Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Response Mixture Modeling of Intraindividual Differences in Responses and Response Times to the Hungarian WISC-IV Block Design Test
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Predicting Fluid Intelligence by Components of Reaction Time Distributions from Simple Choice Reaction Time Tasks
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Intell. 2016, 4(3), 9; doi:10.3390/jintelligence4030009

The Worst Performance Rule as Moderation: New Methods for Worst Performance Analysis

Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Hauptstr. 47-51, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Oliver Wilhelm
Received: 15 March 2016 / Revised: 29 June 2016 / Accepted: 15 July 2016 / Published: 20 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Speed and Response Times in Cognitive Tests)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [353 KB, uploaded 20 July 2016]   |  

Abstract

Worst performance in cognitive processing tasks shows larger relationships to general intelligence than mean or best performance. This so called Worst Performance Rule (WPR) is of major theoretical interest for the field of intelligence research, especially for research on mental speed. In previous research, the increases in correlations between task performance and general intelligence from best to worst performance were mostly described and not tested statistically. We conceptualized the WPR as moderation, since the magnitude of the relation between general intelligence and performance in a cognitive processing task depends on the performance band or percentile of performance. On the one hand, this approach allows testing the WPR for statistical significance and on the other hand, it may simplify the investigation of possible constructs that may influence the WPR. The application of two possible implementations of this approach is shown and compared to results of a traditional worst performance analysis. The results mostly replicate the WPR. Beyond that, a comparison of results on the level of unstandardized relationships (e.g., covariances or unstandardized regression weights) to results on the level of standardized relationships (i.e., correlations) indicates that increases in the inter-individual standard deviation from best to worst performance may play a crucial role for the WPR. Altogether, conceptualizing the WPR as moderation provides a new and straightforward way to conduct Worst Performance Analysis and may help to incorporate the WPR more prominently into empirical practice of intelligence research. View Full-Text
Keywords: mental speed; worst performance rule; moderation; general intelligence mental speed; worst performance rule; moderation; general intelligence
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Frischkorn, G.T.; Schubert, A.-L.; Neubauer, A.B.; Hagemann, D. The Worst Performance Rule as Moderation: New Methods for Worst Performance Analysis. J. Intell. 2016, 4, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top