Next Article in Journal
Shape Coexistence in Even–Even Nuclei: A Theoretical Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
Isomers in the Cosmos
Previous Article in Journal
Energetic and Spectroscopic Properties of the Low-Lying Isomers of C5H: A High-Level Ab Initio Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Setup for the Ionic Lifetime Measurement of the 229mTh3+ Nuclear Clock Isomer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Search for Weak Side Branches in the Electromagnetic Decay Paths of the 6526-keV 10+ Isomer in 54Fe

by
Paul Böhm
1,
Yuliia Hrabar
1,
Dirk Rudolph
1,*,
Pavel Golubev
1,
Luis G. Sarmiento
1,
Helena M. Albers
2,
John T. Anderson
3,
Michael A. Bentley
4,
Michael P. Carpenter
3,
Christopher J. Chiara
5,
Patrick A. Copp
3,†,
Ulrika Forsberg
1,‡,
Tianheng Huang
3,
Heshani Jayatissa
3,†,
Torben Lauritsen
3,
Claus Müller-Gatermann
3,
Xesus Pereira-Lopez
4,§,
Walter Reviol
3,
Darek Seweryniak
3,
Sanna Stolze
3,
Sivahami Uthayakumaar
4,‖,
Gemma L. Wilson
3,6,¶ and
Jin Wu
3,**
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Physics, Lund University, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
2
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
3
Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA
4
Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
5
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA
6
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Current address: Studsvik Nuclear AB, 610 60 Linköping, Sweden.
§
Current address: Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea.
Current address: Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Current address: United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK.
**
Current address: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY 11873, USA.
Atoms 2023, 11(9), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11090116
Submission received: 27 July 2023 / Revised: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Over a Century of Nuclear Isomers: Challenges and Prospects)

Abstract

:
High-spin nuclear isomers in N Z nuclei between doubly magic 40 Ca and 56 Ni provide an excellent testing ground for the nuclear shell model and questions related to isospin symmetry breaking in the vicinity of the proton drip line. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the possibility of weak electromagnetic decay branches along the decay paths of the 6526-keV 10 + isomer in 54 Fe. The isomer was strongly populated by means of the fusion-evaporation reaction 24 Mg( 36 Ar, α 2 p ) 54 m Fe. The Gammasphere array was used to detect γ -ray cascades emitted from the isomeric state. By means of γ γ γ coincidences, weak non-yrast decay branches can be discriminated, with the isomer’s half-life confirmed at T 1 / 2 = 363 ( 4 ) ns. The yrast 6 1 + 2 1 +   E 4 cross-over transition was interrogated. The observations are compared with shell-model calculations.

1. Introduction

In the vicinity of self-conjugated N Z nuclei between 20 40 Ca 20 and 28 56 Ni 28 , strongly attractive two-body matrix-elements between neutron and proton f 7 / 2 particles (or holes) give rise to spin-gap isomers with high angular momenta. Examples near 56 Ni are I π = 7 + in 27 54 Co 27 , I π = 12 + in 26 52 Fe 26 , or I π = 19 / 2 in case of the A = 53 ( 26 53 Fe 27 and 27 53 Co 26 ) ‘mirror isomers’, respectively. The I π = 10 + ‘mirror isomers’ in the A = 54 nuclei 26 54 Fe 28 and 28 54 Ni 26 are core-excited states. To first order, they arise from closely lying multiplets of states, which are based on the coupling of a respective A = 53 ‘mirror isomer’ with a single nucleon in the upper f p shell. In fact, energy differences between excited states in N = 3 , f p -shell mirror nuclei have been and continue to be a rich source of information on isospin symmetry breaking at or beyond the proton dripline. For background material as well as more recent developments, see, for instance, Refs. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] and references therein.
For some neutron-deficient mirror partners, e.g., 53 m Co and 54 m Ni, Q values allow for intriguing competition between electromagnetic decays ( E 2 and/or E 4 ), β -decay, and proton radioactivity. In fact, the observation of a weak = 9 proton-emission branch from the 3174-keV 53 m Co isomeric state into the ground state of 52 Fe marked the discovery of proton radioactivity in atomic nuclei in 1970 [8,9]. Interestingly, it took more than 50 years to disentangle the complete decay pattern of this isomeric state by means of a combination of Penning-trap-assisted decay spectroscopy and 4D imaging of charged-particle decays with a time-projection chamber [10]. In the same experimental campaign, both proton-emission branches of 54 m Ni were determined [11,12]. The new experimental results were compared to cutting-edge shell-model and barrier penetration calculations for these (very) high- protons with = 5 , 7, and 9, all (very) far beyond the N = 3 , f 7 / 2 shell [10,11]. Further, the complete decay pattern of 54 m Ni allowed the derivation of reduced transition strengths, B ( E 2 ; 10 1 + 8 1 + ) and B ( E 4 ; 10 1 + 6 1 + ) , for the two competing γ -ray transitions from 54 m Ni [13]. By means of a comparison with their well-known ‘mirror transitions’ in T z = + 1   54 Fe, effective charges for E 4 transitions near N = Z   56 Ni could be suggested. The B ( E 6 ; 19 / 2 7 / 2 ) strength in 53 m Fe has recently been used to study effective charges for E 6 transitions [14].
A basic requirement for any elaborate study on isospin symmetry breaking is comprehensive knowledge of the relevant observables of the more neutron-rich partner. Here, we report on a dedicated study to complement the electromagnetic decay pattern of the well-known 6526-keV, 10 + isomer 54 m Fe [15,16,17].

2. Experiment

The experiment was conducted at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). A beam of 36 Ar 11 + ions accelerated to 88 MeV was provided by the ATLAS facility. With typical intensities of 40 enA, the beam impinged on a 0.43 mg/cm 2 thick foil of 99.92 % enriched 24 Mg. This self-supporting foil was positioned inside a vacuum chamber in the center of the Gammasphere array used for high-fold γ -ray detection purposes [18]. At the time of the experiment, Gammasphere operated with 70 Compton-suppressed Ge detectors, because the experimental set-up comprised a number of ancillary devices to detect, for instance, evaporated neutrons with the help of 32 liquid scintillator detectors [19]. These occupied the respective slots for Gammasphere modules at forward angles with respect to the beam direction. Further, a combination of the 4 π CsI(Tl) array Microball [20] and two CD-type double-sided Si strip detectors (DSSD) facilitated the detection, tracking, and spectroscopy of light-charged particles such as protons, deuterons, and α particles. Information on recoiling residual nuclei entering the Fragment Mass Analyzer (FMA) [21] in a narrow cone in the beam direction and reaching its focal plane was stored as well. More information on the complete experimental set-up can be found in, for instance, Chapter 2 of Ref. [22].
For the present study on the electromagnetic decay paths of 54 m Fe, only Compton-suppressed γ γ and γ γ γ coincidence events from the Gammasphere array are relevant. High-spin states of 54 Fe are populated in the reaction 24 Mg ( 36 Ar, α 2 p ) 54 Fe with the majority of the yield populating the 6526-keV, 10 + isomer 54 m Fe [17]. The isomer has a reported T 1 / 2 = 364 ( 7 ) ns [15,16]. Further, for the vast majority of the events of interest, the evaporation of an α particle in the production process causes 54 Fe recoils to be deflected from the beam direction, such that they are implanted and stopped in Ta foils protecting the DSSDs from radiation damage. In essence, this yields a stationary radioactive source of 54 m Fe close to the center of the Gammasphere array. Moreover, this source is continuously produced during the experiment. It primarily emits a cascade of five E 2 transitions with energies E γ = 146 , 411, 1130, 1408, and 3432 keV (see Figure 1 and Ref. [17]), thereby covering the typical energy range relevant for γ -ray spectroscopy experiments.
Prior to the experiment, a provisional energy calibration of the Gammasphere Ge detectors was accomplished with the help of radioactive 207 Bi sources. Between the present experiment, using the fusion-evaporation of 36 Ar+ 24 Mg, and the second experiment of the campaign at ANL, using 40 Ca+ 24 Mg [22], extensive γ -ray energy and efficiency calibration data were taken using 133 Ba, 152 Eu, and 182 Ta sources placed in the center of the array.

3. Data Analysis and Results

Regarding the γ -ray analysis of the experimental campaign, a base calibration of all Ge detectors was established from the aforementioned source data [22]. Small variations of, e.g., environmental conditions during the week-long experiments can give rise to small drifts of the amplified and digitized signals of the Ge detectors. Therefore, the complete data set was divided into 10- to 12-h long sub-sets, and the gain of each individual Ge detector was re-aligned for each sub-set. For the present experiment, a semi-automated procedure was developed using the distinct 146 and 3432-keV peak positions of the ample 54 m Fe decays, as well as the 511-keV peak stemming primarily from β + -decay related positron annihilation [23].
Apart from marginal, i.e., practically non-existing contributions of the 10 + mirror isomer in 54 Ni [13,15], a prompt coincidence with the 146-keV 10 1 + 8 1 + transition highlights decays of 54 m Fe. To establish an appropriate choice of time differences, Δ t , a correlation matrix Δ t ( γ 1 , γ 2 ) - E γ 2 was created, pre-selected with E γ 1 = 146 keV. As a result, the γ -ray spectrum in blue in Figure 2a shows the background-subtracted spectrum of events with Δ t = [ 20 , 60 ] ns. The spectrum is selective for γ rays depopulating the 6380-keV yrast 8 1 + state in 54 Fe. In turn, the background-subtracted spectrum in grey in Figure 2a corresponds to Δ t = [ 0.15 , 2.00 ]   μ s. It shows broad peaks of Doppler-shifted γ -ray transitions feeding the 10 + isomer in 54 Fe (cf. Figure 1). In fact, selecting several of these feeding γ -ray transitions, projecting on Δ t , and analyzing the resulting time spectrum, a half-life value of T 1 / 2 = 363 ( 4 ) ns of the 10 + isomer in 54 Fe can be derived. This is consistent with the literature value T 1 / 2 = 364 ( 7 ) ns [15]. Note that the 511-keV line in Figure 2a arises from escape events following pair-production detection of the high-energy 3432-keV transition (cf. Figure 1), in combination with its single and double escape peaks.
In the next step of the γ -ray analysis, an E γ 2 - E γ 3   γ γ correlation matrix was sorted, pre-selected by E γ 1 = 146 keV and using a prompt time window Δ t ( γ 1 , γ i ) = [ 20 , 60 ] ns, i = 2 , 3 . Corresponding matrices for delayed coincidences with the 146-keV line, Δ t = [ 0.15 , 2.00 ]   μ s, and random coincidences, Δ t = [ 2.00 , 0.50 ]   μ s, were created, inspected, and used for reference. A search was undertaken for (i) γ -ray transitions connecting the 6380-keV 8 1 + state with known 6 + and 7 + states in 54 Fe, other than the 2948-keV yrast 6 1 + level [17], and (ii) the possible 1541-keV, 6 1 + 2 1 +   E 4 decay.
The results concerning hitherto unobserved transitions are exemplified in Figure 2b–d. They are summarized in Table 1. The experimental branching ratios are deduced from efficiency-corrected γ -ray yields of observed peaks in appropriate coincidence spectra as described in the following. First, a weak E γ 3 = 453 -keV line is seen in prompt coincidence with the E γ 2 = 2980 keV, 7 1 + 6 1 + transition. This coincidence is seen more clearly in the spectrum shown in Figure 2b, where E γ 3 in the above mentioned prompt coincidence matrix is shown, selected by the E γ 2 = 411 , 1130, and 1408-keV transitions forming the 6 1 + 4 1 + 2 1 + 0 1 + yrast cascade. Figure 2b also reveals a weak peak at 2980 keV, altogether confirming the presence of the 453-keV connection between the 6380-keV 8 1 + and 5928-keV 7 1 + levels, rather than that peak originating from Compton-scattered events of the main 3432-keV transition between two Ge detectors (cf. Figure 19 in Ref. [23]).
The γ -ray spectrum in Figure 2c represents E γ 3 selected by the previously known E γ 2 = 737 , 757, and 1249-keV transitions, which form the most intense cascade between the 5280-keV 6 3 + and 2537-keV 4 1 + states [17]. The spectrum shows an obvious peak at 1100 keV, next to the 1130 and 1408-keV yrast transitions. This combination assures the placement of the former between the 6380-keV 8 1 + and 5280-keV 6 3 + states, establishing another weak decay path parallel to the intense 3432-keV yrast transition. Next, the γ -ray spectrum in Figure 2d shows E γ 3 selected by the unknown E γ 2 = 1336 -keV transition, placed between the 6380-keV 8 1 + and the 5046-keV 6 2 + states in Figure 1. The spectrum reveals weak coincidences with the cascade depopulating the 6 + yrast level (only the 1408-keV line is shown for clarity), and also with the 2097-keV 6 2 + 6 1 + transition. Further connections between the yrast 8 1 + state and other yrare 6 + or 7 + states (cf. Figure 1) cannot be identified. Hence, only upper limits of their branching ratios can be provided in Table 1.
Similarly, also the search for a ( 411 + 1130 ) keV = 1541 keV, 6 + 2 +   E 4 cross-over transition proved negative. Though spectra in coincidence with the yrast E γ 2 = 1408 and 3432 keV transitions show a peak at E γ 3 1540 keV, a peak at E γ 3 = ( 411 + 1408 ) keV = 1819 keV is observed with similar yield in spectra in coincidence with E γ 2 = 1130 and 3432 keV transitions, respectively. The presence of the 1540 keV peak (and the 1819 keV peak) is thus primarily caused by coincident summing, i.e., simultaneous hits of a single Ge-detector crystal by two γ rays stemming from the same isomeric decay event.
Note that the present results were cross-checked and found consistent with data sets from earlier experiments with Gammasphere and fusion-evaporation reactions leading to the same compound nucleus 60 Zn [17].

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The experimental results on branching ratios are compared with shell-model calculations in Table 1. The calculations correspond to those labeled KB3G56 in Ref. [13]. They include the isospin-breaking terms V C M , V C s , V C r , and V B : 2 , as outlined in Ref. [13], and are conducted in the full f p space, with up to t = 6 particles allowed to cross the shell gap at N = Z = 28 . Electromagnetic transition rates are calculated using bare g factors for M 1 transitions, effective charges ϵ p = 1.15 e and ϵ n = 0.80 e for E 2 transitions [24], and ϵ p = 1.40 e and ϵ n = 0.30 e for E 4 transitions [13].
Concerning the newly observed (very) weak decay branches from the 6380-keV 8 1 + level, very good agreement is found between experiment and theory. Given that all experimental and theoretical branching ratios of interest are on the level of 1/1000 or below, the transitions predicted b γ > 1 ‰ were observed, while those predicted b γ < 1 ‰ correspondingly were not. The predicted B ( E 4 ; 6 1 + 2 1 + ) 1 W.u. is of similar strength as the observed 3578-keV 10 + 6 1 + decay. However, scaling its b γ 2 % with relative E 2 [ ( 146 / 411 ) 5 = 5.7 · 10 3 ] and E 4 [ ( 1541 / 3578 ) 9 = 5.1 · 10 4 ] phase space factors readily explains its very low predicted branching ratio on the order of a few times 10 8 , which agrees with the derived experimental upper limit.

Author Contributions

D.R. prepared the proposal for the experiment at ANL with support from M.A.B., M.P.C., P.G., W.R. and D.S. The set-up at ANL was prepared by J.T.A., M.P.C., P.A.C., U.F., P.G., T.H., C.M.-G., W.R., D.R., D.S. and J.W. Software for data acquisition and data analysis was prepared by H.M.A., P.B., U.F., Y.H., T.L., D.R., L.G.S. and D.S. All authors but J.T.A. and P.B. participated in monitoring data taking during the experiment. P.B. conducted the formal analysis of the specific results on 54 m Fe and provided input to the figures, supervised by Y.H. and D.R. D.R. prepared the original draft and P.B., Y.H., D.R., H.M.A., M.A.B., M.P.C., C.J.C., H.J., C.M.-G., W.R. and D.S. were engaged in review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, VR 2016-3969 and VR 2022-3828), the Crafoord Foundation in Lund (Grant 20180630), the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics (Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357), and the UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council under grant numbers ST/P003885/1 and ST/V001035/1.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the ATLAS accelerator crew for their supreme efforts. This research used resources of ANL’s ATLAS facility, which is a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility. The isotope(s) used in this research were supplied by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science by the Isotope Program in the Office of Nuclear Physics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ANLArgonne National Laboratory
ATLASArgonne Tandem Linac Accelerator System
DSSDDouble-sided Si Strip Detector
FMAFragment Mass Analyzer

References

  1. Bentley, M.A.; Lenzi, S.M. Coulomb energy differences between high-spin states in isobaric multiplets. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2007, 59, 497–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ekman, J.; Fahlander, C.; Rudolph, D. Mirror symmetry in the upper fp shell. Mod. Phys. Lett. 2005, 20, 2977–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bentley, M.A.; Lenzi, S.M.; Simpson, S.A.; Diget, C.A. Isospin-breaking interactions studied through mirror energy differences. Phys. Rev. C 2015, 92, 024310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bonnard, J.; Lenzi, S.M.; Zuker, A.P. Neutron skins and halo orbits in the sd and pf shells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 212501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fernández, A.; Jungclaus, A.; Doornenbal, P.; Bentley, M.A.; Lenzi, S.M.; Rudolph, D.; Browne, F.; Cort’es, M.L.; Koiwai, T.; Taniuchi, R.; et al. First γ-ray spectroscopy of the Tz = −2 nucleus 56Zn. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 823, 136784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bentley, M.A. Excited States in Isobaric Multiplets—Experimental Advances and the Shell-Model Approach. Physics 2022, 4, 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smirnova, N.A. Isospin-Symmetry Breaking within the Nuclear Shell Model: Present Status and Developments. Physics 2023, 5, 352–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jackson, K.P.; Cardinal, C.U.; Evans, H.C.; Jelley, N.A.; Cerny, J. 53Com: A proton-unstable isomer. Phys. Lett. B 1970, 33, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cerny, J.; Esterl, J.E.; Gough, R.A.; Sextro, R.G. Confirmed proton radioactivity of 53Com. Phys. Lett. B 1970, 33, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sarmiento, L.G.; Sarmiento, L.G.; Roger, T.; Giovinazzo, J.; Brown, B.A.; Blank, B.; Rudolph, D.; Kankainen, A.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Arokia Raj, A.; et al. Elucidating the nature of the proton radioactivity of 53mCo. Nat. Commun. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Giovinazzo, J.; Roger, T.; Blank, B.; Rudolph, D.; Brown, B.A.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Arokia Raj, A.; Ascher, P.; Caamaño-Fresco, M.; Caceres, L.; et al. 4D-imaging of drip-line radioactivity by detecting proton emission from 54mNi pictured with ACTAR TPC. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4805–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Giovinazzo, J.; Giovinazzo, J.; Roger, T.; Blank, B.; Rudolph, D.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Arokiaraj, A.; Ascher, P.; Caamaño-Fresco, M.; Caceres, L.; et al. Proton 3D tracking and emission time from a short-lived isomer with ACTAR-TPC. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 2022, 1042, 167447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rudolph, D.; Blank, B.; Giovinazzo, J.; Roger, T.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Arokia Raj, A.; Ascher, P.; Caamaño-Fresco, M.; Caceres, L.; Cox, D.M.; et al. Mirror symmetry at mass A = 54: E4 effective charges near doubly magic 56Ni. Phys. Lett. B 2022, 830, 137144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Palazzo, T.; Mitchell, A.J.; Lane, G.J.; Stuchbery, A.E.; Brown, B.A.; Reed, M.W.; Akber, A.; Coombes, B.J.; Dowie, J.T.H.; Eriksen, T.K.; et al. Direct Measurement of Hexacontatetrapole, E6 γ Decay from 53mFe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 122503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, D.; Huo, J. Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 54. Nucl. Data Sheets 2014, 121, 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dafni, E.; Noé, J.W.; Rafailovich, M.H.; Sprouse, G.D. Static moments of 54Fem and perturbed angular distributions with combined dipole and quadrupole interactions. Phys. Lett. B 1978, 76, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rudolph, D.; Ragnarsson, I.; Andreoiu, C.; Bentley, M.A.; Carpenter, M.P.; Charity, R.J.; Clark, R.M.; Ekman, J.; Fahlander, C.; Fallon, P.; et al. Single-particle and collective excitations in the N = 28 isotones 54Fe and 53Mn. Phys. Rev. C 2020, 102, 014316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, I.-Y. The Gammasphere. Nucl. Phys. A 1990, 520, 641c–655c. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarantites, D.G.; Reviol, W.; Chiara, C.J.; Charity, R.J.; Sobotka, L.G.; Devlin, M.; Furlotti, M.; Pechenaya, O.L.; Elson, J.; Hausladen, P.; et al. “Neutron Shell”: A high efficiency array of neutron detectors for γ-ray spectroscopic studies with Gammasphere. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 2004, 530, 473–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sarantites, D.G.; Hua, P.-F.; Devlin, M.; Sobotka, L.G.; Elson, J.; Hood, J.T.; LaFosse, D.R.; Sarantites, J.E.; Maier, M.R. “The Microball”: Design, instrumentation and response characteristics of a 4π-multidetector exit channel-selection device for spectroscopic and reaction mechanism studies with Gammasphere. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 1996, 381, 418–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davids, C.N.; Larson, J.D. The Argonne fragment mass analyzer. Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 1989, 40–41, 1224–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Farghaly, D. Nuclear Structure Near the Proton Drip-Line: A Search for Excited States in 62Ge. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2022. Available online: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9085097 (accessed on 25 July 2023).
  23. Böhm, P. Optimization of Gammasphere Data Following the Nuclear Reaction 36Ar + 24Mg→60Zn. Bachelor’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2023. Available online: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9117612. (accessed on 25 July 2023).
  24. du Rietz, R.; Ekman, J.; Rudolph, D.; Fahlander, C.; Dewald, A.; Möller, O.; Saha, B.; Axiotis, M.; Bentley, M.A.; Chandler, C.; et al. Effective charges in the fp shell. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 222501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Partial decay scheme of 54 Fe [15,17] relevant for the present study. Energy labels are in keV. The thickness of the arrows scales with the relative intensities of the γ rays. Those with the thinnest arrows are not observed in the present study and are only shown for completeness. The 10 + isomeric state as well as the 10 + 8 + 146-keV transition, which was used to select its decay paths, are shown in blue. Known transitions populating the isomer are indicated in gray. Previously unknown transitions connecting the 6380-keV 8 + state with side branches are marked green.
Figure 1. Partial decay scheme of 54 Fe [15,17] relevant for the present study. Energy labels are in keV. The thickness of the arrows scales with the relative intensities of the γ rays. Those with the thinnest arrows are not observed in the present study and are only shown for completeness. The 10 + isomeric state as well as the 10 + 8 + 146-keV transition, which was used to select its decay paths, are shown in blue. Known transitions populating the isomer are indicated in gray. Previously unknown transitions connecting the 6380-keV 8 + state with side branches are marked green.
Atoms 11 00116 g001
Figure 2. Gamma-ray spectra in prompt coincidence with the 146-keV transition depopulating the 10 + isomer in 54 Fe. Energy labels are in keV (cf. Figure 1 and text). (a) Spectra in prompt coincidence, Δ t = [ 20 , 60 ] ns (blue, thick lines), or selecting Δ t = [ 0.15 , 2.00 ]   μ s (gray, thin lines), i.e., providing Doppler-shifted peak structures of transitions feeding the isomer. (b) Summed spectrum in coincidence with the three transitions forming the 6 + 4 + 2 + 0 + yrast cascade. (c) Summed spectrum in coincidence with the 737, 757, and 1249-keV transitions. (d) Spectrum in coincidence with the previously unobserved 1336-keV transition.
Figure 2. Gamma-ray spectra in prompt coincidence with the 146-keV transition depopulating the 10 + isomer in 54 Fe. Energy labels are in keV (cf. Figure 1 and text). (a) Spectra in prompt coincidence, Δ t = [ 20 , 60 ] ns (blue, thick lines), or selecting Δ t = [ 0.15 , 2.00 ]   μ s (gray, thin lines), i.e., providing Doppler-shifted peak structures of transitions feeding the isomer. (b) Summed spectrum in coincidence with the three transitions forming the 6 + 4 + 2 + 0 + yrast cascade. (c) Summed spectrum in coincidence with the 737, 757, and 1249-keV transitions. (d) Spectrum in coincidence with the previously unobserved 1336-keV transition.
Atoms 11 00116 g002
Table 1. Comparison of experimental results with predictions from shell-model calculations. See text for details. Level energies, E x , and spin-parity assignments, I π , are taken from Ref. [17]. Transition energies, E γ and relative branching ratios, b γ , are from the present study.
Table 1. Comparison of experimental results with predictions from shell-model calculations. See text for details. Level energies, E x , and spin-parity assignments, I π , are taken from Ref. [17]. Transition energies, E γ and relative branching ratios, b γ , are from the present study.
E x , i (keV) I i π () E γ (keV) E x , f (keV) I f π () b γ , exp (‰) b γ , theo (‰)
6380 8 1 + 80.3(11) 16300 7 2 + <10.1
452.6(5)5928 7 1 + 3.1(4)2.5
496.0(17) 15884 6 5 + <10.0
898.6(11) 15482 6 4 + <20.2
1099.9(7)5280 6 3 + 2.5(5)7.3
1335.6(10)5046 6 2 + 1.3(5)6.0
3431.6(8)2948 6 1 + 10001000
2948 6 1 + 411.3(2)2537 4 1 + 10001000
1539.7(10)1408 2 1 + <1 4 · 10 5
1 Energy difference calculated using excitation energies listed in Ref. [17].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Böhm, P.; Hrabar, Y.; Rudolph, D.; Golubev, P.; Sarmiento, L.G.; Albers, H.M.; Anderson, J.T.; Bentley, M.A.; Carpenter, M.P.; Chiara, C.J.; et al. Search for Weak Side Branches in the Electromagnetic Decay Paths of the 6526-keV 10+ Isomer in 54Fe. Atoms 2023, 11, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11090116

AMA Style

Böhm P, Hrabar Y, Rudolph D, Golubev P, Sarmiento LG, Albers HM, Anderson JT, Bentley MA, Carpenter MP, Chiara CJ, et al. Search for Weak Side Branches in the Electromagnetic Decay Paths of the 6526-keV 10+ Isomer in 54Fe. Atoms. 2023; 11(9):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11090116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Böhm, Paul, Yuliia Hrabar, Dirk Rudolph, Pavel Golubev, Luis G. Sarmiento, Helena M. Albers, John T. Anderson, Michael A. Bentley, Michael P. Carpenter, Christopher J. Chiara, and et al. 2023. "Search for Weak Side Branches in the Electromagnetic Decay Paths of the 6526-keV 10+ Isomer in 54Fe" Atoms 11, no. 9: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11090116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop