/60 s), with final extension at 72 °C/10 min. The amplification products were separated using ABI DNA analyzer 3100 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Alleles were sized relative to internal size standard (cassual445 labeled with Dy630) using GeneMarker software (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA). MapMaker 2.0 was used to construct the genetic linkage map using the Kosambi mapping function [37,38].

Author Contributions

N.P.G., A.M. and D.S. carried out the research study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. N.P.G. and A.M. collected the phenotypic data. K.S.G., D.S. and A.M. conceived and designed the study. Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Financial assistance from NSF BREAD-0965533 to support Nathan Grant’s undergraduate research and for conducting the experiment is acknowledged.

Acknowledgments

We thank Deven R. See and the Western Regional Small Grains Genotyping Laboratory (WRSGGL), Pullman, WA, for providing the genotyping facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

References

  1. Germplasm Resources Information Network. Available online: https://www.ars-grin.gov/ (accessed on 12 July 2018).
  2. Hedden, P. The genes of the Green Revolution. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Borojevic, K.; Borojevic, K. The transfer and history of “reduced height genes” (Rht) in wheat from Japan to Europe. J. Hered. 2005, 96, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ellis, M.H.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Chandler, P.; Bonnett, D.; Spielmeyer, W.; Richards, R.A. The effect of different height reducing genes on the early growth of wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 2004, 31, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chapman, S.C.; Mathews, K.L.; Trethowan, R.M.; Singh, R.P. Relationships between height and yield in near-isogenic spring wheats that contrast for major reduced height genes. Euphytica 2007, 157, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peng, J.; Richards, D.E.; Hartley, N.M.; Murphy, G.P.; Devos, K.M.; Flintham, J.E.; Beales, J.; Fish, L.J.; Worland, A.J.; Pelica, F.; et al. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 1999, 400, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ellis, M.H.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Azanza, F.; Richards, R.A.; Spielmeyer, W. Molecular mapping of gibberellin-responsive dwarfing genes in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pearce, S.; Saville, R.; Vaughan, S.P.; Chandler, P.M.; Wilhelm, E.P.; Sparks, C.A.; Al-Kaff, N.; Korolev, A.; Boulton, M.I.; Phillips, A.L.; et al. Molecular characterization of Rht-1 dwarfing genes in hexaploid wheat. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1820–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ogawa, M.; Kusano, T.; Katsumi, M.; Sano, H. Rice gibberellin-insensitive gene homolog, OsGAI, encodes a nuclear-localized protein capable of gene activation at transcriptional level. Gene 2000, 245, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ikeda, A.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Sonoda, Y.; Kitano, H.; Koshioka, M.; Futsuhara, Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Yamaguchi, J. Slender rice, a constitutive gibberellin response mutant, is caused by a null mutation of the SLR1 gene, an ortholog of the height-regulating gene GAI/RGA/RHT/D8. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chandler, P.M.; Marion-Poll, A.; Ellis, M.; Gubler, F. Mutants at the Slender1 locus of barley cv Himalaya. Molecular and physiological characterization. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tolmay, V.L. Resistance to biotic and abiotic stress in the Triticeae. Hereditas 2001, 135, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schillinger, W.F.; Donaldson, E.; Allan, R.E.; Jones, S.S. Winter wheat seedling emergence from deep sowing depths. Agron. J. 1998, 90, 582–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, L.; Phillips, A.L.; Condon, A.G.; Parry, M.A.; Hu, Y.G. GA-responsive dwarfing gene Rht12 affects the developmental and agronomic traits in common bread wheat. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Du, Y.; Yang, Z.; Condon, A.G.; Hu, Y.-G. Genetic effect of dwarfing gene Rht13 compared with Rht-D1b on plant height and some agronomic traits in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Res. 2014, 162, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gasperini, D.; Greenland, A.; Hedden, P.; Dreos, R.; Harwood, W.; Griffiths, S. Genetic and physiological analysis of Rht8 in bread wheat: An alternative source of semi-dwarfism with a reduced sensitivity to brassinosteroids. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4419–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Watanabe, N. Genetic collection and development of near-isogenic lines in durum wheat. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2008, 12, 636–643. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vikhe, P.; Patil, R.; Chavan, A.; Oak, M.; Tamhankar, S. Mapping gibberellin-sensitive dwarfing locus Rht18 in durum wheat and development of SSR and SNP markers for selection in breeding. Mol. Breed. 2017, 37, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Du, Y.Y.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y.F.; Hu, Y.G. Dwarfing gene Rht18 from tetraploid wheat responds to exogenous GA3 in hexaploid wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2017, 45, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Padmanaban, S.; Zhang, P.; Hare, R.A.; Sutherland, M.W.; Martin, A. Pentaploid wheat hybrids: Applications, characterisation, and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Martin, A.; Simpfendorfer, S.; Hare, R.A.; Eberhard, F.S.; Sutherland, M.W. Retention of D genome chromosomes in pentaploid wheat crosses. Heredity 2011, 107, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Navarro, C.; Yang, Y.; Mohan, A.; Grant, N.; Gill, K.S.; Sandhu, D. Microsatellites based genetic linkage map of the Rht3 locus in bread wheat. Mol. Plant Breed. 2014, 5, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rieseberg, L.H.; Archer, M.A.; Wayne, R.K. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 1999, 83, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bhatt, G.M. Inheritance of heading date, plant height, and kernel weight in two spring wheat Crosses. Crop Sci. 1972, 12, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. El-Hennawy, M.A.; Abdalla, A.F.; Shafey, S.A.; Al-Ashkar, I.M. Production of doubled haploid wheat lines (Triticum aestivum L.) using anther culture technique. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2011, 56, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shindo, C.; Tsujimoto, H.; Sasakuma, T. Segregation analysis of heading traits in hexaploid wheat utilizing recombinant inbred lines. Heredity 2003, 90, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, Z.; Zheng, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Condon, A.G.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.-G. Effects of the GA-responsive dwarfing gene Rht18 from tetraploid wheat on agronomic traits of common wheat. Field Crops Res. 2015, 183, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhagyalakshmi, K.; Vinod, K.K.; Kumar, M.; Arumugachamy, S.; Prabhakaran, A.; Raveendran, T.S. Interspecific hybrids from wild x cultivated Triticum crosses-a study on the cytological behavior and molecular relations. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 11, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  29. Casebow, R.; Hadley, C.; Uppal, R.; Addisu, M.; Loddo, S.; Kowalski, A.; Griffiths, S.; Gooding, M. Reduced height (Rht) alleles affect wheat grain quality. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Tang, T. Physiological and Genetic Studies of an Alternative Semi-Dwarfing Gene Rht18 in Wheat; University of Tasmania: Tasmania, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Somers, D.J.; Isaac, P.; Edwards, K. A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Haque, M.A.; Martinek, P.; Watanabe, N.; Kuboyama, T. Genetic mapping of gibberellic acid-sensitive genes for semi-dwarfism in durum wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2011, 39, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ford, B.; Foo, E.; Sharwood, R.E.; Karafiatova, M.; Vrána, J.; MacMillan, C.; Nichols, D.S.; Steuernagel, B.; Uauy, C.; Doležel, J.; et al. Rht18 semi-dwarfism in wheat is due to increased expression of GA 2-oxidaseA9 and lower GA Content. Plant Physiol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gerritsen, V.B. All things dwarfed and beautiful. Available online: https://web.expasy.org/spotlight/pdf/sptlt070.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2018).
  35. Sandhu, D.; Champoux, J.A.; Bondareva, S.N.; Gill, K.S. Identification and physical localization of useful genes and markers to a major gene-rich region on wheat group 1S chromosomes. Genetics 2001, 157, 1735–1747. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. GrainGenes. Available online: https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/GG3/browse.cgi?class=marker;begin=8251 (accessed on 12 July 2018).
  37. Lander, E.S.; Green, P.; Abrahamson, J.; Barlow, A.; Daly, M.J.; Lincoln, S.E.; Newburg, L. MAPMAKER: An interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1987, 1, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kosambi, D.D. The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 1944, 12, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Height distribution in the F2 population. Plant height was grouped into 10 cm series. The star represents plant height of tall or dwarf mutant parent. The average plant height of Indian is recorded 86 cm (from eight plants) and Icaro as 44 cm (from six plants).
Figure 1. Height distribution in the F2 population. Plant height was grouped into 10 cm series. The star represents plant height of tall or dwarf mutant parent. The average plant height of Indian is recorded 86 cm (from eight plants) and Icaro as 44 cm (from six plants).
Plants 07 00058 g001
Figure 2. Plant height distribution among F2:3 families. (A) Indian and Icaro; and (BH) different F2:3 families.
Figure 2. Plant height distribution among F2:3 families. (A) Indian and Icaro; and (BH) different F2:3 families.
Plants 07 00058 g002
Figure 3. Spike morphology of parents and F2:3 families in the mapping population. (A) Indian; (B) Icaro; and (CH) different F2:3 progenies.
Figure 3. Spike morphology of parents and F2:3 families in the mapping population. (A) Indian; (B) Icaro; and (CH) different F2:3 progenies.
Plants 07 00058 g003
Figure 4. Tiller number distribution in the F2 population. The average number of tillers for parents Indian and Icaro were 11 and 12, respectively.
Figure 4. Tiller number distribution in the F2 population. The average number of tillers for parents Indian and Icaro were 11 and 12, respectively.
Plants 07 00058 g004
Figure 5. Genetic linkage map showing the position of Rht18 on chromosome 6A. Genetic distances are shown in centiMorgans (cM).
Figure 5. Genetic linkage map showing the position of Rht18 on chromosome 6A. Genetic distances are shown in centiMorgans (cM).
Plants 07 00058 g005
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of plant height for the F2:3 population.
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of plant height for the F2:3 population.
SourceDFSSMSF ValuePr > F
Model76155,138.42041.2914.49<0.0001
Error6489131.879140.91
Corrected total724246,452.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grant, N.P.; Mohan, A.; Sandhu, D.; Gill, K.S. Inheritance and Genetic Mapping of the Reduced Height (Rht18) Gene in Wheat. Plants 2018, 7, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030058

AMA Style

Grant NP, Mohan A, Sandhu D, Gill KS. Inheritance and Genetic Mapping of the Reduced Height (Rht18) Gene in Wheat. Plants. 2018; 7(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grant, Nathan P., Amita Mohan, Devinder Sandhu, and Kulvinder S. Gill. 2018. "Inheritance and Genetic Mapping of the Reduced Height (Rht18) Gene in Wheat" Plants 7, no. 3: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7030058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop