Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Religions 2013, 4(2), 216-229; doi:10.3390/rel4020216
Charisma and Moral Reasoning
Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, 28 Westhampton Way, Jepson Hall, Richmond, VA 23173, USA
Received: 8 March 2013; in revised form: 15 April 2013 / Accepted: 17 April 2013 / Published: 17 April 2013
Download PDF Full-Text [99 KB, uploaded 17 April 2013 14:48 CEST]
Abstract: Charisma is morally problematic insofar as it replaces followers’ capacity to engage in genuine moral reasoning. When followers defer to charismatic leaders and act in ways that are morally wrong they are not only blameworthy for wrongdoing but for failing in their deliberative obligations. Even when followers defer to charismatic leaders and do the right thing, their action is less praiseworthy to the extent that it was the result of charisma rather than moral deliberation. Therefore, effective charismatic leadership reliably undermines the praiseworthiness and amplifies the blameworthiness of follower’s actions.
Keywords: Charisma; moral reasoning; blameworthiness; leadership; followership
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
MDPI and ACS Style
Flanigan, J. Charisma and Moral Reasoning. Religions 2013, 4, 216-229.AMA Style
Flanigan J. Charisma and Moral Reasoning. Religions. 2013; 4(2):216-229.Chicago/Turabian Style
Flanigan, Jessica. 2013. "Charisma and Moral Reasoning." Religions 4, no. 2: 216-229.