Next Article in Journal
Hedgehog Signaling in Endochondral Ossification
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue on HOX Genes in Development
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Developmental Mechanism of Limb Field Specification along the Anterior–Posterior Axis during Vertebrate Evolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JDB
Volume 4
Issue 2
10.3390/jdb4020019
jdb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulation of Silk Genes by Hox and Homeodomain Proteins in the Terminal Differentiated Silk Gland of the Silkworm Bombyx mori

by
Shigeharu Takiya
1,2,*,
Takuya Tsubota
3 and
Mai Kimoto
2
1
Shigeharu Takiya, Division of Biological Sciences and Center for Genome Dynamics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, North 10, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan
2
Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, North 10, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
3
Transgenic Silkworm Research Unit, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb4020019
Submission received: 29 February 2016 / Revised: 8 May 2016 / Accepted: 17 May 2016 / Published: 25 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hox Genes and Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The silk gland of the silkworm Bombyx mori is a long tubular organ that is divided into several subparts along its anteroposterior (AP) axis. As a trait of terminal differentiation of the silk gland, several silk protein genes are expressed with unique regional specificities. Most of the Hox and some of the homeobox genes are also expressed in the differentiated silk gland with regional specificities. The expression patterns of Hox genes in the silk gland roughly correspond to those in embryogenesis showing “colinearity”. The central Hox class protein Antennapedia (Antp) directly regulates the expression of several middle silk gland–specific silk genes, whereas the Lin-1/Isl-1/Mec3 (LIM)-homeodomain transcriptional factor Arrowhead (Awh) regulates the expression of posterior silk gland–specific genes for silk fiber proteins. We summarize our results and discuss the usefulness of the silk gland of Bombyx mori for analyzing the function of Hox genes. Further analyses of the regulatory mechanisms underlying the region-specific expression of silk genes will provide novel insights into the molecular bases for target-gene selection and regulation by Hox and homeodomain proteins.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The pioneering genetic studies on homeotic mutations in the silkworm Bombyx mori, which change the identity of the larval thoracic segments and abdominal segments, were mostly carried out in the first half of the 20th century [1,2,3] and therein. More than 30 homeotic mutations in Nc and E loci have been described in these studies. Hox genes responsible for some of these homeotic mutations, and those corresponding to the genes in the Antennapedia (Antp) complex and bithorax complex of Drosophila, were subsequently mapped in the Bombyx genome structure [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Hox genes are well-known master regulators for determining regional identities along the anteroposterior (AP) axis in most multicellular animals [12,13,14,15]. Hox genes encode transcriptional factors, are expressed in different but often overlapping regions along the AP axis during embryogenesis, and regulate different sets of target genes, leading to a different identity of each region in animal bodies. However, the 60-amino-acid-long DNA-binding domains near the C-terminus of Hox proteins, termed homeodomains, are highly conserved and commonly bind to similar adenine (A) and thymine (T)-rich DNA stretches containing the ATTA core, at least in vitro [16,17,18,19,20]. This discrepancy is referred to as the “Hox paradox” [21,22,23]. The coordination of Hox proteins with another class of homeodomain proteins, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx and Homothorax (Hth)/Meis, increases their DNA-binding specificities [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, these complexes still retain the ability to bind to divergent sequence elements [21,31]. Although genome-wide approaches using microarray or chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) technologies have identified large numbers of Hox downstream gene candidates [23,32,33,34,35], the molecular mechanisms by which Hox proteins select and regulate these candidates have not been analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the mechanisms of those leading to functional differences in a Hox protein on target genes also have not been elucidated. Hox proteins can sometimes activate a set of target genes and otherwise repress another set of target genes. Various mechanisms including cofactor-mediated and cofactor-independent DNA-binding steps in addition to DNA-binding-independent steps appear to be involved in the functional regulation of Hox proteins [28,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. The identification of more target genes and their regulatory elements that are actually recognized by Hox proteins will be useful for understanding more clearly the molecular bases underlying the in vivo functions of Hox proteins. We previously reported that the regional specific expression of silk protein genes in the fully differentiated silk gland of the silkworm Bombyx mori was directly regulated by several homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors including the Hox protein Antp, and identified their regulatory elements recognized by these homeodomain proteins [46,47,48,49,50,51].
Larvae of the silkworm Bombyx mori possess a pair of silk glands. The silk gland is a long tubular organ consisting of a single cell layer of approximately 1000 substantially large, polyploidy cells. Silk gland placodes are induced in the ectoderm of the labial segment by Sex comb reduced (Scr) during embryogenesis, and the expression of Scr disappears from the invaginating silk gland with the fork head (fkh) and POU-M1 genes being expressed there instead [52,53,54,55]. The expression of the fibroin-heavy-chain gene (fibH) is detectable immediately after the completion of silk gland development at around stage 25 of embryogenesis [56]. Silk glands in the silkworm extend from a spinneret on the head to the seventh abdominal segment, and are divided into several subparts along the AP axis (Figure 1) [57,58,59,60,61,62]. Silk fiber proteins are produced in the posterior silk gland (PSG), secreted into the lumen, and then transferred to the middle silk gland (MSG). Several glue proteins are produced in the MSG, secreted into the lumen, and then coat silk fiber proteins. Silk proteins are transferred forward through the cuticle-lined anterior part of the silk gland (ASG), and are spun as silk threads from the spinneret. The MSG is further divided into three subparts: the anterior (MSG-A), middle (MSG-M) and posterior (MSG-P) portions, based on natural turns and their functions [46,47,51,55,57,59,62,63].
Although the silkworms produce a large amount of silk proteins at the end of the last instar to make cocoons, a certain amount of silk proteins is produced constantly from the first instar, except during the molting stages, possibly to keep the larvae stable on mulberry leaves and other substrata. Therefore, the expression of silk protein genes is repeatedly turned on and off in a manner depending on the larval molting cycles [56,58,64,65,66,67]. The mechanisms of this stage-specific expression involve temporal-specific regulation of the activity of Hox and homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors by the insect hormones ecdysone and juvenile hormone, regardless of whether directly or indirectly. We herein describe and discuss the roles of Hox and other homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors in regulating the region-specific expression of silk genes in the terminally differentiated silk gland at the last instar.

2. Region-Specific Expression of Silk Genes in the Silk Gland

The fibroin-heavy-chain (fibH), fibroin-light-chain (fibL) and fibrohexamerin (fhx) genes for silk fiber proteins are expressed specifically in PSG cells (Table 1) [64,67,68,69,70]. Silk fiber proteins are assembled into a large elementary unit consisting of Fib-H, Fib-L and Fhx in a 6:6:1 molecular ratio [71], and are then secreted into the lumen. In contrast, the sericin-1 (ser1), sericin-2 (ser2) and sericin-3 (ser3) genes for glue proteins are expressed in MSG cells with sublocal specificities (Table 1) [46,47,51,55,57,59,62,63]. ser1 is expressed in the MSG-M and MSG-P at the last instar, ser2 is mainly expressed in the MSG-A, and ser3 is expressed in the MSG-A and MSG-M. ser1 mRNAs are differentially spliced depending on the larval stages and the subparts of the MSG, and several isotypes of Ser1 proteins are produced [47,57,72]. ser2 mRNAs are also differentially spliced [57,62]. In addition to these silk genes, Tsubota et al. [51] recently found that other silk genes, fibrohexamerin-like 4 and 5 (fhxh4 and 5), are specifically expressed in the MSG-M and MSG-P as ser1. Fhxh4 and Fhxh5 were previously identified as abundant proteins in cocoons [73]. Thus, the expression of silk protein genes is regulated strictly in region-specific manners in the silk gland of Bombyx mori.

3. Region-Specific Expression of Hox and Several Homeobox Genes in the Fully Differentiated Silk Gland

Similar to the silk protein genes, Hox and several homeobox genes are known to be expressed with sublocal specificities along the AP axis of the silk gland (Table 1) [6,46,47,55,74,75,76]. The anterior Hox genes labial (lab) and Scr are mainly expressed in the ASG, whereas the expression of central Hox genes such as Antp, Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and abdominal-A (abd-A) is absent in the ASG [47]. Antp was previously found to be expressed in the MSG, and abd-A was expressed in the MSG and PSG. The expression level of Ubx was very low, at least at the last instar, but the RT-PCR products were barely detected in the MSG-P and PSG. The posterior Hox gene Abdominal-B (Abd-B) was shown to be expressed in the ASG and posterior half of the PSG [47]. Although we have not yet detected the structural border within the PSG, it may be divided into subparts with different functions. The segment polarity gene engrailed (en) and its paralogue invected (in) are strongly expressed in the ASG and posterior portions of the MSG [47,74,76]. The Pit/Oct/Unc-86 (POU)-homeodomain protein gene POU-M1 is also strongly expressed in the ASG and MSG-A [46,54]. The Arrowhead gene (Awh), which codes a transcriptional factor belonging to the Lin-1/Isl-1/Mec3 (LIM)-homeodomain family, was shown to be expressed specifically in the PSG [48,49]. Expression of the maternal homeobox gene in Drosophila embryogenesis, caudal (cad), was detected in ASG and MSG. These Hox and homeobox genes have been expected to serve in the regional specificity of the silk gland and the region-specific expression of silk protein genes.

4. Antp Regulates the MSG-Specific Expression of ser1

The expression of ser1 is restricted to the MSG-M and MSG-P in the last instar [46,47,55]. We attempted to identify the promoter elements responsible for the region-specific expression of ser1. By using a gene gun, reporter constructs containing the ser1 promoter were introduced into silk glands dissected out from the last instar larvae, and silk glands were then transplanted into other silkworms at the same stage. After being cultivated for one or two days, the transplanted silk glands were removed from the recipient larvae, and the promoter activity of each construct was assessed. We found that the −70 region of the ser1 promoter (the transcription start site is denoted +1) was essential for its MSG-specific expression [50]. A protein factor or factor complex binding to the −70 element was detected in extracts prepared from the intermolt MSG-P using the electrophoretic mobility sift assay (EMSA), but not in extracts from the PSG or MSG-P at the molting stage, which is consistent with the spatio-temporal specificity of ser1 expression. This factor was designated as the MSG-intermolt-specific complex (MIC). The MIC also bound regions further upstream (−1350, −320 and −180) of the ser1 promoter, and these MIC-binding elements were found to commonly contain the ATTA-core AT-rich sequences recognized by homeodomain proteins (Table 2) [50].
Since Antp, en and in are specifically expressed in the MSG [47,74,76], we prepared recombinant proteins of Antp and En, and determined whether these proteins bind to the −70 element. Although both proteins bound to the −70 element of the ser1 promoter, Antp but not En showed a similar DNA-binding specificity to that of MIC [47]. The apparent molecular size of the Antp-probe DNA complex detected with EMSA was markedly smaller than that of the MIC-probe complex. Hox proteins are known to make a complex with the TALE class homeodomain proteins extradenticle (Exd) and homothorax (Hth) via the conserved hexapeptide motif that resides on the N-terminal side of the homeodomain of Hox proteins [28,29]. The addition of recombinant Exd and Hth proteins together with Antp into EMSA reactions led to the formation of a MIC-like complex with a similar size to that of MIC. Using antibodies specific to Antp, Exd or Hth in EMSA, we confirmed that the MIC in MSG-P extracts included these Hox and homeodomain proteins [47], though the −70 element of ser1 does not contain apparent binding sequences for Exd or Hth, except the ATTA core commonly recognized by homeodomain proteins. Although a hexapeptide-independent interaction between Exd and several Hox proteins has been reported [88,89], the YPWM motif of Antp appeared to be necessary for the formation of MIC with the cofactors Exd and Hth on the −70 element of the ser1 promoter.
When the recombinant Antp protein was added to extracts from the PSG, the formation of a MIC-like complex was observed via EMSA. In addition, the genes for Exd and Hth were expressed in the PSG as in the MSG. We investigated whether the misexpression of Antp in the PSG induces ectopic expression of ser1. The expression of ser1 was induced in the PSG of transgenic silkworms expressing Antp. When the binding of MIC to the −70 element was disturbed by two-nucleotide mutations, the promoter activity of ser1 was mostly lost [50]. Thus, the central Hox protein Antp is an essential activator of ser1 expressed specifically in the middle portions (MSG-M and MSG-P) of the fully differentiated silk gland of normal silkworms [47], and the activation function of Antp is achieved through binding to the −70 element of ser1 promoter.

5. Antp Activates Other MSG-Specific Silk Genes

Tsubota et al. [51] recently found the novel Antp-induced silk genes fhxh4 and fhxh5. fhxh4 and fhxh5 are specifically expressed in the MSG-M and MSG-P as ser1 in wild-type silkworms, whereas the ectopic expression of these genes was induced in the PSG when Antp was misexpressed in transgenic silkworm lines. The ectopic expression of ser3 in the PSG induced by Antp was also observed. Consensus MIC-binding sequences have been identified in the upstream regions of these genes (Table 2), and the binding of MIC to these elements was confirmed with EMSA, suggesting that these MSG-specific silk genes are direct targets of Antp, similar to ser1 [51]. Antp appears to function as a master regulator for MSG-specific gene expression. The expression of ser3 is restricted to the MSG-A and MSG-M in wild-type silkworms. mRNAs for Antp are detected in the MSG-A, but the Antp protein was not detected with Western blotting, and even with the addition of recombinant Antp into MSG-A extracts, the MIC-like complex was not formed in EMSA [47]. Therefore, the expression of ser3 in the MSG-A appears to be regulated by an Antp-independent mechanism.

6. The LIM-Homeodomain Protein, Arrowhead, Regulates the PSG-Specific Expression of Silk Fiber Protein Genes

Of the PSG-specific silk fiber protein genes, the promoter of fibH has been analyzed in detail using cell-free transcription systems prepared from PSG and other tissues of the silkworm [79,90,91,92,93,94,95,96]. The activity of natural DNA of the fibH promoter obtained from the PSG without cloning technology has also been assessed in cell-free systems [97]. Regulatory elements bound by various transcription factors such as Fork head/silk gland factor-1 (Fkh/SGF-1), silk gland factor-2 (SGF-2), POU-M1/SGF-3 and fibroin-modulator-binding protein-1 (FMBP-1) were detected (Table 2) [78,79,80,84,92,98]. In these studies, the SGF-2-binding elements present from −238 to −73 were found to be essential for efficient transcription of fibH in PSG extracts [78,91,94,95]. Furthermore, Shimizu et al. [77] demonstrated that the combination of two far-upstream enhancer elements with promoter elements is indispensable for the full activation of fibH in vivo using a gene gun system, and an SGF-2-binding sequence at approximately −1620 was a key element in the far-upstream enhancer.
The LIM-homeodomain protein Arrowhead (Awh) was found to be an essential factor regulating PSG-specific expression of fibH, fibL and fhx. SGF-2 was purified from PSG extracts by Ohno et al. [49], and it was shown to be composed of Awh, LIM-domain binding protein (Ldb) and a member of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein family (LIM-homeodomain and Ldb complex associated factor; Lcaf). In transgenic Drosophila, a reporter gene having Bombyx fibH or the fhx promoter are expressed in a restricted region around the imaginal ring of the salivary gland, which resembles the expression region of the Drosophila Awh gene [99,100,101]. The salivary gland of Drosophila develops from the labial segment under the regulation of Scr, as does the Bombyx silk gland; however, the Bombyx salivary gland is derived from the mandibular segment. In Bombyx mori, Awh is expressed in a strictly specific manner in the PSG, but not in the salivary gland in the last instar, whereas Ldb and Lcaf are expressed in most tissues [48,49]. The misexpression of Awh in transgenic silkworms has been shown to induce the ectopic expression of fibH, fibL, and fhx in the MSG, and SGF-2-binding elements have also been detected around the promoter of fibL and fhx (Table 2). We previously reported that the core promoter of fhx itself is an SGF-2-binding element, while the core promoter of fibL has the ability to function as a binding element for both Fkh and FMBP-1. The core promoter of fhx and fibL may act as a tissue-specific regulatory element.
Ldb and Lcaf are expressed in most tissues in last-instar larvae, and the misexpression of Awh was induced in the whole body from a heat-shock promoter in transgenic silkworms. However, the ectopic expression of fibH was induced only in the MSG. Under the same conditions, ectopic expression of fibL and fhx was induced in the ASG in addition to the MSG [48]. The findings suggest that SGF-2 directly regulates the expression of these PSG-specific silk genes, and that coordination with other factors such as Bmsage, which is a silk gland–specific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor interacting with Fkh, may be necessary [102]. The coordination of these transcription factors will be interpreted by the context (i.e., structure) of each promoter. The expressions of fibH and ser1 were not induced in the ASG under the misexpression of Awh and Antp, respectively, and the expression level of fibH in the MSG-P induced by the misexpression of Awh was very low [47,48]. POU-M1, en and in, which are efficiently expressed in these portions, may exert a suppressive function on these genes [46,55,74,76,98,103]. A typical POU-M1-binding element was detected in the promoter of fibH and ser-1 (Table 2), but not around the promoter of fibL and fhx. In Drosophila, En has the ability to recruit the corepressor Groucho and repress target genes [104,105,106]. For example, En suppresses the expression of fkh under coordination with Abd-A in Drosophila.

7. Perspective

We have demonstrated that the homeodomain proteins Antp and Awh are involved in regulating the region-specific expression of silk genes in the silk gland of Bombyx mori by direct binding to the regulatory elements of the silk genes [47,48,49,50,51]. The region-specific regulatory functions of Antp and Awh on the silk genes are achieved through region-specific expression of Antp and Awh. Therefore, it is important to analyze the upstream regulatory mechanisms responsible for the region-specific expression of Antp and Awh. In the silk gland, other Hox and homeobox genes are also expressed with unique regional specificities along the AP axis, and the homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors encoded by these genes may be involved in the cascades regulating the regional specific expression of silk genes. A large number of ATTA core AT-rich elements consist of the consensus sequences recognized by homeodomain proteins in and around the silk genes’ promoters [50,51,78,107,108]. Several AT-rich stretches have also been found around the promoter of Awh (Takiya, unpublished results). Therefore, the silk gland of Bombyx mori is an appropriate system for analyzing how Hox and other homeodomain proteins select and regulate their specific target genes in vivo, in spite of the relative lack of DNA-binding specificity in vitro. This will provide an insight into the mechanisms by which Hox genes determine regional identities along the AP axis of animal bodies.
The expression of Antp mRNA was detectable in the entire MSG, whereas the Antp protein was only found in the MSG-M and MSG-P and was scarcely detectable in the MSG-A with Western blotting [47]. These findings suggest that post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms also restrict the function of Antp in the silk gland. Antp mRNA of Drosophila has an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), and the activity of Antp is regulated not only at the step of transcription, but also at the step of translation. [109]. The translational regulation of some Hox mRNAs is necessary for the normal development of vertebrates [110,111]. Therefore, it is possible that other Hox genes expressed in the silk gland are regulated at translational and/or post-translational steps, as is Antp.
The expression pattern of Hox genes along the AP axis during embryogenesis corresponds to the tandem array on the chromosome and is called “colinearity” [12,112]. Although colinearity is conserved in many animals, the biological significance of maintaining the colinearity during animal evolution remains unclear. Expression levels of Hox genes appear to be affected by the distance from one enhancer, and the distance from the remote enhancer determines the chromatin structure affecting the expression level of each Hox gene [112,113,114]. When Hox genes are expressed in overlapped regions, the more posterior Hox genes tend to govern specificity of the regions. The phenomenon is termed “posterior prevalence”. It is not clear at present whether the mechanisms underlying posterior prevalence play a role in the silk gland. However, Hox genes are expressed in regionally specific, but partly overlapping patterns that roughly correspond to those during embryogenesis. The mechanisms of posterior prevalence may be involved in the differentiation of each part of the silk gland and also in the region-specific expression of silk protein genes.
The silk gland of Bombyx mori is a large and single-cell layered organ, and it is easy to obtain many materials for the preparation of proteins, RNAs and other cell components produced in a region-specific manner. We have the ability to analyze the promoter activities of various constructs transiently in the silk gland and other tissues using a gene gun system [50,77,81,101,115,116]. Technologies to prepare transgenic silkworms and manipulate the genome have been established and are being improved [117,118,119,120,121]. Therefore, the silk gland is an appropriate system to analyze the issues described above both biochemically and genetically. The silkworm Bombyx mori in which Mendel’s law was first confirmed in the animal kingdom [122] is promising to provide novel insight into the molecular basis underlying the regulation of animal body plans by Hox genes.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the members of our laboratories for their support of the research, which led to the main body of information in the present review. Our studies referred in this review were supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) of Japan.

Author Contributions

ST wrote the manuscript. TT and MK read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tazima, Y. The Genetics of the Silkworm; Logos Press: London, UK; Academic Press: London, UK, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  2. Suzuki, Y. Genes that are involved in Bombyx body plan and silk gene regulation. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1994, 38, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ueno, K.; Nagata, T.; Suzuki, Y. Roles of homeotic genes in the Bombyx body plan. In Molecular Model Systems in the Lepidoptera; Goldsmith, M.R., Wilkins, A.S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chai, C.-L.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, F.-F.; Wang, X.-Y.; Yu, Q.-Y.; Liu, B.-B.; Tian, T.; Xia, Q.-Y.; Lu, C.; Xiang, Z.-H. A genomewide survey of homeobox genes and identification of novel structure of the Hox cluster in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Masumoto, M.; Yaginuma, T.; Niimi, T. Functional analysis of Ultrabithorax in the silkworm, Bombyx mori using RNAi. Dev. Genes Evol. 2009, 219, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nagata, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Ueno, K.; Kokubo, H.; Xu, X.; Hui, C.-C.; Hara, W.; Fukuta, M. Developmental expression of the Bombyx Antennapedia homologue and homeotic changes in the Nc mutant. Genes Cells 1996, 1, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pan, M.-H.; Wang, X.-Y.; Chai, C.-L.; Zhang, C.-D.; Lu, C.; Xiang, Z.-H. Identification and function of abdominal-A in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Mol. Biol. 2009, 18, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. The International Silkworm Genome Consortium. The genome of a lepidopteran model insect, the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomita, S.; Kikuchi, A. Abd-B suppresses lepidopteran proleg development in posterior abdomen. Dev. Biol. 2009, 328, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ueno, K.; Hui, C.-C.; Fukuta, M.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular analysis of the deletion mutants in the E homeotic complex of the silkworm Bombyx mori. Development 1992, 114, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Yasukochi, Y.; Ashakumary, L.A.; Wu, C.; Yoshido, A.; Nohata, J.; Mita, K.; Sahara, K. Organization of the Hox gene cluster of the silkworm, Bombyx mori: A split of the Hox cluster in a non-Drosophila insect. Dev. Genes Evol. 2004, 214, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lewis, E.B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 1978, 276, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mann, R.S.; Carroll, S.B. Moleculae mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mann, R.S.; Morata, G. The developmental and molecular biology of genes that subdivide the body of Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000, 16, 243–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McGinnis, W.; Krumlauf, R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 1992, 68, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berger, M.F.; Badis, G.; Gehrke, A.R.; Talukder, S.; Philippakis, A.A.; Penta-Castillo, L.; Alleyene, T.M.; Mnaimneh, S.; Botvinnik, O.B.; Chan, E.T.; et al. Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 2008, 133, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ekker, S.C.; Jackson, D.G.; Kessler, D.P.; Sun, B.I.; Young, K.E.; Beachy, P.A. The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 3551–3560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Gehring, W.J.; Qian, Y.Q.; Billeter, M.; Furukubo-Tokunaga, K.; Schier, A.F.; Resendez-Perez, D.; Affolter, M.; Otting, G.; Wuthrich, K. Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell 1994, 78, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mann, R.S. The specificity of homeotic gene function. BioEssays 1995, 17, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Noyes, M.B.; Christensen, R.G.; Wakabayashi, A.; Stormo, G.D.; Brodsky, M.H.; Wolfe, S.A. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 2008, 133, 1277–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ebner, A.; Cabernard, C.; Affolter, M.; Merabet, S. Recognition of distinct target sites by a unique Labial/Extradenticle/Homothorax complex. Development 2005, 132, 1591–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hayashi, S.; Scott, M.P. What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins? Cell 1990, 63, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huber, S.D.; Lohmann, I. Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age. BioEssays 2008, 30, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chang, C.-P.; Brocchieri, L.; Shen, W.-F.; Largman, C.; Cleary, M.L. Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16, 1734–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chan, S.-K.; Jaffe, L.; Capovilla, M.; Botas, J.; Mann, R.S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell 1994, 78, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chan, S.-K.; Mann, R.S. A structural model for a homeotic protein-extradenticle-DNA complex accounts for the choice of HOX protein in the heterodimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5223–5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Joshi, R.; Passner, J.M.; Rohs, R.; Jain, R.; Sosinsky, A.; Crickmore, M.A.; Jacob, V.; Aggarwal, A.K.; Honig, B.; Mann, R. Functional specificity of a Hox protein Mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell 2007, 131, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mann, R.S.; Lelli, K.M.; Joshi, R. Hox specificity: Unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2009, 88, 63–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Moens, C.B.; Selleri, L. Hox cofactors in vertebrate development. Dev. Biol. 2006, 291, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Slattery, M.; Riley, T.; Liu, P.; Abe, N.; Gomez-Alcala, P.; Dror, I.; Zhou, T.; Rohs, R.; Honig, B.; Bussemaker, H.J.; et al. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell 2011, 147, 1270–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Uhl, J.D.; Cook, T.A.; Gebelein, B. Comparing anterior and posterior Hox complex formation reveals guidelines for predicting cis-regulatory elements. Dev. Biol. 2010, 343, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Agrawal, P.; Habib, F.; Yelagandula, R.; Shashidhara, L.S. Genome-level identification of targets of Hox protein Ultrabitholax in Drosophila: Novel mechanisms for target selection. Sci. Rep. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hersh, B.M.; Nelson, C.E.; Stoll, S.J.; Norton, J.E.; Albert, T.J.; Caroll, S.B. The UBX-regulated network in the haltere imaginal disc of D. melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 2007, 302, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hueber, S.D.; Bezdan, D.; Henz, S.R.; Blank, M.; Wu, H.; Lohmann, I. Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila. Development 2007, 134, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Slattery, M.; Ma, L.; Negre, N.; White, K.P.; Mann, R.S. Genome-wide tissue-specific occupancy of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax and Hox cofactor Homothorax in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Galant, R.; Caroll, S.B. Evolution of a transcriptional repression domain in an insect Hox protein. Nature 2002, 415, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Galant, R.; Walsh, C.M.; Caroll, S.B. Hox repression of a target gene: extradenticle-independent, additive action through multiple monomer binding sites. Development 2002, 129, 3115–3126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Krasnow, M.A.; Saffman, E.E.; Kornfeld, K.; Hogness, D.S. Transcriptional activation and repression by Ultrabithorax proteins in cultured Drosohila cells. Cell 1989, 57, 1031–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, X.; Murre, C.; McGinnis, W. Activity regulation of a Hox protein and a role for the homeodomain in inhibiting transcriptional activation. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Merabet, S.; Kambris, Z.; Capovilla, M.; Berenger, H.; Pradel, J.; Graba, Y. The hexapeptide and linker regions of the AbdA Hox protein regulate its activating and repressive functions. Dev. Cell 2003, 4, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Papadopoulos, D.K.; Resendez-Perez, D.; Cardenas-Chavez, D.L.; Villanueva-Segura, K.; Canales-del-Castillo, R.; Felix, D.A.; Funfschilling, R.; Ghering, W.J. Functional synthetic Antennapedia genes and the dual roles of YPWM motif and linker size in transcriptional activation and repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11959–11964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Prince, F.; Katuyama, T.; Oshima, Y.; Plaza, S.; Resendez-Perez, D.; Berry, M.; Kurata, S.; Ghering, W.J. The YPWM motif links Antennapedia to the basal transcriptional machinery. Development 2008, 135, 1669–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ronshaugen, M.; McGinnis, N.; McGinnis, W. Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature 2002, 415, 914–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saadaoi, M.; Merabet, S.; Litim-Mecheri, I.; Arbeille, E.; Sambrani, N.; Damen, W.; Brena, C.; Pradel, J.; Graba, Y. Selection of distinct Hox-Extradenticle interaction modes fine-tunes Hox protein activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2276–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Winslow, G.M.; Hayashi, S.; Krasnow, M.; Hogness, D.S.; Scott, M.P. Transcriptional activation by the Antennapedia and fushi tarazu proteins in cultured Drosophila cells. Cell 1989, 57, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kimoto, M.; Kitagawa, T.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakata, T.; Kuroiwa, A.; Takiya, S. Inhibition of the binding of MSG-intermolt-specific complex, MIC, to the sericin-1 gene promoter and sericin-1 gene expression by POU-M1/SGF3. Dev. Genes Evol. 2012, 222, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kimoto, M.; Tsubota, T.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Takiya, S. Hox transcription factor Antp regulates sericin-1 gene expression in the terminal differentiated silk gland of Bombyx mori. Dev. Biol. 2014, 386, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kimoto, M.; Tsubota, T.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Takiya, S. LIM-homeodomain transcription factor Awh is a key component activating all three fibroin genes, fibH, fibL and fhx, in the silk gland of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 56, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ohno, K.; Sawada, J.; Takiya, S.; Kimoto, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Tsubota, T.; Uchino, K.; Hui, C.-C.; Sezutsu, H.; Handa, H.; et al. Silk gland factor-2, involved in fibroin gene transcription, consists of LIM homeodomain, LIM-interactiong, and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31581–31591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Takiya, S.; Inoue, H.; Kimoto, M. Novel enhancer and promoter elements indispensable for the tissue-specific expression of the sericin-1 gene of the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tsubota, T.; Tomita, S.; Uchino, K.; Kimoto, M.; Takiya, S.; Kajiwara, H.; Yamazaki, T.; Sezutsu, H. A Hox gene, Antennapedia, regulates expression of multiple major silk protein genes in the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 7087–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kokubo, H.; Takiya, S.; Mach, V.; Suzuki, Y. Spatial and temporal expression pattern of Bombyx fork head/SGF-1 gene in embryogenesis. Dev. Genes Evol. 1996, 206, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kokubo, H.; Ueno, K.; Amanai, K.; Suzuki, Y. Involvement of the Bombyx Scr gene in development of the embryonic silk gland. Dev. Biol. 1997, 186, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kokubo, H.; Xu, P.-X.; Xu, X.; Matsunami, K.; Suzuki, Y. Spatial and temporal expression pattern of POU-M1/SGF-3 in Bombyx mori embryogenesis. Dev. Genes Evol. 1997, 206, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Matsunami, K.; Kokubo, H.; Ohno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Expression pattern analysis of SGF-3/POU-M1 in relation to sericin-1 gene expression in the silk gland. Dev. Growth Differ. 1998, 40, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ohta, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Hara, W.; Takiya, S.; Suzuki, T. Fibroin gene transcription in the embryonic stages of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Dev. Growth Differ. 1988, 30, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Couble, P.; Michaille, J.-J.; Garel, A.; Couble, M.-L.; Prudohmme, J.-C. Developmental switches of sericin mRNA splicing in individual cells of Bombyx mori silk gland. Dev. Biol. 1987, 124, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ishikawa, E.; Suzuki, Y. Tissue-and stage-specific expression of sericin genes in the middle silk gland of Bombyx mori. Dev. Growth Differ. 1985, 27, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Michaille, J.-J.; Garel, A.; Prudhomme, J.-C. Cloning and characterization of the highly polymorphic Ser2 gene of Bombyx mori. Gene 1990, 86, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Obara, T.; Suzuki, Y. Temporal and spatial control of silk gene transcription analyzed by nuclear run-on assay. Dev. Biol. 1988, 127, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suzuki, Y.; Takiya, S.; Suzuki, T.; Hui, C.-C.; Matsuno, K.; Fukuta, M.; Nagata, T.; Ueno, K. Developmental regulation of silk gene expression in Bombyx mori. In Molecular Insect Science; Hagedorn, H.H., Hildebrand, J.G., Kidwell, M.G., Law, J.H., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  62. Takasu, Y.; Yamada, H.; Tamura, T.; Sezutsu, H.; Mita, K.; Tsubouchi, K. Identification and characterization of a novel sericin gene expressed in the anterior middle silk gland of the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Takasu, Y.; Hata, T.; Uchino, K.; Zhan, Q. Identification of Ser2 proteins as major sericin components in the non-cocoon silk of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kimura, K.; Oyama, F.; Ueda, H.; Mizuno, S.; Shimura, K. Molecular cloning of the fibroin light chain complementary DNA and its use in the study of the expression of the light chain gene in the posterior silk gland of Bombyx mori. Experientia 1985, 41, 1167–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Maekawa, H.; Suzuki, Y. Repeated turn-off and turn-on of fibroin gene transcription during silk gland development of Bombyx mori. Dev. Biol. 1980, 78, 394–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Suzuki, Y.; Giza, P.E. Accentuated expression of silk fibroin genes in vivo and in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 107, 183–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suzuki, Y.; Suzuki, E. Quantitative measurements of fibroin messenger RNA synthesis in the posterior silk gland of normal and mutant Bombyx mori. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 88, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bello, B.; Horard, B.; Couble, P. The selective expression of silk-protein encoding genes in Bombyx mori silk gland. Bull. Inst. Pasteur. 1994, 92, 81–100. [Google Scholar]
  69. Couble, P.; Moine, A.; Garel, A.; Prudhomme, J.-C. Developmental variations of a nonfibroin mRNA of Bombyx mori silkgland, encoding for a low-molecular-weight silk protein. Dev. Biol. 1983, 97, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Couble, P.; Chevillard, M.; Moine, A.; Revel-Chapuis, P.; Prudhomme, J.-C. Structural organization of the P25 gene of Bombyx mori and comparative analysis of its 5′ flanking DNA with that of the fibroin gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 1801–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Inoue, S.; Tanaka, K.; Arisaka, F.; Kimura, S.; Ohtomo, K.; Mizuno, S. Silk fibroin of Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular elementary unit consisting of H-chain, L-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 40517–40528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Garel, A.; Deleage, G.; Prudhomme, J.-C. Structure and organization of the Bombyx mori sericin 1 gene and of the sericins1 deduced from the sequence of the ser 1B cDNA. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1997, 27, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Dong, Z.; Wang, D.; Guo, P.; Guo, X.; Song, Q.; Zhang, W.; Xia, Q. Comparative proteome analysis of multi-layer cocoon of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dhawan, S.; Gopinathan, K.P. Expression pattern of Cubitus interruptus from the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori in late developmental stages. Dev. Genes Evol. 2003, 213, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Dhawan, S.; Gopinathan, K.P. Expression profiling of homeobox genes in silk gland development in the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori. Dev. Genes Evol. 2003, 213, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hui, C.-C.; Matsuno, K.; Ueno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular characterization and silkgland expression pattern of Bombyx engrailed and invected genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shimizu, K.; Ogawa, S.; Hino, R.; Adachi, T.; Tomita, M.; Yoshizato, K. Structure and function of 5′-flanking regions of a novel transcription enhancing element with a homeodomain protein-binding motif. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hui, C.-C.; Matsuno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Fibroin gene promoter contains a cluster of homeodomain binding sites that interact with three silk gland factors. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 213, 651–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Takiya, S.; Kokubo, H.; Suzuki, Y. Transcriptional regulatory elements upstream and intron of the fibroin gene bind three specific factors POU-M1, Bm Fkh and FMBP-1. Biochem. J. 1997, 321, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Takiya, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Ohtsuka, K.; Nishita, Y.; Suzuki, Y. Fibroin-modulator-binding protein-1 (FMBP-1) contains a novel DNA-binding domain, repeats of the score and three amino acid peptode (STP), conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Horard, B.; Julien, E.; Nony, P.; Garel, A.; Couble, P. Differential binding of the Bombyx silk gland-specific factor SGFB to its target DNA sequence drives posterior-cell-restricted expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 1572–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Durand, B.; Drevet, J.; Couble, P. P25 gene regulation in Bombyx mori silk gland: Two promoter-binding factors have distinct tissue and developmental specificities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 5768–5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Julien, E.; Bordeaux, M.-C.; Garel, A.; Couble, P. Fork head alternative binding drives stage-specific gene expression in the silk gland of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mack, V.; Takiya, S.; Ohno, K.; Handa, H.; Imai, T.; Suzuki, Y. Silk gland factor-1 involved in the regulation of Bombyx sericin-1 gene contain fork head motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 9340–9346. [Google Scholar]
  85. Matsuno, K.; Hui, C.-C.; Takiya, S.; Suzuki, T.; Ueno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Transcriptional signals and protein binding sites for sericin gene transcription in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 18707–18713. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Matsuno, K.; Takiya, S.; Hui, C.-C.; Fukuta, M.; Ueno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Transcriptional stimulation via SC site of Bombyx sericin-1 gene through an interaction with a DNA binding protein SGF-3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 1853–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Takiya, S.; Gazi, M.; Mach, V. The DNA binding of insect Fork head factor is strongly influenced by the negative cooperation of neighbouring bases. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 33, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Foos, N.; Maurel-Zaffran, C.; Mate, M.J.; Vincentelli, R.; Hainaut, M.; Berenger, H.; Pradel, J.; Saurin, A.J.; Ortiz-Lombardia, M.; Graba, Y. A flexible extension of the Drosophila Ultrabithorax homeodomain defines a novel Hox/PBC interaction mode. Structure 2015, 23, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hudry, B.; Remacle, S.; Delfini, M.-C.; Rezsohazy, R.; Graba, Y.; Merabet, S. Hox proteins display a common and ancestral ability to diversify their interaction mode with PBC class cofactors. PLoS Biol. 2012, e1001351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hirose, S.; Suzuki, Y. In vitro transcription of eukaryotic genes is affected differently by the degree of DNA supercoiling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 718–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Suzuki, Y.; Tsuda, M.; Takiya, S.; Hirose, S.; Suzuki, E.; Kameda, M.; Ninaki, O. Tissue-specific transcription enhancement of the fibroin gene characterized by cell-free systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 9522–9526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Takiya, S.; Hui, C.-C.; Suzuki, Y. A contribution of the core-promoter and its surrounding regions to the preferential transcription of the fibroin gene in posterior silk gland extracts. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Tsuda, M.; Suzuki, Y. Faithful transcription initiation of fibroin gene in a homologous cell-free system reveals an enhancing effect of 5′ flanking sequence far upstream. Cell 1981, 27, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tsuda, M.; Suzuki, Y. Transcription modulation in vitro of the fibroin gene exerted by a 200-base-pair region upstream from the “TATA” box. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 7442–7446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tsuda, M.; Hirose, S.; Suzuki, Y. Participation of the upstream region of the fibroin gene in the formation of transcription complex in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 3928–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tsujimoto, Y.; Suzuki, Y. The DNA sequence of Bombyx mori fibroin gene including the 5′ flanking, mRNA coding, entire intervening and fibroin protein coding regions. Cell 1979, 18, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tsujimoto, Y.; Suzuki, Y. Natural fibroin genes purified without using cloning procedures from fibroin-producing and nonproducing tissues reveal indistinguishable structure and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 1644–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fukuta, M.; Matsuno, K.; Hui, C.-C.; Nagata, T.; Takiya, S.; Xu, P.-X.; Ueno, K.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular cloning of a POU domain-containing factor involved in the regulation of the Bombyx sericin-1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 19471–19475. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Bello, B.; Couble, P. Specific expression of a silk-encoding gene of Bombyx in the anterior salivary gland of Drosophila. Nature 1990, 346, 480–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Curtiss, J.; Heilig, J.S. Establishment of Drosophila imaginal precursor cells controlled by Arrowhead gene. Development 1995, 121, 3819–3828. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Nony, P.; Prudhomme, J.-C.; Couble, P. Regulation of the P25 gene transcription in the silk gland of Bombyx. Biol. Cell. 1995, 84, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, X.-M.; Liu, C.; Li, Q.-Y.; Hu, W.-B.; Zhou, M.-T.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Peng, Z.-C.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q.-Y. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Bmsage is involved in regulation of fibroin-H-chain gene via interaction with SGF1 in Bombyx mori. PLoS ONE 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Xu, P.-X.; Fukuta, M.; Takiya, S.; Matsuno, K.; Xu, X.; Suzuki, Y. Promoter of the POU-M1/SGF-3 gene involved in the expression of Bombyx silk genes. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 2733–2742. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Tolkunova, E.N.; Fujioka, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Deka, D.; Jaynes, J.B. Two distinct types of repression domain in engrailed: one interacts with the groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 2804–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gebelein, B.; McKay, D.J.; Mann, R.S. Direct integration of Hox and segmentation gene inputs during Drosophila development. Nature 2004, 431, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Merabet, S.; Pradel, J.; Graba, Y. Getting a molecular grasp on Hox contextual activity. Trends Genet. 2005, 21, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hui, C.-C.; Suzuki, Y.; Kikuchi, Y.; Mizuno, S. Homeodomain binding sites in the 5′ flanking region of the Bombyx mori silk fibroin light-chain gene. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 213, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hui, C.-C.; Suzuki, Y. Homeodomain binding sites in the promoter region of silk protein genes. Dev. Growth Differ. 1990, 32, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Oh, S.-K.; Scott, M.P.; Sarnow, P. Homeotic gene Antennapedia mRNA contains 5′-noncoding sequences that confer translational initiation by internal ribosome binding. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 1643–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kondrashov, N.; Pusic, A.; Stumpf, C.R.; Shimizu, K.; Hsieh, A.C.; Xue, S.; Ishijima, J.; Shiroishi, T.; Barna, M. Ribosome-mediated specificity in Hox mRNA translation and vertebrate tissue patterning. Cell 2011, 145, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Xue, S.; Tian, S.; Fujii, K.; Kladwang, W.; Das, R.; Barna, M. RNA regulons in Hox 5′ UTRs confer ribosome specificity to gene regulation. Nature 2015, 517, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kmita, M.; Duboule, D. Organizing axes in time and space; 25 years of colinear tinkering. Science 2003, 301, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Noordermeer, D.; Leleu, M.; Splinter, E.; Rougemont, J.; de Laat, W.; Duboule, D. The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 2011, 334, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zakany, J.; Kmita, M.; Duboule, D. A dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior asymmetry. Science 2004, 304, 1669–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Horard, B.; Mange, A.; Pelisser, B.; Couble, P. Bombyx gene promoter analysis in transplanted silk gland transformed by particle delivery system. Insect Mol. Biol. 1994, 3, 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang, H.-B.; Nita, M.; Iwanaga, M.; Kawasaki, H. βFTZ-F1 and Broad-complex positively regulate the transcription of the wing cuticle protein gene, BMWCP5, in wing discs of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tamura, T.; Kuwabara, N.; Uchino, K.; Kobayashi, I.; Kanda, T. An improved DNA injection method for silkworm eggs drastically increases the efficiency of producing transgenic silkworms. J. Insect Biotech. Sericol. 2007, 76, 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  118. Imamura, M.; Nakai, J.; Inoue, S.; Quan, G.X.; Kanda, T.; Tamura, T. Targeted gene expression using the GAL4/UAS system in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Genetics 2003, 165, 1329–1340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Tamura, T.; Thibert, C.; Royer, C.; Kanda, T.; Eppen, A.; Kamba, M.; Komoto, N.; Thomas, J.L.; Mauchamp, B.; Chavancy, G.; et al. Germline transformation of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. using a piggyBac transposon-derived vector. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Takasu, Y.; Sajwan, S.; Damion, T.; Osanai-Futanashi, M.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Tamura, T.; Zurovec, M. Efficient TALEN construction for Bombyx mori gene targeting. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nakade, S.; Tsubota, T.; Sakano, Y.; Kume, S.; Sakamoto, N.; Obara, M.; Daimon, T.; Sezutsu, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Sakuma, T.; et al. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Toyama, K. Mendel’s low of heredity as applied to the silkworm crosses. Biol. Zbl. 1906, 26, 321–334. [Google Scholar]
Jdb 04 00019 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic of the silk gland of Bombyx mori. ASG; anterior silk gland, MSG; middle silk gland, MSG-A; anterior portion of the MSG, MSG-M; middle portion of the MSG, MSG-P; posterior portion of the MSG, PSG; posterior silk gland, PSG-A; anterior half of the PSG; PSG-P; posterior half of the PSG. In order to avoid contamination of the neighbor regions, each portion was prepared as shown in this figure. The structural border is not observed in the PSG, and so the long tubular tissue was divided simply into the anterior and posterior halves.
Figure 1. Schematic of the silk gland of Bombyx mori. ASG; anterior silk gland, MSG; middle silk gland, MSG-A; anterior portion of the MSG, MSG-M; middle portion of the MSG, MSG-P; posterior portion of the MSG, PSG; posterior silk gland, PSG-A; anterior half of the PSG; PSG-P; posterior half of the PSG. In order to avoid contamination of the neighbor regions, each portion was prepared as shown in this figure. The structural border is not observed in the PSG, and so the long tubular tissue was divided simply into the anterior and posterior halves.
Jdb 04 00019 g001
Table
Table 1. Region-specific expression of the genes for silk proteins, and Hox and some homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors in the silk gland.
Table 1. Region-specific expression of the genes for silk proteins, and Hox and some homeodomain-containing transcriptional factors in the silk gland.
Silk GeneASG (1)MSGPSGReference
Anterior (1)Middle (1)Posterior (1)Anterior (1),(2)Posterior (1),(2)
Silk Fiber Protein
fibH−−−−+++ (3)+++[48]
fibL−−−−++++++[48]
fhx−−−−++++++[48]
Glue Protein
ser1−−++++++−−[46,47,51]
ser2−+++++−−−[51]
ser3−++++++−−−[51]
fhxh4−−+++++−−[51]
fhxh5−−+++++−−[51]
Hox Gene
lab+++/−++++[47]
Scr+++/−−−−−[47]
Antp−++ (4)++++−−[47]
Ubx−−−+/−+/−+/−[47]
abd-A−+++++[47]
Abd-B++/−−−−+[47]
Homeobox Gene (5)
Awh−−−−++++[48]
En++/−++−−[47]
in++−+++−−[47]
Pou-m1+++++−−−[46,47]
cad++/−+/−+/−−−[47]
exd++++++++++++[47]
hth++/−++++++[47]
(1) Total RNA prepared from each region of the silk gland at two days or three days (in the reference [51]) of the fifth instar was used for RT-PCR; (2) The structral border is not observed within the PSG. The long tissue was divided simply into the anterior and posterior halves.; (3) Results of RT-PCR are summarized. (+++) detectable with less than 25 cycles, (++) detectable with 30 cycles, (+) detectable with 35 cycles, (+/−) barely detectable with more than 35 cycles, and (−) undetectable. Expression levels were not be compared between different genes.; (4) The Antp gene is efficiently transcribed, whereas the Antp protein was not detected in the MSG-A with Western blotting.; (5) Genes encoding homeodomain-containing proteins except for the Hox genes.
Table
Table 2. Nucleotide sequence around the regulatory elements of the silk gene promoter.
Table 2. Nucleotide sequence around the regulatory elements of the silk gene promoter.
GenePositionStrandFactorSequenceReference
Silk Fiber Protein
fibH−1620−SGF-2CTTG CAATTA AGCACTTATTC[77]
−200+SGF-2GAT CAATTA AAT CATAATTA ATC (3)[48,49,78]
−110−SGF-2GATA CAATTA CATAG AAATTA ATC (3)[48,49,78]
−270−Fkh (1)GTAA TATTTAAAGA ACTTA
−130−Fkh, FMBP-1ATCT TTTTATTTAACAT AACAA (4)[79,80]
−70+FkhTAGA TGTTTATTCT ATCG[78]
−60−Fkh (2)GACG TATTTACTTT CGAT
−130+POU-M1TGTT ATGTTAAA TAAA[78]
−110+POU-M1TTCT ATGTAATT GTATC[78]
fibL−230+SGF-2 (1)GGAT CAATTA GATCGCTTTG
−50−SGF-2AAGA CAATTA AAA TAAATA TC (3)[48]
−50+Fkh (1), FMBP-1 (1)TTGA TATTTATTTT AATTG (4)
−30−Fkh (1), FMBP-1 (1)CCAC TATTTATATA TAAAA (5)
fhx−30+SGF-2GGAA CAAT ACTTG TATAATTA ATGTTG (6)[48,81]
+100+SGF-2 (1)GGT CAATTA TAACTAC
−70+Fkh, FMBP-1 (1)ACGC TATTTATTTA ACGT (4)[81,82,83]
Glue Protein
ser1−1350+MICTAATGC AATTAATATC GTATC[50]
−310+MICAATTCC AATTAATTAT AGTCG[50]
−180+MICGAAATC AATTAATAAC ATAAA[50]
−70+MICGCGAA AATTTATTAC TCTCT[50]
−160−Fkh (1)ATTT TGTTTGCCTA TTTTA
−120+Fkh (1)AGAA CGTTTGTTGA ACAA
−90+FkhACAT TGTTTGCACA AATGTT[84,85,86]
−200+POU-M1AGCC ATGAATAA ATTAG[85,86]
−140−POU-M1CTCT ATGTAAAT GGTTT[85,86]
ser3−90+MIC, Fkh (2), FMBP-1 (1)AAAT AATTAATTATTTATTTT ATTG (4)[51]
−100−Fkh (2)TAAT TATTTGTTTA ATACAC
−30−Fkh (1)CGGC TATTTATACT AATTT (7)
−70−POU-M1 (1)CTTT ATGAATAA ACAG
fhxh4−1660−MICAAATT GATTTATGAC AGAG[51]
−180−Fkh (1)TTTT TGTTTAATTA TTAT
−160−Fkh (1)TTTT TGTTTAATTT TTTT
−60+Fkh (1)TAAA TGTTTATTTT CTTAT
−40−Fkh (1)ACTG TGTTTAAATT ATGTT
−30+Fkh (1)TGCT TATTTATATG TAAG (8)
fhxh5−300−MICAATGA GATTTATAAT ATTGAT[51]
−200+Fkh (1)CTTG TATTTAGATT ATTTA
−130+Fkh (1)ATATAA TATTTAATGT AAACG
−60−Fkh (1)GTGTAA TATTTGCTGG ATATTA
−30−Fkh (1)AAACT AGTTTGTATA ATTCC
(1) Presumption from consensus sequences; (2) Takiya, unpublished results; (3) Paired SGF-2-binding element; (4) The FMBP-1-binding element “ATNTWTNTA” or its variations overlapped; (5) The Fkh-binding element and FMBP-1-binding element overlapped with the TATA box; (6) The incomplete paired SGF-2-binding element overlapped with the TATA box; (7) The Fkh-binding element overlapped with the TATA box; (8) The TATA box of fhxh4 might be a weak Fkh-binding element. Affinity of Fkh to various sequence elements was estimated experimentally in reference [87].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takiya, S.; Tsubota, T.; Kimoto, M. Regulation of Silk Genes by Hox and Homeodomain Proteins in the Terminal Differentiated Silk Gland of the Silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb4020019

AMA Style

Takiya S, Tsubota T, Kimoto M. Regulation of Silk Genes by Hox and Homeodomain Proteins in the Terminal Differentiated Silk Gland of the Silkworm Bombyx mori. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2016; 4(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb4020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takiya, Shigeharu, Takuya Tsubota, and Mai Kimoto. 2016. "Regulation of Silk Genes by Hox and Homeodomain Proteins in the Terminal Differentiated Silk Gland of the Silkworm Bombyx mori" Journal of Developmental Biology 4, no. 2: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb4020019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop