Next Article in Journal
Spatial Evolution of the Chromium Contamination in Soils from the Assopos to Thiva Basin and C. Evia (Greece) and Potential Source(s): Anthropogenic versus Natural Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Verde Macael: A Serpentinite Wrongly Referred to as a Marble
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nacre in Molluscs from the Ordovician of the Midwestern United States

Geosciences 2013, 3(1), 114-139; doi:10.3390/geosciences3010114

Review
Evolution of Endemic Species, Ecological Interactions and Geographical Changes in an Insular Environment: A Case Study of Quaternary Mammals of Sicily (Italy, EU)
Antonella Cinzia Marra
Department of Physics and of Earth Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 31, Messina 98166, Italy; E-Mail: amarra@unime.it
Received: 12 December 2012; in revised form: 21 January 2013 / Accepted: 21 January 2013 /
Published: 5 February 2013

Abstract

: The Quaternary mammals of Sicily are well known, and five faunal complexes have been distinguished on the basis of bioevents (extinctions and new arrivals) and evolution of endemic species. It is clear that the composition of mammal faunas is strictly related to the dispersal ability of each species and to the paleogeography of the area. Until now, researches have chiefly attributed paleogeographical changes as controlling these dispersals: the sea strait between the island and the Italian peninsula has had different widths and depths over time, operating different kinds of filters on the spreading of terrestrial mammals. Moreover, Sicily and its nearby mainland underwent changes in paleogeography. Some incongruence in bioevents has been attributed to the filter operated by the marine strait, which could have acted in differential ways on large and small mammals. However, the roles of ecological interactions among vertebrate species and their control on bioevents have been greatly underestimated. In this critical review, changes in mammals’ associations are reconsidered not only in terms of biochronology and dispersal ability of taxa through the marine strait, evolution of endemic features, in addition to the paleogeography of the island, but also considering the ecological role of each species and the interactions among the species with each faunal complex.
Keywords:
Sicily; mammals; Quaternary; endemism; island paleobiogeography; paleoecology; biochronology

1. Introduction

In the last few decades, knowledge of the Quaternary mammals of the island of Sicily has increased, allowing new considerations of time periods and systems of faunal dispersals from the surrounding continental areas [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The first mammal community, from the Early Pleistocene age, has been recorded in only one site. Its composition is very interesting and needs more investigation [1,2]. Later, Sicily experienced four different faunal complexes, characterized by the extinction of some species followed by the dispersal of newcomers from peninsular Italy [1,2,5]. Three faunal complexes include endemic species, evolved in insular conditions. Changes in faunal composition are related to dispersal events, followed by isolation phases, which induced processes of endemism in the pioneer species [2,5]. Dispersals depend on paleogeographical conditions and on dispersal abilities of the precursor species [2,5,6]. While the main dispersal direction came from Peninsular Italy, some of the earliest arrivals (dubitatively attributed to Late Miocene) from North Africa also need to be considered [4].

The spreading of mammals from the Italian mainland to Sicily has not only been shaped by the sea barrier of the Strait of Messina, but also by the physiography of Calabria, the southernmost region of peninsular Italy (Figure 1; [6]). During Early Pleistocene, Calabria and Sicily were fragmented in small islands, constituting an archipelago [6]. In the course of Middle Pleistocene, the uplift of inner and coastal plains determined a geographical setting more and more similar to present day [6]. Calabria has been the main filter to mammal spreading, especially in the first half of Pleistocene. During late Middle and Late Pleistocene, Calabria acted as a filter for its complex physiography and latitudinal extension. As a matter of fact, all mammals present in late Middle and Late Pleistocene of Calabria spread to Sicily, with the exception of a few species of prairie or mountain environments [6]. Moreover, faunal assemblages of Calabria include a lower number of species with respect to central and northern Italy [6]. Some species of Sicily are present on Malta [5]. Maltese faunal associations are impoverished with respect to Sicilian ones and include mammals which are thought to easily cross sea barriers.

Geosciences 03 00114 g001 1024
Figure 1. Map of Mediterranean area with locations of the regions quoted in the text.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Map of Mediterranean area with locations of the regions quoted in the text.
Geosciences 03 00114 g001 1024

Dispersal of mammals from the mainland to the islands depends on their body structure and behavior, in addition to geographical setting [7,8]. Good fliers and good swimmers clearly have better chances of reaching islands far from the mainland, while animals with more or less pronounced dispersal ability can disperse with some limitations. On the island, pioneer species can evolve adaptations, such as size changes and allometries, giving rise to endemic species or subspecies. They can lose their dispersal ability (e.g., flying attitude) or their defensive adaptations. The character of insular faunas needs to be investigated, not only as changing in species attributes, but also as features of the whole faunal association [7,8]. Usually, faunal associations on an island are affected by impoverishment in terms of biodiversity and by ecological disharmony [7,8].

According to Simpson [7], Dermitzakis and Sondaar [8] and Sondaar et al. [9], the composition of insular faunas is related to the way of dispersal: an ecologically balanced fauna, similar to the mainland one, results from a broad land connection, which acts as a corridor, allowing interchanges from one region to another. An impoverished but balanced fauna with absent or slight endemism is related to a land connection with obstacles, acting as a filter to dispersal, where spread is probable for some taxa only. An unbalanced fauna with mainland elements is related to a filter (“pendel route”), such as a narrow sea strait, which is easily crossed by good swimmers and flyers; an endemic fauna with endemic features is related to accidental (‘‘sweepstake’’) transit, as across a wide sea barrier, and spread occurs accidentally and for some taxa only.

In the case of the Quaternary mammals of Sicily, it is possible to indicate the dispersal ability of mainland ancestors and the endemism degree of insular species, as well as impoverishment and ecological balance of each faunal complex [5]. As can be inferred by paleogeographical reconstructions, physiographic changes of Calabria and Sicily determined different possibilities of mammal spreading through time [2,6,10]. Reconstruction of times and ways of dispersal from the mainland, with observations on paleogeography and endemism, makes up the larger part of the literature. However, paleoecology has been considered only in terms of species autoecology and ecological balance of associations [1,4,5]. Very few studies about ecological relationships among species and stability of communities have been conducted.

The aim of this paper is to present the current state of knowledge and to raise some critical observations and possible re-interpretations. The first step is a critical review of mammal biochronology, being a reference to investigate paleobiogeography, endemism and paleoecology of Quaternary mammals of Sicily. Then, available data are used to give a picture of community structure and interspecific interactions on an island subject to relevant changes in geography and environment. The review of data sourcing from different branches of geology and paleontology, as well as from genetics, enables interesting considerations on time periods and systems of dispersals, on evolution of endemism, and on ecological interactions. It is worth noting that paleobiogeography of Sicily can be ascribed to different types of islands, as a consequence of its deep changes in geography, source availability, and possibilities of mammal dispersals.

2. Review of Biochronology

The Quaternary vertebrate fauna of Sicily is presently arranged into five Faunal Complexes (FCs), according to Bonfiglio et al. [1,2] and subsequent integrations [4,5,11]. Data from the cited literature are listed below (obsolete scientific names are rectified in square brackets). Mammal associations and ages are reported; endemic species are indicated by “E”. Although it is not applicable to island associations, the correspondence to the biochronological chart of Italy [12,13] is indicated, being significant to timespan and changes in mainland faunal associations.

-

Monte Pellegrino Faunal Complex

Mammal association: Asoriculus burgioi (E), Mustelercta (=Pannonictis) arzilla (E), Apodemus maximus (E), Leithia sp. (E), Maltamys sp. (E), Pellegrinia panormensis (E), Hypolagus peregrinus (E). The Monte Pellegrino FC is based on a single faunal assemblage coming from a karst cavity with a problematic depositional setting.

Age: Pliocene–Early Pleistocene according to Thaler [14]; Early Pleistocene, according to Burgio and Fiore [15]; Late Villafranchian Mammal Age of the biochronological chart of Italy.

-

Elephas falconeri Faunal Complex

Mammal association: Crocidura esuae (E), Lutra trinacriae (E), Vulpes sp. (dubitative), Ursus sp. (“small bear,” dubitative), Elephas falconeri [recte Palaeoloxodon falconeri] (E), Leithia cartei (E), Leithia melitensis (E), Maltamys gollcheri (E), undetermined bats. The mammal fauna is associated with diversified herpetofauna and avifauna.

Age: early Middle Pleistocene, probably MIS 22–11; Middle and Late Galerian of the biochronological chart of Italy.

-

Elephas mnaidriensis Faunal Complex

Mammal association: Crocidura esuae (E), Erinaceus europaeus (E), Lutra trinacriae (E), Crocuta crocuta spelaea, Panthera leo, Canis lupus, Ursus arctos, Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis] (E), Sus scrofa, Hippopotamus pentlandi (E), Cervus elaphus siciliae (E), Dama carburangelensis (E), Bos primigenius siciliae (E), Bison priscus siciliae (E), Leithia melitensis (E), Maltamys wiedincitensis (E), Microtus (Terricola) sp. In the opinion of Petruso et al. [11], Bison priscus siciliae is erroneously attributed to this faunal complex and must be considered present only in the “Grotta San Teodoro-Pianetti” FC.The mammal fauna is associated with diversified herpetofauna and avifauna.

Age: late Middle Pleistocene, probably MIS 10–4; Aurelian Mammal Age of the biochronological chart of Italy.

-

Grotta San Teodoro—Pianetti Faunal Complex

Mammal association: Erinaceus europaeus, Crocidura cf. sicula (E), Crocuta crocuta spelaea, Canis lupus, Vulpes vulpes, Ursus arctos, Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis] (E), Sus scrofa, Cervus elaphus siciliae (E), Bos primigenius siciliae (E), Bison priscus siciliae (E), Equus hydruntinus, Apodemus cf. A. sylvaticus, Microtus (Terricola) savii (E).

Mammal fauna is associated with herpetofauna and avifauna.

Age: Late Pleistocene; Grotta San Teodoro: 32,000 ± 4000 yr BP (230Th/234U dating on a concretion, Bonfiglio et al. [16]; late Aurelian (Last Glacial cycle, more precisely) according to the biochronology of peninsular Italy.

-

Castello Faunal Complex

Mammal association: Erinaceus europaeus, Crocidura cf. C. sicula (E), Canis lupus, Vulpes vulpes, Equus hydruntinus, Sus scrofa, Cervus elaphus, Bos primigenius, Equus ferus, Microtus (Terricola) savii, Apodemus cf. sylvaticus, Lepus europaeus.

Age: late MIS 3—early MIS 2; late Aurelian (late Glacial) Mammal Age of the biochronological chart of Italy.

The arrangement of the vertebrate fauna of Sicily proposed in several papers by the research teams coordinated by Bonfiglio and Masini [1,2,4] started from new finds and stratigraphical data and followed, among the others, the significant papers by Vaufrey [17], Kotsakis [18] and Burgio [19].

Vaufrey [17] distinguished a first upper level attributed to Upper Paleolithic and a second lower level named “terre rouge à elephants” (=red soil with elephant remains). At Luparello cave, Vaufrey excavated elephant remains having two different sizes, interpreted as two subsequent steps of dwarfism in the Sicilian elephants, moving from the forerunner Elephas antiquus. This theory has been accepted for almost 50 years.

In 1979, Tassos Kotsakis [18] provided the first modern chronological study of the fossil vertebrates of Sicily. Kotsakis [18] grouped the known local faunal associations into four stages, named by the most representative site, and correlated them to the peninsular Italy biochronology, at that time still in progress [20] and here reported only for “historical” purposes. Kotsakis [18] defined five faunal “Stages”, from the oldest to the youngest one (obsolete scientific names are rectified in square brackets):

-

Monte Pellegrino Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Pellegrinia panormensis associated with Leithia sp., a murid, a leporid, and a mustelid); type site: Monte Pellegrino (Palermo); Age: Ruscinian and/or Villafranchian and/or Galerian.

-

Capo Tindari Stage: fauna characterized by the presence of a large sized Hippopotamus sp. associated with Megaceros messinae (probably attributable to Dama carburangelensis) and Leithia; type site: Capo Tindari (Messina); Age: Galerian or Flaminian or Pariolin.

-

Maccagnone Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis] associated with Cervus siciliae [recte Cervus elaphus siciliae], Leithia melitensis, Leithia cartei), divided into two phases by the presence or absence of Hippopotamus pentlandi:

(a) Hippopotamus pentlandi is present; type site: Maccagnone Cave (Palermo); Age: Pariolin, Rianin, Maspinian.

(b)Hippopotamus pentlandi is absent; type site: Carburangeli Cave (Palermo); Age: end of Maspinian, Pontinian.

-

Spinagallo Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Elephas falconeri [recte Palaeoloxodon falconeri] associated with Leithia melitensis and Leithia cartei); type site: Spinagallo cave (Syracuse); Age: Middle Pontinian.

-

Castello Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Equus hydruntinus associated with Cervus elaphus and Homo sapiens; elephants are absent); type site: Castello cave (Palermo); Age: Upper Pontinain.

New stratigraphic evidences from Alcamo [21] and Comiso [22], also supported by absolute dating [23], assigned to the Spinagallo Stage an earlier age than the Maccagnone one. The “classical” interpretation was based on the derivation of Elephas falconeri [recte Palaeoloxodon falconeri] from Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis], through an evolutionary process characterized by a progressive reduction in size. On the contrary, the new data were consistent with two different arrivals of elephants and two different dwarfing processes on the forerunners.

In light of these new data, Burgio [19] redefined the stages by Kotsakis [18] (obsolete scientific names are rectified in square brackets; locations of type sites are in Figure 2).

Geosciences 03 00114 g002 1024
Figure 2. Locations of type-sites representative of faunal complexes of Sicily.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. Locations of type-sites representative of faunal complexes of Sicily.
Geosciences 03 00114 g002 1024
-

Monte Pellegrino Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Pellegrinia panormensis). Faunal associations: Apodemus maximus, Maltamys cf. gollcheri, Pellegrinia panormensis, Hypolagus sp. [recte Hypolagus peregrines], Soricidae gen. et sp. indet., Mustelercta arzilla [recte Mustelercta (= Pannonictis) arzilla]

-

Spinagallo Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Elephas falconeri [recte Palaeoloxodon falconeri]). Faunal association: Leithia melitensis, Leithia cartei, Crocidura esuae, Lutra trinacriae, Elephas falconeri [recte Palaeoloxodon falconeri]. Age: 500 ka by absolute dating [23]; Mindel-Riss.

-

Maccagnone Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis]). Faunal association: Leithia melitensis, Maltamys wiedinticitensis, Crocidura esuae, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, Panthera leo spelaea, Canis lupus, Ursus arctos, Elephas antiquus [recte Palaeoloxodon antiques], Elephas mnaidriensis [recte Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis], Elephas sp., Sus scrofa, Hippopotamus pentlandi, Hippopotamus sp., Cervus elaphus siciliae, Dama dama [recte Dama carburangelensis], Megaceros (s.l.) carburangelensis [recte Dama carburangelensis], Bos primigenius siciliae, Bison priscus siciliae. Age: 200 ka by absolute dating [23]; attributable to MIS 5.

-

Castello Stage (fauna characterized by the presence of Equus hydruntinus). Faunal association: Hystrix cristata, Pytimis savii [recte Microtus (Terricola) savii], Lepus europaeus, Erinaceus europaeus, Crocidura sp., Lynx lynx, Felis silvestris, Canis lupus, Vulpes vulpes, Equus caballus [recte Equus ferus], Equus hydruntinus, Sus scrofa, Cervus elaphus elaphus, Bos primigenius primigenius, Homo sapiens sapiens. Age: some millennia before Holocene (10 ka), Upper Paleolithic.

3. Paleobiogeography, Endemism and Ecological Interactions

The historical review of biochronology is helpful in understanding the current biochronological framework of Sicily. Papers by Bonfiglio, Masini and colleagues [1,2,3,4] greatly improved the current knowledge and represent a good reference, as the studies were based on broad datasets. However, some criticism does exist. The authors correctly abandoned the name “stage” and used the most appropriate term “Faunal Complex” (FC), which is synonymous with “faunal unit.” Faunal complexes are represented by non-overlapping faunal associations well defined in time, space, and ecological attributes (according to the definition of faunal units by Tedford [24]). The authors used new denominations for faunal complexes that, in spite of new data, were substantially coincident with the old “stages” stated by Burgio [19] in 1997: Elephas falconeri FC for the Spinagallo Stage; Elephas mnaidriensis FC for the Maccagnone Stage. However, these denominations are inadequate for several reasons:

-

faunal complexes are usually stated on the basis of Local Faunal Units (LFAs) and are named by the most representative site [12,13];

-

denominations by species names are unusual; moreover, in this case, scientific names are obsolete, being Elephas falconeri and Elephas mnaidriensis currently named Palaeoloxodon falconeri and Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis, respectively [25];

-

the Grotta San Teodoro-Pianetti FC proposed in 2001 [26] and updated in 2008 [16] includes Palaeloxodon mnaidriensis; as a consequence, this latter species is not exclusive of the previous FC;

-

the names indicated by Burgio [19] are maintained in the other FCs: Monte Pellegrino FC and Castello FC;

-

Spinagallo and Maccagnone caves are particularly significant in the fossil record of mammals of Sicily.

The old names of the “stages” by Burgio, widely coincident to the updated faunal complexes, can be considered still valid: the Elephas falconeri FC can be renamed Spinagallo FC, and the Elephas mnaidriensis FC can be renamed Maccagnone FC. These denominations do respect criteria of priority and uniformity, and avoid the use of obsolete scientific names and of a non-exclusive species to indicate a faunal complex, as in the case of Elephas mnaidriensis FC. Moreover, the denomination Grotta San Teodoro-Pianetti faunal complex, named by the two LFAs known at present, is unusual and could be simplified as San Teodoro FC, the San Teodoro cave being the most representative site. Another criticism is in the use of both small and large mammals to state faunal complexes and will be a matter of discussion in this paper.

Figure 3 represents a new proposal for a biochronological chart based on the large mammals of Sicily, correlated with the standard mammal biochronology of Italy, the marine isotopic signal, and geochronology. Monte Pellegrino FC includes mainly small mammals and is not included in Figure 3. The proposed denominations of faunal complexes will be used in the rest of the paper, with replaced ones in brackets (only in headings).

Geosciences 03 00114 g003 1024
Figure 3. Biochronological chart of the faunal complexes of Sicily, correlated with the standard mammal biochronology of Italy, the marine isotopic signal, and geochronology.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Biochronological chart of the faunal complexes of Sicily, correlated with the standard mammal biochronology of Italy, the marine isotopic signal, and geochronology.
Geosciences 03 00114 g003 1024

3.1. Monte Pellegrino Faunal Complex

The Monte Pellegrino faunal complex is likely from the early Pleistocene age and its fauna is endemic, unbalanced, and poorly diversified, mainly composed by small mammals (Figure 4).

During Early Pleistocene, Sicily was made up of two islands, and the volcano Etna had not yet emerged; Calabria also consisted of two small islands separated by narrow sea straits, while the Strait of Messina was wider than today (Figure 4) [6]. Malta was emergent [27].

Different degrees of endemism, mainly consisting of enlargements of size, have been observed in species composing the FC. Asoriculus burgioi, Apodemus maximus and Maltamys sp. have marked endemic features and are dubitatively considered relics of an undocumented previous fauna, dubitatively spread during Messinian [28,29]. Thaler [14] reported also Leithia sp. from Monte Pellegrino. Daams and De Bruijn [30] considered an ancient form of Leithia as the precursor of Leithia and Maltamys species present in Middle and Late Pleistocene of Sicily and Malta. The authors identified the ancestor of Leithia (and Maltamys) in a form of Eliomys sp. probably dispersed during Messinian (late Miocene). Pellegrinia panormensis has very marked endemic features and has been compared to African Ctenodactilids [14]. Hypolagus peregrinus and Mustelercta (=Pannonictis) arzilla show moderate endemism, and are considered affine to European forms, dubitatively related to an Early Pleistocene dispersal [15,31]. There are no fossil records of mammals from the Early Pleistocene of Malta and Calabria [6,27].

Geosciences 03 00114 g004 1024
Figure 4. Paleobiogeography of the Monte Pellegrino faunal complex.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 4. Paleobiogeography of the Monte Pellegrino faunal complex.
Geosciences 03 00114 g004 1024

3.2. Spinagallo Faunal Complex (Formerly Elephas falconeri FC)

The Spinagallo faunal complex is early Middle Pleistocene in age and is strongly impoverished in number of species (Figure 3), as well as unbalanced in ecological composition [2,5].

During early Middle Pleistocene (Figure 5), Sicily was still consisting of two small islands [32]; the Strait of Messina persisted as a sea strait for the entire Quaternary, with some variations in wideness [10,33]. During Middle Pleistocene, a general uplift influenced all of Calabria, which progressively attained its present shape ([6] and references therein). During early Middle Pleistocene, Calabria was a land not easy to cross, characterized by high mountains and few extended plains [6]. Malta was emerged [27].

Palaeoloxodon antiquus, probable ancestor of Palaeoloxodon falconeri [25,34], is recorded in northern Calabria, in the “Mercure A” site [35], attributed to the Middle Galerian. Praemegaceros cf. P. verticornis and Dama cf. D. clactoniana, recorded at “Mercure A” site, did not disperse to Sicily [6]. There are no other records of mammals from Calabria. On Malta, Palaeoloxodon falconeri is associated with Maltamys gollcheri, Maltamys wiedincitensis (dubitative), Crocidura esuae and Lutra euxena. The Maltese otter is the only species not shared in common with Sicily. Moreover, in Sicily, Maltamys wiedincitensis, considered a descendant of M. gollcheri, is present in the younger Maccagnone FC. Zammit Maempel and De Bruijn [36] consider Maltamys gollcheri as a junior synonym of Leithia cartei, while Masini et al. [4] consider Maltamys sp.–wiedincitensisgollcheri as chronospecies and Leithia cartei as a distinct species. In both cases, endemic dormice (Leithia and Maltamys) seem to be derived by taxa recorded at Monte Pellegrino, it follows, therefore, that their ancestors reached Sicily and Malta before Quaternary. The probable ancestor might have been a form of Eliomys because the genus was present in both continents during Miocene, though this is not enough to indicate African or European origin [37]. Since dormice are susceptible to passive transport on natural rafts and since their phylogeny is uncertain, it is still not clear if their forerunners reached Sicily from Africa or from Italy.

Geosciences 03 00114 g005 1024
Figure 5. Paleobiogeography of the Spinagallo faunal complex.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 5. Paleobiogeography of the Spinagallo faunal complex.
Geosciences 03 00114 g005 1024

The shrew Crocidura esuae is considered by Kotsakis [38], Esu et al. [39], and Sarà [40] to be the ancestor of Crocidura sicula, a species present in the fossil record since Late Pleistocene (San Teodoro FC) and still living in Sicily, while it is considered to be the descendant of a newcomer that arrived in the Late Pleistocene, according to Masini et al. [4]. The debate is still open, but genetic and morphological data indicate marked differences among Crocidura sicula and species from the Italian peninsula and, alternatively, strong affinities with living afro-tropical forms [41,42]. Studies on DNA provided by Dubey et al. [43] consider Crocidura sicula to be the descendant of the Saharan shrew Crocidura tarfayaensis, with a split between Saharan and Siculo-Maltese clades dated to Messinian. Taxa possibly related to Crocidura esuae have not been recorded in the Monte Pellegrino FC, although a Late Miocene spreading from North Africa cannot be excluded. Therefore, this small mammal fauna has been long persistent on Sicily and its spreading, probably by floating on natural rafts, might have occurred before Quaternary in a quite different paleogeographical setting.

Large mammals reached Sicily by swimming, most likely from peninsular Italy. The forerunners of the dwarf elephant, Palaeoloxodon falconeri, and the endemic otter, Lutra trinacriae, were good swimmers. Living elephants have been observed swimming the seas, mainly in the Indian Ocean, in order to reach islands [44,45]. They can swim for long distances, searching a new habitat, and are able to see islands on the horizon and to smell edible food resources [44]. Otters have good dispersal ability and they can spread to islands as far as 30 km [46]. Therefore, it can be deduced that the ancestors of Palaeoloxodon falconeri and Lutra trinacriae reached Sicily and small islands of Calabria by swimming. Palaeoloxodon falconeri underwent a strong reduction in size, being an adult male high about 120 cm at the scapula, and heavy at about 170 kg [47]. Moreover, the dwarf elephant shows important changes in skull morphology and body proportions [47]. Lutra trinacriae was moderately reduced in size, probably as a consequence of the permanence of its populations on the island [48]. Chiroptera are recorded but still undetermined [2]. Bats, birds, reptiles, and amphibians associated with mammals enable some paleoecological considerations.

Small vertebrates other than mammals that probably arrived by transport on natural rafts are: Amphibians (Bufo cf. B. viridis, Hyla sp., and Discoglossus cf. D. pictus); Reptiles (Chelonia: Emys orbicularis, Testudo hermanni, and a giant form of Geochelone sp.); Squamata: (Coluber cf. viridiflavus, Natrix sp., Lacerta viridis and the giant endemic Lacerta siculomelitensis) [2].

Avifauna was diversified, with 66 species [2,49]. Among birds, 24 migrant species have spent winters in Sicily [49,50]. Fresh waters have been available, as indicated by the presence of Gruiformes and Anseriformes [50]. The presence of sedentary birds such as Piciformes, Colombiformes and Passeriformes indicates permanent availability of fruits, seeds and invertebrates [50]. Some endemites were present: the giant crane, Grus melitensis, the dwarf swan Cygnus equitum, the Strigiformes Tyto mourerchauvireae and Aegolius martes, both giant species, and Athene trinacriae, which had lengthened forelimbs [49]. Tyto mourerchauvireae seem to have evolved from T. balearica, an owl common in the Mediterranean area, and was at the top of the food chain [51]. This species preyed upon the three species of Gliridae, the shrew Crocidura, and several birds [51]. The presence in Sicily of large-sized Gliridae could have favored the evolution of T. mourerchauvireae, which became extinct in the Maccagnone FC, probably for the arrival of Bubo bubo [51].

Guglielmo and Marra [50] proposed a reconstruction of the food chain. During the night, Strigiformes preyed on small vertebrates; in daylight, Colombiformes, Passeriformes, and small vertebrates were preyed upon by Falconiformes. Birds’ eggs and nestlings might have been eaten by reptiles, dormice and, occasionally, by otters. Elephants did not have had predators and intra-guild competitors. Their strong reduction in size could be related to these peculiar paleocological conditions, and perhaps it occurred through anticipation of the sexual maturity and shortening of the gestational period [52]. In the opinion of Palombo [47], the strong reduction in size of Palaeoloxodon falconeri could also be related to the availability of niches typical of medium- and large-sized herbivores. The reduced size allowed the persistence of P. falconeri populations with a number of individuals adequate to avoid extinction. Moreover, a smaller body mass reduced the deep modification of vegetation typically produced by elephants.

3.3. Maccagnone Faunal Complex (Formerly Elephas mnaidriensis FC)

The Maccagnone faunal complex is late Middle Pleistocene in age and almost completely renewed with respect to the Spinagallo FC (Figure 3, Figure 6). Among small mammals, Leithia melitensis and Crocidura esuae persist from the previous FC; Maltamys gollcheri evolves in Maltamys wiedincitensis [2,4,5]. Microtus (Terricola) sp. has “subterraneomorph” characteristics, similar to the European Microtus (Terricola) subterraneus and could have spread to Sicily during MIS 6 [53]. The dwarf elephant Palaeoloxodon falconeri became extinct, while Lutra trinacriae persists. Large mammal fauna is renewed and represented by an association impoverished but balanced and diversified, with a moderate endemism.

Geosciences 03 00114 g006 1024
Figure 6. Paleobiogeography of the Maccagnone faunal complex.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 6. Paleobiogeography of the Maccagnone faunal complex.
Geosciences 03 00114 g006 1024

In the late Middle Pleistocene, the geography of Sicily, Malta and Calabria was attaining its present-day shape, with an extension of inner and coastal plains (Figure 6). The arrival of several new taxa of European origin can be related to favorable conditions of dispersal through the Strait of Messina [2,5,47]. Dispersals might be related to several events that occurred during the stadial oscillations of the sea level in late Middle Pleistocene (MIS 10, MIS 8, and MIS 6 [47]), or to a single event that occurred 0.3 Ma (MIS 8 [4]). A combination of both the tectonic uplift of Calabria and Sicily and low-stand phases of the sea level likely reduced the relative distance between the two coastlines of the Messina Strait (Figure 6). The strait has been crossable by large mammals with different dispersal abilities, ranging from good swimmers (elephant, cervids) to animals with more or less limited swimming ability, such as bovids and carnivores.

The long-term persistence of the small mammal fauna has been attributed to the absence of new competitors, due to a geographical filter active in the Strait of Messina such as a partially emerged sea floor or a swampy lagoon system, crossable only by large mammals [2,4,5]. However, this hypothesis is not easily sustainable, because of the fact that small mammals can follow more dispersal ways than large ones can; they can disperse simply by walking, and also on natural rafts. Furthermore, there is no reason why a partially emerged bridge cannot be crossed by small mammals. And there are no geological data to support the existence of this peculiar land connection. Paleoecology, discussed in the following, can be the key.

The poor quality of the fossil record in the Middle Pleistocene of Calabria allows limited investigations on the dispersal of the precursors of the Maccagnone FC [6]. However, the latest Middle Pleistocene fossil assemblages from Calabria include all the large mammals considered precursors of Middle Pleistocene endemic species of Sicily [6]. Their presence in Calabria, when they spread to Sicily thereby originating the Maccagnone FC, can only be hypothesized. More than one dispersal might have occurred. As a matter of fact, “normal” sized elephants found in Sicily at Contrada Fusco (MIS 5) can be interpreted as newcomers, or at least as strong intraspecific variations [47]. It is not difficult to imagine elephants that swam several times across the Messina Strait. Among mammals of the Maccagnone FC, only elephant and cervids had swimming attitude, while hippopotamus, wild boar and bear had a good attitude to humid/freshwater environments. Other mammals did not swim, and therefore paleogeography might have been favorable to their dispersal.

On the basis of the available geological and paleontological data, Marra [6] hypothesized a partially emerged “stepping stone” way in the Strait of Messina, available during regressive phases. Mammals could have reach the island crossing the “sill,” an area of the Strait of Messina that is currently deep (80–100 m offshore Sicily) and irregular in its western portion, though shallower (60–100 m offshore Calabria) and smoothed in its eastern part [54]. In correspondence to the “sill,” the Strait of Messina is at present 3 km wide. The sea strait had a maximum wideness in Upper Pliocene–Lower Pleistocene; later, it underwent a sensible narrowing, with morphology very similar to present day [10,33]. The invertebrate fossils and extant forms of marine environment indicate the persistence of elevated hydrodynamics in the Strait of Messina, which exclude the emergence of a land bridge for all Quaternary until now [10,33]. The tectono-sedimentary evolution of the “sill” indicates a sensible uplift from the late Middle Pleistocene [10]. The emergence of small areas of the “sill” during sea-lowering phases occurred since late Middle Pleistocene would be consistent with geopaleontological data and could have allowed “stepping stone” dispersals [6]. Also, the possibility of a “pendel route” (sensu Dermitzakis and Sondaar [8]) has to be taken into account, considering that the Strait of Messina was a narrow sea barrier that enabled the transit of mammals with reduced dispersal abilities. Low-stand phases might be responsible of the faunal renewal on Malta. The faunal association recorded in the late Middle Pleistocene of Malta is impoverished with respect to Sicily and includes Leithia cartei, Maltamys wiedincitensis, Lutra euxena, Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis, Hippopotamus melitensis, and Crocidura esuae [5,27]. Small mammals persist, while the dwarf elephant is replaced by the new species spread from Sicily. The Maltese hippopotamus is considered the descendant of Hippopotamus pentlandi of Sicily [5,27]. Connections between Sicily and Malta were occasional and submitted to a strong filter, and only two species with aquatic attitude (elephant, hippopotamus) reached the island. On the other hand, the small island did not offer to possible newcomers source availability comparable to that of Sicily.

The increasing biodiversity, the moderate endemism of the herbivores, and the presence of non-endemic carnivores (with top predators among them) observed in the Maccagnone FC are indicative of a large island with diversified environments in addition to a paleogeography enabling the dispersion of species with different dispersal abilities [6].

On the island, species evolved endemic features. Large herbivores were moderately modified with respect to the mainland ancestors, showing a slight reduction in size, while carnivores did not evolve endemic features and included top predators [1,2,5]. Medium-sized ruminants (Cervus elaphus siciliae and Dama carburangelensis) reduced their size (intended as linear dimensions of the skeleton) by about 20%–25% with respect to their ancestors (Cervus elaphus and Dama dama cf tiberina); the large ruminant Bos primigenius siciliae reduced its size by about 20% with respect to Bos primigenius [1,2,55,56]. Endemic features observed in non-ruminant herbivores are of different degrees. Hippopotamus pentlandi had not marked endemic features and a reduction of about 10%–15% in linear dimensions with respect to the ancestor H. amphibius [57]. Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis had marked allometries and a strong reduction in size, about 50%–60% with respect to the ancestor Palaeoloxodon antiquus [25]; some morphological modifications are related to dwarfing processes, but some others might be related to ecological adaptations (i.e., fusion of radius and ulna; [25]). Omnivorous (Sus scrofa and Ursus arctos) and carnivorous (Canis lupus, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, Panthera leo spelaea) large mammals did not modify their size [2,4,5,58].

Small mammal fauna persisted from the Spinagallo FC, with only one new arrival. The reason for this long persistence might be found in paleoecology. Although sustaining the existence of a filtering land bridge, which prevented the spreading of small mammals, Masini et al. [4] did admit that longer survivorship of small mammals might be due to the equilibrium they established with predators, or to their prolificacy and food requirements. Guglielmo and Marra [50] argued that small mammals could have established deep-rooted populations that defeated possible newcomer competition. Moreover, they might have not been affected by the extinction of their primary predator Tyto mourerchauvireae, replaced by Bubo bubo, having similar body size and predatory attitude [49]. The stability of small mammal populations can also be attributable to the absence of possible secondary predators (i.e., small carnivores) that might have perturbed their ecological equilibrium [50]. It is worth noting that endemic Gliridae disappeared when Vulpes vulpes, their possible secondary predator, entered the island and were replaced by species smaller in size (San Teodoro FC). The life of secondary predators did not depend on the survival of their secondary prey, so the red fox might have caused the extinction of endemic Gliridae [50]. Moreover, small mammals can risk overpopulation (especially in conditions of equilibrium with predators), and the evolution of large body size, probably accompanied by lower metabolic rate and greater life duration, might have been a good life strategy [50]. Furthermore, ecological niches available for possible newcomers were stably occupied.

Among small vertebrates, the amphibian Discoglussus cf. pictus and the Reptiles Emys orbicularis, Testudo hermanni and Lacerta siculomelitensis persisted, while the giant turtle Geochelone sp. became extinct [2]. The other amphibians (Bufo cf. viridis, Hyla sp.) and Reptiles (Coluber cf. viridiflavus, Natrix sp., Lacerta viridis) present in the previous fauna have not been recorded. However, molecular data by their living relatives seem to indicate their long persistence in Sicily [50].

The avifauna underwent several changes [49]. The number of migrant birds increased, with taxa preferring fresh waters. Podicipediformes and Pelicaniformes, adapted to marine waters, dispersed to Sicily. Anseriformes were represented by new species and Ciconiformes increased, with some species of swamp environment. Among Caradriformes, Numenius phaeopus, a species adapted to humid environments, was present. Passeriformes sensitively decreased. Guglielmo and Marra [50] argued for a good availability of humid and fresh water environments. It is likely that a good ichthyofauna was present in the freshwaters, sufficient to sustain the rich avifauna. Endemic Strigiformes disappeared, replaced by Bubo bubo. Among Falconiformes, it is worthy of noting the presence of Aquila heliaca, a bird able to prey on animals with a weight up to 10 kg (mainly mammals and birds). The eagle was probably a menace for the cubs of many mammal’s species, while the other Falconiformes preyed upon small vertebrates, such as amphibians, reptiles, birds and dormice [50].

Top predators (Canis lupus, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, and Panthera leo spelaea) fed on populations of herbivores, mainly cervids (Cervus elaphus siciliae and Dama carurangelensis). Bovids, small mammals, and birds have probably been occasional prey, as observed in the behavior of the extant wolves, hyenas, and lions. As scavengers, large predators also fed on dead animals. In conditions of isolation and reduced areas, the slight reduction in size of herbivores might have been a strategy to maintain the number of individuals adequate to avoid extinction. Furthermore, herbivore populations had been numerous enough to feed three species of social predators, which did not evolve endemic features because the size of endemics fell into the variability range of usual prey.

In the opinion of Palombo [47], Hippopotamus pentlandi and Palaeoxodon mnaidriensis, thanks to their reduction in size, occupied ecological niches vacant on the island, that are respectively those of large horses (grazers) and rhinoceroses (mixed-feeders).

Omnivorous mammals (Sus scrofa and Ursus arctos) exploited various food resources, without suffering the effects of isolation.

Large mammal association is indicative of a composite environment, with prairies and open woods, typical of Mediterranean “macchia” (Table 1).

Table Table 1. Habitat, Feeding Behavior and Body Mass of endemic large mammals of Sicily. Categories according to Palombo [5]. Habitat: O = grassland, steppe or savanna; W = forests and closed woodland; Wc = bushland, Mediterranean “macchia” and open woodland. Feeding behavior: Br = browser; Gr = grazer; MF = mixed-feeder; Om = omnivore; P = predator; Sc = scavenger; sP = small predator; SP = superpredator. Body mass: <1 kg (class I); 1–10 kg (class II); 10–60 kg (class III); 60–120 kg (class IV); 120–350 kg (class V); 350–850 kg (class VI); >850 kg (class VII).

Click here to display table

Table 1. Habitat, Feeding Behavior and Body Mass of endemic large mammals of Sicily. Categories according to Palombo [5]. Habitat: O = grassland, steppe or savanna; W = forests and closed woodland; Wc = bushland, Mediterranean “macchia” and open woodland. Feeding behavior: Br = browser; Gr = grazer; MF = mixed-feeder; Om = omnivore; P = predator; Sc = scavenger; sP = small predator; SP = superpredator. Body mass: <1 kg (class I); 1–10 kg (class II); 10–60 kg (class III); 60–120 kg (class IV); 120–350 kg (class V); 350–850 kg (class VI); >850 kg (class VII).
Large mammalHabitatFeeding behaviorBody massFaunal complexes
SpinagalloMaccagnoneS. TeodoroCastello
Palaeoloxodon falconeriO-WcBrVX
Lutra trinacriaeFsPIIXX
Panthera leo spelaeaOSPV X
Hippopotamus pentlandiO-FGrVII X
Dama carburangelensisO-WcMFIV X
Crocuta crocuta spelaeaO-WcSc-SPIII/IV XX
Cervus elaphus siciliaeWcMFV XX
Bison priscus siciliaeOGrVII XX
Bos primimigenius siciliaeO-WcGrVII XX
Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensisO-WcBrVII XX
Ursus arctosWcOmIV XX
Canis lupusO-W-WcPIII XXX
Vulpes vulpesO-WcsPII XXX
Sus scrofaWcOmIV XXX
Equus hydruntinusOGrV XX
Equus ferusOGrVI/VII X
Lynx lynxWPIII X
Martes sp.O-WcsPII X
Mustela cf. nivalisWcsPI X
Cervus elaphusWcMFV X
Bos primigeniusO-WcGrVII X

3.4. San Teodoro Faunal Complex (Formerly Grotta S. Teodoro—Pianetti Faunal Complex)

In the San Teodoro Faunal Complex (Figure 3), some large mammals of the previous fauna became extinct (Panthera leo spelaea, Hippopotamus pentlandi, Dama carburangelensis) and the newcomers (Vulpes vulpes, and Equus hydruntinus) did not evolve endemic features [2]. Bison priscus siciliae might be considered as a newcomer with moderate endemic adaptations, according to Petruso et al. [11]. As already discussed, the arrival of Vulpes vulpes might have been decisive for the extinction of the endemic small mammals’ fauna and the entrance of a renewed stock on the island.

Among small mammals, the endemites Leithia melitensis and Maltamys wiedincitensis became extinct, while the new presence of Apodemus sylvaticus (non endemic), Crocidura sicula, and Microtus (Terricola) savii is recorded. As previously mentioned, Crocidura sicula has been considered a descendant of a new immigrant species [4] and of Crocidura esuae ([38,39,40]. Microtus (Terricola) savii is considered a newcomer, likely dispersing during MIS 4–3, and not a descendent of the Microtus (Terricola) “subterraneumorph of the Maccagnone FC [53], and probably evolved in the endemic Microtus (Terricola) savii nebrodensis, currently present in Sicily [11].

Paleogeography of Sicily and Calabria was similar to nowadays, with some local variations in the coastal lines (Figure 7). The arrival in Sicily of a new stock of small mammals and some large mammals has been related by Bonfiglio et al. [2] to the opening of a land bridge as a consequence of a eustatic low stand, and by Marra [6] to a “stepping stone” dispersal way. Considerations made for the Maccagnone FC are valid also for the San Teodoro FC: if the hypothesis of a “stepping stone” way can be accepted, small mammals could have been easily spread by natural rafts and/or by swimming crossing a partially emerged “sill”.

Geosciences 03 00114 g007 1024
Figure 7. Paleobiogeography of the San Teodoro faunal complex.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 7. Paleobiogeography of the San Teodoro faunal complex.
Geosciences 03 00114 g007 1024

The fossil record of Calabria is richer than before and comes from different depositional settings, demonstrating important geographical and environmental changes, such as a wider extension of inner and coastal plains [6]. During Late Pleistocene, Calabria was easier to cross than before, and the Strait of Messina was not a strong barrier. As a matter of fact, precursors of the species of the San Teodoro FC have been recorded in Calabria, in assemblages attributable to the early Aurelian and to the late Aurelian [6]. Only few mammals that adapted to prairie or mountain environments were present in Calabria and not in Sicily [6]: Equus ferus, Stephanorhinus kirchbergensis, Capreolus capreolus, Capra ibex, Rupicapra rupicapra, and Meles meles. Homo neanderthalensis was sporadically present in Calabria, but its presence is not recorded in Sicily.

At Malta, dormice persisted and three new species, strongly endemic (Cervus sp., Microtus (Pitimys) melitensis, Crocidura sp.), have been recorded [27]. Unfortunately, these species are poorly studied. It is evident that the filter between Sicily and Malta was strong.

Paleoecology of the large mammal association of Sicily is indicative of Mediterranean “macchia” (Table 1). The arrival of Equus hydruntinus, and possibly of Bison priscus siciliae, is corroborated by vegetation reconstructions based upon pollen from coprolites of Crocuta crocuta spelaea recorded in the San Teodoro cave, indicating pre-Late Glacial conditions [59]. Vegetation was dominated by steppic taxa, but also arboreal taxa, and small percentages of mesophilus taxa were present [59]. During the Last Glacial cycle, more precisely, 32,000 ± 4,000 yr BP in Sicily, a wooded steppe biome, with elements representing a variety of local conditions, was present [59]. A paleobiome of southern Italy shows the predominance of wooded steppes during Upper Pleistocene [60]. The character of the steppe was Mediterranean, indicating relatively cool summers.

Avifauna was less diversified then earlier, with prevailing migrant species and some Passeriformes [2,61]. The disappearance of birds typical of humid environments is coherent with the wooded steppe biome.

3.5. Castello Faunal Complex

The Castello faunal complex is represented by a mammal fauna low diversified, without endemites and with Homo sapiens. These features indicate easier communication between Italy and Sicily: all mammals recorded in Calabria, except for Martes sp., are present in the Castello FC (Figure 8) [6].

According to Barrier [10] and Di Geronimo [33] the Strait of Messina has always had an elevated hydrodynamics, while according to Bonfiglio et al. [2] and Lambeck et al. [62] a land bridge emerged 20,000 yr BP (Figure 8).

The Castello FC has an ecological assessment still unbalanced but closer to modern ones. Presence of mammals of wooded (Cervus elaphus, Sus scrofa) and open (Equus ferus, Equus hydruntinus, Bos primigenius, Lepus europaeus) environments (Table 1) can be related to the dry conditions of Late Glacial. Amphibians and reptiles are absent from the fossil record. Avifauna was diversified, with species typical of wooded and open environments and with a large number of migrant species.

Geosciences 03 00114 g008 1024
Figure 8. Paleobiogeography of the Castello faunal complex.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 8. Paleobiogeography of the Castello faunal complex.
Geosciences 03 00114 g008 1024

4. Discussion

The present review started from a reconsideration of the current biochronology of mammals of Sicily. The first part has been devoted to some nomenclature problems, but after the discussion of other available data, it becomes evident that something more substantial is needed. In particular, a formalization of faunal complexes as faunal units having biochronological significance is still lacking. In order to state a formal biochronology, large mammals have to be considered apart from small mammals. The current faunal complexes are based on numerous sites and some of them were formerly excavated without screening for small mammals; it therefore follows that large mammals have to be used to formalize faunal units, as do peninsular ones [12]. The biochronological chart of Quaternary large mammals of Sicily presented here (Figure 3) is correlated to geochronology, the marine isotopic signal, and the mammal ages of Italy, and thus represents a first step to formalization of faunal units.

Small mammals of the Pleistocene of Italy are currently arranged in zones correlated to small mammal ages of Europe [63]. A framework for Sicily is still lacking.

Review of data on paleogeography and the possibility of dispersals allowed the elaboration of paleobiogeographical maps of Sicily and Calabria (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8). The Strait of Messina (Figure 1) played an important role during the Pleistocene period, being a more or less wide sea barrier between southern Italy (Calabria) and Sicily, controlled by tectonics and eustatism [2,3,5,6]. In Early Pleistocene, two sea-straits divided Calabria in three parts, filtering mammal dispersals until their emersion during Early and Middle Pleistocene [6].

For a mammal, the possibility to cross a composite environment is related to its dispersal ability that depends on its anatomy and physiology. Moreover, its settlement on the island depends on available ecological niches and environmental resources, as well as competition and predation. Old and new data suggest an integrated approach, in which the insular species attributes (i.e., dispersal ability, size change, endemism, and adaptive radiation) and the community attributes (i.e., ecological balance and biodiversity) are considered in a biochronological, palaoecological and paleogeographical framework. Furthermore, comparisons with peninsular Italy (in particular Calabria, the southernmost region of peninsular Italy) and the island of Malta, which was part of the insular system, are necessary.

The possibility that Malta could have represented a dispersal way from Africa might have been considered. However, this hypothesis is not sustainable and not only for the distance from the African mainland. On the basis of the presence of taxa with African affinity in the Monte Pellegrino FC and their degree of endemism, the possible dispersal from northern Africa occurred probably in Late Miocene (Messinian), as already discussed. Malta emerged during Late Miocene and has probably been connected to the small islands of Comino and Sicily until Early Pliocene; fossils of that age have not been recorded [27]. No records occur in Calabria, where African fauna might have dispersed. The Quaternary fossil record of Malta is coherent with filtered dispersals from Sicily, which in its turn received faunas from Calabria.

The most reliable reconstruction is that relics of one or more ancient faunas persisted on Sicily from late Miocene to Pleistocene. In Sicily, a late Miocene faunal assemblage including non-endemic large mammals has been found at Messina (Gravitelli site), but has been lost during the 1908 earthquake. Papers published before the terrible event [64,65] allowed the review and determinations of species related to Eurasian forms. The assemblage, recovered in lignite deposits, has been attributed to Messinian for a long time, but Rook et al. [66] attributed it to late Turolian, proposing the existence of a Late Miocene Calabrian–Sicilian bio-province without endemics. These data cannot be used to clarify the character of the fauna of Monte Pellegrino FC and its age. Moreover, the site of Monte Pellegrino is problematic by a stratigraphic point of view, being represented by fissure-filling deposit. However, the fauna of Monte Pellegrino FC could open a window on Late Miocene scenarios: Asoriculus burgioi, Apodemus maximus, Maltamys sp., Leithia sp. and Pellegrinia panormensis could be descendant of forms spread during Messinian, likely coming from north Africa. Also, Crocidura esuae might have been part of this faunal stock. Although the species is not recorded at Monte Pellegrino, its living relative, Crocidura sicula, has a consistent genetic distance from European forms and has affinity to African populations dated to Messinian.

During Quaternary, faunas spread from the Italian peninsula through Calabria and the Strait of Messina (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8); Sicily has been an island becoming more and more “continental,” changing its paleogeography from an archipelago made of two small islands, to a large single island. Moreover, Calabria underwent similar paleogeographic conditions, attaining its territorial continuity and extending its plains thanks to the emersion of some areas. Moreover, Calabria has a very elongated shape, and the main part of its territory is mountainous, with reduced inner and coastal plains. For these reasons, and for its latitudinal extension, Calabria represented a strong filter to the spreading of fauna from north to south. Mammals who challenged these lands underwent endemic processes on the island, mainly consisting in enlargements of size for small mammals, and dwarfing of large mammals, with allometries.

The role of the Strait of Messina in controlling dispersal to Sicily has been greatly overestimated, just because insular associations have been roughly compared to Italian peninsula ones. However, it is widely assumed that, in southern Italy, mammal associations were less diverse than in central or northern Italy, for climatic and geographic reasons. Paleobiography does demonstrate that the sea-strait has been not difficult to cross for mammals, in particular during low-stand phases of the sea level, but they needed to spread to Calabria at first.

Debates on the full emersion of the Strait of Messina can be passed over by considering a “stepping stone” way. It is coherent with geological data, as well as with paleontological ones, being crossable by the majority of recorded mammals and other vertebrates (amphibians included). It is worth noting that elephants could have swam the Strait of Messina several times. The occurrence of “normal” sized elephants in some Middle and Late Pleistocene sites has been recently emphasized by Herridge [67]. Preliminary data indicate the occurrence of large-sized elephants, temporary named “Palaeoloxodon sp. -Sicily 3” at Puntali cave, Zà Minica cave (both refereable to Maccagnone FC) and San teodoro cave.

Dispersal by swimming and natural rafts probably occurred many times during Quaternary and sometimes might have been helped by the emersion of small pieces of land, thanks to the lowering of the sea level during cold stages. From the oldest to the youngest, faunal complexes show increasing biodiversity and decreasing endemism, they progressively lost the character of strong isolation and became more uniform to Calabria, indicating easier connections with mainland.

In the course of these changes in geography, Sicily offered different environments to pioneer faunas. The vertebrate association of the Maccagnone FC indicates a relatively humid environment, with availability of fresh waters. It appears that wooded areas were alternated to open landscapes and Mediterranean “macchia.” In the later association (San Teodoro FC), the climate was more dry, as a consequence of glaciation. Vertebrate associations and vegetation are, according to a steppe biome, related to dry conditions. In terms of interspecific ecological relationships, faunal associations became more complex through time.

The long persistence of small mammals in Sicily, also in the presence of relevant changes of paleogeography, events of extinctions and new arrivals among large mammals and other vertebrates, is worth noting. As already discussed, the long persistence of small mammals on Sicily could have had ecological reasons: species were deeply rooted on the islands and their niche probably did not change through time; possible competitors found giant relatives and presumably lost the struggle for life; main predators of dormice and shrew have been birds of prey of similar sizes. The extinction of endemic small mammals can be due to the environmental changes of Late Pleistocene, shifted to dry conditions, and to the entrance on the island of Vulpes vulpes. The canid was likely the secondary predator of small endemites and did not establish an equilibrium with its occasional prey, thereby causing their extinction.

5. Conclusions

Quaternary mammals of Sicily represent a good case study for island biogeography. The wide dataset reviewed in this paper enables considerations on biochronology, bioevents, evolution of endemites, paleoecology and times and ways of dispersals (Figure 9). The current biochronological framework is well documented, but informal. The names of faunal complexes here proposed avoid ambiguous denominations and open discussions on formalization of biochronology of Sicily.

Geosciences 03 00114 g009 1024
Figure 9. Quaternary mammals of Sicily: bioevents, endemic characters, times and ways of dispersals.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 9. Quaternary mammals of Sicily: bioevents, endemic characters, times and ways of dispersals.
Geosciences 03 00114 g009 1024

Bioevents (i.e., extinctions, turnovers) are strictly related to paleogeography of Sicily and surrounding areas, which changed from an archipelago to a large island (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8). The role of the Strait of Messina in controlling dispersals from mainland has thus far been overestimated, while Calabria can be considered a first filter. Large mammals have been influenced by relevant bioevents, while small mammals persisted unchanged until Late Pleistocene. As a consequence, faunal complexes can be distinguished on the basis of complete or partial renewal of large mammal faunas. Long persistence of small mammals can be hardly related to selective palaeogeographic filters, while it is more reliably due to a well-established equilibrium with predators, disturbed by the spreading of the red fox during Late Pleistocene. Differences in times and ways of dispersals and in reproduction rates, as well as in occurrence in the fossil record existing between large and small mammals require distinct biochronological frameworks. Paleoecology of vertebrate associations is indicative of changes in the availability of environmental resources. Complexity of interspecific relationships and of ecological niches increased through time.

Finally, the data reviewed here enable a paleobiogeographical characterization of Sicily. By a biogeographical point of view, islands can be characterized as oceanic islands (never connected to mainland; a strongly impoverished, unbalanced and endemic fauna is expected) or as continental islands (broadly connected to continents in the past; their faunas are impoverished but similar to continental ones, with low endemism and high diversity) [68]. However, intermediate types of islands can be defined. Alcover et al. [68] defined oceanic-like islands as an island connected to mainland in the distant past; the fauna is similar but more diversified with respect to oceanic islands. Marra [5] indicated a second type of oceanic-like island, which received diversified faunas through occasional routes from the near mainland. Louchart [69] proposed an intermediate type of island, between oceanic and continental ones. In this “intermediate” type, terrestrial carnivorous mammals are missing, while non-flying mammals, mainly rodents, are present and Strigiformes represent the top of the food chain.

Sicily experienced different types of insular conditions. The Monte Pellegino FC is problematic, but it can be tentatively related to an oceanic-like island sensu Alcover et al. [68], which hosted taxa coming from different lands, maybe from a past land connection in the late Miocene. The Spinagallo FC is probably related to the intermediate type of island suggested by Louchart [69]. The MaccagnoneFC and the San Teodoro FC can be indicative of an island that received the faunas spread through varying, sporadic means (natural rafts, active dispersal by swimming or flying), or maybe even a “stepping stone” way. It might correspond to the oceanic-like island of the second type, suggested by Marra [5].

Sicily became more and more “continental” during Late Pleistocene, when exchanges with the mainland were more frequent and the faunal composition indicated a large island, with abundant resources and a well-developed trophic net.

Acknowledgments

The author is deeply indebted to: the anonymous reviewers, whose comments improved this paper; Donald R. Prothero, for his critical reading of the paper; the staff of Geosciences. A.C. Marra dedicates this paper to her daughter Gaia. Founds are provided by University of Messina (PRA 2008-2009).

References

  1. Bonfiglio, L.; Marra, A.C.; Masini, F. The contribution of Quaternary vertebrates to the paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic reconstructions in Sicily. Spec. Pubbl. Geol. Soc. London 2000, 181, 169–182. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonfiglio, L.; Mangano, G.; Marra, A.C.; Masini, F.; Pavia, M.; Petruso, D. Pleistocene Calabrian and Sicilian bioprovinces. Geobios. Spec. Mem. 2002, 24, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonfiglio, L.; di Maggio, C.; Marra, A.C.; Masini, F.; Petruso, D. Biochronology of Pleistocene vertebrate faunas of Sicily and correlation of verterate bearing deposits with marine deposits. Ital. J. Quat. Sci. 2003, 16, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  4. Masini, F.; Petruso, D.; Bonfiglio, L.; Mangano, G. Origination and extinction patterns of mammals in three central western Mediterranean islands from the Late Miocene to Quaternary. Quat. Int. 2008, 182, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marra, A.C. Pleistocene Mammals of Mediterranean Islands. Quat. Int. 2005, 129, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marra, A.C. Pleistocene mammal faunas of Calabria. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2009, 48, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  7. Simpson, G.G. The Geography of Evolution; Chilton Books: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dermitzakis, M.D.; Sondaar, P.Y. The importance of fossil mammals in reconstructing palaeogeography wight special reference to the Pleistocene Aegean Archipelago. Ann. Geolog. Pays Ellen. 1978, 29, 808–840. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sondaar, P.Y.; Dermitzakis, M.D.; de Vos, J. The paleogeography and faunal evolution of the land mammals of Crete. In Pleistocene and Holocene Fauna of Crete and Its First Settlers; Reese, D.S., Ed.; Prehistory Press: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrier, P. Stratigraphie des dépôts pliocènes et quaternaires du Dètroit de Messine [in French]. In Le Détroit de Messine (Italie) Évolution Tectono-Sédimentaire Récente (Pliocène et Quaternaire et Environmnt Actuel); Barrier, P., di Geronimo, I., Montenat, C., Eds.; Institut Géologique Albert de Lapparent (IGAL): Paris, France, 1987; pp. 59–81. [Google Scholar]
  11. Petruso, D.; Sarà, M.; Surdi, G.; Masini, F. Le faune a mammiferi della Sicilia tra il tardo-glaciale e l’Olocene [in French]. Biogeographia 2011, 30, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gliozzi, E.; Abbazzi, L.; Ambrosetti, P.; Argenti, P.; Azzaroli, A.; Caloi, L.; Capasso Barbato, L.; di Stefano, G.; Esu, D.; Ficcarelli, G.; et al. Biochronology of selected Mammals, Molluscs, Ostracods from the Middle Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene in Italy. The state of the art. Riv. Ital. Palentol. Strat. 1997, 103, 369–388. [Google Scholar]
  13. Palombo, M.R. Biochronology of Plio-Pleistocene mammalian faunas of the Italian peninsula: Knowledge, problems and perspectives. Ital. J. Quat. Sci. 2004, 17, 565–582. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thaler, L. Les rongeurs (Rodentia et Lagomorpha) du Monte Pellegrino et la question des anciens isthmus de la Sicilie [in French]. Comptes Rendues de l'Académie de Sciences 1972, 274, 188–190. [Google Scholar]
  15. Burgio, E.; Fiore, M. Pannonictis arzilla (DE GREGORIO, 1886) a “Villafranchian” element in the fauna of Monte Pellegrino (Palermo, Sicily). Ital. J. Quat. Sci. 1997, 10, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonfiglio, L.; Esu, D.; Mangano, G.; Masini, F.; Petruso, D.; Soligo, M.; Tuccimei, P. Late Pleistocene vertebrate-bearing deposits at San Teodoro Cave (Northe-Eastern Sicily): Preliminary data on faunal diversification and chronology. Quat. Int. 2008, 190, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vaufrey, R. Les Elephants nains des iles meditérrannéennes et la question des Isthmes Pléistocène [in French]. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine 1929, 6, 1–220. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kotsakis, T. Sulle mammalofaune quaternarie siciliane. Boll. Serv. Geol. Ital. 1979, 99, 263–276. [Google Scholar]
  19. Burgio, E. Le attuali conoscenze sui Mammiferi terrestri quaternary della Sicilia. [in Italian]. In Prima Sicilia:Alle Origini Della Società Siciliana; Tusa, S., Ed.; Edilprint: Palermo, Italy, 1997; pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ambrosetti, P.; Azzaroli, A.; Bonadonna, F.P.; Follieri, M. A scheme of Pleistocene chronology for the Thyrrenian side of centra Italy. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1972, 91, 169–184. [Google Scholar]
  21. Burgio, E.; Cani, M. Sul ritrovamento di elefanti fossili ad Alcamo (Trapani, Sicilia). Il Naturalista Sicil. 1988, 12, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bonfiglio, L.; Insacco, G. Palaeoenvironmental, paleontologic and stratigraphic significante of vertebrate remains in Pleistocene limnic and alluvial deposits from South Eastern Sicily. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Paleoecol. 1992, 95, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bada, J.L.; Belluomini, G.; Bonfiglio, L.; Branca, M.; Burgio, E.; Delitala, L. Isoleucine Epimerization ages of Quaternary Mammals of Sicily. Ital. J. Quat. Sci. 1991, 4, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tedford, R.H. Principles and Practices of Mammalian Geochronology in North America. In Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago, IL, USA, 5–7 September 1969; pp. 666–703.Part F.
  25. Ferretti, M.P. he dwarf elephant Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis from Puntali cave, Carini (Sicily; late Middle Pleistocene): Anatomy, systematics and phylogenetic relationships. Quat. Int. 2008, 182, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bonfiglio, L.; Mangano, G.; Marra, A.C.; Masini, F. A new Late Pleistocene vertebrate faunal complex from Sicily (S. Teodoro cave. North-eastern Sicily, Italy). Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2001, 40, 149–1587. [Google Scholar]
  27. Van der Geer, A.; Lyras, G.; de Vos, J.; Dermitzakis, M. Evolution of Island Mammals Adaptation and Extinction of Placental Mammals on Islands; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Masini, F.; Sarà, M. Asoricolus burgioi sp. nov. (Soricidae, Mammalia) from the Monte Pellegrino faunal complex (Sicily). Acta Zool. Crac. 1998, 41, 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  29. Petruso, D. Il Contributo dei Micro Mammiferi Alla Stratigrafia e Paleogeografia del Quaternario Continentale Siciliano. [in Italian]. Ph.D. Thesis, Universities of Naples and Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. Daams, R.; de Bruijn, H. A classification of the Gliridae (Rodentia) on the basis of dental morphology. Hystrix 1995, 6, 3–50. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fladerer, F.A.; Fiore, M. The Early Pleistocene insular hare Hypolagus pellegrinus sp. nov. from Northern Sicily. Palaeontogr. Ital. 2002, 89, 37–63. [Google Scholar]
  32. Agnesi, V.; Macaluso, T.; Masini, F. L’ambiente e il clima della Sicilia nell’ultimo milione di anni. [in Italian]. In Prima Sicilia:Alle Origini Della Società Siciliana; Tusa, S., Ed.; Edilprint: Palermo, Italy, 1997; pp. 31–53. [Google Scholar]
  33. Di Geronimo, I. Bionomie des peuplements benthiques des sustrats meubles et rocheux plio-quaternaires du Dètroit de Messine [in French]. In Le Détroit de Messine (Italie) Évolution Tectono-Sédimentaire Récente (Pliocène et Quaternaire et Environmnt Actuel); [in Italian]. Barrier, P., di Geronimo, I., Montenat, C., Eds.; Institut Géologique Albert de Lapparent (IGAL): Paris, France, 1987; pp. 153–169. [Google Scholar]
  34. Palombo, M.R. Climate Change versus biotic interaction: A case study of large mammal faunal complexes on the Italian Peninsula from the Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene. New methodological approaches. Cour. Forsch. Senckenberg 2007, 259, 13–46. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cavinato, G.P.; Petronio, C.; Sardella, R. The Mercure River Basin (Southern Italy): Quaternary stratigraphy and large mammal biochronology. In The World of Elephants, Proceedinggs of the 1st International Congress, Rome, 16–20 October 2001; Cavaretta, G., Gioia, P., Mussi, M., Palombo, M.R., Eds.; Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Rome, Italy, 2001; pp. 187–190. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zammit Maempel, G.; de Bruijn, H. The Plio-Pleistocene Gliridae grom the Mediterranean Islands reconsidered. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Ser. B Phys. 1982, 85, 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  37. Filippucci, M.G.; Kotkakis, T. Biochemical systematic and evolution of Myoxidae. Hystrix 1994, 6, 77–97. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kotsakis, T. Crocidura esui n. sp. (Soricidae, Insectivora) du Plèistocène de Spinagallo (Sicile orientale, Italie) [In French]. Geol. Rom. 1986, 23, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
  39. Esu, D.; Kotsakis, T.; Burgio, E. Vertebrati e Molluschi continentali fossili del Pleistocene di Poggio Schinaldo (Palermo, Sicilia). [in Italian]. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1986, 105, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sarà, M. The Sicilian (Crocidura sicula) and the Canary (C.canariensis) shrew (Mammalia, Soricidae): Peripheral isolate formation and geographic variation. Boll. Zool. 1995, 62, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maddalena, T.; Ruedi, M. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Crocidura. In Advances in the Biology of Shrews; Merritt, F.J., Kirkland, G.L., Rose, R.K., Eds.; Carnegie Museum of Natural History Special Publication: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1994; Volume 18, pp. 334–344. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vogel, P.; Cosson, J.P.; Lòpez Jurado, L.F. Taxonomic status and origin of the shrews (Soricidae) from the Canary islands inferred from mtDNA comparison with the European Crocidura species. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 2003, 27, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dubey, S.; Koyasua, K.; Parapanova, R.; Ribic, M.; Hutterere, R.; Vogela, P. Molecular phylogenetics reveals Messinian, Pliocene, and Pleistocene colonizations of islands by North African shrews. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 47, 877–882. [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson, D.L. Problems in the Land Vertebrate Zoogeography of certain islands and the swimming powers of elephants. J. Biogeog. 1980, 7, 383–398. [Google Scholar]
  45. Quammen, D. The Song of the Dodo. Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinctions; Pimlico: London, UK, 1996; pp. 1–702. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alcover, J.A.; McMinn, M. Predators of vertebrates on islands. BioScience 1994, 44, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Burgio, E.; Fiore, M. Nesolutra trinacriae n. sp. lontra quaternaria della Sicilia. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 1988, 23, 259–275. [Google Scholar]
  48. Palombo, M.R. How can endemic proboscideans help us to understand the “island rule”? A case study of Mediterranean islands. Quat. Int. 2007, 169–170, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pavia, M. The evolution dynamics of the Strigiformes in the mediterranean islands with the description of Aegolius martae n. sp. (Aves, Strigidae). Quat. Int. 2008, 182, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guglielmo, M.; Marra, A.C. Le due Sicilie del Pleistocene Medio: osservazioni paleogeografiche. [in Italian]. Biogeographia 2011, 30, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pavia, M. A new large Barn Owl (Aves, strigiformes, Tytonidae) from the Middle Pleistocene of Sicily, Italy, and its taphonomical significance. Geobios 2004, 37, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raia, P.; Barbera, C.; Conte, M. The fast life of a dwarfed elephant. Evol. Morph. 2003, 17, 293–312. [Google Scholar]
  53. Petruso, D.; Locatelli, E.; Dalla Valle, C.; Masini, F.; Sala, B. Phylogeny and biogeography of fossil and extant Microtus (Terricola) (Mammalia, Rodentia) of Sicily and the southern Italian peninsula based on current. Quat. Int. 2011, 243, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Colantoni, P. Marine geology of the Strait of Messina. In Le Détroit de Messine (Italie) Évolution Tectono-Sédimentaire Récente (Pliocène et Quaternaire et Environmnt Actuel); Barrier, P., Di Geronimo, I., Montenat, C., Eds.; Institut Géologique Albert de Lapparent (IGAL): Paris, France, 1987; pp. 191–210. [Google Scholar]
  55. Abbazzi, L.; Bonfiglio, L.; Marra, A.C.; Masini, F. A revision of medium and small sized deer from the Middle and Late Pleistocene of Calabria and Sicily. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2001, 40, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  56. Brugal, J.P. Cas de ”Nanisme” Insulaire dans L’Auroche [in Franch]. In Proceedings of 112th Congrès National des Sociétés Savantes, Lyon, France, 1987; pp. 53–66.
  57. Marra, A.C. Pleistocene Hippopotamuses of Mediterranean Islands: Looking for Ancestors. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Insular Vertebrate Evolution: The Palaeontological Approach, Mollorca, Spain, 16–19 September 2003.
  58. Marra, A.C. Ursus arctos from selected Pleistocene sites of eastern Sicily. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 2003, 42, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yll, R.; Carriòn, J.S.; Marra, A.C.; Bonfiglio, L. Vegetation reconstruction on the basis of pollen in late Pleistocene hyena coprolites from San Teodoro Cave (Sicily, Italy). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2006, 237, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Allen, J.R.M.; Watts, W.A.; Huntley, B. Weichselian palynostratigraphy, palaeovegetation and palaeoenvironment: The record from Lago Grande di Monticchio, southern Italy. Quat. Int. 2000, 74, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pavia, M. The Middle Pleistocene Fossil Avifauna from the “Elephas mnaidriensis Faunal Complex” of Sicily (Italy). Preliminary Results. In The World of Elephants—International Congress, Proceedings of the First International Congress, Rome, Italy, 16–20 October 2001; pp. 497–501.
  62. Lambeck, K.; Antonioli, F.; Purcell, A.; Silenzi, S. Sea-level change along the Italian coasts for the past 10,000 years. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2004, 23, 1567–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Masini, F.; Sala, B. Large- and small-mammal distribution patterns and chronostratigraphic boundaries from the Late Pliocene to the Middle Pleistocene of the Italian peninsula. Quat. Int. 2007, 160, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Seguenza, G. I vertebrati fossili della provincia di Messina: Parte II, Mammiferi e Geologia del piano Pontico. [in Italian]. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1902, 21, 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  65. Seguenza, G. Nuovi resti di mammiferi pontici di Gravitelli presso Messina. [in Italian]. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1907, 26, 7–122. [Google Scholar]
  66. Rook, L.; Mazza, P.; Rustioni, M.; Torre, D. Lands and Endemic Mammals in the Late Miocene of Italy: Paleogeographic Outlines of Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Areas between 11–9 and 7–4 Ma. In Proceedings of Environments and Ecosystem Dynamics of the Eurasian Neogene (EEDEN), State of the Art Workshop, Lyon, France, 16–18 November 2000; pp. 56–58.
  67. Herridge, V.L. Dwarf Elephants on Mediterranean Islands: A Natural Experiment in Parallel Evolution. Ph.D. Thesis, University College London, London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  68. Alcover, J.A.; Sans, A.; Palmer, M. The extent of extinction of mammals on islands. J. Biogeogr. 1998, 25, 913–918. [Google Scholar]
  69. Louchart, A. Integrating the Fossil Record in the Study of Insular Body Size Evolution: Examples in Owls (Aves: Strigiformes). In Proceedings of the Internation Symposyum Insular Vertebrate Evolution: the Palaeontological Approach, Mollorca, Spain, 16–19 September 2003; pp. 155–174.
Geosciences EISSN 2076-3263 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert