Next Article in Journal
Advances and Applications of Carbon Nanotubes
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Evidence of Dynamic Metal Support Interactions in Co/TiO2 Catalysts by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Performance of GaAs Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors Using a TaON/GeON Dual Interlayer

School of Integrated Circuits, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(19), 2673; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192673
Submission received: 28 August 2023 / Revised: 26 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023

Abstract

:
In this work, a dual interfacial passivation layer (IPL) consisting of TaON/GeON is implemented in GaAs metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) capacitors with ZrTaON as a high-k layer to obtain superior interfacial and electrical properties. As compared to the samples with only GeON IPL or no IPL, the sample with the dual IPL of TaON/GeON exhibits the best performance: low interface-state density (1.31 × 1012 cm−2 eV−1), small gate leakage current density (1.62 × 10−5 A cm−2 at Vfb + 1 V) and large equivalent dielectric constant (18.0). These exceptional results can be attributed to the effective blocking action of the TaON/GeON dual IPL. It efficiently prevents the out-diffusion of Ga/As atoms and the in-diffusion of oxygen, thereby safeguarding the gate stack against degradation. Additionally, the insertion of the thin TaON layer successfully hinders the interdiffusion of Zr/Ge atoms, thus averting any reaction between Zr and Ge. Consequently, the occurrence of defects in the gate stack and at/near the GaAs surface is significantly reduced.

1. Introduction

Recently, as Si-based CMOS technology is approaching its fundamental limit, high- mobility semiconductors such as Ge or Ⅲ-Ⅴ compound semiconductors have become inevitable for future CMOS technology development [1,2]. Among them, the GaAs-based MOS device has been considered as the most viable candidate due to its higher mobility, higher breakdown voltage, and larger band gap than Si [3]. Meanwhile, many high-k materials, e.g., HfO2 [4], TiO2 [5], La2O3 [6], Y2O3 [7], etc., have been introduced into GaAs-based MOS devices for the scaling down of the device dimension. However, since GaAs easily forms oxides of Ga and As that create interface defects and contain border traps, high interface-state density (Dit) at the interface of high-k/GaAs is generated, leading to the degradation of device performance [8]. In order to passivate the surface of GaAs, various wet chemical surface treatments have been studied. Sulfide passivation using (NH4)2S, for example, has been proven to be effective in removing the native oxide and elemental arsenic from the surface of GaAs by creating an S termination. But this termination tends to be unstable when exposed to air or water and thus it has to be protected by a dielectric layer [9]. Additionally, prior research has confirmed that the intrinsic oxides on the GaAs surface can be removed effectively using silicon nitride (SixNy) or Al2O3. However, these methods inevitably lead to a low-k interfacial layer between the GaAs substrate and the high-k gate dielectric, which are unfavorable for decreasing the equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) and improving the dielectric constant [10,11]. Among these high-k materials, Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) has a high k value (~24) and a large bandgap (5.8 eV) [12], and has been used as a high-k gate dielectric for GaAs MOS devices with good electrical properties [13,14,15]. However, the low crystallization temperature (400–500 °C) of ZrO2 may facilitate its crystallization [16,17], thereby increasing the gate leakage current [17,18]. Fortunately, doping Ta into ZrO2 can improve its crystallinity, and the high k value (~25) of Ta oxide can maintain a high dielectric constant for the novel binary oxide [19]. In addition, incorporating nitrogen into the oxide can usually increase the k value, reduce gate leakage current, passivate oxygen vacancies, and form strong N-related bonds at/near the dielectric/semiconductor interface to further enhance the thermal stability and reliability of the devices [20,21]. Therefore, in this work, Ta-doped Zr-oxynitride (ZrTaON) will be employed as a high-k gate dielectric to fabricate GaAs MOS devices. Further, in order to improve the interfacial properties of the devices, an interfacial passivation layer (IPL) is typically implemented prior to depositing the high-k layer [6,14,20]. Due to the excellent crystallographic matching between germanium (Ge) and GaAs (the lattice constant is 5.653 Å for GaAs and 5.658 Å for Ge [22]) and the passivation effect on the defect-related Ga/As-O or As-As bonds, Ge could be regarded as a promising IPL material for GaAs MOS devices. However, Ge is an amphoteric dopant for GaAs, which may alter the doping concentration or even induce the counterdoping of the GaAs substrate when using it as IPL [23]. So, Ge oxynitride (GeON) will be used as an IPL instead of Ge. Furthermore, to avoid the reaction between Zr (from ZrTaON) and Ge (from GeON) that can degrade the quality of the gate stack [24], a thin TaON film, which can strongly block interdiffusion of elements, is inserted between the GeON IPL and high-k layer. As a result, the GaAs MOS capacitor with ZrTaON as the high-k gate dielectric and TaON/GeON as the dual IPL is proposed and fabricated, and excellent interfacial and electrical properties are achieved for the device.

2. Experiments

N-GaAs (100) wafers with a resistivity of 0.002–0.005 Ωcm were employed to fabricate the MOS capacitors. The wafers were firstly degreased in acetone, ethanol, and isopropanol, and then dipped in diluted HCl to remove the native oxides. This was followed by (NH4)2S dipping for 40 min at room temperature for surface sulfur passivation, and finally rinsing in de-ionized water for several times [25]. After drying with N2, the wafers were divided into different samples that were fabricated with different gate stacks: (1) the sample would receive ~1 nm GeN and then ~1 nm TaN as the dual IPL by sputtering Ge (RF) and Ta (DC) targets, respectively, followed by depositing ~8 nm ZrTaN as the high-k layer via co-sputtering Zr (RF) and Ta (DC) targets (TaON/GeON sample); (2) the sample would receive ~2 nm GeN (IPL) and then ~8 nm ZrTaN (high-k layer) (GeON sample); (3) the sample would only receive ~10 nm ZrTaN film as the high-k layer (control sample). The cross-section diagrams of the three samples are shown in Figure 1, respectively. The sputtering was performed in an ambient of Ar:N2 = 24 sccm: 12 sccm at room temperature (RT) using a Denton Vacuum Discovery Deposition System. Subsequently, these samples were annealed at 600 °C for 60 s in an atmosphere of N2 (500 sccm) + O2 (50 sccm) to form the ultimate oxynitrides. Finally, Al was thermally evaporated and patterned by photolithography as the gate electrode (7.85 × 10−5 cm2) and also as back electrode, followed by forming-gas (5% H2 + 95% N2) annealing at 300 °C for 20 min to reduce the contact resistance [25].
The capacitance–voltage (C-V) and Jg-Vg curves (Jg is the gate leakage current density and Vg is the gate voltage) were measured using an Agilent 4284A precision LCR meter and a Keithley 4200-SCS semiconductor characterization system from the United States, respectively. The XPS method was used to analyze chemical states at/near the gate dielectric/GaAs interface using a XPS equipment with a type of VG Multilab 2000 produced by Thermo Fisher in the United States. The physical thickness of the gate dielectric was determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry produced by J. A. Woollam in the United States. All measurements were performed in a dark environment with electromagnetic shielding at RT.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the typical HF (1-MHz) C-V curves of the three samples, swept in two directions (from inversion to accumulation and back). It is evident that compared to the control sample, the GeON sample and especially the TaON/GeON sample display significantly improved electrical characteristics with reduced “stretch-out” and a more saturated accumulation region, indicating an improved high-k/GaAs interface with fewer defect-related Ga/As-O and As-As bonds (as confirmed by the XPS analyses below) [6,20]. Also, the accumulation capacitance for the TaON/GeON and GeON samples is much larger than that of the control sample, which should be attributed to the reduced low-k Ga/As oxides on the GaAs surface for the two samples [6]. The largest accumulation capacitance for the TaON/GeON sample can be attributed to the least interfacial Ga/As oxides and the much larger k value of TaON compared to GeON, which results in the largest equivalent k value (18) and the smallest capacitance equivalent thickness (CET = ε0kSiO2/Cox = 2.17 nm, where kSiO2 is the relative permittivity of SiO2) for the stacked gate dielectric, as summarized in Table 1. The hysteresis voltages (ΔVfb) obtained from the HF C-V measurements are found to be 60 mV, 70 mV, and 130 mV for the TaON/GeON, GeON, and control samples, respectively. These results suggest that the TaON/GeON sample exhibits the least pronounced slow states, primarily located in the IPL and near/at the IPL/GaAs interface. The enhanced electrical properties observed in the GeON sample can be attributed to the inhibitory role of the GeON IPL, which prevents the out-diffusion of Ga/As atoms and the in-diffusion of oxygen. Consequently, the GaAs surface is protected from oxidation, preserving the quality of the interface. Furthermore, the insertion of a 1 nm TaON layer between the high-k layer of ZrTaON and the GeON IPL is proved to be effective in preventing the reaction between Zr and Ge by blocking the interdiffusion of Zr/Ge atoms [24]. This additional layer contributes to the maintenance of the good quality of the GeON IPL and further reduces defects near/at the GeON/GaAs interface. As a result, it enables the achievement of optimal interfacial properties for the TaON/GeON sample.
Some other physical and electrical parameters of the capacitors can also be extracted from the HF C-V curves of the three samples, like oxide capacitance on unit area (Cox), flat-band voltage (Vfb), equivalent density of oxide charges (Qox), equivalent gate dielectric k value (k = Cox·Tox/ε0; Tox is the total gate dielectric thickness; ε0 is the vacuum dielectric constant), and density of interface states (Dit) evaluated by Terman’s method [26], as listed in Table 1. The samples with IPL exhibit much lower Dit than the sample without IPL (the control sample), implying a great passivation effect of the GeON IPL, especially the TaON/GeON dual IPL. Also, the positive Vfb shows the presence of negative oxide charge (Qox) in the gate stack, and the smallest Vfb (0.70 V) for the TaON/GeON sample indicates the least Qox in the gate stack and thus the best quality of the gate dielectric, due to less Ga/As out-diffusion and a reduced reaction between Zr and Ge, as mentioned above.
Figure 3 shows the frequency dispersion of the three samples measured at different frequencies. Clearly, the control and GeON samples show a large dispersion behavior in both the depletion and accumulation regions, which is probably due to the effects of the interface traps [27,28] and the border traps in the gate dielectric near the interface [29], respectively. Fortunately, using the dual IPL of TaON/GeON can effectively prevent the reaction between Zr and Ge to maintain the good quality of the GeON IPL and achieve an excellent passivation effect on the GaAs surface, thus largely reducing the interface traps and leading to much improved frequency dispersion properties, as shown in Figure 3.
The gate leakage properties (Jg vs. Vg) of the three samples are shown in Figure 4. The control sample exhibits much worse gate leakage properties than the GeON and especially TaON/GeON samples; at Vfb + 1 V, the gate leakage current is 5.88 × 10−3 A/cm2, 4.39 × 10−5 A/cm2, and 2.23 × 10−5 A/cm2 for the control, GeON, and GeON/TaON samples, respectively. The large gate leakage current for the control sample should originate from the strong trap-assisted tunneling of carriers by the traps in the gate dielectric and at the high-k/GaAs interface, associated with its large Qox and Dit values, as listed in Table 1. Also, the reduction of the conduction-band offset induced by the much Ga/As oxides at the interface may be another reason [27]. For the TaON/GeON sample, however, the smallest gate leakage current is obtained due to the largely improved gate stack quality and interface properties by the dual IPL of TaON/GeON.
To confirm the above discussion, XPS analyses were carried out for the three samples to investigate the interfacial chemical states between the high-k dielectric and GaAs substrate. For this purpose, the thickness of the gate dielectric layer is thinned to ~3 nm from the GaAs surface by using an in situ Ar+ ion beam. The energy scale of the three samples is calibrated by fixing the C 1s at a binding energy (BE) of 285 eV to eliminate the charging effect. The Zr 3d spectra for the three samples are shown in Figure 5, indicating the presence of Zr in the gate stack. Also, the presence of N and O can be confirmed by the O 1s and N 1s spectra in the insets of Figure 5. In Figure 6, showing the Ta 4f spectra for the three samples, the two peaks at 26.51 eV and 28.36 eV originated from Ta2O5, respectively, and the two peaks at 24.65 V and 26.50 eV should originate from TaO2 [30], demonstrating the existence of Ta oxides in the IPL and near the GaAs surface. These results confirm the formation of the ZrTaON high-k layer. Obviously, in Figure 6, the peak intensity of TaO2 for the TaON/GeON sample is stronger than that for the other two samples due to presence of the 1 nm TaON interlayer. Especially, in Figure 6, a Ge 3d peak can be found for the TaON/GeON and GeON samples, indicating the presence of Ge on the GaAs surface. The stronger Ge 3d peak for the GeON sample than the TaON/GeON sample should be due to the thicker GeON IPL for the former (~2 nm) compared to the latter (~1 nm). In Figure 6a, showing the TaON/GeON sample, the Ge 3d peak is located at 30.25 eV, which should be assigned to GeOxNy [31]; however, the Ge 3d peak in Figure 6b, showing the GeON sample, has a positive shift of ~0.85 eV. Similarly, the Zr 3d spectrum for the GeON sample in Figure 5 also has a slight shift to higher energy as compared to the other two samples. These are associated with the reaction between Zr and Ge in the gate stack to form ZrGeON [24], which would degrade the gate stack quality and thus the electrical properties of the devices. However, the reaction between Zr and Ge has been greatly suppressed for the TaON/GeON sample, which can be attributed to the strong blocking role of the 1 nm TaON IPL against the interdiffusion of the Zr and Ge atoms, thus avoiding the degradation of the gate stack and maintaining the excellent interface quality and electrical properties.
The high Dit observed on the GaAs surface can primarily be attributed to the presence of native oxides of Ga and As. Additionally, another potential source of Dit is arsenic, which can exist in the form of dimers or as elemental arsenic. Arsenic dimers are commonly found in various surface reconstructions of GaAs, whereas elemental arsenic may result from preferential oxidation of Ga and the instability of As2O3 on the GaAs surface, as described by the chemical reaction [10]: As2O3 + 2GaAs → 4As + Ga2O3. The As 2p3/2 and Ga 3d spectra of the samples are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively, where the As-S, Ga-S, and Ga-N peaks can be found due to the sulfur passivation by the (NH4)2S dipping and the nitridation induced by sputtering in an N2-contained ambient. In Figure 7, an As-O peak can be found at 1326.2 eV for the three samples, and in Figure 8, all three samples exhibit a Ga-O peak at 21.1 eV, indicating the oxidation of the GaAs surface. As compared to the control sample, the As/Ga-O peaks and the As-As peaks are weakened for the GeON sample and especially for TaON/GeON sample, implying that the formation of low-k native oxides on the GaAs surface and arsenic dimers is effectively suppressed by GeON IPL, especially by the dual IPL of TaON/GeON, due to its strong blocking role against O in-diffusion toward the GaAs substrate and the reduced reaction between Zr and Ge in the gate stack. The strong As/Ga-O peaks and As-As peaks of the control sample in its As 2p3/2 and Ga 3d spectra (Figure 7c and Figure 8c) indicate a large amount of low-k Ga/As-oxides and arsenic dimers on the GaAs surface, leading to a much smaller accumulation capacitance in Figure 2 and a high Dit. In addition, the weakest As-As peak is also observed in Figure 7 for the TaON/GeON sample, suggesting the suppressed formation of the As-As bonds on the GaAs surface. It is well known that the Ga/As-O and As-As bonds are closely related to the defects at/near the surface, and so it can be concluded that the use of the TaON/GeON dual IPL can effectively reduce the defects at/near the GaAs surface, thus leading to much improved electrical properties of the devices, as described above.
A comprehensive comparison of the electrical and physical properties between the samples presented in this study and other existing solutions in the literature is provided in Table 2. The results clearly demonstrate that this work yields the smallest flat-band voltage and a Dit value that is comparable to, and in some cases even lower than, those reported in the literature. Notably, these superior outcomes are particularly pronounced for the samples exhibiting high k values (exceeding 18).

4. Conclusions

The GaAs MOS capacitors with GeON IPL or TaON/GeON dual IPL are fabricated and their interfacial and electrical properties are investigated. A comparison is made with a control sample lacking any IPL. The results demonstrate that the inclusion of the GeON IPL, and particularly the TaON/GeON dual IPL, effectively impedes the out-diffusion of Ga/As atoms and the in-diffusion of oxygen. Consequently, it provides protection against oxidation of the GaAs surface. Inserting a thin TaON layer between the high-k ZrTaON layer and the GeON IPL is proved to be even more effective in blocking Ga/As out-diffusion and oxygen in-diffusion. Simultaneously, it efficiently suppresses the reaction between Zr and Ge by preventing the interdiffusion of Zr/Ge atoms. As a result, defects near/at the GaAs surface are further reduced, preserving the quality of the stacked gate and avoiding its degradation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the utilization of the TaON/GeON dual IPL can lead to improved gate stack quality and interfacial properties. Consequently, it yields excellent electrical properties for GaAs MOS devices.

Author Contributions

Investigation, L.L.; Formal analysis, W.L.; Data curation, F.L.; Writing-review & editing, J.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 92264107 and 61176100).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor Industry Association. 2015. Available online: http://www.public.itrs.net (accessed on 5 June 2015).
  2. Oktyabrsky, S.; Peide, D.Y. Fundamentals of III–V Semiconductor MOSFETs; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Del Alamo, J.A. Nanometre-scale electronics with III–V compound semiconductors. Nature 2011, 479, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.M.; Lv, H.L. Effect of atomic layer deposition growth temperature on the interfacial characteristics of HfO2/p-GaAs metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 222207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yen, C.; Lee, M. Low equivalent oxide thickness of TiO2/GaAs MOS capacitor. Solid State Electron. 2012, 73, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das, T.; Mahata, C.; Maiti, C.K.; Dalapati, G.K.; Chia, C.K.; Chi, D.Z.; Chiam, S.Y.; Seng, H.L.; Tan, C.C.; Hui, H.K.; et al. Sputter-Deposited La2O3 on p-GaAs for Gate Dielectric Applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, G15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, W.-S.; Lin, K.-Y.; Lin, Y.-H.G.; Wan, H.-W.; Young, L.B.; Cheng, C.-P.; Pi, T.-W.; Kwo, J.; Hong, M. Ultrahigh Vacuum Annealing of Atomic-Layer-Deposited Y2O3/GaAs in Perfecting Hetero-structural Chemical Bonding for Effective Passivation. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5, 3809–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasegawa, H.; Akazawa, M.; Domanowska, A.; Adamowicz, B. Surface passivation of III-V semiconductors for future CMOS device-past research, present status and key issues for future. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 5698–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. O’Connor, E.; Brennan, B.; Djara, V.; Cherkaoui, K.; Monaghan, S.; Newcomb, S.B.; Contreras, R.; Milojevic, M.; Hughes, G.; Pemble, M.E.; et al. A systematic study of (NH4)2S passivation (22%, 10%, 5%, or 1%) on the interface properties of Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As/InP system for n-type and p-type In0.53Ga0.47As epitaxial layers. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 024101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Richard, O.; Blais, S.; Ares, R.; Aimez, V.; Jaouad, A. Mechanisms of GaAs surface passivation by a one-step dry process using low-frequency plasma enhanced chemical deposition of silicon nitride. Microelectron. Eng. 2020, 233, 111398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, M.; Tung, C.H.; Yeo, Y.C. Aluminum oxynitride interfacial passivation layer for high-permittivity gate dielectric stack on gallium arsenide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 202903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Robertson, J.; Falabretti, B. Band offsets of high k gate oxides on III–V semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 014111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kundu, S.; Roy, S.; Banerji, P.; Chakraborty, S.; Shripathi, T. Studies on Al/ZrO2/GaAs metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors and determination of its electrical parameters in the frequency range of 10 kHz~1 MHz. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. 2011, 29, 031203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dalapati, G.K.; Sridhara, A.; Wong, A.S.W.; Chia, C.K.; Lee, S.J.; Chi, D. Interfacial characteristics and band alignments for ZrO2 gate dielectric on Si passivated p-GaAs substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 242101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Konda, R.B.; White, C.; Thomas, D.; Yang, Q.; Pradhan, A.K. Electrical characteristics of ZrO2/GaAs MOS capacitor fabricated by atomic layer deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2013, 31, 041505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaskell, J.M.; Jones, A.C.; Aspinall, H.C.; Taylor, S.; Taechakumput, P.; Chalker, P.R.; Heys, P.N.; Odedra, R. Deposition of lanthanum zirconium oxide high-κfilms by liquid injection atomic layer deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 112912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Juan, P.; Chou, Y.; Hsu, H. The effect of lanthanum (La) incorporation in ultra-thin ZrO2 high-κ gate dielectrics. Microelectron. Eng. 2012, 89, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeon, S.; Choi, C.; Seong, T.; Hwang, H. Electrical characteristics of ZrOxNy prepared by NH3 annealing of ZrO2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, X.; Maruyama, K.; Ishiwara, H. Characterization of HfTaO films for gate oxide and metal-ferroelectric-insulator-silicon device applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 044105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Liu, L.; Tang, W.; Lai, P. Nitrided HfTiON/Ga2O3(Gd2O3) as stacked gate dielectric for GaAs MOS applications. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 61201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.; Wu, M.; Wu, J.; Lin, Y. Electrical characteristics of Ge MOS device on Si substrate with thermal SiON as gate dielectric. Microelectron. Eng. 2010, 87, 2423–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aoki, T.; Fukuhara, N.; Osada, T.; Sazawa, H.; Hata, M.; Inoue, T. Nitride passivation reduces interfacial traps in atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3/GaAs (001) metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors using atmospheric metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 033513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, F.; Lee, S.J.; Chi, D.Z.; Balakumar, S.; Kwong, D. GaAs metal-oxide-semiconductor device with HfO2/TaN gate stack and thermal nitridation surface passivation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 252904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bethge, O.; Henkel, C.; Abermann, S.; Pozzovivo, G.; Stoeger-Pollach, M.; Werner, W.S.M.; Smoliner, J.; Bertagnolli, E. Stability of La2O3 and GeO2 passivated Ge surfaces during ALD of ZrO2 high-k dielectric. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 3444–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, H.H.; Liu, L.; Xu, J.P.; Lai, P.T.; Tang, W.M. Electrical and Interfacial Properties of GaAs MOS Capacitors with La-Doped ZrON as Interfacial Passivation Layer. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 2179–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Terman, I.M. An investigation of surface states at a silicon/silicon oxide interface employing metal-oxide-silicon diodes. Solid State Electron. 1962, 5, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dalapati, G.K.; Tong, Y.; Loh, W.-Y.; Mun, H.K.; Cho, B.J. Electrical and Interfacial Characterization of Atomic Layer Deposited High-k Gate Dielectrics on GaAs for Advanced CMOS Devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2007, 54, 1831–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, R.; Yu, M.; Lai, M.Y.; Chan, L.; Zhu, C. High-k gate stack on germanium substrate with fluorine incorporation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 163505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, B.; Shin, B.; Ahn, J.; McIntyre, P.C.; Asbeck, P.M.; Rodwell, M.J.W.; Taur, Y. A Distributed Model for Border Traps in Al2O3-InGaAs MOS Devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2011, 32, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grilli, R.; Simpson, R.; Mallinson, C.F.; Baker, M.A. Comparison of Ar+ Monoatomic and Cluster Ion Sputtering of Ta2O5 at Different Ion Energies, by XPS: Part 1—Monoatomic Ions. Surf. Sci. Spectra 2014, 21, 50–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, M.; Lan, C.; Chen, C.; Wu, J. Electrical properties of HfO2/La2O3 gate dielectrics on Ge with ultrathin nitride interfacial layer formed byin situ N2/H2/Ar radical pretreatment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 182105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The cross-section diagrams for the three samples: (a) TaON/GeON sample, (b) GeON sample, and (c) control sample.
Figure 1. The cross-section diagrams for the three samples: (a) TaON/GeON sample, (b) GeON sample, and (c) control sample.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g001
Figure 2. HF (1-MHz) C-V curves for the three samples.
Figure 2. HF (1-MHz) C-V curves for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g002
Figure 3. Frequency dispersions of C-V curves at room temperature for the three samples.
Figure 3. Frequency dispersions of C-V curves at room temperature for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g003
Figure 4. Jg vs. Vg characteristics for the three samples.
Figure 4. Jg vs. Vg characteristics for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of Zr 3d for the three samples. The insets (a,b) are the O 1s and N 1s spectra, respectively.
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of Zr 3d for the three samples. The insets (a,b) are the O 1s and N 1s spectra, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g005
Figure 6. XPS spectra of Ta 4f for the three samples.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of Ta 4f for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g006
Figure 7. XPS spectra of As 2p3/2 for the three samples.
Figure 7. XPS spectra of As 2p3/2 for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g007
Figure 8. XPS spectra of Ga 3d for the three samples.
Figure 8. XPS spectra of Ga 3d for the three samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02673 g008
Table 1. Parameters of the GaAs MOS capacitors extracted from their HF C-V curves.
Table 1. Parameters of the GaAs MOS capacitors extracted from their HF C-V curves.
SamplesVfb
(V)
Dit
(/cm2eV)
Cox
(μF/cm2)
Qox (1012)
(/cm2)
kCET
(nm)
TaON/GeON0.701.31 × 10121.60−5.9818.02.17
GeON0.851.65 × 10121.52−7.0917.22.27
Control1.418.06 × 10120.88−7.1710.03.90
Table 2. Comparison of electrical and physical properties of the GaAs MOS devices between this work and other works in the literature.
Table 2. Comparison of electrical and physical properties of the GaAs MOS devices between this work and other works in the literature.
SamplesThis WorkY2O3/Al2O3 [7]GGO/HfTiON [20]AlN/Al2O3 [22]LaGeON/ZrON [25]
Parameters
k188.225.17.912.7
Vfb (V)0.7~1.01.28~1.00.8
Dit (cm−2 eV−1)1.3 × 10122.5 × 10123.3 × 10122 × 10121.2 × 1012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Li, W.; Li, F.; Xu, J. Enhanced Performance of GaAs Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors Using a TaON/GeON Dual Interlayer. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192673

AMA Style

Liu L, Li W, Li F, Xu J. Enhanced Performance of GaAs Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors Using a TaON/GeON Dual Interlayer. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(19):2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Lu, Wanyu Li, Fei Li, and Jingping Xu. 2023. "Enhanced Performance of GaAs Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors Using a TaON/GeON Dual Interlayer" Nanomaterials 13, no. 19: 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop