Next Article in Journal
Dogs’ Body Language Relevant to Learning Achievement
Previous Article in Journal
Conscientious Objection to Harmful Animal Use within Veterinary and Other Biomedical Education
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReprint
Animals 2014, 4(1), 35-44; doi:10.3390/ani4010035

Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research

1
The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, London, UK
2
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
4
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
5
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
This article was previously published by PLoS Biology: Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 January 2014 / Accepted: 31 January 2014 / Published: 3 February 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [888 KB, 10 February 2014; original version 3 February 2014]

Abstract

In the last decade the number of bioscience journals has increased enormously, with many filling specialised niches reflecting new disciplines and technologies. The emergence of open-access journals has revolutionised the publication process, maximising the availability of research data. Nevertheless, a wealth of evidence shows that across many areas, the reporting of biomedical research is often inadequate, leading to the view that even if the science is sound, in many cases the publications themselves are not “fit for purpose”, meaning that incomplete reporting of relevant information effectively renders many publications of limited value as instruments to inform policy or clinical and scientific practice [1–21]. A recent review of clinical research showed that there is considerable cumulative waste of financial resources at all stages of the research process, including as a result of publications that are unusable due to poor reporting [22]. It is unlikely that this issue is confined to clinical research [2–14,16–20]. View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. Animals 2014, 4, 35-44.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top