Next Article in Journal
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among Cardiac Patients: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Considerations for Assessment and Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Local Environmental Grassroots Activism: Contributions from Environmental Psychology, Sociology and Politics
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Treatment-Resistant Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: The Emory Treatment Resistance Interview for PTSD (E-TRIP)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Protocol for Evaluating Contextual Design Principles
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Behav. Sci. 2015, 5(1), 1-26; doi:10.3390/bs5010001

Music as Environment: An Ecological and Biosemiotic Approach

Faculty of Arts, Section of Musicology, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Blijde Inkomststraat 21, PO BOX 3313, Leuven 3000, Belgium
Academic Editor: Jack L. Nasar
Received: 2 September 2014 / Accepted: 24 November 2014 / Published: 23 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Environmental Psychology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [119 KB, uploaded 29 December 2014]

Abstract

This paper provides an attempt to conceive of music in terms of a sounding environment. Starting from a definition of music as a collection of vibrational events, it introduces the distinction between discrete-symbolic representations as against analog-continuous representations of the sounds. The former makes it possible to conceive of music in terms of a Humboldt system, the latter in terms of an experiential approach. Both approaches, further, are not opposed to each other, but are complementary to some extent. There is, however, a distinction to be drawn between the bottom-up approach to auditory processing of environmental sounds and music, which is continuous and proceeding in real time, as against the top-down approach, which is proceeding at a level of mental representation by applying discrete symbolic labels to vibrational events. The distinction is discussed against the background of phylogenetic and ontogenetic claims, with a major focus on the innate auditory capabilities of the fetus and neonate and the gradual evolution from mere sensory perception of sound to sense-making and musical meaning. The latter, finally, is elaborated on the basis of the operational concepts of affordance and functional tone, thus bringing together some older contributions from ecology and biosemiotics. View Full-Text
Keywords: music as environment; sonic universe; Humboldt system; internal semantics; fetal auditory development; ecology; affordance; biosemiotics music as environment; sonic universe; Humboldt system; internal semantics; fetal auditory development; ecology; affordance; biosemiotics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Reybrouck, M. Music as Environment: An Ecological and Biosemiotic Approach. Behav. Sci. 2015, 5, 1-26.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top