Religions 2013, 4(2), 216-229; doi:10.3390/rel4020216

Charisma and Moral Reasoning

Received: 8 March 2013; in revised form: 15 April 2013 / Accepted: 17 April 2013 / Published: 17 April 2013
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Charisma is morally problematic insofar as it replaces followers’ capacity to engage in genuine moral reasoning. When followers defer to charismatic leaders and act in ways that are morally wrong they are not only blameworthy for wrongdoing but for failing in their deliberative obligations. Even when followers defer to charismatic leaders and do the right thing, their action is less praiseworthy to the extent that it was the result of charisma rather than moral deliberation. Therefore, effective charismatic leadership reliably undermines the praiseworthiness and amplifies the blameworthiness of follower’s actions.
Keywords: Charisma; moral reasoning; blameworthiness; leadership; followership
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [99 KB, uploaded 17 April 2013 14:48 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Flanigan, J. Charisma and Moral Reasoning. Religions 2013, 4, 216-229.

AMA Style

Flanigan J. Charisma and Moral Reasoning. Religions. 2013; 4(2):216-229.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flanigan, Jessica. 2013. "Charisma and Moral Reasoning." Religions 4, no. 2: 216-229.

Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert