Next Article in Journal
Biological Control Efficacy of Indigenous Antagonistic Bacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Cabbage Grown in Biofumigated Soil against Pythium aphanidermatum Damping-Off of Cucumber
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Selected Mechanical/Physical Pre-Treatments on Chlorella vulgaris Protein Solubility
Previous Article in Journal
Meat Quality of Male Layer-Type Chickens Slaughtered at Different Ages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Studies on the Impact of Selected Pretreatments on Protein Solubility of Arthrospira platensis Microalga
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of SOD-Rich Melon Supplement on Performance, Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant and Meat Quality Characteristics of Tuj Lambs

1
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars 36100, Turkey
2
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Institute of Health Sciences, Kafkas University, Kars 36000, Turkey
3
Clinic of Reproductive Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
4
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 625; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030625
Submission received: 27 December 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evaluation of Feed Additives in Animal Production)

Abstract

:
The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of SOD (superoxide dismutase)-rich melon feed supplement on some performance parameters, serum biochemical and antioxidant indexes, and meat quality characteristics of weaned Tuj lambs. An independent measures design (between groups) was used to determine these effects of treatment. After one week of the adaptation period, twenty-four weaned lambs at the age of 60 ± 5.0 days with a body weight of 23.14 ± 0.5 kg were divided into two groups, i.e., the control group (CON) fed basal diet and experimental group (EXP) fed with basal diet + SOD-rich melon (n = 12 per group). The results revealed a decrement in the (p < 0.05) feed efficiency ratio (5.88 ± 0.40 vs. 6.59 ± 0.86 kg weight gain/kg feed) and higher carcass yield (61.76 ± 0.80 vs. 60.11 ± 1.07%) in the EXP group as compared to the CON group. Additionally, the EXP group showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in serum glucose and high-density lipoprotein levels, while there was a reduction in cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein levels when compared to the CON group. The serum malondialdehyde was lowered (5.53 ± 0.47 vs. 5.98 ± 0.79 mmol/L) significantly (p < 0.05), while glutathione concentration was higher (p < 0.05) in the EXP group (17.82 ± 1.51 mmol/L) when compared to the CON group (16.54 ± 1.59 mmol/L). The cooking loss was also significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the EXP group when compared to the CON group. In conclusion, the results indicate that SOD-rich melon supplement (30 g/ton of the concentrate feed) can considerably improve carcass yield, some serum biochemical parameters, and meat quality characteristics in Tuj lambs. Thus, the supplementation of lamb diets with a SOD-rich melon additive may be used as an effective nutritional approach to improve their performance and health.

1. Introduction

It is estimated that 30% of the earth’s surface is occupied by livestock systems, accounting for a global asset value of 1.4 trillion USD. The socioeconomically deprived population of the world is highly dependent upon the livestock sector for their socioeconomic uplift and survival. Livestock is the main provider of food and traction for growing crops in smallholders systems. Livestock products, at the moment, are contributing 17% to the caloric consumption and 33% to protein consumption, globally [1]. However, this contribution is changing constantly with the expansion of the world’s population. As climate change continues to impact the world, it is becoming harder and harder to find enough feed resources for livestock. This is especially true in lower- and middle-income countries, where many of the feed resources are in decline. Hence, providing balanced feed to meet the nutritional needs of livestock is the biggest challenge faced by the world today. Recently, the usage of unconventional feed resources, such as vegetable and fruit wastes [2,3], shrubs and herbs [4], agro-industrial by-products [5,6], legume seeds and pods [7,8], and forages [9], has gained a strong footing and their impact on productive and reproductive traits of different animals has been evaluated. Other than a few unfavorable consequences [10], such feed resources have been found to be useful and nutritionally appropriate in meeting animals’ requirements [11,12].
Farm animals, at various stages of their lifecycle, can be exposed to a variety of stresses, which may result in decreased production efficiency along with poor quality and yield of produced goods [13]. An accelerated rate of cellular damage caused by oxygen and oxygen-derived free radicals (reactive oxygen species, ROS), is a hallmark of oxidative stress. Lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids are damaged by these oxidative stressors [14]. As a result, oxidative stress may play a role in various pathological conditions in farm animals [15]. Therefore, the body has an antioxidant network, to protect itself from oxidative damage. Antioxidants can donate electrons to oxidants, which causes them to become radicals themselves. However, these radicals are far more stable and unable to cause cellular damage [16]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is one of the major enzymatic antioxidants, which catalytically convert O2 to oxygen (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), thus protecting against the deleterious effects of oxidants. The SOD can be supplemented from various external sources, but its low bioavailability is the major issue that scientists are working to improve [17,18]. Another problem in supplementing the SOD in animal feed is the inactivation of the enzymes at lower pH, but its low bioavailability is the major issue that scientists are working to improve. It has been demonstrated to shield the enzyme against degradation at lower pH levels [18]. The Cucumis melo L. is a non-genetically modified melon variety with high levels of antioxidant enzymes, especially SOD (2.6 × 106 IU/kg), along with glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase. Supplementation of such SOD-rich sources into animal diets can help enhance the animal’s endogenous antioxidant defenses [19]. The antioxidant effects of dietary supplementation of a SOD-rich melon concentrate have been shown in different animal models, including both ruminant and non-ruminant animals, i.e., hamsters [20,21,22], rats [19], sheep and goats [23,24], chicken [25,26], and rabbits [27]. Similar work has been reported for pigs as well [28].
Turkey harbors about 23 million heads of sheep (both fat and thin-tailed), being one of the largest sheep producers in the world. The Tuj (Tushin) breed of sheep is native to the Caucasus and they are mainly bred in the North-Eastern part of Turkey [29]. This breed is primarily used for meat, but it can also be raised for milk and wool. The animal keepers who raise this sheep breed do not use any supplements, so the animals’ performance depends solely on the quality of hay and pasture they are fed on. The Tuj breed of sheep has not been studied in depth for whether or not it benefits from feed additives supplementation. In the last decade or so, a few studies have been reported, mainly focusing on different fattening systems and animal production characteristics [30,31,32]. However, there is a complete paucity of literature regarding the effects of feed additive supplementation in this sheep breed.
Moreover, there is almost no literature related to the usage of SOD-rich melon supplemented feed in sheep. Therefore, the present study was designed with the hypothesis that feeding Tuj lambs with a SOD-rich melon-supplemented diet may provide beneficial results in terms of various production and biochemical parameters as well as meat quality traits. The objective of the present study, specifically, was to assess the effects of SOD-rich melon feed supplement on the performance, serum biochemical and antioxidant indexes, and meat quality characteristics of Tuj lambs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Animals and Diet

This study was conducted on weaned Tuj lambs (n = 24) at the age of 60 ± 5.0 days with a body weight (BW) of 23.14 ± 0.5 kg. During the study, the lambs were housed in individual chambers with a size of 135 × 120 × 66 cm3. Prior to the experiment, all animals were vaccinated (for enterotoxaemia) and treated for internal and external parasites. After a one-week adaptation period, the animals were divided into two groups, i.e., the control (CON) and the experimental (EXP) (n = 12 per group). The study was conducted according to a randomized complete block design. The animals were blocked after seven days weaned, and body weights and daily body weight gains were recorded and divided into groups keeping the averages of the blocking parameters as close to each other as possible. The trial was conducted for a period of 56 days. During the study period, lambs were given a diet containing, on average, 70% concentrate and 30% forage. Thus, 700 g of concentrated feed (Table 1), 225 g of wet sugar beet pulp, and 200 g of wheat straw were fed twice a day. The average daily feed intake was adjusted, with an acceptable level of feed refusal being maintained at approximately 10% of the total daily amount supplied in order to ensure ad libitum feed intake. Water was offered ad libitum. Isocaloric (2700 kcal/kg DM) and isonitrogenic (16% DM protein) rations were prepared by calculating the daily nutrient needs of lambs for an average daily gain of 200 g/d in compliance with the recommendations of National Research Council [33]. Nutrient analysis of the concentrated feed was performed according to [34]. While no additives were added to the rations of the CON group, a new generation antioxidant additive named SOD-rich melon was added to the rations of the EXP group. The supplementation was carried out within the concentrate feed, and the dose was calculated according to the level of 30 g/ton of the concentrate in compliance with the recommendation of the manufacturer. The SOD-rich melon product was procured from a private commercial company (MeloFeed® (SOD = 2.6 × 106 IU/kg), Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Lallemand Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada).

2.2. Performance Traits

For the average daily feed intake (DFI), the left-over feed was weighed the next morning, whereas the feed efficiency ratio (FER) was determined as weight gain/feed intake as prescribed earlier [35]. The method of feeding, and the timing of weighing and deducing left over were kept the same (8:00, 18:00) for the purpose of monotony in the study. The study animals were weighed on day 0 and at the end of the trial (after sacrificing) for deducting the initial and final body weights. At the termination of the experiment, all the animals were subjected to 16 h fasting, and transported to a slaughterhouse. The animals were humanely handled, properly restrained, and slaughtered by a precise incision on major vessels (carotid, jugular) behind the jaw via a sharp knife. Animals were allowed to bleed sufficiently through the carotid, jugular vessels before the skinning and evisceration. After evisceration, carcass weights were recorded, and carcass yields were calculated as prescribed [36] and given below:
Carcass   Yield   ( % ) = Dressed   Carcass   Weight Live   Weight × 100

2.3. Serum Biochemical Profile

For the purpose of serum extraction, blood collection was carried out antiseptically from the jugular vein of each animal. Blood was collected in serum-collecting vacutainers containing thixotropic gel for serum extraction (BD vacutainers®, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The collection method, timing, personnel, and restraint were standardized to minimize stress on the study animals. Samples were transported to the laboratory in ice packs for further analysis within 1 h. Blood in serum tubes was allowed to clot for 30 min before serum extraction through centrifugation (2000× g for 10 min). Samples were refrigerated at −20 °C until being further analyzed for serum biochemical profile.
The serum biochemical profile viz. glucose, total protein (TP), cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), low density lipoproteins (LDL), high density lipoproteins (HDL), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P) were attained through commercial kits (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions using a spectrophotometer.

2.4. Antioxidant Profile

The malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined using a commercial assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, CAT: K35000), which implies thiobarbituric acid. Reading was taken at 532 nm. Glutathione (GSH) was deduced through a commercial kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, CAT: NB1214), which implies the dithio dinitrobenzoic acid method. Absorbance was read at 412 nm [25].

2.5. Meat Quality Characteristics

After slaughter, the Longissimus dorsi muscles were used for meat quality traits as prescribed earlier [37]. The samples obtained from the muscles were kept at +4 °C for 48 h, and later the cross-sectional color intensities of meat samples were determined by making four measurements (L *, a *, and b *) from each sample with a colorimeter device (Konica Minolta CR-200 Chromameter, Tokyo, Japan).
The Longissimus dorsi muscle samples were weighted (initial weight). They were then placed in plastic bags, and cooked at an internal temperature of 70 °C in a water bath maintained at 75 °C to calculate the cooking loss. The bags were cooled for 30 min under running tap water before being patted dry using paper towels. Samples were weighed after cooking (final weight), and cooking loss (g/kg) was determined as:
Cooking   Loss   ( % ) = Final   Weight     Initial   Weight   Final   Weight × 100

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows version 12, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An independent measures design (between groups) of the study was applied for ascertaining the effect of treatment as per the following equation:
µj = µ + Tj,
For j = 1.2 (groups); if j = 0, the treatment has no significant effect. A probability level of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data is presented as mean (±standard error). The difference between the two groups (control and experimental) was deduced through student t-test.

3. Results

The results of the present study regarding the performance characteristics of two study groups, i.e., control and experimental (fed with SOD-rich melon), are given in Table 2. The FER was significantly (p < 0.05) lower (11%), whereas the carcass yield was significantly (p = 0.001) higher (2.6%) in the EXP group (fed SOD-rich melon supplement in their concentrate feed) as compared to the CON group. Though the final BW increased for the experimental group (6.5%), the difference was statistically (p > 0.05) non-significant. No significant (p > 0.05) effect was noticed for average body weight gain (BWG) and DFI.
The serum biochemical profile of the present research work showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in glucose (18.5%) and HDL (20.5%) levels of EXP group as compared to CON group. However, cholesterol, TGs, and LDL were significantly (p = 0.02, 0.001, 0.001, respectively) lower in experimental groups (Table 3). The TP increased in the experimental group (10.35 ± 7.2 g/dL) as compared to the CON group (7.7 ± 1.3 g/dL); however, the results were statistically non-significant (p > 0.05).
Both the antioxidant profiles (MDA and GSH) examined in present study were significantly (p < 0.05) different for both studied groups. The MDA was significantly (p < 0.05) lower, whereas GSH was significantly (p < 0.05) higher for the experimentally fed group as shown in Figure 1.
The results for meat quality characteristics of the present study are presented in Table 4. Cooking loss decreased significantly (p = 0.016) for the EXP group. However, L *, a *, and b * values for meat color index and pH were non-significantly (p > 0.05) different within both study groups.

4. Discussion

This is the first such study that reports the effect of supplementation (SOD-rich melon supplement) on various physiological characteristics of Tuj lambs. As limited work has been reported for SOD-rich melon supplementation in sheep, the logical discussion and comparisons have been made with other species.
Regarding the performance characteristics attained in the present study for the EXP and CON groups, the carcass yield was improved in the EXP group fed SOD-rich melon supplement. However, our study found no significant effect of the SOD supplementation on body BW, BWG, and DFI. A prior study conducted on West African Dwarf (WAD) goats (n = 80) to ascertain the growth, nutritional intake, and digestibility of melon husk and palm oil slurry (POS) as a substitute to maize offal at 30% in concentrate diets [23] has revealed better results for DFI, feed conversion ratio (FCR), daily average weight gain, protein intake, and dry matter digestibility of the animals given melon husk than those fed diets containing 30% POS. It became clear from this study that goats could consume melon husk at the optimal inclusion levels of 30%, at which performance characteristics are improved. Our results are also in line with those reported in another study conducted on WAD goats fed with Moringa oleifera as a supplement [38]. Similarly, Raza [39], while working on broiler growth performance parameters, has reported that live weight, average body weight gain, DFI and FCR did not change between treatment groups fed SOD-melon supplements and control group. Melon supplementation has also been given to other species in other research works, such as on rabbits and hamsters, and it has been reported that almost all performance characteristics tend to increase for melon husk-fed rabbits and hamsters [20,27]. Bezerra et al. [40] found that a high-concentration feed including various antioxidants (castor and cashew nut shell oils, selenium and vitamin E) did not affect the lambs’ performance characteristics. The difference in results of various performance traits recorded globally for different antioxidants could be attributed to variation in species, breed, type and concentration of antioxidants fed as a supplement, or management practices. In addition, by adding SOD, the animal’s body is better prepared to defend itself against the damaging effects of oxidative stress, which enhances the efficiency of nutrient utilization, muscle growth, and carcass yield.
In the present study, FER was decreased by SOD-rich melon supplementation in Tuj lambs compared to the CON group. This is in concordance with prior studies on lambs, which have demonstrated that supplementation may reduce FER in sheep and goats owing to ruminal acidosis [23,31]. Furthermore, higher carcass yield, as noticed in our study, can be resulted with lower FER in sheep and goats.
Regarding the serum biochemical profile results of this study, a significant increase was noticed in glucose and HDL levels in the EXP group as compared to the CON group. However, cholesterol, TGs, and LDL were significantly lower in the experimental group. The TP increased in the experimental group as compared to the CON group; however, it was statistically non-significant. In general, variable results have been reported for serum chemistry profiles globally for lambs supplemented with SOD-rich melon and other antioxidants. A study conducted earlier on WAD goats fed with three different diets (control, locust bean pulp, and melon husk) has shown that the glucose level tends to increase in goats fed with 20% melon husk (64.8 mg/dL) as compared to those fed with 10% melon husk (55.2 mg/dL) and the control group (47.2 mg/dL) [41]. It was put forth that supplementations such as melon husk tend to increase the energy level of the animals, resulting in an elevated glucose level, as noticed in the results of glucose levels in the present study. It has been elucidated that energy production, expenditure, and its metabolism are a mainstay in regulating the glucose levels of an animal [42,43]. The observed shift in serum glucose levels following SOD-melon supplementation could be due to changes in metabolic hormones that regulate energy and nutritional demands in response to oxidative stress conditions. Previous studies have also shown that such physiological responses involve the modulation of metabolic pathways via the action of glucocorticoids and insulin and result in increased blood glucose levels [44,45]. Specifically, during stress conditions, serum levels of glucocorticoids increase, which in turn decreases the responsiveness to insulin [46]. This rise in glucocorticoids promotes glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis in the liver [47] and facilitates the conversion of alpha-ketoacid to glucose [48]. These metabolic changes ultimately result in higher glucose levels in the bloodstream, which serve to modulate oxidative stress.
The increase in the TP level for the EXP group in our study is in corroboration with earlier studies, which have given a plausible justification of the feed type and protein content of the feed as primary factors in controlling TP levels in the body [49]. Furthermore, the levels of circulating Ca and P did not alter between the SOD-melon fed group and the CON groups of the present study. Similar results have been reported for blood Ca and P levels in the lambs fed selenium [50] and male buffalo calves fed selenium and copper [51]. Owing to the paucity of literature on the effects of SOD-rich supplements/other antioxidants on circulating Ca and P in the serum of sheep, a comparison is difficult. A higher population size combined with different dosages of SOD-rich melon feed may reveal these phenomena.
The biological benefits of SOD-melon are believed to be primarily due to its antioxidant qualities, which may be crucial in the prevention of diseases associated with oxidative stress. The preventive impact of antioxidants on a healthy lipid profile has been shown by many studies [20,21]. Compared to the CON group, the SOD-melon-supplemented group in the current research had lower plasma levels of cholesterol, TG, and LDL. Our findings are consistent with those of Jiang et al. [52], who discovered that supplementing the diet with an antioxidant (lycopene, which is mainly contained in tomatoes and tomato byproducts) reduced blood cholesterol, TGs, and LDL. Decreased cholesterol in the EXP group of the present study (132.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL) as compared to the control group (145.9 ± 21.5 mg/dL) is in line with most of the research conducted on various feed supplements to goats and sheep [41,53]. Free radicals are thought to be responsible for the development of degenerative illnesses such as atherosclerosis, which has a positive correlation with serum LDL and an inverse correlation with HDL, according to Amarenco et al. [54]. Free radicals are produced excessively in all living things as a consequence of enhanced metabolic activity brought on by stress. Cholesterol and TG levels are likewise raised by stress, and supplementing with antioxidants lowers these elevated levels [55]. Cholesterol also tends to decrease in summer as compared to winter in all ruminants, being a temperature-related adaptation [56]. Furthermore, total body water and acetate concentration also are the main factors that control circulating cholesterol levels in goats and sheep [56].
Unsaturated fatty acids, in particular, are readily oxidized and may start chain reactions that lead to more oxidative damage. Lipids are significant components of the lipid bilayer that makes up the cellular membrane. Polyunsaturated lipids are more vulnerable to oxidation. Therefore, several diseases have been linked to lipid peroxides and their byproducts, which may harm membrane-bound enzymes and other macromolecules such as DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) [55]. Malondialdehyde can be used to measure lipid oxidation. Malondialdehyde is a lipid breakdown product that may be measured as a lipid hydro-peroxide [57]. Regarding the antioxidant profile of the present study (GSH and MDA), the EXP group had higher GSH and decreased levels of MDA. This is in line with a work conducted on broilers fed SOD-rich melon in which MDA level decreased in the SOD-fed group [39]. However, higher levels of both GSH and MDA in growing rabbits fed with SOD-rich diet have been conversely reported [27]. The capacity of SOD-melon to alter the antioxidant defense system could be a cause of the reduction in the plasma MDA level.
Numerous studies have connected diet to changes in meat quality parameters [6,58,59,60]. The present study showed that compared to the CON group, the EXP group fed with SOD-rich melon had considerably decreased cooking loss and higher meat color index values. Similar results have been reported for Boer goats fed with Andrographis paniculata, which showed an improved ratio of the carcass to fat, lean to the bone, lean to fat, and meat composition resulting in lower cooking losses [61]. Similar results have also been reported for lambs fed grass and concentrate [62,63]. However, in a study conducted on broilers, the quality of breast meat remained unaffected by a SOD-rich diet [39]. The consumer perception of meat color, which is still of utmost importance, is affected by a variety of factors [64]. The link between myoglobin levels and lightness is not statistically significant; however, there was a strong correlation between myoglobin concentration and redness [65]. Our results show a higher meat L * value; nevertheless, the a * value remained unaffected among the studied groups. According to Khliji et al. [66], customers generally find the color of fresh meat satisfactory when the a * and L * values are equal to or higher than 9.5 and 34, respectively. Our meat color parameters are in the customers’ 95% confidence acceptance range, as described earlier [66].
Similarly, the pH level is the most significant meat quality indicator of meat. Following the rigor mortis period, fresh meat’s pH level significantly impacts several meat quality traits, such as water-holding capacity and texture. Therefore, determining the pH value is crucial in determining the quality of the meat and the preferences of the customer. It is well-recognized that the nutritional and homeostatic condition of myofibers before slaughter, which is relevant during rigor mortis, affects the quality of breast meat [67,68]. As a result of the anaerobic glycolytic pathway’s production of lactic acid, which turns the muscle into meat after slaughter, the pH of the muscle decreases [69]. The pH of meat affects the characteristics of meat quality by establishing an equilibrium between oppositely charged groups of muscle proteins that bind water, reducing the solubility of proteins, increasing the shrinking of proteins owing to charge attraction, and reducing protein solubility. The electrostatic repulsion between protein chains is resolved, and further shrinking occurs when the attraction between the opposing charges on the nearby proteins occurs [70,71]. This makes the flesh more exudative, soft, and pale. The meat pH in the present study was unaffected by the treatments since the pH of the meat was comparable among the groups. The cooking loss percentage of the present study was in the range of different native sheep breeds in Turkey, which have cooking loss values between 25.57 to 34.78% [72,73,74].
In conclusion, the results of the study indicate that the Tuj lambs fed with SOD-rich melon (supplemented at the rate of 30 g/ton of the concentrate) considerably enhance the carcass yield, some serum biochemical parameters, and meat quality characteristics of Tuj lambs. Specifically, the supplemented group had greater carcass yield; higher serum glucose levels, high density lipoproteins; and reduced serum cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, and triglycerides. SOD supplementation also enhanced antioxidant status (as evidenced by higher levels of GSH and lower levels of MDA). Furthermore, the meat from the supplemented group displayed a lower cooking loss while all the other studied meat quality traits remained unaffected. Our results imply that SOD-rich melon supplementation can be an effective nutritional approach for enhancing the production, health status, and meat quality of lambs. It is recommended that variable doses of melon feed be tested under different raising conditions, and certain other characteristics such as hematochemical profile, nutrient digestibility, fatty acid profile in the blood, and fatty acid composition of meat be added in future studies, as they are the limitations of the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Ö. and T.Ş.; methodology, M.Ö.; software, M.Ö. and İ.Ş.; validation, S.U. and M.A.Y.; formal analysis, M.Ö. and R.R.; investigation, M.Ö., Ö.K. and B.Y.; resources, R.R.; data curation, M.Ö. and T.Ş.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R., S.U. and M.A.Y.; visualization, R.R.; supervision, T.Ş.; project administration, M.Ö., T.Ş. and Ö.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the principles and permission of the Kafkas University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee, Kars, Turkiye (KAU-HADYEK-2021/155).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thornton, P.K. Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 2853–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bakshi, M.; Wadhwa, M.; Makkar, H.P. Waste to worth: Vegetable wastes as animal feed. CABI Rev. 2016, 2016, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kazemi, M.; Ibrahimi Khorram Abadi, E.; Mokhtarpour, A. Evaluation of the nutritional value of Iranian melon (Cucumis melo cv. Khatooni) wastes before and after ensiling in sheep feeding. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2019, 7, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Salem, H.B.; Nefzaoui, A. Feed blocks as alternative supplements for sheep and goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Adebowale, E.; Taiwo, A. Utilization of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products as complete diets for West African dwarf sheep and goats. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 1996, 23, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jabbar, M.; Anjum, M.; Rehman, S.; Shahzad, W. Comparative efficiency of sunflower meal and cottonseed cakes in the feed of crossbred calves for meat production. Pak. Vet. J. 2006, 26, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ngwa, A.; Nsahlai, I.; Bonsi, M. Feed intake and dietary preferences of sheep and goats offered hay and legume-tree pods in South Africa. Agrofor. Syst. 2003, 57, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khanum, S.; Yaqoob, T.; Sadaf, S.; Hussain, M.; Jabbar, M.; Hussain, H.; Kausar, R.; Rehman, S. Nutritional evaluation of various feedstuffs for livestock production using in vitro gas method. Pak. Vet. J. 2007, 27, 129. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jabbar, M.; Anjum, M. Effect of diets with different forage to concentrate ratio for fattening of Lohi lambs. Pak. Vet. J. 2008, 28, 150–152. [Google Scholar]
  10. Salem, H.B. Nutritional management to improve sheep and goat performances in semiarid regions. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Blache, D.; Maloney, S.K.; Revell, D.K. Use and limitations of alternative feed resources to sustain and improve reproductive performance in sheep and goats. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 140–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vasta, V.; Nudda, A.; Cannas, A.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A. Alternative feed resources and their effects on the quality of meat and milk from small ruminants. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 223–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rostagno, M.H. Can stress in farm animals increase food safety risk? Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, B.; Manuja, A.; Aich, P. Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front. Biosci. 2012, 4, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Durand, D.; Damon, M.; Gobert, M. Oxidative stress in farm animals: General aspects. Cah. Nutr. Diet 2013, 48, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lykkesfeldt, J.; Svendsen, O. Oxidants and antioxidants in disease: Oxidative stress in farm animals. Vet. J. 2007, 173, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arangoa, M.A.; Campanero, M.A.; Renedo, M.J.; Ponchel, G.; Irache, J.M. Gliadin nanoparticles as carriers for the oral administration of lipophilic drugs. Relationships between bioadhesion and pharmacokinetics. Pharm. Res. 2001, 18, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vouldoukis, I.; Conti, M.; Krauss, P.; Kamaté, C.; Blazquez, S.; Tefit, M.; Mazier, D.; Calenda, A.; Dugas, B. Supplementation with gliadin-combined plant superoxide dismutase extract promotes antioxidant defences and protects against oxidative stress. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carillon, J.; Rugale, C.; Rouanet, J.-M.; Cristol, J.-P.; Lacan, D.; Jover, B. Endogenous antioxidant defense induction by melon superoxide dismutase reduces cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 65, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Decorde, K.; Agne, A.; Lacan, D.; Ramos, J.; Fouret, G.; Ventura, E.; Feillet-Coudray, C.; Cristol, J.-P.; Rouanet, J.-M. Preventive effect of a melon extract rich in superoxide scavenging activity on abdominal and liver fat and adipokine imbalance in high-fat-fed hamsters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6461–6467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Décordé, K.; Ventura, E.; Lacan, D.; Ramos, J.; Cristol, J.-P.; Rouanet, J.-M. An SOD rich melon extract Extramel® prevents aortic lipids and liver steatosis in diet-induced model of atherosclerosis. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010, 20, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carillon, J.; Romain, C.; Bardy, G.; Fouret, G.; Feillet-Coudray, C.; Gaillet, S.; Lacan, D.; Cristol, J.-P.; Rouanet, J.-M. Cafeteria diet induces obesity and insulin resistance associated with oxidative stress but not with inflammation: Improvement by dietary supplementation with a melon superoxide dismutase. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 65, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanwo, K.; Iposu, S.; Oso, A.; Fanimo, A.; Abiola, S. Growth Performance, nutrient intake and digestibility of goats fed melon husk and palm oil slurry at 30% inclusion level. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2011, 38, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sanwo, K.; Iposu, S.; Okwelum, N.; Aderinboye, R.; Oso, A.; Fanimo, A.; Abiola, S. Growth performance, nutrient intake, digestibility and carcass characteristics of goats fed melon Husk (Colocynthis citrillus) and palm oil slurry (Elaeis guineensis) at 50% inclusion level. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2014, 41, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Zhong, X.; Shi, W.-y.; Guo, B. Study of malondialdehyde (MDA) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities in chickens infected with avian infectious bronchitis virus. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 9213–9217. [Google Scholar]
  26. Carillon, J.; Barbé, F.; Barial, S.; Saby, M.; Sacy, A.; Rouanet, J.-M. Diet supplementation with a specific melon concentrate improves oviduct antioxidant defenses and egg characteristics in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1898–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, A.; Alagbe, J.; Sharma, S.; Oluwafemi, R.; Agubosi, O. Effect of dietary supplementation of melon (Citrallus lanatus) seed oil on the growth performance and antioxidant status of growing rabbits. Indones. J. Innov. Appl. Sci. 2021, 1, 134–143. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lallès, J.-P.; Lacan, D.; David, J.-C. A melon pulp concentrate rich in superoxide dismutase reduces stress proteins along the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Nutrition 2011, 27, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ölmez, M.; Kanber, K.; Karadağoğlu, Ö.; Metin, Ö.; Şahİn, T.; Şerbetçİ, İ. Chia tohumu ve probiyotik/enzim İlavesinin ayrı ve kombine olarak tuj koyunları rasyonlarında kullanımının performans, rumen ve bazı kan parametreleri üzerine etkisi. OKÜ Fen Bil. Enst. 2022, 5, 1201–1215. [Google Scholar]
  30. Saatci, M.; Yildiz, S.; Kaya, I. New rearing systems for Tuj (Tushin) lambs. Small Rum. Res. 2003, 50, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarı, M.; Aksoy, A.R.; Tilki, M.; Kaya, İ.; Işık, S. Effect of different fattening methods on slaughter and carcass characteristics of Tuj male lambs. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2012, 55, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Onk, K.; Sari, M.; Gurcan, I.S. Estimation of live weights at the beginning and the end of grazing season in Tuj lambs via scores of factor analysis. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg 2018, 65, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  33. NARC. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; China Legal Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 21st ed.; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Souza, D.; Selaive-Villarroel, A.; Pereira, E.; Osório, J.; Teixeira, A. Growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of lambs produced from Dorper sheep crossed with Santa Inês or Brazilian Somali sheep. Small Rum. Res. 2013, 114, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sen, A.; Santra, A.; Karim, S. Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yarali, E.; Yilmaz, O.; Cemal, I.; Karaca, O.; TAŞKIN, T. Meat quality characteristics in Kıvırcık lambs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2014, 38, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Asaolu, V.; Binuomote, R.; Akinlade, J.; Aderinola, O.; Oyelami, O. Intake and growth performance of West African Dwarf goats fed Moringa oleifera, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala dried leaves as supplements to cassava peels. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2012, 2, 76–88. [Google Scholar]
  39. Raza, I. Effect of Dietary Herbal Extract and Probiotic Supplementation Alone or in Combination on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, and Stress Indicators of Broilers Subjected to High Stocking Density. Ph.D. Thesis, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bezerra, H.V.A.; Buarque, V.L.M.; Silva, L.S.B.; Leme, P.R.P.; Vidal, A.M.C.; Vaz, A.C.N.; Gallo, S.B.; Silva, S.L.; Leme, P.R. Effect of Castor and Cashew Nut Shell Oils, Selenium and Vitamin E as Antioxidants on the Health and Meat Stability of Lambs Fed a High-Concentrate Diet. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Okoruwa, M. Effects of locust bean pulp with melon husk supplementation on nitrogen utilization and blood chemistry of West African dwarf goats. Niger. J. Animal Sci. 2017, 19, 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  42. Comba, A.; Mert, H.; Comba, B. Leptin Levels and Lipids Profile Determination in Different Sheep Breeds. Pak. Vet. J. 2016, 36, 169–173. [Google Scholar]
  43. Soares, G.; Souto, R.; Cajueiro, J.; Afonso, J.; Rego, R.; Macêdo, A.; Soares, P.; Mendonça, C. Adaptive changes in blood biochemical profile of dairy goats during the period of transition. Rev. Méd. Vét. 2018, 169, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  44. Anwar, M.; Ramadan, T.; Taha, T. Serum metabolites, milk yield, and physiological responses during the first week after kidding in Anglo-Nubian, Angora, Baladi, and Damascus goats under subtropical conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 4795–4806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cappai, M.G.; Liesegang, A.; Dimauro, C.; Mossa, F.; Pinna, W. Circulating electrolytes in the bloodstream of transition Sarda goats make the difference in body fluid distribution between single vs. twin gestation. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 123, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schlumbohm, C.; Sporleder, H.; Gurtler, H.; Harmeyer, J. The influence of insulin on metabolism of glucose, free fatty acids and glycerol in normo-and hypocalcemic ewes during different reproductive states. DTW. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 1997, 104, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Swarbrick, M.; Zhou, H.; Seibel, M. Mechanisms in endocrinology: Local and systemic effects of glucocorticoids on metabolism: New lessons from animal models. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 185, R113–R129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Reece, W.O.; Erickson, H.H.; Goff, J.P.; Uemura, E.E. Dukes’ Physiology of Domestic Animals; John Wiley & Sons: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Okunlola, D.; Olorunnisomo, O.; Binuomote, R.; Amuda, A.; Agboola, A.; Omole, O. Heamatology and serum quality of red Sokoto goats fed baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) fruit meal supplement. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 54–56. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kumar, N.; Garg, A.K.; Mudgal, V.; Dass, R.S.; Chaturvedi, V.K.; Varshney, V.P. Effect of different levels of selenium supplementation on growth rate, nutrient utilization, blood metabolic profile, and immune response in lambs. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 126, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mudgal, V.; Garg, A.K.; Dass, R.S.; Varshney, V.P. Effect of selenium and copper supplementation on blood metabolic profile in male buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 121, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jiang, H.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Qu, Y.; Lu, X.; Luo, H. Effects of dietary lycopene supplementation on plasma lipid profile, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense system in feedlot Bamei lamb. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 958. [Google Scholar]
  53. El-Kady, R.; Abo Seder, S. Effect of natural plant supplements to diet of local goats on their growth performance. J. Animal Poult. prod. 2002, 27, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amarenco, P.; Goldstein, L.B.; Szarek, M.; Sillesen, H.; Rudolph, A.E.; Callahan III, A.; Hennerici, M.; Simunovic, L.; Zivin, J.A.; Welch, K.M.A. Effects of intense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial. Stroke 2007, 38, 3198–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sahin, N.; Sahin, K.; Onderci, M.; Karatepe, M.; Smith, M.; Kucuk, O. Effects of dietary lycopene and vitamin E on egg production, antioxidant status and cholesterol levels in Japanese quail. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 19, 224–230. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gupta, M.; Kumar, S.; Dangi, S.; Jangir, B.L. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to thermal stress in goats. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2013, 3, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tsikas, D. Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) and relatives in biological samples: Analytical and biological challenges. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 524, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Juniper, D.T.; Phipps, R.H.; Ramos-Morales, E.; Bertin, G. Effects of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 149, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, W.; Zhang, X.Y.; Du, J.; Li, Y.F.; Chen, Y.J.; Cao, Y. RNA-seq-based quanitative transcriptome analysis of meat color and taste from chickens administered by eucalyptus leaf polyphenols extract. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Önenç, S.S.; Özdoğan, M. Relationship between meat quality and animal nutrition. Hayvansal Üretim 2022, 63, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yusuf, A.; Goh, Y.; Samsudin, A.; Alimon, A.; Sazili, A. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat yield of Boer goats fed diets containing leaves or whole parts of Andrographis paniculata. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Priolo, A.; Micol, D.; Agabriel, J.; Prache, S.; Dransfield, E. Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems on lamb carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2002, 62, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sheridan, R.; Ferreira, A.; Hoffman, L. Production efficiency of South African Mutton Merino lambs and Boer goat kids receiving either a low or a high energy feedlot diet. Small Rum. Res. 2003, 50, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tomasevic, I.; Djekic, I.; Font-i-Furnols, M.; Terjung, N.; Lorenzo, J.M. Recent advances in meat color research. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, G.D.; Jeong, J.Y.; Hur, S.J.; Yang, H.S.; Jeon, J.T.; Joo, S.T. The relationship between meat color (CIE L* and a*), myoglobin content, and their influence on muscle fiber characteristics and pork quality. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2010, 30, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Khliji, S.; Van de Ven, R.; Lamb, T.; Lanza, M.; Hopkins, D. Relationship between consumer ranking of lamb colour and objective measures of colour. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Adzitey, F.; Huda, N. Effects of post-slaughter carcass handling on meat quality. Pak. Vet. J. 2012, 32, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao, J.; Zhao, G.; Jiang, R.; Zheng, M.; Chen, J.; Liu, R.; Wen, J. Effects of diet-induced differences in growth rate on metabolic, histological, and meat-quality properties of 2 muscles in male chickens of 2 distinct broiler breeds. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Duclos, M.J.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E. Muscle growth and meat quality. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2007, 16, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wismer–Perdersen, J. Chemistry of animal tissues: Water. In The Science of Meat and Meat Products; Food and Nutrition Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 141–154. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mir, N.A.; Rafiq, A.; Kumar, F.; Singh, V.; Shukla, V. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2997–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aksoy, Y.; Çiçek, Ü.; Şen, U.; Şirin, E.; Uğurlu, M.; Önenç, A.; Kuran, M.; Ulutaş, Z. Meat production characteristics of Turkish native breeds: II. meat quality, fatty acid, and cholesterol profile of lambs. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2019, 62, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Esenbuga, N.; Macit, M.; Karaoglu, M.; Aksakal, V.; Aksu, M.I.; Yoruk, M.A.; Gul, M. Effect of breed on fattening performance, slaughter and meat quality characteristics of Awassi and Morkaraman lambs. Livest. Sci. 2009, 123, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yakan, A.; Ünal, N. Meat production traits of a new sheep breed called Bafra in Turkey 2. Meat quality characteristics of lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2010, 42, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antioxidant profile of control and experimental SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs. MDA= malondialdehyde; GSH = glutathione; different letters (a,b) on error bars indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 within control and experimental group.
Figure 1. Antioxidant profile of control and experimental SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs. MDA= malondialdehyde; GSH = glutathione; different letters (a,b) on error bars indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 within control and experimental group.
Agriculture 13 00625 g001
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical analysis of concentrate feed.
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical analysis of concentrate feed.
Ingredients%
Barley41.00
Corn18.00
Wheat bran10.20
Cotton seed meal, 38% CP23.70
Sunflower oil 3.40
Dicalcium phosphate (DCP)0.15
Marble dust2.50
Salt0.80
Vit-min mix a0.25
Chemical analyses(%)
Dry matter90
Metabolized Energy (kcal/kg)2700
Crude protein17.00
Crude fiber6.65
Ether extract6.30
Ash6.82
Ca1.09
P0.55
a Each 1 kg of vitamin–mineral mix contained: 12,000,000 IU vitamin A, 3,000,000 IU vitamin D3, 30,000 mg vitamin E, 40,000 mg manganese, 45,000 mg iron, 55,000 mg zinc, 9000 mg copper, 750 mg iodine, 400 mg selenium, 150 mg cobalt, 32 g calcium, 18 g phosphorus.
Table 2. Performance characteristics of control and experimental SOD-rich melon group of Tuj lambs.
Table 2. Performance characteristics of control and experimental SOD-rich melon group of Tuj lambs.
TraitsControl
(n = 12)
Experimental
(n = 12)
p *
Initial Body Weight (kg)24.48 ± 3.1824.89 ± 2.990.767
Final Body Weight (kg)35.71 ± 3.3038.20 ± 3.150.101
Average Body Weight Gain (kg/day)0.20 ± 0.060.24 ± 0.040.131
Average Daily Feed Intake (kg/day)1.30 ± 0.381.40 ± 0.250.483
Feed Efficiency Ratio (kg/kg)6.59 ± 0.865.88 ± 0.400.029
Carcass Yield (%)60.11 ± 1.0761.76 ± 0.800.001
* Significant at p < 0.05 within the rows between control and experimental group.
Table 3. Serum chemistry profile of control and experimental SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs.
Table 3. Serum chemistry profile of control and experimental SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs.
Serum ProfileControl
(n = 12)
Experimental
(n = 12)
p *
Glucose (mg/dL)48.94 ± 5.2653.97 ± 6.470.010
Total proteins (g/dL)7.71 ± 1.3510.35 ± 7.220.116
Cholesterol (mg/dL)145.92 ± 21.55132.35 ± 12.510.021
Triglycerides (mg/dL)18.60 ± 2.0516.45 ± 1.640.001
High density lipoproteins (mg/dL)47.53 ± 15.9459.79 ± 20.960.044
Low density proteins (mg/dL)94.66 ± 22.8269.26 ± 20.770.001
Calcium (mg/dL)10.70 ± 2.9711.71 ± 2.350.241
Phosphorus (mg/dL)8.13 ± 1.588.74 ± 1.100.164
* Significant at p < 0.05 within the rows between control and experimental group.
Table 4. Meat quality characteristics of control and SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs.
Table 4. Meat quality characteristics of control and SOD-rich melon supplement group of Tuj lambs.
TraitsControl
(n = 12)
Experimental
(n = 12)
p *
Cooking Loss (%)28.6 ± 1.326.9 ± 1.50.016
Lightness (L *)41.5 ± 2.343.6 ± 2.20.059
Redness (a *)14.6 ± 0.715.2 ± 0.50.086
Yellowness (b *)7.2 ± 1.17.6 ± 1.80.532
pH5.9 ± 0.45.9 ± 0.60.911
* Significant at p < 0.05 within the rows between control and experimental group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ölmez, M.; Riaz, R.; Karadağoğlu, Ö.; Şahin, T.; Şerbetçi, İ.; Yılmaz, B.; Uysal, S.; Yörük, M.A. Effect of SOD-Rich Melon Supplement on Performance, Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant and Meat Quality Characteristics of Tuj Lambs. Agriculture 2023, 13, 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030625

AMA Style

Ölmez M, Riaz R, Karadağoğlu Ö, Şahin T, Şerbetçi İ, Yılmaz B, Uysal S, Yörük MA. Effect of SOD-Rich Melon Supplement on Performance, Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant and Meat Quality Characteristics of Tuj Lambs. Agriculture. 2023; 13(3):625. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ölmez, Mükremin, Roshan Riaz, Özlem Karadağoğlu, Tarkan Şahin, İdil Şerbetçi, Benian Yılmaz, Soner Uysal, and Mehmet Akif Yörük. 2023. "Effect of SOD-Rich Melon Supplement on Performance, Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant and Meat Quality Characteristics of Tuj Lambs" Agriculture 13, no. 3: 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop