Next Article in Journal
A Systems-Based Framework for Design and Analysis of an R and D Structure
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Identification of Sustainability Key Factors Based on Capturing Dominant Feedbacks of Behavioural Stereotypes in Socio-Economic Systems
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Systems 2017, 5(3), 43; doi:10.3390/systems5030043

Examining the Use of Systemic Approach for Adoption of Systems Thinking in Organizations

1
Vemuri Consultants Private Limited, Padmavathinagar, Khairtabad Hyderabad 500004, India
2
Systems Thinking World Inc., Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948, USA
This author has been deceased.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 April 2017 / Revised: 21 June 2017 / Accepted: 22 June 2017 / Published: 28 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leadership for Sustainable Socio-Ecological Systems)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [594 KB, uploaded 28 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

The need for systems thinking (ST) in organizations is being increasingly felt, and sustained effort towards nurturing ST in organizations is still rare. Some companies that tried it earlier were not so successful. One of the reasons for this problem is that the implementation is done more with a reductionist mindset rather than a systemic mindset. It is no doubt challenging for managers so accustomed to reductionist thinking to cultivate the habits of systems thinking. This paper examines the use of a systemic approach for the successful adoption of systems thinking in organizations. The systemic approach needs a good system model for the systematic guidance of the implementation. The systemic model used in this study is a spirit, mind, and body model (SMB)—a holistic model taken from the spiritual lore which emphasizes the need for the alignment of spirit, mind, and body in order to achieve human excellence. We extended this model for use in an organizational context, and defined the systems of the spirit, systems of the mind, and systems of the body for an organization. Systems of the spirit are related to the leadership system, systems of the mind to the learning and change management systems, and systems of the body to the supporting systems such as tools and technology. We used such a model earlier to explain the suboptimal results in the implementation of capability maturity models (CMM) in software companies in India. In this paper, we used this model to explain the rather unsatisfactory results in the implementation of ST in companies like Ford and the satisfactory results in the implementation of “work out” at GE. “Work out” is a five-step process in which ST is a prominent step. We argued whether “work out” can be a good warm-up step that can prepare the organization for successful ST implementation. The study shows that the SMB framework is helpful in conducting an intelligent discourse about the implementation of ST-like initiatives in companies and has excellent potential for use as a guide for ST implementation in organizations. View Full-Text
Keywords: leadership; systems thinking; reductionist thinking; adoption; systems of spirit; systems of mind; systems of body; learning levels; change management leadership; systems thinking; reductionist thinking; adoption; systems of spirit; systems of mind; systems of body; learning levels; change management
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vemuri, P.; Bellinger, G. Examining the Use of Systemic Approach for Adoption of Systems Thinking in Organizations. Systems 2017, 5, 43.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Systems EISSN 2079-8954 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top