A Single Gyroscope Can Be Used to Accurately Determine Peak Eversion Velocity during Locomotion at Different Speeds and in Various Shoes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Test Procedure
2.3. Experimental Setup
2.4. Footwear Conditions
2.5. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Footwear Characteristics
3.2. Peak Eversion Velocity
3.3. Time Until Peak Eversion Velocity
4. Discussion
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Stacoff, A.; Reinschmidt, C.; Nigg, B.M.; van den Bogert, A.J.; Lundberg, A.; Denoth, J.; Stüssi, E. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin. Biomech. 2000, 15, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segesser, B.; Nigg, B.M. Insertionstendinosen am Schienbein, Achillodynie und Überlastungsfolgen am Fuss.-Ätiologie, Biomechanik, therapeutische Möglichkeiten. Orthopäde 1980, 9, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vtasalo, J.T.; Kvist, M. Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle athletes with and without shin splints. Am. J. Sports Med. 1983, 11, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Wit, B.; De Clercq, D.; Lenoir, M. The effect of varying midsole hardness on impact forces and foot motion during foot contact in running. J. Appl. Biomech. 1995, 11, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milani, T.L.; Hennig, E.M.; Lafortune, M.A. Perceptual and biomechanical variables for running in identical shoe constructions with varying midsole hardness. Clin. Biomech. 1997, 12, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, K.M.; Hamill, J. The role of selected extrinsic foot muscles during running. Clin. Biomech. 2004, 19, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oriwol, D.; Sterzing, T.; Milani, T.L. The position of medial dual density midsole elements in running shoes does not influence biomechanical variables. Footwear Sci. 2011, 3, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shih, Y.; Ho, C.-S.; Shiang, T.-Y. Measuring kinematic changes of the foot using a gyro sensor during intense running. J. Sports Sci. 2014, 32, 550–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Struzik, A.; Konieczny, G.; Grzesik, K.; Stawarz, M.; Winiarski, S.; Rokita, A. Relationship between lower limbs kinematic variables and effectiveness of sprint during maximum velocity phase. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2015, 17, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brauner, T.; Sterzing, T.; Milani, T.L. Ankle Frontal Plane Kinematics Determined By Goniometer, Gyrometer and Motion Analysis System: a Measurement Device Validation. In Proceedings of the 22nd Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, Cape Town, South Africa, 5–9 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, T.; Inoue, Y.; Shibata, K. Development of a wearable sensor system for quantitative gait analysis. Measurement 2009, 42, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milani, T.L.; Schnabel, G.; Hennig, E.M. Rearfoot Motion and Pressure Distribution Patterns during Running in Shoes with Varus and Valgus Wedges. J. Appl. Biomech. 1995, 11, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayagoitia, R.E.; Nene, A.V.; Veltink, P.H. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: An inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J. Biomech. 2002, 35, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lederer, P.; Blickhan, R.; Schlarb, H. RearfootAngle Velocities During Running—A Comparison Between Optoelectronic and Gyroscopic Motion Analysis. Port. J. Sport Sci. 2011, 11, 903–906. [Google Scholar]
- Heidenfelder, J.; Sterzing, T.; Milani, T.L. Systematically modified crash-pad reduces impact shock in running shoes. Footwear Sci. 2010, 2, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giandolini, M.; Horvais, N.; Farges, Y.; Samozino, P.; Morin, J.B. Impact reduction through long-term intervention in recreational runners: Midfoot strike pattern versus low-drop/low-heel height footwear. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 113, 2077–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laughton, C.A.; McClay Davis, I.; Hamill, J. Effect of strike pattern and orthotic intervention on tibial shock during running. J. Appl. Biomech. 2003, 19, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwanitz, S.; Odenwald, S. Long-term cushioning properties of running shoes. Eng. Sport 2008, 7, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwanitz, S.; Möser, S.; Odenwald, S. Comparison of test methods to quantify shock attenuating properties of athletic footwear. Procedia Eng. 2010, 2, 2805–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Quantitative Methods in Psychology. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hopkins, W.G.; Marshall, S.W.; Batterham, A.M.; Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lohman, E.B.; Sackiriyas, K.S.B.; Swen, R.W. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking. Phys. Ther. Sport 2011, 12, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nigg, B.M.; Bahlsen, H.A.; Luethi, S.M.; Stokes, S. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. J. Biomech. 1987, 20, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Footwear Condition | Stiffness (N/mm) | Heelheight (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | ±SD | |
AD | 210.3 | 0.4 | 22.7 | 0.0 |
AS | 156.9 | 0.1 | 30.4 | 0.0 |
PU | 177.8 | 0.4 | 24.2 | 0.0 |
Speed | Footwear Condition | MD (deg/s) | SD (deg/s) | r | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 m/s | AD | 23.7 | 55.9 | 0.96 1 | 0.92 2 |
AS | 10.4 | 49.3 | 0.94 1 | 0.87 2 | |
PU | 26.2 | 50.8 | 0.91 1 | 0.82 2 | |
2.5 m/s | AD | 30.3 | 26.0 | 0.93 1 | 0.86 2 |
AS | −30.6 | 27.2 | 0.94 1 | 0.87 2 | |
PU | 20.5 | 30.5 | 0.89 1 | 0.79 2 | |
3.5 m/s | AD | 49.8 | 46.9 | 0.97 1 | 0.94 2 |
AS | −30.9 | 35.8 | 0.91 1 | 0.83 2 | |
PU | 12.3 | 45.0 | 0.88 1 | 0.76 2 | |
Individual speed | AD | 38.4 | 44.3 | 0.92 1 | 0.84 2 |
AS | −33.7 | 49.0 | 0.91 1 | 0.81 2 | |
PU | 23.7 | 58.8 | 0.88 1 | 0.77 2 |
Speed | Footwear Condition | MD (ms) | SD (ms) | r | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 m/s | AD | 4.1 | 2.4 | 0.88 1 | 0.77 2 |
AS | 5.2 | 4.4 | 0.78 1 | 0.60 2 | |
PU | 5.3 | 3.5 | 0.86 1 | 0.73 2 | |
2.5 m/s | AD | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0.89 1 | 0.77 2 |
AS | 1.6 | 3.7 | 0.88 1 | 0.76 2 | |
PU | 1.0 | 6.6 | 0.71 1 | 0.49 2 | |
3.5 m/s | AD | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.91 1 | 0.83 2 |
AS | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.92 1 | 0.84 2 | |
PU | 1.9 | 4.3 | 0.83 1 | 0.67 2 | |
Individual speed | AD | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.94 1 | 0.87 2 |
AS | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0.89 1 | 0.79 2 | |
PU | 1.3 | 4.0 | 0.85 1 | 0.72 2 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mitschke, C.; Öhmichen, M.; Milani, T.L. A Single Gyroscope Can Be Used to Accurately Determine Peak Eversion Velocity during Locomotion at Different Speeds and in Various Shoes. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070659
Mitschke C, Öhmichen M, Milani TL. A Single Gyroscope Can Be Used to Accurately Determine Peak Eversion Velocity during Locomotion at Different Speeds and in Various Shoes. Applied Sciences. 2017; 7(7):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070659
Chicago/Turabian StyleMitschke, Christian, Matthias Öhmichen, and Thomas L. Milani. 2017. "A Single Gyroscope Can Be Used to Accurately Determine Peak Eversion Velocity during Locomotion at Different Speeds and in Various Shoes" Applied Sciences 7, no. 7: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070659