Next Article in Journal
An Overview of the Current State of Women’s Leadership in Higher Education in Saudi Arabia and a Proposal for Future Research Directions
Previous Article in Journal
An Inductive Discussion of the Interrelationships between Nursing Shortage, Horizontal Violence, Generational Diversity, and Healthy Work Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Adm. Sci. 2017, 7(4), 35; doi:10.3390/admsci7040035

Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes

1
The Australia and New Zealand School of Government PO Box 230 Carlton South VIC 3053, Australia
2
Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg DK-2000, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 July 2017 / Revised: 30 August 2017 / Accepted: 19 September 2017 / Published: 26 September 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [586 KB, uploaded 28 September 2017]   |  

Abstract

Strategic concepts and practices first evolved in the private sector, so they evoked much controversy when they migrated to the public sector from the late 1970s onwards. Partly this was about their (in)applicability to the distinctive features of government organizations, in particular their focus on public as well as private value, their situation in a political rather than a market environment, their almost exclusive capacity to use legal authority to achieve purposes, and the extent to which they often need to share power over personnel and resources with other public sector agencies. These and other factors complicated efforts to apply New Public Management and similar frameworks in strategy concepts in a governmental context. Partly also the traditional private-sector focus on single organizations did not resonate with the growth of network governance from the 1990s. The authors argue for an alternative model based primarily on the public value framework as a means of incorporating and going beyond traditional strategy thinking. View Full-Text
Keywords: strategy; public sector strategy; public value; authorizing environment; network governance; comparing public and private sectors strategy; public sector strategy; public value; authorizing environment; network governance; comparing public and private sectors
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Alford, J.; Greve, C. Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes. Adm. Sci. 2017, 7, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Adm. Sci. EISSN 2076-3387 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top