The 1976 Guatemala Earthquake: ESI Scale and Probabilistic/Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Approaches
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Geological Framework and Historical Seismicity of Guatemala
1.2. The 4 February 1976 Earthquake
2. Methods
2.1. The ESI Scale
2.2. Seismic Hazard Analysis (SHA)
2.2.1. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA)
2.2.2. Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. ESI Scale
3.2. PSHA and DSHA
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Power, M.; Chiou, C.; Abrahamson, N.; Bozorgnia, Y.; Shantz, T.; Roblee, C. An Overview of the NGA Project. Earthq. Spectra 2008, 24, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michetti, A.M.; Esposito, E.; Guerrieri, L.; Porfido, S.; Serva, L.; Tatevossian, R.; Vittori, E.; Audemard, F.; Azuma, T.; Clague, J.; et al. Intensity Scale ESI 2007. In Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geologica D’Italia; ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale: Rome, Italy, 2007; Volume 74, p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- Serva, L.; Blumetti, A.M.; Esposito, E.; Guerrieri, L.; Michetti, A.M.; Okumura, K.; Porfido, S.; Reicherter, K.; Silva, P.G.; Vittori, E. Earthquake Environmental Effects, intensity and seismic hazard assessment: The lesson of some recent large earthquakes. In Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geologica D’Italia; ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Espinosa, A.F. (Ed.) The Guatemalan Earthquake of February 4, 1976, a Preliminary Report; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Harp, E.L.; Keefer, D.K.; Sato, H.P.; Yagi, H. Landslide inventories: The essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses. Eng. Geol. 2011, 122, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porfido, S.; Esposito, E.; Sacchi, M.; Molisso, F.; Mazzola, S. Impact of Ground Effects for an appropriate mitigation strategy in seismic area: The example of Guatemala 1976 earthquake. Eng. Geol. Soc. Territ. 2015, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harp, E.L.; Wilson, R.C.; Wieczorek, G.F. Landslides from the February 4, 1976, Guatemala Earthquake; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 1981.
- Plafker, G.; Bonilla, M.G.; Bonis, S.B. The Guatemalan Earthquake of February 4, 1976; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 1976; pp. 38–51.
- Hoose, S.N.; Wilson, R.C.; Rosenfeld, J.H. Liquefaction-Caused Ground Failure during the February 4, 1976, Guatemala Earthquake; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 1978.
- Plafker, G. Tectonic aspects of the Guatemala 4 February 1976. Science 1976, 193, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayes, G.P.; Myers, E.K.; Dewey, J.W.; Briggs, R.W.; Earle, P.S.; Benz, H.M.; Smoczyk, G.M.; Flamme, H.E.; Barnhart, W.D.; Gold, R.D.; et al. Tectonic Summaries of Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes from 2000 to 2015; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1192; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 2017.
- Benz, H.M.; Tarr, A.C.; Hayes, G.P.; Villaseñor, A.; Furlong, K.P.; Dart, R.L.; Rhea, S. Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2010 Caribbean Plate and Vicinity; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1083-A, Scale 1:8,000,000; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 2011.
- Benito Oterino, M.B.; Torres Fernández, Y. (Eds.) Amenaza sísmica en América Central; Entimema: Madrid, Spain, 2009; p. 371. [Google Scholar]
- Person, W.; Spence, W.; Dewey, J.W. Main event and principal aftershocks from teleseismic data. In The Guatemala Earthquake of February 4, 1976; Espinosa, A.F., Ed.; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Matumoto, T.; Latham, G.V. Aftershocks of the Guatemalan Earthquake of February 4, 1976. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1976, 3, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambraseys, N.N.; Adams, R.D. Large-magnitude Central American earthquakes, 1898–1994. Geophys. J. Int. 1996, 127, 665–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bommer, J.J.; Rodriguez, C.E. Earthquake-induced landslides in central America. Eng. Geol. 2002, 63, 189–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peraldo, H.G.; Montero, P.W. Sismología Histórica de América Central; IPGH: Mexico City, México, 1999; Volume 513, p. 347. [Google Scholar]
- Tanner, J.G.; Shepherd, J.B. Seismic Hazard in Latin America and the Caribbean, Volume I: Project Catalog and Seismic Hazard Maps; IRDC: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1997; p. 143. [Google Scholar]
- White, R.A.; Ligorria, J.P.; Cifuentes, I.L. Seismic history of the Middle America subduction zone along El Salvador, Guatemala, and Chiapas, Mexico: 1526–2000. Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 2004, 375, 379–396. [Google Scholar]
- Global Historical Earthquake Archive—GHEA. Available online: https://www.emidius.eu/GEH/map.php (accessed on 15 July 2019).
- Porfido, S.; Esposito, E.; Spiga, E.; Mazzola, S. Application of the ESI Scale: Case study of the February 4, 1976 Guatemala earthquake. In Proceedings of the 3rd INQUA-IGCP-567 International Workshop on Active Tectonics, Paleoseismology and Archaeoseismology, Morelia, Mexico, 19–24 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Grünthal, G.; Musson, R.; Schwarz, J.; Stucchi, M. European Macroseismic Scale 1998; Cahiers du Centre Européen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie: Luxembourg, 1998; Volume 15. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, P.G.; Pascua, M.A.R.; Pérez-López, R.; Bardaji, T.; Lario, J.; Alfaro, P.; Martínez-Díaz, J.J.; Reicherter, K.; García, J.G.; Giner, J.; et al. Catalogacion de los efectos geologicos y ambientales de los terremotos en Espana en la Escala ESI 2007 y su aplicacion a los estudions paleosismologicos. Geotemas 2008, 6, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar]
- Reicherter, K.; Michetti, A.M.; Silva, P.G. (Eds.) Paleoseismology: Historical and prehistorical records of earthquake ground effects for seismic hazard as-sessment. Geol. Soc. 2009, 316, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, A.F.; Husid, R.; Quesada, A. Intensity and Source Parameters from Filed Observations. The Guatemalan Earthquake of February 4, 1976; U.S. Geological Survey: Leston, VA, USA, 2013; pp. 52–66.
- Papanikolaou, I.D. Uncertainty in intensity assignment and attenuation rela-tionships: How seismic hazard maps can benefit from the implementation of the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI 2007). Quat. Int. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bobrowsky, P.T. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; ISBN 978-90-481-8699-0. [Google Scholar]
- Serva, L. History of the Environmental Seismic Intensity Scale ESI-07. Geosciences 2019, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porfido, S.; Nappi, R.; de Lucia, M.; Gaudiosi, G.; Alessio, G.; Guerrieri, L. The ESI scale, an ethical approach to the evaluation of seismic hazards. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2015, Vienna, Austria, 12–17 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Chunga, K.; Livio, F.; Mulas, M.; OchoaCornejo, F.; Besenzon, D.; Ferrario, M.F.; Michetti, A.M. Earthquake Ground Effects and Intensity of the 16 April 2016 Mw 7.8 Pedernales, Ecuador, Earthquake: Implications for the Source Characterization of Large Subduction Earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2018, 108, 3384–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serva, L.; Vittori, E.; Comerci, V.; Esposito, E.; Guerrieri, L.; Michetti, A.M.; Mohammadioun, B.; Mohammadioun, G.C.; Porfido, S.; Tatevossian, R.E. Earthquake Hazard and the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) Scale. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 173, 1479–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chunga, K.; Livio, F.A.; Martillo, C.; Lara-Saavedra, H.; Ferrario, M.F.; Zevallos, I.; Michetti, A.M. Landslides Triggered by the 2016 Mw 7.8 Pedernales, Ecuador Earthquake: Correlations with ESI-07 Intensity, Lithology, Slope and PGA-h. Geosciences 2019, 9, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, P.G.; Rodríguez-Pascua, M.A.; Giner Robles, J.L.; Élez, J.; Pérez-López, R.; Davila, M.B.B. Catalogue of the Geological Effects of Earthquakes in Spain Based on the ESI-07 Macroseismic Scale: A New Database for Seismic Hazard Analysis. Geosciences 2019, 9, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nappi, R.; Gaudiosi, G.; Alessio, G.; De Lucia, M.; Porfido, S. The environmental effects of the 1743 Salento earthquake (Apulia, southern Italy): A contribution to seismic hazard assessment of the Salento Peninsula. Nat. Hazards 2017, 86, 295–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audemard, F.; Azuma, T.; Baiocco, F.; Baize, S.; Blumetti, A.M.; Brustia, E.; Clague, J.; Comerci, V.; Esposito, E.; Guerrieri, L.; et al. Earthquake Environmental Effect for seismic hazard assessment: the ESI intensity scale and the EEE Catalogue. Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. D’Italia 2015, 97, 1–181. [Google Scholar]
- Mavroulis, S.D.; Fountoulis, I.G.; Skourtsos, E.N.; Lekkas, E.; Papanikolaou, I.D. Seismic intensity assignments for the 2008 Andravida (NW Peloponnese, Greece) strike-slip event (June 8, Mw = 6.4) based on the application of the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI 2007) and the European Macroseismic scale (EMS-98), Geological structure, active tectonics, earthquake environmental effects and damage pattern. Ann. Geophys. 2013, 56, S0681. [Google Scholar]
- Mosquera-Machado, S.; Lalinde-Pulido, C.; Salcedo-Huarto, E.; Michetti, A.M. Ground effects of the October 18, 1992, Murindo Earthquake (NW Colombia), using the Environmental Seismic Intensity Scale (ESI 2007) for the assessment of the intensity. Geol. Soc. 2009, 316, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekkas, E.L. The 12 May 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan, China, earthquake: Macroseismic intensity assessment using the EMS-98 and ESI 2007 Scales and their correlation with the geological structure. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2010, 100, 2791–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornell, C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 1968, 58, 1583–1606. [Google Scholar]
- Gutenberg, B.; Richter, C.R. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 1944, 34, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
- McGuire, R.K.; Arabasz, W.J. An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists; Ward, S.H., Ed.; Society of Exploration Geophysics: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1990; Volume 1, pp. 333–353. [Google Scholar]
- Benito, M.B.; Lindholm, C.; Camacho, E.; Climent, A.; Marroquin, G.; Molina, E.; Rojas, W.; Escobar, J.J.; Talavera, E.; Alvarado, G.E.; et al. A New Evaluation of Seismic Hazard for the Central America Region. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2012, 102, 504–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Climent, Á.; Taylor, W.; Real, M.C.; Strauch, W.; Villagran, M.; Dahle, A.; Bungum, H. Spectral Strong Motion Attenuation in Central America; Internal NORSAR Technical Report: Kjeller, Norway, No. 2–17; 1994; p. 46. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.X.; Zhang, J.; Asano, A.; Ohno, Y.; Oouchi, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ogawa, H.; Irikura, K.; Thio, H.K.; Somerville, P.G. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96, 898–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porfido, S.; Caccavale, M.; Spiga, E.; Sacchi, M. The 1976 Guatemala earthquake revised. Macroseismic data for an appropriate seismic hazard assessment. In Proceedings of the Geo-Risks in the Mediterranean and their Mitigation, Msida, Malta, 20–21 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Steven, K.L. Geotechinical Earthquake Engineering; Prentice-Hall International Series; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
Grid Configuration | Hazard Integration Parameters | ||
---|---|---|---|
Horizontal spacing (∆X) | 0.1° | Distance increment (dr) [km] | 1.0 |
Vertical spacing (∆Y) | 0.1° | Magnitude increment (dm) | 0.5 |
N° of grid points | 780 | Integration distance range [km] | 0÷300 |
Grid area (km2) | ~87,000 | Return periods [Yrs] | 200; 264; 300 |
Lat. range | 14.0, 16.0 | Annual probability of exceedance | 0.5; 0.4; 0.3; 0.2 |
Lon. range | −88.0; −91.5 | Acceleration threshold range (A0) [g] | 1.0E−4 ÷ 2.4 |
Id | Name | N(Mmin)° | b+ | Mmax* | Depth (Km)|| | Area (Km2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | D1_G8 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 6.7 | 10 | 139,028.293 |
2 | D2_G7 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 7.8 | 10 | 76,659.182 |
3 | D3_G6 | 1.32 | 0.82 | 7.8 | 10 | 56,656.057 |
4 | D4_H2 | 0.73 | 1.21 | 6.3 | 10 | 43,918.544 |
5 | D5_G5-S5-H1 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 6.8 | 10 | 38,233.842 |
6 | D6_G3 | 0.18 | 0.67 | 6.7 | 10 | 4810.094 |
7 | D7_G4 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 7.0 | 10 | 9675.350 |
8 | D8_S3 | 1.18 | 0.87 | 7.0 | 10 | 11,967.291 |
9 | D9_G2-S2 | 1.60 | 1.03 | 6.3 | 20 | 26,453.291 |
10 | D10_G1 | 3.51 | 0.92 | 7.5 | 20 | 22,903.907 |
11 | D11_S1 | 9.77 | 1.56 | 7.5 | 20 | 25,079.390 |
12 | D12_H3-N11 | 0.36 | 1.09 | 6.3 | 10 | 80,889.087 |
14 | D14_N12 | 0.44 | 1.21 | 6.2 | 10 | 61,147.947 |
15 | D15_N9-N10 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 6.8 | 10 | 10,023.342 |
16 | D16_S4-N5-H4 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 6.6 | 10 | 3005.915 |
17 | D17_N6-N7 | 1.68 | 0.95 | 6.5 | 10 | 8024.593 |
20 | D20_N3 | 1.35 | 0.88 | 6.8 | 20 | 7934.894 |
21 | N1 | 13.73 | 1.18 | 8 | 10 | 26,047.566 |
NO. | Locality | ESI | Type of Effect ° | MMI | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cabanas | XI | SF, GC | VIII | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks |
2 | Chuarrancho | XI | SF, GC | VIII | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks |
3 | El Progreso | XI | SF, GC | VIII | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks |
4 | Gualan | XI | SF, GC | IX | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks |
5 | Quebradas | XI | SF, GC, L | VIII | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks; Liquefaction phenomena |
6 | Subinal | XI | SF, GC | VIII | Main strike slip fault; ground cracks |
7 | Estancia De La Virgen | X | SM, GC, TL | VIII | Rotational slump/rock-fall avalanche (V < 106 m3), Temp. Lake |
8 | San Martin Jilotepeque | X | SM, GC, L, TL | VIII | Complex rotational slump/eartflow (V = 106 m3), lateral spreads; Temp. Lake |
9 | San Josè Poaquil | X | SM, GC | VIII | Complex block slide/rotational slump/rock-fall avalanche (V = 3.5×106 m3); Temp. Lake |
10 | Puerto Barrios | IX | SF, GS, GC | IX (VI) | Ground compaction |
11 | Finca San Carlos | IX | SF, SM, GC | Rotational slump/avalanche (V < 0.1×106 m3) | |
12 | Guatemala City | IX | SF, SM, GC | VII-VIII | Secondary faults = 20 km long |
13 | Los Choloyos | IX | SM, L, GC | VII-VIII | Block slide/rock-fall avalanche - lateral spreads (0.75 × 106 < V < 106 m3) |
14 | Mixco Area | IX | SF, GC, SM | VII-VIII | Secondary faults = 20 km long |
15 | Rio Blanco | IX | SM, GC | VII | Complex rock-fall, avalanche (V < 0.2×106 m3) |
16 | Rio Cotzibal | IX | SM, GC | VIII | Rotational slump (V < 0.5×106 m3) |
17 | Rio Los Cubes | IX | SM, GC, TL | VIII | Rock-fall avalanche (V < 0.1×106 m3), Temp. Lake |
18 | Rio Naranjo | IX | SM, GC | VIII | Rotational slump (V < 0.3×106 m3) |
19 | Rio Polima | IX | SM, GC | VIII | Block slides (V < 0.2×106 m3); Temp. Lake |
20 | Rio Ruyalchè | IX | SM, GC | VIII | Rotational slump (V < 0.5×106 m3) |
21 | Rio Teocinte | IV | SM, GC | VIII | Rotational slump, rock-fall avalanche (0.3 × 106 < V < 0.5×106 m3) |
22 | Lake Amatitlan (La Playa, El Sauza) | VIII | SM, L, GC, GS | V (VII) | Lateral spreads < 1 km; subsidence 1 m; ground cracks > 100 cm |
23 | Lake Atitlan (Panajachel) | VII | SM, L, GC, GS | V (VI) | Lateral spreads, small subaqueous landslides, subsidence 1 m |
24 | Los Amates | XI | Epicenter |
ID | Town | ESI | MMI | Probabilistic Rock/Soil Crustal SZ [g] | Probabilistic Rock/Soil “D3_G6” SZ [g] | Deterministic Rock-Soil [g] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cabanas | XI | VIII | 0.232–0.311 | 0.223–0.298 | 0.460–0.608 |
2 | Chuarrancho | XI | VIII | 0.308–0.411 | 0.131–0.176 | 0.464–0.614 |
3 | El Progreso | XI | VIII | 0.317–0.422 | 0.106–0.143 | 0.464–0.613 |
4 | Gualan | XI | IX | 0.289–0.386 | 0.131–0.176 | 0.463–0.612 |
5 | Quebradas | XI | VIII | 0.289–0.386 | 0.154–0.206 | 0.468–0.618 |
6 | Subinal | XI | VIII | 0.292–0.390 | 0.157–0.210 | 0.452–0.598 |
7 | Estancia della Virgen | X | VIII | 0.306–0.408 | 0.139–0.186 | 0.301–0.397 |
8 | San Martin Jilotepeque | X | VIII | 0.289–0.385 | 0.127–0.172 | 0.255–0.336 |
9 | San Jose Poaquil | X | VIII | 0.270–0.361 | 0.165–0.221 | 0.235–0.310 |
10 | Puerto Barrios | IX | IX | 0.273–0.365 | 0.173–0.232 | 0.224–0.295 |
11 | Finca San Carlos | IX | VIII | 0.300–0.400 | 0.134–0.180 | 0.174–0.230 |
12 | Guatemala City | IX | VIII | 0.311–0.415 | 0.126–0.169 | 0.198–0.262 |
13 | Los Choloyos | IX | VIII | 0.307–0.410 | 0.123–0.166 | 0.139–0.184 |
14 | Mixco | X | VIII | 0.262–0.350 | 0.123–0.166 | 0.241–0.318 |
15 | Rio Blanco | IX | VII | 0.229–0.306 | 0.223–0.298 | 0.456–0.604 |
16 | Rio Cotzibal | IX | VIII | 0.297–0.397 | 0.152–0.205 | 0.450–0.596 |
17 | Rio Los Cubes | IX | VIII | 0.301–0.402 | 0.146–0.196 | 0.210–0.277 |
18 | Rio Naranjo | IX | VIII | 0.297–0.396 | 0.146–0.196 | 0.248–0.327 |
19 | Rio Polima | IX | VIII | 0.243–0.325 | 0.178–0.238 | 0.272–0.358 |
20 | Rio Ruyalche | IX | VIII | 0.230–0.307 | 0.215–0.287 | 0.351–0.463 |
21 | Rio Teocinte | IX | VIII | 0.233–0.311 | 0.219–0.292 | 0.225–0.297 |
22 | Lake Amatitlan | VIII | VII | 0.239–0.320 | 0.187–0.251 | 0.143–0.189 |
23 | Lake Atitlan | VII | VII | 0.264–0.352 | 0.171–0.228 | 0.125–0.166 |
24 | Los Amate | XI | IX | 0.235–0.314 | 0.202–0.270 | 0.458–0.606 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Caccavale, M.; Sacchi, M.; Spiga, E.; Porfido, S. The 1976 Guatemala Earthquake: ESI Scale and Probabilistic/Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Approaches. Geosciences 2019, 9, 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090403
Caccavale M, Sacchi M, Spiga E, Porfido S. The 1976 Guatemala Earthquake: ESI Scale and Probabilistic/Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Approaches. Geosciences. 2019; 9(9):403. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090403
Chicago/Turabian StyleCaccavale, Mauro, Marco Sacchi, Efisio Spiga, and Sabina Porfido. 2019. "The 1976 Guatemala Earthquake: ESI Scale and Probabilistic/Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Approaches" Geosciences 9, no. 9: 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090403