Next Article in Journal
Nutrient-Deprived Retinal Progenitors Proliferate in Response to Hypoxia: Interaction of the HIF-1 and mTOR Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Developmental Mechanism of Limb Field Specification along the Anterior–Posterior Axis during Vertebrate Evolution
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Functional and Comparative Genomics of Hoxa2 Gene cis-Regulatory Elements: Evidence for Evolutionary Modification of Ancestral Core Element Activity
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4(2), 16; doi:10.3390/jdb4020016

Mechanisms of Specificity for Hox Factor Activity

1
Molecular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
2
Medical-Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
3
Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Vincenzo Zappavigna and Simon J. Conway
Received: 5 April 2016 / Revised: 2 May 2016 / Accepted: 4 May 2016 / Published: 9 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hox Genes and Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3358 KB, uploaded 9 May 2016]   |  

Abstract

Metazoans encode clusters of paralogous Hox genes that are critical for proper development of the body plan. However, there are a number of unresolved issues regarding how paralogous Hox factors achieve specificity to control distinct cell fates. First, how do Hox paralogs, which have very similar DNA binding preferences in vitro, drive different transcriptional programs in vivo? Second, the number of potential Hox binding sites within the genome is vast compared to the number of sites bound. Hence, what determines where in the genome Hox factors bind? Third, what determines whether a Hox factor will activate or repress a specific target gene? Here, we review the current evidence that is beginning to shed light onto these questions. In particular, we highlight how cooperative interactions with other transcription factors (especially PBC and HMP proteins) and the sequences of cis-regulatory modules provide a basis for the mechanisms of Hox specificity. We conclude by integrating a number of the concepts described throughout the review in a case study of a highly interrogated Drosophila cis-regulatory module named “The Distal-less Conserved Regulatory Element” (DCRE). View Full-Text
Keywords: Hox; transcription factor; cis-regulatory modules; DNA binding specificity Hox; transcription factor; cis-regulatory modules; DNA binding specificity
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zandvakili, A.; Gebelein, B. Mechanisms of Specificity for Hox Factor Activity. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 16.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Dev. Biol. EISSN 2221-3759 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top