John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models
AbstractThe development of factor models is inextricably tied to the history of intelligence research. One of the most commonly-cited scholars in the field is John Carroll, whose three-stratum theory of cognitive ability has been one of the most influential models of cognitive ability in the past 20 years. Nonetheless, there is disagreement about how Carroll conceptualized the factors in his model. Some argue that his model is best represented through a higher-order model, while others argue that a bi-factor model is a better representation. Carroll was explicit about what he perceived the best way to represent his model, but his writings are not always easy to understand. In this article, I clarify his position by first describing the details and implications of bi-factor and higher-order models then show that Carroll’s published views are better represented by a bi-factor model. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Beaujean, A.A. John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models. J. Intell. 2015, 3, 121-136.
Beaujean AA. John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models. Journal of Intelligence. 2015; 3(4):121-136.Chicago/Turabian Style
Beaujean, A. A. 2015. "John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models." J. Intell. 3, no. 4: 121-136.