Next Article in Journal
Youth Work and Serendipity: Some Anthropological Implications
Next Article in Special Issue
Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors that Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers
Previous Article in Journal
The Weight of Categories: Geographically Inscribed Otherness in Botkyrka Municipality, Sweden
Previous Article in Special Issue
“It’s Broader than Just My Work Here”: Gender Variations in Accounts of Success among Engineers in U.S. Academia
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(3), 44; doi:10.3390/socsci7030044

Engineering Women’s Attitudes and Goals in Choosing Disciplines with Above and Below Average Female Representation

1
School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
Colleges of Engineering and Education, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
3
Department of Engineering and Science Education, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
4
Department of Physics & STEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 December 2017 / Revised: 3 March 2018 / Accepted: 5 March 2018 / Published: 13 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Male-Dominated Domains)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [776 KB, uploaded 23 March 2018]   |  

Abstract

Women’s participation in engineering remains well below that of men at all degree levels. However, despite the low enrollment of women in engineering as a whole, some engineering disciplines report above average female enrollment. We used multiple linear regression to examine the attitudes, beliefs, career outcome expectations, and career choice of first-year female engineering students enrolled in below average, average, and above average female representation disciplines in engineering. Our work begins to understand how the socially constructed masculine cultural norms of engineering may attract women differentially into specific engineering disciplines. This study used future time perspective, psychological personality traits, grit, various measures of STEM identities, and items related to career outcome expectations as theoretical frameworks. The results of this study indicate that women who are interested in engineering disciplines with different representations of women (i.e., more or less male-dominated) have significantly different attitudes and beliefs, career goals, and career plans. This study provides information about the perceptions that women may have and attitudes that they bring with them into particular engineering pathways. View Full-Text
Keywords: engineering disciplinary differences; masculine social norms; women in engineering engineering disciplinary differences; masculine social norms; women in engineering
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Verdín, D.; Godwin, A.; Kirn, A.; Benson, L.; Potvin, G. Engineering Women’s Attitudes and Goals in Choosing Disciplines with Above and Below Average Female Representation. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 44.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top