Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Strengthening Industrial Ecology’s Links with Business Studies: Insights and Potential Contributions from the Innovation and Business Models Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Global Patterns of Material Flows and their Socio-Economic and Environmental Implications: A MFA Study on All Countries World-Wide from 1980 to 2009
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recycling Potentials of Critical Metals-Analyzing Secondary Flows from Selected Applications
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Resources 2014, 3(2), 340-361; doi:10.3390/resources3020340

The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers

1
Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
2
Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
3
Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia
4
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Future Manufacturing Flagship, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 December 2013 / Revised: 12 February 2014 / Accepted: 12 March 2014 / Published: 25 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wealth from Waste: Urban Metal Resources and Industrial Ecology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [268 KB, uploaded 25 March 2014]

Abstract

Drawing on current international industrial ecology thinking and experiences with Australian initiatives, this article critically overviews the current status of industrial ecology in Australia and examines the barriers and potential strategies to realise greater uptake and application of the concept. The analysis is conducted across three categories: heavy industrial areas (including Kwinana and Gladstone), mixed industrial parks (Wagga Wagga and Port Melbourne), and waste exchange networks, and identifies the past and future significance of seven different types of barriers—regulation, information, community, economic, technical, cooperation and trust, commitment to sustainable development—for each of the three categories. The outcomes from this analysis highlight that regulation, information, and economic barriers for heavy industrial area and mixed industrial parks, and economic and technical barriers for waste exchange networks are the current and future focus for industrial ecology applications in Australia. These findings appear to be consistent with recently published frameworks and learnings. The authors propose key questions that could enhance greater adoption of industrial ecology applications in Australia and acknowledge that international research and experiences, while partly providing answers to these questions, need to be adapted and refined for the Australian context. View Full-Text
Keywords: industrial ecology; industrial symbiosis; recycling; waste exchange; industrial parks; by-products; barriers industrial ecology; industrial symbiosis; recycling; waste exchange; industrial parks; by-products; barriers
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Corder, G.D.; Golev, A.; Fyfe, J.; King, S. The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers. Resources 2014, 3, 340-361.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top