Next Article in Journal
Can Social Capital influence Smallholder Farmers’ Climate-Change Adaptation Decisions? Evidence from Three Semi-Arid Communities in Burkina Faso, West Africa
Next Article in Special Issue
Engineering Women’s Attitudes and Goals in Choosing Disciplines with Above and Below Average Female Representation
Previous Article in Journal
Youth Work in Turkey: A Sector Newly Emerging and Marked by Political Competition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Negative Gender Ideologies and Gender-Science Stereotypes Are More Pervasive in Male-Dominated Academic Disciplines
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(3), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030032

“It’s Broader than Just My Work Here”: Gender Variations in Accounts of Success among Engineers in U.S. Academia

1
Department of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
The Community Library Association, Inc., Ketchum, ID 83340, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 December 2017 / Revised: 23 February 2018 / Accepted: 25 February 2018 / Published: 28 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Male-Dominated Domains)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [218 KB, uploaded 28 February 2018]

Abstract

Among science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines, the percentage participation of women in engineering has shown significant gains over the past few decades. However, women are still largely absent (or exist in very small numbers) in tenured academic ranks in several engineering sub-fields. In this study we present female and male engineers’ varying understandings of ‘scientific success’ as a potential contributor to women’s retention and success in their (sub)fields. Using in-depth interviews conducted among engineering graduate students and faculty at two U.S. Northwest land-grant research universities, this study demonstrates the ‘dual’ nature in accounts of scientific success, where formal measures of success operate in tandem with informal measures. While both men and women attribute their success to formal and informal measures, gender-based variations tend to be more prevalent among informal measures. By examining these informal measures, this study highlights the context surrounding success. View Full-Text
Keywords: gender; engineering; scientists; STEM; women in engineering gender; engineering; scientists; STEM; women in engineering
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarathchandra, D.; Haltinner, K.; Lichtenberg, N.; Tracy, H. “It’s Broader than Just My Work Here”: Gender Variations in Accounts of Success among Engineers in U.S. Academia. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 32.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top