- freely available
- re-usable
Brain Sci. 2012, 2(3), 267-297; doi:10.3390/brainsci2030267
Article
The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing
1
CNRS UMR7237, Louis Pasteur University, 12 rue Goethe, Strasbourg F-67000, France
2
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Eberhard Karls University, Gartenstr. 29, Tübingen D-72074, Germany
3
CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, 50 Avenue Tony Garnier, Lyon cedex 01 F-69366, France
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 June 2012; in revised form: 16 July 2012 / Accepted: 1 August 2012 / Published: 14 August 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Brain Knows More than It Admits: The Control of Cognition and Emotion by Non-Conscious Processes)
The original version is still available [1029 KB, uploaded 14 August 2012 09:32 CEST]
Abstract: This study compared automatic and controlled cognitive processes that underlie event-related potentials (ERPs) effects during speech perception. Sentences were presented to French native speakers, and the final word could be congruent or incongruent, and presented at one of four levels of degradation (using a modulation with pink noise): no degradation, mild degradation (2 levels), or strong degradation. We assumed that degradation impairs controlled more than automatic processes. The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) effects were defined as the differences between the corresponding wave amplitudes to incongruent words minus congruent words. Under mild degradation, where controlled sentence-level processing could still occur (as indicated by behavioral data), both N400 and LPC effects were delayed and the latter effect was reduced. Under strong degradation, where sentence processing was rather automatic (as indicated by behavioral data), no ERP effect remained. These results suggest that ERP effects elicited in complex contexts, such as sentences, reflect controlled rather than automatic mechanisms of speech processing. These results differ from the results of experiments that used word-pair or word-list paradigms.
Keywords: ERP; masking; mask; semantic; priming; control; context; auditory; language; speech
Article Statistics
Click here to load and display the download statistics.Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Daltrozzo, J.; Wioland, N.; Kotchoubey, B. The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing. Brain Sci. 2012, 2, 267-297.
AMA StyleDaltrozzo J, Wioland N, Kotchoubey B. The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing. Brain Sciences. 2012; 2(3):267-297.
Chicago/Turabian StyleDaltrozzo, Jérôme; Wioland, Norma; Kotchoubey, Boris. 2012. "The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing." Brain Sci. 2, no. 3: 267-297.
Brain Sci.
EISSN 2076-3425
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
