Next Article in Journal
Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Lecithin Decreases Skeletal Muscle COL1A1 and COL3A1 Gene Expression in Finisher Gilts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Welfare Impacts of Pindone Poisoning in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2016, 6(6), 39; doi:10.3390/ani6060039

Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal

The Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, The Recanati Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon OX13 5QL, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Marina von Keyserlingk, Kate Littin, Trudy Sharp and Ngaio Beausoleil
Received: 26 February 2016 / Revised: 15 April 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2016 / Published: 8 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ethical and Welfare Dimensions of the Management of Unwanted Wildlife)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3742 KB, uploaded 8 June 2016]   |  


Moles are considered pests in Britain, but this issue has been little studied. Lower welfare standards have been tolerated for moles than for most other managed wild mammal species, as use of both the controversial poison, strychnine, and unregulated traps have been permitted. Strychnine was withdrawn in 2006 and there were fears that mole populations would increase as a result. In 2007, we conducted a comprehensive, nationwide survey of land manager perceptions, opinions and behaviour regarding moles and mole control on farms, amenities and domestic gardens in Britain. We surveyed 2150 land managers (achieving a 59% response rate) and ground-truthed 29 responses. Moles were reported to be present on most farms and amenities, and 13% of gardens, and were more common in lighter soils. Where present, moles were usually considered pests, this being more likely in Wales, Scotland and northern England, on livestock and mixed farms, and on large, high-value amenities, e.g., racecourses and golf courses. Mole control followed similar patterns to mole presence. More control may occur than is economically, and therefore potentially ethically, justified. Control should be more carefully considered and, where necessary, more effectively targeted. Kill-trapping was the favoured recent and future method on farms and amenities, even if strychnine was to be reintroduced; however, because mole traps are currently unregulated, some might not meet current welfare standards if tested. We found no evidence for an increase in moles since a farm questionnaire survey conducted in 1992; this could have wider implications for future wildlife management policy changes. View Full-Text
Keywords: European mole; Talpa europaea; farms; amenities; gardens; mole control; strychnine; trapping; silage; questionnaire European mole; Talpa europaea; farms; amenities; gardens; mole control; strychnine; trapping; silage; questionnaire

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Baker, S.E.; Ellwood, S.A.; Johnson, P.J.; Macdonald, D.W. Moles and Mole Control on British Farms, Amenities and Gardens after Strychnine Withdrawal. Animals 2016, 6, 39.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top